鼠巨细胞病毒 IE-1核酸疫苗和灭活疫苗联合免疫抗病毒感染的研究

巨细胞病毒（Cytomegalovirus,CMV）在人群中感染普遍,对婴幼儿及免疫低下人群中造成严重疾病,目前还没有针对该病毒的商品化疫苗。本研究以BALB/c小鼠为动物模型,探讨鼠巨细胞病毒（Murine cytomega-lovirus,MCMV）IE-1 DNA疫苗和MCMV灭活疫苗联合免疫抗MCMV感染的免疫保护效果。将编码IE-1基因的DNA疫苗（pIE-1）通过肌肉注射辅以电穿孔的方式对小鼠进行初免,再用全病毒灭活疫苗单独或者辅以MF59佐剂进行加强免疫,分别通过ELISA和ELISPOT方法检测到联合免疫策略在免疫组小鼠体内诱导了MC-MV特异性的抗体应答和CTL应答;免疫两周后用3＆#215;LD50致死剂量MCMV感染小鼠,疫苗对小鼠的免疫保护通过检测小鼠存活率、重要器官中的病毒滴度及体重丢失率来评价。结果显示,与单独免疫DNA疫苗或灭活疫苗相比,IE-1 DNA疫苗联合灭活疫苗组能同时在小鼠体内诱导体液免疫和细胞免疫应答,并提供小鼠完全保护;而且MF59辅以灭活疫苗免疫小鼠能增强疫苗的免疫效果。     

IL-12对巨细胞病毒DNA疫苗免疫增强作用的研究

白介素12(interleukin 12,IL-12)主要和细胞免疫应答有关,是免疫过程中重要的调节因子。本研究探讨IL-12对编码巨细胞病毒(cytomegalovirus,CMV)即刻早期基因IE1的DNA疫苗的免疫增强作用。将CMVIE1质粒DNA单独或与编码IL-12的质粒DNA共同免疫小鼠,然后用致死量病毒攻击小鼠。通过检测小鼠体内诱导的细胞免疫应答、小鼠的存活率、体重丢失率、器官中的病毒滴度等来评价IL-12对疫苗免疫的佐剂效果。结果显示,与单独疫苗免疫组相比,IE1 DNA联合IL-12 DNA免疫组能够在小鼠体内诱导更高的细胞免疫应答水平,同时能够降低器官中的病毒滴度,显著提高保护率,从而更好地抵抗病毒攻击。实验证明,IL-12能够作为巨细胞病毒IE1 DNA疫苗的佐剂,提高免疫保护效果。     

流感病毒NP表位序列增强H7N9 HA DNA疫苗免疫效果研究

为增强H7N9流感病毒HA DNA疫苗的免疫效果,本文构建了含有流感病毒NP的5个重复优势T表位或B表位(包括B_1线性表位和B_2构象表位)的表达质粒(简称NPT和NPB),以小鼠为动物模型,将NPT和NPB分别与H7N9流感病毒HA DNA混合免疫BALB/c小鼠1次,21 d后用致死剂量(20 LD_(50))的H7N9流感病毒攻击小鼠。通过检测免疫后小鼠血清特异性抗体滴度和攻毒后的免疫保护性指标-存活率、肺部残余病毒滴度及体重丢失率,评价表位质粒与HA DNA疫苗混合免疫对小鼠的保护效果。试验结果表明:用致死性H7N9流感病毒攻击小鼠后,HA DNA组小鼠全部死亡,HA+NPT免疫组小鼠存活率达到100%,HA+NPB1和HA+NPB2免疫组,小鼠存活率分别为30%和75%;混合免疫HA+NPT后小鼠抗体滴度升高明显,攻毒后小鼠体重丢失明显降低。综上表明,含有5个NP优势T表位或B表位的表达质粒能增强H7N9流感病毒HA DNA疫苗的免疫效果,混合免疫一次可以使小鼠得到较好的保护。HA DNA和表位疫苗的混合免疫,节约了疫苗用量,降低了免疫成本,为流感病毒核酸疫苗的临床开发提供了一定的试验基础。     

编码流感病毒血凝素基因和CD40L的核酸疫苗抗小鼠流感研究

为了检测表达CD40L的质粒能否作为核酸疫苗佐剂提高A/PR8/34流感病毒血凝素(HA)DNA疫苗的免疫应答,构建了表达鼠CD40L的质粒,并将它与A型流感病毒的 HA DNA疫苗用电击的方法共同免疫BALB/C小鼠(各30μg),免疫两次,间隔三周,第二次免疫后1周,用致死量流感病毒A/PR8/34攻击.发现与单独免疫30μg HA相比,血清中抗HA的IgG抗体量明显提高,且以IgG2a抗体提高为主,小鼠体重减轻非常少且体重恢复加快.实验结果显示,CD40L能作为流感病毒核酸疫苗佐剂,提高小鼠抗流感病毒攻击的能力.     

编码流感病毒血凝素基因和CD40L的核酸疫苗抗小鼠流感研究

为了检测表达CD40L的质粒能台作为核酸疫苗佐剂提高A／PR8／34流感病毒血凝素(HA)DNA疫苗的免疫应答,构建了表达鼠CD40L的质粒,行将它与A型流感病毒的HADNA疫苗用电击的方法共同免疫BALB／C小鼠(各30μg),免疫两次,间隔三周,第二次免疫后1周,用致死量流感病毒A／PR8／34攻击。发现与单独免疫30μgHA相比,血清中抗HA的IgG抗体节明显提高,且以IgG2a抗体提高为主,小鼠体重减轻非常少且体重恢复加快。实验结果显示,CD40L能作为流感病毒核酸疫苗佐剂,提高小鼠抗流感病毒攻击的能力。     

IL-15基因佐剂对HIV-1B亚型gp160DNA及腺病毒载体疫苗的免疫效果的影响

本研究构建了IL15质粒以评估其对表达HIV-1gp160的DNA和腺病毒5型载体疫苗的免疫效果的影响。我们构建表达IL15的质粒pVR-IL15,将pVR-IL15联合pVR-HIVgp160初免Ad5-HIVgp160加强方式免疫BALB/c小鼠,用IFN-γELISPOT和ELISA等方法比较疫苗单独免疫组小鼠与疫苗加IL15佐剂组小鼠诱导的细胞免疫和体液免疫反应的强度。结果显示疫苗加IL15佐剂组小鼠诱导的细胞免疫反应和体液免疫反应比疫苗单独免疫组小鼠相均有显著增强。构建的IL15基因佐剂可以增强HIV DNA疫苗初免和腺病毒疫苗加强免疫策略的免疫效果。     

GM-CSF和IL-4增强Aβ表位DNA疫苗的免疫原性研究

目的:探究和评价粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)及白细胞介素4(IL-4)作为β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)表位DNA疫苗的分子佐剂,增强DNA疫苗体液和细胞免疫反应的水平。方法:阿尔茨海默病DNA表位疫苗p VAX1-6Aβ15-T分别与重组DNA分子佐剂p VAX1-S-IL-4和p VAX1-S-GM-CSF联合免疫BALB/c小鼠,并检测其免疫原性。结果:分子佐剂IL-4组相比单独的DNA表位疫苗p VAX1-6Aβ15-T组抗体水平具有一定程度的提高;GM-CSF能明显提高DNA疫苗Aβ特异的抗体水平和泛DR辅助T细胞表位(PADRE)特异的细胞免疫反应,4次免疫后其抗体滴度提高了4倍。结论:GM-CSF佐剂能够有效地用于今后阿尔茨海默病DNA表位疫苗的研究中。     

嵌合NY-ESO-1 DNA疫苗诱导黑色素瘤小鼠模型抗肿瘤免疫的研究

NY-ESO-1作为一种肿瘤抗原,具有较强的免疫抗原性,并且已成为肿瘤候选疫苗之一。但由于目前大多应用NY-ESO-1多肽以及蛋白质疫苗,其临床试验效果欠佳,亟需更为有效的NY-ESO-1抗原设计的肿瘤免疫治疗出现。该研究的目的是探索将NY-ESO-1与具有增强免疫效应的五种因子分别重组成嵌合蛋白抗原,使其更有效地被加工、转运和呈递,以期找到最佳的基因佐剂,增强NY-ESO-1作为肿瘤治疗性DNA疫苗的免疫效果。采用电脉冲体内细胞高效转入的方法对C57BL/6小鼠进行DNA免疫,发现用编码NY-ESO-1或连接有HSP70的嵌合体质粒免疫可诱导强烈的NY-ESO-1特异性Ig G1反应。NY-ESO-1连接泛素的质粒免疫小鼠主要诱导NY-ESO-1特异性Ig G2a反应,表明此基因佐剂诱导强的Th1免疫反应。与其他嵌合NY-ESO-1质粒免疫相比,NYESO-1连接泛素的质粒免疫小鼠,有效地保护小鼠对有NY-ESO-1表达的B16F10黑色素瘤细胞系的挑战作用,证明强的Th1免疫反应对预防和治疗肿瘤具有重要作用。去除调节性T细胞(regulatory T cells,Treg)可进一步增强泛素-NY-ESO-1嵌合DNA疫苗治疗黑色素瘤的作用。此外,Ub-NY-ESO-1质粒结合编码异源黑素瘤抗原GP100和TRP-2的质粒免疫可诱导对抗含有NY-ESO-1表达的B16F10黑色素瘤的协同抗肿瘤免疫疗效。该研究结果表明,编码泛素-NY-ESO-1嵌合抗原的质粒DNA疫苗或与编码其他相关黑色素瘤抗原的质粒的联合可能是有效的治疗黑色素瘤的疫苗。     

超抗原SEA增强小鼠对HBV DNA 疫苗的免疫反应

观察超抗原SEA(D227A)的真核表达载体（pmSEA）, 对HBV DNA 疫苗诱导Balb/c 小鼠(H2d）免疫应答的调节作用。 肌内注射空载体pcDNA3、HBV DNA 疫苗加pmSEA佐剂（pHBVS2S+pmSEA）或不加佐剂（pHBVS2S）; ELISA 法测定血清抗HBs; ELISPOT检测分泌IFN-γ的脾淋巴细胞;4 h51Cr 释放法检测小鼠脾细胞CTL 活性。HBV DNA佐剂组免疫小鼠抗HBsAg抗体滴度明显高于不加佐剂组,其IgG1/IgG2a的比例不同于多肽免疫组,二者分别为0.282与10。HBV DNA佐剂组均能增强IgG1和IgG2a的产生,是不加佐剂组的1.36、1.73倍。佐剂组小鼠脾淋巴细胞IFN-γ的分泌量是不加佐剂组2～3倍。CTL 细胞杀伤活性（E:T=100）佐剂组与不加佐剂组分别为：69.77%±7.5%、 42.81%±7.7%,差异显著(P<0.05)。HBV DNA 疫苗具有较强的免疫原性, 能够诱导机体产生特异性的抗体及CTL反应;pmSEA佐剂能够提高小鼠对DNA 疫苗的免疫应答,有望成为DNA 疫苗的免疫佐剂。     

GM-CSF在登革热病毒和丙型肝炎病毒DNA疫苗诱导的免疫应答中的作用

研究GM-CSF在DV、HCV等几种黄病毒DNA疫苗诱导的免疫应答中的作用,并分析其作为黄病毒DNA疫苗佐剂的可能性。构建各种真核表达质粒,抽提质粒DNA,分组免疫小鼠,通过ELISA及间接免疫荧光染色检测小鼠血清抗体的动态水平。DV1及DV2prM/E核酸疫苗与GM-CSF质粒共接种的佐剂组小鼠血清抗体水平低于无佐剂的疫苗组,即GM-CSF显示了一定的免疫抑制作用,其中以DV1prM/E核酸疫苗更为显著;而在HCVC及E1蛋白核酸疫苗中,GM-CSF则具有一定免疫增强作用。GM-CSF作为疫苗佐剂,其作用具有复杂的多样性,因抗原的不同可能会呈现免疫提升或免疫抑制,因此选择其作为核酸疫苗佐剂时需慎重。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor