不同干预方式及干预时机对急性非ST 段抬高型心肌梗死伴多支病变的 临床效果研究

目的：评估肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)转归前后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术 (coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)治疗急性非ST 段抬高心肌梗死(non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction,NSTEMI)的 有效性及安全性。方法：入选2008 年1 月1 日至2013 年4 月30 日就诊于我院并接受PCI或CABG治疗的NSTEMI患者329 例,分为cTnI转归前PCI 干预组(A 组)、cTnI转归前CABG 干预组(B 组)、cTnI转归后PCI 干预组(C 组)和cTnI 转归后CABG干 预组(D 组)。计算和比较各组的临床终点事件的发生率,再灌注策略对临床终点事件的优势比(OR)。结果：四组患者的完全血运重 建率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),B、C、D组显著高于A组(P<0.05),而B、C、D组之间比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后24 个 月,再次血运重建率：A 组12.9%和B 组3.4%(OR=3.82,95%CI：1.03～16.60),A组12.9%和C 组5.1%(OR=2.55,95%CI：1.29～ 6.61);MACCE事件发生率：A组14.1%和C 组5.9%(OR=2.38,95%CI：1.15～5.79),以上结果比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论：cTnI转归后行PCI治疗NSTEMI伴多支病变患者较cTnI转归前PCI更有利于减少MACCE事件和再次血运重建的发生, cTnI转归前行CABG 术在降低血运重建发生率方面较优于PCI治疗。     

急性ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者多支病变血运重建治疗策略的临床研究

目的:分析急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(acute ST segmentelevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)伴多支血管病变行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的策略,制定患者血运重建时机及最佳方案。方法:收集2008.10-2012.10期间急性ST段抬高心肌梗死伴多支血管病变行急诊PCI治疗患者资料,其中仅行罪犯血管PCI治疗组162例,多支血管PCI治疗组50例、阶段PCI治疗组112例,分析比较各组间短期(3个月)死亡率和1年、2年、3年死亡率及主要心血管事件(major cardiovascularevents,MACE)发生率。结果:①多支血管PCI组较罪犯血管PCI组有更高的短期死亡率(4.0%vs 2.5%,P0.05),但其降低MACE发生率(12.0%vs 15.4%,P0.05);②阶段PCI组较罪犯血管PCI组有更低的死亡率(短期和1年、2年、3年死亡率均P0.05)及MACE发生率(11.6%vs 15.4%,P0.05);③多支血管PCI组较阶段PCI组有更高的短期死亡率(4.0%vsl.8%,P0.05),长期随访无明显不同(6.0%vs 5.4%,P0.05);MACE的发生率无明显差异(12.0%vs 11.6%,P0.05)。结论:当血流动力学稳定时,合并多支血管病变的急性ST段抬高心肌梗死仅对罪犯血管行PCI,随后行阶段PCI处理非梗死病变血管,这一策略能显著改善患者的临床预后。     

PCI治疗糖尿病患者左主干病变的临床研究

目的：研究经皮冠状动脉介入术（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）治疗合并冠状动脉左主干病变糖尿病患者的临床特 征及预后。方法：回顾性分析首次冠脉造影并提示冠状动脉左主干病变接受PCI治疗患者共2350 人,其中2 型糖尿病患者692 人,非糖尿病患者1658 人。比较两组患者的基本临床特征、冠脉造影及介入特点、随访结果等。结果：基线资料中糖尿病组患者的 高血压比例、高血脂比例、脑血管病比例、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL-C）与血肌酐（creatinine, Crea）值明显高于非糖尿病组,在造影及PCI资料中糖尿病患者左主干体部病变和全程病变明显高于非糖尿病患者,左主干病变 完全血运重建率以及药物洗脱支架（Drug eluting stent,DES）使用率明显低于非糖尿病组。糖尿病组患者主要心血管不良事件 （Major adverse cardiac events,MACE）发生率和全因死亡显著增高（13%vs 10%,P<0.05;7.7%vs 5.5%,P<0.05）。结论：PCI 治疗 合并糖尿病冠状动脉左主干病变患者存在可能的临床不良事件率增加的风险。     

药物洗脱支架治疗急性心肌梗死患者临床随访观察

目的:探讨药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死(AMI)入住我院CCU后行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和有效性.方法:选择2007年1月至2007年12月因急性心肌梗死入住我院CCU的220例急性心肌梗死患者,其中于发病12小时内行急诊手术治疗的患者200例,急诊手术仅处理梗死相关血管的靶病变,均植入药物洗脱支架,评价手术成功率、并发症、随访期间心脏不良事件发生率、再狭窄率等.结果:200例患者急诊手术治疗均获得成功,植入支架数量为1.41±0.711枚,未发生与介入治疗有关的严重并发症,住院期间发生心源性死亡2例,非心源性死亡1例,无院内支架内血栓形成、再次心梗,临床随防7.3±1.9(5-15)个月,136例患者复查了冠状动脉造影,造影随访率72.3%,随访终点内死亡5例(死亡率2.66%),含心源性死亡3例,非心源性死亡2例,其中再发心肌梗死1例,6例患者进行了再次靶血管血运重建(3.19%).结论:药物洗脱支架在急性心肌梗死患者行急诊PCI治疗中安全可行,且院内、术后7个月随访观察显示疗效显著,并明显降低靶血管再狭窄率.     

冠心病三支病变置入Firebird2术后3年的随访研究

目的:通过对冠心病三支病变患者置入Firebird 2支架术后3年的随访,探讨Firebird 2支架的性能。方法:收集2009年1月~2012年12月在解放军总医院住院行冠脉造影确诊为冠心病且首次置入Firebird 2支架患者的临床资料,按术后随访时间不同分为术后3年组(70例)与术后1年组(69例),比较两组的临床资料及术后MACE的结果。结果:术后3年组再发心绞痛的比例显著高于术后1年组(33.8 vs 18.2)%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。而两组间性别、年龄、体重指数、SYNTAX积分、LVEF、优势血管(右)、既往史、诊断、NYHA心功能分级,MACE、再次血运重建、总死亡、非致死性心肌梗死及造影复查比例,支架总数及前降支、回旋支和右冠置入支架数比较均无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:冠心病三支病变置入Firebird 2术后3年主要心血管不良事件的发生情况与术后1年相当,但还需大规模、多中心继续随访研究。     

PCI及CABG治疗严重病变程度冠心病患者的临床效果比较

目的:比较经皮冠状动脉介入术(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting,CABG)治疗术前SYNTAX积分32分的重度病变冠状动脉粥样硬化心脏病(Coronary Heart Disease,CHD)患者的临床效果及安全性。方法:纳入2017年3月6日至2017年5月20日在西京医院心血管内外科成功行CABG且术前SYNTAX积分32分的重度病变CHD患者50名和成功行PCI且术前SYNTAX积分32分的重度病变CHD患者50名,分为PCI组与CABG组。比较两组患者的一般基线资料和院内死亡发生情况,术后一年电话随访患者存活情况、病死原因、再次入院、心绞痛、心肌梗死、脑卒中等发生情况,通过SF-12量表和西雅图量表评估患者的生活质量的改善情况。结果:与CABG组相比,PCI组患者心率更低、住院时间更短、住院花费更少、有PCI史的患者比例更高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后一年,两组患者心功能改善情况和主要不良心脑血管事件(major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events,MACCE)发生率、SF-12量表与西雅图心绞痛量表(Seattle Angina Questionnaire, SAQ)的各个维度评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:PCI与CABG治疗不同病变严重程度的冠心病患者的临床效果及安全性相当。     

PCI围术期消化道出血患者抗血小板治疗调整及近期疗效

目的:探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)围术期发生消化道出血(GIB)患者抗血小板治疗的调整,评价其安全性及近期疗效。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2008年12月PCI围术期发生GIB的40例患者的临床资料,其中急性心肌梗死(AMI)22例(55%),不稳定型心绞痛18例(45%)。PCI围术期发生GIB的患者,除扩容、输血、抑酸、保护胃粘膜等支持疗法外,依据临床情况调整抗血小板药物。观察住院期间及术后3个月后主要不良心脑事件(MACCE:包括心绞痛、非致死性心肌梗死、心性死亡、再次血管重建、支架内血栓形成、缺血性卒中)及消化道再次出血的发生率。结果:40例患者PCI成功39例(病例成功率97.5%),1例慢性完全闭塞(CTO)病变导丝未通过,1例(2.5%)AMI患者PCI术后第5天发生支架内亚急性血栓(SAT)。出院后3月内,2例未完全血运重建的患者有心绞痛发作,无死亡,所有患者均无消化道再次出血,MACCE发生率(7.5%)。结论:PCI围术期发生GIB的患者,依据临床情况调整抗血小板药物,不增加MACCE风险及消化道再次出血发生率。     

血运重建程度与不稳定心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后早期预后的相关性

目的:探讨合并左主干/三支病变的不稳定型心绞痛患者的血运重建程度(revascularization extent,RE)及其早期预后的关系。方法:回顾性分析自2012年1月1日-2012年12月31日期间就诊于解放军总医院心血管内科行经皮冠状动脉介入术(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention,PCI)的不稳定型心绞痛患者201例,按其血运重建程度分为三组:低血运重建程度组(Low RE group,RE≤65%),中等血运重建程度组(Medium RE group,65%RE85%),高血运重建程度组(High RE group,RE≥85%),比较三组患者PCI术后主要不良心脑血管事件(Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events,MACCE)的发生情况。结果:血运重建程度RE是不稳定型心绞痛合并左主干/三支病变患者MACCE及再次血运重建的独立预测因子;随着RE的降低,不稳定型心绞痛合并左主干/三支病变患者MACCE(25.0%、9.1%、6.0%,log-rank p=0.002)及再次血运重建(22.1%、7.6%、4.5%,log-rank p=0.002)的发生率增加,而其死亡率及再梗死率的差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:不稳定型心绞痛合并多支血管病变的患者,可行完全再血管化治疗,以减少术后早期再血管化事件率及MACCE事件发生率。     

ST段抬高性和非ST 段抬高性急性心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉病变特点比较

目的:比较ST段抬高性和非ST段抬高性急性心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉病变特点。方法:选取100例在我院接受24h动态心电图和冠状动脉造影检查的急性心肌梗死患者,根据心电图结果分为观察组和对照组各50例。对照组为ST段抬高性心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,观察组为非ST段抬高性心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者,比较两组患者冠状动脉病变的差异。结果:对照组LAD(左前降支)闭塞血管比例(52.00%)显著高于观察组(18.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组LCX(回旋支)闭塞血管比例(8.00%)显著低于观察组(50.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组RCA(右冠脉主干)闭塞血管比例(40.00%)和观察组(30.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组单支病变比例(46.00%)明显高于观察组(12.00%),对照组三支病变比例(20.00%)明显低于观察组(48.00%)比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组二支及正常血管比例与观察组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组罪犯血管狭窄程度在76%-90%、91%-99%及完全闭塞的比例与观察组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。罪犯血管狭窄程度在50%及50%-75%时,两组差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:1NSTEMI罪犯血管闭塞以LCX多见,STEMI罪犯血管闭塞以LAD多见;2NSTEMI以三支血管病变较多见,STEMI以单支病变较多见。     

PCI术前与术后主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性心肌梗死合并心功能不全患者的疗效比较

目的:比较急性心肌梗死合并心功能不全患者冠状动脉介入(PCI)术前及术后植入主动脉内球囊反搏术(IABP)的效果及其安全性.方法:选择50例2010年1月至2011年6月在南京市第一医院CCU病房应用IABP治疗的急性心肌梗死患者,分为两组,A组为术前组,B组为术后组,各25例,观察并比较两组的即刻病情改善率、住院期间并发症及术后30天心功能、主要心血管事件(MACE)发生率.结果:A组IABP即刻病情改善显著高于B组(36％ vs.12％,P＜0.05).两组住院期间并发症的发生率均无统计学差异(P＞0.05).术后30天,A组LVEF显著低于B组(40.2± 7.7％vs.35.6±5.0％,P＜0.05).MACE事件,A组非致死性心肌梗死、再次PCI/CABG术及死亡发生率低于B组,其中A组死亡率显著低于B组,差异有统计学意义(58％vs.32％,P＜0.05).结论:PCI术前植入IABP对于急性心肌梗死合并心功能不全患者的疗效优于PCI术后植入,且不提高并发症的发生率.     

Coronary Artery Disease with Single Coronary Artery

The authors have reviewed the literature in search of the coexistence of single coronary artery with significant coronary artery disease. Two cases of single right coronary artery are described. In both, the anomalies were unsuspected and diagnosed roentgenographically in life. Both patients had angina pectoris, positive graded-exercise stress tests, and hemodynamically significant obstruction or occlusion to the coronary arteries. In neither case was the stenosis proximal or amenable to bypass surgery.     

Coronary Collateral Circulation in Patients of Coronary Ectasia with Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives

Patients with coronary ectasia (CE) usually have coexisting coronary stenosis resulting in myoischemia. Coronary collateral plays an important role in protecting myocardium from ischemia and reducing cardiovascular events. However, limited studies investigate the role of CE in coronary collaterals development.

Methods

We evaluated 1020 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography and 552 patients with significant coronary artery disease (SCAD), defined as diameter stenosis more than 70%, were finally analyzed. CE is defined as the ectatic diameter 1.5 times larger than adjacent reference segment. Rentrop collateral score was used to classify patients into poor (grades 0 and 1) or good (grades 2 and 3) collateral group.

Results

73 patients (13.2%) had CE lesions which were most located in the right coronary artery (53.4%). Patients with CE had a lower incidence of diabetes (43.8% vs 30.1%, p = 0.03), higher body mass index (25.4±3.5 vs 26.7±4.6, p = 0.027) and poorer coronary collateral (58.2% vs 71.2%, p = 0.040). Patients with poor collateral (n = 331) had a higher incidence of CE (15.7% vs 9.5%, p = 0.040) and fewer diseased vessels numbers (1.96±0.84 vs 2.48±0.69, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed diabetes (odd ratio (OR) 0.630, p = 0.026), CE (OR = 0.544, p = 0.048), and number of diseased vessels (OR = 2.488, p<0.001) were significant predictors of coronary collaterals development.

Conclusion

The presence of CE was associated with poorer coronary collateral development in patients with SCAD.     

冠心病相关循环miRNA

冠心病诊断中最主要的挑战就是从常规的血液样本中鉴定出可靠的临床生物标志物.循环miRNA是一种可以稳定存在于体液中的小分子RNA,具有较高的组织、疾病特异性及敏感性,具有作为新的冠心病非侵入性生物标志物的潜力.通过综述血液样本（全血、血浆、血清、外周血单核细胞（PBMC）、内皮祖细胞（EPC）及血小板）中冠心病相关循环miRNA,及探讨循环miRNA研究中存在的一些问题,为未来筛选出真正具有临床应用价值的循环miRNA生物标志物奠定基础.     

Correlation of Chronic Renal Dysfunction and Albuminuria with Severity of Coronary Artery Lesions in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

This study was conducted to investigate the possible correlation of chronic renal dysfunction and albuminuria with the severity of coronary artery lesions in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Two-hundred and ninety-nine patients who had undergone coronary angiography for suspected CAD were stratified into three groups according to the glomerular filtration rate (GFR): group I included 144 patients with normal renal function GFR >90 ml/(min × 1.73 m²), group II included 97 patients with mild renal impairment GFR 60–89 ml/(min × 1.73 m²), and group III included 58 patients with moderate renal impairment GFR <60 ml/(min × 1.73 m²). Patients were then stratified into two groups according to the albuminuria level (0; minimal, 1+, 2+, 3+): the albuminuria negative group (negative = 0) included 171 patients and the albuminuria positive group (positive = minimal, 1+, 2+, 3+) included 128 patients. Clinical features and coronary lesion characteristics were compared among these groups. Patients with more severe renal dysfunction and positive albuminuria had a higher incidence of CAD (66.7 vs. 70.1 vs. 72.4 %, p = 0.025 and 64.2 vs. 75.0 %, p = 0.032), more multi-vessel disease (31.2 vs. 41.2 vs. 53.4 %, p = 0.004 and 33.3 vs. 46.1 %, p = 0.015), more left anterior descending branch lesions (50.7 vs. 56.7 vs. 60.3 %, p = 0.012 and 49.1 vs. 61.7 %, p = 0.009), and a higher Gensini score (42.3 ± 14.7 vs. 46.1 ± 19.9 vs. 52.8 ± 21.2, p = 0.026 and 44.0 ± 16.0 vs. 50.5 ± 20.2, p = 0.017). In conclusion, chronic renal dysfunction and albuminuria may be important factors determining the occurrence and the severity of CAD. Albuminuria was an especially significant indicator at the early stage of renal dysfunction.     

Renal Artery Stenosis Predicts Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Hypertension

In hypertensive patients with indication of renal arteriography to investigate renal artery stenosis (RAS) there are no recommendations regarding when to investigate coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, the predictors of CAD in patients with RAS are not clear. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and the determinants of CAD in hypertensive patients referred to renal angiography. Eighty-two consecutive patients with high clinical risk suggesting the presence of RAS systematically underwent renal angiography and coronary angiography during the same procedure. Significant arterial stenosis was defined by an obstruction≥70% to both renal and coronary territories. Significant CAD was present in 32/82 (39%) and significant RAS in 32/82 (39%) patients. Both CAD and RAS were present in 25.6% from the 82 patients. Patients with severe CAD were older (63±12 vs. 56±13 years; p = 0.03) and had more angina (41 vs. 16%; p = 0.013) compared to patients without severe CAD. Significant RAS was associated with an increased frequency of severe CAD compared to patients without significant RAS (66% vs. 22%, respectively; p<0.001). Myocardial scintigraphy showed ischemia in 21.8% of the patients with CAD. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that RAS≥70% was independently associated with CAD≥70% (OR: 11.48; 95% CI 3.2–40.2; p<0.001), even in patients without angina (OR: 13.48; 95%CI 2.6–12.1; p<0.001). Even considering a small number of patients with significant RAS, we conclude that in hypertensive patients referred to renal angiography, RAS≥70% may be a strong predictor of severe CAD, independently of angina, and dual investigation should be considered.