Helicobacter pylori "rescue" therapy after failure of two eradication treatments

Nowadays, apart from having to know well first-line eradication regimens, we must also be prepared to face Helicobacter pylori treatment failures. Therefore, in designing a treatment strategy we should not focus on the results of primary therapy alone, but also on the final--overall--eradication rate. After failure of a combination of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, the use of empirical quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole), has been generally used as the optimal second-line therapy. Even after two consecutive failures, several studies have demonstrated that H. pylori eradication can finally be achieved in almost all patients if several "rescue" therapies are consecutively given. It seems that performing culture even after a second eradication failure may not be necessary, as it is possible to construct an overall strategy to maximize H. pylori eradication, based on the different possibilities of empirical treatment (when antibiotic susceptibilities are unknown). Thus, if one does not want to perform culture before the administration of the third treatment after failure of the first two, different empirical treatments exist, including regimens based on: 1, amoxicillin (amoxicillin-PPI at high doses); 2, amoxicillin plus tetracycline (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-amoxicillin, or ranitidine-bismuth-citrate-tetracyline-amoxicillin); 3, rifabutin (rifabutin-amoxicillin-PPI); 4, levofloxacin (levofloxacin-amoxicillin-PPI); and 5, furazolidone (furazolidone-bismuth-tetracycline-PPI).     

Impact of furazolidone-based quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after previous treatment failures

Background. One week of quadruple therapy including metronidazole is recommended for Helicobacter pylori treatment failures after first line therapy regardless of resistance status. This study investigated whether a quadruple regimen containing furazolidone could be effective as a third‐line (salvage) therapy. Methods. All patients with previous H. pylori treatment failure after a clarithromycin‐metronidazole ± amoxicillin combination plus acid suppression were given lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid), tripotassiumdicitratobismuthate 240 mg bid, tetracycline 1 g bid, metronidazole 400 mg (PPI‐B‐T‐M) three times a day (tid) for 1 week. In the case of treatment failure with this second‐line therapy, the same regimen was applied for 1 week except for using furazolidone 200 mg bid (PPI‐B‐T‐F) instead of metronidazole (sequential study design). Results. Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with PPI‐B‐T‐M. Eleven of those 18 remained H. pylori positive (38.9% cured). Pretherapeutic metronidazole resistance was associated with a lower probability of eradication success (10% vs. 75%, p= .04). Ten of these 11 patients agreed to be retreated by PPI‐B‐T‐F. Final cure of H. pylori with PPI‐B‐T‐F was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%) nonresponsive to PPI‐B‐T‐M. Conclusions. In the presence of metronidazole resistance, PPI‐B‐T‐M as a recommended second‐line therapy by the Maastricht consensus conference achieved unacceptable low cure rates in our metronidazole pretreated population. In this population, metronidazole based second‐line quadruple therapy may be best suited in case of a metronidazole‐free first line‐regimen (e.g. PPI‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin) or a low prevalence of metronidazole resistance. Furazolidone in the PPI‐B‐T‐F combination does not have a cross‐resistance potential to metronidazole and is a promising salvage option after a failed PPI‐B‐T‐M regimen.     

Double-dose, new-generation proton pump inhibitors do not improve Helicobacter pylori eradication rate

BACKGROUND: Up to present, omeprazole plus two antibiotics are used for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy . Few studies have compared double-dose new-generation, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) with omeprazole. Therefore, we conducted a randomized, prospective study to evaluate differences in H. pylori eradication rates by PPI type. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2006, 576 consecutive patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled prospectively. Four different PPIs [omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (old generation), or pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (new generation)] were added to clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat analysis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of these four PPIs: 64.9% (omeprazole, n = 148), 69.3% (pantoprazole, n = 140), 69.3% (rabeprazole, n = 140), and 72.9% (esomoprazole, n = 148). When eradication rates were analyzed according to whether patients had an ulcer or not on a per-protocol basis, no difference was found between the eradication rates of the four PPIs. However, side-effects were more common in the esomeprazole-based triple therapy group than in the other groups (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: No convincing evidence was obtained that double-dose new-generation PPIs have better H. pylori eradication rates and tolerability than omeprazole.     

One-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin for eradication of persistent Helicobacter pylori resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

Aim: To investigate a 1‐week once‐daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin for rescue therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 103) with at least one previous treatment failure and H. pylori infection resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg, and rifabutin 300 mg, given once daily for 7 days. Eradication was confirmed by histology and culture. CYP2C19 status was determined by polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results: Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates were 77.7% (68.4–85.3) and 83.3% (74.4–90.2). Five patients discontinued prematurely (4.8%). Eradication was achieved in 93.1% of poor/intermediate metabolizers and in 78.8% of homozygous extensive metabolizers (p = .14). Eradication rates in patients with one, two, three, and four or more previous failures were 78.3%, 89.6%, 68.6%, and 88.9%, respectively (p = .21). The regimen was effective in seven of nine patients who previously failed quadruple therapy. Post‐treatment resistance to moxifloxacin and rifabutin was detected in two (12.5%) and five (31%) patients after treatment failure. Conclusion: Once‐daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin is a promising, safe, and convenient regimen for rescue therapy of H. pylori infection that may serve as a valuable alternative to quadruple therapy, particularly for patients with intolerance to amoxicillin.     

Failure of Helicobacter pylori Treatment After Regimes Containing Clarithromycin: New Practical Therapeutic Options

Failure of Helicobacter pylori treatment is a growing problem in daily practice. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of two new regimes as second‐line options in a randomized and prospective study. Methods: Patients in whom a first eradication regime containing clarithromycin had failed were included. After performing gastroscopy and a 13C‐urea breath test (UBT), the patients were randomized to receive a combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 500 mg of levofloxacin, and 200 mg (two tablets) of furazolidone administered once daily for 10 days (RLF) or the combination of 20 mg of rabeprazole, 120 mg (two tablets) of bismuth subcitrate, 100 mg of doxycycline, and 200 mg of furazolidone, administered twice daily for 10 days (RBDF). Clinical examinations and new UBT were performed 60 days after therapy. Results: Sixty patients were included (mean age, 46 years, 57% females). Two patients were excluded: one because of adverse effects and another as a result of protocol violation. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all medications correctly). Side‐effects (96% mild) were observed in 87% of the patients and were comparable between groups, except diarrhea, which was more frequent in group RLF (p= .025). Intention‐to‐treat cure rates were 77% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62–93%) in the RLF group and 83% (95% CI: 68–97%) in the RBDF group (p= .750). Per‐protocol cure rates were 80% (95% CI: 65–95%) in the RLF group and 82% (95% CI: 67–96%) in the RBDF group (p= 1.0). Conclusions: Both once‐daily triple (rabeprazole, levofloxacin, and furazolidone) and twice‐daily quadruple therapy (rabeprazole, bismuth subcitrate, doxycycline, and furazolidone) for 10 days achieved encouraging results. Subsequent studies should be performed to evaluate antibiotic resistance, doses, dosing intervals, duration of treatment, and safety of these two regimes.     

The TETRA study: a prospective evaluation of Helicobacter pylori 'test-and-treat' strategy on 736 patients in clinical practice

AIMS: To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the test-and-treat strategy in a large group of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, < 45 years, without alarm symptoms, were prospectively studied. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with the 13C-urea-breath-test, and eradication or symptomatic treatment was prescribed accordingly. 'Symptomatic improvement' was defined as the percentage of patients with a decrease of > or = 2 levels in the dyspepsia-severity-score or with no symptoms after treatment. Health status and use of health resources were also assessed. Endoscopy was performed in therapeutic failures. RESULTS: Out of 736 patients initially included, 422 received eradication, and 314 symptomatic therapy; 87% returned at 6 weeks and 67% at 6 months. At 6 months, 'symptomatic improvement' was achieved in 73% and 54% of the patients, in eradication and symptomatic groups, respectively (p < .001), and overall in 66%. A reduction of 78% in mean self-assessment visual analogical score was observed at 6 months. More than 50% of patients were 'much better' at control visits. Endoscopy (18%) and physician's visits (13%) were the main health resources used. No gastric or oesophageal cancer was diagnosed. CONCLUSION: This large prospective study shows that the test-and-treat strategy is effective and safe for management of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.     

Comparison of amoxicillin-metronidazole plus famotidine or lansoprazole for amoxicillin-clarithromycin-proton pump inhibitor treatment failures for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-metronidazole is recommended as second-line Helicobacter pylori therapy in Japan. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of second-line eradication using the H2-receptor antagonist famotidine as a substitute for proton pump inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients who failed in first-line H. pylori eradication using proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin were randomly assigned to either second-line therapy including metronidazole: a 7-day course of lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and metronidazole 250 mg, b.i.d. (lansoprazole group); or a 7-day course of famotidine 40 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and metronidazole 250 mg, b.i.d. (famotidine group). Eradication was assessed for each group at least 4 weeks after completing eradication therapy. Drug susceptibility test was performed using 57 strains in pretreatment to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin. RESULTS: Prior to second-line H. pylori eradication, the rate of resistance to clarithromycin was high at 84% (48/57). Similarly, resistance to metronidazole was low at 5.3% (3/57); however, no amoxicillin-resistant strains were found. The eradication rates for both lansoprazole and famotidine treatment groups were high at 97% (29/30) and 94% (29/31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine treatment including metronidazole-amoxicillin as second-line therapy provided a high eradication rate similar to lansoprazole therapy. Famotidine is therefore expected to serve as a useful H. pylori eradication regimen in patients with proton pump inhibitor allergy, an economic benefit in terms of reduced health-care costs is also anticipated.     

A new modified concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Turkey

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have tended to decrease recently, mostly due to antibiotic resistance. In the present study, our aim was to determine Hp eradication rate with the LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen and the secondary objective of this study was to identify an effective regimen for our population. Methods: Eighty‐four Hp‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were assigned into the same group. Patients were administered the classical LAC protocole (lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid and claritromycin 500 mg bid for 14 days) plus metronidazole 500 mg tid for 14 days. Gastroscopy and histopathological assessment were performed before enrollment and C¹⁴ urea breath test and stool antigen test were performed 6 weeks after treatment. Results: All 84 patients completed the study. No patient left the study because of drug side effect. Total eradication rate was 75% (63/84). Conclusion: Although LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen achieved a much better eradication rate compared with the standard LAC regimen; this is the first study that has a relatively low success with a concomitant therapy. So in areas of high resistance like Turkey, one cannot expect a high success with any clarithromycin containing regimen and those should be avoided.     

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Regimens Containing Clarithromycin, Metronidazole, and Amoxicillin Among Histologic Subgroups for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in a Developing Country

Background: Most treatments deemed effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in developed countries are less effective in developing countries. Regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin seem efficacious despite antibiotic resistance, and may be a viable option in developing countries. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of a 14‐day regimen with 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 500 mg metronidazole t.i.d., and 500 mg amoxicillin t.i.d. (with and without a proton pump inhibitor), and a 10‐day regimen containing 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 1 g amoxicillin b.i.d., and 20 mg omeprazole b.i.d. in Pasto, Colombia, using a randomized, single‐blind design stratified by presence of atrophic gastritis. Results: H. pylori was eradicated in 86.8% and 85.3% of the participants randomized to a clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin and clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimens, respectively (p = .79). Per‐protocol analyses indicated greater efficacy for the clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin regimen (97%) versus the clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimen (86%) (p = .04), particularly for participants with atrophic gastritis (clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin = 100%, clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole = 81%; p = .02). Adverse events were mild, but adverse event‐related non‐compliance was reported more often for regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an eradication rate of > 85% can be achieved with 14‐day clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin and 10‐day clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimens in Pasto, Colombia. The regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin appear to be superior to the clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimen for compliant participants and those with atrophic gastritis. Our findings provide treatment options for a population in a developing country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infections and antibiotic resistance.     

Recent use of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for the eradication of H pylori: a broad data review

Introduction. For the eradication of Helicobacter pylori a 1‐week triple therapy combining proton pump inhibitors with two antibiotics has been recommended as a gold standard therapy. However, a recent broad data review on the efficacy of the different regimens is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the recent literature. Methods. We undertook a broad data review of the efficacy of nine different 7‐day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole) in its standard dosage and two antibiotics. Relevant original papers on H. pylori eradication in adults, published in English or German between 1995 and 2000, were identified from MEDLINE searches. Studies were reviewed and selected according to predefined criteria. Results. Our predefined criteria were fulfilled by 79 full paper articles including 112 study arms with 8383 patients on intention‐to‐treat, or 6787 patients on per‐protocol basis, respectively. The mean eradication rates unweighted or weighted by the number of patients in the study arm vary from 71.9% to 83.8% for intention‐to‐treat analysis and from 78.5% to 91.2% for per‐protocol analysis. Conclusions. All nine PPI based triple therapy regimens are very effective in H. pylori eradication. The current literature review underlines that the use of either lansoprazole, omeprazole, or pantoprazole combined with two antibiotics yield similar high eradication rates.     

Levofloxacin- vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate-containing therapy after H. pylori treatment failure

AIM: Ranitidine bismuth citrate and levofloxacin-based regimen may be an alternative to quadruple therapy after Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. Our aim was to compare two 7-day triple second-line regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate or levofloxacin. METHODS: Patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin had failed were randomized to receive 7-day treatment with: 1, ranitidine bismuth citrate (400 mg b.i.d.), tetracycline (500 mg q.i.d.), and metronidazole (250 mg q.i.d.), or 2, levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.), and omeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: One-hundred patients were included: 50 received the ranitidine bismuth citrate regimen, and 50 the levofloxacin one. Groups were comparable in terms of demographic variables. Two percent of the patients (one in each group) did not return for follow up. Compliance was similar in both groups (90% took all the medications correctly). Side-effects (only mild/moderate) in the two groups were also comparable (38% with ranitidine bismuth citrate and 36% with levofloxacin). Per-protocol cure rates were 69% (95% CI = 54-80%) in the ranitidine bismuth citrate group, and 71% (57-82%) in the levofloxacin one. Intention-to-treat cure rates were, respectively, 68% (59-79%) and 68% (59-79%) (nonstatistically significant differences). CONCLUSIONS: Both 7-day ranitidine bismuth citrate- and levofloxacin-containing second-line regimens represent alternatives to quadruple therapy in patients with previous omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin failure.     

Meta-analysis: Four-Drug, Three-Antibiotic, Non-bismuth-Containing "Concomitant Therapy" Versus Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: Low success rates with triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections have prompted search for alternatives. In one, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin was followed by the PPI plus clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (sequential therapy); in another, these four drugs were given concomitantly (concomitant therapy).
Aim: To compare concomitant therapy with standard triple therapy for H. pylori infection.
Methods: By searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and abstracts of major gastrointestinal meeting, two independent reviewers systemically identified randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing concomitant quadruple to standard triple therapies as well as studies reporting eradication rates of concomitant quadruple therapy in treatment of H. pylori . Pooled eradication rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and univariable metaregression analysis for all extracted variables was conducted.
Results: We identified nine studies (10 treatment arms) including five qualifying RCTs (576 subjects) comparing concomitant (293 subjects, duration 3 to 5 days) and triple therapy (283 subjects, duration 5 to 10 days) and four other studies evaluating concomitant therapy (478 subjects, duration 3 to 7 days). Pooled estimates of the five RCTs showed superiority of concomitant therapy over triple therapy; with intention-to-treat) pooled OR of 2.86 (95% CI: 1.73–4.73) and per-protocol (PP) pooled OR of 3.52 (95% CI: 1.95–6.38). Considering all 10 treatment arms, the ITT eradication rate was 89.7% (95% CI: 86.8–92.1%) and PP was 92.9% (95% CI: 90.2–94.8%).
Conclusion: Concomitant therapy appears to be an effective alternative to triple therapy and is less complex than sequential therapy.     

Comparison of two management strategies for Helicobacter pylori treatment: clinical study and cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND: First-line proton pump inhibitor-based triple and quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication present similar levels of efficacy. Cross-over treatment (quadruple following triple failure, and triple following quadruple failure) seems the most sensible approach to treatment failures, but the two strategies -'quadruple first' versus 'triple first'- have not been previously compared. The aims of our study were to assess the usefulness and the cost-effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine out of 344 patients included in a previous study comparing triple therapy - 7 days of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin twice a day - with quadruple therapy - 7 days of omeprazole twice a day, plus tetracycline, metronidazole and bismuth subcitrate three times a day - failed initial treatment and were assigned to cross-over therapy. Cure was determined by urea breath test. A decision analysis was performed to compare the two eradication strategies. RESULTS: Intention to treat cure rates were 46% (10/22 patients; 95% CI 24-68%) for second-line triple therapy and 63% (17/27 patients; 95% CI 42-81%) for second-line quadruple therapy. Per protocol cure rates were 71% and 85%, respectively. Intention to treat cure rates were 87% (95% CI 81-92%) for the 'triple first' versus 86% (95% CI 80-91%) for the 'quadruple first' strategy (p = .87). The 'quadruple first' strategy was more cost-effective. The incremental cost of 'triple first' strategy per person was 19 in the low-cost area and 65 US dollars in the high-cost area. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of 'triple first' and 'quadruple first' strategies is similar, although the latter seems slightly more cost-effective.     

三联疗法抗幽门螺杆菌感染对儿童肠道菌群状态的影响

目的　探讨抗幽门螺杆菌治疗对儿童肠道菌群状态的影响。方法　分别称取18例幽门螺杆菌感染儿童治疗前后新鲜粪便1.0 g,对肠道菌群中最有代表性的3种需氧菌(肠杆菌、肠球菌和酵母菌)和4种厌氧菌(双歧杆菌、乳杆菌、类杆菌和产气荚膜梭菌) ,分别进行需氧和厌氧培养,菌落计数,同时计算B/ E值来代表定植抗力。结果　抗Hp治疗后,双歧杆菌、乳杆菌和类杆菌较治疗前明显降低( P<0 .0 5 ) ,B/ E值明显下降( P<0 .0 1) ,肠杆菌数量明显增加( P<0 .0 5 ) ,酵母菌的检出率明显增加( P<0 .0 5 )。结论　三联疗法抗Hp治疗对儿童肠道菌群产生明显的影响,因此在治疗Hp感染时须考虑到大量抗生素治疗后可能对患儿产生的副作用及潜在的危险     

Results from the pediatric European register for treatment of Helicobacter pylori (PERTH)

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data on the eradication treatment for childhood Helicobacter pylori are scanty. A register was established on the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) website to collect data on treatment performed by European pediatricians to ascertain what is practiced in the field. SUBJECTS: From January 2001 to December 2002, information on 597 children were entered by 23 European Centers, but only data of 518 treated children were completed and analyzed (86.7%, 262 male subjects, median age 9 years, range 1-14). According to their nationality, 226 children were from Southern Europe, 132 from Eastern Europe, 68 from Western Europe, and 4 from northern Europe, 68 from North Africa, and 20 from Asia. At endoscopy, 454 children had gastritis and 64 had ulcer (12.3%). Antibiotic sensitivity, tested in 361 cases, revealed 18% clarithromycin-resistant and 19% metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains. RESULTS: Treatment was performed for 1 week in 388 and for 2 weeks in 130 children. Antibiotics were associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in 345 and with bismuth in 121 children. Triple therapy was given to 485 children, dual therapy to 26, quadruple to 7. Follow-up data, by (13)C-Urea-Breath Test or histology or both, were available for 480 children. Overall eradication rate was 65.6%, significantly higher in children with ulcer (79.7%) than without (63.9%, p = .001). When given as first treatment, bismuth-containing triple therapies were more efficacious than PPI-containing ones (77% versus 64%, p = .02, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Twenty-seven different treatment regimens were used, but only six were administered to at least 18 children (range 18-157). There was no difference between treatments given for 1 or 2 weeks, or given as first or second therapies. CONCLUSION: European pediatricians entering data in the register used 27 different regimens. Bismuth-containing therapies resulted in higher eradication rate. Omeprazole-containing triple therapies were the most used although their efficacy was low. Therapies recommended for adults do not appear to be suitable for children.