Influence of various factors on the recognition specificity of tRNAs by yeast valyl-tRNA synthetase.

Using filtration through nitrocellulose membranes we found that complexes between yeast valyl-tRNA synthetase can easily be detected at low pH and ionic strength with the cognate tRNAVal, but also with several non-cognate tRNAs (tRNAPhe, tRNATyr, tRNAMet and tRNAAsp). We show here that the amino acid linked to the tRNA has no detectable effect on these interactions. The influence of various factors on the discrimination by the enzyme between the cognate and the non-cognate tRNAs has been studied. An increase in pH or ionic strength leads to a decrease in the same ratio of the affinity constants between the enzyme and the cognate as well as the noncognate tRNA. The addition of organic solvents has little effect on these constant either in the cognate or in the non-cognate systems; the addition of substrates of the aminoacylation reaction has not effect on the ratio between the constants. This similar behaviour suggests that at least part of the specific of non-specific interactions must be identical. On the contrary, magnesium between 1 mM and 50 mM increases the specificity of recognition, showing the importance of slight conformational changes in the tRNA molecule to the specificity of interaction.     

Solvation change and ion release during aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Discrimination between cognate and non-cognate tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases occurs at several steps of the aminoacylation pathway. We have measured changes of solvation and counter-ion distribution at various steps of the aminoacylation pathway of glutamyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases. The decrease in the association constant with increasing KCl concentration is relatively small for cognate tRNA binding when compared to known DNA–protein interactions. The electro-neutral nature of the tRNA binding domain may be largely responsible for this low ion release stoichiometry, suggesting that a relatively large electrostatic component of the DNA–protein interaction free energy may have evolved for other purposes, such as, target search. Little change in solvation upon tRNA binding is seen. Non-cognate tRNA binding actually increases with increasing KCl concentration indicating that charge repulsion may be a significant component of binding free energy. Thus, electrostatic interactions may have been used to discriminate between cognate and non-cognate tRNAs in the binding step. The catalytic constant of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase increases with increasing osmotic pressure indicating a water release of 8.4 ± 1.4 mol/mol in the transition state, whereas little change is seen in the case of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. We propose that the significant amount of water release in the transition state, in the case of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, is due to additional contact of the protein with the tRNA in the transition state.     

MIST,a Novel Approach to Reveal Hidden Substrate Specificity in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARSs) constitute a family of RNA-binding proteins, that participate in the translation of the genetic code, by covalently linking amino acids to appropriate tRNAs. Due to their fundamental importance for cell life, AARSs are likely to be one of the most ancient families of enzymes and have therefore been characterized extensively. Paradoxically, little is known about their capacity to discriminate tRNAs mainly because of the practical challenges that represent precise and systematic tRNA identification. This work describes a new technical and conceptual approach named MIST (Microarray Identification of Shifted tRNAs) designed to study the formation of tRNA/AARS complexes independently from the aminoacylation reaction. MIST combines electrophoretic mobility shift assays with microarray analyses. Although MIST is a non-cellular assay, it fully integrates the notion of tRNA competition. In this study we focus on yeast cytoplasmic Arginyl-tRNA synthetase (yArgRS) and investigate in depth its ability to discriminate cellular tRNAs. We report that yArgRS in submicromolar concentrations binds cognate and non-cognate tRNAs with a wide range of apparent affinities. In particular, we demonstrate that yArgRS binds preferentially to type II tRNAs but does not support their misaminoacylation. Our results reveal important new trends in tRNA/AARS complex formation and potential deep physiological implications.     

Macromolecular recognition through electrostatic repulsion.

In the process of genetic translation, each aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specifically aminoacylates its cognate tRNAs and rejects the 19 other species of tRNAs. A decrease in the specificity of this reaction can result in misincorporations of amino acids into proteins and be deleterious to the cell. In the case of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from Bacillus stearothermophilus, the change of residue Glu152 into Ala results in erroneous interactions with non-cognate tRNAs. To analyse how Glu152 contributes to the discrimination between tRNAs by tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, 11 changes to this residue were created by mutagenesis. The misaminoacylations of tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Val) with tyrosine in vitro (on a scale going from 1 to 30) and the toxicity of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase in vivo (on a scale from 1 to 10(7)) increased in a correlated way when the nature of the side chain in position 152 varied from negatively charged to uncharged then to positively charged. The aminoacylation of tRNA(Tyr) was unaffected by the mutations. The results show that the role of Glu152 in the discrimination between tRNAs is purely negative, that it acts by electrostatic repulsion of non-cognate tRNAs and that this mechanism has been conserved throughout evolution.     

tRNA discrimination by T. thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase at the binding step

The extent of tRNA recognition at the level of binding by Thermus thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), one of the most complex class II synthetases, has been studied by independent measurements of the enzyme association with wild-type and mutant tRNA(Phe)s as well as with non-cognate tRNAs. The data obtained, combined with kinetic data on aminoacylation, clearly show that PheRS exhibits more tRNA selectivity at the level of binding than at the level of catalysis. The anticodon nucleotides involved in base-specific interactions with the enzyme prevail both in the initial binding recognition and in favouring aminoacylation catalysis. Tertiary nucleotides of base pair G19-C56 and base triple U45-G10-C25 contribute primarily to stabilization of the correctly folded tRNA(Phe) structure, which is important for binding. Other nucleotides of the central core (U20, U16 and of the A26-G44 tertiary base pair) are involved in conformational adjustment of the tRNA upon its interaction with the enzyme. The specificity of nucleotide A73, mutation of which slightly reduces the catalytic rate of aminoacylation, is not displayed at the binding step. A few backbone-mediated contacts of PheRS with the acceptor and anticodon stems revealed in the crystal structure do not contribute to tRNA(Phe) discrimination, their role being limited to stabilization of the complex. The highest affinity of T. thermophilus PheRS for cognate tRNA, observed for synthetase-tRNA complexes, results in 100-3000-fold binding discrimination against non-cognate tRNAs.     

Evidence for two types of complexes formed by yeast tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase with cognate and non-cognate tRNA. Effect of ribonucleoside triphosphates

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at pH 8.3 was used to detect and quantitate the formation of the yeast tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (an alpha 2-type enzyme) complex with its cognate tRNA. Electrophoretic mobility of the complex is intermediate between the free enzyme and free tRNA; picomolar quantities can be readily detected by silver staining and quantitated by densitometry of autoradiograms when [32P]tRNA is used. Two kinds of complexes of Tyr-tRNA synthetase with yeast tRNA(Tyr) were detected. A slower-moving complex is formed at ratios of tRNA(Tyr)/enzyme less than or equal to 0.5; it is assigned the composition tRNA.(alpha 2)2. At higher ratios, a faster-moving complex is formed, approaching saturation at tRNA(Tyr)/enzyme = 1; any excess of tRNA(Tyr) remains unbound. This complex is assigned the composition tRNA.alpha 2. The slower, i.e. tRNA.(alpha 2)2 complex, but not the faster complex, can be formed even with non-cognate tRNAs. Competition experiments show that the affinity of the enzyme towards tRNA(Tyr) is at least 10-fold higher than that for the non-cognate tRNAs. ATP and GTP affect the electrophoretic mobility of the enzyme and prevent the formation of tRNA.(alpha 2)2 complexes both with cognate and non-cognate tRNAs, while neither tyrosine, as the third substrate of Tyr tRNA synthetase, nor AMP, AMP/PPi, or spermidine, have such effects. Hence, the ATP-mediated formation of the alpha 2 structure parallels the increase in specificity of the enzyme towards its cognate tRNA.     

Transfer RNA determinants for translational editing by Escherichia coli valyl-tRNA synthetase

Valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS) has difficulty differentiating valine from structurally similar non-cognate amino acids, most prominently threonine. To minimize errors in aminoacylation and translation the enzyme catalyzes a proofreading (editing) reaction that is dependent on the presence of cognate tRNA^Val. Editing occurs at a site functionally distinct from the aminoacylation site of ValRS and previous results have shown that the 3′-terminus of tRNA^Val is recognized differently at the two sites. Here, we extend these studies by comparing the contribution of aminoacylation identity determinants to productive recognition of tRNA^Val at the aminoacylation and editing sites, and by probing tRNA^Val for editing determinants that are distinct from those required for aminoacylation. Mutational analysis of Escherichia coli tRNA^Val and identity switch experiments with non-cognate tRNAs reveal a direct relationship between the ability of a tRNA to be aminoacylated and its ability to stimulate the editing activity of ValRS. This suggests that at least a majority of editing by the enzyme entails prior charging of tRNA and that misacylated tRNA is a transient intermediate in the editing reaction.     

RNA minihelices and the decoding of genetic information

The rules of the genetic code are determined by the specific aminoacylation of transfer RNAs by aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase. A straightforward analysis shows that a system of synthetase-tRNA interactions that relies on anticodons for specificity could, in principle, enable most synthetases to distinguish their cognate tRNA isoacceptors from all others. Although the anticodons of some tRNAs are recognition sites for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, for other synthetases the anticodon is dispensable for specific aminoacylation. In particular, alanine and histidine tRNA synthetases aminoacylate small RNA minihelices that reconstruct the part of their cognate tRNAs that is proximate to the amino acid attachment site. Helices with as few as six base pairs can be efficiently aminoacylated. The specificity of aminoacylation is determined by a few nucleotides and can be converted from one amino acid to another by the change of only a few nucleotides. These findings suggest that, for a subgroup of the synthetases, there is a distinct code in the acceptor helix of transfer RNAs that determines aminoacylation specificity.     

Role of tRNA amino acid-accepting end in aminoacylation and its quality control

Aminoacyl–tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are remarkable enzymes that are in charge of the accurate recognition and ligation of amino acids and tRNA molecules. The greatest difficulty in accurate aminoacylation appears to be in discriminating between highly similar amino acids. To reduce mischarging of tRNAs by non-cognate amino acids, aaRSs have evolved an editing activity in a second active site to cleave the incorrect aminoacyl–tRNAs. Editing occurs after translocation of the aminoacyl–CCA₇₆ end to the editing site, switching between a hairpin and a helical conformation for aminoacylation and editing. Here, we studied the consequence of nucleotide changes in the CCA₇₆ accepting end of tRNA^Leu during the aminoacylation and editing reactions. The analysis showed that the terminal A₇₆ is essential for both reactions, suggesting that critical interactions occur in the two catalytic sites. Substitutions of C₇₄ and C₇₅ selectively decreased aminoacylation keeping nearly unaffected editing. These mutations might favor the regular helical conformation required to reach the editing site. Mutating the editing domain residues that contribute to CCA₇₆ binding reduced the aminoacylation fidelity leading to cell-toxicity in the presence of non-cognate amino acids. Collectively, the data show how protein synthesis quality is controlled by the CCA₇₆ homogeneity of tRNAs.     

Effects of adenosine triphosphate and magnesium chloride on affinity elution of aminoacyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetases from phosphocellulose with transfer ribonucleic acids.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases of bakers' yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) were adsorbed to a phosphocellulose (P-cellulose) column, and those specific for tyrosine [EC 6.1.1.1], threonine [EC 6.1.1.3], valine [EC 6.1.1.9], and isoleucine [EC 6.1.1.5] were eluted with several specific tRNAs. Elutions of these synthetases were affected by ATP and/or MgCl2. The effects of ATP and MgCl2 differ with synthetases. Elutions of tyrosyl- and valyl-tRNA synthetases with their cognate tRNAs were more specific in the presence of MgCl2. Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase was eluted with its cognate tRNA in the presence of both ATP and MgCl2. On the other hand, threonyl-tRNA synthetase was eluted in the absence of ATP and MgCl2 with unfractionated tRNA but not with some non-cognate tRNAs. This suggests that elution of threonyl-tRNA synthetase is highly specific. The present data on the effects of ATP or MgCl2 or both on this affinity elution will be useful for simple and rapid purification of the synthetases.     

Functional idiosyncrasies of tRNA isoacceptors in cognate and noncognate aminoacylation systems

The specificity of transfer RNA aminoacylation by cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is a crucial step for synthesis of functional proteins. It is established that the aminoacylation identity of a single tRNA or of a family of tRNA isoacceptors is linked to the presence of positive signals (determinants) allowing recognition by cognate synthetases and negative signals (antideterminants) leading to rejection by the noncognate ones. The completion of identity sets was generally tested by transplantation of the corresponding nucleotides into one or several host tRNAs which acquire as a consequence the new aminoacylation specificities. Such transplantation experiments were also useful to detect peculiar structural refinements required for optimal expression of a given aminoacylation identity set within a host tRNA. This study explores expression of the defined yeast aspartate identity set into different tRNA scaffolds of a same specificity, namely the four yeast tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors. The goal was to investigate whether expression of the new identity is similar due to the unique specificity of the host tRNAs or whether it is differently expressed due to their peculiar sequences and structural features. In vitro transcribed native tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors and variants bearing the aspartate identity elements were prepared and their aminoacylation properties established. The four wild-type isoacceptors are active in arginylation with catalytic efficiencies in a 20-fold range and are inactive in aspartylation. While transplanted tRNA(1)(Arg) and tRNA(4)(Arg) are converted into highly efficient substrates for yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg) and tRNA(3)(Arg) remain poorly aspartylated. Search for antideterminants in these two tRNAs reveals idiosyncratic features. Conversion of the single base-pair C6-G67 into G6-C67, the pair present in tRNA(Asp), allows full expression of the aspartate identity in the transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg), but not in tRNA(3)(Arg). It is concluded that the different isoacceptor tRNAs protect themselves from misaminoacylation by idiosyncratic pathways of antidetermination.     

Initial position of aminoacylation of individual Escherichia coli, yeast, and calf liver transfer RNAs.

Transfer RNAs from Escherichia coli, yeast (Sacharomyces cerevisiae), and calf liver were subjected to controlled hydrolysis with venom exonuclease to remove 3'-terminal nucleotides, and then reconstructed successively with cytosine triphosphate (CTP) and 2'- or 3'-deoxyadenosine 5'-triphosphate in the presence of yeast CTP(ATP):tRNA nucleotidyltransferase. The modified tRNAs were purified by chromatography on DBAE-cellulose or acetylated DBAE-cellulose and then utilized in tRNA aminoacylation experiments in the presence of the homologous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase activities. The E. coli, yeast, and calf liver aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases specific for alanine, glycine, histidine, lysine, serine, and threonine, as well as the E. coli and yeast prolyl-tRNA synthetases and the yeast glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase utilized only those homologous modified tRNAs terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine (i.e., having an available 3'-OH group). This is interpreted as evidence that these aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases normally aminoacylate their unmodified cognate tRNAs on the 3'-OH group. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from all three sources specific argining, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and valine, as well as the E. coli and yeast enzymes specific for methionine and the E. coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, used as substrates exclusively those tRNAs terminating in 3'-deoxyadenosine. Certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including the E. coli, yeast, and calf liver asparagine and tyrosine activating enzymes, the E. coli and yeast cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases, and the aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from yeast, utilized both isomeric tRNAs as substrates, although generally not at the same rate. While the calf liver aspartyl- and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases utilized only the corresponding modified tRNA species terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine, the use of a more concentrated enzyme preparation might well result in aminoacylation of the isomeric species. The one tRNA for which positional specificity does seem to have changed during evolution is tryptophan, whose E. coli aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase utilized predominantly the cognate tRNA terminating in 3'-deoxyadenosine, while the corresponding yeast and calf liver enzymes were found to utilize predominantly the isomeric tRNAs terminating in 2'-deoxyadenosine. The data presented indicate that while there is considerable diversity in the initial position of aminoacylation of individual tRNA isoacceptors derived from a single source, positional specificity has generally been conserved during the evolution from a prokaryotic to mammalian organism.     

Altered expression of plant lysyl tRNA synthetase promotes tRNA misacylation and translational recoding of lysine

The Arabidopsis thaliana lysyl tRNA synthetase (AtKRS) structurally and functionally resembles the well-characterized prokaryotic class IIb KRS, including the propensity to aminoacylate tRNA(Lys) with suboptimal identity elements, as well as non-cognate tRNAs. Transient expression of AtKRS in carrot cells promotes aminoacylation of such tRNAs in vivo and translational recoding of lysine at nonsense codons. Stable expression of AtKRS in Zea mays causes translational recoding of lysine into zeins, significantly enriching the lysine content of grain.     

Interaction of yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase with Blue-dextran Sepharose : assignment of the Blue-Dextran Binding site on the synthetases

Yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase like nucleotidyl transferases previously investigated interact with the Blue-Dextran-Sepharose affinity ligand through their tRNA binding domain: the enzymes are readily displaced from the affinity column by their cognate tRNAs but not by ATP or a mixture of ATP and the cognate amino acid in contrast to other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. In the absence of Mg⁺⁺, the arginyl-tRNA synthetase can be dissociated from the column by tRNA^Asp and tRNA^Phe which have been shown to be able to form a complex with the synthetase, but in presence of Mg⁺⁺ the elution is only obtained by the specific tRNA.The procedure described here can thus be used: (i) to detect polynucleotide binding sites in a protein; (ii) to estimate the relative affinities of different tRNAs for a purified synthetase; (iii) to purify an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by selective elution with the cognate tRNA.     

The tRNA A76 Hydroxyl Groups Control Partitioning of the tRNA-dependent Pre- and Post-transfer Editing Pathways in Class I tRNA Synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze ATP-dependent covalent coupling of cognate amino acids and tRNAs for ribosomal protein synthesis. Escherichia coli isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS) exploits both the tRNA-dependent pre- and post-transfer editing pathways to minimize errors in translation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which tRNA^Ile organizes the synthetic site to enhance pre-transfer editing, an idiosyncratic feature of IleRS, remains elusive. Here we show that tRNA^Ile affects both the synthetic and editing reactions localized within the IleRS synthetic site. In a complex with cognate tRNA, IleRS exhibits a 10-fold faster aminoacyl-AMP hydrolysis and a 10-fold drop in amino acid affinity relative to the free enzyme. Remarkably, the specificity against non-cognate valine was not improved by the presence of tRNA in either of these processes. Instead, amino acid specificity is determined by the protein component per se, whereas the tRNA promotes catalytic performance of the synthetic site, bringing about less error-prone and kinetically optimized isoleucyl-tRNA^Ile synthesis under cellular conditions. Finally, the extent to which tRNA^Ile modulates activation and pre-transfer editing is independent of the intactness of its 3′-end. This finding decouples aminoacylation and pre-transfer editing within the IleRS synthetic site and further demonstrates that the A76 hydroxyl groups participate in post-transfer editing only. The data are consistent with a model whereby the 3′-end of the tRNA remains free to sample different positions within the IleRS·tRNA complex, whereas the fine-tuning of the synthetic site is attained via conformational rearrangement of the enzyme through the interactions with the remaining parts of the tRNA body.     

Structure-specific tRNA determinants for editing a mischarged amino acid

Alanyl-tRNA synthetase efficiently aminoacylates tRNAAla and an RNA minihelix that comprises just one domain of the two-domain L-shaped tRNA structure. It also clears mischarged tRNAAla using a specialized domain in its C-terminal half. In contrast to full-length tRNAAla, minihelixAla was robustly mischarged and could not be edited. Addition in trans of the missing anticodon-containing domain did not activate editing of mischarged minihelixAla. To understand these differences between minihelixAla and tRNAAla, several chimeric full tRNAs were constructed. These had the acceptor stem of a non-cognate tRNA replaced with the stem of tRNAAla. The chimeric tRNAs collectively introduced multiple sequence changes in all parts but the acceptor stem. However, although the acceptor stem in isolation (as the minihelix) lacked determinants for editing, alanyl-tRNA synthetase effectively cleared a mischarged amino acid from each chimeric tRNA. Thus, a covalently continuous two-domain structure per se, not sequence, is a major determinant for clearance of errors of aminoacylation by alanyl-tRNA synthetase. Because errors of aminoacylation are known to be deleterious to cell growth, structure-specific determinants constitute a powerful selective pressure to retain the format of the two-domain L-shaped tRNA.     

Study of the role of the acceptor stem in the interactions between tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Several studies have clearly demonstrated that the end of the acceptor stem was a very important area determining the aminoacylation properties of tRNAs. However the attempts to measure the contribution of this region to the binding of tRNAs to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have led to contradictory results. We report here the stepwise degradation of yeast tRNA-Phe and tRNA-Val from their 3' terminus, up to the seventh nucleotide : the affinity of each of the degraded-tRNA for their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase was compared to that of intact tRNA and it was found that these affinities are not significantly decreased when compared to those of the intact tRNAs.     

Identity elements for specific aminoacylation of a tRNA by mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase bearing a nonspecific tRNA-interacting factor

Mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) has an N-terminal polypeptide chain extension appended to a prokaryotic-like synthetase domain. This extension, termed a tRNA-interacting factor (tIF), possesses a RNA-binding motif [KxxxK(K/R)xxK] that binds nonspecifically the acceptor TPsiC stem-loop domain of tRNA and provides a potent tRNA binding capacity to this enzyme. Consequently, native LysRS aminoacylates a RNA minihelix mimicking the amino acid acceptor stem-loop domain of tRNA(3)(Lys). Here, examination of minihelix recognition showed that mammalian LysRS aminoacylates RNA minihelices without specificity of sequence, revealing that none of the nucleotides from the acceptor TPsiC stem-loop domain are essential determinants of tRNA(Lys) acceptor identity. To test whether the tIF domain reduces the specificity of the synthetase with regard to complete tRNA molecules, aminoacylation of wild-type and mutant noncognate tRNAs by wild-type or N-terminally truncated LysRS was examined. The presence of the UUU anticodon of tRNA(Lys) appeared to be necessary and sufficient to transform yeast tRNA(Asp) or tRNA(i)(Met) into potent lysine acceptor tRNAs. Thus, nonspecific RNA-protein interactions between the acceptor stem of tRNA and the tIF domain do not relax the tRNA specificity of mammalian LysRS. The possibility that interaction of the full-length cognate tRNA with the synthetase is required to induce the catalytic center of the enzyme into a productive conformation is discussed.