采用玉米秸秆水解糖和玉米浆发酵生产丁二酸

研究了以玉米秸秆水解糖为碳源,不同氮源条件下琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenesSF-9的丁二酸发酵产酸能力。结果表明玉米浆可以替代酵母膏作为丁二酸发酵的廉价氮源。厌氧摇瓶丁二酸发酵单因素试验,得到在初糖浓度50 g/L时,玉米浆的较佳用量为20 g/L。在5 L搅拌罐上,考察了不同初始玉米秸秆水解糖浓度对A.succinogenes SF-9发酵生产丁二酸的影响,结果显示高初始秸秆糖浓度对琥珀酸放线杆菌的生长有抑制作用。采用补料分批发酵,发酵60 h丁二酸的产量达到42.7g/L,丁二酸产率82.7%,生产强度0.81 g/(L·h)。丁二酸的产量和生产强度较分批发酵有明显提高。     

响应面优化产琥珀酸放线杆菌生产丁二酸

丁二酸是一种重要的C4化合物平台,可以合成一系列重要化合物。文中对产琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenes GXAS137发酵生产丁二酸培养基成分进行优化。通过单因素和Plackett-Burman试验设计筛选出影响丁二酸发酵的重要参数,采用最陡爬坡实验逼近最大丁二酸生产区域后,利用Box-Behnken设计确定重要参数的最佳水平。筛选结果表明,影响丁二酸产量的重要参数是葡萄糖、酵母提取物和碱式碳酸镁浓度。最佳条件为(g/L)：葡萄糖70.00,酵母提取物9.20,碱式碳酸镁58.10。优化后丁二酸产量达到47.64 g/L。与初始条件 (36.89 g/L) 相比,丁二酸浓度提高了30 %。在最佳工艺条件下得到的试验结果与模型预测值很吻合,说明建立的模型是有效的。     

一株丁二酸高产菌株的筛选鉴定及初步发酵研究

以牛胃内容物为菌源,利用富马酸钠为唯一碳源并加入高浓度丁二酸钠的选择培养基筛选到一株丁二酸产量较高,副产物较少的菌株。经形态学、生理生化鉴定和16S rDNA序列的系统发育分析,该菌株为巴斯德菌科的产琥珀酸放线杆菌,与琥珀酸放线杆菌S.JST序列相似性最高为98.98%,命名为琥珀酸放线杆菌GXAS137,保藏号为M2011399。利用正交试验对发酵条件进行了初步优化,该菌可发酵55 g/L葡萄糖产38.96 g/L丁二酸,具有较好的丁二酸生产潜力。     

一株丁二酸高产菌株的筛选和鉴定

从瘤胃中筛选到一株高产丁二酸生产菌株,为革兰氏阴性菌,短杆状,无芽孢,不运动,兼性厌氧.经形态学、生理生化鉴定和基于16S rRNA序列的系统发育分析,该菌株为巴斯德菌科的产琥珀酸放线杆菌,是产琥珀酸放线杆菌CCUG 43843的变种,二者的序列相似性为99.93%,命名为产琥珀酸放线杆菌A3.5L发酵罐分批发酵实验表明,当发酵培养基中葡萄糖浓度为50g/L时,产琥珀酸放线杆菌A3可以产25.8g/L丁二酸,具有较好的丁二酸生产潜力.     

酿酒酵母发酵高浓度乳清粉生产燃料乙醇

利用酿酒酵母NL22对乳清粉进行分步糖化发酵(SHF)和同步糖化发酵(SSF),对其生产燃料乙醇的条件进行比较,同时考察pH、温度和底物浓度对SHF和SSF过程的影响。结果表明:SHF工艺和SSF工艺都可以实现酿酒酵母NL22对高浓度乳清粉的发酵,但SSF工艺可明显缩短生产周期,提高生产效率。在pH 6和30℃的条件下进行补料同步糖化发酵,最终乙醇质量浓度为118.52 g/L,产率为1.74 g/(L·h)。     

响应面法优化耐高温酵母生产高浓度乙醇

利用耐高温酵母GXASY-10菌株对木薯粉同步糖化(SSF)法生产高浓度乙醇的发酵条件进行了优化。在单因素实验的基础上,首先应用Plackett-Burman试验设计筛选影响酒精高温高浓度发酵的重要参数,采用最陡爬坡实验逼近最大酒精生产区域后,利用Box-Behnken设计确定重要参数的最佳水平。筛选结果表明,影响酒精产量的重要参数是液化时间、糖化酶用量和初始木薯粉(底物)浓度。最佳工艺条件为:液化时间为35min,糖化酶添加量为1.21AGU/g底物,底物浓度为37.62%。20L发酵罐在此条件下(发酵温度37℃,转速100r/min)经过48h发酵,酒精浓度可达16.07%(V/W)。优化条件与初始条件相比较,酒精浓度提高了33%。     

一株琥珀酸产生菌的筛选及鉴定

从牛的瘤胃中筛选获得一株能发酵生产琥珀酸的兼性厌氧菌。对其进行生理生化特性鉴定及16S rRNA基因分析。该菌株短杆状,无鞭毛,革兰氏染色阴性,V-P反应阴性,能发酵多种糖类产酸;其16S rRNA基因与琥珀酸放线杆菌的同源性高达99．8%,认为属于琥珀酸放线杆菌(Actinobacillus succinogenes),并将其命名为琥珀酸放线杆菌(Actinobacillus succinogenes)SW0580,保藏号CGMCC 1593。初步发酵试验表明该菌能发酵60g/L葡萄糖产生25．8g/L的丁二酸。     

重组谷氨酸棒杆菌发酵L-苯丙氨酸培养基的优化

【目的】提高重组谷氨酸棒杆菌发酵L-苯丙氨酸(L-phenylalanine,L-Phe)的产量。【方法】使用正交试验设计以及响应面优化法分别对种子培养基及发酵培养基进行优化,确定了重组谷氨酸棒杆菌发酵L-Phe的最佳种子培养基及最佳发酵培养基。【结果】重组谷氨酸棒杆菌发酵L-Phe最佳种子培养基(g/L):葡萄糖25.0,玉米浆25.0,硫酸铵15.0,硫酸镁1.0,磷酸二氢钾2.0,尿素2.0,p H 6.8-7.0;最佳发酵培养基(g/L):葡萄糖110.0,玉米浆7.0,硫酸铵25.0,硫酸镁1.0,磷酸二氢钾1.0,柠檬酸钠2.0,谷氨酸1.0,碳酸钙25.0,p H 6.8-7.0;在最佳培养基条件下L-Phe产量最高达到9.14 g/L,较优化前的7.46 g/L提高了22.5%。【结论】通过正交试验和响应面分析对重组谷氨酸棒杆菌发酵L-Phe培养基进行优化,明显提高了L-Phe的产量,并确定了葡萄糖、玉米浆和硫酸铵为发酵培养基中影响L-Phe产量的3个关键因子。研究结果为L-Phe的发酵放大提供了依据。     

环境因素对琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的影响

琥珀酸放线杆菌是发酵生产有应用前景的生物基原料-丁二酸的微生物。本研究室从牛瘤胃中筛选获得一株琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenes CGMCC 1593, 分析了环境气体、pH、氧化还原电位(ORP)环境因素对琥珀酸放线杆菌A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的影响。结果表明: CO2不仅提供了A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的最佳气体环境, 也是发酵生产丁二酸的底物之一; MgCO3是A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵过程较好的pH调节剂, 发酵过程维持pH7.1~6.2, 可满足菌体生长与产酸的要求; 发酵液初始ORP过低, 不利于菌体生长, ORP在-270 mV时对丁二酸产生有利。在菌体对数生长期结束时, 通过Na2S·9H2O降低发酵液ORP到-270 mV, 发酵48 h时可产丁二酸37 g/L, 摩尔产率达到129%。这对深入研究A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸具有参考价值。     

环境因素对琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的影响

琥珀酸放线杆菌是发酵生产有应用前景的生物基原料-丁二酸的微生物。本研究室从牛瘤胃中筛选获得一株琥珀酸放线杆菌Actinobacillus succinogenes CGMCC 1593, 分析了环境气体、pH、氧化还原电位(ORP)环境因素对琥珀酸放线杆菌A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的影响。结果表明: CO2不仅提供了A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸的最佳气体环境, 也是发酵生产丁二酸的底物之一; MgCO3是A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵过程较好的pH调节剂, 发酵过程维持pH7.1~6.2, 可满足菌体生长与产酸的要求; 发酵液初始ORP过低, 不利于菌体生长, ORP在-270 mV时对丁二酸产生有利。在菌体对数生长期结束时, 通过Na2S·9H2O降低发酵液ORP到-270 mV, 发酵48 h时可产丁二酸37 g/L, 摩尔产率达到129%。这对深入研究A. succinogenes CGMCC 1593发酵生产丁二酸具有参考价值。     

A comparison of the production of ethanol between simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and separate hydrolysis and fermentation using unpretreated cassava pulp and enzyme cocktail

The processes of separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) were employed using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of ethanol from cassava pulp without any pretreatment. A combination of amylase, cellulase, cellobiase, and glucoamylase produced the highest levels of ethanol production in both the SHF and the SSF method. A temperature of 37 °C, a pH of 5.0, and an inoculum size of 6% were the optimum conditions for SSF. For the batch process at a pulp concentration of 20%, ethanol production levels from SHF and SSF were the highest, at 23.51 and 34.67 g L(-1) respectively, but in the fed-batch process, the levels of ethanol production from SHF and SSF rose to 29.39 and 43.25 g L(-1) respectively, which were 25% and 24.7% higher than those of the batch process. Thus SSF using the fed-batch provided a more efficient method for the utilization of cassava pulp.     

Recent advances in production of succinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass

Production of succinic acid via separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) are alternatives and are environmentally friendly processes. These processes have attained considerable positions in the industry with their own share of challenges and problems. The high-value succinic acid is extensively used in chemical, food, pharmaceutical, leather and textile industries and can be efficiently produced via several methods. Previously, succinic acid production via chemical synthesis from petrochemical or refined sugar has been the focus of interest of most reviewers. However, these expensive substrates have been recently replaced by alternative sustainable raw materials such as lignocellulosic biomass, which is cheap and abundantly available. Thus, this review focuses on succinic acid production utilizing lignocellulosic material as a potential substrate for SSF and SHF. SSF is an economical single-step process which can be a substitute for SHF — a two-step process where biomass is hydrolyzed in the first step and fermented in the second step. SSF of lignocellulosic biomass under optimum temperature and pH conditions results in the controlled release of sugar and simultaneous conversion into succinic acid by specific microorganisms, reducing reaction time and costs and increasing productivity. In addition, main process parameters which influence SHF and SSF processes such as batch and fed-batch fermentation conditions using different microbial strains are discussed in detail.     

Ethanol production from alfalfa fiber fractions by saccharification and fermentation

This work describes ethanol production from alfalfa fiber using separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with and without liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment. Candida shehatae FPL-702 produced 5 and 6.4 g/l ethanol with a yield of 0.25 and 0.16 g ethanol/g sugar respectively by SHF and SSF from alfalfa fiber without pretreatment. With LHW pretreatment using SSF, C. shehatae FPL-702 produced 18.0 g/l ethanol, a yield of 0.45 g ethanol/g sugar from cellulosic solids or ‘raffinate’. Using SHF, it produced 9.6 g/l ethanol, a yield of 0.47 g ethanol/g sugar from raffinate. However, the soluble extract fraction containing hemicelluloses was poorly fermented in both SHF and SSF due to the presence of inhibitors. Addition of dilute acid during LHW pretreatment of alfalfa fiber resulted in fractions that were poorly saccharified and fermented. These results show that unpretreated alfalfa fiber produced a lower ethanol yield. Although LHW pretreatment can increase ethanol production from raffinate fiber fractions, it does not increase production from the hemicellulosic and pectin fractions.     

A comparison between simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and separate hydrolysis and fermentation using steam-pretreated corn stover

Two different process configurations, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF), were compared, at 8% water-insoluble solids (WIS), regarding ethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover. The enzymatic loading in these experiments was 10 FPU/g WIS and the yeast concentration in SSF was 1 g/L (dry weight) of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. When the whole slurry from the pretreatment stage was used as it was, diluted to 8% WIS with water and pH adjusted, SSF gave a 13% higher overall ethanol yield than SHF (72.4% versus 59.1% of the theoretical). The impact of the inhibitory compounds in the liquid fraction of the pretreated slurry was shown to affect SSF and SHF in different ways. The overall ethanol yield (based on the untreated raw material) decreased when SSF was run in absence on inhibitors compared to SSF with inhibitors present. On the contrary, the presence of inhibitors decreased the overall ethanol yield in the case of SHF. However, the SHF yield achieves in the absence of inhibitors was still lower than the SSF yield achieves with inhibitors present.     

Ethanol production from wheat straw by recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5 at high solid loading

Ethanol production by a recombinant bacterium from wheat straw (WS) at high solid loading by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) was studied. The yield of total sugars from dilute acid pretreated WS (150 g/L) after enzymatic saccharification was 86.3 ± 1.5 g/L. The pretreated WS was bio-abated by growing a fungal strain aerobically in the liquid portion for 16 h. The recombinant Escherichia coli strain FBR5 produced 41.1 ± 1.1 g ethanol/L from non-abated WS hydrolyzate (total sugars, 86.6 ± 0.3 g/L) in 168 h at pH 7.0 and 35 °C. The bacterium produced 41.8 ± 0.0 g ethanol/L in 120 h from the bioabated WS by SHF. It produced 41.6 ± 0.7 g ethanol/L in 120 h from bioabated WS by fed-batch SSF. This is the first report of the production of above 4% ethanol from a lignocellulosic hydrolyzate by the recombinant bacterium.     

Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of acid-pretreated rapeseed meal for succinic acid production using Actinobacillus succinogenes

Rapeseed meal was evaluated for succinic acid production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using Actinobacillus succinogenes ATCC 55618. Diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment and subsequent hydrolysis with pectinase was used to release sugars from rapeseed meal. The effects of culture pH, pectinase loading and yeast extract concentration on succinic acid production were investigated. When simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of diluted acid pretreated rapeseed meal with a dry matter content of 12.5% (w/v) was performed at pH 6.4 and a pectinase loading of 2% (w/w, on dry matter) without supplementation of yeast extract, a succinic acid concentration of 15.5 g/L was obtained at a yield of 12.4 g/100g dry matter. Fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation was carried out with supplementation of concentrated pretreated rapeseed meal and pectinase at 18 and 28 h to yield a final dry matter content of 20.5% and pectinase loading of 2%, with the succinic acid concentration enhanced to 23.4 g/L at a yield of 11.5 g/100g dry matter and a productivity of 0.33 g/(Lh). This study suggests that rapeseed meal may be an alternative substrate for the efficient production of succinic acid by A. succinogenes without requiring nitrogen source supplementation.     

Modelling ethanol production from cellulose: separate hydrolysis and fermentation versus simultaneous saccharification and fermentation

In ethanol production from cellulose, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentative conversion may be performed sequentially (separate hydrolysis and fermentation, SHF) or in a single reaction vessel (simultaneous saccharification and fermentation, SSF). Opting for either is essentially a trade-off between optimal temperatures and inhibitory glucose concentrations on the one hand (SHF) vs. sub-optimal temperatures and ethanol-inhibited cellulolysis on the other (SSF). Although the impact of ethanol on cellobiose hydrolysis was found to be negligible, formation of glucose and cellobiose from cellulose were found to be significantly inhibited by ethanol. A previous model for the kinetics of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis was, therefore, extended with enzyme inhibition by ethanol, thus allowing a rational evaluation of SSF and SHF. The model predicted SSF processing to be superior. The superiority of SSF over SHF (separate hydrolysis and fermentation) was confirmed experimentally, both with respect to ethanol yield on glucose (0.41 g g^?1 for SSF vs. 0.35 g g^?1 for SHF) and ethanol production rate, being 30% higher for an SSF type process. High conversion rates were found to be difficult to achieve since at a conversion rate of 52% in a SSF process the reaction rate dropped to 5% of its initial value. The model, extended with the impact of ethanol on the cellulase complex proved to predict reaction progress accurately.     

Caffeic acid production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of kraft pulp using recombinant Escherichia coli

Caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) serves as a building block for thermoplastics and a precursor for biologically active compounds and was recently produced from glucose by microbial fermentation. To produce caffeic acid from inedible cellulose, separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) reactions were compared using kraft pulp as lignocellulosic feedstock. Here, a tyrosine-overproducing Escherichia coli strain was metabolically engineered to produce caffeic acid from glucose by introducing the genes encoding a 4-hydroxyphenyllactate 3-hydroxylase (hpaBC) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and tyrosine ammonia lyase (fevV) from Streptomyces sp. WK-5344. Using the resulting recombinant strain, the maximum yield of caffeic acid in SSF (233 mg/L) far exceeded that by SHF (37.9 mg/L). In the SSF with low cellulase loads (≤2.5 filter paper unit/g glucan), caffeic acid production was markedly increased, while almost no glucose accumulation was detected, indicating that the E. coli cells experienced glucose limitation in this culture condition. Caffeic acid yield was also negatively correlated with the glucose concentration in the fermentation medium. In SHF, the formation of by-product acetate and the accumulation of potential fermentation inhibitors increased significantly with kraft pulp hydrolysate than filter paper hydrolysate. The combination of these inhibitors had synergistic effects on caffeic acid fermentation at low concentrations. With lower loads of cellulase in SSF, less potential fermentation inhibitors (furfural, 5-hydroxymethyfurfural, and 4-hydroxylbenzoic acid) accumulated in the medium. These observations suggest that glucose limitation in SSF is crucial for improving caffeic acid yield, owing to reduced by-product formation and fermentation inhibitor accumulation.

     

Process design and optimization of bioethanol production from cassava bagasse using statistical design and genetic algorithm

Abstract

Bioethanol production from agro-industrial residues is gaining attention because of the limited production of starch grains and sugarcane, and food–fuel conflict. The aim of the present study is to maximize the bioethanol production using cassava bagasse as a feedstock. Enzymatic liquefaction, by α-amylase, followed by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), using glucoamylase and Zymomonas mobilis MTCC 2427, was investigated for bioethanol production from cassava bagasse. The factors influencing ethanol production process were identified and screened for significant factors using Plackett–Burman design. The significant factors (cassava bagasse concentration (10–50?g/L), concentration of α-amylase (5–25% (v/v), and temperature of fermentation (27–37?°C)) were optimized by employing Box–Behnken design and genetic algorithm. The maximum ethanol concentrations of 25.594?g/L and 25.910?g/L were obtained from Box–Behnken design and genetic algorithm, respectively, under optimum conditions. Thus, the study provides valuable insights in utilizing the cost-effective industrial residue, cassava bagasse, for the bioethanol production.