前列腺特异性抗原在前列腺癌诊断中的应用进展

已经证明,前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）是一种有价值的前列腺癌（PCa)肿瘤标记物,血清PSA的广泛使用提高了前列腺癌的检出率,使晚期癌患得明显减少。然而,PSA对PCa的检测缺乏特异性,由于其高的假阳性率,引起许多不必要的活检。为了提高PSA对PCa诊断的特异性,降低不必要的活检,众多学正在探讨与PSA相关的几项参数的临床应用价值,本就此作一综述。     

Newer potential biomarkers in prostate cancer

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has led to a significant rise in the number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer and an associated increase in biopsies performed. Despite its limitations, including a positive predictive value of only 25%-40%, PSA remains the only generally accepted biomarker for prostate cancer. There is a need for better tools to not only identify men with prostate cancer, but also to recognize those with potentially lethal disease who will benefit from intervention. A great deal of work has been done worldwide to improve our knowledge of the genetics behind prostate cancer and the specificity of PSA by developing assays for different PSA isoforms. Common genetic alterations in prostate cancer patients have been identified, including CpG hypermethylation of GSPT1 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion. Serum and urine detection of RNA biomarkers (eg, PCA3) and prostate cancer tissue protein antibodies (eg, EPCA) are being evaluated for detection and prognostic tools. This article reviews some of the promising developments in biomarkers.     

On the clinical usefulness of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio

The free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (F/T PSA) is associated with the presence of prostate cancer and is thus used as an indicator for suspicion of prostate cancer and as a determinant for biopsy. We reviewed a recent retrospective series of 966 consecutive prostate biopsies where F/T PSA was blindly determined and did not influence biopsy indication. We simulated the association of F/T PSA with biopsy outcome and its impact as a biopsy determinant. When adopting an F/T PSA cutoff of 10%, 13%, 16% or 20% among random sextant biopsies in the 4-10 ng/mL total PSA range, the sensitivity was 15%, 37%, 55% and 72% and the specificity 89%, 80%, 64% and 44%, respectively. Using F/T PSA as a biopsy determinant, from 1.7 to 2.6 cancer biopsies would have been delayed to avoid 10 benign biopsies. As this balance is not acceptable, F/T PSA has no role as a biopsy indicator and its clinical use is questionable.     

Optimisation de l’utilisation du PSA

PSA is a tumor marker usually determined for prostate cancer at diagnosis for its pronostic value and at therapy follow-up. But lack of specificity of PSA for prostate cancer and variability between assays demonstrated by the quality program survey make this marker not valuable in mass screening program. Market control of Afssaps on analysis devices of PSA showed a correct harmonization for total PSA. Biological tools available and easy to perform could improve ability of PSA for early detection of prostate cancer at a curable stage without induction of unnecessary biopsies prescribed because elevated total PSA values.     

Prostate cancer: risk assessment and diagnostic approaches

The successful treatment of prostate cancer relies on detection of the disease at its earliest stages. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening has been a significant advance in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, identifying specific genetic alterations in a given family or patient will allow more appropriate screening for early disease. Mapping and identification of specific prostate cancer susceptibility genes is slowly becoming a reality. Other prostate cancer risks include a family history, race, and possibly serum markers such as insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Once a high-risk man is identified, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies are the standard to diagnose prostate cancer. Although TRUS is an advance over traditional digitally directed biopsies, it represents a random sampling of the prostate since most lesions cannot be visualized. Newer modalities such as ultrasound contrast agents, pattern recognition, and artificial neural networks (ANNs), applied to TRUS images, may improve diagnostic accuracy. If a man at risk for prostate cancer has undergone a negative TRUS biopsy, the decision for the need for additional biopsies is problematic. Use of PSA derivatives such as free and total PSA and the initial biopsy abnormalities such as atypia or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia may define those patients in need of follow-up biopsy.     

Trends in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing and prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Australia: A critical analysis

BackgroundPopulation trends in PSA testing and prostate cancer incidence do not perfectly correspond. We aimed to better understand relationships between trends in PSA testing, prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Australia and factors that influence them.MethodsWe calculated and described standardised time trends in PSA tests, prostate biopsies, treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Australia in men aged 45–74, 75–84, and 85 + years.ResultsPSA testing increased from its introduction in 1989 to a peak in 2008 before declining in men aged 45–84 years. Prostate biopsies and cancer incidence fell from 1995 to 2000 in parallel with decrease in trans-urethral resections of the prostate (TURP) and, latterly, changes in pharmaceutical management of BPH. After 2000, changes in biopsies and incidence paralleled changes in PSA screening in men 45–84 years, while in men ≥85 years biopsy rates stabilised, and incidence fell. Prostate cancer mortality in men aged 45–74 years remained low throughout. Mortality in men 75–84 years gradually increased until mid 1990s, then gradually decreased. Mortality in men ≥ 85 years increased until mid 1990s, then stabilised.ConclusionAge specific prostate cancer incidence largely mirrors PSA testing rates. Most deviation from this pattern may be explained by less use of TURP in management of BPH and consequent less incidental cancer detection in TURP tissue specimens. Mortality from prostate cancer initially rose and then fell below what it was when PSA testing began. Its initial rise and fall may be explained by a possible initial tendency to over-attribute deaths of uncertain cause in older men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer to prostate cancer. Decreases in mortality rates were many fold smaller than the increases in incidence, suggesting substantial overdiagnosis of prostate cancer after introduction of PSA testing.     

Cancer de la prostate : la maladie localisée

Localized prostate cancer is characterized by a tumor confined to the prostate gland at clinical evaluation. Since the onset of PSA screening, the detection of localized prostate cancer has increased. Prognosis factors are clinical stadification, PSA value, PSA doubling time, tumor volume related to needle biopsy pathologic findings (Gleason score, percentage biopsies involved). Treatment depends on tumor prognosis, symptoms and performance status of the patient. Localized prostate cancer can be treated by surgery (radical prostatectomy, high intensity focused ultrasound) or radiotherapy (conformational radiation therapy, brachytherapy). Active follow-up can be proposed to very low risk patients.     

Atypical prostatic glandular proliferations on needle biopsy: Diagnostic implications, use of immunohistochemistry, and clinical significance

In recent times, PSA screening and a substantial increase in prostate needle biopsies have not only resulted in detection of minute foci of cancer but have also very likely resulted in increased detection of atypical glandular proliferations. Not uncommonly, there are only a limited number of atypical glands in these biopsies, and these require careful evaluation to enable an accurate diagnosis. We describe diagnostic implications, use of immunohistochemistry, and clinical significance of these lesions. Foci of atypical glands, also labeled atypical small acinar proliferation of uncertain significance, have features suspicious for but not diagnostic of cancer. Atypical foci include a broad group of lesions of differing clinical significance. These include benign, small acinar proliferations mimicking prostate cancer and atypical glandular proliferations suspicious for carcinoma. Definite diagnosis requires accurate histopathologic assessment and judicious use of immunohistochemistry. Patients with atypical glands on prostate needle biopsy have a high risk for harboring cancer and therefore have an increased risk for having cancer detected in subsequent biopsies.     

Tomato sauce supplementation and prostate cancer: lycopene accumulation and modulation of biomarkers of carcinogenesis

As part of a randomized placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of lycopene supplementation on DNA damage in men with prostate cancer, a nonrandomized 5th arm using tomato sauce was included and reported here. Thirty-two patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma consumed tomato sauce-based pasta dishes for 3 weeks (30 mg of lycopene/day) before their scheduled radical prostatectomy. Prostate tissue was obtained as biopsies at baseline and as resected tissue at the time of the prostatectomy. Serum and prostate lycopene, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations, and leukocyte DNA 8-OH-deoxyguanosine/deoxyguanosine (8OHdG) were measured at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Cancer cells in paraffin sections of prostate biopsies and postintervention resected tissue were compared for 8OHdG staining and for apoptosis. Adherence to the daily consumption of tomato-based entrees was 81.6% of the intended dose, and serum and prostate lycopene concentrations increased 1.97- and 2.92-fold (P < 0.001), respectively. Mean serum PSA concentrations decreased by 17.5% (P < 0.002) and leukocyte 8OHdG decreased by 21.3% (P < 0.005) after tomato sauce consumption. Resected tissues from tomato sauce-supplemented patients had 28.3% lower prostate 8OHdG compared with the nonstudy control group (P < 0.03). Cancer cell 8OHdG staining of Gleason Score-matched resected prostate sections was reduced by 40.5% in mean nuclear density (P < 0.005) and by 36.4% in mean area (P < 0.018) compared with the presupplementation biopsy. Apoptotic index was higher in hyperplastic and neoplastic cells in the resected tissue after supplementation. These data taken as a whole indicate significant uptake of lycopene into prostate tissue and a reduction in DNA damage in both leukocyte and prostate tissue. Whether reduction in DNA damage to prostate cancer cells is beneficial awaits further research, although reduction in serum PSA concentrations is promising.     

Improved prostate cancer detection with a human kallikrein 11 and percentage free PSA-based artificial neural network

Human kallikrein 11 (hK11) was evaluated in a percentage free PSA-based artificial neural network (ANN) to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Serum samples from 357 patients with (n=132) and without (n=225) prostate cancer (PCa) were analyzed and ANN models were constructed and compared to all parameters. The discriminatory power of hK11 was lower than that of PSA, but receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses demonstrated significantly larger areas under the curves for the ANN compared to all other parameters. ANNs with hK11 may lead to a further reduction in unnecessary prostate biopsies, especially when analyzing patients with less than 15% free PSA.     

Prostate Cancer Specificity of PCA3 Gene Testing: Examples from Clinical Practice

A specific marker for early prostate cancer would fill an important void. In initial evaluations of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene vis-à-vis serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, the gene offers great promise. At the cellular level, PCA3 specificity for cancer is nearly perfect because of the gross overexpression of the gene by cancer cells. As a clinical test for early prostate cancer, heightened specificity is also seen in urine containing prostate cells from men with the disease. PCA3 gene testing holds valuable potential in PSA quandary situations: (1) men with elevated PSA levels but no cancer on initial biopsy; (2) men found to have cancer despite normal levels of PSA; (3) men with PSA elevations associated with varying degrees of prostatitis; and (4) men undergoing active surveillance for presumed microfocal disease.     

Correlation of modified Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of biopsy grade with age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy tumor extent using the conventional and modified Gleason grading systems. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 828 consecutive needle biopsy specimens of prostate carcinoma were collected from the years 1995 and 2000 (graded with conventional Gleason grading) and 2006 and 2007 (graded with modified Gleason grading). RESULTS: Both conventional and modified Gleason grading correlated with age, serum PSA, percent positive biopsies and percent cancer length. In 2006-2007, the patients were on average younger and more biopsy cores were taken per patient. Serum PSA and percent positive cores were lower than in the 1995 and 2000 group, indicating a stage shift downward, but the Gleason scores were nevertheless higher. CONCLUSION: Conventional and modified Gleason grading both correlated with age, serum PSA and cancer involvement in needle biopsies. With modified Gleason grading there is a grade shift upward despite the downstaging that has been observed in recent years.     

High-throughput transcriptomic and RNAi analysis identifies AIM1, ERGIC1, TMED3 and TPX2 as potential drug targets in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases and there is a need for more efficient and targeted methods of treatment. In this study, the potential of gene expression data and RNA interference technique were combined to advance future personalized prostate cancer therapeutics. To distinguish the most promising in vivo prevalidated prostate cancer drug targets, a bioinformatic analysis was carried out using genome-wide gene expression data from 9873 human tissue samples. In total, 295 genes were selected for further functional studies in cultured prostate cancer cells due to their high mRNA expression in prostate, prostate cancer or in metastatic prostate cancer samples. Second, RNAi based cell viability assay was performed in VCaP and LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Based on the siRNA results, gene expression patterns in human tissues and novelty, endoplasmic reticulum function associated targets AIM1, ERGIC1 and TMED3, as well as mitosis regulating TPX2 were selected for further validation. AIM1, ERGIC1, and TPX2 were shown to be highly expressed especially in prostate cancer tissues, and high mRNA expression of ERGIC1 and TMED3 associated with AR and ERG oncogene expression. ERGIC1 silencing specifically regulated the proliferation of ERG oncogene positive prostate cancer cells and inhibited ERG mRNA expression in these cells, indicating that it is a potent drug target in ERG positive subgroup of prostate cancers. TPX2 expression associated with PSA failure and TPX2 silencing reduced PSA expression, indicating that TPX2 regulates androgen receptor mediated signaling. In conclusion, the combinatorial usage of microarray and RNAi techniques yielded in a large number of potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets, for future development of targeted and personalized approaches for prostate cancer management.     

Pathological and molecular mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis: implications for diagnosis, detection, prevention, and treatment

Prostate cancer is an increasing threat throughout the world. As a result of a demographic shift in population, the number of men at risk for developing prostate cancer is growing rapidly. For 2002, an estimated 189,000 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the U.S., accompanied by an estimated 30,200 prostate cancer deaths [Jemal et al., 2002]. Most prostate cancer is now diagnosed in men who were biopsied as a result of an elevated serum PSA (>4 ng/ml) level detected following routine screening. Autopsy studies [Breslow et al., 1977; Yatani et al., 1982; Sakr et al., 1993], and the recent results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) [Thompson et al., 2003], a large scale clinical trial where all men entered the trial without an elevated PSA (<3 ng/ml) were subsequently biopsied, indicate the prevalence of histologic prostate cancer is much higher than anticipated by PSA screening. Environmental factors, such as diet and lifestyle, have long been recognized contributors to the development of prostate cancer. Recent studies of the molecular alterations in prostate cancer cells have begun to provide clues as to how prostate cancer may arise and progress. For example, while inflammation in the prostate has been suggested previously as a contributor to prostate cancer development [Gardner and Bennett, 1992; Platz, 1998; De Marzo et al., 1999; Nelson et al., 2003], research regarding the genetic and pathological aspects of prostate inflammation has only recently begun to receive attention. Here, we review the subject of inflammation and prostate cancer as part of a "chronic epithelial injury" hypothesis of prostate carcinogenesis, and the somatic genome and phenotypic changes characteristic of prostate cancer cells. We also present the implications of these changes for prostate cancer diagnosis, detection, prevention, and treatment.     

The 4Kscore? Test Reduces Prostate Biopsy Rates in Community and Academic Urology Practices

There is significant concern regarding prostate cancer screening because of the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment of men who are discovered to have abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) results. The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, LLC) is a blood test that utilizes four kallikrein levels plus clinical information in an algorithm to calculate an individual’s percentage risk (< 1% to > 95%) for aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7) on prostate biopsy. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test after abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results, has been shown to improve the specificity for predicting the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. A clinical utility study was conducted to assess the influence of the 4Kscore Test on the decision to perform prostate biopsies in men referred to urologists for abnormal PSA and/or DRE results. The study population included 611 patients seen by 35 academic and community urologists in the United States. Urologists ordered the 4Kscore Test as part of their assessment of men referred for abnormal PSA and/or DRE test results. Results for the patients were stratified into low risk (< 7.5%), intermediate risk (7.5%–19.9%), and high risk (≥ 20%) for aggressive prostate cancer. The 4Kscore Test results influenced biopsy decisions in 88.7% of the men. Performing the 4Kscore Test resulted in a 64.6% reduction in prostate biopsies in patients; the actual percentage of cases not proceeding to biopsy were 94.0%, 52.9%, and 19.0% for men who had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk 4Kscore Test results, respectively. A higher 4Kscore Test was associated with greater likelihood of having a prostate biopsy (P < 0.001). Among the 171 patients who had a biopsy, the 4Kscore risk category is strongly associated with biopsy pathology. The 4Kscore Test, as a follow-up test for an abnormal PSA and/or DRE results, significantly influenced the physician and patient shared decision in clinical practice, which led to a reduction in prostate biopsies while increasing the probability of detecting aggressive cancer.Key Words: Prostate cancer, Prostate-specific antigen, Digital rectal examination, Biopsy rate, Gleason score, 4Kscore Test, Prostate cancer prognosisWidespread screening for prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) began in 1991, and subsequently a 45% decline in prostate cancer mortality has been observed.¹ A recent large European randomized clinical trial also reported a 29% reduction in death from prostate cancer in men undergoing routine screening.² However, because of a US study that showed no mortality benefits to organized PSA screening,³ and the net physical and psychologic burden of secondary adverse events triggered by PSA testing versus the number of lives saved, the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recently advised against routine PSA screening for prostate cancer.⁴ The concern of the USPSTF is based on the fact that most men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a tumor that is unlikely to pose a threat to life expectancy. A recent systematic analysis suggested that up to 60% of prostate cancers diagnosed in contemporary studies might be safely observed without a need for immediate intervention.⁵One of the primary challenges for urologists is the potential for under-grading of Gleason 6 prostate cancer due to biopsy sampling error; as a result, up to 90% of men with a Gleason 6 prostate cancer still proceed to prostate cancer treatment despite the advent of active surveillance programs. Approximately 66% of patients who are diagnosed with Gleason 6 disease at biopsy will be confirmed to have Gleason 6 cancer after radical prostatectomy.⁶ Some of these men are considered to have undergone overtreatment, because Gleason 6 cancer is not considered life threatening.⁷ This subset of men has the potential for developing complications following surgery, including erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and changes in health-related quality of life with disruption of psychologic, sexual, and urinary function.^8–12The prostate biopsy procedure is invasive, and has significant costs and complications such as bleeding, urinary retention, and life-threatening infection. A recent population-based study from Ontario, Canada, revealed a fourfold increase to 4.1% for the rate of hospital admissions after prostate biopsy from 1996 to 2005, with 72% of admissions due to infection.¹³ These risks, combined with the anxiety involved in undergoing the procedure, present a significant burden to any man considering prostate cancer screening.The impact of the USPSTF has been a decrease in overall biopsy rates with a subsequent decline in the detection rate of Gleason 7 to 10 high-grade prostate cancers.¹⁴ The elimination of PSA screening means that the 20% to 30% of men who would have presented with an abnormal PSA level and been found to have high-grade prostate cancer may lose an opportunity for a possible cure.¹⁵ Clearly, there is a need for better risk-stratification tools for men presenting with an abnormal PSA level and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) result in order to both reduce the number of prostate biopsies performed and decrease the rate of Gleason 6 diagnosis and treatment.⁶The 4Kscore® Test (OPKO Diagnostics, LLC) incorporates measured blood levels of four kallikrein proteins: total PSA, free PSA, intact PSA, and human kallikrein 2 plus clinical information (age, DRE findings, and a history of prior negative biopsy result) into a proprietary algorithm to calculate an individual man’s percentage risk (< 1% to > 95%) of having Gleason score ≥ 7 if a prostate biopsy were to be performed. The 4Kscore Test has been extensively validated through a total of 12 prospective and retrospective studies published in peer-reviewed journals involving over 22,000 patients from both the United States and Europe.^16–23 These studies of men with elevated PSA levels involved cohorts of unscreened and screened men, and those with negative prior prostate biopsy results. Based on analyses published in these studies, the 4Kscore Test would have theoretically resulted in a 45% reduction in prostate biopsies while delaying the diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer in only a few men (1.3%–4.7%).The 4Kscore Test is used to accurately determine percentage risk for aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7) and provide additional information for men being considered for prostate biopsy because of abnormal PSA levels and/or DRE results. This allows urologists to better risk stratify men for biopsy and ultimately results in more selective treatment of those men with aggressive disease. Conversely, those men not harboring life-threatening disease are able to safely avoid prostate biopsy and overtreatment of indolent disease.With the introduction of any new diagnostic test such as the 4Kscore Test into clinical practice, it is important to assess whether its implementation, in this case as a follow-up test for an abnormal PSA and/or DRE result, influences and changes the physician-patient shared decision-making process and leads to an actual reduction in prostate biopsies. Herein we evaluated the influence of the 4Kscore Test on urologist-patient decisions about proceeding with biopsy in men who have an abnormal PSA and/or DRE result from multiple academic and community urology clinical practices in the United States.     

The results after transrectal prostate biopsy with 12 biopsy cores taken

This report describes the clinical value of transrectal prostate biopsy during which 12 biopsy cores are taken in comparison to the classical sextant method. There were 106 patients included in the study, who had transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) due to abnormal finding after digitorectal examination (DRE) and/or values of PSA > 4 ng/ml in the period from 4 October 2001 till 14 August 2002. There were 117 biopsies with 12 biopsy cores taken, 6 cores from each lobe. Prostate cancer was confirmed in 49 patients (46%). Out of total number of confirmed cancer cases, initial biopsy detected 94%. There were three patients who had suspicious DRE finding, with PSA value of < 4 ng/ml, but cancer was not detected in any of them. In the patient group with PSA value between 4-10 ng/ml, cancer was detected in 26% of them and in the group with PSA value > 10 ng/ml cancer was detected in 58%. The most common Gleason score in the case of cancer was 7 (43%). During the biopsy procedure, 3 patients experienced strong vasovagal reactions, meaning that out of 117 biopsies incidence of complications was 2.6%. Few days after the biopsy, two patients developed urogenital tract infections (1.7%) and right after the procedure, there was one case of strong hematuria (0.8%) and strong rectal bleeding (0,8%) that needed hospitalization. Our results regarding the incidence of complications do not differ much from the results in the literature. According to data in the literature regarding sextant biopsy, 15-34% of cancer cases remain undiagnosed at initial biopsy. The method of 12 biopsy cores fails to diagnose only 6% of all cancers, but it is important to note that in the mentioned period, re-biopsy was indicated only in 11 from 60 patients with negative biopsies.