Management of clinically localized prostate cancer

Critics of screening have stated that early detection of prostate cancer does not necessarily reflect a diminishing death rate from the disease. However, several recent reports have demonstrated that the death rate from prostate cancer is decreasing, representing the most compelling validation for aggressive screening. Prostate cancer can be halted only if there is no evidence of systemic or regional metastases and the disease is confined to the surgical field or the radiation template. Surgeons and radiation oncologists must make a concerted effort to exclude men with regional and systemic metastases who are unlikely to benefit from treatment. With the widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen screening, a greater proportion of men are being diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer. Both radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are able to halt disease spread in this significant subset of men, but survival outcomes indicate that radical prostatectomy is a more reliable treatment than radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Overall, the immediate treatment-related morbidity of radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in the modern era is quite low. Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy appear to have a similar impact on continence and erectile function. There is a need for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies that can be utilized in those cases where radical prostatectomy and radiation are less likely to completely eradicate or destroy the cancer.     

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radical prostatectomy

The most common treatment options for men with clinically localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The choice between these options is often controversial, and selecting the optimal treatment poses a great challenge for patients and physicians. Factors important to the decision include age and life expectancy of the patient, the natural history of the prostate cancer, how curable the disease is, and the morbidity of treatment. Use of these criteria to select treatment for a healthy, 70-year-old man presenting with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum prostate-specific antigen of 12 ng/mL, and an adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 8 that is present in 2 of 12 biopsy cores would lead to the choice of radical prostatectomy over radiation therapy. Data show that such a patient has a life expectancy of more than 12.3 years if the prostate cancer can be cured and a high probability of dying from the disease if it is not cured. Data further show that radical prostatectomy in such a patient would confer a survival advantage over radiation therapy without resulting in greater complications or reduction in quality of life.     

Le cancer de la prostate: Acquis et challenges pour l'an 2000

Principles of the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer at any stage are still improving. Early diagnosis is accessible throughout the use of the PSA test associated with digital rectal examination which lead to indicate transrectal biopsies. This allowed to treat patients at an earlier stage and significantly improved prognosis in the case of organ confined disease. Progress made in the radical prostatectomy technique have contributed to decrease the postoperative morbidity and is the treatment of reference in clinically localized disease. Radiation therapy still remains a valuable alternative, however, results are more difficult to evaluate. Hormonal treatment using androgen deprivation is indicated at the stage of metastasis. LHRH agonist associated with anti antiandrogens are as much efficacious as surgical castration. Unfortunately, the prognosis of advanced disease remains unpredictable. Objectives for the future will be to improve the diagnostic and staging of prostate cancer et to better define therapeutic indications; better understand the effects of androgen deprivation; and to propose new therapies for hormone refractory cancers.     

Pathological Features of Localized Prostate Cancer in China: A Contemporary Analysis of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

There has been a rapid increase in the incidence of prostate cancer in China, especially in areas with boosted economic development. In this study, we analyzed the pathological features of a contemporary series of radical prostatectomy cases. A total of 230 consecutive, whole-mounted radical prostatectomy specimens collected from 2012 to 2014 were reviewed. The median age of the patients was 68 years, and 64.3% of patients presented with prostate specific antigen alone. Pathological examination indicated that a high proportion (77.4%) of patients had intermediate- or high-risk disease according to the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical score. After surgery, only 28 patients met the criteria for active surveillance (organ-confined Gleason ≥6 disease). The Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance criteria achieved a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 98.0% for identifying candidates. The probability of Gleason score upgrading was 24.8% in the entire group and 59.0% in biopsy-confirmed Gleason ≥6 disease. The predominant tumor was located in the transition zone in 14.8% of cases, while only three patients (1.3%) had a predominant tumor located in the anterior region. Patients with transition zone-predominant tumor were likely to have been referred with urinary symptoms and high prostate specific antigen levels. The results of this study highlight the contemporary pathological features of localized prostate cancer in urban China. There was an increased trend towards asymptomatic cases, though most patients had intermediate- or high-risk disease and were suitable for definitive treatment. The low prevalence of dominant cancer in the anterior region may reflect race-based pathological differences.     

A review of surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy

Since the early 20th century, radical prostatectomy has been used in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, before the widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen screening, the majority of cancers were clinically advanced and not amenable to cure, so relatively few men were candidates for this procedure. Modern advances have contributed dramatically to the reduction of complications and morbidity associated with radical prostatectomy. As a result, the procedure has become the most common treatment selected by men with localized prostate cancer. This article reviews several issues regarding radical prostatectomy, including surgical techniques, cancer control, intraoperative localization of the cavernous nerves, patient selection, and laparoscopic versus robotic approaches.     

Clinical experience with gene therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer

Localized prostate cancer can be treated effectively with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. The treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer are limited to hormonal therapy; hormone-refractory cancer is treated with taxane-based chemotherapy, which provides only a modest survival benefit. New treatments are needed. The gene for the initiation of prostate cancer has not been identified; however, gene therapy can involve tumor injection of a gene to kill cells, systemic gene delivery to target and kill metastases, or local gene expression intended to generate a systemic response. This review will provide an overview of the various strategies of cancer gene therapy, focusing on those that have gone to clinical trial, detailing clinical experience in prostate cancer patients.     

Cancer de la prostate : la maladie localisée

Localized prostate cancer is characterized by a tumor confined to the prostate gland at clinical evaluation. Since the onset of PSA screening, the detection of localized prostate cancer has increased. Prognosis factors are clinical stadification, PSA value, PSA doubling time, tumor volume related to needle biopsy pathologic findings (Gleason score, percentage biopsies involved). Treatment depends on tumor prognosis, symptoms and performance status of the patient. Localized prostate cancer can be treated by surgery (radical prostatectomy, high intensity focused ultrasound) or radiotherapy (conformational radiation therapy, brachytherapy). Active follow-up can be proposed to very low risk patients.     

High-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer: is monotherapy adequate?

High-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer represents a diverse disease entity. Patients who are considered to be at highest risk for biochemical failure after localized treatments may not be at significant risk for disea-sespecific mortality. In this review, an attempt will be made to define high-risk status and help identify patients at high risk for mortality after a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. Subsequently, a review of monotherapy approaches as well as previously successful strategies utilizing multimodality therapy for high-risk disease will be presented. Finally, a synopsis will be given of several ongoing randomized clinical trials using the most effective systemic therapies in the adjuvant setting following thorough local treatments such as radical prostatectomy. This review will provide a glimpse into the future and describe the tools that it is hoped will improve further upon the results of surgical monotherapy for high-risk, localized prostate cancer.     

Cavernous nerve reconstruction to preserve erectile function following non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer remains a problem that deters many men from seeking surgical treatment. Sparing the cavernous nerves has been popularized as a method of preserving potency, but men with locally advanced disease may be at increased risk for positive margins with this technique. In this study, sural nerve grafting of the cavernous nerve bundles, to preserve postoperative potency while potentially maximizing cancer control, was examined. Thirty men were enrolled in this prospective phase I study and underwent non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy performed by one of two protocol surgeons. Preoperative erectile function was assessed both objectively, using a RigiScan (Timm Medical Technologies, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minn.), and subjectively. The cavernous nerves were identified and resected during the operation with the use of an intraoperative mapping device (CaverMap; Alliant Medical Technologies, Norwood, Mass.). Bilateral autologous sural nerve grafting to the cavernous nerve stumps was performed by one of two protocol plastic surgeons. Postoperative erectile dysfunction therapy, using intracorporeal injection, a vacuum pump, and/or oral sildenafil therapy, was instituted 6 weeks after the operation. Spontaneous erectile activity was subjectively and objectively measured every 3 months after the operation. Follow-up periods ranged from 13 to 33 months (mean, 23 months). Overall, 18 of 30 patients (60 percent) demonstrated both objective and subjective evidence of spontaneous erectile activity. Of those 18 men, 13 (72 percent) were able to have intercourse (seven unassisted and six with the aid of sildenafil). No disease or biochemical recurrences have been noted in this group of patients with locally advanced disease. In conclusion, autologous sural nerve grafting after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is an effective means of preserving spontaneous erectile activity after the operation while maximizing cancer control potential.     

Experience with 125I brachytherapy as a radical treatment for prostate cancer at the Russian X-ray Radiology Research Center

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies among males. 125I brachytherapy is a current, effective, comparatively safe, and easy-to-reproduce treatment. The Russian X-ray Radiology Research Center has implanted 125I microsources in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer since 2003; 689 125I implantations were performed in the past year. Tumor-specific survival after brachytherapy did not differ greatly from that following radical prostatectomy. Thus, brachytherapy is a current high-tech treatment for prostate cancer. This therapy shows fewer adverse postradiation effects than radiation teletherapy.     

Prostate cancer in elderly men

Due to increasing life expectancy and the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a rising number of elderly men are diagnosed with prostate cancer. Besides PSA serum levels and Gleason score, age is considered to be a key prognostic factor in terms of treatment decisions. In men older than 70 years, treatment without curative intent may deprive the frail patient of years of life. Modern radical prostatectomy techniques are associated with low perioperative morbidity, excellent clinical outcome, and documented long-term disease control. Thus, radical prostatectomy should be considered because local treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer potentially cures disease. The huge extent of PSA screening programs may lead to overdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Not every man who is diagnosed with prostate cancer will develop clinically significant disease. This has led to the concept of expectant management for screen-detected, small-volume, low-grade disease, with the intention of providing therapy for those men with disease progression.     

Minimally Invasive Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Use of Nomograms to Counsel Patients about the Choice and Probable Outcome of Therapy

Despite dramatic and recently accelerated advances in the reduction of morbidity linked to radical prostatectomies, significant short- and long-term morbidity is still associated with this surgical procedure. Currently both surgical and nonsurgical minimally invasive options are available for men with clinically localized prostate cancer, including laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and cryosurgical ablation of the prostate, with others, such as high intensity focused ultrasound, under investigation. In continued efforts to improve patient outcomes and to tailor treatment options to individual patient circumstances, nomograms have been developed and are increasingly being used by physicians and patients, alike, to guide therapeutic choices at each stage of disease. This tool predicts the possibility of successful treatment for the patient based on factors such as prostate-specific antigen levels, clinical stage of disease, and biopsy results. The current and future development, design, availability, and use of nomograms is described along with the historic and newer minimally invasive treatment options for prostate cancer.     

Treatment of localized prostate cancer

This article provides an overview of treatment of localized prostate cancer, which was discussed in detail in the second scientific session of the 16th International Prostate Cancer Update. The role of radical prostatectomy in localized disease was presented by Bob Djavan, MD. Benefits and risks of radical prostatectomy were addressed by Gerald Chodak, MD. Robert E. Donohue, MD, presented the role of radical prostatectomy in Gleason grade 8, 9, and 10 tumors. Impact of positive margins on outcomes after radical prostatectomy was presented by James A. Eastham, MD. E. David Crawford, MD, provided an overview of the role of targeted therapy. Indications and results of brachytherapy were presented by Mack Roach, III, MD. Finally, Michael J. Manyak, MD, described the evolution of radioimmunoscintigraphy and clinical outcomes data.     

Effect of L-arginine supplement on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats

Background

To assess the outcome of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy comprising complete androgen blockade followed by treatment with docetaxel and estramustine phosphate before radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients with a high risk of localized prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

Complete androgen blockade followed by 6 cycles of docetaxel (30 mg/m²) with estramustine phosphate (560 mg) were given to 18 PCa patients before radical prostatectomy. Subsequently, the clinical and pathological outcomes were analyzed.

Results

No patients had severe adverse events during chemohormonal therapy, and hence they were treated with radical prostatectomy. Two patients (11.1%) achieved pathological complete response. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. At a median follow-up of 18 months, 14 patients (77.8%) were disease-free without PSA recurrence. All 4 patients with PSA recurrence had pathologic T3b or T4 disease and 3 of these 4 patients had pathologic N1 disease.

Conclusion

We found that neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy with complete androgen blockade followed by treatment with docetaxel and estramustine phosphate before radical prostatectomy was safe, feasible, and associated with favorable pathological outcomes in patients with a high risk of localized PCa.     

Treatment options after failure of radiation therapy-a review

Radioresistant or recurrent prostate cancer represents a serious health risk for approximately 20%-30% of patients treated with primary radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The majority of patients exhibit large volume and poorly differentiated disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the ability of salvage therapy to eradicate the cancer. Early detection with serum PSA monitoring and prostate needle biopsy following primary radiation therapy may identify residual adenocarcinoma at an earlier stage and increase the likelihood of successful salvage therapy. Radical prostatectomy, prostate cryoablation, and brachytherapy comprise the options for salvage treatment available for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. The goal of disease eradication must be balanced against the potential for serious treatment-related side effects. As a result, many patients receive noncurative therapy with androgen ablation despite the real risk of disease progression and mortality.     

Current Clinical Applications of the In-capromab Pendetide Scan (ProstaScint(R) Scan, Cyt-356)

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been extremely helpful in the detection of new or recurrent prostate cancer. However, localization of the recurrent tumor has been challenging with currently available radiographic modalities. The (111)In-capromab pendetide scan was developed to diagnose accurately and, more importantly, localize and stage a new or recurrent prostate cancer. Studies suggest that the (111)In-capromab pendetide scan can provide more accurate staging of clinically localized prostate cancer prior to staging lymphadenectomy or definitive therapy. It can also provide valuable information when local adjuvant radiation therapy is considered in men with biochemical cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy.     

Immunotherapy of prostate cancer: identification of new treatments and targets for therapy, and role of WAP domain-containing proteins

Prostate adenocarcinoma is present in over 80% of men over the age of 80 and is by far the most common cancer of men. Although radical prostatectomy is curative in early disease, the risks of incontinence and impotence can affect the quality of life of patients. Early intervention with localized immunotherapy represents a potential solution as lymphocyte infiltration does occur in prostate cancer lesions, and immunotherapy with dendritic cell vaccines can significantly increase survival in late stage disease. However, lymphocytic infiltrates in the cancerous prostates have an anergic character arising from the suppressive effects of the microenvironment resulting from a conversion of effector cells into regulatory T-cells. Although TGFβ (transforming growth factor β) and IL-10 (interleukin-10) are known to be strong suppressor molecules associated with prostate cancer, they are among many possible suppressive factors. We discuss the possible role of alternative suppressor molecules, including the WAP (whey acidic protein) homologue ps20 that is expressed on prostate stroma and other WAP domain-containing proteins in the immunosuppressive prostate cancer milieu and discuss novel immunotherapeutic strategies to combat this disease.     

Changes in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era: an Italian experience

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in prostate cancer clinical and pathologic features by review of 15 years' experience with radical prostatectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 596 consecutive patients who underwent open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1991 and 2006 were included. All had clinically localized prostate cancer. Surgical specimens were analyzed or blindly reviewed by a uropathologist, and whole-mount sections were prepared. Statistical analysis evaluated whether significant changes in clinical and pathologic variables occurred over time. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen (PSA) values at diagnosis significantly decreased over time. Definite stage migration was observed, with significant increase of organ-confined tumors. Incidence of seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement declined steadily. Median tumor volume decreased significantly over time (p<0.001). Incidence of nonsignificant cancers at RP increased significantly, reaching 25.6% in 2006. PSA value has progressively lost correlation with prostate cancer volume and today correlates only with prostate gland volume. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer stage and volume at diagnosis have steadily decreased in the last 15 years, likely reflecting increasing use of PSA testing. In early prostate cancer, PSA level no longer correlates with tumor volume.     

Evaluation and treatment of men with biochemical prostate-specific antigen recurrence following definitive therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Early detection and monitoring by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement has increased the number of men presenting with potentially curable prostate cancer. Most will choose radical prostatectomy or some form of radiation therapy for treatment, but some will have evidence of biochemical disease recurrence following therapy, shown by a rising PSA level without other clinical evidence of disease. Radical prostatectomy involves the removal of all prostate tissue, causing the serum PSA to decline to undetectable levels within four to six weeks following surgery; a subsequent rise in the serum PSA to a detectable level indicates disease recurrence. Patients should be evaluated to assess whether rising PSA levels indicate local recurrence or early metastatic disease. The advantages of salvage radiation, endocrine therapy, and other treatment modalities in local disease recurrence must be weighed against potential side effects and the resulting decrease in quality of life. Radiation therapy does not immediately eradicate all PSA-producing cells; therefore the persistence of a detectable PSA does not necessarily imply residual cancer, but rising PSA levels indicate treatment failure. Salvage surgery can be performed after radiotherapy for the purpose of removing all viable cancer cells, but should be weighed against a higher incidence of surgical complications; cryoablation offers a less invasive therapeutic modality.     

E-1899: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study Comparing Ketoconazole Plus Hydrocortisone with Docetaxel Plus Estramustine for Asymptomatic, Androgen-Independent, Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Patients with Rising PSA Levels

Many prostate cancer patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy receive "early" hormonal therapy, despite its uncertain benefit. When these patients ultimately progress to androgen independence, their management remains controversial, with many receiving second-line hormonal therapy. Chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer has a defined palliative benefit; studies to establish its potential impact on survival are ongoing. E-1899 is an intergroup phase III trial comparing second-line hormonal therapy with ketoconazole plus hydrocortisone with docetaxel plus estramustine in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer with rising PSA levels who have no evidence of metastases.