Sca-1(pos) cells in the mouse mammary gland represent an enriched progenitor cell population

Mammary epithelium can functionally regenerate upon transplantation. This renewal capacity has been classically ascribed to the function of a multipotent mammary gland stem cell population, which has been hypothesized to be a primary target in the etiology of breast cancer. Several complementary approaches were employed in this study to identify and enrich mammary epithelial cells that retain stem cell characteristics. Using long-term BrdU labeling, a population of label retaining cells (LRCs) that lack expression of differentiation markers has been identified. LRCs isolated from mammary primary cultures were enriched for stem cell antigen-1 (Sca-1) and Hoechst dye-effluxing "side population" properties. Sca-1(pos) cells in the mammary gland were localized to the luminal epithelia by using Sca-1(+/GFP) mice, were progesterone receptor-negative, and did not bind peanut lectin. Finally, the Sca-1(pos) population is enriched for functional stem/progenitor cells, as demonstrated by its increased regenerative potential compared with Sca-1(neg) cells when transplanted into the cleared mammary fat pads of host mice.     

Reprogramming non-mammary and cancer cells in the developing mouse mammary gland

The capacity of any portion of the murine mammary gland to produce a complete functional mammary outgrowth upon transplantation to an epithelium-divested fat pad is unaffected by the age or reproductive history of the donor. Likewise, through serial transplantations, no loss of potency is detected when compared to similar transplantations of the youngest mammary tissue tested. This demonstrates that stem cell activity is maintained intact throughout the lifetime of the animal despite aging and the repeated expansion and depletion of the mammary epithelium through multiple rounds of pregnancy, lactation and involution. These facts support the contention that mammary stem cells reside in protected tissue locales (niches), where their reproductive potency remains essentially unchanged through life. Disruption of the tissue, to produce dispersed cells results in the desecration of the protection afforded by the "niche" and leads to a reduced capacity of dispersed epithelial cells (in terms of the number transplanted) to recapitulate complete functional mammary structures. Our studies demonstrate that during the reformation of mammary stem cell niches by dispersed epithelial cells in the context of the intact epithelium-free mammary stroma, non-mammary cells, including mouse and human cancer cells, may be sequestered and reprogrammed to perform mammary epithelial cell functions including those ascribed to mammary stem/progenitor cells.     

Reprogramming cell fates in the mammary microenvironment

The capacity of any portion of the murine mammary gland to produce a complete functional mammary outgrowth upon transplantation to an epithelium-divested fat pad is unaffected by the age or reproductive history of the donor. Likewise, through serial transplantations, no loss of potency is detected when compared to similar transplantations of the youngest mammary tissue tested. This demonstrates that stem cell activity is maintained intact throughout the lifetime of the animal despite aging and the repeated expansion and depletion of the mammary epithelium through multiple rounds of pregnancy, lactation and involution. These facts support the contention that mammary stem cells reside in protected tissue locales (niches), where their reproductive potency remains essentially unchanged through life. Disruption of the tissue, to produce dispersed cells results in the desecration of the protection afforded by the “niche” and leads to a reduced capacity of dispersed epithelial cells (in terms of the number transplanted) to recapitulate complete functional mammary structures. Our studies demonstrate that during the reformation of mammary stem cell niches by dispersed epithelial cells in the context of the intact epithelium-free mammary stroma, non-mammary cells may be sequestered and reprogrammed to perform mammary epithelial cell functions including those ascribed to mammary stem/progenitor cells.     

The dynamics of murine mammary stem/progenitor cells

The stem/progenitor cells in the murine mammary gland are a highly dynamic population of cells that are responsible for ductal elongation in puberty, homeostasis maintenance in adult, and lobulo-alveolar genesis during pregnancy. In recent years understanding the epithelial cell hierarchy within the mammary gland is becoming particularly important as these different stem/progenitor cells were perceived to be the cells of origin for various subtypes of breast cancer. Although significant advances have been made in enrichment and isolation of stem/progenitor cells by combinations of antibodies against cell surface proteins together with flow cytometry, and in identification of stem/progenitor cells with multi-lineage differentiation and self-renewal using mammary fat pad reconstitution assay and in vivo genetic labeling technique, a clear understanding of how these different stem/progenitors are orchestrated in the mammary gland is still lacking. Here we discuss the different in vivo and in vitro methods currently available for stem/progenitor identification, their associated caveats, and a possible new hierarchy model to reconcile various putative stem/progenitor cell populations identified by different research groups.     

Overexpression of EphB4 in the mammary epithelium shifts the differentiation pathway of progenitor cells and promotes branching activity and vascularization

Postnatally, the mammary gland undergoes continuous morphogenesis and thereby is especially prone to malignant transformation. Thus, the maintenance of the epithelium depends on a tight control of stem cell recruitment. We have previously shown that epithelial overexpression of the EphB4 receptor results in defective mammary epithelial development and conferred a metastasizing tumor phenotype on experimental mouse mammary tumors accompanied by a preponderance of progenitor cells. To analyze the effect of EphB4 overexpression on mammary epithelial cell fate, we have used Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) analyses to quantify epithelial sub‐populations and repopulation assays of cleared fat pads to investigate their regenerative potential. These experiments revealed that deregulated EphB4 expression leads to an augmentation of bi‐potent progenitor cells and to a shift of the differentiation pathway towards the luminal lineage. The analyses of the ductal outgrowths indicated that EphB4 overexpression leads to enforced branching activity, impedes ductal differentiation and stimulates angiogenesis. To elucidate the mechanisms forwarding EphB4 signals, we have compared the expression profile of defined cell populations between EphB4 transgene and wild type mammary glands concentrating on the wnt signaling pathway and on genes implicated in cell migration. With respect to wnt signaling, the progenitor cell population was the most affected, whereas the stem cell‐enriched population showed the most pronounced deregulation of migration‐associated genes. Thus, the luminal epithelial EphB4 signaling contributes, most likely via wnt signaling, to the regulation of migration and cell fate of early progenitors and is involved in the determination of branching points along the ductal tree.     

Caveolin-1-Deficient Mice Have An Increased Mammary Stem Cell Population with Upregulation of Wnt/?-Catenin Signaling

Here, we show that a caveolin-1 (Cav-1) deficiency leads to an amplification of the adult mammary stem cell population, both in vivo and in vitro. First, the expression of two stem cell markers, Sca-1 and Keratin 6, is dramatically increased in the hyperplastic mammary ducts of Cav-1 deficient mice, suggesting that loss of Cav-1 induces the accumulation of a progenitor cell population in the mammary gland. To independently validate these results, we reconstituted mammary acini formation in vitro via a 3D Matrigel assay system--using primary cultures of mammary epithelial cells derived from WT and Cav-1 deficient mice. We show that Cav-1 null 3D epithelial structures display an intense increase in the expression of three stem cell markers, i.e., Sca-1, keratin 6 and keratin 5. Overall, we observed a 2-to-3 fold increase in the number of Cav-1 KO acini that are positive for a given stem cell marker. Also, we show that such amplification of progenitor cells has functional consequences, as demonstrated by the abnormal presence of myoepithelial cells in the hyperplastic lesions of Cav-1 deficient mammary glands. Finally, we provide evidence that hyper-activation of Wnt/?-catenin signaling may constitute one of the down-stream mechanisms leading to mammary stem cell accumulation. The longevity and slow-dividing properties of mammary stem cells facilitates the accumulation of genetic alterations, and renders these progenitor cells the likely precursors of malignant derivatives. As such, we propose that loss of Cav-1 induces the accumulation of mammary stem cells, and that this event may be an initiating factor during mammary tumorigenesis.     

Matrix compliance and RhoA direct the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells

The regenerative capacity of the mammary gland following post-lactational involution depends on the presence of multipotent stem or progenitor cells. Mammary progenitor cells exist as a quiescent and self-renewing population capable of differentiating into luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells and generating ductal and alveolar structures. The fate choices of these cells are regulated by several soluble signals as well as their surrounding extracellular matrix. Whereas matrix stiffness has been implicated in organ-specific differentiation of embryonic and mesenchymal stem cells, the effects of substratum compliance on the more limited fate switches typical of tissue-specific progenitor cells are unknown. Here, we examined how the mechanical properties of the microenvironment affect the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells. Immortalized human mammary progenitor cells were cultured on synthetic hydrogels of varying stiffness, and their self-renewal and fate decisions were quantified. We found that cells cultured on soft substrata differentiated preferentially into luminal epithelial cells, whereas those cultured on stiff substrata differentiated preferentially into myoepithelial cells. Furthermore, pharmacological manipulations of cytoskeletal tension in conjunction with analysis of gene expression revealed that mechanical properties of the microenvironment signal through the small GTPase RhoA and cytoskeletal contractility to modulate the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells. These data suggest that subtle variations in the mechanical compliance of a tissue can direct the fate decisions of its resident progenitor cells.     

Developmental Stage and Time Dictate the Fate of Wnt/β-Catenin-Responsive Stem Cells in the Mammary Gland

The mammary epithelium undergoes extensive growth and remodeling during pregnancy, suggesting a role for stem cells. Yet their origin, identity, and behavior in the intact tissue remain unknown. Using an Axin2(CreERT2) allele, we labeled and traced Wnt/β-catenin-responsive cells throughout mammary gland development. This reveals a switch in Wnt/β-catenin signaling around birth and shows that, depending on the developmental stage, Axin2(+)?cells contribute differently to basal and luminal epithelial cell lineages of the mammary epithelium. Moreover, an important difference exists between the developmental potential tested in transplantation assays and that displayed by the same cell population in?situ. Finally, Axin2(+) cells in the adult build alveolar structures during multiple pregnancies, demonstrating the existence of a Wnt/β-catenin-responsive adult stem cell. Our study uncovers dynamic changes in Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the mammary epithelium and offers insights into the developmental fate of mammary gland stem and progenitor cells.     

Parity-induced mammary epithelial cells are multipotent and express cell surface markers associated with stem cells

Parity-induced mammary epithelial cells (PI-MECs) are defined as a pregnancy hormone-responsive cell population that activates the promoter of late milk protein genes during the second half of pregnancy and lactation. However, unlike their terminally differentiated counterparts, these cells do not undergo programmed cell death during post-lactational remodeling of the gland. We previously demonstrated that upon transplantation into an epithelial-free mammary fat pad, PI-MECs exhibited two important features of multipotent mammary epithelial progenitors: a) self-renewal, and b) contribution to ductal and alveolar morphogenesis. In this new report, we introduce a new method to viably label PI-MECs. Using this methodology, we analyzed the requirement of ovarian hormones for the maintenance of this epithelial subtype in the involuted mammary gland. Furthermore, we examined the expression of putative stem cell markers and found that a portion of GFP-labeled PI-MECs were part of the CD24(+)/CD49f(high) mammary epithelial subtype, which has recently been suggested to contain multipotent stem cells. Subsequently, we demonstrated that isolated PI-MECs were able to form mammospheres in culture, and upon transplantation, these purified epithelial cells were capable of establishing a fully functional mammary gland. These observations suggest that PI-MECs contain multipotent progenitors that are able to self renew and generate diverse epithelial lineages present in the murine mammary gland.     

Dissociation of estrogen receptor expression and in vivo stem cell activity in the mammary gland

The role of estrogen in promoting mammary stem cell proliferation remains controversial. It is unclear if estrogen receptor (ER)-expressing cells have stem/progenitor activity themselves or if they act in a paracrine fashion to stimulate stem cell proliferation. We have used flow cytometry to prospectively isolate mouse mammary ER-expressing epithelial cells and shown, using analysis of gene expression patterns and cell type-specific markers, that they form a distinct luminal epithelial cell subpopulation that expresses not only the ER but also the progesterone and prolactin receptors. Furthermore, we have used an in vivo functional transplantation assay to directly demonstrate that the ER-expressing luminal epithelial subpopulation contains little in vivo stem cell activity. Rather, the mammary stem cell activity is found within the basal mammary epithelial cell population. Therefore, ER-expressing cells of the mammary epithelium are distinct from the mammary stem cell population, and the effects of estrogen on mammary stem cells are likely to be mediated indirectly. These results are important for our understanding of cellular responses to hormonal stimulation in the normal breast and in breast cancer.     

Growth and differentiation of progenitor/stem cells derived from the human mammary gland

Estrogen is necessary for the full development of the mammary gland and it is also involved in breast cancer development. We set out to identify and characterise progenitor/stem cells in the human mammary gland and to explore the role of estrogen in their proliferation and differentiation. Three candidate stem cell populations were isolated: double positive (DP) cells co-expressed the luminal and myoepithelial markers, EMA and CALLA, respectively, whereas double negative (DN) cells did not express these cell surface markers; side population (SP) cells were characterised by their differential ability to efflux the dye Hoechst 33342. The ABC transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) was more highly expressed in SP cells than in non-SP cells and a specific BCRP inhibitor, Ko143, reduced SP formation, suggesting that BCRP confers the SP phenotype in mammary epithelial cells, as has been demonstrated in other tissues. Interestingly, SP cells were double negative for the EMA and CALLA antigens and therefore represent a separate and distinct population to DP cells. Single cell multiplex RT-PCR indicated that the SP and DN cells do not express detectable levels of ERalpha or ERbeta, suggesting that estrogen is not involved in their proliferation. DP cells expressed ERalpha but at a lower level than differentiated luminal cells. These findings invoke a potential strategy for the breast stem/progenitor cells to ignore the mitogenic effects of estrogen. All three cell populations generated mixed colonies containing both luminal and myoepithelial cells from a single cell and therefore represent candidate multipotent stem cells. However, DN cells predominately generated luminal colonies and exhibited a much higher cloning efficiency than differentiated luminal cells. Further characterisation of these candidate progenitor/stem cells should contribute to a better understanding of normal mammary gland development and breast tumorigenesis.     

Characterization of stem cells from the murine adult mammary gland

The postnatal mammary morphogenesis comprises two steps, first, formation of a system of branching ducts at puberty and second, alveologenesis during pregnancy. The mammary epithelium is organized as a bilayer, composed of two cellular types, basal myoepithelial and luminal epithelial. The remarkable regenerative properties revealed in serial transplantation experiments suggest that the adult mammary epithelium harbors stem cells. Various strategies including analysis of DNA label-retaining cells, transgenic approach, and in vivo transplantation assay, have been used to isolate and characterize murine mammary stem and progenitor cells. Their molecular characteristics remain to be defined precisely but notable progress have been already made in the enrichment and identification of these cells. Current studies favor the hypothesis of a basal-type mammary stem cells expressing high levels of alpha 6, beta1 and beta 3 integrin chains, the major receptors of extracellular matrix proteins. Luminal-type progenitors may participate in the establishment of the bilayered alveolar epithelium during pregnancy.     

Murine Mammary Epithelial Stem Cells: Discovery,Function, and Current Status

An entire mammary epithelial outgrowth, capable of full secretory differentiation, may comprise the progeny of a single cellular antecedent, i.e., may be generated from a single mammary epithelial stem cell. Early studies showed that any portion of an intact murine mammary gland containing epithelium could recapitulate an entire mammary epithelial tree on transplantation into an epithelium-free mammary fat pad. More recent studies have shown that a hierarchy of mammary stem/progenitor cells exists among the mammary epithelium and that their behavior and maintenance is dependent on signals generated both locally and systemically. In this review, we have attempted to develop the scientific saga surrounding the discovery and characterization of the murine mammary stem/progenitor cell hierarchy and to suggest further approaches that will enhance our knowledge and understanding of these cells and their role in both normal development and neoplasia.Before the 1980s there was little if any thought that the epithelium in murine mammary glands might be engendered by or supported by a mammary epithelial specific stem cell. In 1980, Rudland et al. wrote a review entitled “Stem cells in rat mammary development and cancer: A review” and noted that dimethylbenz [α] anthracene (DMBA)-induced rat carcinomas contained all three main types of epithelium found in the normal rat gland, those lining the ductal lumina, those lining the alveolar lumina, and myoepithelial cells (Rudland et al. 1980). They suggested, based on the two types of morphologically distinct epithelial (luminal and myoepithelial) cancer cells in the clonally derived Rama 25 cell line, that a single cell might give rise to both types and this also held true when these cells were inoculated into hosts and produced tumors. Williams and Daniel (Williams and Daniel 1983) suggested that the cap cells at the tip of the growing ducts in the mouse could give rise to both luminal and myoepithelial cells during ductal morphogenesis. However, no direct evidence that a single cell could produce both epithelial cell types in vivo was available. Nevertheless, in retrospect there was evidence that full regenerative activity for mammary epithelial existed in every part of the adult mammary epithelial tree.The experiments that originally showed the potential existence of stem cells in the mouse mammary gland were the pioneering studies of DeOme and his students, Les Faulkin and Charles Daniel. The approach they developed and optimized was serial transplantation of normal mammary gland into the cleared mammary fat pad of syngeneic mice (Deome et al. 1959; Faulkin and Deome 1960). The cleared mammary fat pad allowed the transplantation and growth of normal mammary cells into their normal anatomical site and under the influence of a normal physiological environment. Using this method, DeOme and coworkers showed that all portions of the normal mammary gland contains cells that will grow and fill the fat pad with a normal ductal mammary tree and respond to hormones with a normal differentiation program (Daniel 1975; Daniel et al. 1975). The progeny of the transplanted cells could be serially transplanted into the appropriate recipients for multiple times; however, unlike preneoplastic or neoplastic cells, the normal cells always senesced after multiple serial transplants, generally five to eight transplant generations (Daniel 1975). This was interpreted as indicating mammary stem cells possessed a finite proliferative activity (i.e., life span). This finite life span was a fundamental difference between normal and preneoplastic/neoplastic mammary cells. Cells with an indefinite in vivo life span (i.e., immortalized) have been identified in numerous mammary model systems, including MMTV-induced alveolar hyperplasia''s (Callahan and Smith 2000), chemical carcinogen-induced ductal and alveolar hyperplasia''s (Smith et al. 1978, 1980), hormonally induced alveolar hyperplasia, spontaneously immortalized ductal hyperplasia''s (Medina 2000, 2002), and cells containing specific genetic alterations (i.e., p53 deletion, Polyoma mT antigen) (Maglione et al. 2001; Medina et al. 2002).Subsequent studies showed that stem cells were located along the entire mammary tree and represented in all the different developmental states of the mammary gland. These stages included primary and tertiary ducts from 6- and 16-wk virgin glands, uniparous and multiparous regressed gland, 15-d pregnant and 10-d lactating glands (Smith and Medina 1988). Host age and reproductive history had little influence on the frequency of stem cells as measured by percent successful takes and life span assay (Young et al. 1971; Smith and Medina 1988). Mammary cells taken from 26-mo-old virgin mice had the same transplant potential as cells taken from 3-wk-old mice. Cell populations, from both, senesced after five transplant generations. Similarly, mammary cells in 12-mo-old multiparous mice had the same serial transplant potential as cells from 3-wk-old virgin mice (Young et al. 1971). Finally, continuous hormone stimulation did not induce additional loss of ductal growth potential. These results have important implications for understanding the role of mammary stem cells in normal mammary development because they emphasize that the mammary stem cell is a relatively quiescent cell that is only activated under conditions of gland repopulation (i.e., fetal growth stage and pubertal growth phase).     

Putative epithelial stem cell loss corresponds with mammary growth senescence

Since the advent of transmission electron microscopy of tissues capable of growth and regeneration, cell and developmental biologists have postulated that the undifferentiated cells observed within these tissues represent tissue-specific stem or progenitor cells. However, no studies have addressed the issue of whether these undifferentiated, putative stem cells persist in growth senescent tissues. Serially transplanted mammary epithelium consistently displays growth senescence beginning at the third transplant generation. This process is not uniform throughout the transplanted population and complete growth quiescence for all portions of a given outgrowth is reached subsequent to the 6th transplant generation. Mammary epithelial cells bearing the morphological characteristics of undifferentiated stem cells likewise disappear from senescent populations simultaneous with growth cessation. In premalignant mammary epithelial populations, which exhibit indefinitely prolonged growth potential, both of these cell types are maintained. This observation provides further support for the conclusion that these ultrastructurally distinct mammary cells represent the mammary stem/progenitor cell population.     

Derivation of myoepithelial progenitor cells from bipotent mammary stem/progenitor cells

There is increasing evidence that breast and other cancers originate from and are maintained by a small fraction of stem/progenitor cells with self-renewal properties. Recent molecular profiling has identified six major subtypes of breast cancer: basal-like, ErbB2-overexpressing, normal breast epithelial-like, luminal A and B, and claudin-low subtypes. To help understand the relationship among mammary stem/progenitor cells and breast cancer subtypes, we have recently derived distinct hTERT-immortalized human mammary stem/progenitor cell lines: a K5(+)/K19(-) type, and a K5(+)/K19(+) type. Under specific culture conditions, bipotent K5(+)/K19(-) stem/progenitor cells differentiated into stable clonal populations that were K5(-)/K19(-) and exhibit self-renewal and unipotent myoepithelial differentiation potential in contrast to the parental K5(+)/K19(-) cells which are bipotent. These K5(-)/K19(-) cells function as myoepithelial progenitor cells and constitutively express markers of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and show high invasive and migratory abilities. In addition, these cells express a microarray signature of claudin-low breast cancers. The EMT characteristics of an un-transformed unipotent mammary myoepithelial progenitor cells together with claudin-low signature suggests that the claudin-low breast cancer subtype may arise from myoepithelial lineage committed progenitors. Availability of immortal MPCs should allow a more definitive analysis of their potential to give rise to claudin-low breast cancer subtype and facilitate biological and molecular/biochemical studies of this disease.     

An adjunct mammary epithelial cell population in parous females: its role in functional adaptation and tissue renewal

Mammary gland biologists have long assumed that differentiated secretory epithelial cells undergo programmed cell death at the end of lactation and that the alveolar compartment is reconstituted from undifferentiated precursor cells in subsequent pregnancies. It is generally agreed that the remodeled gland in a parous animal resembles that of a mature virgin at the morphological level. However, several physiological differences have been noted in comparing the responses of mammary epithelia from nulliparous versus parous females to hormonal stimulation and carcinogenic agents. We present genetic evidence that an involuted mammary gland is fundamentally different from a virgin gland, despite its close morphological resemblance. This difference results from the formation of a new mammary epithelial cell population that originates from differentiating cells during pregnancy. In contrast to the majority of fully committed alveolar cells, this epithelial population does not undergo cell death during involution or remodeling after lactation. We show that these cells can function as alveolar progenitors in subsequent pregnancies and that they can play an important role in functional adaptation in genetically engineered mice, which exhibit a reversion of a lactation-deficient phenotype in multiparous animals. In transplantation studies, this parity-induced epithelial population shows the capacity for self-renewal and contributes significantly to the reconstitution of the resulting mammary outgrowth (i.e. ductal morphogenesis and lobulogenesis). We propose that this parity-induced population contributes importantly to the biological differences between the mammary glands of parous and nulliparous females.     

Constitutive activation of smoothened (SMO) in mammary glands of transgenic mice leads to increased proliferation, altered differentiation and ductal dysplasia

The hedgehog signaling network regulates pattern formation, proliferation, cell fate and stem/progenitor cell self-renewal in many organs. Altered hedgehog signaling is implicated in 20-25% of all cancers, including breast cancer. We demonstrated previously that heterozygous disruption of the gene encoding the patched-1 (PTCH1) hedgehog receptor, a negative regulator of smoothened (Smo) in the absence of ligand, led to mammary ductal dysplasia in virgin mice. We now show that expression of activated human SMO (SmoM2) under the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in transgenic mice leads to increased proliferation, altered differentiation, and ductal dysplasias distinct from those caused by Ptch1 heterozygosity. SMO activation also increased the mammosphere-forming efficiency of primary mammary epithelial cells. However, limiting-dilution transplantation showed a decrease in the frequency of regenerative stem cells in MMTV-SmoM2 epithelium relative to wild type, suggesting enhanced mammosphere-forming efficiency was due to increased survival or activity of division-competent cell types under anchorage-independent growth conditions, rather than an increase in the proportion of regenerative stem cells per se. In human clinical samples, altered hedgehog signaling occurs early in breast cancer development, with PTCH1 expression reduced in approximately 50% of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancers (IBC). Conversely, SMO is ectopically expressed in 70% of DCIS and 30% of IBC. Surprisingly, in both human tumors and MMTV-SmoM2 mice, SMO rarely colocalized with the Ki67 proliferation marker. Our data suggest that altered hedgehog signaling may contribute to breast cancer development by stimulating proliferation, and by increasing the pool of division-competent cells capable of anchorage-independent growth.     

Isolation of mouse mammary epithelial progenitor cells with basal characteristics from the Comma-Dbeta cell line

A mouse mammary epithelial cell line with morphogenetic properties in vivo, Comma-Dbeta, was used to isolate and to characterize mammary progenitor cells. We found that a homogeneous cell population expressing high surface levels of stem cell antigen 1 (Sca-1) was able to give rise in vivo to ductal and alveolar structures comprising luminal secretory and basal myoepithelial cells. Unlike the Sca-1(high), the Sca-1(neg/low) cell population displayed a reduced morphogenetic potential. The Sca-1(high) cells presented moderate CD24, high CD44 and alpha6 integrin surface levels, expressed basal cell markers p63, keratins 5 and 14, but no luminal and myoepithelial lineage markers. In culture, the Sca-1(high) cells generated identical daughter cells that retained their in vivo developmental potential, indicating that these cells were maintained by self-renewal. Plated at clonogenic density in Matrigel, Sca-1(high) cells formed spheroids that included luminal and myoepithelial cells. Thus, the isolated Sca-1(high) basal cells possess several features of stem/progenitor cells, including specific markers, self-renewal capacity, and the ability to generate the two major mammary lineages, luminal and myoepithelial. These data provide evidence for the existence of basal-type mouse mammary progenitors able to participate in the morphogenetic processes characteristic of mammary gland development.     

Survival and engraftment of mouse embryonic stem cells in the mammary gland

Embryonic stem (ES) cells have been investigated in many animal models of severe injury and degenerative disease. However, few studies have examined the ability of ES cells to improve functional outcome following mammary gland injury. This study investigates the feasibility of implanting mouse ES cells labeled with enhanced green fluorescence protein in the developing mammary glands in order to acquire lineage-committed cells in mammary (mammary gland epithelial cell or luminal cell). Cells implanted in high numbers (5 × 10(6) cells per mammary gland) survived in the majority of the mice and nearly 38.4% of the surviving cells were CK18(+) at 15th week following the transplantation. Our results may provide a technique instrument on advanced therapy of breast diseases and the mammary regeneration after breast ablated partly.     

Beta1 integrin deletion from the basal compartment of the mammary epithelium affects stem cells

The mammary gland epithelium comprises two major cell types: basal and luminal. Basal cells interact directly with the extracellular matrix (ECM) and express higher levels of the ECM receptors, integrins, than luminal cells. We show that deletion of beta1 integrin from basal cells abolishes the regenerative potential of the mammary epithelium and affects mammary gland development. The mutant epithelium was characterized by an abnormal ductal branching pattern and aberrant morphogenesis in pregnancy, although at the end of gestation, the secretory alveoli developed from beta1 integrin-positive progenitors. Lack of beta1 integrin altered the orientation of the basal-cell division axis and in mutant epithelium, in contrast to control tissue, the progeny of beta1 integrin-null basal cells, identified by a genetic marker, was found in the luminal compartment. These results reveal, for the first time, the essential role of the basal mammary epithelial cell-ECM interactions mediated by beta1 integrins in the maintenance of a functional stem cell population, mammary morphogenesis and segregation of the two major mammary cell lineages.