两种入路髓内钉内固定在胫骨干骨折患者中的应用效果

为了探讨胫骨干骨折患者采用髌上入路、髌下入路髓内钉内固定治疗的效果差异,本研究选取既往手术治疗的126例胫骨干骨折患者进行回顾性分析,收集时间2014年1月至2016年9月,根据手术入路分为髌上入路组60例(髌上入路髓内钉内固定治疗)、髌下入路组66例(髌下入路髓内钉内固定治疗),对比两组患者的手术情况、术后膝关节的恢复差异。研究结果表明,髌上入路组和髌下入路组的手术时间、术中出血量、X线照射次数和骨折平均愈合时间,差异均无统计学意义(p0.05);髌上入路组X线照射次数显著低于髌下入路组,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05);术后3个月,髌上入路组HSS评分高于髌下入路组,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05);术后6个月,髌上入路组和髌下入路组患者的HSS评分差异无统计学意义(p0.05);髌上入路组患者的手术并发症率6.67%显著低于髌下入路组患者的18.18%,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05);髌上入路组患者的手术并发症率6.67%显著低于髌下入路组患者的18.18%,差异具有统计学意义(p0.05)。本研究结论初步表明,胫骨干骨折患者采用髌上入路髓内钉内固定治疗有利于减少X线照射次数、降低手术并发症,术后膝关节功能恢复更快。     

个性化后侧入路治疗胫骨平台后髁冠状面骨折

目的:探讨个性化后侧入路治疗单纯性胫骨平台后髁冠状面骨折手术方法。方法:12例单纯性胫骨平台后髁冠状面骨折的患者,采用后内侧或后外侧以及后内后外联合入路切开复位内固定治疗。结果:12例均获随访,随访时间8-24个月,平均13个月。患者膝关节功能评定按Hohl评分标准:优10例,良2例。复查X线片:骨折复位良好,关节面未见明显塌陷。结论:个性化后侧入路治疗单纯性胫骨平台后髁骨折冠状面可直视下暴露胫骨平台后髁,提供了更广阔的操作空间,有利于骨折的解剖复位内固定。     

带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折的疗效观察

目的观察带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折的疗效。方法对128例胫骨干骨折病人采用带锁髓内钉内固定治疗。结果128例经随访3～20个月。骨折全部达骨性愈合。肢体功能恢复达优109例（85．15％）．良13例（10．15％）。中6例（4．70％）。结论带锁髓内钉是治疗胫骨于骨折的一种较好的内固定方法．     

胫骨平台后侧骨折的手术治疗

目的：探讨对于胫骨平台后侧骨折患者的手术治疗方法及治疗效果。方法：选取本院2010年4月至2012年1月间采用手术治疗的胫骨平台后侧骨折患者23例设为治疗组,本组所有患者均采用后外侧入路的内固定手术治疗方法。另选取同期采用保守治疗的胫骨平台后侧骨折患者20例设为对照组。两组患者治疗后均获得12个月以上的随访。针对两组患者治疗后骨愈合时间、膝关节功能评分以及治疗总有效率等情况进行回顾性对比分析。结果：所有两组患者经治疗后,治疗组患者骨愈合时间明显低于对照组（P〈0．05）,其结果具有统计学意义。且经随访后,治疗组患者膝关节功能评分显著高于对照组（P〈0．05）。而两组患者经综合评价其治疗总有效率对比差异也具有显著性（P〈0．05）,且结果具有统计学意义。结论：对于胫骨平台后侧骨折患者采用后外侧入路的内固定手术治疗拥有显著的临床疗效。此术式具有对骨折部位起到很好的显露及复位稳定等优点,且在治疗效果及患者膝关节功能恢复情况等方面明显优于其它治疗方式。故此方法安全、有效,不失为治疗胫骨平台后侧骨折的首选治疗方法。     

胫骨平台后侧骨折的手术治疗

目的:探讨对于胫骨平台后侧骨折患者的手术治疗方法及治疗效果。方法:选取本院2010年4月至2012年1月间采用手术治疗的胫骨平台后侧骨折患者23例设为治疗组,本组所有患者均采用后外侧入路的内固定手术治疗方法。另选取同期采用保守治疗的胫骨平台后侧骨折患者20例设为对照组。两组患者治疗后均获得12个月以上的随访。针对两组患者治疗后骨愈合时间、膝关节功能评分以及治疗总有效率等情况进行回顾性对比分析。结果:所有两组患者经治疗后,治疗组患者骨愈合时间明显低于对照组(P0.05),其结果具有统计学意义。且经随访后,治疗组患者膝关节功能评分显著高于对照组(P0.05)。而两组患者经综合评价其治疗总有效率对比差异也具有显著性(P0.05),且结果具有统计学意义。结论:对于胫骨平台后侧骨折患者采用后外侧入路的内固定手术治疗拥有显著的临床疗效。此术式具有对骨折部位起到很好的显露及复位稳定等优点,且在治疗效果及患者膝关节功能恢复情况等方面明显优于其它治疗方式。故此方法安全、有效,不失为治疗胫骨平台后侧骨折的首选治疗方法。     

颧骨复合体骨折手术治疗的临床研究

目的：观察和对比头皮冠状切口及小切口联合入路在各种颧骨复合体骨折治疗中的效果。方法：分析2002年～2005年于我院口腔颌面外科救治的62例颧骨复合体骨折病人手术入路及临床效果。结果：根据不同类型的骨折,选择不同术式和切口,术中患者使用微型钛板行坚固内固定,术后均达到面形及功能的恢复。结论：对于大部分颧骨复合体骨折可以采用小切口的单独或联合入路进行治疗,对于颧骨体颧弓粉碎性骨折及陈旧性骨折应采用头皮冠状切口加必要的辅助切口。     

口腔内入路行髁突高位骨折复位固定的临床效果

目的：探讨采用口腔内入路手术复位固定方法治疗下颌骨髁突颈骨折患者的临床效果。方法：将我院收治的20例下颌骨髁突颈骨折患者均使用口腔内入路手术复位固定方法治疗,将患者的骨折片与升支后缘骨块进行手术复位固定,并于原手术切口行回植,重建患者的下颌关节。结果：治疗后咬合关系异常者1例,开口范围限制者0例,关节疼痛者1例,均少于治疗前均为20例;治疗后关节间隙缩小者1例,髁突骨折块形状异常者1例,均少于治疗前均为20例。治疗后髁突稳定者19例,多于治疗前的1例。结论：髁突骨折治疗手术各有优缺点,采用口腔内入路手术复位固定方法治疗髁突高位骨折患者,虽然手术操作难度大,但能较好地克服了术后患者外部皮肤瘢痕明显的问题,有利于保护患者面部神经,提高患者治疗质量水平,值得临床上推广与进一步研究。     

带锁髓内钉治疗四肢长管状骨骨折

一般无锁髓内钉固定,容易发生旋转移位和侧向移位,尤其对螺旋型、粉碎型等骨折难以维持复位,不能形成可靠的固定,而带锁髓内钉则大大增强了对轴向、旋转移位的固定能力.目前,带锁髓内钉已广泛的用于股骨、胫骨、肱骨等四肢长管状骨骨折的治疗.我院自2000年3月起,应用国产的带锁髓内钉治疗四肢骨折80例,取得了满意的临床效果.     

不同入路手术对骨盆髋臼骨折患者骨折复位质量、髋关节功能及炎症因子的影响

目的:探讨不同入路手术对骨盆髋臼骨折患者骨折复位质量、髋关节功能及炎症因子的影响。方法:回顾性分析2016年7月～2018年12月期间我院收治的91例骨盆髋臼骨折患者的临床资料,根据入路方式的不同将其分为A组(n=44,髂腹股沟入路)和B组(n=47,改良Stoppa入路),比较两组患者复位质量、围术期指标、髋关节功能及炎症因子水平,记录两组患者随访期间并发症发生情况。结果:B组术中出血量少于A组,手术切口长度短于A组(P0.05);两组手术显露时间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。B组的骨折复位优良率为85.11%(40/47),高于A组的65.91%(29/44)(P0.05)。与术前相比,两组患者出院时、术后6个月的改良Postel评分成逐渐升高趋势(P0.05);两组患者术前、出院时、术后6个月的改良Postel评分组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者术后7 d血清白介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)水平均高于术前,但B组低于A组(P0.05)。B组随访期间并发症发生率低于A组(P0.05)。结论:改良Stoppa入路手术与髂腹股沟入路手术均可改善骨盆髋臼骨折患者髋关节功能,但经改良Stoppa入路手术者骨折复位质量更佳,创伤更小,炎症反应更轻,同时还可减少并发症发生率。     

改良髌骨下极切除术治疗髌骨下极骨折

髌骨下极骨折在髌骨骨折中占有一定的比例,这类骨折因骨折片细小,采用骨折内固定的方法比较困难。这种情况下,髌骨下极切除术是一种比较常用的术式。作者对髌骨下极切除术进行改良,用于治疗髌骨下极骨折,取得较好的疗效。 1 资料与方法 1.1 临床资料 1998年1月至2000年6月收治的髌骨下极骨折,骨折线未达到髌骨关节面水平的病人12例,其中男性8例,女性4例,平均45.0岁(19～79岁),施行改良髌骨下极切除术。     

弹性髓内钉和钢板固定对儿童股骨干中段骨折的疗效比较

目的:观察并比较弹性髓内钉(ESIN)与钢板固定(PF)治疗儿童股骨干中段骨折的临床疗效。方法:选择2013年2月至2016年12月我院收治的股骨干中段骨折患儿90例,依据治疗方法不同分为ESIN组和PF组。ESIN组(n=45)采用弹性髓内钉固定,PF组(n=45)采用钢板固定,比较两组患者手术时间、手术切口、术中失血量、术后切口引流量等手术指标,随访评估患者住院时间、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间;按Flynn评定标准比较两组患者的最终治疗结果。结果:两组患者术中失血量、术后引流量比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),ESIN组患者手术切口显著小于PF组(P0.05),手术时间、透视时间、完全负重时间均显著短于PF组(P0.05),临床疗效明显优于PF组(P0.05)。结论:与钢板固定比较,弹性髓内钉在手术时间、透视时间显著短于钢板固定,临床疗效明显优于钢板固定,可作为儿童股骨干骨折内固定的首选材料。     

Improve the Efficiency of Surgery for Femoral Shaft Fractures with A Novel Instrument: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo improve the efficacy of closed reduction and wire guiding during intramedullary nail internal fixation in femoral shaft fractures.MethodsA novel instrument was designed and manufactured. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled from February 2011 to December 2013. The instrument designed was used during the operation in the experimental group, but not in the control group.ResultsAll patients exhibited fracture union, excluding 1 patient in the experimental group and 2 in the control group who had non-union; all of whom achieved fracture union with reoperation. There were no statistically significant differences in operative blood loss or duration of hospital stay between the groups (P > 0.05). The operative time, frequency of wire drilling, and number of open reduction cases, were significantly smaller in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionFemoral shaft fractures are difficult to reduce using general methods; the novel instrument showed high clinical value and proved effective and safe in assisting with closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation for femoral shaft fractures.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR ChiCTR-ICR-15007335     

FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES—A Study of Closed Reduction and Open Treatment

A comparative study was made of 58 cases of closed femoral shaft fractures treated by skeletal traction, and 24 cases of closed femoral shaft fractures treated by open reduction with internal fixation.Although complications occurred in some cases, intramedullary nailing appeared to be the most satisfactory method, resulting in primary union, in decreased time of recumbency and time in hospital, in earlier ambulation and in less residual disability.Success of intramedullary nailing depends largely upon adequate training or experience of the surgeon in the technical operative aspects of the procedure and in postoperative management.Placing supplemental autogenous iliac bone chips at the fracture site in closed femoral fractures in which intramedullary nailing is performed appears to enhance callus formation and bony consolidation.Skeletal traction should be utilized on all patients whose general physical condition does not permit operative intervention.     

弹性髓内钉与接骨板内固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的临床疗效对比研究

摘要 目的：对比弹性髓内钉与接骨板内固定治疗儿童股骨干骨折的临床疗效。方法：本研究为回顾性研究,选取我院于2018年3月~2019年8月期间收治的儿童股骨干骨折患者98例,根据固定方式的不同将患儿分为A组（n=50,接骨板内固定治疗）和B组（n=48,弹性髓内钉治疗）,观察两组优良率、术前/术后相关指标及并发症发生情况。结果：B组的优良率高于A组（P<0.05）。B组手术时间、切口长度短于A组,术中出血量少于A组（P<0.05）。B组骨折愈合时间、住院时间、手术至内固定拆除时间、取出内固定手术时间短于A组（P<0.05）。两组患儿并发症发生率对比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：相对于接骨板内固定治疗,弹性髓内钉治疗儿童股骨干骨折,疗效更好,可有效改善术中、术后指标,且不增加并发症的发生率。     

Mechanical boundary conditions of fracture healing: borderline indications in the treatment of unreamed tibial nailing

Unreamed nailing favors biology at the expense of the achievable mechanical stability. It is therefore of interest to define the limits of the clinical indications for this method. The extended usage of unreamed tibial nailing resulted in reports of an increased rate of complications, especially for the distal portion of the tibia. The goals of this work were to gain a thorough understanding of the load-sharing mechanism between unreamed nail and bone in a fractured tibia, to identify the mechanical reasons for the unfavorable clinical results, and to identify borderline indications due to biomechanical factors. In a three-dimensional finite element model of a human tibia, horizontal defects were stabilized by means of unreamed nailing for five different fracture locations, including proximal and distal borderline indications for this treatment method. The loading of the bone, the loading of the implant and the inter-fragmentary strains were computed. The findings of this study show that with all muscle and joint contact forces included, nailing leads to considerable unloading of the interlocked bone segments. Unreamed nailing of the distal defect results in an extremely low axial and high shear strain between the fragments. The results suggest that mechanical conditions are advantageous to unreamed nailing of proximal and mid-diaphyseal defects. Apart from biological reasons, clinical problems reported for distal fractures may be due to the less favorable mechanical conditions in unreamed nailing. From a biomechanical perspective, the treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by means of unreamed nailing without additional fragment contact or without stabilizing the fibula should be carefully reconsidered.     

顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉及锁定加压钢板内固定治疗股骨远端骨折的对比研究

摘要目的：探讨顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉及锁定加压钢板内固定3种方法治疗股骨远端骨折患者的疗效。方法：对2011年1月至2012年12月间我院收治的101例股骨远端骨折进行临床随机分组手术,分别在手术中使用顺行髓内钉、逆行髓内钉以及锁定加压钢板内固定。对三组患者手术时间、术中出血量以及切口长度等一般情况进行比较分析,同时采用Harris评分系统对三组患者术后恢复情况进行分析比较。结果：经过手术治疗后,逆行髓内钉组Harris评分显著高于其他两组（P〈0．05）。另外,逆行髓内钉组手术过程短、出血量少、手术切口小,上述指标与其他两组比较均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论：股骨远端骨折行逆行髓内钉治疗的疗效优于顺行髓内钉以及锁定加压钢板内固定,具有手术时间短、术中出血少、切口小等优点,能够有效提高术后膝关节功能的恢复,值得临床推广使用。     

半伸直位髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定治疗胫骨下1/3螺旋形骨折合并后踝骨折的疗效研究

摘要 目的：探讨半伸直位髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定治疗胫骨下1/3螺旋形骨折合并后踝骨折的疗效。方法：回顾性分析2016年10月至2020年6月期间中国人民解放军陆军第七十三集团军医院收治的60例胫骨下1/3螺旋形骨折合并后踝骨折患者的临床资料,男47例,女13例,年龄18～71岁,平均（53.15±4.06）岁,致伤原因：车祸伤27例,摔伤21例,运动伤12例。根据髓内钉置钉方式不同将其分为两组,半伸直组采用半伸直位髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定（30例）,标准组采用标准髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定（30例）,所有患者术后随访1年。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、踝关节功能、膝关节功能、疼痛程度、并发症的差异。结果：半伸直组手术时间短于标准组（P<0.05）,两组术中出血量、骨折愈合时间比较无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。两组术后美国足踝外科协会（AOFAS）评分、Karlsson踝关节功能（KAFS）评分、美国纽约特种外科医院(HSS)评分均呈增高趋势（P<0.05）,视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分均呈降低趋势（P<0.05）,半伸直组术后12周、术后1年VAS评分均低于标准组（P＜0.05）,HSS评分高于标准组（P＜0.05）。两组并发症发生率比较无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。结论：采用半伸直位髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定治疗胫骨下1/3螺旋形骨折合并后踝骨折患者,与标准髓内钉联合空心螺钉固定比较,安全性和促进踝关节恢复的效果相当,且手术用时更短,患者术后疼痛更轻,膝关节功能改善更明显,在治疗中更具优势。     

Biomechanical assessment and clinical analysis of different intramedullary nailing systems for oblique fractures

The aim of this study is to evaluate the fracture union or non-union for a specific patient that presented oblique fractures in tibia and fibula, using a mechanistic-based bone healing model. Normally, this kind of fractures can be treated through an intramedullary nail using two possible configurations that depends on the mechanical stabilisation: static and dynamic. Both cases are simulated under different fracture geometries in order to understand the effect of the mechanical stabilisation on the fracture healing outcome. The results of both simulations are in good agreement with previous clinical experience. From the results, it is demonstrated that the dynamization of the fracture improves healing in comparison with a static or rigid fixation of the fracture. This work shows the versatility and potential of a mechanistic-based bone healing model to predict the final outcome (union, non-union, delayed union) of realistic 3D fractures where even more than one bone is involved.     

近端膨胀髓内钉与抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效分析

目的:探究近端膨胀髓内钉与近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效及躁动发生率比较。方法:病例来源为2012年5月至2013年10月收入我院的老年股骨转子间骨折患者60例,采用随机数字表随机分为两组,膨胀钉组30例,采用近端膨胀髓内钉的手术方法,PFNA组30例,采用近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉的手术方法。手术结束后,对两组患者进行X射线片、手术时间及出血量、髋关节功能的比较,同时对比躁动发生率。结果:X线检查结果显示两组患者经手术后骨折处均复位良好,无并发症及内固定物的脱落及松动,两组比较无显著差异(P0.05);与PFNA组相比,膨胀组患者的手术时间及出血量明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者术后3个月、6个月的Harris评分显示,与PFNA组相比,膨胀钉组的优良率明显升高,髋关节优于PFNA组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);膨胀钉组患者躁动率为10.00%低于PFNA组患者躁动率为33.33%,具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:可膨胀髓内钉具有手术时间较短、出血量少,更利于骨折的愈合,且躁动发生率较低,对股骨转子间骨折的疗效优于较近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉,对临床有指导意义,值得临床推广。     

Intramedullary Nail versus Dynamic Compression Plate Fixation in Treating Humeral Shaft Fractures: Grading the Evidence through a Meta-Analysis

There is a debate regarding the choice of operative intervention in humeral shaft fractures that require surgical intervention. The choices for operative interventions include intramedullary nailing (IMN) and dynamic compression plate (DCP). This meta-analysis was performed to compare fracture union, functional outcomes, and complication rates in patients treated with IMN or DCP for humeral shaft fractures and to develop GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation)-based recommendations for using the procedures to treat humeral shaft fractures. A systematic search of all the studies published through December 2012 was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Sciencedirect, OVID and Cochrane Central databases. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared IMN with DCP in treating adult patients with humeral shaft fractures and provided data regarding the safety and clinical effects were identified. The demographic characteristics, adverse events and clinical outcomes were manually extracted from all of the selected studies. Ten studies that included a total of 448 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of a meta-analysis indicated that both IMN and DCP can achieve similar fracture union with a similar incidence of radial nerve injury and infection. IMN was associated with an increased risk of shoulder impingement, more restriction of shoulder movement, an increased risk of intraoperative fracture comminution, a higher incidence of implant failure, and an increased risk of re-operation. The overall GRADE system evidence quality was very low, which reduces our confidence in the recommendations of this system. DCP may be superior to IMN in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Because of the low quality evidence currently available, high-quality RCTs are required.