The Central Region of the Drosophila Co-repressor Groucho as a Regulatory Hub

Groucho (Gro) is a Drosophila co-repressor that regulates the expression of a large number of genes, many of which are involved in developmental control. Previous studies have shown that its central region is essential for function even though its three domains are poorly conserved and intrinsically disordered. Using these disordered domains as affinity reagents, we have now identified multiple embryonic Gro-interacting proteins. The interactors include protein complexes involved in chromosome organization, mRNA processing, and signaling. Further investigation of the interacting proteins using a reporter assay showed that many of them modulate Gro-mediated repression either positively or negatively. The positive regulators include components of the spliceosomal subcomplex U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1 snRNP). A co-immunoprecipitation experiment confirms this finding and suggests that a sizable fraction of nuclear U1 snRNP is associated with Gro. The use of RNA-seq to analyze the gene expression profile of cells subjected to knockdown of Gro or snRNP-U1-C (a component of U1 snRNP) showed a significant overlap between genes regulated by these two factors. Furthermore, comparison of our RNA-seq data with Gro and RNA polymerase II ChIP data led to a number of insights, including the finding that Gro-repressed genes are enriched for promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II. We conclude that the Gro central domains mediate multiple interactions required for repression, thus functioning as a regulatory hub. Furthermore, interactions with the spliceosome may contribute to repression by Gro.     

Groucho oligomerization is required for repression in vivo

Drosophila Groucho (Gro) is a member of a family of metazoan corepressors with widespread roles in development. Previous studies indicated that a conserved domain in Gro, termed the Q domain, was required for repression in cultured cells and mediated homotetramerization. Evidence presented here suggests that the Q domain contains two coiled-coil motifs required for oligomerization and repression in vivo. Mutagenesis of the putative hydrophobic faces of these motifs, but not of the hydrophilic faces, prevents the formation of both tetramers and higher order oligomers. Mutagenesis of the hydrophobic faces of both coiled-coil motifs in the context of a Gal4-Gro fusion protein prevents repression of a Gal4-responsive reporter in S2 cells, while mutagenesis of a single motif weakens repression. The finding that the repression directed by the single mutants depends on endogenous wild-type Gro further supports the idea that oligomerization plays a role in repression. Overexpression in the fly of forms of Gro able to oligomerize, but not of a form of Gro unable to oligomerize, results in developmental defects and ectopic repression of Gro target genes in the wing disk. Although the function of several corepressors is suspected to involve oligomerization, these studies represent one of the first direct links between corepressor oligomerization and repression in vivo.     

Identification of the catalytic and DNA-binding region of the human immunodeficiency virus type I integrase protein.

The integrase (IN) protein of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is required for specific cleavage of the viral DNA termini, and subsequent integration of the viral DNA into target DNA. To identify the various domains of the IN protein we generated a series of IN deletion mutants as fusions to maltose-binding protein (MBP). The deletion mutants were tested for their ability to bind DNA, to mediate site-specific cleavage of the viral DNA ends, and to carry out integration and disintegration reactions. We found that the DNA-binding region resides between amino acids 200 and 270 of the 288-residues HIV-1 IN protein. The catalytic domain of the protein was mapped between amino acids 50 and 194. For the specific activities of IN, cleavage of the viral DNA and integration, both the DNA-binding domain and the conserved amino-terminal region of IN are required. These regions are dispensable however, for disintegration activity.     

Structure-function analysis of tissue-type plasminogen activator by linker-insertion, point and deletion mutagenesis

We undertook a structure--function analysis of human tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) using linker-scanning and deletion mutagenesis. Synthetic oligonucleotide linkers were introduced into the tPA cDNA at pre-existing restriction enzyme sites. This generated a series of tPA variants which contained small primary sequence alterations consisting of point mutations, deletions or insertions. The majority of the linker-insertion variants demonstrate a significant reduction in amidolytic and fibrinolytic activity in comparison to wild-type tPA. The exceptions are the variants with linker-inserts placed at the BglII(115) and StyI(277) sites of the tPA cDNA (4SLEG5 and 57LEA58 respectively), which encode insertions at the boundaries of the finger domain. The variants with linker-inserts in the light chain (protease domain) of tPA are the lowest in enzymatic activity. Particularly sensitive to mutation are highly conserved amino acids. Heavy chain deletion variants were constructed from point mutants at the domain boundaries of tPA. Deletion of the kringle domains lowers the fibrinolytic activity to a greater extent than deletion of the finger or growth factor domains. We conclude that alterations in any domain of the tPA molecule, and particularly in the highly conserved residues within these domains, can affect fibrinolytic activity.     

Identical amino acid substitutions in the repression domain of auxin/indole-3-acetic acid proteins have contrasting effects on auxin signaling

Auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA) proteins function as repressors of auxin response gene expression when auxin concentrations in a cell are low. At elevated auxin concentrations, these repressors are destroyed via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, resulting in derepression/activation of auxin response genes. Most Aux/IAA repressors contain four conserved domains, with one of these being an active, portable repression domain (domain I) and a second being an auxin-dependent instability domain (domain II). Here, we have analyzed the effects of amino acid substitutions in the repression domain of selected Aux/IAA proteins. We show that stabilized versions of Aux/IAA proteins with amino acid substitutions in domain I display contrasting phenotypes when expressed in transformed Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants. An alanine-for-leucine substitution in the LxLxL (where L is leucine and x is another amino acid) repression domain of IAA3, IAA6, or IAA19 confers enhanced auxin response gene expression and "high-auxin" phenotypes when expressed from the 35S or IAA19 promoter (as tested with IAA19) in transformed Arabidopsis plants. In marked contrast, a single alanine-for-leucine substitution in domain I of IAA12 or IAA17 confers repression of auxin response genes and "low-auxin" phenotypes. These results point to intrinsic differences in the repression domain(s) of IAA proteins and suggest that some IAA proteins have stronger or more complex repression domains than others.     

Identification of a membrane fusion domain and an oligomerization domain in the baculovirus GP64 envelope fusion protein.

The baculovirus GP64 envelope fusion protein (GP64 EFP) is the major envelope glycoprotein of the budded virion and has been shown to mediate acid-triggered membrane fusion both in virions and when expressed alone in transfected cells. Using site-directed mutagenesis and functional assays for oligomerization, transport, and membrane fusion, we localized two functional domains of GP64 EFP. To identify a fusion domain in the GP64 EFP of the Orgyia pseudotsugata multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (OpMNPV), we examined two hydrophobic regions in the GP64 EFP ectodomain. Hydrophobic region I (amino acids 223 to 228) is a cluster of 6 hydrophobic amino acids exhibiting the highest local hydrophobicity in the ectodomain. Hydrophobic region II (amino acids 330 to 338) lies within a conserved region of GP64 EFP that contains a heptad repeat of leucine residues and is predicted to form an amphipathic alpha-helix. In region I, nonconservative amino acid substitutions at Leu-226 and Leu-227 (at the center of the hydrophobic cluster) completely abolished fusion activity but did not prevent GP64 EFP oligomerization or surface localization. To confirm the role of region I in membrane fusion activity, we used a synthetic 21-amino-acid peptide to generate polyclonal antibodies against region I and demonstrated that antipeptide antibodies were capable of both neutralizing membrane fusion activity and reducing infectivity of the virus. In hydrophobic region II, mutations were designed to disrupt several structural characteristics: a heptad repeat of leucine, a predicted alpha-helix, or the local hydrophobicity along one face of the helix. Single alanine substitutions for heptad leucines did not prevent oligomerization, transport, or fusion activity. However, multiple alanine substitutions or proline (helix-destabilizing) substitutions disrupted both oligomerization and transport of GP64 EFP. In addition, a deletion that removed region II and the predicted alpha-helix was defective for oligomerization, whereas a larger deletion that retained region II and the predicted helix was oligomerized. These results indicate that region II is required for oligomerization and transport and suggest that the predicted helical structure of this region may be important for this function. Thus, by using mutagenesis, functional assays, and antibody inhibition, two functional domains were localized within the baculovirus GP64 EFP: a fusion domain located at amino acids 223 to 228 and an oligomerization domain located at amino acids 327 to 335 within a predicted amphipathic alpha-helix.     

Nanos1 functions as a translational repressor in the Xenopus germline

Nanos family members have been shown to act as translational repressors in the Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans germline, but direct evidence is missing for a similar function in vertebrates. Using a tethered function assay, we show that Xenopus Nanos1 is a translational repressor and that association with the RNA is required for this repression. We identified a 14 amino acid region within the N-terminal domain of Nanos1 that is conserved in organisms as diverse as sponge and Human. The region is found in all vertebrates but notably lacking in Drosophila and C. elegans. Deletion and substitution analysis revealed that this conserved region was required for Nanos1 repressive activity. Consistent with this observation, deletion of this region was sufficient to prevent abnormal development that results from ectopic expression of Nanos1 in oocytes. Although Nanos1 can repress capped and polyadenylated RNAs, Nanos1 mediated repression did not require the targeted RNA to have a cap or to be polyadenylated. These results suggest that Nanos1 is capable of repressing translation by several different mechanisms. We found that Nanos1, like Drosophila Nanos, associates with cyclin B1 RNA in vivo indicating that some Nanos targets may be evolutionarily conserved. Nanos1 protein was detected and thus available to repress mRNAs while PGCs were in the endoderm, but was not observed in PGCs after this stage.