Nuclear RNA export in yeast.

Eukaryotic cells massively exchange macromolecules (proteins and RNAs) between the nucleus and cytoplasm through the nuclear pore complexes. Whereas a mechanistic picture emerges of how proteins are imported into and exported from the nucleus, less is known about nuclear exit of the different classes of RNAs. However, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers an experimental system to study nuclear RNA export in vivo and thus to genetically dissect the different RNA export machineries. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge and recent progress in identifying components involved in nuclear RNA export in yeast.     

Qualitative highly divergent nuclear export signals can regulate export by the competition for transport cofactors in vivo

Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of proteins is mediated by nuclear export signals, identified in various proteins executing heterologous biological functions. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the orchestration of export is only poorly understood. Using microinjection of defined recombinant export substrates, we now demonstrate that leucine-rich nuclear export signals varied dramatically in determining the kinetics of export in vivo . Thus, nuclear export signals could be kinetically classified which correlated with their affinities for CRM1-containing export complexes in vitro . Strikingly, cotransfection experiments revealed that proteins containing a fast nuclear export signal inhibited export and the biological activity of proteins harboring a slower nuclear export signal in vivo . The affinity for export complexes seems therefore predominantly controlled by the nuclear export signal itself, even in the context of the complete protein in vivo . Overexpression of FG-rich repeats of nucleoporins affected a medium nuclear export signal containing protein to the same extent as a fast nuclear export signal containing protein, indicating that nucleoporins appear not to contribute significantly to nuclear export signal-specific export regulation. Our results imply a novel mode for controlling the biological activity of shuttle proteins already by the composition of the nuclear export signal itself.     

HnRNP proteins and the nuclear export of mRNA

Pre-mRNAs associate in the nucleus with specific RNA-binding proteins to form heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) complexes. The hnRNP proteins participate directly or indirectly in the processing of pre-mRNAs into mature mRNAs. Recent studies have shown that some hnRNP proteins shuttle continuously between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The export of shuttling hnRNP proteins from the nucleus is mediated by specific nuclear export sequences (NESs) within the proteins. In addition, shuttling hnRNP proteins appear to remain bound to exported mRNAs in transit through nuclear pores. As discussed in this review, the picture that is emerging is that nuclear export of mRNAs is mediated by the export of NES-containing hnRNP proteins to which they are bound.     

Steady-state nuclear localization of exportin-t involves RanGTP binding and two distinct nuclear pore complex interaction domains

Vertebrate tRNA export receptor exportin-t (Xpo-t) binds to RanGTP and mature tRNAs cooperatively to form a nuclear export complex. Xpo-t shuttles bidirectionally through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) but is mainly nuclear at steady state. The steady-state distribution of Xpo-t is shown to depend on its interaction with RanGTP. Two distinct Xpo-t NPC interaction domains that bind differentially to peripherally localized nucleoporins in vitro are identified. The N terminus binds to both Nup153 and RanBP2/Nup358 in a RanGTP-dependent manner, while the C terminus binds to CAN/Nup214 independently of Ran. We propose that these interactions increase the concentration of tRNA export complexes and of empty Xpo-t in the vicinity of NPCs and thus increase the efficiency of the Xpo-t transport cycle.     

Inner nuclear envelope protein SUN1 plays a prominent role in mammalian mRNA export

Nuclear export of messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs) through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) can be roughly classified into two forms: bulk and specific export, involving an nuclear RNA export factor 1 (NXF1)-dependent pathway and chromosome region maintenance 1 (CRM1)-dependent pathway, respectively. SUN proteins constitute the inner nuclear envelope component of the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex. Here, we show that mammalian cells require SUN1 for efficient nuclear mRNP export. The results indicate that both SUN1 and SUN2 interact with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) F/H and hnRNP K/J. SUN1 depletion inhibits the mRNP export, with accumulations of both hnRNPs and poly(A)+RNA in the nucleus. Leptomycin B treatment indicates that SUN1 functions in mammalian mRNA export involving the NXF1-dependent pathway. SUN1 mediates mRNA export through its association with mRNP complexes via a direct interaction with NXF1. Additionally, SUN1 associates with the NPC through a direct interaction with Nup153, a nuclear pore component involved in mRNA export. Taken together, our results reveal that the inner nuclear envelope protein SUN1 has additional functions aside from being a central component of the LINC complex and that it is an integral component of the mammalian mRNA export pathway suggesting a model whereby SUN1 recruits NXF1-containing mRNP onto the nuclear envelope and hands it over to Nup153.     

beta-Catenin shows an overlapping sequence requirement but distinct molecular interactions for its bidirectional passage through nuclear pores

beta-Catenin is an example of a typical molecule that can be translocated bidirectionally through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) on its own in a facilitated manner. In this work the nuclear import and export of beta-catenin were examined to compare the sequence requirement of this molecule and to determine whether molecular interactions required for its bidirectional NPC passage are distinct or not. Deletion analysis of beta-catenin revealed that armadillo repeats 10-12 and the C terminus comprise the minimum region necessary for nuclear migration activity. Further dissection of this fragment showed that the C terminus tail plays an essential role in nuclear migration. The region of beta-catenin required for export substantially overlapped the region required for import. Therefore, the NPC translocation of beta-catenin is apparently reversible, which is consistent with findings reported previously. However, different translocating molecules blocked nuclear import and export of beta-catenin differentially. The data herein indicate that beta-catenin shows an overlapping sequence requirement for its import and export but that bidirectional movement through the NPC proceeds through distinct molecular interactions.     

Nucleocytoplasmic transport enters the atomic age

Nucleocytoplasmic transport occurs through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and is mediated by saturable transport receptors that shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Our understanding of the molecular interactions underlying this process has improved dramatically as a result of the elucidation of the crystal structures of several nuclear transport factors either alone or in a complex with other components of the nuclear transport machinery. Furthermore, a conserved family of proteins, which is distinct from the well characterized family of importin beta-like nuclear export receptors, is implicated in the export of messenger RNA to the cytoplasm.     

Exportin 6: a novel nuclear export receptor that is specific for profilin.actin complexes

Active macromolecular transport between the nucleus and cytoplasm proceeds through nuclear pore complexes and is mostly mediated by transport receptors of the importin beta-superfamily. Here we identify exportin 6 (Exp6) as a novel family member from higher eukaryotes and show that it mediates nuclear export of profilin.actin complexes. Exp6 appears to contact primarily actin, but the interaction is greatly enhanced by the presence of profilin. Profilin thus functions not only as the nucleotide exchange factor for actin, but can also be regarded as a cofactor of actin export and hence as a suppressor of actin polymerization in the nucleus. Even though human and Drosophila Exp6 share only approximately 20% identical amino acid residues, their function in profilin.actin export is conserved. A knock-down of Drosophila Exp6 by RNA interference abolishes nuclear exclusion of actin and results in the appearance of nuclear actin paracrystals. In contrast to a previous report, we found no indications of a major and direct role for CRM1 in actin export from mammalian or insect nuclei.     

Visualizing nuclear export of different classes of RNA by electron microscopy.

Export of RNA from the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm occurs through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). To examine nuclear export of RNA, we have gold-labeled different types of RNA (i.e., mRNA, tRNA, U snRNAs), and followed their export by electron microscopy (EM) after their microinjection into Xenopus oocyte nuclei. By changing the polarity of the negatively charged colloidal gold, complexes with mRNA, tRNA, and U1 snRNA can be formed efficiently, and gold-tagged RNAs are exported to the cytoplasm with kinetics and specific saturation behavior similar to that of unlabeled RNAs. U6 snRNA conjugates, in contrast, remain in the nucleus, as does naked U6 snRNA. During export, RNA-gold was found distributed along the central axis of the NPC, within the nuclear basket, or accumulated at the nuclear and cytoplasmic periphery of the central gated channel, but not associated with the cytoplasmic fibrils. In an attempt to identify the initial NPC docking site(s) for RNA, we have explored various conditions that either yield docking of import ligands to the NPC or inhibit the export of nuclear RNAs. Surprisingly, we failed to observe docking of RNA destined for export at the nuclear periphery of the NPC under any of these conditions. Instead, each condition in which export of any of the RNA-gold conjugates was inhibited caused accumulation of gold particles scattered uniformly throughout the nucleoplasm. These results point to the existence of steps in export involving mobilization of the export substrate from the nucleoplasm to the NPC.     

Exportin 4: a mediator of a novel nuclear export pathway in higher eukaryotes

Transport receptors of the importin beta superfamily account for many of the nuclear import and export events in eukaryotic cells. They mediate translocation through nuclear pore complexes, shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm and co-operate with the RanGTPase system to regulate their interactions with cargo molecules in a compartment-specific manner. We used affinity chromatography on immobilized RanGTP to isolate further candidate nuclear transport receptors and thereby identified exportin 4 as the most distant member of the importin beta family so far. Exportin 4 appears to be conserved amongst higher eukaryotes, but lacks obvious orthologues in yeast. It mediates nuclear export of eIF-5A (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A) and possibly that of other cargoes. The export signal in eIF-5A appears to be complex and to involve the hypusine modification that is unique to eIF-5A. We discuss possible cellular roles for nuclear export of eIF-5A.     

Receptor-mediated substrate translocation through the nuclear pore complex without nucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis

Background: The transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm is an energy-dependent process. Substrates are translocated across the nuclear envelope through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Translocation requires nucleocytoplasmic transport receptors of the importin β family, which interact both with the NPC and, either directly or via an adaptor, with the transport substrate. Although certain receptors have recently been shown to cross the NPC in an energy-independent manner, translocation of substrate–receptor complexes through the NPC has generally been regarded as an energy-requiring step.Results: We describe an in vitro system that is based on permeabilised cells and supports nuclear export mediated by leucine-rich nuclear export signals. In this system, export is dependent on exogenous CRM1/Exportin1 – a nuclear export receptor – the GTPase Ran and nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs), and is further stimulated by Ran-binding protein 1 (RanBP1) and nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). Unexpectedly, non-hydrolysable NTP analogues completely satisfy the NTP requirements for a single-round of CRM1-mediated translocation of protein substrates across the NPC. Similarly, single transportin-mediated nuclear protein import events are shown not to require hydrolysable NTPs and to occur in the absence of the Ran GTPase.Conclusions: Our data show that, contrary to expectation and prior conclusions, the translocation of substrate–receptor complexes across the NPC in either direction occurs in the absence of NTP hydrolysis and is thus energy independent. The energy needed to drive substrate transport against a concentration gradient is supplied at the step of receptor recycling in the cytoplasm.     

Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of the TACC Protein Mia1p/Alp7p Is Required for Remodeling of Microtubule Arrays during the Cell Cycle

Microtubule arrays are remodeled as cells proceed through the cell cycle. It is important to understand how remodeling is regulated in time and space. In fission yeast, the conserved microtubule associated TACC/TOG complex plays an important role in organizing microtubules throughout the cell cycle. Here we show that this complex undergoes nucleocytoplasmic shuttling through the nuclear import and export signals located in the TACC protein Mia1p/Alp7p. When the Crm1p-dependent nuclear export signal of Mia1p is disabled, Mia1p accumulates in the nucleus while its partner protein Alp14p/TOG is restricted to the cytoplasm. This leads to defects in assembly of both interphase arrays and the mitotic spindle. Artificial targeting of Alp14p to the nucleus partially rescues the mitotic spindle defects caused by lack of Mia1p nuclear export. Interestingly, the nuclear export sequence of Mia1p appears to overlap with the Alp14p binding site. We propose that intricate regulation of the subcellular distribution of TACC/TOG complexes drives microtubule array remodeling as cells progress through the cell cycle.     

Ran-dependent nuclear export mediators: a structural perspective

Nuclear export is an essential eukaryotic activity. It proceeds through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and is mediated by soluble receptors that shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm. RanGTPase-dependent export mediators (exportins) constitute the largest class of these carriers and are functionally highly versatile. All of these exportins load their substrates in response to RanGTP binding in the nucleus and traverse NPCs as ternary RanGTP-exportin-cargo complexes to the cytoplasm, where GTP hydrolysis leads to export complex disassembly. The different exportins vary greatly in their substrate range. Recent structural studies of both protein- and RNA-specific exporters have illuminated how exportins bind their cargoes, how Ran triggers cargo loading and how export complexes are disassembled in the cytoplasm. Here, we review the current state of knowledge and highlight emerging principles as well as prevailing questions.     

p21(Cip1) Promotes cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation via direct inhibition of nuclear export.

There is increasing evidence that p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) are requisite positive regulators of cyclin D1.CDK4 assembly and nuclear accumulation. Both Cip and Kip proteins can promote nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1, but the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. We now provide evidence that p21(Cip1) promotes the nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 complexes via inhibition of cyclin D1 nuclear export. In vivo, we demonstrate that p21(Cip1) can inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta-triggered cyclin D1 nuclear export and phosphorylation-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. Furthermore, we find that cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation in p21/p27 null cells can be restored through inhibition of CRM1-dependent nuclear export. The ability of p21(Cip1) to inhibit cyclin D1 nuclear export correlates with its ability to bind to Thr-286-phosphorylated cyclin D1 and thereby prevents cyclin D1.CRM1 association.     

Nup358/RanBP2 attaches to the nuclear pore complex via association with Nup88 and Nup214/CAN and plays a supporting role in CRM1-mediated nuclear protein export

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) traverse the nuclear envelope (NE), providing a channel through which nucleocytoplasmic transport occurs. Nup358/RanBP2, Nup214/CAN, and Nup88 are components of the cytoplasmic face of the NPC. Here we show that Nup88 localizes midway between Nup358 and Nup214 and physically interacts with them. RNA interference of either Nup88 or Nup214 in human cells caused a strong reduction of Nup358 at the NE. Nup88 and Nup214 showed an interdependence at the NPC and were not affected by the absence of Nup358. These data indicate that Nup88 and Nup214 mediate the attachment of Nup358 to the NPC. We show that localization of the export receptor CRM1 at the cytoplasmic face of the NE is Nup358 dependent and represents its empty state. Also, removal of Nup358 causes a distinct reduction in nuclear export signal-dependent nuclear export. We propose that Nup358 provides both a platform for rapid disassembly of CRM1 export complexes and a binding site for empty CRM1 recycling into the nucleus.     

Transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm.

Nuclear transport is an energy-dependent process mediated by saturable receptors. Import and export receptors are thought to recognize and bind to nuclear localization signals or nuclear export signals, respectively, in the transported molecules. The receptor-substrate interaction can be direct or mediated by an additional adapter protein. The transport receptors dock their cargoes to the nuclear pore complexes (NPC) and facilitate their translocation through the NPC. After delivering their cargoes, the receptors are recycled to initiate additional rounds of transport. Because a transport event for a cargo molecule is unidirectional, the transport receptors engage in asymmetric cycles of translocation across the NPC. The GTPase Ran acts as a molecular switch for receptor-cargo interaction and imparts directionality to the transport process. Recently, the combined use of different in vitro and in vivo approaches has led to the characterization of novel import and export signals and to the identification of the first nuclear import and export receptors.