阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑联合克拉霉素治疗Hp 相关消化性溃疡的疗效

目的：探讨阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑联合克拉霉素治疗Hp相关性消化性溃疡的疗效及对患者生活质量的影响,为临床治疗提供 依据。方法：选择2013 年4 月-2015 年4 月本院收治的Hp 相关消化性溃疡患者120 例,根据治疗方法不同将患者分为研究组和 对照组,每组各60 例。研究组采用阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑及克拉霉素联合治疗,对照组采用奥美拉唑单药治疗。观察并比较两组患 者的临床疗效、SDS 评分及SAS 评分。结果：研究组总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;研究组SDS、SAS 评 分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：采用阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑和克拉霉素联合治疗Hp 相关消化性溃疡具有较好的 临床疗效,能够显著改善患者的临床症状,提高生活质量,值得推广应用。     

雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡100例临床疗效治疗

目的:观察雷贝拉唑联用克拉霉素、阿莫西林胶囊治疗良性溃疡疗效.方法:100例良性溃疡病人随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林治疗,对照组采用照组用奥美拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林三联疗法,4周后复查胃镜、检测Hp并复查血、尿常规及肝肾功能.结果:治疗组有效率为94％,对照组有效率为80％,两者有显著性差异(P＜0.05);治疗组Hp转阴率为88％,显著高于对照组的转阴率72％(P＜0.05).结论:雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗胃溃疡疗效高,无明显毒副作用,值得临床推广应用.     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的：观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法：60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组（30例）和治疗组（30例）,其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑＋瑞巴派特＋阿莫西林＋克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果：①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低（P〈0.01）,且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率（43.33%）和总有效率（80.00%）,两组间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率（P〈0.01或0.05）。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性（P〈0.05）。结论：四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

埃索美拉唑对糜烂性胃溃疡患者血清ERK1/2及EGFR水平的影响

目的:探讨埃索美拉唑对糜烂性胃溃疡患者血清ERK1/2及EGFR水平的影响及临床疗效。方法:收集我院糜烂性胃溃疡患者106例,随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组予以奥美拉唑治疗,实验组予以埃索美拉唑治疗。检测并比较两组患者治疗前后血清ERK1/2及EGFR水平变化,观察患者溃疡面积、愈合情况以及临床症状的改善情况等。结果:与治疗前比较,治疗后两组患者血清ERK1/2及EGFR水平上升,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,实验组治疗后ERK1/2及EGFR水平较高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗后两组患者溃疡面积均减小,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,实验组治疗后溃疡愈合情况更显著,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前比较,治疗后两组患者临床症状均获得缓解,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,实验组治疗后症状改善更明显,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:埃索美拉唑可调节糜烂性胃溃疡患者血清ERK1/2及EGFR水平,改善溃疡情况,缓解临床症状,提高临床疗效,值得临床推广应用。     

益胃胶囊四联疗法对幽门螺旋杆菌致消化性溃疡的临床效果

目的:探讨益胃胶囊联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌相关性消化性溃疡的临床疗效。方法:治疗组给予兰索拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素+益胃胶囊治疗,对照组给予兰索拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素治疗,对比分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗组HP清除率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:益胃胶囊联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌相关性消化性溃疡的临床疗效优于常规西医三联疗法治疗幽门螺旋杆菌相关性消化性溃疡。     

四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的:观察埃索美拉唑联合瑞巴派特、阿莫西林、克拉霉素治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡临床疗效。方法:60例确诊的Hp阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为对照组(30例)和治疗组(30例),其中对照组患者给予奥美拉唑+阿莫西林+克拉霉素三联法治疗,实验组给予埃索美拉唑+瑞巴派特+阿莫西林+克拉霉素四联法治疗。观察比较两组患者临床症状缓解情况,溃疡愈合率、Hp根除率及溃疡复发率。结果:①经过治疗,所有患者腹痛、腹胀、反酸、暧气等临床症状积分均显著降低(P<0.01),且治疗组下降程度大于对照组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②治疗组患者痊愈率为60.00%、总有效率为93.33%,明显高于对照组痊愈率(43.33%)和总有效率(80.00%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③治疗组S2期获得率、溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率分别为93.33%、96.67%和93.33%,显著高于对照组60.00%的S2期获得率、70.00%的愈合率和83.33%的根除率(P<0.01或0.05)。④随访1年后,治疗组患者溃疡复发率为11.54%,与对照组32.00%的复发率比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性胃溃疡可有效缓解患者临床症状,提高溃疡愈合质量,根除Hp感染,减少复发,效果优于三联疗法。     

艾司美拉唑治疗胃溃疡患者成本效果的影响因素分析

目的:分析艾司美拉唑治疗胃溃疡患者成本效果的影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2014年9月-2018年1月我院诊治的胃溃疡患者220例的临床病例资料,根据治疗药物的不同分为观察组120例与对照组100例,对照组给予奥美拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林治疗,观察组给予艾司美拉唑+克拉霉素+阿莫西林,两组均持续治疗观察2周,对比两组治疗成本、治疗效果、不良反应的发生情况和成本效果,以及影响艾司美拉唑治疗胃溃疡患者成本效果的因素。结果:观察组与对照组患者完成治疗周期的成本费用分别为567.14±48.23元、551.49±45.61元,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组与对照组的治疗总有效率分别为95.83%(115/120)和82.00%(82/100),观察组显著高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组与对照组治疗期间的腹胀、便秘、恶心、口腔异味等不良反应发生率为8.33%(10/120)和11.00%(11/100),对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组C/E与ΔC/E值均显著低于对照组(P0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示病程、溃疡直径、不良反应为影响艾司美拉唑治疗胃溃疡成本效果的主要因素(P0.05)。结论:艾司美拉唑治疗胃溃疡患者成本效果好,且不会增加不良反应的发生,病程、溃疡直径、不良反应为影响成本效果的主要因素。     

标准四联法对幽门螺旋杆菌相关性消化道溃疡的临床研究

目的观察标准四联对幽门螺旋杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)相关性消化道溃疡的临床效果和安全性。方法选取我院2013年5月至2014年6月收治的H.pylori相关性消化道溃疡患者160例,按照随机数字法随机分为观察组和对照组,每组80例。观察组采用兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素联合胶体果胶铋的标准四联法治疗;对照组采用兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素标准三联法治疗,对比分析两组临床症状缓解率、溃疡愈合率、H.pylori根除率及不良反应情况。结果两组治疗1周的临床症状缓解率相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.064,P0.05);治疗4周后观察组的临床症状缓解率为96.25%,显著性高于对照组的81.25%(χ2=9.014,P0.05)。观察组溃疡愈合率为88.75%,显著性高于对照组的77.5%(χ2=4.449,P0.05);观察组H.pylori根除率为91.25%,显著性高于对照组的76.25%(χ2=6.613,P0.05)。两组治疗期间均未发现肝肾功能异常及其他严重不良反应;两组不良反应发生率相比差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.278,P0.05)。结论标准四联对H.pylori相关性消化道溃疡的临床症状缓解率高、H.pylori根除率高、溃疡愈合率高,安全性高,值得临床推广。     

美沙拉嗪对溃疡性结肠炎患者血清CRP,IL-10及TNF-α水平的影响

目的:探讨美沙拉嗪对溃疡性结肠炎患者血清CRP,IL-10及TNF-α水平的影响。方法:收集我院就诊的120例溃疡性结肠炎患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组60例。两组给予柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片治疗,实验组患者给予美沙拉嗪肠溶片治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清C-反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)及白介素-10(IL-10)水平、临床疗效及安全性。结果:与治疗前相比,治疗后两组患者血清CRP及TNF-α水平均下降,而IL-10水平均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者血清CRP及TNF-α水平较低,而IL-10水平较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者临床治疗有效率较高,不良反应发生率较低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:美沙拉嗪能够抑制溃疡性结肠炎患者的炎症反应水平,降低CRP、TNF-α水平,升高IL-10水平,临床疗效较好,且用药安全。     

阿奇霉素联合辛伐他汀对慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺动脉高压患者肺功能的影响

目的:探讨阿奇霉素联合辛伐他汀治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺动脉高压的临床疗效及对患者肺功能的影响。方法:选取2013年6月-2016年3月我院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺动脉高压患者107例,根据治疗方法不同分为对照组(49例)与实验组(58例)。对照组患者采用阿奇霉素治疗,实验组患者在对照组基础上给予辛伐他汀治疗。观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效、不良反应以及肺功能指标的变化情况。结果:实验组患者治疗有效率(87.93%)高于对照组(73.47%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后1 s用力呼吸容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)及FEV1/FVC水平均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,实验组患者治疗后1 s用力呼吸容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)及FEV1/FVC水平较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清总胆固醇(TC)及三酰甘油(TG)水平均降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组比较,实验组患者治疗后血清总胆固醇(TC)及三酰甘油(TG)水平较低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:阿奇霉素联合辛伐他汀治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺动脉高压的临床效果显著,不仅能够改善患者肺功能,降低血脂相关指标水平,并且安全性较高,值得临床推广应用。     

Comparative Treatment of Helicobacter pylori–Positive Duodenal Ulcer Using Pantoprazole at Low and High Doses Versus Omeprazole in Triple Therapy

Background. Helicobacter pylori eradication has become the standard treatment for peptic ulcer disease. H. pylori –eradicating triple therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics has been used until recently; however, the efficacy of pantoprazole and antibiotics for H. pylori eradication has not been researched thoroughly until now. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to verify the efficacy of triple oral therapy comparing the effects of pantoprazole using two different doses versus omeprazole twice daily in H. pylori eradication, in ulcer healing and relapses, and in gastritis improvement.
Materials and Methods. We enrolled 243 patients with H. pylori– positive duodenal ulcer and randomized them into three treatment groups: 84 patients (group Ome40) were assigned to receive omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm twice daily, and clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily for 10 days; 79 patients (group Pan40) were treated with pantoprazole, 40 mg daily, plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin at the same doses as those of group Ome40; and 80 patients (group Pan80) were treated with pantoprazole, 40 mg twice daily, plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin at the same doses as those of group Ome40.
Results. Ulcer healing was observed in 81 of 84 patients (96.4%) in group Ome40; in 66 of 79 patients (83.5%) in group Pan40; and in 77 of 80 patients (96.2%) in group Pan80. H. pylori was eradicated in 79 of 84 patients (94%) in group Ome40; in 63 of 79 patients (79.7%) in group Pan40; and in 75 of 80 patients (93.7%) in group Pan80.
Conclusions. We found that 10-day triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and either pantoprazole, 80 mg daily, or omeprazole, 40 mg daily, is highly effective in ulcer healing and is very well tolerated, achieving the 90% cure recommended for an ideal first-line anti– H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer treatment regimen.     

帕罗西汀对慢性萎缩性胃炎患者血清胃泌素和胃动素水平的影响

目的:探讨帕罗西汀对慢性萎缩性胃炎患者血清胃泌素和胃动素水平的影响及临床意义。方法:选取我院收治的80例慢性萎缩性胃炎患者,根据治疗方案不同分为常规组及试验组。常规组采用奥美拉唑治疗,试验组采用帕罗西汀治疗,观察并比较两组患者治疗前后血清胃酸度、总酸排出量、复发率、胃动素及胃泌素水平的变化情况。结果:与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后胃酸及总酸排出量均升高,胃动素及胃泌素水平均降低,且试验组患者胃酸及总酸排出量明显高于常规组,胃动素及胃泌素水平明显低于常规组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,试验组复发率为7.5%(3/40),常规组复发率为30.0%(12/40),试验组复发率明显低于常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:帕罗西汀可促进慢性萎缩性胃炎患者血清胃泌素及胃动素水平的改善,可作为临床治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎的有效方案。     

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Regimens Containing Clarithromycin, Metronidazole, and Amoxicillin Among Histologic Subgroups for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in a Developing Country

Background: Most treatments deemed effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in developed countries are less effective in developing countries. Regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin seem efficacious despite antibiotic resistance, and may be a viable option in developing countries. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of a 14‐day regimen with 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 500 mg metronidazole t.i.d., and 500 mg amoxicillin t.i.d. (with and without a proton pump inhibitor), and a 10‐day regimen containing 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 1 g amoxicillin b.i.d., and 20 mg omeprazole b.i.d. in Pasto, Colombia, using a randomized, single‐blind design stratified by presence of atrophic gastritis. Results: H. pylori was eradicated in 86.8% and 85.3% of the participants randomized to a clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin and clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimens, respectively (p = .79). Per‐protocol analyses indicated greater efficacy for the clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin regimen (97%) versus the clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimen (86%) (p = .04), particularly for participants with atrophic gastritis (clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin = 100%, clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole = 81%; p = .02). Adverse events were mild, but adverse event‐related non‐compliance was reported more often for regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an eradication rate of > 85% can be achieved with 14‐day clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin and 10‐day clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimens in Pasto, Colombia. The regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin appear to be superior to the clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimen for compliant participants and those with atrophic gastritis. Our findings provide treatment options for a population in a developing country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infections and antibiotic resistance.     

Six regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in duodenal ulcer patients: three consecutive trials (1995-1999).

AIM: to present our experience in eradicating Hp in three consecutive trials performed between 1995 and 1999. METHODS: 320 duodenal ulcer outpatients have been enrolled in three open, prospective controlled trials. Hp infection was confirmed by Giemsa stain and Rut. In Trial I, 52 cases received 20 mg omeprazole + 2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg tinidazole (OCT), 48 patients were given 20 mg omeprazole, 2 x 1000 mg amoxicillin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole (OAM) for 7 days; in Trial II, 48 cases received 40 mg pantoprazole + 2 x 1000 mg amoxicillin + 2 x 500 mg clarithromycin (PAC) for 7 days and 5l cases 2 x 400 mg ranitidin bismuth citrate + 2 x 500 mg clarithromycin for 14 days (RBC-C); in Trial III, 60 cases were treated with 2 x 30 mg lansoprazole + 2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole and 6l patients received 2 x 400 mg ranitidin bismuth citrate+2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole (RBC-CM). The patients were controlled within 4-6 weeks by endoscopy in trials I-II and 13C-urea breath test in trial III. RESULTS: Eradication rates on ITT/PP basis were: OCT: 72.3/80.2% vs OAM 51.2/63.5% (P = 0.02/P = 0.03); PAC: 80.8/88.3% vs RBC-C 80.3/85.4% (P = 0.65/0.67) and LCM 78.3/92.1% vs RBC-CM 78.7/90.5% (P = 0.86/P = 0.93). Side effects occurred in 5.2, 8.6, 9.5, 14.5, 13.5 and 18.3% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Regimens using 2 x l PPI or RBC + 2 antibiotics for l week proved to be the most effective for Hp eradication in duodenal ulcer patients.     

Current Strategies in Ulcer Management with Special Reference to the Use of Antibiotics

Antibiotics, commonly amoxycillin, tetracycline, metronidazole and clarithromycin, are presently used in combination with anti-ulcer agents such as omeprazole, colloidal bismuth subcitrate, and sucralfate to treat Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer, and compelling evidence has accumulated that eradication of the organism prevents duodenal ulcer relapse. The latest combination (MACH I) involved omeprazole, amoxycillin or metronidazole, and clarithromycin and claimed 90-96 percent success in H. pylori eradication. While the eradication rates of the bacteria are usually between 60-80 percent, the healing rates of duodenal ulcer using these regimens have been remarkably high, often over 90 percent, even with regimens that do not contain proton-pump inhibitors. Antibiotics alone, such as furazolidone and metronidazole, have been reported to heal peptic ulcer with various successes. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled study, we showed that antibiotics alone, in the form of metronidazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin, effectively healed 92.5 percent of patients with duodenal ulcer, and that the healing was largely accountable by clearance of H. pylori. Thus, the present day evidence indicates that both healing and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcer can be achieved by treatment of H. pylori. Metronidazole resistance is emerging rapidly, especially in Asia, and is likely to affect eradication success. At this point in time, the best regimen for peptic ulcer associated with H. pylori includes the use of a proton-pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics for one to two weeks.     

埃索美拉唑治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性十二指肠球部溃疡疗效观察

目的：比较埃索关拉唑与兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Hp）阳性十二指肠球部渍疡疗效观察。方法：将84例Hp阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡随机分为三组。埃索美拉唑组（28例）：埃索美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用埃索美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天;兰索拉唑组（28例）：兰索拉唑15mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用兰索拉唑15mg,每日一次,共21天;奥美拉唑组（28例）：奥美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋呋喃唑酮100mg,每日2次,共7日,后服用奥美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共21天。疗效结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp,观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率,Hp根治率及药物不良反应。结果：埃索美拉唑组、兰索拉唑组和奥关拉唑组溃疡愈合率分别为100％,85．7％,82．1％,HP根治率为85．7％,60．7％,64.3％,埃索美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率高于兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。兰索拉唑组及奥美拉唑组溃疡愈合率及Hp根除率无明显差异（P〉0．05）。三组用药后不良反应少,具较好的安全性。结论：埃索关拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的消化性溃疡疗效优于兰索拉唑及奥美拉唑三联疗法,值得临床广泛应用。     

胃康胶囊联合兰索拉唑肠溶胶囊对胃溃疡患者胃肠激素、炎症反应和T淋巴细胞亚群的影响

摘要 目的：观察胃康胶囊联合兰索拉唑肠溶胶囊治疗胃溃疡的疗效及对胃肠激素、炎症反应和T淋巴细胞亚群的影响。方法：选择2018年9月~2021年5月在中国人民解放军31694部队医院消化内科接受治疗的80例胃溃疡患者作为观察对象,根据信封抽签法分为对照组和观察组,各为40例。对照组患者接受兰索拉唑肠溶胶囊治疗,观察组患者接受胃康胶囊联合兰索拉唑肠溶胶囊治疗,连续治疗6周。对比两组临床疗效、幽门螺杆菌（Hp）根除率和溃疡愈合率,观察治疗期间不良反应发生情况,对比两组治疗前、治疗6周后的胃肠激素、血清炎症因子和T淋巴细胞亚群指标水平的变化。结果：观察组的临床总有效率较对照组高（P<0.05）。观察组的Hp根除率和溃疡愈合率均高于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗6周后,两组CD3⁺、CD4⁺、CD4⁺/CD8⁺较治疗前升高,CD8⁺ 较治疗前下降,且观察组的改善效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗6周后,两组胃动素（MTL）水平较治疗前升高,胃泌素（GAS）水平较治疗前下降,且观察组的改善效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗6周后,两组高迁移率族蛋白B1（HMGB1）、白介素-6（IL-6）、C反应蛋白（CRP）水平较治疗前下降,且观察组的改善效果优于对照组（P<0.05）。两组不良反应发生率对比无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论：兰索拉唑肠溶胶囊联合胃康胶囊可提高胃溃疡患者的溃疡愈合率和Hp根除率,其作用机制可能与调节胃肠激素、炎症反应和T淋巴细胞亚群指标水平有关。     

幽门螺杆菌根除治疗对消化性溃疡患者血清胃泌素水平的影响

目的 观察幽门螺杆菌(H．pylori)根除治疗对消化性溃疡患者血清胃泌素水平的影响,为该病治疗提供参考.方法 选择我院2017年8月至2019年8月收治的120例H.pylori感染的消化性溃疡患者作为观察组,根据H.pylori分型结果进一步分为HPⅠ型组和HPⅡ型组,观察组患者接受根除幽门螺杆菌治疗.选择同期入院...     

小儿消化性疾病的胃电图变化及与临床特点和胃镜特征的关联性

目的:分析小儿消化性疾病的胃电图变化及与临床病理特征和胃镜特征的关联性。方法:选取2018年1月至2019年5月我院儿科收治的经胃镜和病理学两种方式诊断为消化性疾病的患儿54例为观察组,另选取无胃肠道疾病的健康儿童40例为对照组。比较两组胃电图参数(频率均值和波幅均值),54例胃电图诊断后纤维胃镜检查结果,分析消化性疾病患儿HP感染与临床病理特征、溃疡面积的关系。结果:各组胃病患者胃电慢波频率均值各不相同(P0.05),三组患者胃电慢波波幅均值相比差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);且浅表性胃炎组、胆汁反流性胃炎组患者胃电慢波频率均值、胃电慢波波幅均显著低于胃溃疡组(P0.05);浅表性胃炎组患者胃电慢波频率均值显著低于胆汁反流性胃炎组(P0.05)。胆汁反流性胃炎组患者胃电慢波波幅显著低于浅表性胃炎组(P0.05)。胃镜检查结果显示,其中浅表性胃炎的诊断符合率较高,达90.00%,胃溃疡符合率为60.71%,胆汁反流性胃炎符合率为83.33%。HP检测结果显示,HP阳性患儿占总例数的77.78%(42/54),HP阴性患儿占总例数的22.22%(12/54);HP阳性组患儿淋巴滤泡形成、胃黏膜萎缩、胃黏膜炎性活动的发生率明显高于HP阴性组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01);HP阳性组溃疡范围2 cm的患儿比例明显高于HP阴性患儿,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:小儿消化性疾病胃电图存在餐后NSWP的下降及节律过缓的上升,胃电图检查和胃镜检查在诊断上有较高的符合率,HP感染科引起胃黏膜组织学改变,可作为小儿消化性疾病的靶向治疗。