The dimeric structure of the cytochrome bc1 complex prevents center P inhibition by reverse reactions at center N

Energy transduction in the cytochrome bc₁ complex is achieved by catalyzing opposite oxido-reduction reactions at two different quinone binding sites. We have determined the pre-steady state kinetics of cytochrome b and c₁ reduction at varying quinol/quinone ratios in the isolated yeast bc₁ complex to investigate the mechanisms that minimize inhibition of quinol oxidation at center P by reduction of the b_H heme through center N. The faster rate of initial cytochrome b reduction as well as its lower sensitivity to quinone concentrations with respect to cytochrome c₁ reduction indicated that the b_H hemes equilibrated with the quinone pool through center N before significant catalysis at center P occurred. The extent of this initial cytochrome b reduction corresponded to a level of b_H heme reduction of 33%–55% depending on the quinol/quinone ratio. The extent of initial cytochrome c₁ reduction remained constant as long as the fast electron equilibration through center N reduced no more than 50% of the b_H hemes. Using kinetic modeling, the resilience of center P catalysis to inhibition caused by partial pre-reduction of the b_H hemes was explained using kinetics in terms of the dimeric structure of the bc₁ complex which allows electrons to equilibrate between monomers.     

Rapid electron transfer between monomers when the cytochrome bc1 complex dimer is reduced through center N

We have obtained evidence for electron transfer between cytochrome b subunits of the yeast bc(1) complex dimer by analyzing pre-steady state reduction of cytochrome b in the presence of center P inhibitors. The kinetics and extent of cytochrome b reduced by quinol in the presence of variable concentrations of antimycin decreased non-linearly and could only be fitted to a model in which electrons entering through one center N can equilibrate between the two cytochrome b subunits of the bc(1) complex dimer. The b(H) heme absorbance in a bc(1) complex inhibited at center P and preincubated with substoichiometric concentrations of antimycin showed a red shift upon the addition of substrate, which indicates that electrons from the uninhibited center N in one monomer are able to reach the b(H) heme at the antimycin-blocked site in the other. The extent of cytochrome b reduction by variable concentrations of menaquinol could only be fitted to a kinetic model that assumes electron equilibration between center N sites in the dimer. Kinetic simulations showed that non-rate-limiting electron equilibration between the two b(H) hemes in the dimer through the two b(L) hemes is possible upon reduction through one center N despite the thermodynamically unfavorable b(H) to b(L) electron transfer step. We propose that electron transfer between cytochrome b subunits minimizes the formation of semiquinone-ferrocytochrome b(H) complexes at center N and favors ubiquinol oxidation at center P by increasing the amount of oxidized cytochrome b.     

Mutations in cytochrome b that affect kinetics of the electron transfer reactions at center N in the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex

We have examined the pre-steady-state kinetics and thermodynamic properties of the b hemes in variants of the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex that have mutations in the quinone reductase site (center N). Trp-30 is a highly conserved residue, forming a hydrogen bond with the propionate on the high potential b heme (bH heme). The substitution by a cysteine (W30C) lowers the redox potential of the heme and an apparent consequence is a lower rate of electron transfer between quinol and heme at center N. Leu-198 is also in close proximity to the b(H) heme and a L198F mutation alters the spectral properties of the heme but has only minor effects on its redox properties or the electron transfer kinetics at center N. Substitution of Met-221 by glutamine or glutamate results in the loss of a hydrophobic interaction that stabilizes the quinone ligands. Ser-20 and Gln-22 form a hydrogen-bonding network that includes His-202, one of the carbonyl groups of the ubiquinone ring, and an active-site water. A S20T mutation has long-range structural effects on center P and thermodynamic effects on both b hemes. The other mutations (M221E, M221Q, Q22E and Q22T) do not affect the ubiquinol oxidation kinetics at center P, but do modify the electron transfer reactions at center N to various extents. The pre-steady reduction kinetics suggest that these mutations alter the binding of quinone ligands at center N, possibly by widening the binding pocket and thus increasing the distance between the substrate and the bH heme. These results show that one can distinguish between the contribution of structural and thermodynamic factors to center N function.     

Regulatory interactions in the dimeric cytochrome bc(1) complex: the advantages of being a twin

The dimeric cytochrome bc(1) complex catalyzes the oxidation-reduction of quinol and quinone at sites located in opposite sides of the membrane in which it resides. We review the kinetics of electron transfer and inhibitor binding that reveal functional interactions between the quinol oxidation site at center P and quinone reduction site at center N in opposite monomers in conjunction with electron equilibration between the cytochrome b subunits of the dimer. A model for the mechanism of the bc(1) complex has emerged from these studies in which binding of ligands that mimic semiquinone at center N regulates half-of-the-sites reactivity at center P and binding of ligands that mimic catalytically competent binding of ubiquinol at center P regulates half-of-the-sites reactivity at center N. An additional feature of this model is that inhibition of quinol oxidation at the quinone reduction site is avoided by allowing catalysis in only one monomer at a time, which maximizes the number of redox acceptor centers available in cytochrome b for electrons coming from quinol oxidation reactions at center P and minimizes the leakage of electrons that would result in the generation of damaging oxygen radicals.     

The electric field generated by photosynthetic reaction center induces rapid reversed electron transfer in the bc1 complex

The cytochrome bc(1) complex is the central enzyme of respiratory and photosynthetic electron-transfer chains. It couples the redox work of quinol oxidation and cytochrome reduction to the generation of a proton gradient needed for ATP synthesis. When the quinone processing Q(i)- and Q(o)-sites of the complex are inhibited by both antimycin and myxothiazol, the flash-induced kinetics of the b-heme chain, which transfers electrons between these sites, are also expected to be inhibited. However, we have observed in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores, that when a fraction of heme b(H) is reduced, flash excitation induces fast (half-time approximately 0.1 ms) oxidation of heme b(H), even in the presence of antimycin and myxothiazol. The sensitivity of this oxidation to ionophores and uncouplers, and the absence of any delay in the onset of this reaction, indicates that it is due to a reversal of electron transfer between b(L) and b(H) hemes, driven by the electrical field generated by the photosynthetic reaction center. In the presence of antimycin A, but absence of myxothiazol, the second and following flashes induce a similar ( approximately 0.1 ms) transient oxidation of approximately 10% of the cytochrome b(H) reduced on the first flash. From the observed amplitude of the field-induced oxidation of heme b(H), we estimate that the equilibrium constant for sharing one electron between hemes b(L) and b(H) is 10-15 at pH 7. The small value of this equilibrium constant modifies our understanding of the thermodynamics of the Q-cycle, especially in the context of a dimeric structure of bc(1) complex.     

Photo-induced cyclic electron transfer involving cytochrome bc1 complex and reaction center in the obligate aerobic phototroph Roseobacter denitrificans.

Flash-induced redox changes of b-type and c-type cytochromes have been studied in chromatophores from the aerobic photosynthetic bacterium Roseobacter denitrificans under redox-controlled conditions. The flash-oxidized primary donor P+ of the reaction center (RC) is rapidly re-reduced by heme H1 (Em,7 = 290 mV), heme H2 (Em,7 = 240 mV) or low-potential hemes L1/L2 (Em,7 = 90 mV) of the RC-bound tetraheme, depending on their redox state before photoexcitation. By titrating the extent of flash-induced low-potential heme oxidation, a midpoint potential equal to -50 mV has been determined for the primary quinone acceptor QA. Only the photo-oxidized heme H2 is re-reduced in tens of milliseconds, in a reaction sensitive to inhibitors of the bc1 complex, leading to the concomitant oxidation of a cytochrome c spectrally distinct from the RC-bound hemes. This reaction involves cytochrome c551 in a diffusional process. Participation of the bc1 complex in a cyclic electron transfer chain has been demonstrated by detection of flash-induced reduction of cytochrome b561, stimulated by antimycin and inhibited by myxothiazol. Cytochrome b561, reduced upon flash excitation, is re-oxidized slowly even in the absence of antimycin. The rate of reduction of cytochrome b561 in the presence of antimycin increases upon lowering the ambient redox potential, most likely reflecting the progressive prereduction of the ubiquinone pool. Chromatophores contain approximately 20 ubiquinone-10 molecules per RC. At the optimal redox poise, approximately 0.3 cytochrome b molecules per RC are reduced following flash excitation. Cytochrome b reduction titrates out at Eh < 100 mV, when low-potential heme(s) rapidly re-reduce P+ preventing cyclic electron transfer. Results can be rationalized in the framework of a Q-cycle-type model.     

Asymmetric and redox-specific binding of quinone and quinol at center N of the dimeric yeast cytochrome bc1 complex. Consequences for semiquinone stabilization

The cytochrome bc1 complex recycles one of the two electrons from quinol (QH2) oxidation at center P by reducing quinone (Q) at center N to semiquinone (SQ), which is bound tightly. We have analyzed the properties of SQ bound at center N of the yeast bc1 complex. The EPR-detectable signal, which reports SQ bound in the vicinity of reduced bH heme, was abolished by the center N inhibitors antimycin, funiculosin, and ilicicolin H, but was unchanged by the center P inhibitors myxothiazol and stigmatellin. After correcting for the EPR-silent SQ bound close to oxidized bH, we calculated a midpoint redox potential (Em) of approximately 90 mV for all bound SQ. Considering the Em values for bH and free Q, this result indicates that center N preferentially stabilizes SQ.bH(3+) complexes. This favors recycling of the electron coming from center P and also implies a >2.5-fold higher affinity for QH2 than for Q at center N, which would potentially inhibit bH oxidation by Q. Using pre-steady-state kinetics, we show that Q does not inhibit the initial rate of bH reduction by QH2 through center N, but does decrease the extent of reduction, indicating that Q binds only when bH is reduced, whereas QH2 binds when bH is oxidized. Kinetic modeling of these results suggests that formation of SQ at one center N in the dimer allows stabilization of SQ in the other monomer by Q reduction after intradimer electron transfer. This model allows maximum SQ.bH(3+) formation without inhibition of Q binding by QH2.     

Anti-cooperative oxidation of ubiquinol by the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex

We have investigated the interaction between monomers of the dimeric yeast cytochrome bc(1) complex by analyzing the pre-steady and steady state activities of the isolated enzyme in the presence of antimycin under conditions that allow the first turnover of ubiquinol oxidation to be observable in cytochrome c(1) reduction. At pH 8.8, where the redox potential of the iron-sulfur protein is approximately 200 mV and in a bc(1) complex with a mutated iron-sulfur protein of equally low redox potential, the amount of cytochrome c(1) reduced by several equivalents of decyl-ubiquinol in the presence of antimycin corresponded to only half of that present in the bc(1) complex. Similar experiments in the presence of several equivalents of cytochrome c also showed only half of the bc(1) complex participating in quinol oxidation. The extent of cytochrome b reduced corresponded to two b(H) hemes undergoing reduction through one center P per dimer, indicating electron transfer between the two cytochrome b subunits. Antimycin stimulated the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity of the bc(1) complex at low inhibitor/enzyme ratios. This stimulation could only be fitted to a model in which half of the bc(1) dimer is inactive when both center N sites are free, becoming active upon binding of one center N inhibitor molecule per dimer, and there is electron transfer between the cytochrome b subunits of the dimer. These results are consistent with an alternating half-of-the-sites mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation in the bc(1) complex dimer.     

Mutations in cytochrome b that affect kinetics of the electron transfer reactions at center N in the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex

We have examined the pre-steady-state kinetics and thermodynamic properties of the b hemes in variants of the yeast cytochrome bc₁ complex that have mutations in the quinone reductase site (center N). Trp-30 is a highly conserved residue, forming a hydrogen bond with the propionate on the high potential b heme (b_H heme). The substitution by a cysteine (W30C) lowers the redox potential of the heme and an apparent consequence is a lower rate of electron transfer between quinol and heme at center N. Leu-198 is also in close proximity to the b_H heme and a L198F mutation alters the spectral properties of the heme but has only minor effects on its redox properties or the electron transfer kinetics at center N. Substitution of Met-221 by glutamine or glutamate results in the loss of a hydrophobic interaction that stabilizes the quinone ligands. Ser-20 and Gln-22 form a hydrogen-bonding network that includes His-202, one of the carbonyl groups of the ubiquinone ring, and an active-site water. A S20T mutation has long-range structural effects on center P and thermodynamic effects on both b hemes. The other mutations (M221E, M221Q, Q22E and Q22T) do not affect the ubiquinol oxidation kinetics at center P, but do modify the electron transfer reactions at center N to various extents. The pre-steady reduction kinetics suggest that these mutations alter the binding of quinone ligands at center N, possibly by widening the binding pocket and thus increasing the distance between the substrate and the b_H heme. These results show that one can distinguish between the contribution of structural and thermodynamic factors to center N function.     

Regulatory interactions in the dimeric cytochrome bc1 complex: The advantages of being a twin

The dimeric cytochrome bc₁ complex catalyzes the oxidation-reduction of quinol and quinone at sites located in opposite sides of the membrane in which it resides. We review the kinetics of electron transfer and inhibitor binding that reveal functional interactions between the quinol oxidation site at center P and quinone reduction site at center N in opposite monomers in conjunction with electron equilibration between the cytochrome b subunits of the dimer. A model for the mechanism of the bc₁ complex has emerged from these studies in which binding of ligands that mimic semiquinone at center N regulates half-of-the-sites reactivity at center P and binding of ligands that mimic catalytically competent binding of ubiquinol at center P regulates half-of-the-sites reactivity at center N. An additional feature of this model is that inhibition of quinol oxidation at the quinone reduction site is avoided by allowing catalysis in only one monomer at a time, which maximizes the number of redox acceptor centers available in cytochrome b for electrons coming from quinol oxidation reactions at center P and minimizes the leakage of electrons that would result in the generation of damaging oxygen radicals.     

Investigating the Qn site of the cytochrome bc1 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with mutants resistant to ilicicolin H, a novel Qn site inhibitor

The cytochrome bc1 complex resides in the inner membrane of mitochondria and transfers electrons from ubiquinol to cytochrome c. This electron transfer is coupled to the translocation of protons across the membrane by the protonmotive Q cycle mechanism. This mechanism topographically separates reduction of quinone and reoxidation of quinol at sites on opposite sites of the membrane, referred to as center N (Qn site) and center P (Qp site), respectively. Both are located on cytochrome b, a transmembrane protein of the bc1 complex that is encoded on the mitochondrial genome. To better understand the parameters that affect ligand binding at the Qn site, we applied the Qn site inhibitor ilicicolin H to select for mutations conferring resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The screen resulted in seven different single amino acid substitutions in cytochrome b rendering the yeast resistant to the inhibitor. Six of the seven mutations have not been previously linked to inhibitor resistance. Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activities of mitochondrial membranes isolated from the mutants confirmed that the differences in sensitivity toward ilicicolin H originated in the cytochrome bc1 complex. Comparative in vivo studies using the known Qn site inhibitors antimycin and funiculosin showed little cross-resistance, indicating different modes of binding of these inhibitors at center N of the bc1 complex.     

Ubiquinone at center N is responsible for triphasic reduction of cytochrome b in the cytochrome bc(1) complex.

We have examined the pre-steady state reduction kinetics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome bc(1) complex by menaquinol in the presence and absence of endogenous ubiquinone to elucidate the mechanism of triphasic cytochrome b reduction. With cytochrome bc(1) complex from wild type yeast, cytochrome b reduction was triphasic, consisting of a rapid partial reduction phase, an apparent partial reoxidation phase, and a slow rereduction phase. Absorbance spectra taken by rapid scanning spectroscopy at 1-ms intervals before, during, and after the apparent reoxidation phase showed that this was caused by a bona fide reoxidation of cytochrome b and not by any negative spectral contribution from cytochrome c(1). With cytochrome bc(1) complex from a yeast mutant that cannot synthesize ubiquinone, cytochrome b reduction by either menaquinol or ubiquinol was rapid and monophasic. Addition of ubiquinone restored triphasic cytochrome b reduction, and the duration of the reoxidation phase increased as the ubiquinone concentration increased. When reduction of the cytochrome bc(1) complex through center P was blocked, cytochrome b reduction through center N was biphasic and was slowed by the addition of exogenous ubiquinone. These results show that ubiquinone residing at center N in the oxidized cytochrome bc(1) complex is responsible for the triphasic reduction of cytochrome b.     

Glycine-231 residue of the mouse mitochondrial protonmotive cytochrome b: mutation to aspartic acid deranges electron transport

The mouse LA9 HQN-R11 cytochrome b mutant, in which the glycine residue at position 231 is replaced by aspartic acid, has increased resistance to all inhibitors of the Qn redox center. It is shown here that this single amino acid alteration has multiple and unexpectedly diverse effects upon the mitochondrial protonmotive bc1 complex. (1) The specific activities of both succinate- and ubiquinol-cytochrome c oxidoreductases in isolated mitochondria are reduced by approximately 65% in the mutant. The parallel reductions in both oxidoreductase activities are not compatible with simple Q pool kinetics for mitochondrial electron transport. (2) There is also a reduction in the relative concentration of cytochrome b in the mutant when calculated on the basis of mitochondrial protein; this decrease does not account for more than a small portion of the reduced catalytic fluxes. (3) The increased antimycin resistance of the mutant is lost upon solubilization by the detergent dodecyl maltoside of the bc1 complex from mitochondria. (4) In pre-steady-state assays of cytochrome b reduction by quinol, the mutant shows a reduced extent of reduction. It was observed in other experiments that there was less oxidant-induced extrareduction of cytochrome b in the mutant. These results could arise from a lowering of the midpoint potentials of both the cytochrome b-562 and cytochrome b-566 heme groups. Alternatively, these effects may reflect changes at the Qp and Qn quinone/quinol binding sites. (5) An unexplained observation for the mutant is the increased rate of cytochrome c1 reduction in the presence of myxothiazol. (6) These functional alterations in the LA9 HQN-R11 mutant are not accompanied by detectable changes in the spectral properties of the cytochrome b or c1 heme groups.     

Identification and properties of a quinol oxidase super-complex composed of a bc1 complex and cytochrome oxidase in the thermophilic bacterium PS3

Evidence for the presence of a quinol oxidase super-complex composed of a cytochrome bc1 complex and cytochrome oxidase in the respiratory chain of a Gram-positive thermophilic bacterium PS3 is reported. On incubation with an octyl glucoside-solubilized fraction of the total membranes of PS3 anti-serum against PS3 cytochrome oxidase gave an immunoprecipitate that showed both quinol-cytochrome c reductase and cytochrome c oxidase activities. When the cholate-deoxycholate and LiCl-treated membranes of PS3 were solubilized and subjected to ion-exchange chromatography in the presence of octaethyleneglycol dodecyl ether, most of the A-, B-, and C-type cytochromes were copurified as a peak having both quinol-cytochrome c reductase and cytochrome oxidase activities. The immunoprecipitate and quinol oxidase preparation contained hemes a, b, and c in a ratio of about 2:2:3, indicating the presence of one-to-one complex of cytochrome oxidase containing 2 hemes a and one heme c, and a bc1 complex containing 2 hemes b and 2 hemes c. Gel electrophoresis in the presence of dodecyl sulfate showed that the immunoprecipitate and quinol oxidase preparation were composed of seven subunits; those of 51 (56-kDa), 38, and 22 kDa for cytochrome oxidase and those of 29, 23, 21, and 14 kDa for the bc1 complex. The 38-, 29-, and 21 kDa components possessed covalently bound heme c. The apparent molecular mass of the super complex was estimated to be as 380 kDa by gel filtration.     

Regulatory interactions between ubiquinol oxidation and ubiquinone reduction sites in the dimeric cytochrome bc1 complex

We have obtained evidence for conformational communication between ubiquinol oxidation (center P) and ubiquinone reduction (center N) sites of the yeast bc1 complex dimer by analyzing antimycin binding and heme bH reduction at center N in the presence of different center P inhibitors. When stigmatellin was occupying center P, concentration-dependent binding of antimycin occurred only to half of the center N sites. The remaining half of the bc1 complex bound antimycin with a slower rate that was independent of inhibitor concentration, indicating that a slow conformational change needed to occur before half of the enzyme could bind antimycin. In contrast, under conditions where the Rieske protein was not fixed proximal to heme bL at center P, all center N sites bound antimycin with fast and concentration-dependent kinetics. Additionally, the extent of fast cytochrome b reduction by menaquinol through center N in the presence of stigmatellin was approximately half of that observed when myxothiazol was bound at center P. The reduction kinetics of the bH heme by decylubiquinol in the presence of stigmatellin or myxothiazol were also consistent with a model in which fixation of the Rieske protein close to heme bL in both monomers allows rapid binding of ligands only to one center N. Decylubiquinol at high concentrations was able to abolish the biphasic binding of antimycin in the presence of stigmatellin but did not slow down antimycin binding rates. These results are discussed in terms of half-of-the-sites activity of the dimeric bc1 complex.     

The Q cycle of cytochrome bc complexes: a structure perspective

Aspects of the crystal structures of the hetero-oligomeric cytochrome bc(1) and b(6)f ("bc") complexes relevant to their electron/proton transfer function and the associated redox reactions of the lipophilic quinones are discussed. Differences between the b(6)f and bc(1) complexes are emphasized. The cytochrome bc(1) and b(6)f dimeric complexes diverge in structure from a core of subunits that coordinate redox groups consisting of two bis-histidine coordinated hemes, a heme b(n) and b(p) on the electrochemically negative (n) and positive (p) sides of the complex, the high potential [2Fe-2S] cluster and c-type heme at the p-side aqueous interface and aqueous phase, respectively, and quinone/quinol binding sites on the n- and p-sides of the complex. The bc(1) and b(6)f complexes diverge in subunit composition and structure away from this core. b(6)f Also contains additional prosthetic groups including a c-type heme c(n) on the n-side, and a chlorophyll a and β-carotene. Common structure aspects; functions of the symmetric dimer. (I) Quinone exchange with the bilayer. An inter-monomer protein-free cavity of approximately 30? along the membrane normal×25? (central inter-monomer distance)×15? (depth in the center), is common to both bc(1) and b(6)f complexes, providing a niche in which the lipophilic quinone/quinol (Q/QH(2)) can be exchanged with the membrane bilayer. (II) Electron transfer. The dimeric structure and the proximity of the two hemes b(p) on the electrochemically positive side of the complex in the two monomer units allow the possibility of two alternate routes of electron transfer across the complex from heme b(p) to b(n): intra-monomer and inter-monomer involving electron cross-over between the two hemes b(p). A structure-based summary of inter-heme distances in seven bc complexes, representing mitochondrial, chromatophore, cyanobacterial, and algal sources, indicates that, based on the distance parameter, the intra-monomer pathway would be favored kinetically. (III) Separation of quinone binding sites. A consequence of the dimer structure and the position of the Q/QH(2) binding sites is that the p-side QH(2) oxidation and n-side Q reduction sites are each well separated. Therefore, in the event of an overlap in residence time by QH(2) or Q molecules at the two oxidation or reduction sites, their spatial separation would result in minimal steric interference between extended Q or QH(2) isoprenoid chains. (IV) Trans-membrane QH(2)/Q transfer. (i) n/p-side QH(2)/Q transfer may be hindered by lipid acyl chains; (ii) the shorter less hindered inter-monomer pathway across the complex would not pass through the center of the cavity, as inferred from the n-side antimycin site on one monomer and the p-side stigmatellin site on the other residing on the same surface of the complex. (V) Narrow p-side portal for QH(2)/Q passage. The [2Fe-2S] cluster that serves as oxidant, and whose histidine ligand serves as a H(+) acceptor in the oxidation of QH(2), is connected to the inter-monomer cavity by a narrow extended portal, which is also occupied in the b(6)f complex by the 20 carbon phytyl chain of the bound chlorophyll.     

Consequences of the structure of the cytochrome b6f complex for its charge transfer pathways

At least two features of the crystal structures of the cytochrome b6f complex from the thermophilic cyanobacterium, Mastigocladus laminosus and a green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, have implications for the pathways and mechanism of charge (electron/proton) transfer in the complex: (i) The narrow 11 x 12 A portal between the p-side of the quinone exchange cavity and p-side plastoquinone/quinol binding niche, through which all Q/QH2 must pass, is smaller in the b6f than in the bc1 complex because of its partial occlusion by the phytyl chain of the one bound chlorophyll a molecule in the b6f complex. Thus, the pathway for trans-membrane passage of the lipophilic quinone is even more labyrinthine in the b6f than in the bc1 complex. (ii) A unique covalently bound heme, heme cn, in close proximity to the n-side b heme, is present in the b6f complex. The b6f structure implies that a Q cycle mechanism must be modified to include heme cn as an intermediate between heme bn and plastoquinone bound at a different site than in the bc1 complex. In addition, it is likely that the heme bn-cn couple participates in photosytem I-linked cyclic electron transport that requires ferredoxin and the ferredoxin: NADP+ reductase. This pathway through the n-side of the b6f complex could overlap with the n-side of the Q cycle pathway. Thus, either regulation is required at the level of the redox state of the hemes that would allow them to be shared by the two pathways, and/or the two different pathways are segregated in the membrane.     

Structural basis for the mechanism of electron bifurcation at the quinol oxidation site of the cytochrome <Emphasis Type="Italic">bc</Emphasis><Subscript>1</Subscript> complex

At the heart of the Q cycle hypothesis, the cytochrome bc1 complex (bc1) is required to separate the two electrons from a quinol molecule at the quinol oxidation site. Recent studies have brought to light an intricate mechanism for this bifurcated electron transfer. A survey of the protein data bank shows 30 entries for the structures of bc1 and the homologous b6 f complex. These structures provide considerable insights into the structural organization of mitochondrial, bacterial, and plant enzymes. Crystallographic binding studies of bc1 with either quinone reduction (QN) and/or quinol oxidation (QP) site inhibitors offer atomic details on how these compounds interact with residues at their respective sites. Most importantly, the different locations and apparent flexibility observed in crystals for the extrinsic domain of the iron-sulfur protein (ISP) subunit suggest a mechanism for electron bifurcation at the QP site. Analyses of various inhibitor-bound structures revealed two classes of QP site inhibitors: Pm inhibitors that promote ISP mobility and Pf inhibitors that favor the fixation of the ISP conformation. Those analyses also shed light on a possible process by which the ISP motion switch is controlled. The first phase reduction of ISP is shown to be comparable to the reduction of the bL heme by pre-steady state kinetic analysis, whereas the second phase reduction of ISP share similar kinetics with the reduction of the bH heme. The reduction of cyt c1 is measured much slower, indicating that the reduced ISP remains bound at the QP site until the reduced heme bL is oxidized by the heme bH and supporting the existence of a control mechanism for the ISP motion switch.     

On the mechanism of quinol oxidation at the QP site in the cytochrome bc1 complex: studied using mutants lacking cytochrome bL or bH

To elucidate the mechanism of bifurcated oxidation of quinol in the cytochrome bc1 complex, Rhodobacter sphaeroides mutants, H198N and H111N, lacking heme bL and heme bH, respectively, were constructed and characterized. Purified mutant complexes have the same subunit composition as that of the wild-type complex, but have only 9-11% of the electron transfer activity, which is sensitive to stigmatellin or myxothiazol. The Em values for hemes bL and bH in the H111N and H198N complexes are -95 and -35 mV, respectively. The pseudo first-order reduction rate constants for hemes bL and bH in H111N and H198N, by ubiquiniol, are 16.3 and 12.4 s(-1), respectively. These indicate that the Qp site in the H111N mutant complex is similar to that in the wild-type complex. Pre-steady state reduction rates of heme c1 by these two mutant complexes decrease to a similar extent of their activity, suggesting that the decrease in electron transfer activity is due to impairment of movement of the head domain of reduced iron-sulfur protein, caused by disruption of electron transfer from heme bL to heme bH. Both mutant complexes produce as much superoxide as does antimycin A-treated wild-type complex. Ascorbate eliminates all superoxide generating activity in the intact or antimycin inhibited wild-type or mutant complexes.     

Differential efficacy of inhibition of mitochondrial and bacterial cytochrome bc1 complexes by center N inhibitors antimycin, ilicicolin H and funiculosin

We have compared the efficacy of inhibition of the cytochrome bc1 complexes from yeast and bovine heart mitochondria and Paracoccus denitrificans by antimycin, ilicicolin H, and funiculosin, three inhibitors that act at the quinone reduction site at center N of the enzyme. Although the three inhibitors have some structural features in common, they differ significantly in their patterns of inhibition. Also, while the overall folding pattern of cytochrome b around center N is similar in the enzymes from the three species, amino acid sequence differences create sufficient structural differences so that there are striking differences in the inhibitors binding to the three enzymes. Antimycin is the most tightly bound of the three inhibitors, and binds stoichiometrically to the isolated enzymes from all three species under the cytochrome c reductase assay conditions. Ilicicolin H also binds stoichiometrically to the yeast enzyme, but binds approximately 2 orders of magnitude less tightly to the bovine enzyme and is essentially non-inhibitory to the Paracoccus enzyme. Funiculosin on the other hand inhibits the yeast and bovine enzymes similarly, with IC50 approximately 10 nM, while the IC50 for the Paracoccus enzyme is more than 10-fold higher. Similar differences in inhibitor efficacy were noted in bc1 complexes from yeast mutants with single amino acid substitutions at the center N site, although the binding affinity of quinone and quinol substrates were not perturbed to a degree that impaired catalytic function in the variant enzymes. These results reveal a high degree of specificity in the determinants of ligand-binding at center N, accompanied by sufficient structural plasticity for substrate binding as to not compromise center N function. The results also demonstrate that, in principle, it should be possible to design novel inhibitors targeted toward center N of the bc1 complex with appropriate species selectivity to allow their use as drugs against pathogenic fungi and parasites.