Phage selection for site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins in vivo.

The development of a method for the site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins in vivo would significantly facilitate studies of the cellular function of proteins, as well as make possible the synthesis of proteins with novel structures and activities. Our approach to this problem consists of the generation of amber suppressor tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase pairs that are not catalytically competent with all the endogenous Escherichia coli tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, followed by directed evolution of such orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to alter their amino acid specificities. To evolve the desired amino acid specificity, a direct selection for site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into a reporter epitope displayed on the surface of M13 phage has been developed and characterized. Under simulated selection conditions, phage particles displaying aspartate were enriched over 300-fold from a pool of phage displaying asparagine using monoclonal antibodies raised against the aspartate-containing epitope. The direct phage selection offers high specificity for the amino acid of interest, eliminating the potential for contamination with synthetases active towards wild-type amino acids in multiple rounds of selection.     

Editing of errors in selection of amino acids for protein synthesis.

All living cells must conduct protein synthesis with a high degree of accuracy maintained in the transmission and flow of information from gene to finished protein product. One crucial "quality control" point in maintaining a high level of accuracy is the selectivity by which aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases furnish correctly activated amino acids, attached to tRNA species, as the building blocks for growing protein chains. During selection of amino acids, synthetases very often have to distinguish the cognate substrate from a homolog having just one fewer methyl group in its structure. The binding energy of a methyl group is estimated to contribute only a factor of 100 to the specificity of binding, yet synthetases distinguish such closely related amino acids with a discrimination factor of 10,000 to 100,000. Examples of this include methionine versus homocysteine, isoleucine versus valine, alanine versus glycine, and threonine versus serine. Many investigators have demonstrated in vitro the ability of certain aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to edit, that is, correct or prevent incorrect attachment of amino acids to tRNA molecules. Several major editing pathways are now established from in vitro data. Further, at least some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have recently been shown to carry out the editing function in vivo. Editing has been demonstrated to occur in both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Significant energy is expended by the cell for editing of misactivated amino acids, which can be reflected in the growth rate. Because of this, cellular levels of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, as well as amino acid biosynthetic pathways which yield competing substrates for protein synthesis, must be carefully regulated to prevent excessive editing. High-level expression of recombinant proteins imposes a strain on the biosynthetic capacity of the cell which frequently results in misincorporation of abnormal or wrong amino acids owing in part to limited editing by synthetases. Unbalanced amino acid pools associated with some genetic disorders in humans may also lead to errors in tRNA aminoacylation. The availability of X-ray crystallographic structures of some synthetases, combined with site-directed mutagenesis, allows insights into molecular details of the extraordinary selectivity of synthetases, including the editing function.     

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: versatile players in the changing theater of translation

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases attach amino acids to the 3' termini of cognate tRNAs to establish the specificity of protein synthesis. A recent Asilomar conference (California, January 13-18, 2002) discussed new research into the structure-function relationship of these crucial enzymes, as well as a multitude of novel functions, including participation in amino acid biosynthesis, cell cycle control, RNA splicing, and export of tRNAs from nucleus to cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. Together with the discovery of their role in the cellular synthesis of proteins to incorporate selenocysteine and pyrrolysine, these diverse functions of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases underscore the flexibility and adaptability of these ancient enzymes and stimulate the development of new concepts and methods for expanding the genetic code.     

氨酰tRNA合成酶的分子网络和功能

氨酰tRNA合成酶是生命进化过程中最早出现的一类蛋白质,氨酰tRNA合成酶帮助氨基酸转移到相应的tRNA上,进而参与蛋白质的合成保证了生命体的严谨性和多样性.随着后基因组时代的到来,氨酰tRNA合成酶的结构和功能成为新的研究热点.结构生物学和生物信息学的研究结果表明,氨酰tRNA合成酶在真核生物体内以多聚复合物的形式行使功能,形成复杂的分子网络体系.最新的实验证据显示,氨酰tRNA合成酶不但是蛋白质合成过程中一类最重要的酶,而且参与了转录、翻译水平的调控、RNA剪接、信号传导和免疫应答等众多生命活动.     

Assembly of a class I tRNA synthetase from products of an artificially split gene

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases arose early in evolution and established the rules of the genetic code through their specific interactions with amino acids and RNA molecules. About half of these tRNA charging enzymes are class I synthetases, which contain similar N-terminal nucleotide-fold-like structures that are joined to variable domains implicated in specific protein-tRNA contacts. Here, we show that a bacterial synthetase gene can be split into two nonoverlapping segments. We split the gene for Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase (a class I synthetase) at several sites near the interdomain junction, such that one segment codes for the nucleotide-fold-containing domain and the other provides determinants for tRNA recognition. When the segments are folded together, they can recognize and charge tRNA, both in vivo and in vitro. We postulate that an early step in the assembly of systems to attach amino acids to specific RNA molecules may have involved specific interactions between discrete proteins that is reflected in the interdomain contacts of modern synthetases.     

Incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins

Chemical and biological diversity of protein structures and functions can be widely expanded by position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids carrying a variety of specialty side groups. After the pioneering works of Schultz's group and Chamberlin's group in 1989, noticeable progress has been made in expanding types of amino acids, in finding novel methods of tRNA aminoacylation and in extending genetic codes for directing the positions. Aminoacylation of tRNA with non-natural amino acids has been achieved by directed evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases or some ribozymes. Codons have been extended to include four-base codons or non-natural base pairs. Multiple incorporation of different non-natural amino acids has been achieved by the use of a different four-base codon for each tRNA. The combination of these novel techniques has opened the possibility of synthesising non-natural mutant proteins in living cells.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶的研究进展

氨酰-tRNA合成酶催化特异的氨基酸与同源tRNA氨酰化,从而保证了遗传密码翻译的忠实性。这些古老而保守的蛋白质分子除了具有酶的功能外,在哺乳动物细胞中还发现了多种其他功能,具有重要的应用价值。在寻找具有全新作用机制的新抗生素以应对日益严重的抗生素耐药现象过程中,氨酰-tRNA合成酶是细菌蛋白质合成过程中重要的、新颖的靶标,成为关注的重点。定向突变的氨酰-tRNA合成酶可以用来定点掺入非天然氨基酸,扩展蛋白质工程。今后,随着人们对氨酰-tRNA合成酶研究的不断深入,它们还可能用来治疗肿瘤等多种疾病。     

Interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases with amino acids

The review deals with interactions of the key enzymes of the protein biosynthesis-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (EC 6.1.1.) with amino acids and their analogues, considering the contribution of different groups in the process of specific complex formation and catalysis. The important role of alpha-amino group of amino acid in the enzyme recognition has been revealed. Modification of the carboxylic group does not change significantly the analogues complex formation with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. However this group is essential for amino acid rearrangement in the specific complex with the enzyme. The structural organization of the enzyme binding sites specific for amino acids and the enzyme interaction with the analogues of aminoacyladenylates are discussed.     

Docking of tryptophanyl [corrected tryptophan] analogs to trytophanyl-tRNA synthetase: implications for non-canonical amino acid incorporations

Abstract Non-canonical amino acids (N(AA)), as building blocks for peptides and proteins during ribosomal translation, represent a nearly infinite supply of novel functions. The specific selection, activation and tRNA-charging of amino acids by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) in the aminoacylation reaction are essential steps. In most cases, aminoacylation of N(AA) is a good indication that the related amino acid will participate in ribosomal translation as well. However, testing the translational capacity of amino acid analogs has technical limitations. Therefore, a rapid and reliable in silico test for N(AA) recognition by AARS would be advantageous in experimental design. We chose tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli as a model system for docking studies with various tryptophan analogs using the FlexX-Pharm strategy. We were able to calculate relative binding energies for Trp analogs in TrpRS that correlate well with their translational activities in E. coli. In particular, FlexX-Pharm predicted the binding sites of fluoro-, amino-, hydroxyl- and aza-containing Trp analogs within 1.5 A of Trp in the homology model of E. coli TrpRS. Therefore, the use of ligand docking prior to N(AA) incorporation experiments might provide a straightforward means for determining N(AA) that can be efficiently incorporated into a protein.     

Multiple incorporation of non-natural amino acids into a single protein using tRNAs with non-standard structures

The ability to introduce non-natural amino acids into proteins opens up new vistas for the study of protein structure and function. This approach requires suppressor tRNAs that deliver the non-natural amino acid to a ribosome associated with an mRNA containing an expanded codon. The suppressor tRNAs must be absolutely protected from aminoacylation by any of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in the protein synthesizing system, or a natural amino acid will be incorporated instead of the non-natural amino acid. Here, we found that some tRNAs with non-standard structures could work as efficient four-base suppressors fulfilling the above orthogonal conditions. Using these tRNAs, we successfully demonstrated incorporation of three different non-natural amino acids into a single protein.     

Genetic perturbations of RNA reveal structure-based recognition in protein-RNA interaction

Protein-RNA recognition is an essential foundation of cellular processes, yet much remains unknown about these important interactions. The recognition between aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their cognate tRNA substrates is highly specific and essential for cell viability, due to the necessity for accurate translation of the genetic code into protein sequences. We selected an active tRNA that is highly mutated in the recognition nucleotides of the acceptor stem region in the alanine system. The functional properties of this mutant and its secondary derivatives demonstrate that recognition cannot be reduced to isolated structural elements, but rather the amino acid acceptor stem is being recognized as a unit.     

Structural and mechanistic basis of pre- and posttransfer editing by leucyl-tRNA synthetase

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases link tRNAs with their cognate amino acid. In some cases, their fidelity relies on hydrolytic editing that destroys incorrectly activated amino acids or mischarged tRNAs. We present structures of leucyl-tRNA synthetase complexed with analogs of the distinct pre- and posttransfer editing substrates. The editing active site binds the two different substrates using a single amino acid discriminatory pocket while preserving the same mode of adenine recognition. This suggests a similar mechanism of hydrolysis for both editing substrates that depends on a key, completely conserved aspartic acid, which interacts with the alpha-amino group of the noncognate amino acid and positions both substrates for hydrolysis. Our results demonstrate the economy by which a single active site accommodates two distinct substrates in a proofreading process critical to the fidelity of protein synthesis.     

On the evolution of structure in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are one of the major protein components in the translation machinery. These essential proteins are found in all forms of life and are responsible for charging their cognate tRNAs with the correct amino acid. The evolution of the tRNA synthetases is of fundamental importance with respect to the nature of the biological cell and the transition from an RNA world to the modern world dominated by protein-enzymes. We present a structure-based phylogeny of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. By using structural alignments of all of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases of known structure in combination with a new measure of structural homology, we have reconstructed the evolutionary history of these proteins. In order to derive unbiased statistics from the structural alignments, we introduce a multidimensional QR factorization which produces a nonredundant set of structures. Since protein structure is more highly conserved than protein sequence, this study has allowed us to glimpse the evolution of protein structure that predates the root of the universal phylogenetic tree. The extensive sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of the tRNA synthetases (Woese et al., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:202-236, 2000) has further enabled us to reconstruct the complete evolutionary profile of these proteins and to make connections between major evolutionary events and the resulting changes in protein shape. We also discuss the effect of functional specificity on protein shape over the complex evolutionary course of the tRNA synthetases.     

Class-specific binding of two aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to annexin, a Ca2+- and phospholipid-binding protein

Annexins are a family of Ca2+/phospholipid-binding proteins that have diverse functions. To understand the function of annexin in Physarum polycephalum, we searched for its binding proteins. Here we demonstrate the presence of two novel annexin-binding proteins. The homology search of partial amino acid sequences of these two proteins identified them as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs). Furthermore, antibody against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases cross-reacted with one of two proteins. Our results imply the interaction between intracellular membrane dynamics and protein translation system, and may give a clue to understand the mechanism of some myositis diseases, which have been known to produce autoantibodies against ARSs.     

Structural Phylogenomics Retrodicts the Origin of the Genetic Code and Uncovers the Evolutionary Impact of Protein Flexibility

The genetic code shapes the genetic repository. Its origin has puzzled molecular scientists for over half a century and remains a long-standing mystery. Here we show that the origin of the genetic code is tightly coupled to the history of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes and their interactions with tRNA. A timeline of evolutionary appearance of protein domain families derived from a structural census in hundreds of genomes reveals the early emergence of the ‘operational’ RNA code and the late implementation of the standard genetic code. The emergence of codon specificities and amino acid charging involved tight coevolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and tRNA structures as well as episodes of structural recruitment. Remarkably, amino acid and dipeptide compositions of single-domain proteins appearing before the standard code suggest archaic synthetases with structures homologous to catalytic domains of tyrosyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases were capable of peptide bond formation and aminoacylation. Results reveal that genetics arose through coevolutionary interactions between polypeptides and nucleic acid cofactors as an exacting mechanism that favored flexibility and folding of the emergent proteins. These enhancements of phenotypic robustness were likely internalized into the emerging genetic system with the early rise of modern protein structure.     

Modulation of substrate specificity within the amino acid editing site of leucyl-tRNA synthetase

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases covalently link transfer RNAs to their cognate amino acids. Some of the tRNA synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to ensure fidelity in this first step of protein synthesis. The amino acid editing site for leucyl- (LeuRS) and isoleucyl- (IleRS) tRNA synthetases reside within homologous CP1 domains. In each case, a threonine-rich peptide and a second conserved GTG region that are separated by about 100 amino acids comprise parts of the hydrolytic editing site. While a number of sites are conserved between these two enzymes and likely confer a commonality to the mechanisms, some positions are idiosyncratic to LeuRS or IleRS. Herein, we provide evidence that a conserved arginine and threonine at respective sites in LeuRS and IleRS diverged to confer amino acid substrate recognition. This site complements other sites in the amino acid binding pocket of the editing active site of Escherichia coli LeuRS, including Thr252 and Val338, which collectively fine-tune amino acid specificity to confer fidelity.     

On the Evolution of Structure in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are one of the major protein components in the translation machinery. These essential proteins are found in all forms of life and are responsible for charging their cognate tRNAs with the correct amino acid. The evolution of the tRNA synthetases is of fundamental importance with respect to the nature of the biological cell and the transition from an RNA world to the modern world dominated by protein-enzymes. We present a structure-based phylogeny of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. By using structural alignments of all of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases of known structure in combination with a new measure of structural homology, we have reconstructed the evolutionary history of these proteins. In order to derive unbiased statistics from the structural alignments, we introduce a multidimensional QR factorization which produces a nonredundant set of structures. Since protein structure is more highly conserved than protein sequence, this study has allowed us to glimpse the evolution of protein structure that predates the root of the universal phylogenetic tree. The extensive sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of the tRNA synthetases (Woese et al., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64:202-236, 2000) has further enabled us to reconstruct the complete evolutionary profile of these proteins and to make connections between major evolutionary events and the resulting changes in protein shape. We also discuss the effect of functional specificity on protein shape over the complex evolutionary course of the tRNA synthetases.