The "closed loop model" in controlling mRNA translation during development

Translational control is particularly important in situations where the correlation of a distinct mRNA and the abundance of the corresponding protein might be low. This is the case for instance during oocyte maturation, shortly before the GVBD when the chromatin is condensed, until the embryonic genome is activated. In these situations, gene expression relies on the activation of maternal mRNAs which were stored stably in a dormant form. The most sophisticated model for translational initiation at present is the so-called "closed loop" model, where a circularization of the mRNA is mediated by associated 5'-cap- and 3'-poly(A) binding proteins. Depending on differential interactions, this event can result in translational stimulation or repression. Several studies describe correlated regulation mechanisms in model organisms like mouse or Xenopus, but data addressing translational regulation in farm animals are rare. Cytoplasmic mRNA activating or repressing factors, however, might contribute to achieve developmental competence in bovine or porcine oocytes. Recently we showed that, in the pig, embryonic signals can modify essential components of the mRNA-5'-translation initiation complex in the uterine luminal epithelium at the time of implantation. In accordance with the closed loop model of translational initiation, this review focuses on the regulatory impact of 5'-mRNA end associated proteins (components of the mRNA-cap binding complex) and 3'-end associated proteins (components of the poly(A) binding complex) during in vitro maturation of cattle and pig oocytes, early embryonic development and in the pig uterine epithelia.     

Interaction of proteins with the mRNA for ribosomal protein L1 in Xenopus: structural characterization of in vivo complexes and identification of proteins that bind in vitro to its 5'UTR.

Xenopus r-protein mRNAs are known to be coordinately regulated at the translational level. To find out if RNA/protein interactions are involved in this control mechanism, we have characterized the particles containing the translationally repressed rp-mRNA and we have investigated the proteins that specifically bind to this type of mRNA. By sedimentation analysis and isopycnic centrifugation we have found that the repressed rp-mRNAs are assembled in slow sedimenting complexes where the RNA is prevalent over the protein mass (2.3 to 1). This composition is maintained also after in vitro reconstitution of the particle. We carried out also a detailed analysis of in vitro RNA/protein complex formation by focusing our attention on the 5'UTR, very similar in different rp-mRNAs and important in the translational regulation. We describe specific interactions of L1 mRNA with four proteins. The binding site of two of them, 57 kD and 47 kD, is in the typical pyrimidine sequence at the 5' end and is position dependent. Proteins of the same size interact also with the analogous region of r-protein S1 and L14 mRNA, not with unrelated RNAs. Binding of two other proteins, 31 kD and 24 kD, in the downstream region of the 5'UTR was also observed. The most evident 57 kD protein has been partially purified. Although the binding of these proteins to the r-protein mRNA 5'UTR is specific, their involvement in the translation regulation remains to be proved.     

Structural and functional control of the eukaryotic mRNA decapping machinery

The regulation of mRNA degradation is critical for proper gene expression. Many major pathways for mRNA decay involve the removal of the 5′ 7-methyl guanosine (m⁷G) cap in the cytoplasm to allow for 5′-to-3′ exonucleolytic decay. The most well studied and conserved eukaryotic decapping enzyme is Dcp2, and its function is aided by co-factors and decapping enhancers. A subset of these factors can act to enhance the catalytic activity of Dcp2, while others might stimulate the remodeling of proteins bound to the mRNA substrate that may otherwise inhibit decapping. Structural studies have provided major insights into the mechanisms by which Dcp2 and decapping co-factors activate decapping. Additional mRNA decay factors can function by recruiting components of the decapping machinery to target mRNAs. mRNA decay factors, decapping factors, and mRNA substrates can be found in cytoplasmic foci named P bodies that are conserved in eukaryotes, though their function remains unknown. In addition to Dcp2, other decapping enzymes have been identified, which may serve to supplement the function of Dcp2 or act in independent decay or quality control pathways. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA Decay mechanisms.     

Translational regulation by mRNA/protein interactions in eukaryotic cells: Ferritin and beyond

The expression of certain eukaryotic genes is – at least in part – controlled at the level of mRNA translation. The step of translational initiation represents the primary target for regulation. The regulation of the intracellular iron storage protein ferritin in response to iron levels provides a good example of translational control by a reversible RNA/protein interaction in the 5' untranslated region of an mRNA. We consider mechanisms by which mRNA/protein interactions may impede translation initiation and discuss recent data suggesting that the ferritin example may represent the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of a more general theme for translational control.     

Differential regulation of rat liver selenoprotein mRNAs in selenium deficiency.

Selenium deficiency causes a fall in the concentrations of selenoproteins but selenoprotein P and type I iodothyronine 5'-deiodinase (5'-deiodinase) are more resistant to this effect than is glutathione peroxidase. To investigate the differential regulation of these selenoproteins, a selenium-deficient diet was fed to weanling rats for 14.5 weeks and their hepatic mRNAs were measured by Northern analysis. Levels of all 3 mRNAs fell progressively with time. Selenoprotein P and 5'-deiodinase mRNAs remained higher at all time points relative to control than glutathione peroxidase mRNA. mRNA decreases were mirrored by decreases in glutathione peroxidase activity and selenoprotein P concentration. However, the decreases in the protein levels were greater than the decreases in their mRNAs, suggesting that synthesis of both proteins was limited to a similar extent at the translational level by the availability of selenium. In addition to this apparently unregulated translational effect, these results point to a pretranslational regulation, affecting mRNA levels, which could account for the differential effect of selenium deficiency on glutathione peroxidase and the other selenoproteins. This regulation might serve to direct selenium to selenoprotein P and 5'-deiodinase when limited amounts of the element are available.     

GPCR signalling to the translation machinery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in most physiological processes, many of them being engaged in fully differentiated cells. These receptors couple to transducers of their own, primarily G proteins and β-arrestins, which launch intracellular signalling cascades. Some of these signalling events regulate the translational machinery to fine-tune general cell metabolism or to alter protein expression pattern. Though extensively documented for tyrosine kinase receptors, translational regulation by GPCRs is still poorly appreciated. The objective of this review paper is to address the following questions: i) is there a “GPCR signature” impacting on the translational machinery, and ultimately on the type of mRNA translated? ii) are the regulatory networks involved similar as those utilized by tyrosine kinase receptors? In particular, we will discuss the specific features of translational control mediated by GPCRs and highlight the intrinsic properties of GPCRs these mechanisms could rely on.     

Cyclin B1 mRNA translation is temporally controlled through formation and disassembly of RNA granules

Temporal control of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation is an important mechanism for regulating cellular, neuronal, and developmental processes. However, mechanisms that coordinate timing of translational activation remain largely unresolved. Full-grown oocytes arrest meiosis at prophase I and deposit dormant mRNAs. Of these, translational control of cyclin B1 mRNA in response to maturation-inducing hormone is important for normal progression of oocyte maturation, through which oocytes acquire fertility. In this study, we found that dormant cyclin B1 mRNA forms granules in the cytoplasm of zebrafish and mouse oocytes. Real-time imaging of translation revealed that the granules disassemble at the time of translational activation during maturation. Formation of cyclin B1 RNA granules requires binding of the mRNA to Pumilio1 protein and depends on actin filaments. Disruption of cyclin B1 RNA granules accelerated the timing of their translational activation after induction of maturation, whereas stabilization hindered translational activation. Thus, our results suggest that RNA granule formation is critical for the regulation of timing of translational activation.     

In vitro studies reveal that different modes of initiation on HIV-1 mRNA have different levels of requirement for eukaryotic initiation factor 4F

Expression of the two isoforms p55 and p40 of HIV-1 Gag proteins relies on distinct translation initiation mechanisms, a cap-dependent initiation and two internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs). The regulation of these processes is complex and remains poorly understood. This study was focused on the influence of the 5'-UTR and on the requirement for the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4F complex components. By using an in?vitro system, we showed substantial involvement of the 5'-UTR in the control of p55 expression. This highly structured 5'-UTR requires the eIF4F complex, especially RNA helicase eIF4A, which mediates initiation at the authentic AUG codon. In addition, the 5'-UTR regulates expression in an RNA concentration-dependent manner, with a high concentration of RNA triggering specific reduction of full-length Gag p55 production. HIV-1 genomic RNA also has the ability to use a strong IRES element located in the gag coding region. We show that this mechanism is particularly efficient, and that activity of this IRES is only poorly dependent on RNA helicase eIF4A when the viral 5'-UTR is removed. HIV-1 genomic mRNA exhibits in?vitro translational features that allow the expression of Gag p55 protein by different mechanisms that involve different requirements for eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. This suggests that HIV-1 could adapt to its mode of translation according to the availability of the initiation factors in the infected cell.     

Regulation of RNA granules by FMRP and implications for neurological diseases

RNA granule formation, which can be regulated by RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs) such as fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), acts as a mechanism to control both the repression and subcellular localization of translation. Dysregulated assembly of RNA granules has been implicated in multiple neurological disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Thus, it is crucial to understand the cellular pathways impinging upon granule assembly or disassembly. The goal of this review is to summarize recent advances in our understanding of the role of the RBP, FMRP, in translational repression underlying RNA granule dynamics, mRNA transport and localized. We summarize the known mechanisms of translational regulation by FMRP, the role of FMRP in RNA transport granules, fragile X granules and stress granules. Focusing on the emerging link between FMRP and stress granules, we propose a model for how hyperassembly and hypoassembly of RNA granules may contribute to neurological diseases.     

Y-box Binding Protein 1: Providing a New Angle on Translational Regulation

Current models of translational regulation are mostly focused on how translational factors engage a messenger mRNA to the ribosome to initiate translation. Since the majority of mRNAs in eukaryotes are translated in a cap-dependent manner, the mRNA 5’ cap-binding protein eIF4E was characterized as a key player responsible for the recruitment of mRNAs to the initiation complex. The availability of eIF4E is believed to be especially critical for translational activation of mRNAs with extensive secondary structures in their 5’UTRs, many of which code for labile regulatory proteins essential for cell growth or viability. Surprisingly, little attention is paid to the other side of translational control, e.g., to define mechanisms responsible for translational silencing and storage of the above messages. In this review, we discuss the possibility that eIF4E per se may not be sufficient to release mRNAs from translational block. We found that many growth- and stress-related mRNAs are associated with the translational repressor YB-1, which can compete with the eIF4E-driven translation initiation complex for binding to the capped 5’ mRNA terminus. Moreover, the cap-dependent repressor activity of YB-1 appears to be negatively regulated via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser-102 residue of YB-1. Taken together with recent evidence suggesting that translational activation of growth-related messages is a primary cellular response to activation of Ras-Erk and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, our data suggest that differential expression of specific mRNA subsets is regulated by the PI3K-Akt pathway and achieved via coordinated activation of the components of translational machinery and inactivation of general translational repressors such as YB-1.     

Temporal translational regulation of the protamine 1 gene during mouse spermatogenesis

Temporal translational control is an important mechanism of gene regulation during mouse spermatogenesis. Studies of the protamine 1 gene, one member of a class of translationally regulated genes, have shown that it is first transcribed post-meiotically in round spermatids, and that the mRNA is stored in an untranslatable form as an inactive ribonucleoprotein particle for up to 1 week before it is translated. The analysis of the expression of fusions between the protamine gene and reporter genes in transgenic mice has demonstrated that sequences mapping in the 3'-untranslated region of the protamine mRNA are sufficient to confer protamine-like translational regulation on the chimeric mRNAs. It is proposed that sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins interact with the protamine 3'-untranslated region and mediate the temporal translational control. Future progress at elucidating the mechanism of translational regulation will come from the identification of translational control factors and their study in vitro and in vivo.     

General RNA‐binding proteins have a function in poly(A)‐binding protein‐dependent translation

The interaction between the poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP) and eukaryotic translational initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which brings about circularization of the mRNA, stimulates translation. General RNA‐binding proteins affect translation, but their role in mRNA circularization has not been studied before. Here, we demonstrate that the major mRNA ribonucleoprotein YB‐1 has a pivotal function in the regulation of eIF4F activity by PABP. In cell extracts, the addition of YB‐1 exacerbated the inhibition of 80S ribosome initiation complex formation by PABP depletion. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate in which PABP weakly stimulates translation is rendered PABP‐dependent after the addition of YB‐1. In this system, eIF4E binding to the cap structure is inhibited by YB‐1 and stimulated by a nonspecific RNA. Significantly, adding PABP back to the depleted lysate stimulated eIF4E binding to the cap structure more potently if this binding had been downregulated by YB‐1. Conversely, adding nonspecific RNA abrogated PABP stimulation of eIF4E binding. These data strongly suggest that competition between YB‐1 and eIF4G for mRNA binding is required for efficient stimulation of eIF4F activity by PABP.     

Determinants of RNA Binding and Translational Repression by the Bicaudal-C Regulatory Protein

Bicaudal-C (Bic-C) RNA binding proteins function as important translational repressors in multiple biological contexts within metazoans. However, their RNA binding sites are unknown. We recently demonstrated that Bic-C functions in spatially regulated translational repression of the xCR1 mRNA during Xenopus development. This repression contributes to normal development by confining the xCR1 protein, a regulator of key signaling pathways, to specific cells of the embryo. In this report, we combined biochemical approaches with in vivo mRNA reporter assays to define the minimal Bic-C target site within the xCR1 mRNA. This 32-nucleotide Bic-C target site is predicted to fold into a stem-loop secondary structure. Mutational analyses provided evidence that this stem-loop structure is important for Bic-C binding. The Bic-C target site was sufficient for Bic-C mediated repression in vivo. Thus, we describe the first RNA binding site for a Bic-C protein. This identification provides an important step toward understanding the mechanisms by which evolutionarily conserved Bic-C proteins control cellular function in metazoans.