Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction

Immediate breast reconstruction using the transverse abdominal myocutaneous island (TRAM) flap was performed in 54 patients over the past 3 years at our institution. This represented approximately 59 percent of patients undergoing all types of immediate breast reconstruction. In 10 patients, the abdominal island flap was transferred as a free flap based on the deep inferior epigastric pedicle. These patients were compared with the other 44 patients, in whom the flap was transferred using the conventional technique. The TRAM flap is well suited for immediate breast reconstruction because the procedure can be carried out simultaneously with mastectomy using separate operating teams and instruments. The operation is safe and relatively free of complications. The free TRAM group compared favorably with the conventional group in terms of complications, operating time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, and return to functional baseline. The free TRAM flap appears to be as safe as the conventional technique with the advantages of a more limited rectus muscle harvest, improved medial contour of the breast due to the lack of tunneling, and perhaps a healthier flap because of the large donor vessels.     

Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions

The data from the first 50 patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in two units were examined. Average patient age was 42 years, and average weight was 62 kg. Forty percent of patients were chronic smokers, and 26 percent had low abdominal scars. Twelve percent exercised their abdominal muscles regularly. Eighteen percent had undergone radical mastectomy, whereas 76 percent had undergone modified radical mastectomy and 6 percent had undergone subcutaneous mastectomy. Postoperative radiotherapy had been given in 16 percent of patients, and 54 percent had received postoperative chemotherapy. The average time from mastectomy was 32 months, whereas six breasts were reconstructed immediately. Average operating time was 5.6 hours, and average blood loss was 2.4 units. Average hospital stay was 11.2 days. Complications included three total flap losses (6 percent) and two partial flap losses (4 percent). Abdominal hernia occurred in two patients (4 percent).     

Reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flap for paraffinoma breast

Although autogenous tissue can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions in mastectomy patients, because of the magnitude, complexity, and many potential complications associated with the procedure, combined with a long-term recovery, the use of an implant to replace the mastectomy defect is still the most common method for paraffinoma breast treatment. Between July of 1996 and June of 2003, 21 paraffinoma breast patients underwent bilateral pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction. There were 10 primary cases that had never been treated before this visit, including a case of unilateral associated breast cancer. There were also 11 secondary cases that had prostheses implanted after removal of materials injected in other clinics. The diagnoses included unacceptable breast contour in 11 patients, breast hardening in 11 patients, palpable nodules in five patients, nipple malposition in four patients, prominent scarring in three patients, breast skin necrosis in one patient, and nipple necrosis in one patient. A 100 percent flap survival rate with no clinical fat necrosis was achieved. There were 11 of 21 abdominal hypertrophic scars, six of 21 prechest (anterior surface of the thorax) hypertrophic scars, and no abdominal hernia; the symmetry satisfaction rate was 100 percent among primary cases and nine of 11 in secondary cases. The breast softness satisfaction rate in primary cases was also 100 percent and nine of 11 for secondary cases. Excellent cosmetic results were achieved in all patients (42 breasts in total). The unfavorable results of the secondary cases (patients with previous treatments) indicate that it is impossible to completely remove all of the injected foreign body by resection. This also means that scar appearance can only be minimized if resection of the entire paraffinoma is performed through a periareolar incision. The excellent results of the primary cases show that immediate autogenous tissue reconstruction should be the first alternative and is the best option for treating foreign-body granuloma breast, given that autogenous tissue is available. Similarly, the results of the secondary cases also demonstrate that autogenous tissue reconstruction could be considered in reversing some unfavorable results of past treatments.     

Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Use of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for immediate breast reconstruction is controversial because of fear of flap loss and concern that a high complication rate could interfere with adjuvant therapy. One common complication of the TRAM, partial flap necrosis, can interfere with both institution of postoperative therapy and evaluation for recurrence. In an attempt to minimize this problem, we began using the free TRAM flap based on the inferior deep epigastric vessels. This study compares our experience with conventional superior-pedicled (cTRAM) flaps and free TRAM (fTRAM) flaps. A total of 68 breasts were reconstructed in 63 patients, of which 48 of 68 (71 percent) were conventional TRAM flaps and 20 of 68 (29 percent) were free TRAM flaps. Of the 48 conventional TRAM flaps, 26 (54 percent) were unipedicled and 22 (46 percent) were bipedicled. There were 39 of 48 (81 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 17 of 20 (85 percent) free TRAM flaps with T1 or T2 lesions. Node-positive patients occurred in 14 of 48 (29 percent) conventional TRAM flaps and 2 of 20 (10 percent) free TRAM flaps. One-fourth of patients in both groups smoked cigarettes. Twenty-one of 48 patients (44 percent) with conventional TRAM flaps required postoperative chemotherapy, and 6 of 21 (29 percent) were delayed because of complications of the TRAM flap. Of the 7 of 20 (35 percent) free TRAM flap patients who required post-operative chemotherapy, only 1 of 7 (14 percent) was delayed because of TRAM flap complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Incidence of hematoma associated with ketorolac after TRAM flap breast reconstruction

Ketorolac is frequently used as an adjunct for postoperative pain relief, especially by anesthesiologists during the immediate postoperative period. It can be used alone as an analgesic but is more often used to potentiate the actions of narcotics such as morphine or meperidine in an attempt to reduce the total dose and side effects of those drugs. The manufacturer of ketorolac cautions against its use in patients who have a high risk of postoperative bleeding, for fear of increasing the risk of hematoma, but the risk in transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap patients has never been reported. In a study of 215 patients who had undergone TRAM flap breast reconstruction, it was determined that patients who received intravenous ketorolac (n = 65) as an adjunct to their treatment with morphine administered by use of a patient-controlled analgesia device required less morphine (mean cumulative dose, 1.39 mg/kg) than did patients who did not receive ketorolac (n = 150; mean cumulative dose, 1.75 mg/kg; p = 0.02). There was no increase in the incidence of hematoma in patients who were treated with ketorolac. The data presented in this study suggest that the use of intravenous ketorolac does reduce the need for narcotics administration in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction, without significantly increasing the risk of hematoma.     

Evaluation of abdominal sensibility after TRAM flap breast reconstruction

One commonly expressed concern regarding transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction surgery is the return of sensation to the abdomen. Although many studies have focused on abdominal wall muscle incompetence or herniation, there is limited literature discussing postoperative abdominal sensation. The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal sensation a minimum of 1 year after pedicled TRAM flap surgery for breast reconstruction. Twenty-five female patients who underwent TRAM flap breast reconstruction a minimum of 1 year before the study were compared with 10 female volunteer controls. Subject and control abdomens were specifically divided into 12 zones, then assessed for superficial touch, superficial pain, temperature, and vibration using various techniques. Fischer's exact test was used for analysis with the p value set at p = 0.05. The degree to which superficial touch was affected was then tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Student's t test was used for analysis with the p value set at p = 0.05. For all four sensory modalities, subjects were found to have decreased sensation in zones 5 and 8, the supraumbilical and infraumbilical regions. This was statistically significant. When assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, the sensation of the subjects' abdomens was significantly decreased compared with controls. Significance was found in all zones. This study clearly demonstrates that there is a significant and persistent reduction in abdominal sensibility following TRAM flap surgery. The distribution of the deficits is consistent and involves the midline supraumbilical and infraumbilical regions. The TRAM flap has become the procedure of choice for postmastectomy autogenous breast reconstruction. It provides the plastic surgeon with a relatively safe, reliable, and aesthetically pleasing method of breast reconstruction. Since its inception, the TRAM flap and its abdominal closure have undergone numerous modifications designed to minimize donor-site morbidity and create a natural-looking breast. In addition to creating an aesthetically pleasing breast, the TRAM flap has the potential advantage of postoperative improvement in abdominal contour.     

Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients

The records of 82 women who had undergone unilateral breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed to determine what effect obesity had on the rate of complications and the aesthetic quality of the ultimate result. The patients were divided into four groups--thin, average, moderately obese, and markedly obese--based on a weight/height index derived by dividing the weight in kilograms by the height in meters. In the thin group (13 patients), the complication rate was only 15.4 percent. In the average group (22 patients), the complication rate was 22.7 percent. In the moderately obese group (35 patients), the complication rate was 31.4 percent. In the markedly obese group (12 patients), the rate was 41.7 percent. Aesthetic results in the abdomen tended to be better in the nonobese group, but in the breast they correlated better with the number of revisions performed than with degree of obesity. The findings in this study suggest that the complication rate of TRAM flap breast reconstruction does increase in proportion to the degree of obesity. Surgeons can therefore avoid many of the complications from TRAM flap surgery by not operating on very obese patients. Reports of complication rates from different authors may vary in part depending on their mix of obese and nonobese patients.     

Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery

Evaluation of abdominal wall function after transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery has been mostly subjective. The purpose of this study was to measure abdominal wall strength objectively and to compare the results with the patient's performance of daily activities. Abdominal wall strength was objectively measured with the B200 IsoStation machine preoperatively and 1 year after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. These data were compared with the results of a questionnaire evaluating the patient's performance of daily activities. The results of this testing in 21 patients demonstrated the following: (1) a decrease in abdominal wall strength after bilateral pedicled TRAM flap surgery, which was significant in trunk flexion (34.2 +/- 16.9 ft-lbs to 20.6 +/- 15.2 ft-lbs); (2) compensation by other truncal musculature, with an increase in the strength of trunk rotation (18.8 +/- 13.5 ft-lbs to 28.6 +/- 17.7 ft-lbs) seen after unilateral pedicled TRAM flap surgery; (3) minimal interference with the patient's daily activities; and (4) no effect of mesh on strength. A relationship was demonstrated between the degree of loss of strength in trunk flexion and the patient's difficulty in performing certain activities. The patients who had the greatest loss in trunk flexion following the use of both pedicles also had the most difficulty in performing some daily activities. The patients were satisfied with their reconstructive procedure, with an average score of 8.3 (on a scale of 1 to 10), and reported an improvement in the appearance of their abdomen, with an average increase of 5.1 to 6.8 (on a scale of 1 to 10).     

Transverse dual-perforator fascia-sparing free TRAM flap: technique description

As techniques for breast reconstruction with autologous abdominal tissue have evolved, free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps have persevered because of their superior reliability and minimal donor-site morbidity compared with muscle-sparing techniques. Further refinements are described in this article to maximize abdominal flap perfusion and ensure primary closure of the rectus fascia. It has been well documented that incorporating both the lateral and medial perforators provides maximal perfusion to all zones of the lower abdominal transverse skin flap. However, dissection and harvest of both sets of perforators requires disruption and/or sacrifice of abdominal wall tissues. The technique presented here was designed to use both the lateral and medial row perforators, and to minimize abdominal wall disruption. Deep inferior epigastric artery medial and lateral row perforators are selected for their diameter, proximity, and transverse orientation to each other. A transverse ellipse of fascia is incised to incorporate both perforators. The fascial incision is then extended inferiorly in a T configuration to allow for adequate exposure and harvest of the vascular pedicle and/or rectus abdominis, and primary closure. Limiting perforator selection to one row of inferior epigastric arteries diminishes perfusion to the abdominal flap. Furthermore, perforator and inferior epigastric artery dissection often results in fascial defects that are not amenable to primary closure. However, maximal abdominal flap perfusion and minimal donor-site morbidity can be achieved with the transverse dual-perforator fascia-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap technique and can be performed in most patients.