Short-range and long-range guidance by slit and its Robo receptors. Robo and Robo2 play distinct roles in midline guidance

Previous studies showed that Roundabout (Robo) in Drosophila is a repulsive axon guidance receptor that binds to Slit, a repellent secreted by midline glia. In robo mutants, growth cones cross and recross the midline, while, in slit mutants, growth cones enter the midline but fail to leave it. This difference suggests that Slit must have more than one receptor controlling midline guidance. In the absence of Robo, some other Slit receptor ensures that growth cones do not stay at the midline, even though they cross and recross it. Here we show that the Drosophila genome encodes three Robo receptors and that Robo and Robo2 have distinct functions, which together control repulsive axon guidance at the midline. The robo,robo2 double mutant is largely identical to slit.     

Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance

Extending axons in the developing nervous system are guided in part by repulsive cues. Genetic analysis in Drosophila, reported in a companion to this paper, identifies the Slit protein as a candidate ligand for the repulsive guidance receptor Roundabout (Robo). Here we describe the characterization of three mammalian Slit homologs and show that the Drosophila Slit protein and at least one of the mammalian Slit proteins, Slit2, are proteolytically processed and show specific, high-affinity binding to Robo proteins. Furthermore, recombinant Slit2 can repel embryonic spinal motor axons in cell culture. These results support the hypothesis that Slit proteins have an evolutionarily conserved role in axon guidance as repulsive ligands for Robo receptors.     

Selecting a longitudinal pathway: Robo receptors specify the lateral position of axons in the Drosophila CNS

On each side of the midline of the Drosophila CNS, axons are organized into a series of parallel pathways. Here we show that the midline repellent Slit, previously identified as a short-range signal that regulates midline crossing, also functions at long range to pattern these longitudinal pathways. In this long-range function, Slit signals through the receptors Robo2 and Robo3. Axons expressing neither, one, or both of these receptors project in one of three discrete lateral zones, each successively further from the midline. Loss of robo2 or robo3 function repositions axons closer to the midline, while gain of robo2 or robo3 function shifts axons further from the midline. Local cues further refine the lateral position. Together, these long- and short-range guidance cues allow growth cones to select with precision a specific longitudinal pathway.     

Binding site for Robo receptors revealed by dissection of the leucine-rich repeat region of Slit

Recognition of the large secreted protein Slit by receptors of the Robo family provides fundamental signals in axon guidance and other developmental processes. In Drosophila, Slit-Robo signalling regulates midline crossing and the lateral position of longitudinal axon tracts. We report the functional dissection of Drosophila Slit, using structure analysis, site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro assays. The N-terminal region of Slit consists of a tandem array of four independently folded leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains, connected by disulphide-tethered linkers. All three Drosophila Robos were found to compete for a single highly conserved site on the concave face of the second LRR domain of Slit. We also found that this domain is sufficient for biological activity in a chemotaxis assay. Other Slit activities may require Slit dimerisation mediated by the fourth LRR domain. Our results show that a small portion of Slit is able to induce Robo signalling and indicate that the distinct functions of Drosophila Robos are encoded in their divergent cytosolic domains.     

Expression of the vertebrate Slit gene family and their putative receptors, the Robo genes, in the developing murine kidney

The slit (sli) gene, encoding a secreted glycoprotein, has been demonstrated to play a vital role in axonal guidance in Drosophila melanogaster by acting as a signalling ligand for the robo receptor (Rothberg, J.M., Jacobs, J.R., Goodman, C.S., Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., 1990. slit: an extracellular protein necessary for development of midline glia and commissural axon pathways contains both EGF and LRR domains. Genes Dev. 4, 2169-2187; Kidd, T., Bland, K.S., Goodman, C. S., 1999. Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila. Cell 96, 785-794). Multiple homologs of both sli and robo have been identified in vertebrates and are thought to play similar roles to their fly counterparts in neural development (Brose, K., Bland, K.S., Wang, K.H., Arnott, D., Henzel, W., Goodman, C.S., Tessier-Lavigne, M., Kidd, T., 1999. Slit proteins bind Robo receptors and have an evolutionarily conserved role in repulsive axon guidance. Cell 96, 795-806). Slit2 has been shown to bind Robo1, mediating both neuronal and axonal guidance in the developing central nervous system (CNS), (Brose et al., 1999; Hu, H., 1999. Chemorepulsion of neuronal migration by Slit2 in the developing mammalian forebrain. Neuron 23, 703-711). Importantly, both gene families display distinct expression patterns outside the CNS (Holmes, G.P., Negus, K., Burridge, L., Raman, S., Algar, E., Yamada, T., Little, M.H., 1998. Distinct but overlapping expression patterns of two vertebrate slit homologs implies functional roles in CNS development and organogenesis. Mech. Dev. 79, 57-72; Yuan, W., Zhou, L., Chen, J.H., Wu, J.Y., Rao, Y., Ornitz, D.M., 1999. The mouse SLIT family: secreted ligands for ROBO expressed in patterns that suggest a role in morphogenesis and axon guidance. Dev. Biol. 212, 290-306). Using in situ hybridization on metanephric explant cultures and urogenital tract sections, the expression patterns of Slit1, 2, 3 and Robo1 and 2 were investigated during murine metanephric development. Slit1 was expressed in the metanephric mesenchyme (MM) surrounding the invading ureteric tree (UT). Slit2 was expressed at the tips of the UT and both Slit2 and Slit3 were expressed at the far proximal end of the comma shaped and S-shaped bodies. Expression of Robo1 was initially diffuse throughout the MM, then upregulated in the pretubular aggregates, and maintained at the distal end of the comma and S-shaped bodies. Robo2 was detected in the induced MM surrounding the arborizing UT tips and later in the proximal end of the S-shaped bodies. Coincident expression of Robo1 with Slit1 in the metanephric mesenchyme and Robo2, Slit2 and Slit3 in the far proximal end of the S-shaped bodies was observed during metanephric development.     

Crossing the midline: roles and regulation of Robo receptors

In the Drosophila CNS, the midline repellent Slit acts at short range through its receptor Robo to control midline crossing. Longitudinal axons express high levels of Robo and avoid the midline; commissural axons that cross the midline express only low levels of Robo. Robo levels are in turn regulated by Comm. Here, we show that the Slit receptors Robo2 and Robo3 ensure the fidelity of this crossing decision: rare crossing errors occur in both robo2 and robo3 single mutants. In addition, low levels of either Robo or Robo2 are required to drive commissural axons through the midline: only in robo,robo2 double mutants do axons linger at the midline as they do in slit mutants. Robo2 and Robo3 levels are also tightly regulated, most likely by a mechanism similar to but distinct from the regulation of Robo by Comm.     

Signalling by semaphorin receptors: cell guidance and beyond

Semaphorins are a large family of secreted or cell-bound signals, known to guide axons in developing nervous tissue. They are expressed in a variety of adult and embryonic tissues and are thought to have a broader spectrum of functions. Recent evidence suggests that semaphorins and their receptors play a key role in the control of cellular interactions, most likely in cell-cell repulsion. A subset of semaphorins interacts with neuropilins - cell-surface molecules lacking a signalling-competent cytoplasmic domain. Another large family of transmembrane molecules, namely plexins, bind specifically to semaphorins. Thus plexins, alone, or in association with neuropilins, behave as fully functional semaphorin receptors. The intracellular responses elicited by plexins are unknown, but their large cytoplasmic moiety, containing the strikingly conserved sex-plexin (SP) domain, is likely to trigger novel signal-transduction pathways.     

Short-range interactions and size of ligands bound to DNA strongly influence adsorptive phase transition caused by long-range interactions

Long-range interaction between all the ligands bound to DNA molecule may give rise to adsorption with the character of phase transition of the first kind (D. Y. Lando, V. B. Teif, J. Biomol. Struct & Dynam. 18, 903-911 (2000)). In this case, the binding curve, c(c(o)), is characterized by a sudden change of the relative concentration of bound ligands ((c)) at a critical concentration of free (unbound) ligands, c(o)=c(ocr), from a low c value to a high one where c(o) is molar concentration of free ligands. Such a transition might be caused by some types of DNA condensation or changes in DNA topology. For the study of the conditions necessary for adsorption with the character of phase transition, a calculation procedure based on the method of the free energy minimum is developed. The ligand size and two types of interactions between ligands adsorbed on DNA molecule are taken into consideration: long-range interaction between all the ligands bound to DNA and contact interactions between neighboring ligands. It was found that a) Stronger long-range interaction is required for longer ligands to induce phase transition that is occurred at greater c(ocr) values; b) Pure contact interaction between neighboring ligands can not itself initiate phase transition. However contact cooperativity strongly decreases the threshold value of energy of long-range interaction necessary to give rise to the transition.     

Developmental guidance of embryonic corneal innervation: Roles of Semaphorin3A and Slit2

The cornea is one of the most densely innervated structures of the body. In the developing chicken embryo, nerves from the ophthalmic trigeminal ganglion (OTG) innervate the cornea in a series of spatially and temporally regulated events. However, little is known concerning the signals that regulate these events. Here we have examined the involvement of the axon guidance molecules Semaphorin3A and Slit2, and their respective receptors, Neuropilin-1 and Robo2. Expression analyses of early corneas suggest an involvement of both Semaphorin3A and Slit2 in preventing nerves from entering the corneal stroma until the proper time (i.e., they serve as negative regulators), and analyses of their receptors support this conclusion. At later stages of development the expression of Semaphorin3A is again consistent with its serving as a negative regulator—this time for nerves entering the corneal epithelium. However, expression analyses of Robo2 at this stage raised the possibility that Slit2 had switched from a negative regulator to a positive regulator. In support of such a switch, functional analyses-by addition of recombinant Slit2 protein or immunoneutralization with a Slit2 antibody-showed that at an early stage Slit2 negatively regulates the outgrowth of nerves from the OTG, whereas at the later stage it positively regulated the growth of nerves by increasing nerve branching within the corneal epithelium.     

Slit proteins: key regulators of axon guidance, axonal branching, and cell migration

In the past year, Slit proteins have been identified as important regulators of axon guidance and cell migration in Drosophila and vertebrates. Remarkably, they were simultaneously identified as negative regulators, repelling various axonal and cell migrations in both invertebrates and vertebrates, and as positive regulators, stimulating branching and extension of at least one class of axons in vertebrates.     

Proteolysis and membrane capture of F-spondin generates combinatorial guidance cues from a single molecule

The formation of neuronal networks is governed by a limited number of guidance molecules, yet it is immensely complex. The complexity of guidance cues is augmented by posttranslational modification of guidance molecules and their receptors. We report here that cleavage of the floor plate guidance molecule F-spondin generates two functionally opposing fragments: a short-range repellent protein deposited in the membrane of floor plate cells and an adhesive protein that accumulates at the basement membrane. Their coordinated activity, acting respectively as a short-range repellant and a permissive short-range attractant, constricts commissural axons to the basement membrane beneath the floor plate cells. We further demonstrate that the repulsive activity of the inhibitory fragment of F-spondin requires its presentation by the lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) receptors apolipoprotein E receptor 2, LRP2/megalin, and LRP4, which are expressed in the floor plate. Thus, proteolysis and membrane interaction coordinate combinatorial guidance signaling originating from a single guidance cue.     

Histone modifications: signalling receptors and potential elements of a heritable epigenetic code

The genetic code epitomises simplicity, near universality and absolute predictive power. By contrast, epigenetic information, in the form of histone modifications, is characterised by complexity, diversity and an overall tendency to respond to changes in genomic function rather than to predict them. Perhaps the transient changes in histone modifications involved in intranuclear signalling and ongoing chromatin functions mask stable, predictive modifications that lie beneath. The current rapid progress in unravelling the diversity and complexity of epigenetic information might eventually reveal an underlying histone or epigenetic code. But whether it does or not, it will certainly provide unprecedented opportunities, both for understanding how the genome responds to environmental and metabolic change and for manipulating its activities for experimental and therapeutic benefit.     

Logic of the genetic code: Conservation of long-range interactions among amino acids as a prime factor

Any statement on the optimality of the existing code ought to imply that this code is ideal for conserving a certain hierarchy of properties while implying that other codes may have been better suited for conservation of other hierarchies of properties. We have evaluated the capability of mutations in the genetic code to convert one amino acid into another in relation to the consequent changes in physical properties of those amino acids. A rather surprising result emerging from this analysis is that the genetic code conserves long-range interactions among amino acids and not their short-range stereochemical attributes. This observation, based directly on the genetic code itself and the physical properties of the 20 amino acids, lends credibility to the idea that the genetic code has not originated by a frozen accident (the null hypothesis rejected by these studies) nor are stereochemical attributes particularly useful in our understanding of what makes the genetic code ‘tick’. While the argument that replacement of, say, an aspartate by a glutamate is less damaging than replacement by arginine makes sense, in order to subject such statements to rigorous statistical tests it is essential to define what constitutes a random sample for the genetic code. The present investigation describes one possible specification. In addition to obvious statistical considerations of testing hypotheses, this procedure points to the more exciting notion that alternative codes may have existed.     

Attractive and repulsive functions of Slit are mediated by different receptors in the Drosophila trachea

Oxygen delivery in many animals is enabled by the formation of unicellular capillary tubes that penetrate target tissues to facilitate gas exchange. We show that the tortuous outgrowth of tracheal unicellular branches towards their target tissues is controlled by complex local interactions with target cells. Slit, a phylogenetically conserved axonal guidance signal, is expressed in several tracheal targets and is required both for attraction and repulsion of tracheal branches. Robo and Robo2 are expressed in different branches, and are both necessary for the correct orientation of branch outgrowth. At the CNS midline, Slit functions as a repellent for tracheal branches and this function is mediated primarily by Robo. Robo2 is necessary for the tracheal response to the attractive Slit signal and its function is antagonized by Robo. We propose that the attractive and repulsive tracheal responses to Slit are mediated by different combinations of Robo and Robo2 receptors on the cell surface.