The distribution of ascus types and photobiontal selection in Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota) against the background of a revised SSU nrDNA phylogeny

Within the last decade, molecular methods have revealed the relationships in many groups of lichenized Ascomycetes. However, the published phylogenies were often contradictory with respect to higher taxonomic levels. To achieve a more convincing overall picture of phylogenetic relationships of and within the Lecanoromycetes, we set up an alignment of all publicly available SSU nrDNA sequences of the Pezizomycotina, discarded those of insufficient quality, and added 21 newly obtained sequences representing groups that were not or under-represented so far. The alignment of 635 taxa and a subset of 166 Lecanoromycetes were analysed with different phylogenetic algorithms. The best phylogenetic trees, with respect to length, resolution, and support, were obtained with the Parsimony Ratchet method and DNAPARS (Phylip). According to these results, the Lecanoromycetes were subdivided into eight monophyletic clades representing the following orders: Acarosporales ad. int., Agyriales, Baeomycetales, Gyalectales, Icmadophilales ad. int., Lecanorales, Ostropales, and Pertusariales. These clades are distributed in two monophyletic groups corresponding to the two different types of ascomatal ontogeny. The taxa of the Lecanorales-clade differ from the other orders by the absence of a primary cyanobiont and of phycobionts of the genera Coccomyxa and Trentepohlia, in combination with the presence of an amyloid reaction of the ascus tips (lacking amyloid flanks). The Lecanorales-clade is subdivided into nine groups which are treated here at the level of suborders: Lecideineae, Teloschistineae, Physciineae, Bacidiineae ad int., Sphaerophorineae ad int., Rhizocarpineae ad int., Psorineae ad int., Cladoniineae, and Lecanorineae. The amyloid reaction pattern of the ascus apex correlates with this grouping at suborder rank. Peltigerales were excluded from the Lecanorales but included in the Lecanoromycetes based on morpho-anatomical features. The Lichinales were excluded from the Lecanoromycetes, while the position of the Umbilicariaceae remains unclear.     

Phylogenetic relationships of Gomphillaceae and Asterothyriaceae: evidence from a combined Bayesian analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences

The phylogeny and systematic position of Gomphillaceae was reconstructed using a combined Bayesian analysis of nuclear LSU rDNA and mitochondrial SSU rDNA sequences. Twenty-four partial sequences of 12 taxa (11 Gomphillaceae and one Asterothyriaceae) plus two new sequences of Stictis radiata (Ostropales outgroup) were generated and aligned with the corresponding sequences retrieved from GenBank, resulting in an alignment of 82 taxa that was analyzed using a Bayesian approach with Markov chain Monte Carlo (B/MCMC) methods. Our results confirm Gomphillaceae sensu Vezda and Poelt plus Asterothyriaceae to be a monophyletic group, with an unresolved relationship between the two families. Placement of Gomphillaceae and Asterothyriaceae within Ostropales sensu Kauff and Lutzoni, as sister of Thelotremataceae, also is strongly supported. Alternative hypotheses placing Gomphillaceae in Lecanorales (Cladoniaceae), Agyriales (Baeomycetaceae) or within bitunicate Ascomycota (Arthoniomycetes, Chaetothyriomycetes, Dothideomycetes) were rejected with our dataset. After recent synonymization of Dimerella with Coenogonium (Ostropales: Coenogoniaceae), we propose the new combination Coenogonium pineti (one of our Ostropales outgroup taxa in this analysis).     

子囊菌的一个新目Umbilicariales J.C.Wei & Q.M.Zhou

本文基于核糖体SSU rDNA序列对石耳科Umbilicariaceae的系统地位进行了研究.将所获得的石耳科地衣中6个种的SSU rDNA序列与GenBank中其它地衣型及非地衣型真菌的相关序列进行比对用于系统发育研究.结果表明长期以来系统地位不够明确而暂时被置于茶渍目Lecanorales的石耳科不能被包括在茶渍目中,分子数据支持成立石耳目Umbilicariales.基于分子数据并结合形态学和解剖学特征描述了新目Umbilicariales J.C. Wei ＆ Q.M. Zhou（Lecanoromycetes,Ascomycota）.     

牛IFN-γ原核表达、单克隆抗体制备及其ELISA检测方法的建立

实验旨在建立牛重组IFN-γ(BovIFN-γ)的ELISA检测技术,为牛传染病的免疫学诊断提供新方法。PHA刺激体外培养的奶牛外周血白细胞,从培养细胞中提取总RNA,经过RT-PCR扩增出BovIFN-γ基因cDNA,进一步克隆至pET28a,转化大肠杆菌,经IPTG诱导,表达出预期大小(18kD左右)组氨酸标记蛋白,经鉴定为BovIFN-γ;以纯化的重组BovIFN-γ为免疫原,应用淋巴细胞杂交瘤技术,获得4株能稳定分泌抗BovIFN-γ单克隆抗体的细胞株,分别命名为A7、A10、G6与G10。免疫球蛋白亚类鉴定证明杂交瘤细胞所分泌的抗体均为IgG1,腹水效价在1∶210×100~1∶211×100之间。Western-blot分析显示,4株单抗均能特异性结合重组BovIFN-γ。ELISA试验表明,4株单抗只与融合蛋白BovIFN-γ反应,而不与非相关性蛋白Ag85B、ESAT-6-CFP-10、GM-CSF等发生反应。选取A10细胞株分泌的单克隆抗体、纯化的多克隆抗体及辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)标记的羊抗兔IgG,建立了检测BovIFN-γ的双抗体夹心ELISA方法。实验结果表明,此方法检测敏感性达到2ng/mL,特异性良好,为进一步建立灵敏、特异的病原感染诊断方法奠定了基础。     

子囊菌的一个新目Umbilicariales J.C. Wei & Q.M. Zhou

本文基于核糖体SSU rDNA序列对石耳科Umbilicariaceae的系统地位进行了研究.将所获得的石耳科地衣中6个种的SSU rDNA序列与GenBank中其它地衣型及非地衣型真菌的相关序列进行比对用于系统发育研究.结果表明长期以来系统地位不够明确而暂时被置于茶渍目Lecanorales的石耳科不能被包括在茶渍目中,分子数据支持成立石耳目Umbilicariales.基于分子数据并结合形态学和解剖学特征描述了新目Umbilicariales J.C. Wei & Q.M. Zhou(Lecanoromycetes,Ascomycota).     

Diversity of the lichenized fungi in King George Island, Antarctica, revealed by phylogenetic analysis of partial large subunit rDNA sequences

Lichens are predominant and important components of flora in the terrestrial ecosystem of Antarctica. However, relatively few researches on the phylogenetic position of Antarctic lichen-forming fungi have been accomplished. In this study, partial sequences of nuclear large subunit rDNAs from 50 Antarctic specimens were obtained and the phylogeny was reconstructed. Antarctic lichen species were distributed among 4 orders, including the monophyletic order Agyrales, paraphyletic orders Pertusariales and Teloschistales, and polyphyletic order Lecanorales. Species diversity was highest in the order Lecanorales, followed by Teloschistales and Pertusariales. Based on the phylogeny and sequence similarity analyses, it is proposed that the taxonomy of Stereocaulon alpinum, Physcia caesia, Usnea aurantiacoatra, and Cladonia species should be revised by careful examination of their phenotypic and molecular characteristics. Six species known to be endemic to Antarctica, Catillaria corymbosa, Himantormia lugubris, Leptogium puberulum, Pertusaria pertusa, Rhizoplaca aspidophora, and Umbilicaria antarctica, formed unique lineages, implying independent origins in the Antarctic area.     

The Phylogeny of the Families Lecanoraceae and Bacidiaceae (Lichenized Ascomycota) Inferred from Nuclear SSU rDNA Sequences

Abstract: The phylogeny of the families Lecanoraceae and Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) was investigated using 29 nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences, 9 of which were newly determined. The data set contained 368 variable characters, 234 of which were parsimony-informative. Phylogenetic estimations were performed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. In the most parsimonious and most likely reconstructions, the Bacidiaceae sensu Hafellner 1988 forms a monophyletic group and the Lecanoraceae sensu Hafellner a paraphyletic group. The genera Tephromela and Scoliciosporum appear to belong outside these families. However, the hypothesis that the Lecanoraceae sensu Hafellner is monophyletic cannot be rejected, as indicated by a Kishino-Hasegawa test. Three hypotheses were rejected by Kishino-Hasegawa tests, viz. (1) that the Lecanoraceae and Bacidiaceae together form a monophyletic group; (2) that both the Lecanoraceae (incl. Scoliciosporum ) and Bacidiaceae (incl. Tephromela ) are monophyletic; and (3) that the ascus apex anatomy reflects phylogeny. The suborder Lecanorineae is paraphyletic unless the Stereocaulaceae and Cladoniaceae are included. One or both of the Bacidia and Lecanora types of ascus have probably evolved at least twice.     

Higher level phylogenetic relationships of euascomycetes (Pezizomycotina) inferred from a combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data

A combined data set of nuclear SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA, and mitochondrial SSU rDNA sequences was analyzed in order to examine the relationships of the major clades of euascomycetes. Partial sequences of 14 ascomycetes were determined and aligned with the corresponding sequences of 16 other ascomycetes retrieved from Genbank. The alignment was analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP) and a Bayesian analysis with Markov chain Monte Carlo (B/MCMC). The classification based on single-gene studies is supported, but the confidence is enhanced in the concatenated analysis. The monophyly of the superclass Leotiomyceta, which includes all euascomycetes with inoperculate asci, is strongly supported. The polyphyly of ascolocularous fungi is supported. The group is divided into two groups: the Dothideomycetes basal to all other Leotiomyceta and the Chaetothyriomycetes as sister-group to Eurotiomycetes. The Lecanoromycetes appear as a monophyletic group with strong support and form a sister-group to the Chaetothyriomycetes/Eurotiomycetes clade, but this lacks support. The Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes form a strongly supported sister-group. Alternative topologies are tested using parametric bootstrapping; a basal position of the Eurotiomycetes and Leotiomycetes in the Leotiomyceta cannot be rejected, while such a position can be rejected for Chaetothyriomycetes, Lecanoromycetes and Sordariomycetes. The character evolution with regard to ascoma type, ascus type and ascoma-ontogeny is examined using MP and maximum likelihood (ML). While it appears most likely that the ancestor of the inoperculate ascomycetes had apothecia and an ascohymenial ascoma-ontogeny using MP methods, the ML approach shows that there is some uncertainty at the current state of knowledge. The improvement of confidence of the combined data set in comparison with single-gene studies makes us confident that analyses with additional data sets will further improve the confidence and eventually uncover the branching order of euascomycetes.     

The phylogenetic relationships of the cyanobacterial lichens in the Lecanorales suborder Peltigerineae

We present major cladistic analyses of the Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota, Fungi) focusing on the Lecanorales suborder Peltigerineae, a group including the majority of the cyanobacterial lichens. DNA sequence datasets from the mtSSU and nLSU rDNA were produced and analyzed with maximum parsimony and parsimony jackknifing. The results suggest that the Lecanorales is monophyletic. The Peltigerineae (including Placynthiaceae, Peltigeraceae, Lobariaceae, Nephromataceae, Collemataceae, Coccocarpiaceae, Pannariaceae, and Massalongia) is likewise a monophyletic group. The Lobariaceae, and Lobaria in the traditional sense, are strongly supported as monophyletic, in contrast to results of other investigations based on nITS rDNA data. Pseudocyphellaria may be paraphyletic. Placynthiaceae is the sister group to the Collemataceae and Collema may be nested within Leptogium. Pannariaceae in the traditional sense is not a monophyletic group. Finally, the Lecanorineae is nonmonophyletic in all analyses, and the Cladoniineae and Teloschistineae are nested within the Lecanorineae in the combined analysis.     

Phylogenetic affiliations of members of the heterogeneous lichen-forming fungi of the genus Lecidea sensu Zahlbruckner (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota)

The genus Lecidea Ach. sensu lato (sensu Zahlbruckner) includes almost 1200 species, out of which only 100 species represent Lecidea sensu stricto (sensu Hertel). The systematic position of the remaining species is mostly unsettled but anticipated to represent several unrelated lineages within Lecanoromycetes. This study attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic placement of members of this heterogeneous group of lichen-forming fungi and to improve the classification and phylogeny of Lecanoromycetes. Twenty-five taxa of Lecidea sensu lato and 22 putatively allied species were studied in a broad selection of 268 taxa, representing 48 families of Lecanoromycetes. Six loci, including four ribosomal and two protein-coding genes for 315- and 209-OTU datasets were subjected to maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. The resulting well supported phylogenetic relationships within Lecanoromycetes are in agreement with published phylogenies, but the addition of new taxa revealed putative rearrangements of several families (e.g. Catillariaceae, Lecanoraceae, Lecideaceae, Megalariaceae, Pilocarpaceae and Ramalinaceae). As expected, species of Lecidea sensu lato and putatively related taxa are scattered within Lecanoromycetidae and beyond, with several species nested in Lecanoraceae and Pilocarpaceae and others placed outside currently recognized families in Lecanorales and orders in Lecanoromycetidae. The phylogenetic affiliations of Schaereria and Strangospora are outside Lecanoromycetidae, probably with Ostropomycetidae. All species referred to as Lecidea sensu stricto based on morphology (including the type species, Lecidea fuscoatra [L.] Ach.) form, with Porpidia species, a monophyletic group with high posterior probability outside Lecanorales, Peltigerales and Teloschistales, in Lecanoromycetidae, supporting the recognition of order Lecideales Vain. in this subclass. The genus name Lecidea must be redefined to apply only to Lecidea sensu stricto and to include at least some members of the genus Porpidia. Based on morphological and chemical similarities, as well as the phylogenetic relationship of Lecidea pullata sister to Frutidella caesioatra, the new combination Frutidella pullata is proposed here.     

Origin and Evolution of the Lichenized Ascomycete Order Lichinales: Monophyly and Systematic Relationships Inferred from Ascus, Fruiting Body and SSU rDNA Evolution

Abstract: The Lichinales are a group of lichenized ascomycetes that almost exclusively possess cyanobacteria as their primary photobiont and are hitherto separated from the Lecanorales, the major group of lichenized ascomycetes, by thallus structure, ascoma ontogeny, ascus structure and ascus function. The relationship of the two families Peltulaceae and Lichinaceae, both placed within the Lichinales, with the Heppiaceae, placed within the Lecanorales, was investigated, as well as a possible sister group relationship of the Lichinales to the Lecanorales. Phylogenetic analyses included non-molecular data as well as 18S rDNA sequence data. The monophyly of the Lichinales including the family Heppiaceae and a sister group relationship of Lichinales and Lecanorales, based on the shared presence of lecanoralean asci, are proposed in a morphological hypothesis. Parsimony and distance analyses of 18S rDNA sequence data strongly support the monophyly of the Lichinales, including all three families. Therefore, the presence of rostrate, lecanoralean asci in Peltula and part of the Lichinaceae suggests that this ascus type is an autapomorphy of the monophyletic Lichinales. Furthermore, the occurrence of prototunicate asci in the Heppiaceae and most of the Lichinaceae is autapomorphic and was gained independently by reduction of the rostrate ascus. The 18S rDNA analysis did not reject the non-molecular hypothesis of a sister group relationship of the Lichinales and the Lecanorales as based on ascus characters. The alternative placement of the Lichinales as the sister group of all inoperculate euascomycetes excluding the Sordariomycetes and most of the Leotiales in the gene tree received unsufficient bootstrap support and no support from any non-molecular data and consequently was rejected.     

A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Areceae (Arecaceae) using two low-copy nuclear genes

 A phylogenetic study of the largest tribe of palms, the Areceae, was conducted using sequences of two low-copy nuclear genes. Previous morphological and plastid DNA studies have not supported the monophyly of the tribe, but have placed its members in a large clade that includes the monophyletic tribes Geonomeae, Cocoeae, Podococceae, and Hyophorbeae. We analyzed this large clade to test the monophyly of tribe Areceae with nuclear data, to explore relationships among its subtribes, and to identify other monophyletic groups. For 54 palm species, including members of all 17 subtribes of tribe Areceae, we sequenced regions of the malate synthase (MS) and phosphoribulokinase (PRK) genes. Simultaneous analysis of these regions revealed 52 shortest trees, all of which resolved tribe Areceae as polyphyletic. Subtribes Iguanurinae, Dypsidinae, Oncospermatinae, and Arecinae were also resolved as polyphyletic. A clade of Indo-Pacific taxa was resolved with strong support, and would be a suitable target for more focused study. Received February 7, 2001; accepted April 9, 2002 Published online: December 3, 2002     

Molecular tests of phylogenetic taxonomies: a general procedure and example using four subfamilies of the lizard family Iguanidae

A general procedure is described for examining when results of molecular phylogenetic analyses warrant formal revision of taxonomies constructed using morphological characters. We illustrate this procedure with tests of monophyly for four subfamilies in the lizard family Iguanidae using 1561 aligned base positions (838 phylogenetically informative) of mitochondrial DNA sequences, representing coding regions for eight tRNAs, ND2, and portions of ND1 and COI. Ten new sequences ranging in length from 1732 to 1751 bases are compared with 12 previously reported sequences and 67 morphological characters (54 phylogenetically informative) from the literature. New morphological character states are provided for Sator. Phylogenies derived from the molecular and combined data are in agreement but both conflict with phylogenetic inferences from the morphological data alone. Strong support is found for the monophyly of the subfamilies Crotaphytinae and Phrynosomatinae. Monophyly of the Iguaninae is weakly supported in each analysis. All analyses suggest that the Tropidurinae is not monophyletic but the hypothesis of monophyly cannot be rejected. A phylogenetic taxonomy is proposed in which the Tropidurinae* is maintained as a metataxon (denoted with an asterisk), for which monophyly has not been demonstrated. Within the Phrynosomatinae, the close relationship of Sator and Sceloporus is questioned and an alternative hypothesis in which Sator is the sister taxon to a clade comprising Petrosaurus, Sceloporus, and Urosaurus is presented. Statistical tests of monophyly provide a powerful way to evaluate support for taxonomic groupings. Use of the metataxon prevents premature taxonomic rearrangements where support is lacking.     

Phylogenetics of Cranichideae with emphasis on Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae): evidence from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences

DNA sequences from plastid rbcL and matK genes and the trnL-F region, as well as the nuclear ribosomal ITS region, were used to evaluate monophyly and subtribal delimitation of Cranichideae and generic relationships in Spiranthinae. Cranichideae are moderately supported as monophyletic, with Chloraeinae and Pterostylis-Megastylis indicated as their collective sisters. Within Cranichideae, Pachyplectroninae and Goodyerinae form a well-supported monophyletic group sister to a "core spiranthid" clade that includes, according to their branching order, Galeottiellinae, Manniellinae, and a Prescottiinae-Cranichidinae-Spiranthinae subclade. Inclusion of Galeottiella in Spiranthinae, as in previous classifications, renders the latter paraphyletic to all other spiranthid subtribes. Cranichidinae and Spiranthinae (minus Galeottiella) are monophyletic and strongly supported, but Prescottiinae form a grade that includes a strongly supported prescottioid Andean clade and a weakly supported Prescottia-Cranichidinae clade sister to Spiranthinae. Well-supported major clades in Spiranthinae identified in this study do not correspond to previous alliances or the narrowly defined subtribes in which they have been divided recently. Morphological characters, especially those that have been used for taxonomic delimitation in Cranichideae, are discussed against the framework of the molecular trees, emphasizing putative synapomorphies and problems derived from lack of information or inadequate interpretation of the characters.     

An evaluation of support for order-level monophyly and interrelationships within the class Demospongiae using partial data from the large subunit rDNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I

Large subunit ribosomal DNA (LSU rDNA) sequence data from 120 taxa and cytochrome oxidase subunit 1(COI) sequence data from 27 taxa are analyzed separately and together to estimate the internal phylogeny of the class Demospongiae and to evaluate how consistent these data are with pre-existing hypotheses of relationship concerning order-level monophyly and relationships. The monophyly of Porifera is only slightly inconsistent with LSU data, which do not support the monophyly of the class Demospongiae regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of Homoscleromopha (this result is likely due to the placement of a single hexactinellid taxon within the Demospongiae), however, no LSU support is found for the monophyly of Silicea (Demospongiae+Hexactinellida) unless homoscleromorphs are excluded. Neither the subclasses Ceractinomorpha and Tetractinomorpha, nor the orders Halichondrida, Hadromerida, and Haplosclerida are supported as monophyletic under any data partition. The haplosclerid suborders Haplosclerina and Petrosina are supported as monophyletic to the exclusion of the suborder Spongillina, and the orders Dictyoceratida, Verongida, Poecilosclerida, Astrophorida, Spirophorida, Homosclerophorida, and Agelasida are largely reconstructed as monophyletic, with the exception of few anomalously placed taxa. Few inter-order relationships are strongly supported by any data partition, but there is moderate support for a verongid+chondrosid clade and a tetractinellid+halichondrid clade. Furthermore, LSU data strongly support the existence of two novel clades that do not correspond to the existing classification and that show no morphological uniformity. Finally, every data partition supports the monophyly of a clade that includes the order Agelasida, some members of the genus Axinella, and two taxa tentatively identified as belonging to the orders Hadromerida and Halichondrida.     

Molecular Phylogeny of Mobilid and Sessilid Ciliates Symbiotic in Eastern Pacific Limpets (Mollusca: Patellogastropoda)

The phylogenetic relationships of the ciliate subclass Peritrichia, composed of the orders Mobilida and Sessilida, have recently come under debate as morphological and molecular analyses have struck contrasting conclusions as to the monophyly of the group. We provide additional molecular data to assess the monophyly of the Peritrichia by sequencing the small subunit ribosomal RNA genes of two symbiotic peritrichs, Urceolaria korschelti and Scyphidia ubiquita, found inhabiting the mantle cavity of limpets. Although phylogenetic analyses indicated a nonmonophyletic Peritrichia, approximately unbiased tests revealed that the monophyletic hypothesis could not be rejected. With regard to the Mobilida, our analysis showed divergence within the family Trichodinidae related to host taxa—a molluscan clade and a fish clade. For the Sessilida, the family Scyphidiidae was sister to the Astylozoidae. In our sampling of U. korschelti and S. ubiquita, both species showed significant genetic divergence among geographically isolated, yet morphologically indistinguishable populations. We hypothesize that cryptic speciation has produced these morphologically identical species and argue that more extensive genomic analyses are required to fully assess the monophyly, biogeography, and ultimately biodiversity of the peritrichs.     

Analysis of Ribosomal RNA Genes Suggests That Trypanosomes Are Monophyletic

To further investigate the phylogeny of protozoa from the order Kinetoplastida we have sequenced the small subunit (SSU) and a portion of the large subunit (LSU) nuclear rRNA genes. The SSU and LSU sequences were determined from a lizard trypanosome, Trypanosoma scelopori and a bodonid, Rhynchobodo sp., and the LSU sequences were determined from an insect trypanosomatid, Crithidia oncopelti, and a bodonid, Dimastigella trypaniformis. Contrary to previous results, in which trypanosomes were found to be paraphyletic, with Trypanosoma brucei representing the earliest-diverging lineage, we have now found evidence for the monophyly of trypanosomes. Addition of new taxa which subdivide long branches (such as that of T. brucei) have helped to identify homoplasies responsible for the paraphyletic trees in previous studies. Although the monophyly of the trypanosome clade is supported in the bootstrap analyses for maximum likelihood at 97% and maximum parsimony at 92%, there is only a small difference in ln-likelihood value or tree length between the most optimal monophyletic tree and the best suboptimal paraphyletic tree. Within the trypanosomatid subtree, the clade of trypanosomes is a sister group to the monophyletic clade of the nontrypanosome genera. Different groups of trypanosomes group on the tree according to their mode of transmission. This suggests that the adaptation to invertebrate vectors plays a more important role in the trypanosome evolution than the adaptation to vertebrate hosts. Received: 5 July 1996 / Accepted: 26 September 1996     

Phylogenetic relationships of the anamorphic genus <Emphasis Type="Italic">Fusicladium</Emphasis> s. lat. as inferred by ITS nrDNA data

The genus Fusicladium s. lat. (incl. Pollaccia and Spilocaea) was phylogenetically analysed using ITS nrDNA sequences. Pollaccia and Spilocaea did not form monophyletic groups of their own, but were intermingled between Fusicladium species, together with which they formed a monophyletic clade. Thus, Pollaccia and Spilocaea should be included in a wider genus concept of Fusicladium, constituting a morphologically variable genus. Furthermore, all Venturia and Fusicladium isolates clustered together on the bases of available ITS data, providing support for the monophyly of the anamorphic genus Fusicladium and the teleomorphic genus Venturia. Within this clade several subclades can be recognized. All taxa on the host family Salicaceae were found in one subclade. Three other subclades comprised taxa on Rosaceae whereas taxa on other host families all clustered separately. Geographic specializations were not observed. Two examples of host switching could be demonstrated, but these were confined to instances involving host species belonging to the same family. Fusicladium convolvularum and F. effusum, two species with unknown teleomorphs, clustered within the Fusicladium/Venturia clade, supporting the correct placement of these taxa in Fusicladium. The placement of Pseudocladosporium hachijoense within the family Venturiaceae was also supported.