Transmission disequilibrium test with discordant sib pairs when parents are available

The transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) has been employed to map disease susceptibility loci (DSL), while being immune to the problem of population admixture. The customary TDT test (TDT(D)) was developed for affected child(ren) and their parents and was most often applied to case-parent trios. Recently, the TDT has been extended to the situations when (1) parents are not available but affected and nonaffected sibs from each family are available, (2) unrelated control-parent trios are available for combined analyses with case-parent trios (TDT(DC)), and (3) large pedigrees. For many diseases, affected children in the case-parent trios enlisted into the TDT(D) have unaffected sibs who can be recruited. We present an extension of the TDT by effectively incorporating one unaffected sib of each of the affected children in the case-parent trios into a single analysis (TDT(DS), where DS denotes discordant sib pairs). We have developed a general analytical method for computing the statistical power of the TDT(DS) under any genetic model, the accuracy of which is validated by computer simulations. We compare the power of the TDT(D), TDT(DC), and TDT(DS) under a range of parameter space and genetic models. We find that the TDT(DS) is generally more powerful than the TDT(DC) and TDT(D), particularly when the disease is prevalent (>30%) in the population. The relative power of the TDT(D) and the TDT(DS) largely depends upon the allele frequencies and genetic effects at the DSL, whereas the recombination rate, the degree of linkage disequilibrium, and the marker allele frequencies have little effect. Importantly, the TDT(DS) not only may be more powerful, it also has the advantage of being able to test for segregation distortion that may yield false linkage/association in the TDT(D).     

Impact of non-ignorable missingness on genetic tests of linkage and/or association using case-parent trios

The transmission/disequilibrium test was introduced to test for linkage disequilibrium between a marker and a putative disease locus using case-parent trios. However, parental genotypes may be incomplete in such a study. When parental information is non-randomly missing, due, for example, to death from the disease under study, the impact on type I error and power under dominant and recessive disease models has been reported. In this paper, we examine non-ignorable missingness by assigning missing values to the genotypes of affected parents. We used unrelated case-parent trios in the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 simulated data for the Danacaa population. Our computer simulations revealed that the type I error of these tests using incomplete trios was not inflated over the nominal level under either recessive or dominant disease models. However, the power of these tests appears to be inflated over the complete information case due to an excess of heterozygous parents in dyads.     

一种有效的复杂疾病基因定位的检测法

连锁不平衡（LD）应用于某些复杂疾病基因的定位,近年来发展了许多LD定位方法,除TDT外,大多数LD定位方法须先假定无人群混和,人群混合可增大在疾病基因定位时犯Ⅰ类错误的机率,产生无效结果。此方法利用LD来检测标记位点和疾病敏感位点（DSL）的连锁（有连锁不平衡）相关（有连锁）。分析时采用不相关样本,已知其父母基因型和至少父母之一为杂合子,再将随机样本依基因型不同分类,然后对来自不同类的数据应用有力的统计方法进行单独和联合分析。此LD定位法不仅适用于患病和正常个体,而且有效消除据父母基因分类的样本定位时人群混合的影响,分析结果和模拟结果也表明此方法解决了在检测标记位点和疾病敏感位点之间的连锁和相关时人群混和的问题,但与TDT比,此法在检测的位点为DSL时丙能有效和充分地利用矫正数据,检测位点不是DSL时,此法和TDT法可相互补充更有效地检测连锁的DSL。     

Transmission/Disequilibrium Tests Incorporating Unaffected Offspring

We propose a new method for family-based tests of association and linkage called transmission/disequilibrium tests incorporating unaffected offspring (TDTU). This new approach, constructed based on transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits (QTDT), provides a natural extension of the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) to utilize transmission information from heterozygous parents to their unaffected offspring as well as the affected offspring from ascertained nuclear families. TDTU can be used in various study designs and can accommodate all types of independent nuclear families with at least one affected offspring. When the study sample contains only case-parent trios, the TDTU is equivalent to TDT. Informative-transmission disequilibrium test (i-TDT) and generalized disequilibrium test(GDT) are another two methods that can use information of both unaffected offspring and affected offspring. In contract to i-TDT and GDT, the test statistic of TDTU is simpler and more explicit, and can be implemented more easily. Through computer simulations, we demonstrate that power of the TDTU is slightly higher compared to i-TDT and GDT. All the three methods are more powerful than method that uses affected offspring only, suggesting that unaffected siblings also provide information about linkage and association.     

Maternal association and influence of DHFR 19 bp deletion variant predisposes foetus to anencephaly susceptibility: a family-based triad study

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have not used family-based methods to evaluate maternal-paternal genetic effects of the folate metabolizing enzyme, dihydro folate reductase (DHFR) essential during embryogenesis. Present study focuses on evaluating the association and influence of parental genetic effects of DHFR 19?bp deletion in the development of foetal neural tube defects (NTDs) using family-based triad approach.

Materials and methods: The study population (n?=?924) including 124 NTD case-parent trios (n?=?124?×?3?=?372) and 184 healthy control-parent trios (n?=?184?×?3?=?552) from Telangana, India, was genotyped for DHFR 19?bp deletion. Statistical analysis was used by SPSS and parent-of-origin effects (POE).

Results: Foetuses with deletion genotype (DD) were at risk of developing anencephaly (OR =?3.26, p?=?0.020). Among parents, increased maternal risk of having an anencephaly foetus (OR =?2.66, p?=?0.028) was observed in mothers with DD genotype. In addition, POE analysis also demonstrated higher risk of maternal transmission of the deletion allele to anencephaly foetus compared with paternal transmission (OR =?6.00, p?=?0.016). Interestingly, maternal-paternal-offspring genotype incompatibility revealed maternal deletion genotype (DD) in association with paternal heterozygous deletion genotype (WD) significantly increased risk for NTDs (OR =?5.29, p?=?0.013).

Conclusions: This study, using family-based case-parent and control-parent triad approach, is the first to report influence of maternal transmission of DHFR 19?bp deletion in the development of anencephaly in the foetus.     

A Transmission/Disequilibrium Test That Allows for Genotyping Errors in the Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Data

The present study assesses the effects of genotyping errors on the type I error rate of a particular transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT(std)), which assumes that data are errorless, and introduces a new transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT(ae)) that allows for random genotyping errors. We evaluate the type I error rate and power of the TDT(ae) under a variety of simulations and perform a power comparison between the TDT(std) and the TDT(ae), for errorless data. Both the TDT(std) and the TDT(ae) statistics are computed as two times a log-likelihood difference, and both are asymptotically distributed as chi(2) with 1 df. Genotype data for trios are simulated under a null hypothesis and under an alternative (power) hypothesis. For each simulation, errors are introduced randomly via a computer algorithm with different probabilities (called "allelic error rates"). The TDT(std) statistic is computed on all trios that show Mendelian consistency, whereas the TDT(ae) statistic is computed on all trios. The results indicate that TDT(std) shows a significant increase in type I error when applied to data in which inconsistent trios are removed. This type I error increases both with an increase in sample size and with an increase in the allelic error rates. TDT(ae) always maintains correct type I error rates for the simulations considered. Factors affecting the power of the TDT(ae) are discussed. Finally, the power of TDT(std) is at least that of TDT(ae) for simulations with errorless data. Because data are rarely error free, we recommend that researchers use methods, such as the TDT(ae), that allow for errors in genotype data.     

A Discordant-Sibship Test for Disequilibrium and Linkage: No Need for Parental Data

The sibship disequilibrium test (SDT) is designed to detect both linkage in the presence of association and association in the presence of linkage (linkage disequilibrium). The test does not require parental data but requires discordant sibships with at least one affected and one unaffected sibling. The SDT has many desirable properties: it uses all the siblings in the sibship; it remains valid if there are misclassifications of the affectation status; it does not detect spurious associations due to population stratification; asymptotically it has a chi2 distribution under the null hypothesis; and exact P values can be easily computed for a biallelic marker. We show how to extend the SDT to markers with multiple alleles and how to combine families with parents and data from discordant sibships. We discuss the power of the test by presenting sample-size calculations involving a complex disease model, and we present formulas for the asymptotic relative efficiency (which is approximately the ratio of sample sizes) between SDT and the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for special family structures. For sib pairs, we compare the SDT to a test proposed both by Curtis and, independently, by Spielman and Ewens. We show that, for discordant sib pairs, the SDT has good power for testing linkage disequilibrium relative both to Curtis''s tests and to the TDT using trios comprising an affected sib and its parents. With additional sibs, we show that the SDT can be more powerful than the TDT for testing linkage disequilibrium, especially for disease prevalence >.3.     

Increased Power for Detection of Parent-of-Origin Effects via the Use of Haplotype Estimation

Parent-of-origin (or imprinting) effects relate to the situation in which traits are influenced by the allele inherited from only one parent and the allele from the other parent has little or no effect. Given SNP genotype data from case-parent trios, the parent of origin of each allele in the offspring can often be deduced unambiguously; however, this is not true when all three individuals are heterozygous. Most existing methods for investigating parent-of-origin effects operate on a SNP-by-SNP basis and either perform some sort of averaging over the possible parental transmissions or else discard ambiguous trios. If the correct parent of origin at a SNP could be determined, this would provide extra information and increase the power for detecting the effects of imprinting. We propose making use of the surrounding SNP information, via haplotype estimation, to improve estimation of parent of origin at a test SNP for case-parent trios, case-mother duos, and case-father duos. This extra information is then used in a multinomial modeling approach for estimating parent-of-origin effects at the test SNP. We show through computer simulations that our approach has increased power over previous approaches, particularly when the data consist only of duos. We apply our method to two real datasets and find a decrease in significance of p values in genomic regions previously thought to possibly harbor imprinting effects, thus weakening the evidence that such effects actually exist in these regions, although some regions retain evidence of significant effects.     

Linkage disequilibrium between an allele at the dopamine D4 receptor locus and Tourette syndrome, by the transmission-disequilibrium test.

Dopaminergic abnormalities are implicated in the pathogenesis of Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic multiple tics. We used the transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) method to test for linkage disequilibrium between a specific allele (the seven-repeat allele (DRD4*7R) of the exon 3 VNTR polymorphic site) at the D4 dopamine receptor locus (DRD4) and expression of chronic multiple tics and TS. This particular allele had been shown in functional studies to have different binding properties compared with the other common alleles in this DRD4 polymorphic system. We studied 64 family trios (consisting of an affected person and two parents, at least one heterozygous for DRD4*7R), including 12 nuclear family trios and 52 trios from four large TS kindreds. The DRD4*7R allele was transmitted significantly more frequently than expected (chi 2 TDT ranging from 8.47 [P < .004] to 10.80 [P = .001], depending on breadth of disease definition and inclusion or exclusion of inferred genotypes). Confirmation of this finding will depend on either replication in other samples or the identification of a transmitted functional mutation within this sample.     

An extension of the transmission disequilibrium test incorporating imprinting

The recombination rates in meioses of females and males are often different. Some genes that affect development and behavior in mammals are known to be imprinted, and >1% of all mammalian genes are believed to be imprinted. When the gene is imprinted and the recombination fractions are sex specific, the conventional transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) is shown to be still valid for testing for linkage. The power function of the TDT is derived, and the effect of the degree of imprinting on the power of the TDT is investigated. It is learned that imprinting has little effect on the power when the female and male recombination rates are equal. On the basis of case-parents trios, the transmissions from the heterozygous fathers/mothers to their affected children are separated as paternal and maternal, and two TDT-like statistics, TDT(p) and TDT(m), are consequently constructed. It is found that the TDT(p) possesses a higher power than the TDT for maternal imprinting genes, and the TDT(m) is more powerful than the TDT for paternal imprinting genes. On the basis of the parent-of-origin effects test statistic (POET), a novel statistic, TDT incorporating imprinting (TDTI) is proposed to test for linkage in the presence of linkage disequilibrium, which is shown to be more powerful than the TDT when parent-of-origin effects are significant but slightly less powerful than the TDT when parent-of-origin effects are negligible. The validity of the TDT and TDTI is assessed by simulation. The power approximation formulas for the TDT and TDTI are derived and the simulation results show that they are accurate. The simulation study on power comparison shows that the TDTI outperforms the TDT for imprinted genes. The improvement can be substantial in the case of complete paternal/maternal imprinting.     

Utilizing Population Controls in Rare-Variant Case-Parent Association Tests

There is great interest in detecting associations between human traits and rare genetic variation. To address the low power implicit in single-locus tests of rare genetic variants, many rare-variant association approaches attempt to accumulate information across a gene, often by taking linear combinations of single-locus contributions to a statistic. Using the right linear combination is key—an optimal test will up-weight true causal variants, down-weight neutral variants, and correctly assign the direction of effect for causal variants. Here, we propose a procedure that exploits data from population controls to estimate the linear combination to be used in an case-parent trio rare-variant association test. Specifically, we estimate the linear combination by comparing population control allele frequencies with allele frequencies in the parents of affected offspring. These estimates are then used to construct a rare-variant transmission disequilibrium test (rvTDT) in the case-parent data. Because the rvTDT is conditional on the parents’ data, using parental data in estimating the linear combination does not affect the validity or asymptotic distribution of the rvTDT. By using simulation, we show that our new population-control-based rvTDT can dramatically improve power over rvTDTs that do not use population control information across a wide variety of genetic architectures. It also remains valid under population stratification. We apply the approach to a cohort of epileptic encephalopathy (EE) trios and find that dominant (or additive) inherited rare variants are unlikely to play a substantial role within EE genes previously identified through de novo mutation studies.     

The effects of selected sampling on the transmission disequilibrium test of a quantitative trait locus

We investigate how sampling of parents or children based on their extreme phenotypic values selected from clinical databases would affect the power of identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) by a transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). We consider three selective sampling schemes based on the selection of phenotypic values of parents or children in nuclear families: (1) two children, one of extreme value, the other random; (2) two children extremely discordant; (3) one parent of extreme value. Other family members not specified will be recruited randomly with regard to phenotypic values. Our study shows that the second sampling scheme can always enhance the power for QTL identification, sometimes dramatically so. The increase in the statistical power of the TDT is particularly dramatic when h2 at the QTL under test is small or intermediate (e.g. 0.05 or 0.10). For the other two sampling schemes, under dominant effects at the QTL, the power is always increased relative to random sampling; however, under recessive or additive genetic effects, the power gain is generally minor or even decreased a little sometimes. Allele frequencies at the QTL and the selection stringency are important for determining the effect of selective sampling on the power of QTL identification. Our study is useful as a practical guideline on how to perform the TDT efficiently in practice by taking advantage of the extensive databases accumulated that are enriched with people of extreme phenotypic values.     

The power of genomic control

Although association analysis is a useful tool for uncovering the genetic underpinnings of complex traits, its utility is diminished by population substructure, which can produce spurious association between phenotype and genotype within population-based samples. Because family-based designs are robust against substructure, they have risen to the fore of association analysis. Yet, if population substructure could be ignored, this robustness can come at the price of power. Unfortunately it is rarely evident when population substructure can be ignored. Devlin and Roeder recently have proposed a method, termed "genomic control" (GC), which has the robustness of family-based designs even though it uses population-based data. GC uses the genome itself to determine appropriate corrections for population-based association tests. Using the GC method, we contrast the power of two study designs, family trios (i.e., father, mother, and affected progeny) versus case-control. For analysis of trios, we use the TDT test. When population substructure is absent, we find GC is always more powerful than TDT; furthermore, contrary to previous results, we show that as a disease becomes more prevalent the discrepancy in power becomes more extreme. When population substructure is present, however, the results are more complex: TDT is more powerful when population substructure is substantial, and GC is more powerful otherwise. We also explore general issues of power and implementation of GC within the case-control setting and find that, economically, GC is at least comparable to and often less expensive than family-based methods. Therefore, GC methods should prove a useful complement to family-based methods for the genetic analysis of complex traits.     

A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.

Linkage analysis with genetic markers has been successful in the localization of genes for many monogenic human diseases. In studies of complex diseases, however, tests that rely on linkage disequilibrium (the simultaneous presence of linkage and association) are often more powerful than those that rely on linkage alone. This advantage is illustrated by the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT). The TDT requires data (marker genotypes) for affected individuals and their parents; for some diseases, however, data from parents may be difficult or impossible to obtain. In this article, we describe a method, called the "sib TDT" (or "S-TDT"), that overcomes this problem by use of marker data from unaffected sibs instead of from parents, thus allowing application of the principle of the TDT to sibships without parental data. In a single collection of families, there might be some that can be analyzed only by the TDT and others that are suitable for analysis by the S-TDT. We show how all the data may be used jointly in one overall TDT-type procedure that tests for linkage in the presence of association. These extensions of the TDT will be valuable for the study of diseases of late onset, such as non-insulin-dependent diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and other diseases associated with aging.     

Rare de novo germline copy-number variation in testicular cancer

Although heritable factors are an important determinant of risk of early-onset cancer, the majority of these malignancies appear to occur sporadically without identifiable risk factors. Germline de novo copy-number variations (CNVs) have been observed in sporadic neurocognitive and cardiovascular disorders. We explored this mechanism in 382 genomes of 116 early-onset cancer case-parent trios and unaffected siblings. Unique de novo germline CNVs were not observed in 107 breast or colon cancer trios or controls but were indeed found in 7% of 43 testicular germ cell tumor trios; this percentage exceeds background CNV rates and suggests a rare de novo genetic paradigm for susceptibility to some human malignancies.     

在中国汉族人群中，以家系传递分析肿瘤坏死因子a-308A/G单核苷酸多 态性与抽动秽语综合征

目的:探讨在中国汉族人群中,肿瘤坏死因子a(TNF-alpha,TNF-a)基因启动子区-308A/G单核苷酸多态性与抽动秽语综合征(Tourette syndrome,TS)的遗传易感性。方法:91例TS患者及其父母组成的核心家系成员经聚合酶链式反应-限制性片段长度多态性(polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment lengthpolymor phism,PCR-RFLP)方法进行基因分型,评估所有研究对象的TNF-a-308A/G位点的等位基因频率和基因型频率的分布,进行传递不平衡检验(transmission disequilibrium test,TDT),单体型相对风险(haplotype-based haplotyp erelativerisk,HHRR),单体型风险(haplotype relative riskHRR)的研究。结果:TS患者及其父母的等位基因分布经Hardy-Weinberg(H-W)平衡检验显示符合遗传平衡法则。(x2<3.84;P>0.05)TDT、HHRR和HRR研究结果显示该多态性位点的等位基因频率和基因型频率均不存在传递不平衡。结论:我们的数据表明肿瘤坏死因子a启动子区-308A/G单核苷酸多态性位点不是中国汉族人群TS的易感基因位点。     

The transmission/disequilibrium test for linkage on the X chromosome

The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT), which detects linkage between a marker and disease loci in the presence of linkage disequilibrium, was introduced by Spielman et al. The original TDT requires families in which the genotypes are known for both parents and for at least one affected offspring, and this limits its applicability to diseases with late onset. The sib-TDT, or S-TDT, which utilizes families with affected and unaffected siblings, was introduced as an alternative method, by Spielman and Ewens, and the TDT and S-TDT can be combined in an overall test (i.e., a combined-TDT, or C-TDT). The TDT statistics described so far are for autosomal chromosomes. We have extended these TDT methods to test for linkage between X-linked markers and diseases that affect either males only or both sexes. For diseases of late onset, when parental genotypes are often unavailable, the X-linkage C-TDT may allow for more power than is provided by the X-linkage TDT alone.     

Multipoint linkage-disequilibrium-mapping approach based on the case-parent trio design

In the present study we propose a multipoint approach, for the mapping of genes, that is based on the case-parent trio design. We first derive an expression for the expected preferential-allele-transmission statistics for transmission, from either parent to an affected child, for an arbitrary location within a chromosomal region demarcated by several genetic markers. No assumption about genetic mechanism is needed in this derivation, beyond the assumption that no more than one disease gene lies in the region framed by the markers. When one builds on this representation, the way in which one may maximize the genetic information from multiple markers becomes obvious. This proposed method differs from the popular transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) approach for fine mapping, in the following ways: First, in contrast with the TDT approach, all markers contribute information, regardless of whether the parents are heterozygous at any one marker, and incomplete trio data can be utilized in our approach. Second, rather than performing the TDT at each marker separately, we propose a single test statistic that follows a chi(2) distribution with 1 df, under the null hypothesis of no linkage or linkage disequilibrium to the region. Third, in the presence of linkage evidence, we offer a means to estimate the location of the disease locus along with its sampling uncertainty. We illustrate the proposed method with data from a family study of asthma, conducted in Barbados.     

在中国汉族人群中,以家系传递分析肿瘤坏死因子a-308A/G单核苷酸多态性与抽动秽语综合征

目的：探讨在中国汉族人群中,肿瘤坏死因子a（TNF-alpha,TNF-a）基因启动子区-308A/G单核苷酸多态性与抽动秽语综合征（Tourette syndrome,TS）的遗传易感性。方法：91例TS患者及其父母组成的核心家系成员经聚合酶链式反应-限制性片段长度多态性（polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment lengthpolymor phism,PCR-RFLP）方法进行基因分型,评估所有研究对象的TNF-a-308A/G位点的等位基因频率和基因型频率的分布,进行传递不平衡检验（transmission disequilibrium test,TDT）,单体型相对风险（haplotype-based haplotyp erelativerisk,HHRR）,单体型风险（haplotype relative riskHRR）的研究。结果：TS患者及其父母的等位基因分布经Hardy-Weinberg（H-W）平衡检验显示符合遗传平衡法则。（x2〈3.84;P〉0.05）TDT、HHRR和HRR研究结果显示该多态性位点的等位基因频率和基因型频率均不存在传递不平衡。结论：我们的数据表明肿瘤坏死因子a启动子区-308A/G单核苷酸多态性位点不是中国汉族人群TS的易感基因位点。     

Handling Missing Data in Transmission Disequilibrium Test in Nuclear Families with One Affected Offspring

The Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT) compares frequencies of transmission of two alleles from heterozygote parents to an affected offspring. This test requires all genotypes to be known from all members of the nuclear families. However, obtaining all genotypes in a study might not be possible for some families, in which case, a data set results in missing genotypes. There are many techniques of handling missing genotypes in parents but only a few in offspring. The robust TDT (rTDT) is one of the methods that handles missing genotypes for all members of nuclear families [with one affected offspring]. Even though all family members can be imputed, the rTDT is a conservative test with low power. We propose a new method, Mendelian Inheritance TDT (MITDT-ONE), that controls type I error and has high power. The MITDT-ONE uses Mendelian Inheritance properties, and takes population frequencies of the disease allele and marker allele into account in the rTDT method. One of the advantages of using the MITDT-ONE is that the MITDT-ONE can identify additional significant genes that are not found by the rTDT. We demonstrate the performances of both tests along with Sib-TDT (S-TDT) in Monte Carlo simulation studies. Moreover, we apply our method to the type 1 diabetes data from the Warren families in the United Kingdom to identify significant genes that are related to type 1 diabetes.