Changes in prostate cancer incidence,mortality and survival in relation to prostate specific antigen testing in New South Wales,Australia

BackgroundTo examine changes in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates, and 5-year relative survival, in relation to changes in the rate of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening tests and the use of radical prostatectomy (RP) in the Australian population.MethodsProstate cancer stage-specific incidence rates, 5-year relative survival and mortality rates were estimated using New South Wales Cancer Registry data. PSA screening test rates and RP/Incidence ratios were estimated from Medicare Benefits Schedule claims data. We used multiple imputation to impute stage for cases with “unknown” stage at diagnosis. Annual percentage changes (APC) in rates were estimated using Joinpoint regression.ResultsTrends in the age-standardized incidence rates for localized disease largely mirrored the trends in PSA screening test rates, with a substantial ‘spike’ in the rates occurring in 1994, followed by a second ‘spike’ in 2008, and then a significant decrease from 2008 to 2015 (APC −6.7, 95% CI −8.2, −5.1). Increasing trends in incidence rates were observed for regional stage from the early 2000s, while decreasing or stable trends were observed for distant stage since 1993. The overall RP/Incidence ratio increased from 1998 to 2003 (APC 9.6, 95% CI 3.8, 15.6), then remained relatively stable to 2015. The overall 5-year relative survival for prostate cancer increased from 58.4% (95% CI: 55.0–61.7%) in 1981–1985 to 91.3% (95% CI: 90.5–92.1%) in 2011–2015. Prostate cancer mortality rates decreased from 1990 onwards (1990–2006: APC −1.7, 95% CI −2.1, −1.2; 2006–2017: APC −3.8, 95% CI −4.4, −3.1).ConclusionsOverall, there was a decrease in the incidence rate of localized prostate cancer after 2008, an increase in survival over time and a decrease in the mortality rate since the 1990s. This seems to indicate that the more conservative use of PSA screening tests in clinical practice since 2008 has not had a negative impact on population-wide prostate cancer outcomes.     

Cancer de la prostate : la maladie localisée

Localized prostate cancer is characterized by a tumor confined to the prostate gland at clinical evaluation. Since the onset of PSA screening, the detection of localized prostate cancer has increased. Prognosis factors are clinical stadification, PSA value, PSA doubling time, tumor volume related to needle biopsy pathologic findings (Gleason score, percentage biopsies involved). Treatment depends on tumor prognosis, symptoms and performance status of the patient. Localized prostate cancer can be treated by surgery (radical prostatectomy, high intensity focused ultrasound) or radiotherapy (conformational radiation therapy, brachytherapy). Active follow-up can be proposed to very low risk patients.     

Expression signatures that correlated with Gleason score and relapse in prostate cancer

Predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma remains a challenge when using clinical and pathologic criteria only. We used an array-based DASL assay to identify molecular signatures for predicting prostate cancer relapse in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostate cancers, through gene expression profiling of 512 prioritized genes. Of the 71 patients that we analyzed, all but 3 had no evidence of residual tumor (defined as negative surgical margins) following radical prostatectomy and no patient received adjuvant therapy following surgery. All of the 71 patients had an undetectable serum PSA following radical prostatectomy. Follow-up period was 44+/-15 months. Highly reproducible gene expression patterns were obtained with these samples (average R(2)=0.99). We identified a panel of 11 genes that correlated positively and 5 genes that correlated negatively with Gleason grade. A gene expression score (GEX) was derived from the expression levels of the 16 genes. We assessed the prognostic value of these genes and found the GEX significantly correlated with disease relapse (p=0.007). These results suggest that the approach we used is effective for expression profiling in heterogeneous FFPE tissues for cancer diagnosis/prognosis biomarker discovery and validation.     

Initial experience with single-agent docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer

Patients with locally advanced prostate cancer have worse outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) than patients with more favorable parameters. The findings of large, contemporary, RP series have led investigators at a number of centers to evaluate the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced disease. A currently ongoing study of 28 patients explores the antitumor response of a regimen of single-agent, docetaxel, 40 mg/m(2), administered intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks to patients with locally advanced prostate cancer before RP. Docetaxel has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced, androgen-independent disease. Study results showed that 75% of patients had reductions in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ranging from 9%-79% at the completion of docetaxel therapy. In 25% of the patients, PSA levels increased by 2%-18% from baseline to completion of chemotherapy. In addition, noncastrate levels of testosterone were maintained in all patients. The docetaxel therapy has also been relatively well tolerated. Reporting of the primary endpoint of pathologic response is pending completion of accrual and surgery.     

MAGE-C2/CT10 protein expression is an independent predictor of recurrence in prostate cancer

The cancer-testis (CT) family of antigens is expressed in a variety of malignant neoplasms. In most cases, no CT antigen is found in normal tissues, except in testis, making them ideal targets for cancer immunotherapy. A comprehensive analysis of CT antigen expression has not yet been reported in prostate cancer. MAGE-C2/CT-10 is a novel CT antigen. The objective of this study was to analyze extent and prognostic significance of MAGE-C2/CT10 protein expression in prostate cancer. 348 prostate carcinomas from consecutive radical prostatectomies, 29 castration-refractory prostate cancer, 46 metastases, and 45 benign hyperplasias were immunohistochemically analyzed for MAGE-C2/CT10 expression using tissue microarrays. Nuclear MAGE-C2/CT10 expression was identified in only 3.3% primary prostate carcinomas. MAGE-C2/CT10 protein expression was significantly more frequent in metastatic (16.3% positivity) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (17% positivity; p<0.001). Nuclear MAGE-C2/CT10 expression was identified as predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (p = 0.015), which was independent of preoperative PSA, Gleason score, tumor stage, and surgical margin status in multivariate analysis (p<0.05). MAGE-C2/CT10 expression in prostate cancer correlates with the degree of malignancy and indicates a higher risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Further, the results suggest MAGE-C2/CT10 as a potential target for adjuvant and palliative immunotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.     

Dynamic thiol/disulphide homeostasis before and after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer

Abstract

Thiol groups are important anti-oxidants and essential molecules protecting organism against the harmful effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The aim of our study is to evaluate thiol–disulphide homeostasis with a novel recent automated method in patients with localized prostate cancer (PC) before and six months after radical prostatectomy (RP). 18 patients with PC and 17 healthy control subjects were enrolled into the study. Blood samples were collected from the controls subjects and patients before and six months after RP. Thiol–disulphide homeostasis was determined using a recently developed novel method. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), albumin, total protein, total thiol, native thiol, disulphide and total antioxidant status (TAS) were measured and compared between the groups. Native thiol, total thiol and TAS levels were significantly higher in the control group than the patients before RP (p?<?.001). There was a non-significant increase in the native thiol, total thiol and TAS levels in the patients six months after RP in comparison to the levels before RP (p values .3, .3 and .09, respectively). We found a significant negative correlation between PSA and thiol levels. Our study demonstrated that the decreased thiol and TAS levels weakened anti-oxidant defence mechanism in the patients with PC as indicated. Increased oxidative stress in prostate cancer patients may cause metabolic disturbance and have a role in the aetiopathogenesis of prostate cancer.     

Le cancer de la prostate: Acquis et challenges pour l'an 2000

Principles of the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer at any stage are still improving. Early diagnosis is accessible throughout the use of the PSA test associated with digital rectal examination which lead to indicate transrectal biopsies. This allowed to treat patients at an earlier stage and significantly improved prognosis in the case of organ confined disease. Progress made in the radical prostatectomy technique have contributed to decrease the postoperative morbidity and is the treatment of reference in clinically localized disease. Radiation therapy still remains a valuable alternative, however, results are more difficult to evaluate. Hormonal treatment using androgen deprivation is indicated at the stage of metastasis. LHRH agonist associated with anti antiandrogens are as much efficacious as surgical castration. Unfortunately, the prognosis of advanced disease remains unpredictable. Objectives for the future will be to improve the diagnostic and staging of prostate cancer et to better define therapeutic indications; better understand the effects of androgen deprivation; and to propose new therapies for hormone refractory cancers.     

Place de la prostatectomie radicale dans le traitement du cancer de prostate

The screening of the prostate cancer with PSA has dramatically modified the circumstances of diagnosis. Nowadays, most of the patients have a localized disease. The treatment is based on prognostic factors and the spreading of the tumor. If the cancer is localized, some treatments are available. Among them, the radical prostatectomy can be performed either laparoscopically or by an open approach. Surgical treatment of prostate cancer is proven to be an effective way to decrease the occurrence of locoregional extension and metastatic disease. It has been proven that it allowed diminishing the mortality in patients who have a life expectancy more than 10 years. The side effects of the radical prostatectomy consist of impotency and incontinence which can be rehabilitated. The treatment of locally advanced cancer is a controversial issue that can consist in surgery as a unique treatment or in a multimodal treatment. This text summaries the recommendations of the French association of Urology.     

Finding of no tumor (pT0) in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate features and clinical outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer graded pT0 following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). STUDY DESIGN: Between 1974 and 2001 we performed 1,135 RRPs for cT1-T2 prostate cancer, of which 386 (34%) underwent 3-6 months of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NHT) before RRP. Median clinical follow-up was 53.8 months (range 24-251). Estimation of likelihood events for biochemical relapse was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical differences between curves were calculated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In 24 cases (2.12%) routine histologic workup failed to detect residual tumor. The pT0 group contained a higher proportion of cTla-b patients and a biopsy Gleason score < or =6. A tendency toward lower pre-operatory PSA levels in the pT0 group compared to the pT2-3 group was shown. PSA progression was observed in 3 pT0 patients, all of whom previously underwent NHT. CONCLUSION: Patients pT0 at RRP presented with lower preoperative PSA values and low preoperative Gleason score compared to the pT+ group. Absence of tumor at pathology examination has a different clinical meaning when it occurs following NHT or in untreated patients. Patients pT0 after NHT may have a worse clinical outcome than pT0 untreated patients.     

Regional differences in patient age and prostate cancer characteristics and rates of treatment modalities in favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer across United States SEER registries

BackgroundIntermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous entity and can be distinguished into favorable and unfavorable IR PCa according to biopsy, PSA and cT-stage characteristics. These differences may translate into differences in treatment type.MethodsWe tested for differences in PCa tumor characteristics and differences in active treatment rates (radical prostatectomy [RP], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]) according to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry (2010−2015) in favorable and unfavorable IR PCa. Data were stratified according to individual SEER registries. Further analyses additionally adjusted for PCa baseline characteristics (PSA, cT stage, biopsy Gleason group grading [GGG], percentage of positive biopsy cores).ResultsTabulations according to SEER registries showed that, in favorable IR vs. unfavorable IR, the rates of RP and EBRT respectively ranged from 30.0 to 54.3% vs. 30.3–55.5 % and 8.3–44.7 % vs. 11.5–45.5 %. Differences in age and baseline PCa tumor characteristics also existed in both favorable and unfavorable IR across SEER registries. After adjustment for those baseline patient and PCa characteristics (PSA, cT stage, GGG, percentage of positive biopsy cores), RP and EBRT rates exhibited virtually no residual differences across individual SEER registries, in both favorable (36.0–41.0 % and 26.8–28.1 %) and unfavorable IR PCa (39.2−42.0% and 31.1–33.5 %).ConclusionImportant differences may be identified in treatment rates within the examined 18 SEER registries in favorable and in unfavorable IR PCa. However, the observed differences are virtually entirely explained by differences in baseline PCa characteristics.     

The possible role of chromogranin A as a prognostic factor in organ-confined prostate cancer

The clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in patients who have undergone surgery for localized prostate cancer is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the relationship between serum neuroendocrine markers and well-known prognostic factors in prostate cancer (pathological staging, definitive Gleason score and serum PSA) and to search for correlations between serum chromogranin A (CgA) levels and pathological findings. Forty-one consecutive patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were evaluated. Serum PSA, CgA and neuron-specific enolase were measured immediately before surgery. Twenty-six surgical specimens were phenotypically and immunohistochemically evaluated using an antibody against CgA. Significant correlations were found between serum CgA, pathological staging and Gleason score (p=0.049 and p=0.038, respectively). Serum CgA did not correlate with PSA, patient age, or immunohistochemical findings. There was a significant correlation between positive immunohistochemical CgA staining and Gleason score (p=0.014). An increase in serum CgA levels, independent of PSA values, might be the expression of pathologically more advanced tumor stage and higher Gleason score; this could help to identify a high-risk patient group eligible for adjuvant therapy.     

Imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer

The current diagnosis and management of prostate cancer is largely based on the use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and pathologic risk factors such as Gleason score and clinical stage. The use of serum PSA in clinical practice has resulted in significant stage migration and, as such, imaging modalities historically utilized to stage prostate cancer are no longer able to reliably identify the small amounts of prostate cancer most often found at presentation. Molecular imaging techniques have focused on improving sensitivity and specificity for cancer detection through knowledge of specific attributes of disease biology. The evolution of imaging techniques has created a new role for imaging in the management of prostate cancer.     

前列腺癌患者前列腺体积与肿瘤分级之间关系探讨

目的:探讨国人前列腺癌患者前列腺体积与肿瘤分级之间的关系。方法:回顾我院及武汉大学人民医院2005年1月-2011年10月70例确诊为前列腺癌并行根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者的临床病理资料,采用SPSS13.0软件总结并分析前列腺癌患者前列腺体积与肿瘤分级之间的关系。结果:经直肠前列腺穿刺活检获得肿瘤病理分级与根治性前列切除术获得最终病理分级具有显著差异(P=0.003);在活检及根治性前列腺切除标本中,前列腺体积与高级别肿瘤发生率均呈负相关(P<0.05);小前列腺与阳性手术切缘、前列腺外侵犯及高级别肿瘤在单变量分析中具有相关性(P<0.05),而与精囊腺侵犯及淋巴结侵犯则无相关性(P>0.05);在校正了年龄、体重指数及术前前列腺特异性抗原水平后,前列腺体积与阳性手术切缘、前列腺外侵犯、精囊腺侵犯及高级别肿瘤发生率均呈负相关(OR<1,P<0.05),而与淋巴结侵犯则无相关性(P>0.05)。结论:前列腺体积是高级别前列腺癌的重要预测因子,利用其对高级别肿瘤风险的预测能力可帮助选择最佳治疗方案并进一步提高治疗效果。     

Evolution of the clinical presentation and outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer--changing trends over a ten year period

We demonstrate the evolution of the clinical presentation and outcomes for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at our department, emphasizing epidemiologic significance of changes during the 10-year period. We assessed the annual trends for changes in patients age, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), preoperative versus postoperative stages and Gleason grades, organ confined status and surgical margin status. A total of 488 RRPs were performed from January 1996 to December 2005 with the annual frequency increased from 8 to 129 (1512.5%). Mean patient age increased from 61.5 to 66.12 years in 2005, with the percentage of men aged more than 70 years increased from 12.5 to 26.5%, respectively. The detection of PC based solely on pathological PSA levels (as indication for prostate biopsy) rose impressively from 25.5 to 70% and the rates of postoperative organ-confined disease also increased significantly from 25 to 74.7%. Mean preoperative PSA decreased from 16.7 to 9.89 ng/mL. On the contrary, there was an increase in percentage of patients with preoperative PSA values ranging from 4 to 10 ng/mL (from 20 to 65.4%). Positive surgical margin rate decreased from 49.4 to 25% and percent of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy decreased from 78.5 to 5.4%. Proportion of patients who were undergraded decreased from 75.1 to 31.7%. The rates of understaging have remained relatively stable over the years. During the study period, PC was increasingly detected by prostate biopsy on the basis of a pathological PSA level only and shifted significantly to more organ-confined stages with more favourable outcomes for pathological variables due to a more accurate assessment of clinical stage prior to surgery, reduced use of neoadjuvant therapy and improved surgical technique. Our data also argue strongly that routine PSA testing should be expanded and not restricted.     

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer

Prognostic factors in organ confined prostate cancer will reflect survival after surgical radical prostatectomy. Gleason score, tumour volume, surgical margins and Ki-67 index have the most significant prognosticators. Also the origins from the transitional zone, p53 status in cancer tissue, stage, and aneuploidy have shown prognostic significance. Progression-associated features include Gleason score, stage, and capsular invasion, but PSA is also highly significant. Progression can also be predicted with biological markers (E-cadherin, microvessel density, and aneuploidy) with high level of significance. Other prognostic features of clinical or PSA-associated progression include age, IGF-1, p27, and Ki-67. In patients who were treated with radiotherapy the survival was potentially predictable with age, race and p53, but available research on other markers is limited. The most significant published survival-associated prognosticators of prostate cancer with extension outside prostate are microvessel density and total blood PSA. However, survival can potentially be predicted by other markers like androgen receptor, and Ki-67-positive cell fraction. In advanced prostate cancer nuclear morphometry and Gleason score are the most highly significant progression-associated prognosticators. In conclusion, Gleason score, capsular invasion, blood PSA, stage, and aneuploidy are the best markers of progression in organ confined disease. Other biological markers are less important. In advanced disease Gleason score and nuclear morphometry can be used as predictors of progression. Compound prognostic factors based on combinations of single prognosticators, or on gene expression profiles (tested by DNA arrays) are promising, but clinically relevant data is still lacking.     

Value of percent free prostate-specific antigen for the prediction of pathological stage in men with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To analyze if the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can provide additional information to the combination of local clinical stage, serum PSA and Gleason score in the prediction of final stage and pathological features of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 480 men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy. Total and free PSA were measured in preoperative serum. Clinical stage was T1 in 70.4% of patients and T2 in 29.6%. The biopsy Gleason score ranged between 2 and 4 in 5.6%, between 5 and 7 in 78.4%, and was higher than 7 in 16%. Total serum PSA was below 4.1 ng/mL in 4.3%, between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL in 66.4%, between 10.1 and 20 ng/mL in 22.5%, and higher than 20 in 6.7% of patients. The tumor was organ-confined in 49.8% and specimen-confined in 64.2%, and its pathological features were favorable in 35%. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that percent free PSA has independent predictive value for pathological stage only in the subset of patients with cT1 tumors and serum PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL. In this group the probability of organ-confined cancer was 68.3% if the percent free PSA was above 15 and 56.3% if it was lower (p<0.001). The probability of specimen-confined disease was 86.6% and 71.3%, respectively (p<0.007), and the probability of favorable pathology was 59.8% and 39.6%, respectively (p<0.002). We also found higher rates of organ- and specimen-confined tumors and favorable pathology for every Gleason score when the percent free PSA was higher than 15. CONCLUSIONS: Percent free PSA seems to provide additional information to the combination of clinical stage and Gleason score for the prediction of pathological features only in patients with clinical stage T1c and serum PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL.     

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radical prostatectomy

The most common treatment options for men with clinically localized prostate cancer include radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The choice between these options is often controversial, and selecting the optimal treatment poses a great challenge for patients and physicians. Factors important to the decision include age and life expectancy of the patient, the natural history of the prostate cancer, how curable the disease is, and the morbidity of treatment. Use of these criteria to select treatment for a healthy, 70-year-old man presenting with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum prostate-specific antigen of 12 ng/mL, and an adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 8 that is present in 2 of 12 biopsy cores would lead to the choice of radical prostatectomy over radiation therapy. Data show that such a patient has a life expectancy of more than 12.3 years if the prostate cancer can be cured and a high probability of dying from the disease if it is not cured. Data further show that radical prostatectomy in such a patient would confer a survival advantage over radiation therapy without resulting in greater complications or reduction in quality of life.     

Correlation of modified Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma with age, serum prostate specific antigen and tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of biopsy grade with age, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy tumor extent using the conventional and modified Gleason grading systems. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 828 consecutive needle biopsy specimens of prostate carcinoma were collected from the years 1995 and 2000 (graded with conventional Gleason grading) and 2006 and 2007 (graded with modified Gleason grading). RESULTS: Both conventional and modified Gleason grading correlated with age, serum PSA, percent positive biopsies and percent cancer length. In 2006-2007, the patients were on average younger and more biopsy cores were taken per patient. Serum PSA and percent positive cores were lower than in the 1995 and 2000 group, indicating a stage shift downward, but the Gleason scores were nevertheless higher. CONCLUSION: Conventional and modified Gleason grading both correlated with age, serum PSA and cancer involvement in needle biopsies. With modified Gleason grading there is a grade shift upward despite the downstaging that has been observed in recent years.     

Current Clinical Applications of the In-capromab Pendetide Scan (ProstaScint(R) Scan, Cyt-356)

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been extremely helpful in the detection of new or recurrent prostate cancer. However, localization of the recurrent tumor has been challenging with currently available radiographic modalities. The (111)In-capromab pendetide scan was developed to diagnose accurately and, more importantly, localize and stage a new or recurrent prostate cancer. Studies suggest that the (111)In-capromab pendetide scan can provide more accurate staging of clinically localized prostate cancer prior to staging lymphadenectomy or definitive therapy. It can also provide valuable information when local adjuvant radiation therapy is considered in men with biochemical cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy.