Mutation of interfaces in domain-swapped human betaB2-crystallin

The superfamily of eye lens betagamma-crystallins is highly modularized, with Greek key motifs being used to form symmetric domains. Sequences of monomeric gamma-crystallins and oligomeric beta-crystallins fold into two domains that pair about a further conserved symmetric interface. Conservation of this assembly interface by domain swapping is the device adopted by family member betaB2-crystallin to form a solution dimer. However, the betaB1-crystallin solution dimer is formed from an interface used by the domain-swapped dimer to form a tetramer in the crystal lattice. Comparison of these two structures indicated an intriguing relationship between linker conformation, interface ion pair networks, and higher assembly. Here the X-ray structure of recombinant human betaB2-crystallin showed that domain swapping was determined by the sequence and not assembly conditions. The solution characteristics of mutants that were designed to alter an ion pair network at a higher assembly interface and a mutant that changed a proline showed they remained dimeric. X-ray crystallography showed that the dimeric mutants did not reverse domain swapping. Thus, the sequence of betaB2-crystallin appears well optimized for domain swapping. However, a charge-reversal mutation to the conserved domain-pairing interface showed drastic changes to solution behavior. It appears that the higher assembly of the betagamma-crystallin domains has exploited symmetry to create diversity while avoiding aggregation. These are desirable attributes for proteins that have to exist at very high concentration for a very long time.     

Molecular mechanism of domain swapping in proteins: an analysis of slower motions

Domain swapping is a structural phenomenon that plays an important role in the mechanism of oligomerization of some proteins. The monomer units in the oligomeric structure become entangled with each other. Here we investigate the mechanism of domain swapping in diphtheria toxin and the structural criteria required for it to occur by analyzing the slower modes of motion with elastic network models, Gaussian network model and anisotropic network model. We take diphtheria toxin as a representative of this class of domain-swapped proteins and show that the domain, which is being swapped in the dimeric state, rotates and twists, in going from the "open" to the "closed" state, about a hinge axis that passes through the middle of the loop extending between two domains. A combination of the intra- and intermolecular contacts of the dimer is almost equivalent to that of the monomer, which shows that the relative orientations of the residues in both forms are almost identical. This is also reflected in the calculated B-factors when compared with the experimentally determined B-factors in x-ray crystal structures. The slowest modes of both the monomer and dimer show a common hinge centered on residue 387. The differences in distances between the monomer and the dimer also shows the hinge at nearly the same location (residue 381). Finally, the first three dominant modes of anisotropic network model together shows a twisting motion about the hinge centered on residue 387. We further identify the location of hinges for a set of another 12 domain swapped proteins and give the quantitative measures of the motions of the swapped domains toward their "closed" state, i.e., the overlap and correlation between vectors.     

A single disulfide bond differentiates aggregation pathways of beta2-microglobulin

Deposition of wild-type beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) into amyloid fibrils is a complication in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. The native beta-sandwich fold of beta2m has a highly conserved disulfide bond linking Cys25 and Cys80. Oxidized beta2m forms needle-like amyloid fibrils at pH 2.5 in vitro, whereas reduced beta2m, at acid pH, in which the intra-chain disulfide bond is disrupted, cannot form typical fibrils. Instead, reduced beta2m forms thinner and more flexible filaments. To uncover the difference in molecular mechanisms underlying the aggregation of the oxidized and reduced beta2m, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of beta2m oligomerization under oxidized and reduced conditions. We show that, consistent with experimental observations, the oxidized beta2m forms domain-swapped dimer, in which the two proteins exchange their N-terminal segments complementing each other. In contrast, both dimers and trimers, formed by reduced beta2m, are comprised of parallel beta-sheets between monomers and stabilized by the hydrogen bond network along the backbone. The oligomerized monomers are in extended conformations, capable of further aggregation. We find that both reduced and oxidized dimers are thermodynamically less stable than their corresponding monomers, indicating that beta2m oligomerization is not accompanied by the formation of a thermodynamically stable dimer. Our studies suggest that the different aggregation pathways of oxidized and reduced beta2m are dictated by the formation of distinct precursor oligomeric species that are modulated by Cys25-Cys80 disulfide-bonds. We propose that the propagation of domain swapping is the aggregation mechanism for the oxidized beta2m, while "parallel stacking" of partially unfolded beta2m is the aggregation mechanism for the reduced beta2m.     

3D domain swapping: a mechanism for oligomer assembly.

3D domain swapping is a mechanism for forming oligomeric proteins from their monomers. In 3D domain swapping, one domain of a monomeric protein is replaced by the same domain from an identical protein chain. The result is an intertwined dimer or higher oligomer, with one domain of each subunit replaced by the identical domain from another subunit. The swapped "domain" can be as large as an entire tertiary globular domain, or as small as an alpha-helix or a strand of a beta-sheet. Examples of 3D domain swapping are reviewed that suggest domain swapping can serve as a mechanism for functional interconversion between monomers and oligomers, and that domain swapping may serve as a mechanism for evolution of some oligomeric proteins. Domain-swapped proteins present examples of a single protein chain folding into two distinct structures.     

Solution NMR study of the monomeric form of p13suc1 protein sheds light on the hinge region determining the affinity for a phosphorylated substrate.

Cyclin-dependent kinase subunit (CKS) proteins bind to cyclin-dependent kinases and target various proteins to phosphorylation and proteolysis during cell division. Crystal structures showed that CKS can exist both in a closed monomeric conformation when bound to the kinase and in an inactive C-terminal beta-strand-exchanged conformation. With the exception of the hinge loop, however, both crystal structures are identical, and no new protein interface is formed in the dimer. Protein engineering studies have pinpointed the crucial role of the proline 90 residue of the p13(suc1) CKS protein from Schizosaccharomyces pombe in the monomer-dimer equilibrium and have led to the concept of a loaded molecular spring of the beta-hinge motif. Mutation of this hinge proline into an alanine stabilizes the protein and prevents the occurrence of swapping. However, other mutations further away from the hinge as well as ligand binding can equally shift the equilibrium between monomer and dimer. To address the question of differential affinity through relief of the strain, here we compare the ligand binding of the monomeric form of wild-type S. pombe p13(suc1) and its hinge mutant P90A in solution by NMR spectroscopy. We indeed observed a 5-fold difference in affinity with the wild-type protein being the most strongly binding. Our structural study further indicates that both wild-type and the P90A mutant proteins adopt in solution the closed conformation but display different dynamic properties in the C-terminal beta-sheet involved in domain swapping and protein interactions.     

Domain swapping in N-truncated human cystatin C

Human cystatin C (HCC) inhibits papain-like cysteine proteases by a binding epitope composed of two beta-hairpin loops and the N-terminal segment. HCC is found in all body fluids and is present at a particularly high level in the cerebrospinal fluid. Oligomerization of HCC leads to amyloid deposits in brain arteries at advanced age but this pathological process is greatly accelerated with a naturally occurring Leu68Gln variant, resulting in fatal amyloidosis in early adult life. When proteins are extracted from human cystatin C amyloid deposits, an N-terminally truncated cystatin C (THCC) is found, lacking the first ten amino acid residues of the native sequence. It has been shown that the cerebrospinal fluid may cause this N-terminal truncation, possibly because of disintegration of the leucocytes normally present in this fluid, and the release of leucocyte proteolytic enzymes. HCC is the first disease-causing amyloidogenic protein for which oligomerization via 3D domain swapping has been observed. The aggregates arise in the crystallization buffer and have the form of 2-fold symmetric dimers in which a long alpha-helix of one molecule, flanked by two adjacent beta-strands, has replaced an identical domain of the other molecule, and vice versa. Consistent with a conformational change at one of the beta-hairpin loops of the binding epitope, the dimers (and also any other oligomers, including amyloid aggregates) are inactive as papain inhibitors. Here, we report the structure of N-truncated HCC, the dominant form of cystatin C in amyloid deposits. Although the protein crystallized under conditions that are drastically different from those for the full-length protein, the structure reveals dimerization by the same act of domain swapping. However, the new crystal structure is composed of four independent HCC dimers, none of which has the exact 2-fold symmetry of the full-length dimer. While the four dimers have the same overall topology, the exact relation between the individual domains shows a variability that reflects the flexibility at the dimer-specific open interface, which in the case of 3D domain-swapped HCC consists of beta-interactions between the open hinge loops and results in an unusually long intermolecular beta-sheet. The dimers are engaged in further quaternary interactions resulting in spherical, closed octameric assemblies that are identical to that present in the crystal of the full-length protein. The octamers interact via hydrophobic patches formed on the surface of the domain-swapped dimers as well as by extending the dimer beta-sheet through intermolecular contacts.     

A domain-swapped RNase A dimer with implications for amyloid formation

Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease (RNase A) forms two types of dimers (a major and a minor component) upon concentration in mild acid. These two dimers exhibit different biophysical and biochemical properties. Earlier we reported that the minor dimer forms by swapping its N-terminal alpha-helix with that of an identical molecule. Here we find that the major dimer forms by swapping its C-terminal beta-strand, thus revealing the first example of three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping taking place in different parts of the same protein. This feature permits RNase A to form tightly bonded higher oligomers. The hinge loop of the major dimer, connecting the swapped beta-strand to the protein core, resembles a short segment of the polar zipper proposed by Perutz and suggests a model for aggregate formation by 3D domain swapping with a polar zipper.     

Single-site mutations induce 3D domain swapping in the B1 domain of protein L from Peptostreptococcus magnus.

BACKGROUND: Thermodynamic and kinetic studies of the Protein L B1 domain (Ppl) suggest a folding pathway in which, during the folding transition, the first beta hairpin is formed while the second beta hairpin and the alpha helix are largely unstructured. The same mutations in the two beta turns have opposite effects on the folding and unfolding rates. Three of the four residues composing the second beta turn in Ppl have consecutive positive phi angles, indicating strain in the second beta turn. RESULTS: We have determined the crystal structures of the beta turn mutants G55A, K54G, and G15A, as well as a core mutant, V49A, in order to investigate how backbone strain affects the overall structure of Ppl. Perturbation of the hydrophobic interactions at the closed interface by the V49A mutation triggered the domain swapping of the C-terminal beta strand that relieved the strain in the second beta turn. Interestingly, the asymmetric unit of V49A contains two monomers and one domain-swapped dimer. The G55A mutation escalated the strain in the second beta turn, and this increased strain shifted the equilibrium toward the domain-swapped dimer. The K54G structure revealed that the increased stability is due to the reduction of strain in the second beta turn, while the G15A structure showed that increased strain alone is insufficient to trigger domain swapping. CONCLUSIONS: Domain swapping in Ppl is determined by the balance of two opposing components of the free energy. One is the strain in the second beta turn that favors the dimer, and the other is the entropic cost of dimer formation that favors the monomer. A single-site mutation can disrupt this balance and trigger domain swapping.     

A proposed structural model for amyloid fibril elongation: domain swapping forms an interdigitating beta-structure polymer

We propose a model illustrating how proteins, which differ in their overall sequences and structures, can form the propagating, twisted beta-sheet conformations, characteristic of amyloids. Some cases of amyloid formation can be explained through a "domain swapping" event, where the swapped segment is either a beta-hairpin or an unstable conformation which can partially unfold and assume a beta-hairpin structure. As in domain swapping, here the swapped beta-hairpin is at the edge of the structure, has few (if any) salt bridges and hydrogen bonds connecting it to the remainder of the structure and variable extents of buried non-polar surface areas. Additionally, in both cases the swapped piece constitutes a transient "building block" of the structure, with a high population time. Whereas in domain swapping the swapped fragment has been shown to be an alpha-helix, loop, strand or an entire domain, but so far not a beta-hairpin, despite the large number of cases in which it was already detected, here swapping may involve such a structural motif. We show how the swapping of beta-hairpins would form an interdigitated, twisted beta-sheet conformation, explaining the remarkable high stability of the protofibril in vitro. Such a swapping mechanism is attractive as it involves a universal mechanism in proteins, critical for their function, namely hinge-bending motions. Our proposal is consistent with structural superpositioning of mutational variants. While the overall r.m.s.d.s of the wild-type and mutants are small, the proposed hinge-bending region consistently shows larger deviations. These larger deviations illustrate that this region is more prone to respond to the mutational changes, regardless of their location in the sequence or in the structure. Nevertheless, above all, we stress that this proposition is hypothetical, since it is based on assumptions lacking definitive experimental support.     

Propensity for C-terminal domain swapping correlates with increased regional flexibility in the C-terminus of RNase A

Domain swapping is a type of oligomerization in which monomeric proteins exchange a structural element, resulting in oligomers whose subunits recapitulate the native, monomeric fold. It has been implicated as a potential mechanism for protein aggregation, which provides a strong impetus to understand the structural determinants and folding mechanisms that trigger domain swapping. Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (RNase A) is a well-studied protein known to domain swap under extreme conditions, such as lyophilization from acetic acid. The major domain-swapped dimer form of RNase A exchanges a β-strand at its C-terminus to form a C-terminal domain-swapped dimer. To study the mechanism by which C-terminal swapping occurs, we used a variant of RNase A containing a P114G mutation that readily domain swaps under physiological conditions. Using NMR and hydrogen-deuterium exchange, we find that the P114G variant has decreased protection from hydrogen exchange compared to the wild-type protein near the C-terminal hinge region. Our results suggest that domain swapping occurs via a local high-energy fluctuation at the C-terminus.     

Molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the domain swapping mechanism of human cystatin C

Human cystatin C (HCC), one of the amyloidgenic proteins, has been proved to form a dimeric structure via a domain swapping process and then cause amyloid deposits in the brains of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. HCC monomer consists of a core with a five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet (beta region) wrapped around a central helix. The connectivity of these secondary structures is: (N)-beta1-alpha-beta2-L1-beta3-AS-beta4-L2-beta5-(C). In this study, various molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to investigate the conformational changes of the monomeric HCC at different temperatures (300 and 500 K) and pH levels (2, 4, and 7) to gain insight into the domain swapping mechanism. The results show that high temperature (500 K) and low pH (pH 2) will trigger the domain swapping process of HCC. We further proposed that the domain swapping mechanism of HCC follows four steps: (1) the alpha-helix moves away from the beta region; (2) the contacts between beta2 and beta3-AS disappear; (3) the beta2-L1-beta3 hairpin unfolds following the so-called "zip-up" mechanism; and finally (4) the HCC dimer is formed. Our study shows that high temperature can accelerate the unfolding of HCC and the departure of the alpha-helix from the beta-region, especially at low pH value. This is attributed to the fact that that low pH results in the protonation of the side chains of Asp, Glu, and His residues, which further disrupts the following four salt-bridge interactions stabilizing the alpha-beta interface of the native structure: Asp15-Arg53 (beta1-beta2), Glu21/20-Lys54 (helix-beta2), Asp40-Arg70 (helix-AS), and His43-Asp81 (beta2-AS).     

3D domain-swapped human cystatin C with amyloidlike intermolecular beta-sheets

Oligomerization of human cystatin C (HCC) leads to amyloid deposits in brain arteries, and this process is greatly accelerated with a naturally occurring L68Q variant. The crystal structures of N-truncated and full-length HCC (cubic form) showed dimer formation via three-dimensional (3D) domain swapping, and this observation has led to the suggestion that an analogous domain-swapping mechanism, but propagated in an open-ended fashion, could be the basis of HCC fibril formation. Here we report that full-length HCC, when crystallized in a new, tetragonal form, dimerizes by swapping the same secondary structure elements but with a very different overall structure generated by the flexibility of the hinge linking the moveable elements. The beta-strands of the beta-cores of the two folding units of the present dimer are roughly parallel, while they formed an angle of about 100 degrees in the previous two structures. The dimers pack around a crystallographic dyad by extending their molecular beta-sheets in an intermolecular context. At the other edge of the molecular beta-sheet, side-chain-side-chain hydrogen bonds propagate the beta-structure in the same direction. In consequence, a supramolecular crystal structure is generated, with all the beta-strands of the domain-swapped dimers being perpendicular to one crystallographic direction. This observation is relevant to amyloid aggregation of HCC, as X-ray diffraction studies of amyloid fibrils show them to have ordered, repeating structure, consistent with the so-called cross-beta structure, in which extended polypeptide chains are perpendicular to the fiber axis and form infinite beta-sheets that are parallel to this axis.     

Influence of denatured and intermediate states of folding on protein aggregation

We simulate the aggregation thermodynamics and kinetics of proteins L and G, each of which self-assembles to the same alpha/beta [corrected] topology through distinct folding mechanisms. We find that the aggregation kinetics of both proteins at an experimentally relevant concentration exhibit both fast and slow aggregation pathways, although a greater proportion of protein G aggregation events are slow relative to those of found for protein L. These kinetic differences are correlated with the amount and distribution of intrachain contacts formed in the denatured state ensemble (DSE), or an intermediate state ensemble (ISE) if it exists, as well as the folding timescales of the two proteins. Protein G aggregates more slowly than protein L due to its rapidly formed folding intermediate, which exhibits native intrachain contacts spread across the protein, suggesting that certain early folding intermediates may be selected for by evolution due to their protective role against unwanted aggregation. Protein L shows only localized native structure in the DSE with timescales of folding that are commensurate with the aggregation timescale, leaving it vulnerable to domain swapping or nonnative interactions with other chains that increase the aggregation rate. Folding experiments that characterize the structural signatures of the DSE, ISE, or the transition state ensemble (TSE) under nonaggregating conditions should be able to predict regions where interchain contacts will be made in the aggregate, and to predict slower aggregation rates for proteins with contacts that are dispersed across the fold. Since proteins L and G can both form amyloid fibrils, this work also provides mechanistic and structural insight into the formation of prefibrillar species.     

3D domain swapping, protein oligomerization, and amyloid formation

In 3D domain swapping, first described by Eisenberg, a structural element of a monomeric protein is replaced by the same element from another subunit. This process requires partial unfolding of the closed monomers that is then followed by adhesion and reconstruction of the original fold but from elements contributed by different subunits. If the interactions are reciprocal, a closed-ended dimer will be formed, but the same phenomenon has been suggested as a mechanism for the formation of open-ended polymers as well, such as those believed to exist in amyloid fibrils. There has been a rapid progress in the study of 3D domain swapping. Oligomers higher than dimers have been found, the monomer-dimer equilibrium could be controlled by mutations in the hinge element of the chain, a single protein has been shown to form more than one domain-swapped structure, and recently, the possibility of simultaneous exchange of two structural domains by a single molecule has been demonstrated. This last discovery has an important bearing on the possibility that 3D domain swapping might be indeed an amyloidogenic mechanism. Along the same lines is the discovery that a protein of proven amyloidogenic properties, human cystatin C, is capable of 3D domain swapping that leads to oligomerization. The structure of domain-swapped human cystatin C dimers explains why a naturally occurring mutant of this protein has a much higher propensity for aggregation, and also suggests how this same mechanism of 3D domain swapping could lead to an open-ended polymer that would be consistent with the cross-beta structure, which is believed to be at the heart of the molecular architecture of amyloid fibrils.     

Dimerization of Crh by reversible 3D domain swapping induces structural adjustments to its monomeric homologue Hpr

The crystal structure of the regulatory protein Crh from Bacillus subtilis was solved at 1.8A resolution and showed an intertwined dimer formed by N-terminal beta1-strand swapping of two monomers. Comparison with the monomeric NMR structure of Crh revealed a domain swap induced conformational rearrangement of the putative interaction site with the repressor CcpA. The resulting conformation closely resembles that observed for the monomeric Crh homologue HPr, indicating that the Crh dimer is the active form binding to CcpA. An analogous dimer of HPr can be constructed without domain swapping, suggesting that HPr may dimerize upon binding to CcpA. Our data suggest that reversible 3D domain swapping of Crh might be an efficient regulatory mechanism to modulate its activity.     

An enhanced elastic network model to represent the motions of domain-swapped proteins

Domain swapping is a process where two (or more) protein molecules form a dimer (or higher oligomer) by exchanging an identical domain. In this article, based on the observation that domains are rigid and hinge loops are highly flexible, we propose a new Elastic Network Model, domain-ENM, for domain-swapped proteins. In this model, the rigidity of domains is taken into account by using a larger spring constant for intradomain contacts. The large-scale transition of domain swapping is then novelly decomposed into the relative motion between the rigid domains (only 6 degrees of freedom) plus the internal fluctuations of each domain. Consequently, this approach has the potential to produce much more meaningful transition pathways than other simulation approaches that try to find pathways in a search space of large numbers of dimensions. In this article, we also propose a new way to define the overlap measure. Past approaches used an inappropriate comparison of the large-scale conformation displacement against the computed infinitesimal motions of modes. Here, we propose an infinitesimal version of the large-scale conformation change and then compare it with the modes of motions. As a result, we obtain much better overlap values. Using this new overlap definition, we are also able for the first time to give a clear, intuitive explanation why "open" forms tend to produce better overlap values than "closed" forms with traditional ENMs. Finally, as an application, we present a simple approach to show how domain-ENM can be used to generated transition pathways for domain-swapped proteins.     

Crystal structure of the human prion protein reveals a mechanism for oligomerization

The pathogenesis of transmissible encephalopathies is associated with the conversion of the cellular prion protein, PrP(C), into a conformationally altered oligomeric form, PrP(Sc). Here we report the crystal structure of the human prion protein in dimer form at 2 A resolution. The dimer results from the three-dimensional swapping of the C-terminal helix 3 and rearrangement of the disulfide bond. An interchain two-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet is formed at the dimer interface by residues that are located in helix 2 in the monomeric NMR structures. Familial prion disease mutations map to the regions directly involved in helix swapping. This crystal structure suggests that oligomerization through 3D domain-swapping may constitute an important step on the pathway of the PrP(C) --> PrP(Sc) conversion.     

The structure of an engineered domain-swapped ribonuclease dimer and its implications for the evolution of proteins toward oligomerization

BACKGROUND: Domain swapping has been proposed as a mechanism that explains the evolution from monomeric to oligomeric proteins. Bovine and human pancreatic ribonucleases are monomers with no biological properties other than their RNA cleavage ability. In contrast, the closely related bovine seminal ribonuclease is a natural domain-swapped dimer that has special biological properties, such as cytotoxicity to tumour cells. Several recombinant ribonuclease variants are domain-swapped dimers, but a structure of this kind has not yet been reported for the human enzyme. RESULTS: The crystal structure at 2 A resolution of an engineered ribonuclease variant called PM8 reveals a new kind of domain-swapped dimer, based on the change of N-terminal domains between the two subunits. The swapping is fastened at both hinge peptides by the newly introduced Gln101, involved in two intermolecular hydrogen bonds and in a stacking interaction between residues of different chains. Two antiparallel salt bridges and water-mediated hydrogen bonds complete a new interface between subunits, while the hinge loop becomes organized in a 3(10) helix structure. CONCLUSIONS: Proteins capable of domain swapping may quickly evolve toward an oligomeric form. As shown in the present structure, a single residue substitution reinforces the quaternary structure by forming an open interface. An evolutionary advantage derived from the new oligomeric state will fix the mutation and favour others, leading to a more extended complementary dimerization surface, until domain swapping is no longer necessary for dimer formation. The newly engineered swapped dimer reported here follows this hypothetical pathway for the rapid evolution of proteins.     

Molecular dynamics simulations of human cystatin C and its L68Q varient to investigate the domain swapping mechanism

Human cystatin C variant (L68Q), one of the amyloidgenic proteins, has been shown to form dimeric structure spontaneously via domain swapping and easily cause amyloid deposits in the brains of patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease or hereditary cystatin C amyloid angiopathy. The monomeric L68Q and wild-type (wt) HCCs share similar structural feature consisting of a core with a five-stranded anti-parallel beta-sheet (beta-region) wrapped around a central helix. In this study, various molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to investigate the conformational fluctuations of the monomeric L68Q and wt HCCs at various combinations of temperature (300 and 500K) and pH (2 and 7) to gain insights into the domain swapping mechanism. The results show that elevated temperature accelerates the disruption of the hydrophobic core and acidic condition promotes the destruction of three salt bridges between beta2 and beta3 in both HCCs. The results also indicate that the interior hydrophobic core of the L68Q variant is relatively unstable, leading to domain swapping more readily comparing to wt HCC under conditions favoring this process. However, these two monomeric HCCs adopt the same mechanism of domain swapping as follows: (i) first, the interior hydrophobic core is disrupted; (ii) subsequently, the central helix departs from the beta-region; (iii) then, the beta2-L1-beta3 hairpin structure unfolds following the so-called "zip-up" mechanism; and (iv) finally, the open form HCC is generated.