Size-asymmetric root competition in deep,nutrient-poor soil

Aims There is much evidence that plant competition below ground is size symmetric, i.e. that competing plants share contested resources in proportion to their sizes. Several researchers have hypothesized that a patchy distribution of soil nutrients could result in size-asymmetric root competition. We tested this hypothesis.     

Larger Triticum aestivum plants do not preempt nutrient-rich patches in a glasshouse experiment

Plant competition belowground generally appears to be size-symmetric, i.e. larger plants only obtain a share of belowground resources proportional to their size, and therefore do not suppress smaller individuals. The experimental evidence for size-symmetric belowground competition comes primarily from experiments with homogenous soil conditions. It has been hypothesized that the presence of high nutrient patches that can be pre-empted by larger plants can make competition belowground size-asymmetric. We tested this hypothesis by growing Triticum aestivum individuals singly and in pairs in containers with aboveground dividers so that competition occurred only belowground. Plants grew in either a homogenous soil mixture, or in the same mixture with a band of enriched soil between them. Initial size differences were generated by a seven day difference in sowing date. There was no evidence of size-asymmetric competition with or without soil heterogeneity. Large plants did not have a disproportionate effect on smaller plants, nor did they perform disproportionately better when paired with a small neighbor. Our results suggest that in heterogeneous soil conditions, roots of larger plants that reach nutrient patches first are not able to prevent roots of smaller plants that arrive later from obtaining resources from the patch. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Foraging for nutrients, responses to changes in light, and competition in tropical deciduous tree seedlings

We evaluated (1) the responses of two co-occurring tropical tree species, Heliocarpuspallidus and Caesalpiniaeriostachys, to changes in light, (2) the ability of these species to search for and exploit a fertilized soil patch, (3) the relationship between the capacity to forage for a fertilized patch and the capacity to respond to changes in light availability and (4) how the relationship between light and nutrient acquisition influenced the competitive interactions between these species. Plants of the two species were exposed to a factorial combination of high (H) and low (L) light intensity and fertilized (+Fp) and unfertilized (−Fp) nutrient patches for 50 days. Half of the plants from H were then transferred to L (HL treatment), and half of the plants from L were transferred to H (LH). The remaining plants were kept in their original light condition and grown for another 50 days. Plants were grown in these light and patch treatments alone (one plant per pot) and in interspecific competition (one plant per species resulting in two plants per pot). Both species exploited fertilized patches by increasing root biomass and length in the patch. This enhanced plant productivity and growth rate mainly under LH and HH conditions for Heliocarpus and the HH condition for Caesalpinia). When plants in the HH light environment were grown with an unfertilized patch, plant biomass and relative growth rates (RGRs) were even lower than␣under the LL light environment [(HH–Fp)<LL]. However, the combined activity of shoot and roots when above- and below-ground resources were temporally and spatially heterogeneous influenced plant productivity and growth rate. The benefit from light increase (LH) was reduced when grown with an unfertilized patch. Larger reductions in root biomass, length and density in the patch, and in plant biomass and RGR, were exhibited by Heliocarpus than by Caesalpinia. These results suggest a close relationship between root foraging and light capture, where the benefit of the exploitation of the patch will be reflected in whole-plant benefit, if enough light is captured above-ground. In addition, the results suggest a change in the expected plant responses to light due to heterogeneity in soil nutrients, even though the fertilized patch was only a small proportion of the total soil volume. Leaf characteristics such as specific leaf area responded only to light conditions and not to patchily distributed nutrients. Root characteristics responded more strongly to nutrient heterogeneity. Competition modified the pattern of foraging under both high- and low-light conditions in Heliocarpus by 50 days, and the ability to forage for a fertilized patch under LL after 100 days of growth for Caesalpinia. Even though plant growth and productivity are greatly reduced under low-light conditions (HL and LL), competition modifies the ability of species to forage for a rich patch (especially for the fast-growing species Heliocarpus). Received: 24 November 1997 / Accepted: 15 June 1998     

高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性和生产力关系的光竞争研究

通过施肥形成的生产力由低到高的过程中,物种多样性往往降低。总体竞争假说认为对所有资源的竞争作用对多样性的影响随着生产力提高而加剧,导致物种多样性的下降;光竞争假说则认为随着生产力提高,种间竞争从低生产力时的地下竞争转向高生产力时的光竞争,是光竞争导致了物种多样性的下降。为了验证这两种假说,本文通过在甘南玛曲高寒草甸的均匀施肥实验,研究了光竞争对高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性和生产力关系的影响。结果表明：(1)随着施肥梯度的增加,大部分植物的生长速率加快,高度和叶面积增加;(2)随着施肥梯度的增加,植物群落地上总的生物量提高,叶面积指数增加,透光率降低,物种多样性减少;(3)个体大小不对称的光竞争导致了高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性随施肥梯度的增加而减少。     

Responses of Fraxinus excelsior seedlings to grass-induced above- and below-ground competition

The competitive interactions between woody seedlings and herbaceous vegetation have received increasing interest in recent years. However, little is known about the relative contributions and underlying mechanisms of above- and below-ground competition between species. We used a novel experimental approach to assess the responses of Fraxinus excelsior seedlings to different combinations of root and shoot competition imposed by the grass Dactylis glomerata under greenhouse conditions. Seedling growth was significantly reduced by competition for soil resources, but neither biomass nor height were significantly affected by shoot competition for light. Competitive response indices based on biomass confirmed that below-ground competition was more important than above-ground competition, and indicated that root and shoot competition did not interact to influence plant growth. Fraxinus biomass allocation and seedling traits were almost all significantly affected by root competition; these responses varied depending on the trait examined. In contrast, morphological responses to shoot competition were limited. In the absence of root competition, seedlings showed a significant increase in the biomass allocated to leaves and a greater leaf area ratio in response to shoot competition. Our findings suggest that morphological modifications help to mitigate the negative effects of competition, but the expression of plasticity may be suboptimal due to resource constraints. The present study also highlights the importance of appropriate experimental controls and analysis to avoid confounding effects of experimental design and ontogeny on the interpretation of competitive responses.     

Testing the Stress‐Gradient Hypothesis During the Restoration of Tropical Degraded Land Using the Shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa as a Nurse Plant

The relative importance of facilitation and competition between pairwise plants across abiotic stress gradients as predicted by the stress‐gradient hypothesis has been confirmed in arid and temperate ecosystems, but the hypothesis has rarely been tested in tropical systems, particularly across nutrient gradients. The current research examines the interactions between a pioneer shrub Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (the nurse plant) and seedlings of a transplanted native woody Schima superba (the target species) in a tropical system in which position on a slope corresponds with a nutrient gradient; high soil nutrients at the slope bottom and relatively low soil nutrients at the slope top. In contrast, soil physical traits were more favorable for seedling growth under the shrub than in open spaces. The effect of R. tomentosa on S. superba survival was positive (facilitation) at the top of the slope, as indicated by the relative interaction index (RII), but negative in the bottom (competition). RII indicated a positive effect on seedling height at the top of the slope but was not at the bottom. Seedling survival was positively related to soil nutrient level and negatively related to soil acidity, but seedling growth of S. superba seemed to be enhanced by the shrub canopy. Thus, the results seem to support stress‐gradient hypothesis in terms of target species survival but not growth. We suggest using the shrub as a nurse plant in forest restoration in tropical degraded land with caution because not all of its effects on target species are positive .     

Testing experimentally the effect of soil resource mobility on plant competition

Aims The volume of soil beyond a plant's roots from which that plant is able to acquire a particular nutrient depends upon the mobility of that nutrient in the soil. For this reason it has been hypothesized that the strength of competitive interactions between plants vary with soil nutrient mobility. We aimed to provide an experimental test of this hypothesis.Methods We devised two experimental systems to investigate specifically the effect of nutrient transport rates upon intraspecific competition. In the first, the exchange of rhizosphere water and dissolved nutrients between two connected pots, each containing one plant, was manipulated by alternately raising and lowering the pots. In the second experiment, the roots systems of two competing plants were separated by partitions of differing porosity, thereby varying the plants' access to water and nutrients in the other plant′s rhizosphere. In this second experiment, we also applied varying amounts of nutrients to test whether higher nutrient input would reduce competition when competition for light is avoided, and applied different water levels to affect nutrient concentrations without changing nutrient supply.Important findings In both experiments, lower mobility reduced competitive effects on plant biomass and on relative growth rate (RGR), as hypothesized. In the second experiment, however, competition was more intense under high nutrient input, suggesting that low nutrient supply rates reduced the strength of the superior competitor. Competitive effects on RGR were only evident under the low water level, suggesting that under lower nutrient concentrations, competitive effects might be less pronounced. Taken together, our results provide the first direct experimental evidence that a reduction in nutrient mobility can reduce the intensity of competition between plants.     

Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients

Concentration reduction theory is the leading theory regarding the mechanism of competition for nutrients in soils among plants, yet it has not been rigorously tested. Here we used a spatially explicit, fine-scale grid-based model that simulated diffusion and plant uptake of nutrients by plants in soil to test whether concentration reduction theory was appropriate for terrestrial plant competition for nutrients. In the absence of competition, increasing the rate of diffusion allows a plant to maintain positive growth rates below the lowest average concentration to which it can reduce nutrients in soil solution (R*). As such, differences among plants in the reduction of soil moisture, which here primarily affects nutrient diffusion, can cause R* to predict competitive success incorrectly. The stronger competitor for nutrients captures the largest proportion of the nutrient supply by ensuring nutrients contact its roots before those of a competitor. Although the metric derived from concentration reduction theory, R*, might have predictive power for competitive outcomes in terrestrial ecosystems, this evidence suggests that plants outcompete other plants for nutrients by pre-empting the supply, not reducing the average concentration.     

Mycorrhizal colonization does not affect tolerance to defoliation of an annual herb in different light availability and soil fertility treatments but increases flower size in light-rich environments

Heterogeneous distribution of resources in most plant populations results in a mosaic of plant physiological responses tending to maximize plant fitness. This includes plant responses to trophic interactions such as herbivory and mycorrhizal symbiosis which are concurrent in most plants. We explored fitness costs of 50% manual defoliation and mycorrhizal inoculation in Datura stramonium at different light availability and soil fertility environments in a greenhouse experiment. Overall, we showed that non-inoculated and mycorrhiza-inoculated plants did not suffer from 50% manual defoliation in all the tested combinations of light availability and soil fertility treatments, while soil nutrients and light availability predominately affected plant responses to the mycorrhizal inoculation. Fifty percent defoliation had a direct negative effect on reproductive traits whereas mycorrhiza-inoculated plants produced larger flowers than non-inoculated plants when light was not a limiting factor. Although D. stramonium is a facultative selfing species, other investigations had shown clear advantages of cross-pollination in this species; therefore, the effects of mycorrhizal inoculation on flower size observed in this study open new lines of inquiry for our understanding of plant responses to trophic interactions. Also in this study, we detected shifts in the limiting resources affecting plant responses to trophic interactions.     

The ecological significance of rapid wound-induced changes in plants: insect grazing and plant competition

Summary This paper investigates the hypothesis that a rapidly induced phytochemical response to grazing damage, such as that seen in tomato, serves to deflect insect herbivores away from leaves soon after damaging them (the grazing dispersal hypothesis). As a result, grazing damage is more dispersed than it otherwise would be, and young leaves, which may be of particular importance to a plant in competition for light, are not damaged excessively. In the first experiment, artificial removal of c. 15% of leaf area led to a significant reduction in plant performance compared with undamaged controls, but only when the plants were grown together in competition for light. The second experiment demonstrated that the distribution of grazing damage within the plant was an important factor in the outcome of competition; in those plants in which grazing was applied to the lower leaves there was no effect of damage upon performance compared with undamaged controls, whereas grazing to the upper leaves significantly reduced plant performance. A third experiment provided some insight into how this interaction between damage and competition comes about. It was shown that damage to leaves led to a rapid drop in the rate of extension growth of the main shoot, especially when the upper leaves were damaged, and normal rates of growth were not resumed for at least 3 days. It is argued that in a rapidly growing canopy, such an effect may mean that a damaged plant loses its position in the height hierarchy. The final experiment showed that previous damage to plants can affect the distribution of subsequent grazing by larvae of Spodoptera littoralis, apparently through a wound-induced reduction in leaf palatability. Plants which had been artificially damaged 48 h previously were grazed significantly less than controls, and the avoidance effect was greatest in the young leaves. These results are consistent with the grazing dispersal hypothesis, and suggest that rapid wound-induced responses may be of greatest significance in species characteristic of fertile environments where competition for light is particularly intense.     

Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants

When plants are competing, larger individuals often obtain a disproportionate share of the contested resources and suppress the growth of their smaller neighbors, a phenomenon called size-asymmetric competition. We review what is known about the mechanisms that give rise to and modify the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants, and attempt to clarify some of the confusion in the literature on size asymmetry. We broadly distinguish between mechanisms determined primarily by characteristics of contested resource from those that are influenced by the growth and behavior of the plants themselves. To generate size asymmetric resource competition, a resource must be “pre-emptable.” Because of its directionality, light is the primary, but perhaps not the only, example of a pre-emptable resource. The available data suggest that competition for mineral nutrients is often size symmetric (i.e., contested resources are divided in proportion to competitor sizes), but the potential role of patchily and/or episodically supplied nutrients in causing size asymmetry is largely unexplored. Virtually nothing is known about the size symmetry of competition for water. Plasticity in morphology and physiology acts to reduce the degree of size asymmetry in competition. We argue that an allometric perspective on growth, allocation, resource uptake, and resource utilization can help us understand and quantify the mechanisms through which plants compete. Received: 17 February 1997 / Accepted: 8 October 1997     

A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging

Summary There is widespread uncertainty about the nature and role of morphological plasticity in resource competition in plant communities. We have assayed the foraging characteristics of leaf canopies and root systems of eight herbaceous plants of contrasted ecology using new techniques to create controlled patchiness in light and mineral nutrient supply. The results are compared with those of a conventional competition experiment. Measurements of dry matter partitioning and growth in patchy conditions indicate a consistent positive association between the foraging characteristics of roots and shoots, supporting the hypothesis of strong interdependence of competitive abilities for light and mineral nutrients. Differences are identified in the abilities of dominant and subordinate plants to forage on coarse and fine scalcs. It is suggested that a trade-off exists in the scale (“high” in dominants) and precision (high in subordinates) with which resources are intercepted and that this trade-off contributes to diversity in communities of competing plants.     

植物竞争研究综述

概述了竞争的概念、理论 (包括最大生长率理论、最小资源需求理论和资源动态两阶段说 )、特性 (主要有竞争不对称性和环境相关性 )及其影响因素 ,竞争与群落组成、结构和动态的关系。并对近几十年来生态学上关于植物竞争的争论焦点作了论述 ,即竞争对个体生长、繁殖和存活及群落演替的相对重要性 ,主要介绍了Grime、Newman&Tilman和Deborah&Ariel的 3种观点 ,其中Grime认为竞争不重要 ,相反Newman&Tilman认为竞争比较重要 ,Deborah&Ariel则提出了资源动态两阶段说 ,认为竞争重要与否取决于两个条件 :一为植物对土壤资源的吸收利用与非生物因素两者分别在多大程度上决定了资源可利用性的渐次降低 ;二为资源正波动期因竞争引起的生长量减少在多大程度上决定了资源负波动期个体的存活率     

Explaining productivity-diversity relationships in plants

Relationships between productivity and diversity in plant communities have been widely documented. Unimodal productivity-diversity relationships are most common along natural productivity gradients, and fertilization generally reduces diversity. Five distinct hypotheses invoke changes in competition to explain why diversity should decline from intermediate to high productivity. Because experiments measuring the effects of competition on diversity are rare, four of the five hypotheses have not been directly tested, but each hypothesis makes unique predictions that allow for indirect tests. The indirect evidence is often conflicting, and while none of the hypotheses can be rejected, only the dynamic equilibrium hypothesis is consistently supported. A new hypothesis, however, is supported by indirect evidence and may help to explain the variation in the shape of productivity-diversity relationships, as well as the most common patterns. Diversity may be high in environments that promote size symmetric competition, where soil resources limit growth and are homogeneously distributed within the soil volume explored by individual plants. Conversely, diversity may be low in environments that promote size asymmetric competition, where light is limiting, or where soil resources are limiting and are patchily distributed within rooting zones.     

施氮对空心莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)和莲子草(Alternanthera sessilis)种间关系的影响

自然界的氮素释放总是呈现出空间和时间上的异质性,但关于异质性氮释放对于入侵植物和本地植物种间关系影响的研究相对较少。将入侵植物空心莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)和同属本地植物莲子草(Alternanthera sessilis)分别进行单种种植(12株,无种间竞争)和混种种植(每种6株,有种间竞争),模拟大气氮湿沉降设置由两种不同施氮总量(15g N m~(-2)a~(-1)和30g N m~(-2)a~(-1))和两种不同施氮频率(每5天1次和每15天1次)交叉组成的4种施氮处理,并以不施氮为对照。施氮总量的增加显著促进了两种植物的生长,但对两种植物的种间竞争关系没有显著影响。施氮频率对两种植物的生长以及种间竞争关系都没有显著影响。两种植物在面对竞争时表现出不同的生物量分配策略,空心莲子草将更多的生物量分配到茎,而莲子草将更多的生物量分配到根。在全球变化的背景下,大气氮湿沉降可能会改变两种植物的种群结构和动态,但可能对这两种植物的种间关系影响较小。     

Improving grasslands: the influence of soil moisture and nitrogen fertilization on the establishment of seedlings

1. In order to investigate the factors influencing the establishment of seedlings in permanent grassland, the influence of soil moisture and nitrogen fertilization on competition between established plants of Lolium perenne and seedlings of Phleum pratense or Trifolium pratense was studied in two experiments under greenhouse conditions using the 'split-box'-technique.
2. There was no difference in the production of plant dry matter of P. pratense or T. pratense between 30% volumetric soil water content (−0·005 MPa) and 22% (−0·04 MPa), but 15% soil moisture (−0·33 MPa) reduced plant growth. L. perenne yields were linearly reduced by reduced soil moisture content.
3. Shoot competition from L. perenne reduced the plant dry matter yield of P. pratense and T. pratense more than did root competition in these experiments. When shoot competition was present, differences between moisture contents were not detected, indicating that light was probably the limiting resource under such conditions. No significant interaction between root competition and soil moisture was observed for plant weight.
4. Root competition was not prevented even though sufficient water and nitrogen were supplied. This indicated either that some other growth factor was limiting or the plants competed for resources at the root hair level even though sufficient resources were supplied at the pot or field scale. Therefore, in the situation of direct drilling of species during grassland renovation, it may be difficult to alleviate competition by adequate provision of water and nitrogen.     

A test of the compensatory continuum: fertilization increases and below-ground competition decreases the grazing tolerance of tall wormseed mustard (Erysimum strictum)

Contrary to the general expectation, the compensatory continuum hypothesis proposes that grazing may not always affect plant performance adversely. Instead, the effects may vary from negative (undercompensation) to positive (overcompensation), depending on the local availability of resources and the intensity of competition experienced by individual plants. We tested this hypothesis in a common garden experiment by growing tall wormseed mustard, Erysimum strictum, under a factorial design involving simulated grazing (0, 10, or 50% of the main stem clipped), supplemental fertilization and below-ground competition. The results supported the hypothesis. On an average, fertilization increased and competition decreased plant performance. Overcompensation was only observed among the fertilized plants growing free of competition. Simulated grazing increased seed yield 1.6 (10% clipping) and 1.4 times (50% clipping) as compared to unclipped plants when the plants were grown with fertilization and without competition. In contrast, clipping did not significantly increase seed yield in the plants grown without fertilization and/or with competition. The breakage of apical dominance provides a proximate mechanism of these regrowth responses. This is consistent with the fact that most plants (85%) had an unbranched shoot architecture in our study population. However, it is not clear why E. strictum has a relatively unbranched architecture in natural populations. We briefly discuss the alternative ecological factors – competition for light, adaptation to herbivory and optimal timing of flowering as a bet-hedging strategy in monocarpic plants – which might maintain unbranched architecture in this species. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Effect of soil nutrients,neighbor identities and root separation types on intra‐ and interspecific interaction among three clonal plant species

In natural environments, plants frequently interact with both heterospecific and conspecific neighbors. The intensity of belowground plant interaction with neighboring species commonly varies with the availability of soil nutrients in the habitats. According to classical ecological theory, competition between conspecific neighbors may be more severe than competition between unrelated species due to the similar nutrient requirements of close relatives, especially when nutrients are scarce in the habitat. However, many recent studies have shown the opposite pattern, and suggested an alternative mechanism based on species recognition. Taking Zoysia sinica as the focal species, we conducted a controlled experiment to test the results of intraspecific and interspecific interactions among three clonal species Zoysia sinica, Zoysia japonica and Alternanthera philoxeroides, which represent a conspecific, a close relative and a distant relative of the focal species, respectively, and at different root treatments (no separation NS, clone separation CS and ramet separation RS) and two nutrient levels. The results showed that Z. sinica recognized conspecific plants in the NS and CS treatments, and did not show above or belowground competition with these. The performance of the focal plant (Z. sinica) was better when it was grown with a conspecific neighbor as compared to all other types of neighbors. In all root separation treatments, the competition was more intense when Z. sinica grew with a close relative (Z. japonica) than when growing with a distant relative (A. philoxeroides). Generally, competition between plants was more intense at the high nutrient level than at the low nutrient level, suggesting that both soil nutrients and a species recognition mechanism play a significant role for the intra‐ and interspecific interaction and fitness of these three neighboring clonal species.     

Grazing tolerance and mycorrhizal colonization: Effects of resource manipulation and plant size in biennial Gentianella campestris

As herbivory usually leads to loss of photosynthesizing biomass, its consequences for plants are often negative. However, in favorable conditions, effects of herbivory on plants may be neutral or even beneficial. According to the compensatory continuum hypothesis plants can tolerate herbivory best in resource-rich conditions. Besides herbivory, also primarily positive biotic interactions like mycorrhizal symbiosis, bear carbon costs. Tritrophic plant–fungus–herbivore interaction further complicates plant's cost-benefit balance, because herbivory of the host plant is expected to cause decline in mycorrhizal colonization under high availability of soil nutrients when benefits of symbiosis decline in relation to costs. To gain insight into above interactions we tested the effects of plant size and resource manipulation (simulated herbivory and fertilization) on both above-ground performance and on root fungal colonization of the biennial Gentianella campestris.Clipping caused allocation shift from height growth to branches in all groups except in large and fertilized plants. For large plants nutrient addition may have come too late, as the number of meristems was most likely determined already before the fertilization. Clipping decreased the amount of DSE (dark septate endophytic) fungi which generally are not considered to be mycorrhizal. The effect of clipping on total fungal colonization and colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal coils were found to depend on host size and resource level. Dissimilar mycorrhizal response to simulated herbivory in small vs. large plants could be due to more intensive light competition in case of small plants. Carbon limited small plants may not be able to maintain high mycorrhizal colonization, whereas large clipped plants allocate extra resources to roots and mycorrhizal fungi at the expense of above-ground parts. Our results suggest that herbivory may increase carbon limitation that leads re-growing shoots and fungal symbionts to function as competing sinks for the limited carbon reserves.