Integration and dissociation of limb elements in flying vertebrates: a comparison of pterosaurs, birds and bats

Flapping flight has evolved independently in three vertebrate clades: pterosaurs, birds and bats. Each clade has a unique flight mechanism involving different elements of the forelimb. Here, patterns of limb integration are examined using partial correlation analysis within species and matrix correlation analysis across species to test whether the evolution of flapping flight has involved developmental dissociation of the serial homologues in the fore- and hind limb in each clade. Our sample included seven species of birds, six species of bats, and three species of pterosaurs for which sufficient sample sizes were available. Our results showed that, in contrast to results previously reported for quadrupedal mammals, none of the three clades demonstrated significant integration between serial homologues in the fore- and hind limb. Unexpectedly, there were few consistent patterns of within-forelimb correlations across each clade, suggesting that wing integration is not strongly constrained by functional relationships. However, there was significant integration within the hind limbs of pterosaurs and birds, but not bats, possibly reflecting the differing functions of hind limbs (e.g. upright support vs. suspension) in these clades.     

A tissue culture analysis of the steps in limb chondrogenesis

Summary Tissue-culture methods can be used to test the developmental capacity of embryonic cells. In micro-mass cultures, derived from wing cells of stages 21 through 24 chick embryos, aggregates of cells form and then differentiate into cartilage nodules, as judged by the presence of an Alcian blue staining extracellular matrix. Wing cells derived from embryos as young as stage 17 can form aggregates. However, unless they are treated with db cyclic AMP and theophylline, it is not until stage 20 that these aggregates can produce cartilage in culture. In clonal cell culture, cartilage colonies are not produced by primary cell suspensions of limb cells until stage 25 when overt cartilage differentiation is occurring in vivo. It is possible to obtain clonable cartilage cells from limb cells from embryos between stages 20 and 24 if the cells are either treated with db cyclic AMP and theophylline or maintained in suspension culture for 12 to 48 hr. On the basis of these in vitro results a multiple step model for the conversion of limb mesenchyme into cartilage cells is proposed. The model involves the appearance of cells with a predisposition to form aggregates, development of the capacity to form cartilage in response to elevated levels of cyclic AMP, the appearance of receptors that translate changes in either cell shape or cell cycle parameters into elevated levels of cyclic AMP, aggregation, elevated levels of cyclic AMP, cartilage cell determination, and differentiation. This model can serve as the basis for further tests. Presented in the Opening Symposium on Nutritional Factors and Differentiation at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Tissue Culture Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 6–9, 1977. This work was supported by USPHS Training Grant HD00152 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, while P.B.A. was a postdoctoral trainee, and by NIH Grant HD05505 to M.S.     

Regeneration inducers in limb regeneration

Limb regeneration ability, which can be observed in amphibians, has been investigated as a representative phenomenon of organ regeneration. Recently, an alternative experimental system called the accessory limb model was developed to investigate early regulation of amphibian limb regeneration. The accessory limb model contributed to identification of limb regeneration inducers in urodele amphibians. Furthermore, the accessory limb model may be applied to other species to explore universality of regeneration mechanisms. This review aims to connect the insights recently gained to emboss universality of regeneration mechanisms among species. The defined molecules (BMP7 (or2) + FGF2 + FGF8) can transform skin wound healing to organ (limb) regeneration responses. The same molecules can initiate regeneration responses in some species.     

A stepwise model system for limb regeneration

The amphibian limb is a model that has provided numerous insights into the principles and mechanisms of tissue and organ regeneration. While later stages of limb regeneration share mechanisms of growth control and patterning with limb development, the formation of a regeneration blastema is controlled by early events that are unique to regeneration. In this study, we present a stepwise experimental system based on induction of limb regeneration from skin wounds that will allow the identification and functional analysis of the molecules controlling this early, critical stage of regeneration. If a nerve is deviated to a skin wound on the side of a limb, an ectopic blastema is induced. If a piece of skin is grafted from the contralateral side of the limb to the wound site concomitantly with nerve deviation, the ectopic blastema continues to grow and forms an ectopic limb. Our analysis of dermal cell migration, contribution, and proliferation indicates that ectopic blastemas are equivalent to blastemas that form in response to limb amputation. Signals from nerves are required to induce formation of both ectopic and normal blastemas, and the diversity of positional information provided by blastema cells derived from opposite sides of the limb induces outgrowth and pattern formation. Hence, this novel and convenient stepwise model allows for the discovery of necessary and sufficient signals and conditions that control blastema formation, growth, and pattern formation during limb regeneration.     

"Fingering" the vertebrate limb

A detailed and precise picture is being pieced together about how the pattern of digits develops in vertebrate limbs. What is particularly exciting is that it will soon be possible to trace the process all the way from establishment of a signalling centre in a small bud of undifferentiated cells right through to final limb anatomy. The development of the vertebrate limb is a traditional model in which to explore mechanisms involved in pattern formation, and there is accelerating knowledge about the genes involved. One reason why the limb is holding its place in the post-genomic age is that it is rich in pre-genomic embryology. Here, we will focus on recent findings about the aspect of vertebrate limb development concerned with digit pattern across the anteroposterior axis of the limb. This process is controlled by a signalling region in the early limb bud known as the polarizing region. Interactions between polarizing region cells and other cells in the limb bud ensure that a thumb develops at one edge of the hand (anterior) and a little finger at the other (posterior).     

The autopod: Its formation during limb development

The autopod, including the mesopodium and the acropodium, is the most distal part of the tetrapod limb, and developmental mechanisms of autopod formation serve as a model system of pattern formation during development. Cartilage rudiments of the autopod develop after proximal elements have differentiated. The autopod region is marked by a change in the expression of two homeobox genes: future autopod cells are first Hoxa11/Hoxa13 -double-positive and then Hoxa13 -single-positive. The change in expression of these Hox genes is controlled by upstream mechanisms, including the retinoic acid pathway, and the expression of Hoxa13 is connected to downstream mechanisms, including the autopod-specific cell surface property mediated by molecules, including cadherins and ephrins/Ephs, for cell-to-cell communication and recognition. Comparative analyses of the expression of Hox genes in fish fins and tetrapod limb buds support the notion on the origin of the autopod in vertebrates. This review will focus on the cellular and molecular regulation of the formation of the autopod during development and evolutionary developmental aspects of the origin of the autopod.     

Dermal fibroblasts contribute to multiple tissues in the accessory limb model

The accessory limb model has become an alternative model for performing investigations of limb regeneration in an amputated limb. In the accessory limb model, a complete patterned limb can be induced as a result of an interaction between the wound epithelium, a nerve and dermal fibroblasts in the skin. Studies should therefore focus on examining these tissues. To date, however, a study of cellular contributions in the accessory limb model has not been reported. By using green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic axolotl tissues, we can trace cell fate at the tissue level. Therefore, in the present study, we transgrafted GFP skin onto the limb of a non‐GFP host and induced an accessory limb to investigate cellular contributions. Previous studies of cell contribution to amputation‐induced blastemas have demonstrated that dermal cells are the progenitors of many of the early blastema cells, and that these cells contribute to regeneration of the connective tissues, including cartilage. In the present study, we have determined that this same population of progenitor cells responds to signaling from the nerve and wound epithelium in the absence of limb amputation to form an ectopic blastema and regenerate the connective tissues of an ectopic limb. Blastema cells from dermal fibroblasts, however, did not differentiate into either muscle or neural cells, and we conclude that dermal fibroblasts are dedifferentiated along its developmental lineage.     

Congenic method in the chick limb buds by electroporation

Electroporation is a powerful tool with which to study limb development. Limb development, however, remains an intricate series of events, requiring the precise dissection of developmental processes using relevant transgenes. In this review, we describe the anatomy of the limb field as the basis of targeted electroporation, and specific expression vectors are discussed. We share a useful protocol for electroporation of chick limb buds, and the expression pattern of enhanced green fluorescent protein in the limb buds is used to demonstrate relevant embryonic patterning. Finally, useful trouble-shooting techniques are described.     

Effect of FGFR inhibitors on chicken limb development

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling appears essential for the regulation of limb development, but a full complexity of this regulation remains unclear. Here, we addressed the effect of three different chemical inhibitors of FGF receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFR) on growth and patterning of the chicken wings. The inhibitor PD173074 caused shorter and thinner wing when using lower concentration. Microinjection of higher PD173074 concentrations (25 and 50 mmol/L) into the wing bud at stage 20 resulted in the development of small wing rudiment or the total absence of the wing. Skeletal analysis revealed the absence of the radius but not ulna, deformation of metacarpal bones and/or a reduction of digits. Treatment with PD161570 resembled the effects of PD173074. NF449 induced shortening and deformation of the developing wing with reduced autopodium. These malformed embryos mostly died at the stage HH25–29. PD173074 reduced chondrogenesis also in the limb micromass cultures together with early inhibition of cartilaginous nodule formation, evidenced by lack of sulphated proteoglycan and peanut agglutinin expression. The effect of FGFR inhibition on limb development observed here was unlikely mediated by excessive cell death as none of the inhibitors caused massive apoptosis at low concentrations. More probably, FGFR inhibition decreased both the proliferation and adhesion of mesenchymal chondroprogenitors. We conclude that FGFR signalling contributes to the regulation of the anterior‐posterior patterning of zeugopod during chicken limb development.     

Polydactyly in the Strong's luxoid mouse is suppressed by limb deformity alleles

The study of limb development has provided insight into pattern formation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Genetic approaches offer powerful ways to identify the critical molecules and their pathways of action required to execute a complex morphogenetic program. We have applied genetic analysis to the process of limb development by studying two mouse mutants, limb deformity (Id) and Strong's luxoid (Ist). These mutations confer contrasting phenotypic alterations to the anteroposterior limb pattern. The six mutant Id alleles are fully recessive and result in oligosyndactyly of all four limbs. By contrast, the two mutant Ist alleles result in a mirror-image polydactylous limb phenotype inherited in a semidominant fashion. Morphological and molecular analysis of embryonic limbs has shown that the Id and Ist alleles affect the extent and distribution of two key signaling centers differentially: the apical ectodermal ridge and the zone of polarizing activity. Molecular characterization of the Id gene has defined a new family of evolutionarily conserved proteins termed the formins. The underlying molecular defect in the Ist mutation has not been identified; however, both loci are tightly linked on mouse chromosome 2, suggesting the possibility that they may be allelic. In this study, we have used genetic analysis to examine the epistatic and allelic relationships of Id and Ist. We observed that in + Id/Ist + double heterozygotes, a single mutant Id allele is able to suppress the semi-dominant polydactylous Ist limb phenotype. By segregating the Ist and Id loci in a backcross, we observed that these loci recombine and are separated by a genetic distance of approximately 6 cM. Therefore, while our observations demonstrate a genetic interaction between Id and Ist, it is probable that Id and Ist are not allelic. Instead, Ist and Id may be operating either in a linear or in a parallel (bypass) genetic pathway to affect the limb signaling centers. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Analysis of limb patterning in BMP-7-deficient mice

Bone morphogenetic proteins `BMPs' are polypeptide signaling molecules, belonging to the TGF-β superfamily. They were originally identified by their ability to induce ectopic bone formation, but their expression patterns in embryos suggest multiple functions. BMP-7-deficient mice show among other mesodermal and skeletal patterning defects, polydactyly in the hindlimbs `Luo G, Hofmann C, Bronckers ALJJ, Sohocki M, Bradley A, Karsenty G `1995': Genes Dev 9:2808-2820; Dudley AT, Lyons KM, Robertson EJ `1995': Genes Dev 9:2795-2807'. Here we report a more detailed analysis of the limb phenotype in BMP-7-deficient mice using in situ hybridization to monitor expression of molecules implicated in patterning processes of the developing vertebrate limb. In previous studies we showed that Sonic hedgehog (Shh) was expressed normally, but Hoxd-13 expression in limb mesenchyme was lower in BMP-7 mutant limbs. Here we show that Hoxd-11 expression domains are also contracted and decreased in intensity in mutant limbs, suggesting that 5′ genes of the Hoxd cluster are coordinately downregulated, while another Bmp, Bmp-2, which can be activated by Shh, is similarly expressed. The mutant limb buds are broader than normal buds, and fibroblast growth factor Fgf-8 is expressed throughout the extended ridge. However, expression of the homeobox gene Msx-1, which has been shown to be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during limb development, was decreased in the mesenchyme of BMP-7 mutant limbs. Taken together, our data suggest that BMP-7 is involved in regulating proliferation and/or epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the developing limb. © 1996 Wiley-Liss Inc.     

A description of chick wing bud development and a model of limb morphogenesis

The location of the prospective cartilage-forming regions in the embryonic chick wing bud was ascertained by implantation of blocks of wing mesenchyme labeled with tritiated thymidine during the early stages of wing development. The position of the implanted cells was determined by autoradiography, and the location of the implanted block in the limb and its relation to the cartilaginous bones was determined by reconstruction of the host limb from serial sections. The areas corresponding to all of the future wing bones, including the digits, were mapped at each stage from stage 18 to stage 24. Growth of the wing and the prospective bone areas was found to be almost exclusively parallel to an axis perpendicular to the base of the limb. The rate of growth in all areas of the wing reflected the rate of cell division, and all changes in the rate of growth corresponded to changes in the number of dividing cells in the wing and each of the prospective bone regions. Differentiative changes and changes in the growth rate are initiated at a constant distance of 0.4-0.5 mm from the apical ectodermal ridge. These results, considered in conjunction with results of earlier studies in this and other laboratories, suggest that the definitive morphogenetic pattern of the limb arises from four component processes; polarized growth, changes in cell proliferation, cell death, and cytodifferentiation.     

Beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling in apical ectodermal ridge induction and FGF8 expression in normal and limbless mutant chick limbs

The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling pathways are key regulators of vertebrate limb development. FGF10 induces expression of Wnt3a, which regulates the formation and FGF8 expression of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). In amelic limbless limbs, an AER fails to form and FGF8 is not expressed, despite expression of FGF10. It has been found that Wnt3a is initially expressed in limbless ectoderm, although subsequently is drastically reduced. In addition, changes in the expression pattern or level of several Frizzled receptors, Axin, Lef1/Tcf1 and beta-catenin have been found in limbless limbs. Notably, while normal wing buds respond to LiCl-stimulated activation of beta-catenin-dependent signaling by forming ectopic, FGF8-expressing AER, LiCl was unable to induce an AER in limbless wing buds. The results of this study suggest that the limbless gene is required for beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling in limb ectoderm leading to FGF8 expression and AER formation.     

Ectodermal FGFs induce perinodular inhibition of limb chondrogenesis in vitro and in vivo via FGF receptor 2

The formation of cartilage elements in the developing vertebrate limb, where they serve as primordia for the appendicular skeleton, is preceded by the appearance of discrete cellular condensations. Control of the size and spacing of these condensations is a key aspect of skeletal pattern formation. Limb bud cell cultures grown in the absence of ectoderm formed continuous sheet-like masses of cartilage. With the inclusion of ectoderm, these cultures produced one or more cartilage nodules surrounded by zones of noncartilaginous mesenchyme. Ectodermal fibroblast growth factors (FGF2 and FGF8), but not a mesodermal FGF (FGF7), substituted for ectoderm in inhibiting chondrogenic gene expression, with some combinations of the two ectodermal factors leading to well-spaced cartilage nodules of relatively uniform size. Treatment of cultures with SU5402, an inhibitor FGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity, rendered FGFs ineffective in inducing perinodular inhibition. Inhibition of production of FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) by transfection of wing and leg cell cultures with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides blocked appearance of ectoderm- or FGF-induced zones of perinodular inhibition of chondrogenesis and, when introduced into the limb buds of developing embryos, led to shorter, thicker, and fused cartilage elements. Because FGFR2 is expressed mainly at sites of precartilage condensation during limb development in vivo and in vitro, these results suggest that activation of FGFR2 by FGFs during development elicits a lateral inhibitor of chondrogenesis that limits the expansion of developing skeletal elements.     

Initiation of limb regeneration: the critical steps for regenerative capacity

While urodele amphibians (newts and salamanders) can regenerate limbs as adults, other tetrapods (reptiles, birds and mammals) cannot and just undergo wound healing. In adult mammals such as mice and humans, the wound heals and a scar is formed after injury, while wound healing is completed without scarring in an embryonic mouse. Completion of regeneration and wound healing takes a long time in regenerative and non-regenerative limbs, respectively. However, it is the early steps that are critical for determining the extent of regenerative response after limb amputation, ranging from wound healing with scar formation, scar-free wound healing, hypomorphic limb regeneration to complete limb regeneration. In addition to the accumulation of information on gene expression during limb regeneration, functional analysis of signaling molecules has recently shown important roles of fibroblast growth factor (FGF), Wnt/beta-catenin and bone morphogenic protein (BMP)/Msx signaling. Here, the routine steps of wound healing/limb regeneration and signaling molecules specifically involved in limb regeneration are summarized. Regeneration of embryonic mouse digit tips and anuran amphibian (Xenopus) limbs shows intermediate regenerative responses between the two extremes, those of adult mammals (least regenerative) and urodele amphibians (more regenerative), providing a range of models to study the various abilities of limbs to regenerate.     

A staging system for mouse limb development

A series of 15 stages of development for the mouse limb bud have been defined, spanning the time from the first appearance of the limb bud to the completion of limb outgrowth. The stages are based on changes in the morphology of the limb in living preparations. The development and regression of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) as well as the development of the skeletal structures are also described. This staging system has been developed in response to the need to standardize in situ experimental analyses of the mouse limb bud. Comparable stages of the commonly used chick wing and mouse whole embryo systems are presented.     

Separation of the myogenic and chondrogenic progenitor cells of undifferentiated limb mesenchyme

Undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme consists of at least two separate, possibly predetermined, populations of progenitor cells, one derived from somitic mesoderm that gives rise exclusively to skeletal muscle and one derived from somatopleural mesoderm that gives rise to the cartilage and connective tissue of the limb. In the present study, we demonstrate that the inherent migratory capacity of myogenic precursor cells can be used to physically separate the myogenic and chondrogenic progenitor cells of the undifferentiated limb mesenchyme at the earliest stages of limb development. When the undifferentiated mesenchyme of stage 18/19 chick embryo wing buds or from the distal subridge region of stage 22 wing buds is placed intact upon the surface of fibronectin (FN)-coated petri dishes, a large population of cells emigrates out of the explants onto the FN substrates and differentiates into an extensive interlacing network of bipolar spindle-shaped myoblasts and multinucleated myotubes that stain with monoclonal antibody against muscle-specific fast myosin light chain. In contrast, the cells of the explants that remain in place and do not migrate away undergo extensive cartilage differentiation. Significantly, there is no emigration of myogenic cells out of explants of stage 25 distal subridge mesenchyme, which lacks myogenic progenitor cells. Myogenic precursor cells stream out of mesenchyme explants in one or occasionally two discrete locations, suggesting they are spatially segregated in discrete regions of tissue at the time of its explantation. There are subtle overall differences in the morphologies of the myogenic cells that form in stage 18/19 and stage 22 distal subridge mesenchyme explants. Finally, groups of nonmyogenic nonfibroblastic cells which are fusiform-shaped and oriented in distinct parallel arrays characteristically are found along the periphery of stage 18/19 wing mesenchyme explants. Our observations provide support for the concept that undifferentiated limb mesenchyme consists of independent subpopulations of committed precursor cells and provides a system for studying the early determinative and regulatory events involved in myogenesis or chondrogenesis.