L-苏氨酸工业生产发酵条件优化研究

发酵法生产L-苏氨酸是目前广泛采用的方法,因此研究工业生产发酵条件优化具有重要意义。试验以高产L-苏氨酸菌作为出发菌株,结合本公司的实际工业生产条件对发酵各条件进行了一系列优化研究,结果表明：添加0.2%的工业级生长促进剂,以复合糖代替葡萄糖为初糖,并控制初糖浓度在60g/L,除生长高峰期外,发酵过程中溶解氧（DO）控制在10%~20%之间;最终发酵放罐湿菌体在45g/L左右,L-苏氨酸含量可达110g/L左右。     

氮源对L-苏氨酸发酵的影响

以L-苏氨酸生产菌TRFC为供试菌株,研究了氮源对L-苏氨酸发酵的产量和糖酸转化率的影响。首先通过摇瓶实验确定发酵的最佳无机氮源和有机氮源分别为硫酸铵和酵母粉,进一步利用10L罐补料分批发酵确定硫酸铵和酵母粉的最佳用量,继续优化培养条件,采用发酵中后期流加硫酸铵和糖氨混合补料等措施,L-苏氨酸产量得到进一步的提高。在最优发酵条件下,通过10L罐补料分批发酵36h,产酸可达118.9g/L,糖酸转化率为47.6%。     

不同溶氧条件下L-苏氨酸生物合成菌株的代谢流量分析

[目的]探索L-苏氨酸生物合成机理及影响因素.[方法]建立了大肠杆菌L-苏氨酸的代谢流平衡模型,应用MATLAB软件计算出不同溶氧条件下发酵中后期代谢网络的代谢流分布及理想代谢流分布.[结果]5%溶氧条件下,25.5%碳架进入HMP途径,74.5%碳架进入糖酵解途径,获得33.9%质量转化率;20%溶氧条件下,58.08%碳架进入HMP途径,41.92%碳架进入糖酵解途径,获得46.5%质量转化率;[结论]与理想代谢流(88.23%质量转化率)相比,应从菌种改造和发酵控制方面通过改变6-磷酸葡萄糖异构酶借以增加HMP途径代谢流量,通过增加磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化反应代谢流提高天冬氨酸族合成代谢流,减少TCA循环代谢流量,从而达到减少副产物生成,增加L-苏氨酸生物合成的目的.     

利用Red同源重组技术构建产L-苏氨酸的基因工程菌

利用Red重组技术构建不同基因突变的L-苏氨酸工程菌大肠杆菌ITHR,研究单敲除metA、ilvA和双敲除metA、ilvA基因后对L-苏氨酸积累的影响。应用质粒pKD46介导的Red同源重组系统,通过第一次同源重组将拟敲除基因替换为氯霉素抗性基因,再通过重组酶在FRT位点发生第二次同源重组,消除抗性基因,成功敲除了菌株ITHR体内苏氨酸合成的代谢旁路途径中的metA和ilvA基因,构建了三株不同的基因突变株。将携带苏氨酸操纵子的工程质粒pWYE065电转化入敲除不同基因的突变株中,构建基因工程菌。经5 L发酵罐发酵产酸实验,未敲除任何基因的菌株ITHR/pWYE065 L-苏氨酸的产量为5.55±0.51 g/L,metA基因单敲除菌株ITHR△metA/pWYE065 L-苏氨酸产量为9.77±1.83 g/L,ilvA基因单敲除菌株ITHR△ilvA/pWYE065 L-苏氨酸产量为8.65±1.42 g/L,同时敲除ilvA和metA基因的菌株ITHR△metA△ilvA/pWYE065 L-苏氨酸的产量增加到13.6±1.14 g/L。通过敲除L-苏氨酸的旁路代谢途径中的关键酶的基因,可以增强L 苏氨酸积累的效果,为L-苏氨酸工程菌的进一步改造奠定了基础。     

产L-丝氨酸菌株SYPS-062的鉴定及碳源对发酵的影响

采用形态学、生理生化实验和16S rDNA序列分析的方法对从自然界中筛选得到的一株能直接利用糖质原料发酵生产L-丝氨酸菌株SYPS-062的分类地位进行了研究, 确定其为谷氨酸棒杆菌(Corynebacterium glutamicum)。同时考察了碳源对菌株SYPS-062发酵产L-丝氨酸的影响, 实验结果表明, 当蔗糖浓度为60 g/L时, 菌株SYPS-062生物量和L-丝氨酸的积累均达到最大值, 分别为8.1 g/L和6.6 g/L。     

含苏氨酸操纵子重组质粒的构建及其对大肠杆菌L-苏氨酸积累的影响

摘要：【目的】通过分子生物学手段构建重组质粒,将其转入野生型大肠杆菌W3110,分析含苏氨酸操纵子基因的质粒及质粒定点突变解除反馈抑制时,对L-苏氨酸积累的影响。【方法】以W3110染色体DNA为模板,PCR扩增苏氨酸操纵子基因,即启动子THrLp、编码前导肽基因thrL以及thrA、thrB、thrC基因,通过重叠延伸PCR的方法对thrA基因定点突变,解除苏氨酸对它的反馈抑制,构建出重组表达质粒WYE112和WYE134,5 L发酵实验测定L-苏氨酸的产量。【结果】经5 L发酵罐发酵产酸实验,W3110的L-苏氨酸产量为0.036 ± 0.004 g/L,携带含苏氨酸操纵子质粒的W3110菌株L-苏氨酸产量为2.590 ± 0.115 g/L,质粒上thrA解除反馈抑制后,L-苏氨酸的产量增加到9.223 ± 1.279 g/L。【结论】过表达苏氨酸操纵子基因可以使L-苏氨酸积累,进一步解除thrA基因的反馈抑制,可以增强L-苏氨酸积累的效果,为L-苏氨酸工程菌改造的进一步研究奠定了基础。     

L-异亮氨酸发酵代谢分析

通过在5L自控发酵罐上对L-异亮氨酸的发酵过程进行研究,分析了发酵基本特征,并结合菌体形态及发酵控制参数的变化,指出发酵过程中代谢流流向及代谢平衡和可能存在的代谢流迁移,为进一步发酵条件优化和分阶段控制发酵研究奠定基础。     

溶氧对L-苏氨酸发酵的影响

探索溶氧对L-苏氨酸发酵过程的影响及其控制方法。通过摇瓶装液量试验、不同溶氧控制方式考察发酵过程中溶氧对L-苏氨酸合成的影响。采用补料分批发酵工艺发酵L-苏氨酸,利用氨基酸分析仪测定发酵液中L-苏氨酸的产量,通过10L罐补料分批发酵36h,产酸可达118.9g/L,糖酸转化率为47.6%。可以得出溶氧对L-苏氨酸生物合成有重要影响,并建立了最佳溶氧控制条件。     

玫瑰黄链霉菌NKZ-259发酵培养基的优化

玫瑰黄链霉菌NKZ-259是一株生防菌株,其次级代谢能产生植物生长调节类物质吲哚乙酸(IAA)。为了进一步提高菌株代谢产生IAA的含量,本试验对该菌株的发酵培养基进行了优化。利用单因子试验确定发酵培养基中最适的6种营养成分为葡萄糖、可溶性淀粉、蛋白胨、硝酸钾、磷酸氢二钾和L-色氨酸;通过Plackett-Burman设计筛选出影响菌株发酵产生IAA的主要因素为L-色氨酸、葡萄糖和磷酸氢二钾;采用中心组合试验(CCD)及响应面法分析各因素的交互作用。最终确定菌株代谢产生IAA的最优发酵培养基为:L-色氨酸2.24 g/L,葡萄糖20.7 g/L,磷酸氢二钾0.5 g/L,可溶性淀粉10 g/L,蛋白胨3 g/L,硝酸钾4.5g/L;使用优化后的发酵培养基菌株代谢产生IAA的含量为45.377 4μg/mL,比原始发酵培养基IAA的含量提高了3倍。     

柠檬酸钠对L-组氨酸发酵代谢流分布的影响

目的：建立谷氨酸棒杆菌TL1105生物合成L-组氨酸的代谢网络模型,并进行代谢网络计量分析。方法：通过所构建的L-组氨酸代谢网络模型,利用MATLAB软件计算出添加柠檬酸钠和不添加柠檬酸钠发酵中后期代谢网络的代谢流分布。结果：在L-组氨酸分批发酵过程中,在发酵初期未添加柠檬酸钠的条件下流向戊糖磷酸途径（HMP）的代谢流为9.59,合成组氨酸的代谢流为8.91;在发酵初期添加2g/L柠檬酸钠的条件下流向HMP的代谢流为12.74,合成组氨酸的代谢流为9.61。结论：在发酵初期添加柠檬酸钠能够改变L-组氨酸生物合成途径的关键节点6-磷酸葡萄糖、丙酮酸及乙酰辅酶A的代谢流分布,保持糖酵解途径、三羧酸循环与HMP之间代谢流量平衡,有利于提高L-组氨酸生物合成途径的代谢流量,最终使流向组氨酸的代谢流增加了7.86%。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor