Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by acidogenous yoghurt

Serial concentrations of aflatoxin B₁ ranged from 200 to 1000 p.p.b. were assayed for detoxification by acidogenous yoghurt. Thin-layer chromatography analysis revealed a complete transformation of 800 p.p.b. of aflatoxin B₁ to a new fluorescing compound corresponding to aflatoxin B_2a which is referred as hydroxydihydroaflatoxin B₁. Partial conversion was present in yoghurt sample containing 1000 p.p.b. Toxicity test on chickens, confirmed Ciegler findings.     

Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria

Specific lactic acid bacterial strains remove toxins from liquid media by physical binding. The stability of the aflatoxin B₁ complexes formed with 12 bacterial strains in both viable and nonviable (heat- or acid-treated) forms was assessed by repetitive aqueous extraction. By the fifth extraction, up to 71% of the total aflatoxin B₁ remained bound. Nonviable bacteria retained the highest amount of aflatoxin B₁. Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) and L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 (DSM 7061) removed aflatoxin B₁ from solution most efficiently and were selected for further study. The accessibility of bound aflatoxin B₁ to an antibody in an indirect competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suggests that surface components of these bacteria are involved in binding. Further evidence is the recovery of around 90% of the bound aflatoxin from the bacteria by solvent extraction. Autoclaving and sonication did not release any detectable aflatoxin B₁. Variation in temperature (4 to 37°C) and pH (2 to 10) did not have any significant effect on the amount of aflatoxin B₁ released. Binding of aflatoxin B₁ appears to be predominantly extracellular for viable and heat-treated bacteria. Acid treatment may permit intracellular binding. In all cases, binding is of a reversible nature, but the stability of the complexes formed depends on strain, treatment, and environmental conditions.     

Specific Features of Albumin Interactions with Hemiacetals of Aflatoxins and Sterigmatocystin

Aflatoxin B_2a (AB_2a), aflatoxin G_2a (AG_2a), and the hemiacetal of sterigmatocystin have been shown to form immunoreactive conjugates with albumin. The conjugates were formed following incubation of solution mixtures at room temperature for 1 h, as demonstrated by spectrophotometry and enzyme immunoassay. Anti-AB_2a antibodies reacted with AB_2a, aflatoxin B₁, and aflatoxin B₂ (100, 8.8, and 5.9%, respectively); a similar result was obtained for anti-AG_2a antibodies reacting with AG_2a, aflatoxin G₁, and aflatoxin G₂ (100, 2.5, and <1.0%, respectively). Binding of anti-AB_2a and anti-AG_2a antibodies to solid-phase conjugates of AB_2a or AG_2a exhibited similar analytical characteristics.     

Production of aflatoxin byAspergillus parasiticus and its control

The aim of the present work was to investigate the production of aflatoxin byAspergillus parasiticus and to find out the possible ways to control it. Of 40 food samples collected from Abha region, Saudi Arabia, only 25% were contaminated with aflatoxins. Oil-rich commodities had the highly contaminated commodities by fungi and aflatoxins while spices were free from aflatoxins.Bacillus megatertum andB cereus were suitable for microbiological assay of aflatoxins. Czapek’s-Dox medium was found a suitable medium for isolation of fungi from food samples. The optimal pH for the growth ofA. parasiticus and its productivity of aflatoxin B₁ was found at 6.0, while the best incubation conditions were found at 30°C for 10 days. D-glucose was the best carbon source for fungal growth, as well as aflatoxin production. Corn steep liquor, yeast extract and peptone were the best nitrogen sources for both fungal growth and toxin production (NH₄)₂HPO₄ (1.55 gL^-1) and NaNO₂ (1.6 gL^-1) reduced fungal growth and toxin production with 37.7% and 85%, respectively. Of ten amino acids tested, asparagine was the best for aflatoxin B₁ production. Zn²⁺ and Co²⁺ supported significantly both fungal growth, as well as, aflatoxin B₁ production at the different tested concentrations. Zn²⁺ was effective when added toA. parasiticus growth medium at the first two days of the culture age. The other tested metal ions expressed variable effects depending on the type of ion and its concentration. Water activity (a_w) was an important factor controlling the growth ofA. parasiticus and toxin production. The minimum a_w for the fungal growth was 0.8 on both coffee beans and rice grains, while a_w of 0.70 caused complete inhibition for the growth and aflatoxin B₁ production. H₂O₂ is a potent inhibitor for growth ofA. parasiticus and its productivity of toxins. NaHCO₃ and C₆H₅COONa converted aflatoxin B₁ to water-soluble form which returned to aflatoxin B₁ by acidity. Black pepper, ciliated heath, cuminum and curcuma were the most inhibitory spices on toxin production. Glutathione, quinine, EDTA, sodium azide, indole acetic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid, phenol and catechol were inhibitory for both growth, as well as, aflatoxin B₁ production. Stearic acid supported the fungal growth and decreased the productivity of AFB₁ gradually. Lauric acid is the most suppressive fatty acid for both fungal growth and aflatoxin production, but oleic acid was the most potent supporter. Vitamin A supported the growth but inhibited aflatoxin B₁ production. Vitamins C and D₂ were also repressive particularly for aflatoxin production The present study included studying the activities of some enzymes in relation to aflatoxin production during 20-days ofA. parasiticus age in 2-days intervals. Glycolytic enzymes and pyruvate-generating enzymes seems to be linked with aflatoxin B₁ production. Also, pentose-phosphate pathway enzymes may provide NADPH for aflatoxin B₁ synthesis. The decreased activities of TCA cycle enzymes particularly from 4th day of growth up to 10th day were associated with the increase of aflatoxin B₁ production. All the tested enzymes as well as aflatoxin B₁ production were inhibited by either catechol or phenol.     

An enzyme immunoassay system for aflatoxin B1

Indirect enzyme immunoassay based on immobilized conjugate of aflatoxin B₁ carboxymethyloxime with bovine serum albumin and polyclonal rabbit antibodies allows determining aflatoxin B₁ with a low relative cross-reactivity against aflatoxin B₂, G₁, G₂, M₁ B_2a, and G_2a and sterigmatocystin (15.5, 15.5, 1.7, 1.0, 0.03, 0.03 and 0.01%, respectively) with a sensitivity of 0.04 ng per well or 4.0 ng per ml organic solvent.     

Solvent-dependent transformation of aflatoxin B<Subscript>1</Subscript> in soil

To date, all studies of aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) transformation in soil or in purified mineral systems have identified aflatoxins B₂ (AFB₂) and G₂ (AFG₂) as the primary transformation products. However, identification in these studies was made using thin layer chromatography which has relatively low resolution, and these studies did not identify a viable mechanism by which such transformations would occur. Further, the use of methanol as the solvent delivery vehicle in these studies may have contributed to formation of artifactual transformation products. In this study, we investigated the role of the solvent vehicle in the transformation of AFB₁ in soil. To do this, we spiked soils with AFB₁ dissolved in water (93:7, water/methanol) or methanol and used HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS to identify the transformation products. Contrasting previous published reports, we did not detect AFB₂ or AFG₂. In an aqueous-soil environment, we identified aflatoxin B_2a (AFB_2a) as the single major transformation product. We propose that AFB_2a is formed from hydrolysis of AFB₁ with the soil acting as an acid catalyst. Alternatively, when methanol was used, we identified methoxy aflatoxin species likely formed via acid-catalyzed addition of methanol to AFB₁. These results suggest that where soil moisture is adequate, AFB₁ is hydrolyzed to AFB_2a and that reactive organic solvents should be avoided when replicating natural conditions to study the fate of AFB₁ in soil.     

In situ absorption of aflatoxins in rat small intestine

To evaluate the rate at which the four main aflatoxins (aflatoxins B₁, B₂, G₁ and G₂) are able to cross the luminal membrane of the rat small intestine, a study about intestinal absorption kinetics of these mycotoxins has been made. In situ results obtained showed that the absorption of aflatoxins in rat small intestine is a very fast process that follows first-order kinetics, with an absorption rate constant (k _a ) of 5.84±0.05 (aflatoxin B₁), 4.06±0.09 (aflatoxin B₂), 2.09±0.03 (aflatoxin G₁) and 1.58±0.04 (aflatoxin G₂) h^–1, respectively.     

The production of aflatoxin B1 or G1 by Aspergillus parasiticus at various combinations of temperature and water activity is related to the ratio of aflS to aflR expression

The influence of varying combinations of water activity (a_w) and temperature on growth, aflatoxin biosynthesis and aflR/aflS expression of Aspergillus parasiticus was analysed in the ranges 17–42°C and 0.90–0.99 a_w. Optimum growth was at 35°C. At each temperature studied, growth increased from 0.90 to 0.99 a_w. Temperatures of 17 and 42°C only supported marginal growth. The external conditions had a differential effect on aflatoxin B₁ or G₁ biosynthesis. The temperature optima of aflatoxin B₁ and G₁ were not at the temperature which supported optimal growth (35°C) but either below (aflatoxin G₁, 20–30°C) or above (aflatoxin B₁, 37°C). Interestingly, the expression of the two regulatory genes aflR and aflS showed an expression profile which corresponded to the biosynthesis profile of either B₁ (aflR) or G₁ (aflS). The ratios of the expression data between aflS:aflR were calculated. High ratios at a range between 17 and 30°C corresponded with the production profile of aflatoxin G₁ biosynthesis. A low ratio was observed at >30°C, which was related to aflatoxin B₁ biosynthesis. The results revealed that the temperature was the key parameter for aflatoxin B₁, whereas it was water activity for G₁ biosynthesis. These differences in regulation may be attributed to variable conditions of the ecological niche in which these species occur.     

Failure of plant tissues to metabolize aflatoxin B1?

After exposure of peas and wheat kernels to aflatoxin B₁ solutions the following aflatoxins could not be detected in seed extracts: aflatoxins M₁, B_2a, Q₁, aflatoxicol and tetrahydrodeoxyaflatoxin B₁.     

On the binding of aflatoxin B 1 and its metabolites to hepatic microsomes

The metabolism of aflatoxin B₁ was studied using the cytochrome P450-dependent mixed function oxidase system of rat liver microsomes. An aflatoxin metabolite produced in the presence of microsomes and NADPH and not produced in the presence of SKF-525A seems to become covalently bound to microsomes. The bound metabolite is observed as a spectral peak at 412 nm by means of difference spectroscopy. This metabolite appears to be related to either aflatoxin B_2a or its precursor.     

2,3-Dihydro-2,3-dihydroxy-aflatoxin B1: an acid hydrolysis product of an RNA-aflatoxin B1 adduct formed by hamster and rat liver microsomes in vitro

Fortified hamster and rat liver microsomes bind the carcinogen aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁), but not its much less carcinogenic 2,3-dihydro derivative (aflatoxin B₂), to RNA in vitro. Mild acid hydrolysis of the RNA-AFB₁ adduct yields a product indistinguishable from synthetic 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxy-AFB₁ in (a) its UV absorption spectra in neutral and alkaline solution, (b) its thin layer chromatography in several solvent systems, and (c) the mass spectra of the acetonide and diacetyl derivatives. AFB₁-2,3-oxide is the probable reactive precursor of the RNA-AFB₁ adduct. This epoxide merits consideration as a candidate ultimate carcinogenic metabolite of AFB₁.     

The analysis of aflatoxins by high-performance liquid chromatography.

The potential of high-performance liquid chromatography as a technique for separating aflatoxins B₁ B₂, G₁, G₂, B_2a, Q₁, M₁, P₁, aflatoxicol, and a degradation product of aflatoxin B₁, 2,3-dihydrodiol, has been assessed. A microparticulate silica adsorption column used with a 1:1 chloroform -dichloromethane eluant provided good resolution of aflatoxins B₁, B₂, G₁, and G₂ but the addition of 1% propan-2-ol was necessary for the elution of aflatoxins M₁ and Q₁. By selecting appropriate solvent mixtures, good resolution of all of the aflatoxins studied was obtained using columns containing an octadecyl (C₁₈) reversed-phase bonded to a microparticulate support. Details are given for resolving: (1) aflatoxins B₁, B₂, G₁, and G₂ using a 5% tetrahydrofuran-15% dimethylformamide in water eluant and (2) aflatoxins B₁ B_2a, Q₁ M₁ P₁ aflatoxicol, and a product of aflatoxin B₁ 2,3-dihydrodiol treated with Tris-buffer, using either 15% dimethylformamide in water or 10% tetrahydrofuran in water as eluant.     

Regional Differences in Production of Aflatoxin B1 and Cyclopiazonic Acid by Soil Isolates of Aspergillus flavus along a Transect within the United States

Soil isolates of Aspergillus flavus from a transect extending from eastern New Mexico through Georgia to eastern Virginia were examined for production of aflatoxin B₁ and cyclopiazonic acid in a liquid medium. Peanut fields from major peanut-growing regions (western Texas; central Texas; Georgia and Alabama; and Virginia and North Carolina) were sampled, and fields with other crops were sampled in regions where peanuts are not commonly grown. The A. flavus isolates were identified as members of either the L strain (n = 774), which produces sclerotia that are >400 μm in diameter, or the S strain (n = 309), which produces numerous small sclerotia that are <400 μm in diameter. The S-strain isolates generally produced high levels of aflatoxin B₁, whereas the L-strain isolates were more variable in aflatoxin production; variation in cyclopiazonic acid production also was greater in the L strain than in the S strain. There was a positive correlation between aflatoxin B₁ production and cyclopiazonic acid production in both strains, although 12% of the L-strain isolates produced only cyclopiazonic acid. Significant differences in production of aflatoxin B₁ and cyclopiazonic acid by the L-strain isolates were detected among regions. In the western half of Texas and the peanut-growing region of Georgia and Alabama, 62 to 94% of the isolates produced >10 μg of aflatoxin B₁ per ml. The percentages of isolates producing >10 μg of aflatoxin B₁ per ml ranged from 0 to 52% in the remaining regions of the transect; other isolates were often nonaflatoxigenic. A total of 53 of the 126 L-strain isolates that did not produce aflatoxin B₁ or cyclopiazonic acid were placed in 17 vegetative compatibility groups. Several of these groups contained isolates from widely separated regions of the transect.     

Interaction of aflatoxin B1 with electron-donating organic molecules,including aromatic amino acids

The interaction of the carcinogenic mycotoxin, aflatoxin B₁, with some electrondonating organic compounds including aromatic hydrocarbons, dimethylaniline, and aromatic amino acids, was studied. Spectrophotometric analysis of aflatoxin B₁ revealed that hypochromicity in the absorption around 360 nm and hyperchromicity around 385 nm were induced by dimethylaniline, hexamethylbenzene, tryptophan, and imidazole. A similar shifting of aflatoxin B₁ absorption was observed in benzene, toluene, and xylene in the presence of ZnCl₂. The interaction of aflatoxin B₁ with polystyrene was observed in a biphasic system. The association constants of aflatoxin B₁: DMA⁴ (1:1) and of aflatoxin B₁: tryptophan (1:1) were found to be 0.64 and 22.6 liters per mole, respectively. The results suggest that charge-transfer interaction occurs between aflatoxin B₁ and these π-electron donors. Since the spectral changes on aflatoxin B₁ absorption induced by these π-electron donors are similar to those induced by nucleic acids and proteins, it is postulated that charge-transfer interaction also occurs between aflatoxin B₁ and these macromolecules. The role of such interaction in the biological activity of aflatoxin B₁ is discussed.     

Carcinogen-Nucleic Acid Interactions: Equilibrium Binding Studies of Aflatoxins B1 and B2 with DNA and the Oligodeoxynucleotide d(ATGCAT)2

Abstract

Equilibrium binding is believed to play an important role in directing the subsequent covalent attachment of many carcinogens to DNA. We have utilized UV spectroscopy to examine the non-covalent interactions of aflatoxin B₁ and B₂ with calf thymus DNA, poly(dAdT):poly(dAdT), and poly(dGdC):poly(dGdC), and have utilized NMR spectroscopy to examine non-covalent interactions of aflatoxin B₂ with the oligodeoxynucleotide d(ATGCAT)₂. UV-VIS binding isotherms suggest a greater binding affinity for calf thymus DNA and poly(dAdT):poly(dAdT) than for poly(dGdC):poly(dGdC). Scatchard analysis of aflatoxin B₁ binding to calf thymus DNA in 0.1 M NaCl buffer indicates that binding of the carcinogen at levels of bound aflatoxin ? 1 carcinogen per 200 base pairs occurs with positive cooperativity. The cooperative binding effect is dependent on the ionic strength of the medium; when the NaCl concentration is reduced to 0.01 M, positive cooperativity is observed at carcinogen levels ? 1 carcinogen per 500 base pairs. The Scatchard data may be fit using a “two-site” binding model [L.S. Rosenberg, M J. Carvlin, and T.R. Krugh, Biochemistry 25, 1002–1008 (1986)]. This model assumes two independent sets of binding sites on the DNA lattice, one a high affinity site which binds the carcinogen with positive cooperativity, the second consisting of lower affinity binding sites to which non-specific binding occurs. NMR analysis of aflatoxin B₂ binding to d(ATGCAT)₂ indicates that the aflatoxin B₂/oligodeoxynucleotide complex is in fast exchange on the NMR time scale. Upfield chemical shifts of 0.1–0.5 ppm are observed for the aflatoxin B₂ 4-OCH₃, H5, and H6a protons. Much smaller chemical shift changes ? 0.06 ppm) are observed for the oligodeoxynucleotide protons. The greatest effect for the oligodeoxynucleotide protons is observed for the adenine H2 protons, located in the minor groove. Nonselective T₁ experiments demonstrate a 15–25 % decrease in the relaxation time for the adenine H2 protons when aflatoxin B₂ is added to the solution. This result suggests that aflatoxin B₂ protons in the bound state may be in close proximity to these protons, providing a source of dipolar relaxation. Further experiments are in progress to probe the nature of the aflatoxin B₁ and B₂ complexes with polymeric DNA and oligodeoxynucleotides, and to establish the relationship between the non-covalent DNA-carcinogen complexes observed in these experiments, and covalent aflatoxin B₁,-guanine N7 DNA adducts.     

Rapid On-Site Sensing Aflatoxin B1 in Food and Feed via a Chromatographic Time-Resolved Fluoroimmunoassay

Aflatoxin B₁ poses grave threats to food and feed safety due to its strong carcinogenesis and toxicity, thus requiring ultrasensitive rapid on-site determination. Herein, a portable immunosensor based on chromatographic time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay was developed for sensitive and on-site determination of aflatoxin B₁ in food and feed samples. Chromatographic time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay offered a magnified positive signal and low signal-to-noise ratio in time-resolved mode due to the absence of noise interference caused by excitation light sources. Compared with the immunosensing performance in previous studies, this platform demonstrated a wider dynamic range of 0.2-60 μg/kg, lower limit of detection from 0.06 to 0.12 µg/kg, and considerable recovery from 80.5% to 116.7% for different food and feed sample matrices. It was found to be little cross-reactivity with other aflatoxins (B₂, G₁, G₂, and M₁). In the case of determination of aflatoxin B₁ in peanuts, corn, soy sauce, vegetable oil, and mouse feed, excellent agreement was found when compared with aflatoxin B₁ determination via the conversational high-performance liquid chromatography method. The chromatographic time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay affords a powerful alternative for rapid on-site determination of aflatoxin B₁ and holds a promise for food safety in consideration of practical food safety and environmental monitoring.     

Methodische Untersuchungen zur stoffwechselorientierten Lysinbedarfsbestimmung an Broilerküken

Broiler chicks were divided into five groups and fed starter mash from the first day after hatching. The first group feed (control) was mycotoxin free, whereas the mycotoxins sterigmatocystin (350 ppb) and aflatoxin B, (100 ppb) were added to the second group diet, patulin (100 ppb) and aflatoxin B, (100 ppb) to the third group feed, penicillic acid (850 ppb) and aflatoxin B, (100 ppb) to the fourth group, and aflatoxins B_2a (0.9 ppb) + G_2α (25 ppb) + M₁ (0.9 ppb) + M₂ (1 ppb) to the fifth group. This contaminated feeding lasted for four weeks followed by another four weeks as recovery period during which all groups fed finishing mash without mycotoxins.

At the end of the experiment, the chickens of groups two, three, four and five were significantly lower in body weight and feed conversion and reflected higher mortality rates than those of the control group.     

The mechanism of action of aflatoxin B1 on protein synthesis: observations on malignant viral transformed and untransformed cells in culture

(1) Aflatoxin B₁ was tested against protein and nucleic acid synthesis in a number of cell lines in culture. (2) A detailed investigation was made in CV-1 cells to determine the mechanism whereby aflatoxin B₁ inhibits protein synthesis. (3) Inhibition of protein synthesis by aflatoxin B₁ was not secondary to other changes in the cell but was due to a direct action of the toxin on the polysomes. The possible site of its interaction is discussed.     

Reduction of aflatoxin B1 levels by sheep saliva

This study determined the decrease of aflatoxin B₁ by sheep saliva at concentrations of 150 and 300 μg aflatoxin B-₁/L saliva. Analyses for aflatoxins B₁, M₁, and aflatoxicol (R₀) were performed after 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 hours of incubation. Aflatoxin M₁ and R₀ were not detected and only residues of aflatoxin B₁ were found. 4 to 13% of aflatoxin B₁ were decomposed by sheep’s saliva within 2 hrs and 33 to 43% of aflatoxin B₁ after 24 hrs. Decomposition was affected by the aflatoxin concentration. Decrease of aflatoxin B₁ at 2, 4, 6 hrs was nearly three times higher at the low concentration (150 ppb) compared to the high concentration (300 ppb). After 48 hrs incubation more than 80% of the initial aflatoxin B₁ had been decomposed by the saliva.     

Aflatoxin B1-2,3-oxide: evidence for its formation in rat liver in vivo and by human liver microsomes in vitro

Injection of [³H]aflatoxin B₁ into rats yielded covalently bound derivatives in hepatic DNA, rRNA, and protein. Mild acid hydrolysis of the DNA and rRNA adducts formed a derivative indistinguishable from 2,3-dihydro-2,3-dihydroxy-aflatoxin B₁. The data indicate that approximately 60% of the nucleic acid adducts were derived from reactions $\text{in vivo}$ with aflatoxin B₁-2,3-oxide. Acid hydrolysis of rRNA-[³Haflatoxin B₁ adduct formed by human liver microsomes $\text{in vitro}$ also liberated the dihydrodiol in significant amount. The 2,3-oxide of aflatoxin B₁ is a probable ultimate carcinogenic metabolite.