Analysis of proteins and peptides on a chromatographic timescale by electron-transfer dissociation MS

Peptide and protein sequence analysis using a combination of gas-phase ion-ion chemistry and tandem MS is described. Samples are converted to multiply charged ions by ESI and then allowed to react with fluoranthene radical anions in a quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Electron transfer from the radical anion to the multiply charged peptide or protein promotes random fragmentation along the amide backbone that is independent of peptide or protein size, sequence, or the presence of post-translational modifications. Examples are provided that demonstrate the utility of electron-transfer dissociation for characterizing post-translational modifications and for identifying proteins in mixtures on a chromatographic timescale (500 ms/protein).     

A data-mining scheme for identifying peptide structural motifs responsible for different MS/MS fragmentation intensity patterns

Although tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has become an integral part of proteomics, intensity patterns in MS/MS spectra are rarely weighted heavily in most widely used algorithms because they are not yet fully understood. Here a knowledge mining approach is demonstrated to discover fragmentation intensity patterns and elucidate the chemical factors behind such patterns. Fragmentation intensity information from 28 330 ion trap peptide MS/MS spectra of different charge states and sequences went through unsupervised clustering using a penalized K-means algorithm. Without any prior chemistry assumptions, four clusters with distinctive fragmentation patterns were obtained. A decision tree was generated to investigate peptide sequence motif and charge state status that caused these fragmentation patterns. This data-mining scheme is generally applicable for any large data sets. It bypasses the common prior knowledge constraints and reports on the overall peptide fragmentation behavior. It improves the understanding of gas-phase peptide dissociation and provides a foundation for new or improved protein identification algorithms.     

Identification of <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">b</Emphasis>-/<Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">y</Emphasis>-ions in MS/MS spectra using a two stage neural network

Independent of the approach used, the ability to correctly interpret tandem MS data depends on the quality of the original spectra. Even in the case of the highest quality spectra, the majority of spectral peaks can not be reliably interpreted. The accuracy of sequencing algorithms can be improved by filtering out such 'noise' peaks. Preprocessing MS/MS spectra to select informative ion peaks increases accuracy and reduces the processing time. Intuitively, the mix of informative versus non-informative peaks has a direct effect on the quality and size of the resulting candidate peptide search space. As the number of selected peaks increases, the corresponding search space increases exponentially. If we select too few peaks then the ion-ladder interpretation of the spectrum will contain gaps that can only be explained by permutations of combinations of amino acids. This will result in a larger candidate peptide search space and poorer quality candidates. The dependency that peptide sequencing accuracy has on an initial peak selection regime makes this preprocessing step a crucial facet of any approach, whether de novo or not, to MS/MS spectra interpretation.We have developed a novel approach to address this problem. Our approach uses a staged neural network to model ion fragmentation patterns and estimate the posterior probability of each ion type. Our method improves upon other preprocessing techniques and shows a significant reduction in the search space for candidate peptides without sacrificing candidate peptide quality.     

Label-free detection of differential protein expression by LC/MALDI mass spectrometry

Protein abundance changes during disease or experimental perturbation are increasingly analyzed by label-free LC/MS approaches. Here we demonstrate the use of LC/MALDI MS for label-free detection of protein expression differences using Escherichia coli cultures grown on arabinose, fructose or glucose as a carbon source. The advantages of MALDI, such as detection of only singly charged ions, and MALDI plate archiving to facilitate retrospective MS/MS data collection are illustrated. MALDI spectra from RP chromatography of tryptic digests of the E. coli lysates were aligned and quantitated using the Rosetta Elucidator system. Approximately 5000 peptide signals were detected in all LC/MALDI runs spanning over 3 orders of magnitude of signal intensity. The average coefficients of variation for all signals across the entire intensity range in all technical replicates were found to be <25%. Pearson correlation coefficients from 0.93 to 0.98 for pairwise comparisons illustrate high replicate reproducibility. Expression differences determined by Analysis of Variance highlighted over 500 isotope clusters ( p < 0.01), which represented candidates for targeted peptide identification using MS/MS. Biologically interpretable protein identifications that could be derived underpin the general utility of this label-free LC/MALDI strategy.     

SwedCAD, a database of annotated high-mass accuracy MS/MS spectra of tryptic peptides

A database of high-mass accuracy tryptic peptides has been created. The database contains 15 897 unique, annotated MS/MS spectra. It is possible to search for peptides according to their mass, number of missed cleavages, and sequence motifs. All of the data contained in the database is downloadable, and each spectrum can be visualized. An example is presented of how the database can be used for studying peptide fragmentation. Fragmentation of different types of missed cleaved peptides has been studied, and the results can be used to improve identification of these types of peptides.     

Enhanced identification of peptides lacking basic residues by LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of singly charged peptides

Peptide sequences lacking basic residues (arginine, lysine, or histidine, referred to as "base-less") are of particular importance in proteomic experiments targeting protein C-termini or employing nontryptic proteases such as GluC or chymotrypsin. We demonstrate enhanced identification of base-less peptides by focused analysis of singly charged precursors in liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Singly charged precursors are often excluded from fragmentation and sequence analysis in LC-MS/MS. We generated different pools of base-less and base-containing peptides by tryptic and nontryptic digestion of bacterial proteomes. Focused LC-MS/MS analysis of singly charged precursor ions yielded predominantly base-less peptide identifications. Similar numbers of base-less peptides were identified by LC-MS/M Sanalysis targeting multiply charged precursors. There was little redundancy between the base-less sequences derived by both MS/MS schemes. In the present experimental outcome, additional LC-MS/MS analysis of singly charged precursors substantially increased the identification rate of base-less sequences derived from multiply charged precursors. In conclusion, LC-MS/MS based identification of base-less peptides is substantially enhanced by additional focused analysis of singly charged precursors.     

Preprocessing Significantly Improves the Peptide/Protein Identification Sensitivity of High-resolution Isobarically Labeled Tandem Mass Spectrometry Data

Isobaric labeling techniques coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry have been widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. For each high-resolution tandem mass spectrum (MS/MS), isobaric labeling techniques can be used not only to quantify the peptide from different samples by reporter ions, but also to identify the peptide it is derived from. Because the ions related to isobaric labeling may act as noise in database searching, the MS/MS spectrum should be preprocessed before peptide or protein identification. In this article, we demonstrate that there are a lot of high-frequency, high-abundance isobaric related ions in the MS/MS spectrum, and removing isobaric related ions combined with deisotoping and deconvolution in MS/MS preprocessing procedures significantly improves the peptide/protein identification sensitivity. The user-friendly software package TurboRaw2MGF (v2.0) has been implemented for converting raw TIC data files to mascot generic format files and can be downloaded for free from https://github.com/shengqh/RCPA.Tools/releases as part of the software suite ProteomicsTools. The data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000994.Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been widely applied to investigate protein mixtures derived from tissue, cell lysates, or from body fluids (1, 2). Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)¹ is the most popular strategy for protein/peptide mixtures analysis in shotgun proteomics (3). Large-scale protein/peptide mixtures are separated by liquid chromatography followed by online detection by tandem mass spectrometry. The capabilities of proteomics rely greatly on the performance of the mass spectrometer. With the improvement of MS technology, proteomics has benefited significantly from the high-resolution and excellent mass accuracy (4). In recent years, based on the higher efficiency of higher energy collision dissociation (HCD), a new “high–high” strategy (high-resolution MS as well as MS/MS(tandem MS)) has been applied instead of the “high–low” strategy (high-resolution MS, i.e. in Orbitrap, and low-resolution MS/MS, i.e. in ion trap) to obtain high quality tandem MS/MS data as well as full MS in shotgun proteomics. Both full MS scans and MS/MS scans can be performed, and the whole cycle time of MS detection is very compatible with the chromatographic time scale (5).High-resolution measurement is one of the most important features in mass spectrometric application. In this high–high strategy, high-resolution and accurate spectra will be achieved in tandem MS/MS scans as well as full MS scans, which makes isotopic peaks distinguishable from one another, thus enabling the easy calculation of precise charge states and monoisotopic mass. During an LC-MS/MS experiment, a multiply charged precursor ion (peptide) is usually isolated and fragmented, and then the multiple charge states of the fragment ions are generated and collected. After full extraction of peak lists from original tandem mass spectra, the commonly used search engines (i.e. Mascot (6), Sequest (7)) have no capability to distinguish isotopic peaks and recognize charge states, so all of the product ions are considered as all charge state hypotheses during the database search for protein identification. These multiple charge states of fragment ions and their isotopic cluster peaks can be incorrectly assigned by the search engine, which can cause false peptide identification. To overcome this issue, data preprocessing of the high-resolution MS/MS spectra is required before submitting them for identification. There are usually two major preprocessing steps used for high-resolution MS/MS data: deisotoping and deconvolution (8, 9). Deisotoping of spectra removes all isotopic peaks except monoisotopic peaks from multi-isotopic peaks. Deconvolution of spectra translates multiply charged ions to singly charged ions and also accumulates the intensity of fragment ions by summing up all the intensities from their multiply charged states. After performing these two data-preprocessing steps, the resulting spectra is simpler and cleaner and allows more precise database searching and accurate bioinformatics analysis.With the capacity to analyze multiple samples simultaneously, stable isotope labeling approaches have been widely used in quantitative proteomics. Stable isotope labeling approaches are categorized as metabolic labeling (SILAC, stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) and chemical labeling (10, 11). The peptides labeled by the SILAC approach are quantified by precursor ions in full MS spectra, whereas peptides that have been isobarically labeled using chemical means are quantified by reporter ions in MS/MS spectra. There are two similar isobaric chemical labeling methods: (1) isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), and (2) tandem mass tag (TMT) (12, 13). These reagents contain an amino-reactive group that specifically reacts with N-terminal amino groups and epilson-amino groups of lysine residues to label digested peptides in a typical shotgun proteomics experiment. There are four different channels of isobaric tags: TMT two-plex, iTRAQ four-plex, TMT six-plex, and iTRAQ eight-plex (12–16). The number before “plex” denotes the number of samples that can be analyzed by the mass spectrum simultaneously. Peptides labeled with different isotopic variants of the tag show identical or similar mass and appear as a single peak in full scans. This single peak may be selected for subsequent MS/MS analysis. In an MS/MS scan, the mass of reporter ions (114 to 117 for iTRAQ four-plex, 113 to 121 for iTRAQ eight-plex, and 126 to 131for TMT six-plex upon CID or HCD activation) are associated with corresponding samples, and the intensities represent the relative abundances of the labeled peptides. Meanwhile, the other ions from the MS/MS spectra can be used for peptide identification. Because of the multiplexing capability, isobaric labeling methods combined with bottom-up proteomics have been widely applied for accurate quantification of proteins on a global scale (14, 17–19). Although mostly associated with peptide labeling, these isobaric labeling methods have also been applied at protein level (20–23).For the proteomic analysis of isobarically labeled peptides/proteins in “high–high” MS strategy, the common consensus is that accurate reporter ions can contribute to more accurate quantification. However, there is no evidence to show how the ions related to isobaric labeling affect the peptide/protein identification and what preprocessing steps should be taken for high-resolution isobarically labeled MS/MS. To demonstrate the effectiveness and importance of preprocessing, we examined how the combination of preprocessing steps improved peptide/protein sensitivity in database searching. Several combinatorial ways of data-preprocessing were applied for high-throughput data analysis including deisotoping to keep simple monoisotopic mass peaks, deconvolution of ions with multiple charge states, and preservation of top 10 peaks in every 100 Dalton mass range. After systematic analysis of high-resolution isobarically labeled spectra, we further processed the spectra and removed interferential ions that were not related to the peptide. Our results suggested that the preprocessing of isobarically labeled high-resolution tandem mass spectra significantly improved the peptide/protein identification sensitivity.     

Improved validation of peptide MS/MS assignments using spectral intensity prediction

A major limitation in identifying peptides from complex mixtures by shotgun proteomics is the ability of search programs to accurately assign peptide sequences using mass spectrometric fragmentation spectra (MS/MS spectra). Manual analysis is used to assess borderline identifications; however, it is error-prone and time-consuming, and criteria for acceptance or rejection are not well defined. Here we report a Manual Analysis Emulator (MAE) program that evaluates results from search programs by implementing two commonly used criteria: 1) consistency of fragment ion intensities with predicted gas phase chemistry and 2) whether a high proportion of the ion intensity (proportion of ion current (PIC)) in the MS/MS spectra can be derived from the peptide sequence. To evaluate chemical plausibility, MAE utilizes similarity (Sim) scoring against theoretical spectra simulated by MassAnalyzer software (Zhang, Z. (2004) Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal. Chem. 76, 3908-3922) using known gas phase chemical mechanisms. The results show that Sim scores provide significantly greater discrimination between correct and incorrect search results than achieved by Sequest XCorr scoring or Mascot Mowse scoring, allowing reliable automated validation of borderline cases. To evaluate PIC, MAE simplifies the DTA text files summarizing the MS/MS spectra and applies heuristic rules to classify the fragment ions. MAE output also provides data mining functions, which are illustrated by using PIC to identify spectral chimeras, where two or more peptide ions were sequenced together, as well as cases where fragmentation chemistry is not well predicted.     

Expert System for Computer-assisted Annotation of MS/MS Spectra

An important step in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is the identification of peptides by their fragment spectra. Regardless of the identification score achieved, almost all tandem-MS (MS/MS) spectra contain remaining peaks that are not assigned by the search engine. These peaks may be explainable by human experts but the scale of modern proteomics experiments makes this impractical. In computer science, Expert Systems are a mature technology to implement a list of rules generated by interviews with practitioners. We here develop such an Expert System, making use of literature knowledge as well as a large body of high mass accuracy and pure fragmentation spectra. Interestingly, we find that even with high mass accuracy data, rule sets can quickly become too complex, leading to over-annotation. Therefore we establish a rigorous false discovery rate, calculated by random insertion of peaks from a large collection of other MS/MS spectra, and use it to develop an optimized knowledge base. This rule set correctly annotates almost all peaks of medium or high abundance. For high resolution HCD data, median intensity coverage of fragment peaks in MS/MS spectra increases from 58% by search engine annotation alone to 86%. The resulting annotation performance surpasses a human expert, especially on complex spectra such as those of larger phosphorylated peptides. Our system is also applicable to high resolution collision-induced dissociation data. It is available both as a part of MaxQuant and via a webserver that only requires an MS/MS spectrum and the corresponding peptides sequence, and which outputs publication quality, annotated MS/MS spectra (www.biochem.mpg.de/mann/tools/). It provides expert knowledge to beginners in the field of MS-based proteomics and helps advanced users to focus on unusual and possibly novel types of fragment ions.In MS-based proteomics, peptides are matched to peptide sequences in databases using search engines (1–3). Statistical criteria are established for accepted versus rejected peptide spectra matches based on the search engine score, and usually a 99% certainty is required for reported peptides. The search engines typically only take sequence specific backbone fragmentation into account (i.e. a, b, and y ions) and some of their neutral losses. However, tandem mass spectra—especially of larger peptides—can be quite complex and contain a number of medium or even high abundance peptide fragments that are not annotated by the search engine result. This can result in uncertainty for the user—especially if only relatively few peaks are annotated—because it may reflect an incorrect identification. However, the most common cause of unlabeled peaks is that another peptide was present in the precursor selection window and was cofragmented. This has variously been termed “chimeric spectra” (4–6), or the problem of low precursor ion fraction (PIF)¹ (7). Such spectra may still be identifiable with high confidence. The Andromeda search engine in MaxQuant, for instance, attempts to identify a second peptide in such cases (8, 9). However, even “pure” spectra (those with a high PIF) often still contain many unassigned peaks. These can be caused by different fragment types, such as internal ions, single or combined neutral losses as well as immonium and other ion types in the low mass region. A mass spectrometric expert can assign many or all of these peaks, based on expert knowledge of fragmentation and manual calculation of fragment masses, resulting in a higher degree of confidence for the identification. However, there are more and more practitioners of proteomics without in depth training or experience in annotating MS/MS spectra and such annotation would in any case be prohibitive for hundreds of thousands of spectra. Furthermore, even human experts may wrongly annotate a given peak—especially with low mass accuracy tandem mass spectra—or fail to consider every possibility that could have resulted in this fragment mass.Given the desirability of annotating fragment peaks to the highest degree possible, we turned to “Expert Systems,” a well-established technology in computer science. Expert Systems achieved prominence in the 1970s and 1980s and were meant to solve complex problems by reasoning about knowledge (10, 11). Interestingly, one of the first examples was developed by Nobel Prize winner Joshua Lederberg more than 40 years ago, and dealt with the interpretation of mass spectrometric data. The program''s name was Heuristic DENTRAL (12), and it was capable of interpreting the mass spectra of aliphatic ethers and their fragments. The hypotheses produced by the program described molecular structures that are plausible explanations of the data. To infer these explanations from the data, the program incorporated a theory of chemical stability that provided limiting constraints as well as heuristic rules.In general, the aim of an Expert System is to encode knowledge extracted from professionals in the field in question. This then powers a rule-based system that can be applied broadly and in an automated manner. A rule-based Expert System represents the information obtained from human specialists in the form of IF-THEN rules. These are used to perform operations on input data to reach appropriate conclusion. A generic Expert System is essentially a computer program that provides a framework for performing a large number of inferences in a predictable way, using forward or backward chains, backtracking, and other mechanisms (13). Therefore, in contrast to statistics based learning, the “expert program” does not know what it knows through the raw volume of facts in the computer''s memory. Instead, like a human expert, it relies on a reasoning-like process of applying an empirically derived set of rules to the data.Here we implemented an Expert System for the interpretation for high mass accuracy tandem mass spectrometry data of peptides. It was developed in an iterative manner together with human experts on peptide fragmentation, using the published literature on fragmentation pathways as well as large data sets of higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) (14) and collision-induced dissociation (CID) based peptide identifications. Our goal was to achieve an annotation performance similar or better than experienced mass spectrometrists (15), thus making comprehensively annotated peptide spectra available in large scale proteomics.     

A reproducibility-based evaluation procedure for quantifying the differences between MS/MS peak intensity normalization methods

The identification of peptides and proteins from fragmentation mass spectra is a very common approach in the field of proteomics. Contemporary high-throughput peptide identification pipelines can quickly produce large quantities of MS/MS data that contain valuable knowledge about the actual physicochemical processes involved in the peptide fragmentation process, which can be extracted through extensive data mining studies. As these studies attempt to exploit the intensity information contained in the MS/MS spectra, a critical step required for a meaningful comparison of this information between MS/MS spectra is peak intensity normalization. We here describe a procedure for quantifying the efficiency of different published normalization methods in terms of the quartile coefficient of dispersion (qcod) statistic. The quartile coefficient of dispersion is applied to measure the dispersion of the peak intensities between redundant MS/MS spectra, allowing the quantification of the differences in computed peak intensity reproducibility between the different normalization methods. We demonstrate that our results are independent of the data set used in the evaluation procedure, allowing us to provide generic guidance on the choice of normalization method to apply in a certain MS/MS pipeline application.     

FragmentationAnalyzer: An open‐source tool to analyze MS/MS fragmentation data

A thorough understanding of the fragmentation processes in MS/MS can be a powerful tool in assessing the resulting peptide and protein identifications. We here present the freely available, open‐source FragmentationAnalyzer tool ( http://fragmentation‐analyzer.googlecode.com ) that makes it straightforward to analyze large MS/MS data sets for specific types of identified peptides, using a common set of peptide properties. This enables the detection of fragmentation pattern nuances related to specific instruments or due to the presence of post‐translational modifications.     

When less can yield more – Computational preprocessing of MS/MS spectra for peptide identification

The effectiveness of database search algorithms, such as Mascot, Sequest and ProteinPilot is limited by the quality of the input spectra: spurious peaks in MS/MS spectra can jeopardize the correct identification of peptides or reduce their score significantly. Consequently, an efficient preprocessing of MS/MS spectra can increase the sensitivity of peptide identification at reduced file sizes and run time without compromising its specificity. We investigate the performance of 25 MS/MS preprocessing methods on various data sets and make software for improved preprocessing of mgf/dta‐files freely available from http://hci.iwr.uni‐heidelberg.de/mip/proteomics or http://www.childrenshospital.org/research/steenlab .     

Intact glucosinolate analysis in plant extracts by programmed cone voltage electrospray LC/MS: performance and comparison with LC/MS/MS methods

We present a comprehensive, sensitive, and highly specific negative ion electrospray LC/MS method for identifying all structural classes of glucosinolates in crude plant extracts. The technique is based on the observation of simultaneous maxima in the abundances of the m/z 96 and 97 ions, generated by programmed cone voltage fragmentation, in the mass chromatogram. The abundance ratios lie in the range 1:2-1:4 ([m/z 96]/[m/z 97]). Examination of the corresponding full-scan mass spectra allows individual glucosinolates of all structural classes to be identified rapidly and with confidence. The use of linearly programmed cone voltage fragmentation enhances characteristic fragment ions without compromising the abundance of the analytically important [M - H]- ion and its associated (and analytically useful) sulfur isotope peaks. Detection limits are in the low nanogram range for full-scan, programmed cone voltage spectra. Comparison of the technique with LC/MS/MS methods (product ion, precursor ion, and constant neutral loss scans) has shown that the sensitivity and selectivity of the programmed cone voltage method is superior. Data obtained on a variety of plant extracts confirmed that the methodology was robust and reliable.     

pepgrep: A Tool for Peptide MS/MS Pattern Matching

Typically, detection of protein sequences in collision-induced dissociation (CID) tandem MS (MS2) dataset is performed by mapping identified peptide ions back to protein sequence by using the protein database search (PDS) engine. Finding a particular peptide sequence of interest in CID MS2 records very often requires manual evaluation of the spectrum, regardless of whether the peptide-associated MS2 scan is identified by PDS algorithm or not. We have developed a compact cross-platform database-free command-line utility, pepgrep, which helps to find an MS2 fingerprint for a selected peptide sequence by pattern-matching of modelled MS2 data using Peptide-to-MS2 scoring algorithm. pepgrep can incorporate dozens of mass offsets corresponding to a variety of post-translational modifications (PTMs) into the algorithm. Decoy peptide sequences are used with the tested peptide sequence to reduce false-positive results. The engine is capable of screening an MS2 data file at a high rate when using a cluster computing environment. The matched MS2 spectrum can be displayed by using built-in graphical application programming interface (API) or optionally recorded to file. Using this algorithm, we were able to find extra peptide sequences in studied CID spectra that were missed by PDS identification. Also we found pepgrep especially useful for examining a CID of small fractions of peptides resulting from, for example, affinity purification techniques. The peptide sequences in such samples are less likely to be positively identified by using routine protein-centric algorithm implemented in PDS. The software is freely available at http://bsproteomics.essex.ac.uk:8080/data/download/pepgrep-1.4.tgz.     

New data base-independent, sequence tag-based scoring of peptide MS/MS data validates Mowse scores, recovers below threshold data, singles out modified peptides, and assesses the quality of MS/MS techniques

The Mascot score (M-score) is one of the conventional validity measures in data base identification of peptides and proteins by MS/MS data. Although tremendously useful, M-score has a number of limitations. For the same MS/MS data, M-score may change if the protein data base is expanded. A low M-value may not necessarily mean poor match but rather poor MS/MS quality. In addition M-score does not fully utilize the advantage of combined use of complementary fragmentation techniques collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) and electron capture dissociation (ECD). To address these issues, a new data base-independent scoring method (S-score) was designed that is based on the maximum length of the peptide sequence tag provided by the combined CAD and ECD data. The quality of MS/MS spectra assessed by S-score allows poor data (39% of all MS/MS spectra) to be filtered out before the data base search, speeding up the data analysis and eliminating a major source of false positive identifications. Spectra with below threshold M-scores (poor matches) but high S-scores are validated. Spectra with zero M-score (no data base match) but high S-score are classified as belonging to modified sequences. As an extension of S-score, an extremely reliable sequence tag was developed based on complementary fragments simultaneously appearing in CAD and ECD spectra. Comparison of this tag with the data base-derived sequence gives the most reliable peptide identification validation to date. The combined use of M- and S-scoring provides positive sequence identification from >25% of all MS/MS data, a 40% improvement over traditional M-scoring performed on the same Fourier transform MS instrumentation. The number of proteins reliably identified from Escherichia coli cell lysate hereby increased by 29% compared with the traditional M-score approach. Finally S-scoring provides a quantitative measure of the quality of fragmentation techniques such as the minimum abundance of the precursor ion, the MS/MS of which gives the threshold S-score value of 2.     

AMASS: software for automatically validating the quality of MS/MS spectrum from SEQUEST results

Time-consuming and experience-dependent manual validations of tandem mass spectra are usually applied to SEQUEST results. This inefficient method has become a significant bottleneck for MS/MS data processing. Here we introduce a program AMASS (advanced mass spectrum screener), which can filter the tandem mass spectra of SEQUEST results by measuring the match percentage of high-abundant ions and the continuity of matched fragment ions in b, y series. Compared with Xcorr and DeltaCn filter, AMASS can increase the number of positives and reduce the number of negatives in 22 datasets generated from 18 known protein mixtures. It effectively removed most noisy spectra, false interpretations, and about half of poor fragmentation spectra, and AMASS can work synergistically with Rscore filter. We believe the use of AMASS and Rscore can result in a more accurate identification of peptide MS/MS spectra and reduce the time and energy for manual validation.     

MS2‐Deisotoper: A Tool for Deisotoping High‐Resolution MS/MS Spectra in Normal and Heavy Isotope‐Labelled Samples

High‐resolution MS/MS spectra of peptides can be deisotoped to identify monoisotopic masses of peptide fragments. The use of such masses should improve protein identification rates. However, deisotoping is not universally used and its benefits have not been fully explored. Here, MS2‐Deisotoper, a tool for use prior to database search, is used to identify monoisotopic peaks in centroided MS/MS spectra. MS2‐Deisotoper works by comparing the mass and relative intensity of each peptide fragment peak to every other peak of greater mass, and by applying a set of rules concerning mass and intensity differences. After comprehensive parameter optimization, it is shown that MS2‐Deisotoper can improve the number of peptide spectrum matches (PSMs) identified by up to 8.2% and proteins by up to 2.8%. It is effective with SILAC and non‐SILAC MS/MS data. The identification of unique peptide sequences is also improved, increasing the number of human proteoforms by 3.7%. Detailed investigation of results shows that deisotoping increases Mascot ion scores, improves FDR estimation for PSMs, and leads to greater protein sequence coverage. At a peptide level, it is found that the efficacy of deisotoping is affected by peptide mass and charge. MS2‐Deisotoper can be used via a user interface or as a command‐line tool.     

Identification and quantification of differentially expressed proteins in E-cadherin deficient SCC9 cells and SCC9 transfectants expressing E-cadherin by dimethyl isotope labeling, LC-MALDI MS and MS/MS

A strategy based on isotope labeling of peptides and liquid chromatography matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LC-MALDI MS) has been employed to accurately quantify and confidently identify differentially expressed proteins between an E-cadherin-deficient human carcinoma cell line (SCC9) and its transfectants expressing E-cadherin (SCC9-E). Proteins extracted from each cell line were tryptically digested and the resultant peptides were labeled individually with either d(0)- or d(2)-formaldehyde. The labeled peptides were combined and the peptide mixture was separated and fractionated by a strong cation exchange (SCX) column. Peptides from each SCX fraction were further separated by a microbore reversed-phase (RP) LC column. The effluents were then directly spotted onto a MALDI target using a heated droplet LC-MALDI interface. After mixing with a MALDI matrix, individual sample spots were analyzed by MALDI quadrupole time-of-flight MS, using an initial MS scan to quantify the dimethyl labeled peptide pairs. MS/MS analysis was then carried out on the peptide pairs having relative peak intensity changes of greater than 2-fold. The MS/MS spectra were subjected to database searching for protein identification. The search results were further confirmed by comparing the MS/MS spectra of the peptide pairs. Using this strategy, we detected and compared relative peak intensity changes of 5480 peptide pairs. Among them, 320 peptide pairs showed changes of greater than 2-fold. MS/MS analysis of these changing pairs led to the identification of 49 differentially expressed proteins between the parental SCC9 cells and SCC9-E transfectants. These proteins were determined to be involved in different pathways regulating cytoskeletal organization, cell adhesion, epithelial polarity, and cell proliferation. The changes in protein expression were consistent with increased cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion and decreased proliferation in SCC9-E cells, in line with E-cadherin tumor suppressor activity. Finally, the accuracy of the MS quantification and subcellular localization for 6 differentially expressed proteins were validated by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence assays.     

Utility of characteristic QTOF MS/MS fragmentation for MHC class I peptides

Systematic investigation of cellular process by mass spectrometric detection of peptides obtained from proteins digestion or directly from immuno-purification can be a powerful tool when used appropriately. The true sequence of these peptides is defined by the interpretation of spectral data using a variety of available algorithms. However peptide match algorithm scoring is typically based on some, but not all, of the mechanisms of peptide fragmentation. Although algorithm rules for soft ionization techniques generally fit very well to tryptic peptides, manual validation of spectra is often required for endogenous peptides such as MHC class I molecules where traditional trypsin digest techniques are not used. This study summarizes data mining and manual validation of hundreds of peptide sequences from MHC class I molecules in publically available data files. We herein describe several important features to improve and quantify manual validation for these endogenous peptides--post automated algorithm searching. Important fragmentation patterns are discussed for the studied MHC Class I peptides. These findings lead to practical rules that are helpful when performing manual validation. Furthermore, these observations may be useful to improve current peptide search algorithms or development of novel software tools.     

Effect of 2MEGA labeling on membrane proteome analysis using LC-ESI QTOF MS

One of the challenges associated with large-scale proteome analysis using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and automated database searching is to reduce the number of false positive identifications without sacrificing the number of true positives found. In this work, a systematic investigation of the effect of 2MEGA labeling (N-terminal dimethylation after lysine guanidination) on the proteome analysis of a membrane fraction of an Escherichia coli cell extract by 2-dimensional liquid chromatography MS/MS is presented. By a large-scale comparison of MS/MS spectra of native peptides with those from the 2MEGA-labeled peptides, the labeled peptides were found to undergo facile fragmentation with enhanced a1 or a1-related (a(1)-17 and a(1)-45) ions derived from all N-terminal amino acids in the MS/MS spectra; these ions are usually difficult to detect in the MS/MS spectra of nonderivatized peptides. The 2MEGA labeling alleviated the biased detection of arginine-terminated peptides that is often observed in MALDI and ESI MS experiments. 2MEGA labeling was found not only to increase the number of peptides and proteins identified but also to generate enhanced a1 or a1-related ions as a constraint to reduce the number of false positive identifications. In total, 640 proteins were identified from the E. coli membrane fraction, with each protein identified based on peptide mass and sequence match of one or more peptides using MASCOT database search algorithm from the MS/MS spectra generated by a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Among them, the subcellular locations of 336 proteins are presently known, including 258 membrane and membrane-associated proteins (76.8%). Among the classified proteins, there was a dramatic increase in the total number of integral membrane proteins identified in the 2MEGA-labeled sample (153 proteins) versus the unlabeled sample (77 proteins).