Skeletal effects of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) transporter inhibition: evidence from clinical studies

The discovery of a functional serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) in bone has given rise to questions about the physiologic role of 5-HT in bone, and the possible clinical implications for humans. 5-HT is known to play a role in the pathophysiology of depression, and many antidepressant medications function by inhibiting the 5-HTT. Among the antidepressants, those that selectively block the 5-HTT (namely, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs) appear to have skeletal effects. Several studies have demonstrated lower bone density, increased rates of bone loss at the hip, and increased rates of fracture among older individuals taking SSRIs. However, there remains uncertainty about whether it is the antidepressant medications themselves or the reason for their use (depression) that is responsible for these observed bone changes. This paper reviews the epidemiologic literature that explores the role of the 5-HTT in bone health, by looking at questions about how depression, antidepressant therapy and SSRIs impact bone health in humans. Further research will be important to better understand how these factors interact to influence skeletal status, and to characterize the biochemical mechanism through which 5-HT may mediate bone turnover and metabolism.     

Changes in brain metabolites measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy in antidepressant responders with comorbid major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder

In a present pilot study, performed on 11 subjects, we studied proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) changes in early to intermediate (3-6 weeks) responders to antidepressant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). All subjects had diagnosis of major recurrent depression comorbid to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Magnetic spectroscopy was done in the region of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on a 3T MRI-unit. Participants were selected out of the larger sample due to an early response to antidepressant treatment within 3-6 weeks, measured with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). We measured levels of neuronal marker N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), choline (CHO) and creatine (Cr). There was no difference in NAA/Cr ratios between the first and the second spectroscopic scans (p= 0.751). However, CHO/Cr ratios showed increasing trend with mean value at the first scan of 1.09 (SD =0.22) while mean value at second scan was 1.25 (SD=0.24), displaying statistically significant difference (p=0.015). In conclusion, significant increase in choline to creatine ratio from the first to the second spectroscopic scan during the antidepressant treatment, compared to almost identical values of NAA to creatine ratio, suggests increased turnover of cell membranes as a mechanism of the early response to the antidepressant drug therapy.     

Separation of new antidepressants and their metabolites by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNaRIs) and noradrenergic and specific serotoninergic antidepressant (NaSSA) are widely used in the treatment of depression. An increase in antidepressant intoxications led to the development of reliable analytical methods for their analysis. A new determination procedure for these compounds (milnacipran, venlafaxine, desmethylvenlafaxine, mirtazapine, desmethylmirtazapine, citalopram, desmethylcitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline and fluoxetine) was developed by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) with diode array detection (DAD). Separation and determination were optimised on an uncoated fused-silica capillary (600 mm, 75 microm I.D.). The migration buffer consisted of 20 mM sodium borate, pH 8.55, with 20 mM SDS and 15% isopropanol, at an operating voltage of 25 kV. The column temperature was maintained at 40 degrees C. Injection in the capillary was performed in the hydrodynamic mode (0.5 p.s.i., 15 s). In these conditions, the migration time of the antidepressants was less than 11 min. In most cases, calibration curves were established for 30 - 2000 ng/ml (r > 0.995). The limit of detection and the limit of quantification were ranged between 10 and 20 and between 20 and 30 ng/ml, respectively, for all the molecules. This method allowed the determination of some of these compounds in biological fluids (blood, urine) in post-mortem cases. Samples (1 ml) were extracted with diethyl ether (5 ml) at pH 9.6 and reconstituted in diluted migration buffer. Similar results were obtained by a HPLC-DAD determination, performed as a reference method. These results suggest that this MEKC method can be useful for the determination of new antidepressants in post-mortem cases.     

Gender differences in depression

Depression is twice as common in women as in men, although some concern has been raised in terms of misdiagnosing depression in men. The incidence of depression in women varies during the life span. The peak incidence during childbearing years appears to be associated with cyclic hormonal changes. Women also present with reproductive -specific mood disorders: pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), depression in pregnancy, postpartal mood disorder (PDD) and perimenopausal depressive disorder. Gender differences were repeatedly observed in response to antidepressant medication. Premenopausal women appear to respond poorly and to show low tolerability to TCAs, but they tend to show greater responsiveness to the SSRIs. In contrast, men and postmenopausal women can respond equally to the TCAs and SSRIs. These differences are contributed to gender differences in pharmacokinetics of antidepressants and to the influence of menstrual cycle. These findings suggest the need for a gender-specific approach to the evaluation and management of depression.     

Genetic Prediction of Antidepressant Drug Response and Nonresponse in Korean Patients

Genetic polymorphism contributes to variation in response to drug treatment of depression. We conducted three independent 6-week treatment studies in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) to develop a pharmacogenomic model predicting response and nonresponse. We screened candidate genomic markers for association with response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). No patients had received any antidepressant drug treatment in the current episode of depression. Outcome evaluation was blinded to drug and genotype data. The prediction model derived from a development sample of 239 completer cases treated with SSRIs comprised haplotypes and polymorphisms related to serotonin synthesis, serotonin transport, glutamate receptors, and GABA synthesis. The model was evaluated prospectively for prediction of outcome in a validation sample of 176 new SSRI-treated completer cases. The model gave a prediction in 60% of these cases. Predictive values were 85% for predicted responders and 86% for predicted nonresponders, compared to prior probabilities of 66% for observed response and 34% for observed nonresponse in those cases (both P<0.001). Convergent cross-validation was obtained through failure of the model to predict outcomes in a third independent sample of 189 completer cases who received non-SSRI antidepressants. We suggest proof of principle for genetic guidance to use or avoid SSRIs in a majority of Korean depressed patients.     

Mammalian cystatin and protagonists in brain diseases

Abstract

Cystatins are the thiol Proteinase inhibitors, present ubiquitously in mammalian body. They prevent unwanted proteolysis and play important role in several diseases. Regulation of cysteine Proteinase and their inhibitors is of utmost importance in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer, amyloid angiopathy and in many other diseases. The action of these cysteine proteases is biologically controlled by proteinase inhibitors namely cystatins(cys) they constitute a superfamily of homologous proteins. The major role of cystatins is to protect the organism against endogenous proteases released from lysosomes, invading microorganisms and parasites that use cysteine proteases to enter the body. An enormous progress has been made in understanding of protein degradation process under normal and pathological conditions; in fact proteases are now clearly viewed as important drug targets. Some studies have suggested that cystatin C is a target for intervention in neurological disorders because its expression increases in response to human neurological disorders and in animal models of neurodegenerative states. Although, these studies did not clarify whether CysC up-regulation is a pathogenic factor in neurodegenerative disorders or whether it represents a neuroprotective compensatory response of the organisms aimed to prevent progression of the disease. However, for other diseases in some cases cystatins other than cys C are up regulated and in some it is down regulated.

Cystatins have been implicated in the processes of neuronal degeneration and repair of the nervous system. Both CysC and CysB are potent, reversible inhibitors of most of the currently known cathepsins. The extent of proteolytic activity at any given time and location is the result of a balance between active proteases and physiological inhibitors. Uncontrolled proteolysis as a result of imbalance between active proteases and their endogenous inhibitors has been associated with neuronal cell death in different neuronal diseases, including brain tumors, stroke, some forms of epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and neurological autoimmune diseases.

An antidepressant is a psychiatric medication used to alleviate mood disorders, major depression and other brain diseases. Drugs including the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are most commonly used antidepressant. They are also used to treat other conditions, such as anxiety disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder, eating disorders, and chronic pain. Although the mechanisms of the action of these antidepressants are not precisely understood, their principal target of action is at the monoamine transporter proteins located at nerve endings. Monoamine neurotransmitter transporters act to terminate synaptic neurotransmission. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or SSRIs are also most widely used class of antidepressants. They work by increasing the level of serotonin in the brain. SSRIs have fewer and milder side effects, fewer drug interactions, and are much less likely to be associated with suicide than TCAs.

These antidepressants shows binding when incubated with cystatin, presenting the involvement of these antidepressant in cascade of disease, as leaving no cystatin to inhibit the cathepsin showing the myriad side effect after the administration of antidepressant. This might be one of the reason in the mechanism of action of antidepressant.

So this review expound about the role of cystatins in neurological diseases which is considered to be highly significant as it pave the way for commanding tool in the drug design.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma     

Pharmacoproteomic investigation into antidepressant response in two mouse inbred strains

In this study, we present a pharmacoproteomic investigation of response to antidepressants two inbred strains. Our aim was to uncover molecular mechanisms underlying antidepressant action and identify new biomarkers to determine therapeutic response to two antidepressants with proven efficacy in the treatment of depression but divergent mechanisms of action. Mice were treated with the pro-noradrenergic drug nortriptyline, the pro-serotonergic drug escitalopram or saline. Quantitative proteomic analyses were undertaken on hippocampal tissue from a study design that used two inbred mouse strains, two depressogenic protocols and a control condition, (maternal separation, chronic mild stress, control), two antidepressant drugs and two dosing protocols. The proteomic analysis was aimed at the identification of specific drug-response markers. Complementary approaches, 2DE and isobaric tandem mass tagging (TMT), were applied to the selected experimental groups. To investigate the relationship between proteomic profiles, depressogenic protocols and drug response, 2DE and TMT data sets were analysed using multivariate methods. The results highlighted significant strain- and stress-related differences across both 2DE and TMT data sets and identified the three gene products involved in serotonergic (PXBD5, YHWAB, SLC25A4) and one in noradrenergic antidepressant action (PXBD6).     

Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987‐2013

More than fifteen years ago, it was noted that the failure rate of antidepressant clinical trials was high, and such negative outcomes were thought to be related to the increasing magnitude of placebo response. However, there is considerable debate regarding this phenomenon and its relationship to outcomes in more recent antidepressant clinical trials. To investigate this, we accessed the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews for sixteen antidepressants (85 trials, 115 trial arms, 23,109 patients) approved between 1987 and 2013. We calculated the magnitude of placebo and antidepressant responses, antidepressant‐placebo differences, as well as the effect sizes and success rates, and compared these measures over time. Exploratory analysis investigated potential changes in trial design and conduct over time. As expected, the magnitude of placebo response has steadily grown in the past 30 years, increasing since 2000 by 6.4% (r=0.46, p<0.001). Contrary to expectations, a similar increase has occurred in the magnitude of antidepressant response (6.0%, r=0.37, p<0.001). Thus, the effect sizes (0.30 vs. 0.29, p=0.42) and the magnitude of antidepressant‐placebo differences (10.5% vs. 10.3%, p=0.37) have remained statistically equivalent. Furthermore, the frequency of positive trial arms has gone up in the past 15 years (from 47.8% to 63.8%), but this difference in frequency has not reached statistical significance. Trial design features that were previously associated with a possible lower magnitude of placebo response were not implemented, and their relationship to the magnitude of placebo response could not be replicated. Of the 34 recent trials, two implemented enhanced interview techniques, but both of them were unsuccessful. The results of this study suggest that the relationship between the magnitude of placebo response and the outcome of antidepressant clinical trials is weak at best. These data further indicate that antidepressant‐placebo differences are about the same for all of the sixteen antidepressants approved by the FDA in the past thirty years.     

An index of 5-HT synthesis changes during early antidepressant treatment: alpha-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan PET study

The antidepressant selective serotonin transporter inhibitors (SSRIs) are clinically active after a delay of several weeks. Indeed, the rapid increase of serotonin (5-HT) caused by SSRIs, stimulates the 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors, which exert a negative feedback on the 5-HT neurotransmission. Only when autoreceptors are desensitized, can SSRIs exert their therapeutic activity. The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist pindolol has been used to accelerate the clinical effects of antidepressant by preventing the negative feedback. Using the alpha-[(11)C]methyl-L-tryptophan/positron emission tomography (PET), the goal of the present double-blind, randomized study was to compare the changes in alpha-[(11)C]methyl-L-tryptophan trapping, an index of serotonin synthesis, in patients suffering from unipolar depression treated with the SSRI citalopram (20 mg/day) plus placebo versus patients treated with citalopram plus pindol (7.5 mg/day). PET and Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS-17) were performed at baseline, and after 10 and 24 days of antidepressant treatment. Results show that the combination citalopram plus pindol, compared to citalopram alone shows a more rapid and greater increase of an index of 5-HT synthesis in prefrontal cortex (BA 9). This research is the first human PET study demonstrating that, after 24 days, the combination SSRIs plus pindolol produces a greater increase of the metabolism of serotonin in the prefrontal cortex, an area associated to depressive symptoms.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and gastrointestinal bleeding: a case-control study

Background

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been associated with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Given their worldwide use, even small risks account for a large number of cases. This study has been conducted with carefully collected information to further investigate the relationship between SSRIs and upper GI bleeding.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study in hospitals in Spain and in Italy. Cases were patients aged ≥18 years with a primary diagnosis of acute upper GI bleeding diagnosed by endoscopy; three controls were matched by sex, age, date of admission (within 3 months) and hospital among patients who were admitted for elective surgery for non-painful disorders. Exposures to SSRIs, other antidepressants and other drugs were defined as any use of these drugs in the 7 days before the day on which upper gastrointestinal bleeding started (index day).

Results

581 cases of upper GI bleeding and 1358 controls were considered eligible for the study; no differences in age or sex distribution were observed between cases and controls after matching. Overall, 4.0% of the cases and 3.3% of controls used an SSRI antidepressant in the week before the index day. No significant risk of upper GI bleeding was encountered for SSRI antidepressants (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.57–1.96) or for whichever other grouping of antidepressants.

Conclusions

The results of this case-control study showed no significant increase in upper GI bleeding with SSRIs and provide good evidence that the magnitude of any increase in risk is not greater than 2.     

Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Antidepressants in Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Depression is a common non-motor symptom in patients with Parkinson''s disease (PD). There are many kinds of antidepressants being used, such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and Dopamine agonists which are suggested as alternative antidepressants for the treatment of depression in PD. Which one should we choose first? Literatures have shown inconsistent results.

Methods

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and acceptability of therapeutic methods for the treatment of depression in Parkinson''s disease.

Results

We used the odds ratios (OR) as effect size firstly and the results indicated no statistical significance between each compared intervention. Then we used the logarithm of the individual odds ratios as effect size. With efficacy of TCAs as the standard of comparison, the degree of incoherence (a measure of how closely the entire network fits together) was small (ω =  4.824827e-05). The logor were: SSRIs −0.69 (95% CI −1.28– −0.10); Pramipexole −0.73 (−1.71– −0.26); Pergolide −1.97 (−3.67– 0.27); SNRIs −0.86 (−1.86– 0.15); Placebo −1.24 (−1.99– −0.50). With Placebo as the standard of comparison, the logor were: TCAs 1.24 (0.50– 1.99); SSRIs 0.55 (−0.03– 1.13); Pramipexole 0.51 (−0.12– 1.15); Pergolide −0.73 (−2.25– 0.80); SNRIs 0.38 (−0.42– 1.19); TCAs, pramipexole, pergolide and SNRIs showed better profile of acceptability, leading to significant fewer discontinuations than that of SSRIs.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support antidepressant efficacy for SSRIs, pramipexole, pergolide and SNRIs. TCAs might be the best choice when starting antidepressant treatment in patients of Parkinson''s disease because it has the most favorable balance between benefits and acceptability, followed by pramipexole and SNRIs, SSRIs might be the last choice.     

A prospective study of the psychobehavioral factors responsible for a change from non-patient irritable bowel syndrome to IBS patient status

Background

The literature measuring effects of antidepressant and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depression on heart rate variability (HRV) in medically well individuals was reviewed.

Methods

Fourteen studies evaluating HRV were included. Twenty three pre-post or within group comparisons were available. Treatment impact on measures of HRV was pooled over studies. We examined different classes of antidepressants, and for short and long electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings separately.

Results

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were associated with declines in most measures of HRV and significant increase in heart rate (HR) in studies with short recording intervals. No significant changes were found for longer recording times. Treatment effects with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were more variable. Short-recording studies revealed a significant decrease in HR and an increase in one HRV measure. In two 24-hour recording studies no significant changes were observed. No relationship between ECT and HRV has been established in the literature. The effects of other drugs are reported.

Limitations

Few studies measure the effects of treatment of depression on HRV. Existing studies have generally used very small samples, employing a variety of measurements and methodologies.

Conclusion

We confirm that TCAs are associated with a large decrease in HRV and increase HR. However, data for SSRIs is not clear. Although the effect of SSRIs on HRV is weaker than for TCAs, evidence shows that SSRIs are associated with a small decrease in HR, and an increase in one measure of HRV. The use of TCAs in depression leads to changes in HRV that are associated with increased risk of mortality.     

Activation of the inflammatory response system: A new look at the etiopathogenesis of major depression

Major depression is accompanied by various direct and indirect indicators of a moderate activation of the inflammatory response system (IRS). Increased production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6 and interferon (IFNgamma), may play a crucial role in the immune and acute phase response in depression. Lower serum zinc and changes in the erythron are indirect indicators of IRS activation in depression. The reciprocal relationships between IRS activation and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis hyperactivity, alterations in HP thyroid (HPT)-axis function and the availability of tryptophan to the brain led us to hypothesize that these neuroendocrine changes in depression are indicators of IRS activation and that a combined dysregulation of the IRS, the turnover of serotonin (5-HT) and the HPA-axis is an integral component of depression. The IRS activation model of depression provides an explanation for the psycho-social (external stress) as well as organic (internal stress) etiology of major depression. Antidepressive treatments with various antidepressive agents, including SSRIs, tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants, have in vivo and in vitro negative immunoregulatory effects, suggesting that their antidepressant efficacy may be attributed, in part, to their immune effects.     

Comparison of the Effects of Antidepressants and Their Metabolites on Reuptake of Biogenic Amines and on Receptor Binding

1. The present survey compares the effects of antidepressants and their principal metabolites on reuptake of biogenic amines and on receptor binding. The following antidepressants were included in the study: the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline, dothiepin, and lofepramine and the atypical antidepressant bupropion, which all have considerable market shares in the UK and/or US markets; the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline; and the recently approved antidepressants venlafaxine and nefazodone.2. Amitriptyline has similar in vitro reuptake inhibitory potencies for 5-HT and NA, whereas the metabolite nortriptyline is preferentially a NA reuptake inhibitor. Both amitriptyline and nortriptyline are also 5-HT₂ receptor antagonists.3. Dothiepin has equipotent 5-HT and NA reuptake inhibitory activity, whereas northiaden shows a slight selectivity for NA reuptake inhibition. Dothiepin and northiaden are also 5-HT₂ receptor antagonists. The slow elimination rate of northiaden (36–46 hr) compared to dothiepin (14–24 hr) suggests that northiaden contributes significantly to the therapeutic effect of dothiepin.4. Lofepramine is extensively metabolized to desipramine. Desipramine plays an important role in the antidepressant activity of lofepramine, as the plasma elimination half-life of lofepramine (4–6 hr) is much shorter than that of desipramine (24 hr). Both compounds are potent and selective inhibitors of NA reuptake.5. The five approved SSRIs, citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline, are potent 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, and the demethyl metabolites, norfluoxetine, demethylsertraline, and demethylcitalopram, also show selectivity. Paroxetine and sertraline are the most potent inhibitors of 5-HT reuptake, whereas citalopram is the most selective. Fluoxetine is the least selective and the metabolite of fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, is a more selective and more potent 5-HT reuptake inhibitor than the parent compound and has an extremely long half-life (7–15 compared to 1–3 days). Thus the metabolite plays an important role for the therapeutic effect of fluoxetine. Fluoxetine is also a 5-HT_2C receptor antagonist. Demethylsertraline is a weaker and less selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor in vitro than sertraline, but demethylsertraline has a very long half-life (62–104 hr) compared to the parent compound (24 hr) and it might play a role in the therapeutic effects of sertraline. Demethylcitalopram has about a 10 times lower 5-HT reuptake inhibitory potency in vitro than citalopram, and the elimination half-lives are approximately 1.5 and 2 days, respectively.6. Bupropion and hydroxybupropion are weak inhibitors of biogenic amine reuptake. The mechanisms of action responsible for the clinical effects of bupropion are not fully understood, but it has been suggested that both dopaminergic and noradrenergic components play a role and that the hydroxybupropion metabolite contributes significantly to the antidepressant activity.7. Venlafaxine and O-demethylvenlafaxine are weak inhibitors of 5-HT and NA reuptake, and the selectivity ratios are close to one. O-Demethylvenlafaxine is eliminated more slowly than venlafaxine (plasma half-lives of 5 and 11 hr, respectively), and it is likely that it contributes to the overall therapeutic effect of venlafaxin.8. Nefazodone and -hydroxynefazodone are equipotent 5-HT and NA reuptake inhibitors. Both compounds are also 5-HT₂ receptor antagonists. Both parent compound and metabolite have short elimination half-lives.     

Genetic Predictors of Response to Serotonergic and Noradrenergic Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder: A Genome-Wide Analysis of Individual-Level Data and a Meta-Analysis

Background

It has been suggested that outcomes of antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder could be significantly improved if treatment choice is informed by genetic data. This study aims to test the hypothesis that common genetic variants can predict response to antidepressants in a clinically meaningful way.

Methods and Findings

The NEWMEDS consortium, an academia–industry partnership, assembled a database of over 2,000 European-ancestry individuals with major depressive disorder, prospectively measured treatment outcomes with serotonin reuptake inhibiting or noradrenaline reuptake inhibiting antidepressants and available genetic samples from five studies (three randomized controlled trials, one part-randomized controlled trial, and one treatment cohort study). After quality control, a dataset of 1,790 individuals with high-quality genome-wide genotyping provided adequate power to test the hypotheses that antidepressant response or a clinically significant differential response to the two classes of antidepressants could be predicted from a single common genetic polymorphism. None of the more than half million genetic markers significantly predicted response to antidepressants overall, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, or differential response to the two types of antidepressants (genome-wide significance p<5×10⁻⁸). No biological pathways were significantly overrepresented in the results. No significant associations (genome-wide significance p<5×10⁻⁸) were detected in a meta-analysis of NEWMEDS and another large sample (STAR*D), with 2,897 individuals in total. Polygenic scoring found no convergence among multiple associations in NEWMEDS and STAR*D.

Conclusions

No single common genetic variant was associated with antidepressant response at a clinically relevant level in a European-ancestry cohort. Effects specific to particular antidepressant drugs could not be investigated in the current study. Please see later in the article for the Editors'' Summary     

Epigenetic Regulation of Serotonin Transporter in Psychiatric Disorders

SLC6A4 (solute carrier family 6,member 4) gene encodes a serotonin transporter (5-hydroxytryptamine transporter,HTT),which transports synaptic serotonin into presynaptic terminal.SLC6A4 is known to be the target of antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).Inhibition of HTT increases synaptic serotonin concentration and thereby exerts antidepressant efficacy.A large number of genetic studies suggest the contribution of genetic variations of SLC6A4 to various psychiatric disorders.The most studied genetic variation,HTT-linked polymorphic region (HTTLPR),is located at the promoter region of SLC6A4.     

Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The use of antidepressant medications and the resulting costs have increased dramatically in recent years, partly because of the introduction of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). An assessment of the clinical and economic aspects of SSRIs compared with the older tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) was initiated to generate information for purchasers of these drugs as well as clinicians. One component of this study was an examination of the adverse effects associated with the use of these drugs. METHODS: Searches of bibliographic databases (for January 1980 through May 1996) and manual scanning of both peer-reviewed publications and other documents were used to identify double-blind, randomized controlled trials involving at least one SSRI and one TCA. For the study of adverse effects, only trials that had at least 20 patients in each trial arm and that reported rates of adverse effects in both arms were retained. In total 84 trials reporting on 18 adverse effects were available. Meta-analyses were undertaken to calculate pooled differences in rates of adverse effects. The question of whether the method of eliciting information from patients about adverse effects made a difference in the findings was also examined. Finally, differences in drop-out rates due to adverse effects were calculated. RESULTS: The crude rates of occurrence of adverse effects ranged from 4% (palpitations) to 26% (nausea) for SSRIs and from 4% (diarrhea) to 27% (dry mouth) for TCAs. The differences in the rates of adverse effects between the 2 types of drugs ranged from 14% more with SSRIs (for nausea) to 11% more with TCAs (for constipation). The results did not depend on the method of eliciting information from patients. There were no statistically significant differences between drug classes in terms of drop-outs due to adverse effects. INTERPRETATION: SSRIs and TCAs are both associated with adverse effects, although the key effects differ between the drug classes. Further explanation of the adverse effects and their relation to discontinuation of medication will require better studies involving prospective collection of quality-of-life data.     

Serotonin (5HT), fluoxetine, imipramine and dopamine target distinct 5HT receptor signaling to modulate Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying behavior

Drugs that target the serotonergic system are the most commonly prescribed therapeutic agents and are used for treatment of a wide range of behavioral and neurological disorders. However, the mechanism of the drug action remain a conjecture. Here, we dissect the genetic targets of serotonin (5HT), the selective 5HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine (Prozac), the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine, and dopamine. Using the well-established serotonergic response in C. elegans egg-laying behavior as a paradigm, we show that action of fluoxetine and imipramine at the 5HT reuptake transporter (SERT) and at 5HT receptors are separable mechanisms. Even mutants completely lacking 5HT or SERT can partially respond to fluoxetine and imipramine. Furthermore, distinct mechanisms for each drug can be recognized to mediate these responses. Deletion of SER-1, a 5HT1 receptor, abolishes the response to 5HT but has only a minor effect on the response to imipramine and no effect on the response to fluoxetine. In contrast, deletion of SER-4, a 5HT2 receptor, confers significant resistance to imipramine while leaving the responses to 5HT or fluoxetine intact. Further, fluoxetine can stimulate egg laying via the Gq protein EGL-30, independent of SER-1, SER-4, or 5HT. We also show that dopamine antagonizes the 5HT action via the 5HT-gated ion channel MOD-1 signaling, suggesting that this channel activity couples 5HT and dopamine signaling. These results suggest that the actions of these drugs at specific receptor subtypes could determine their therapeutic efficacy. SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants may regulate 5HT outputs independently of synaptic levels of 5HT.     

Association between suicide attempts and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Objective To establish whether an association exists between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and suicide attempts.Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Data sources Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration''s register of controlled trials (November 2004) for trials produced by the Cochrane depression, anxiety, and neurosis group.Selection of studies Studies had to be randomised controlled trials comparing an SSRI with either placebo or an active non-SSRI control. We included clinical trials that evaluated SSRIs for any clinical condition. We excluded abstracts, crossover trials, and all trials whose follow up was less than one week.Results Seven hundred and two trials met our inclusion criteria. A significant increase in the odds of suicide attempts (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence 1.14 to 4.55, number needed to treat to harm 684) was observed for patients receiving SSRIs compared with placebo. An increase in the odds ratio of suicide attempts was also observed in comparing SSRIs with therapeutic interventions other than tricyclic antidepressants (1.94, 1.06 to 3.57, 239). In the pooled analysis of SSRIs versus tricyclic antidepressants, we did not detect a difference in the odds ratio of suicide attempts (0.88, 0.54 to 1.42).Discussion Our systematic review, which included a total of 87 650 patients, documented an association between suicide attempts and the use of SSRIs. We also observed several major methodological limitations in the published trials. A more accurate estimation of risks of suicide could be garnered from investigators fully disclosing all events.