Shell fights in the hermit crabPagurus geminus: Effect of cheliped use and shell rapping

In shell fights of the hermit crab,Pagurus geminus, frequently it is observed that large crabs (attackers) grasp the thoracic appendage of small crabs (defenders) with the major cheliped and pull the smaller crabs out of their shells. If this is a standard occurrence and result, then the interaction should not be called a “negotiation” (Hazlett 1978). The role of cheliped use by the attckers in the eviction of defenders was therefore studied using crabs with tubes on their chelipeds, and the effect of shell rapping, which is thought to be necessary for eviction, was studied using crabs without shells. The experimental crabs evicted the defenders but fighting was significantly prolonged. Therefore, the negotiation model cannot be rejected. Specific aspects of shell fights in hermit crabs are discussed.     

Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights

Aggressive interactions between animals are often settled by the use of repeated signals that reduce the risk of injury from combat but are expected to be costly. The accumulation of lactic acid and the depletion of energy stores may constrain activity rates during and after fights and thus represent significant costs of signalling. We tested this by analysing the concentrations of lactate and glucose in the haemolymph of hermit crabs following agonistic interactions over the ownership of the gastropod shells that they inhabit. Attackers and defenders play distinct roles of sender and receiver that are fixed for the course of the encounter. Attackers perform bouts of 'shell rapping', which vary in vigour between attackers and during the course of the encounter, and are a key predictor of victory. In contrast to the agonistic behaviour of other species, we can quantify the vigour of fighting. We demonstrate, to our knowledge for the first time, an association between the vigour of aggressive activity and a proximate cost of signalling. We show that the lactate concentration in attackers increases with the amount of shell rapping, and that this appears to constrain the vigour of subsequent rapping. Furthermore, attackers, but not defenders, give up when the concentration of lactate is high. Glucose levels in attackers also increase with the amount of rapping they perform, but do not appear to influence their decision to give up. Defenders are more likely to lose when they have particularly low levels of glucose. We conclude that the two roles use different decision rules during these encounters.     

The power of shell rapping influences rates of eviction in hermit crabs

Hermit crabs fight for ownership of shells, and shell exchangemay occur after a period of shell rapping, involving the initiatingor attacking crab bringing its shell rapidly and repeatedlyinto contact with the shell of the noninitiator or defender,in a series of bouts. The temporal pattern of rapping containsinformation about the motivation and/or relative resource holdingpotential (RHP) of the initiator and acts as a repeated signalof stamina. Here we investigated the role of the force withwhich the rapping is performed and how this is related to thetemporal pattern of rapping by rubberizing the external surfaceof shells. Initiators that are prevented from rapping withtheir usual level of force persist with the activity for longer over the whole encounter but use fewer raps per bout and areless likely to effect an exchange than those supplied withcontrol shells. The fact that the force of rapping affectsthe likelihood of a crab being victorious suggests that eitherthe force of rapping contains information about motivation orRHP or that force directly affects noninitiators, reducingtheir ability to maintain an adequate grip on their shells.The data suggest that shell rapping is an agonistic signalrather than one that provides information useful to the noninitiator,as has been suggested by the negotiation model of shell exchange.     

Analysis of repeated signals during shell fights in the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus

Shell exchanges between hermit crabs may occur after a period of shell rapping, when the initiating or attacking crab brings its shell rapidly and repeatedly into contact with the shell of the non-initiator or defender, in a series of bouts. There are two opposing models of hermit crab shell exchange and the function of shell rapping. The negotiation model views shell exchange as a mutualistic activity, in which the initiator supplies information about the quality of its shell via the fundamental frequency of the rapping sound. The aggression model views shell rapping as either detrimental to the defending crab, or as providing it with information about the initiator''s ability or motivation to continue, or both. The negotiation model makes no predictions about the temporal pattern of rapping, but under the aggression model it would be expected that crabs that rapped more vigorously would be more likely to effect an exchange. Repeating the signal could be expected under either model. Crabs that achieve an exchange rap more vigorously, rapping is more persistent when a clear gain in shell quality may be achieved, and the vigour is greater when the relative resource-holding potential (or ''fighting ability'') is high. These findings support the aggression model rather than the negotiation model. Contrary to the predictions of game theory, crabs that do not effect an exchange appear to signal that they are about to give up. The data suggest that rapping is performed repeatedly because the accumulation of all of the performances acts as a signal of stamina.     

Shell fights in the hermit crabPagurus geminus: Aggressive act with mutual gain

The shell exchange of the hermit crabPagurus geminus was investigated to see whether it is based on negotiation (Hazlett 1978) or aggression (Elwood & Glass 1981) between the 2 interactants. Two conditions were adopted: the mutualistic condition in which both participants gain from resulting shell exchange, and the competitive condition in which one interactant gains at the expense of the other. The assumption is that if the interactants negotiate, then a higher, and/or quicker, rate of shell exchanges occurs in the mutualistic condition than in the competitive condition. Almost all the defenders (smaller crabs) were evicted from their shells in both of the conditions. No significant difference was detected in the fight time between the conditions, suggesting a low probability of negotiation. In the second experiment, the attackers (larger crabs) were deprived of the use of their chelipeds, allowing me to observe defenders' behavior when they were not subjected to forced eviction. In this case, the defenders evacuated their shells significantly more quickly under competitive conditions, but remained in the shell much longer under the mutualistic condition, indicating that the shell exchange of this species involves no negotiation. The function of shell rapping and the possibilitics of mutual gain in the aggressive interaction are discussed.     

Analysis of the finescale timing of repeated signals: does shell rapping in hermit crabs signal stamina?

Hermit crabs, Pagurus bernhardus, sometimes exchange shells after a period of shell rapping, when the initiating or attacking crab brings its shell rapidly and repeatedly into contact with the shell of the noninitiator or defender in a series of bouts. Bouts are separated by pauses, and raps within bouts are separated by very short periods called 'gaps'. Since within-contest variation is missed when signals are studied by averaging performance rates over entire contests, we analysed the fine within-bout structure of this repeated, aggressive signal. We found that the pattern is consistent with high levels of fatigue in initiators. The duration of the gaps between individual raps increased both within bouts and from bout to bout, and we conclude that this activity is costly to perform. Furthermore, long pauses between bouts is correlated with increased vigour of rapping in the subsequent bout, which suggests that the pause allows for recovery from fatigue induced by rapping. These between-bout pauses may be assessed by noninitiators and provide a signal of stamina. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.     

Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs

When animals engage in fights they face a series of decisions, which are based on the value of the contested resource and either their relative or their absolute fighting ability. Certain correlates of fighting ability or 'resource holding potential' such as body size are fixed but physiological correlates are expected to vary during the encounter. We examine the role of energy reserves in determining fight outcomes and parameters during 'shell fighting' in hermit crabs. During these fights, the two contestants perform very different roles of attacker and defender. We show that the balance of the total energy pool, in the form of glucose and glycogen, determines the ability of defenders to resist eviction from their shells. Low glucose in evicted defenders is not caused by depletion of energy reserves, rather mobilization of glycogen appears to be the result of a strategic decision about whether to resist effectively, based on the perceived fighting ability of the attacker. Attackers, however, always initiate the fight so such a decision for this role appears unlikely. In addition to influencing decisions and ability during fights, physiological correlates of fighting ability can in turn be influenced by strategic decisions.     

Power of shell-rapping signals influences physiological costs and subsequent decisions during hermit crab fights

Understanding the costs of signals used in fights is the key to understanding decisions made by contestants. Hermit crabs use shell rapping. This is a clearly defined agonistic signal, which can be quantified in temporal terms and in the power of the key shell-rapping signal component. We examine the relationship between the power expended by attacking hermit crabs and their consequent lactate levels. High power expenditure over the whole fight leads to high lactate, and attackers give up when lactate is high. Some defenders give up early in fights, particularly if the power of raps in early bouts they receive is high. These defenders and those not allowed to fight have low glucose, but those that successfully resist eviction have high glucose. Glucose is mobilized in an attempt to resist; nevertheless, some defenders that attempt resistance are still evicted by persistent attackers. Thus, early power of the signal is a major determinant of success for attackers, albeit at a cost. These data show the link between power, repetition of a signal, metabolic consequences and decisions of contestants in fights. The different activities, decisions and costs of the two roles are not adequately described by existing models of contests.     

How resource quality differentially affects motivation and ability to fight in hermit crabs

Contesting animals typically gather information about the resource value and that information affects fight motivation. However, it is possible that particular resource characteristics alter the ability to fight independently of the motivation. Using hermit crabs, we investigate how the resource in terms of shell quality affects both motivation and ability to fight. These crabs fight for shells, but those shells have to be carried and may impose physiological costs that impede fight vigour. We find that the shell has different effects on motivation and ability. Potential attackers in very small shells were highly motivated to attack but, rather than having enhanced ability, unexpectedly quickly fatigued and subsequently were not more successful in the fights than were crabs in larger shells. We also examined whether defending crabs could gather information about the attacker''s shell from the vigour of the attack. Defending crabs gave up quickly when a potential gain had been assessed, indicating that such information had been gathered. However, there was no indication that this could be owing to the activity of the attacker and the information is probably gathered via visual assessment of the shell.     

Cyber War Game in Temporal Networks

In a cyber war game where a network is fully distributed and characterized by resource constraints and high dynamics, attackers or defenders often face a situation that may require optimal strategies to win the game with minimum effort. Given the system goal states of attackers and defenders, we study what strategies attackers or defenders can take to reach their respective system goal state (i.e., winning system state) with minimum resource consumption. However, due to the dynamics of a network caused by a node’s mobility, failure or its resource depletion over time or action(s), this optimization problem becomes NP-complete. We propose two heuristic strategies in a greedy manner based on a node’s two characteristics: resource level and influence based on k-hop reachability. We analyze complexity and optimality of each algorithm compared to optimal solutions for a small-scale static network. Further, we conduct a comprehensive experimental study for a large-scale temporal network to investigate best strategies, given a different environmental setting of network temporality and density. We demonstrate the performance of each strategy under various scenarios of attacker/defender strategies in terms of win probability, resource consumption, and system vulnerability.     

Attack and defensive behaviour in the albino rat

Attack of dominant colony males of an albino rat (Rattus norvegicus) strain, on introduced strangers, produced a non-random distribution of bites, with ventral trunk virtually never bitten. Also, vibrissae-contact of attacker and defender interfered with bites to the defender's head and upper back. The specific agonistic reactions of attacking and defending rats appeared to involve strategies based on these limitation on attack: defenders utilized 'boxing' and lying 'on-the-back' behaviour, which interposed ventral trunk and vibrissae between attacker and defender. In turn, the 'lateral display' permitted attackers to circumvent the defender's behaviour. Limitations on attack therefore appeared to underlie the specific agonistic behaviour of both attacking and defending rats.     

Same resource,different benefits: hermit crab shell structure advantages owners,but not intruders in agonistic interactions

Resources may confer advantages by enhancing their owners’ fighting ability (resource holding potential; RHP). While the resource-correlated RHP hypothesis has been recognized as a determinant of agonistic success in different taxa, this has mostly been based on assessment of either the intruder or the owner, but only rarely in both contestants. We tested whether the internal structure of shells affects hermit crabs’ RHP, both as owners defending the shell against eviction and as intruders attempting to gain access to an occupied shell. We conducted contests (n?=?60) to compare the success in shell eviction by intruders in intact shells vs. in shells with the columella artificially reduced, and the success of shell retention by owners in intact shells vs. shells with the columella reduced. The internal configuration of the shell showed different resource-correlated RHP effects depending on the individual’s role in the fight. The presence of a columella in the intruder’s shell did not affect the likelihood that they would evict their opponents. However, owners resisted more evictions in shells with intact columella than those in shells with reduced columella. Our results demonstrate that the same resource can offer different RHP advantages to owners and intruders during an agonistic interaction.

     

Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour

Pre-fight displays typically provide honest, but sometimes dishonest, information about resource holding potential and may be influenced by assessment of resource value and hence motivation to acquire the resource. These assessments of potential costs and benefits are also predicted to influence escalated fight behaviour. This is examined in shell exchange contests of hermit crabs in which we establish an information asymmetry about a particularly poor quality shell. The poor shell was created by gluing sand to the interior whereas control shells lacked sand and the low value of the poor shell could not be accurately assessed by the opponent. Crabs in the poor shell showed changes in the use of pre-fight displays, apparently to increase the chances of swapping shells. When the fights escalated, crabs in poor shells fought harder if they took the role of attacker but gave up quickly if in the defender role. These tactics appear to be adaptive but do not result in a major shift in the roles taken or outcome. We thus link resource assessment with pre-fight displays, the roles taken, tactics used during escalation and the outcome of these contests.     

Flexing the abdominals: do bigger muscles make better fighters?

Animal contests often involve the use of repeated signals, which are assumed to advertise stamina, and hence fighting ability. While an individual may be predicted to give up once it has crossed an energetic threshold, costs inflicted by its opponent may also contribute to the giving-up decision. Therefore, physical strength should be of key importance in contests, allowing high signal magnitude as well as potentially inflicting costs. We investigated this using hermit crab shell fights, which employ a 'hybrid signal' of shell rapping, which advertises stamina but also imposes potentially deleterious consequences for the receiver. We examined the links between contest outcomes and two proxies for strength; the protein content and relative mass of hermit crab abdominal muscles, the main muscle group used in shell rapping. Our results indicate that there was no difference in muscle protein between winners and losers, whereas winners had significantly greater muscle mass : body mass ratios. Thus, while stamina has been assumed by theory to be an important determinant of agonistic success, the present results demonstrate the importance of muscle size and thereby strength.     

Morphological traits determine the winner of “symmetric” fights in hermit crabs

This study aimed at investigating in the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus whether some morphological traits and their slight variations might determine the winner of a contest in symmetric pairs, i.e. pairs composed of individuals matched by their overall size. In the pre-experimental phase, 400 crabs were individually kept in isolation for a week to eliminate the effects of their previous social experiences and were allowed to enter adequate shells to equalize their motivation to fight. Then, we formed 200 pairs matched for shell and body size and observed their agonistic behaviour for 15 min. Alphas (and betas) were deemed as those individuals that won more than half of the recorded fights. Finally, crabs were sacrificed and sexed, and 6 and 8 measures were taken of their shells and bodies, respectively. Raw data were converted to compositional data and subjected to an isometric log-ratio transformation prior to statistical analysis. Alphas were found to occupy heavier and wider shells than betas, both characteristics that, together with the correlated high level of encrustation, make the apparent dimension of the crab larger and thus favour that individual during agonistic encounters. As expected, hermit crabs were sexually dimorphic in their chelae, but sexes differed also in the length of the dactylus of their third walking leg and in their body weight. Alphas were heavier than betas and had longer propodi and wider dactyli on the third walking legs than betas. The latter character might be advantageous during shell fights when the walking legs of the attacker are used to hold the defender's shell in the spasmodic shaking and their wider dactyli might assure a firmer seizing of it. Indeed, a correct execution of this pattern allows for the eviction of the defender. Our results suggest that more attention towards variations in morphological traits other than body size might improve our understanding of the factors that affect individual Resource Holding Power and fight dynamics.     

Analysis of multiple aspects of a repeated signal: power and rate of rapping during shell fights in hermit crabs

Repeated activities used by animals during contests are assumedto act as signals advertising the quality of the sender. However,their exact functions are not well understood and observationsfit only a limited set of the predictions made by models ofsignaling systems. Experimental studies of contest behaviortend to focus on analysis of the rate of signaling, but individualperformances may also vary in magnitude. Both of these featurescan vary between outcomes and within contests. We examined changesin the rate and power of shell rapping during shell fights inhermit crabs. We show that both rate and power decline duringthe course of the encounter and that the duration of pausesbetween bouts of shell rapping increases with an index of thetotal effort put into each bout. This supports the idea thatthe vigor of shell rapping is regulated by fatigue and couldtherefore act as a signal of stamina. By examining differentinteracting components of this complex activity, we gain greaterinsight into its function than would be achieved by investigatinga single aspect in isolation.     

Shell wars II: the influence of relative size on decisions made during hermit crab shell fights

The value of contested resources (shells) in hermit crab fights depends on the sizes of the crabs relative to the sizes of the resources. Thus when relative contestant size is the main experimental variable, motivational factors associated with shell size will also be an experimental problem. Two experiments are described that together overcome this problem. Relative crab size influences all stages of shell fights including pre-fight display, escalation, eviction and examination of the opponent's shell by the victor both before and after eviction of the loser. Shell fights occur more often between disparately-sized animals than between those similar in size. This apparent contradiction of recent theory (Maynard-Smith & Parker 1976) is probably due to the high cost of being without a shell and the small chance that an escalated fight will result. Relative crab size influences the time taken in resource assessments and thus the effectiveness of these assessments is also probably influenced. Causal factors influencing each of the major decisions in shell fights are described and although these fights are more complex than most they are in general agreement with theory on animal contests.     

Information transfer during shell exchange in the hermit crab Clibanarius antillensis

The shell exchange behaviour of the hermit crab Clibanarius antillensis was examined for evidence that the non-initiating crab used information about the initiator's shell. Manipulation of the internal volume of the initiator's shell altered the outcome of exchanges in a manner consistent with the negotiations model of resource exchange. It is suggested that the fundamental frequency of shells is detected by crabs during rapping behaviour when the initiator raps its shell against that of the non-initiator.     

Avoidance of drilled gastropod shells by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus at Nahant, Massachusetts

Most hermit crabs depend on empty gastropod shells for shelter; competition for appropriate shells is often severe. This study determined whether shells that have been drilled by naticid gastropods are suitable for occupancy by the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus. Differences in the characteristics of empty shells and those occupied by hermit crabs were assessed at two adjacent field sites in Nahant, Massachusetts. Drilling damage was far more frequent in empty gastropod shells than in shells occupied by hermit crabs, suggesting that individuals of P. longicarpus avoid drilled shells. They did not appear to avoid shells with other forms of damage. Laboratory experiments confirmed that these hermit crabs preferentially chose intact shells over drilled shells, even when the intact shells offered were most suitable for crabs half the weight of those tested. Final shell choices were generally made within 1 h. The hermit crabs apparently discriminated between intact and drilled shells based on tactile cues, since crabs kept in the dark showed the same preference for intact shells. The hermit crabs strongly avoided, to nearly the same extent, artificially drilled shells, naturally drilled shells, and shells with holes artificially drilled on the opposite side of the shell from where they would normally be located. Possible selective forces causing P. longicarpus to show such strong behavioral avoidance of drilled shells include increased vulnerability of crabs in drilled shells to osmotic stress, predation, and eviction by conspecifics.     

A security game approach for strategic conservation against poaching considering food web complexities

Mitigating the poaching pressure on food webs under multiple constraints (including financial and ecological ones) remains an open problem within conservation. Within this field, mathematically modeling the effects of poaching threats on managerial decision-making is a novel approach. To fill this scientific gap, the present paper uses a security game approach to model the interactions between an environmental manager (defender) and a group of profit-seeking pursuit poachers (attackers) who target species which are nodes of the food web. Based upon the non-cooperative Stackelberg game, the objective of the defender (as leader) is to keep the food web at or near equilibrium through optimally manipulating the populations of an optimal subset of species. In contrast, each attacker strives to maximize monetary profit by hunting an optimal population size of the selected species. The model is validated by a numerical example examining the food web of the endangered Persian leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor), which lives in Golestan National Park (GNP), Iran. The model provides an overarching biotic intervention strategy to keep the (1 predator-4 prey) food web near equilibrium, while only 2 prey species (the urial (Ovis vignei) and the red deer (Cervus elaphus)) are directly threatened by poachers. The examination revealed that both species population data and poaching data should be taken into account to set effective multi-species conservation prioritization levels. In a sensitivity analysis approach, it was found that, despite the fact that red deer is endangered and preferred by poachers, the deterrent penalty measure should be 1.5 times greater for poaching urial than red deer. The output analysis illustrated that, in order to bring the urial deterrent penalty measure closer to the red deer one, enforcement measures should be about 2.5 times stricter for poaching urial than red deer. The results specifically yield insight into how to optimally conserve a food web equilibrium under poaching pressure and within several constraints.