Molecular dynamics simulation of biased agonists at the dopamine D2 receptor suggests the mechanism of receptor functional selectivity

The dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) is the primary target for antipsychotic drugs. Besides schizophrenia, this receptor is linked to dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and depression. Recent studies have shown that β-arrestin biased agonists at this receptor treat schizophrenia with less side effects. Although the high resolution structure of this receptor exists, the mechanism of biased agonism at the receptor is unknown. In this study, dopamine, the endogenous unbiased G-protein agonist, MLS1547, a G-protein biased agonist, and UNC9975, a G-protein antagonist and a β-arrestin biased agonist, were docked to a homology model of the whole D2R including all flexible loops, and molecular dynamics simulations were conducted to study the potential mechanisms of biased agonism. Our thorough analysis on the protein–ligand interaction, secondary structure, tertiary structure, structure dynamics, and molecular switches of all three systems indicates that ligand binding to transmembrane 3 might be essential for G-protein recruitment, while ligand binding to transmembrane 6 might be essential for β-arrestin recruitment. Our analysis also suggests changes in both the secondary and the tertiary structures of TM5 and TM7, molecular switches and ICL3 flexibility are important in biased signaling.

Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma     

Mechanisms of ligand binding and efficacy at the human D2(short) dopamine receptor

Mechanisms of ligand binding and receptor activation for the human D2(short) dopamine receptor have been probed using two homologous series of monohydroxylated and dihydroxylated agonists (phenylethylamines and 2-dipropylaminotetralins). In ligand binding studies, the majority of compounds exhibited competition curves versus [3H]spiperone that were best fitted using a two site binding model. The compounds had different abilities (potencies and maximal effects) to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding and to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. From the data it can be concluded that: (i) the ability of an agonist to stabilize receptor/G protein coupling can be used to predict agonist efficacy for some groups of compounds (2-dipropylaminotetralins) but not for others (phenylethylamines); (ii) the receptor may be activated by unhydroxylated compounds; (iii) single hydroxyl groups or pairs of hydroxyl groups on the agonist may contribute to binding affinity, potency and efficacy; and (iv) for the 2-dipropylaminotetralin series two modes of agonist/receptor interaction have been identified associated with different relative efficacy.     

A 5-HT4 receptor transmembrane network implicated in the activity of inverse agonists but not agonists

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors is thought to involve disruption of intramolecular interactions that stabilize their inactive conformation. Such disruptions are induced by agonists or by constitutively active mutations. In the present study, novel potent inverse agonists are described to inhibit the constitutive activity of 5-HT(4) receptors. Using these compounds and specific receptor mutations, we investigated the mechanisms by which inverse agonists may reverse the disruption of intramolecular interactions that causes constitutive activation. Two mutations (D100(3.32)A in transmembrane domain (TMD)-III and F275(6.51)A in TMD-VI) were found to completely block inverse agonist effects without impairing their binding properties nor the molecular activation switches induced by agonists. Based on the rhodopsin model, we propose that these mutated receptors are in equilibrium between two states R and R* but are unable to reach a third "silent" state stabilized by inverse agonists. We also found another mutation in TMD-VI (W272(6.48)A) that stabilized this silent state. This mutant remained fully activated by agonists. Molecular modeling indicated that Asp-100, Phe-275, and Trp-272 might constitute a network required for stabilization of the silent state by the described inverse agonists. However, this network is not necessary for agonist activity.     

Role of the extracellular amino terminus and first membrane-spanning helix of dopamine D1 and D5 receptors in shaping ligand selectivity and efficacy

Transmembrane (TM) helices of human D1-like dopaminergic receptors (hD1R and hD5R) harbor the same residues implicated in ligand binding and activation of catecholamine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Yet, hD1R and hD5R naturally display the distinct functional properties shared by wild type and constitutively active mutant GPCRs, respectively. Interestingly, we show in the present study that a class of synthetic phenylbenzazepine agonists containing a methyl on the azepine ring exhibited lower affinity for the more constitutively activated hD5R. These results cannot be explained by the “allosteric ternary complex model” postulating a higher agonist affinity for constitutively active GPCRs. We have also explored the functional role of distinct extracellular amino terminus (NT) and TM1 regions of hD1R and hD5R using a chimerical approach. Of these two regions, our studies suggest that TM1 predominantly shapes D1-like ligand affinity and selectivity. Additionally, NT and TM1 of hD1R and hD5R play no role in receptor constitutive activity but differentially modulate dopamine-mediated responsiveness. The TM1 exchange mediated drastic changes in intrinsic efficacy and activity of phenylbenzazepine drugs displaying partial agonism at hD1R and hD5R. Phenylbenzazepines were converted into strong partial agonists or full agonists in cells expressing hD1R-TM1^D5 chimera while being switched from full agonists to partial agonists and partial agonists to antagonists in cells harboring hD5R-TM1^D1 chimera. TM1 exchange had no effect on antipsychotic-mediated inverse agonism. In summary, our study shows that NT and TM1 of D1-like receptors control ligand binding and agonist-induced activation, poising these regions as important structural determinants for catecholamine GPCR function.     

Generation of an agonistic binding site for blockers of the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) exist in a spontaneous equilibrium between active and inactive conformations that are stabilized by agonists and inverse agonists respectively. Because ligand binding of agonists and inverse agonists often occurs in a competitive manner, one can assume an overlap between both binding sites. Only a few studies report mutations in GPCRs that convert receptor blockers into agonists by unknown mechanisms. Taking advantage of a genetically modified yeast strain, we screened libraries of mutant M(3)Rs {M(3) mAChRs [muscarinic ACh (acetylcholine) receptors)]} and identified 13 mutants which could be activated by atropine (EC50 0.3-10 microM), an inverse agonist on wild-type M(3)R. Many of the mutations sensitizing M(3)R to atropine activation were located at the junction of intracellular loop 3 and helix 6, a region known to be involved in G-protein coupling. In addition to atropine, the pharmacological switch was found for other M(3)R blockers such as scopolamine, pirenzepine and oxybutynine. However, atropine functions as an agonist on the mutant M(3)R only when expressed in yeast, but not in mammalian COS-7 cells, although high-affinity ligand binding was comparable in both expression systems. Interestingly, we found that atropine still blocks carbachol-induced activation of the M(3)R mutants in the yeast expression system by binding at the high-affinity-binding site (Ki approximately 10 nM). Our results indicate that blocker-to-agonist converting mutations enable atropine to function as both agonist and antagonist by interaction with two functionally distinct binding sites.     

Mechanisms of agonism and inverse agonism at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors

Mechanisms of agonist and inverse agonist action at the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor have been studied using the modulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in membranes of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the receptor (CHO-5-HTA1A cells). A range of agonists increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding with different potencies and to different maximal extents, whereas two compounds, methiothepin and spiperone, inhibited both agonist-stimulated and basal [5S]GTPgammaS binding, thus exhibiting inverse agonism. Potencies of agonists to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes from CHO-5-HT1A cells were reduced by adding increasing concentrations of GDP to assays, whereas changes in sodium ion concentration did not affect agonist potency. The maximal effect of the agonists was increased by increasing sodium ion concentrations. The affinities of agonists in ligand binding assays were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. Increasing GDP in the assays of the inverse agonists increased potency for spiperone to inhibit [35S]GTPgammaS binding and had no effect for methiothepin, in agreement with the sensitivity of these compounds to guanine nucleotides in ligand binding assays. Potencies for these inverse agonists were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. These data were simulated using the extended ternary complex model. These simulations showed that the data obtained with agonists were consistent with these compounds achieving agonism by stabilising the ternary complex. For inverse agonists, the simulations showed that the mechanism for spiperone may be to stabilise forms of the receptor uncoupled from G proteins. Methiothepin, however, probably does not alter the equilibrium distribution of different receptor species; rather, this inverse agonist may stabilise an inactive form of the receptor that can still couple to G protein.     

Differential bonding interactions of inverse agonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in stabilizing the inactive state

Although the sartan family of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs), which includes valsartan, olmesartan, and losartan, have a common pharmacophore structure, their effectiveness in therapy differs. Although their efficacy may be related to their binding strength, this notion has changed with a better understanding of the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that each ARB differs with regard to its molecular interactions with AT(1) receptor in inducing inverse agonism. Interactions between valsartan and residues Ser(105), Ser(109), and Lys(199) were important for binding. Valsartan is a strong inverse agonist of constitutive inositol phosphate production by the wild-type and N111G mutant receptors. Substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies indicated that valsartan, but not losartan, which has only weak inverse agonism, may stabilize the N111G receptor in an inactive state upon binding. In addition, the inverse agonism by valsatan was mostly abolished with S105A/S109A/K199Q substitutions in the N111G background. Molecular modeling suggested that Ser(109) and Lys(199) bind to phenyl and tetrazole groups of valsartan, respectively. Ser(105) is a candidate for binding to the carboxyl group of valsartan. Thus, the most critical interaction for inducing inverse agonism involves transmembrane (TM) V (Lys(199)) of AT(1) receptor although its inverse agonist potency is comparable to olmesartan, which bonds with TM III (Tyr(113)) and TM VI (His(256)). These results provide new insights into improving ARBs and development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists.     

Serine mutations in transmembrane V of the dopamine D1 receptor affect ligand interactions and receptor activation.

Several serines present in transmembrane domain V are conserved among members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family that bind catecholamines. Two of these serines that are present in the beta-adrenergic receptor were previously shown by site-directed mutagenesis to affect agonist binding and receptor activation (Strader, C. D., Candelore, M. R., Hill, W. S., Sigal, I. S., and Dixon, R. A. F. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13572-13578). We investigated the role of the serines present in transmembrane V of another catecholamine receptor, the dopamine D1 receptor, by site-directed mutagenesis, and the results show that mutations at serines 198, 199, and 202 affect dopamine binding. The substitution of serine 198 or serine 199 by an alanine also affects the binding of several other agonist and antagonist dopaminergic compounds while an alanine substitution at serine 202 has no effect on the binding of these compounds. Moreover, each single serine mutation decreased the maximal cAMP accumulation elicited by a dopamine D1 partial agonist. These results suggest that serines present in transmembrane V of the D1 receptor affect ligand interactions and receptor signal transduction, but not entirely in the manner that would be predicted from the model proposed for the beta-adrenergic receptor.     

Effect of multiple serine/alanine mutations in the transmembrane spanning region V of the D2 dopamine receptor on ligand binding

Three conserved serine residues (Ser193, Ser194, and Ser197) in transmembrane spanning region (TM) V of the D2 dopamine receptor have been mutated to alanine, individually and in combination, to explore their role in ligand binding and G protein coupling. The multiple Ser -->Ala mutations had no effect on the binding of most antagonists tested, including [3H]spiperone, suggesting that the multiple mutations did not affect the overall conformation of the receptor protein. Double or triple mutants containing an Ala197 mutation showed a decrease in affinity for domperidone, whereas Ala193 mutants showed an increased affinity for a substituted benzamide, remoxipride. However, dopamine showed large decreases in affinity (>20-fold) for each multiple mutant receptor containing the Ser193Ala mutation, and the high-affinity (coupled) state of the receptor (in the absence of GTP) could not be detected for any of the multiple mutants. A series of monohydroxylated phenylethylamines and aminotetralins was tested for their binding to the native and multiple mutant D2 dopamine receptors. The results obtained suggest that Ser193 interacts with the hydroxyl of S-5-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin (OH-DPAT) and Ser197 with the hydroxyl of R-5-OH-DPAT. We predict that Ser193 interacts with the hydroxyl of R-7-OH-DPAT and the 3-hydroxyl (m-hydroxyl) of dopamine. Therefore, the conserved serine residues in TMV of the D2 dopamine receptor are involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with selected antagonists and most agonists tested and also enable agonists to stabilise receptor-G protein coupling.     

Linking non-peptide ligand binding mode to activity at the human cholecystokinin-2 receptor

Given the importance of G-protein-coupled receptors as pharmacological targets in medicine, efforts directed at the understanding the molecular mechanism by which pharmacological compounds regulate their activity is of paramount importance. Here, we investigated at an atomic level the mechanism of inverse agonism and partial agonism of two high affinity, high selectivity very similar non-peptide ligands of the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R) which differ by the absence or presence of a methyl group on their indole moiety. Using in silico, site-directed mutagenesis and pharmacological experiments, we demonstrated that these functionally different activities are due to differing anchoring modes of the two compounds to a residue of helix II (Thr-2.61) in the inactive state of the CCK2R. The binding mode of the inverse agonist allows the ligand to interact through its phenyl moiety with a key amino acid for CCK2R activation (Trp-6.48), preventing rotation of helix VI and, thus, CCK2R activation, whereas the partial agonist binds deeper into the binding pocket and closer to helix V, so that CCK2R activation is favored. This study on the molecular mechanism of ligand action opens the possibility of target-based optimization of G protein-coupled receptor non-peptide ligands.     

Agonist regulation of D(2) dopamine receptor/G protein interaction. Evidence for agonist selection of G protein subtype

The D(2) dopamine receptor has been expressed in Sf21 insect cells together with the G proteins G(o) and G(i2), using the baculovirus system. Expression levels of receptor and G protein (alpha, beta, and gamma subunits) in the two preparations were similar as shown by binding of [(3)H]spiperone and quantitative Western blot, respectively. For several agonists, binding data were fitted best by a two-binding site model in either preparation, showing interaction of expressed receptor and G protein. For some agonists, binding to the higher affinity site was of higher affinity in D(2)/G(o) than in the D(2)/G(i2) preparation. Some agonists exhibited binding data that were best fitted by a two-binding site model in D(2)/G(o) and a one-binding site model in D(2)/G(i2). Therefore, receptor/G protein interaction seemed to be stronger in the D(2)/G(o) preparation. Agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S (guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate) binding in the two preparations also gave evidence for higher affinity D(2)/G(o) interaction. In the D(2)/G(o) preparation, agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding occurred at higher potency for several agonists, and a higher stimulation (relative to dopamine) was achieved in D(2)/G(o) compared with D(2)/G(i2). Some agonists were able to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the D(2)/G(o) preparation but not in D(2)/G(i2). The extent of D(2) receptor selectivity for G(o) over G(i2) is therefore dependent on the agonist used, and thus agonists may stabilize different conformations of the receptor with different abilities to couple to and activate G proteins.     

Constitutive precoupling to G(i) and increased agonist potency in the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor

The human alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2B)-AR) was mutated by substituting the D(3.49) aspartate in position 109 with an alanine (alpha(2B)-D109A) in the conserved DRY sequence at the cytoplasmic face of TM3. We studied the effects of the mutation on agonist binding and on receptor activation in CHO cells, including possible inverse agonism monitored by measuring intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)). The mutated receptor had increased binding affinity for agonists, especially dexmedetomidine (3.8-fold). The increased affinity was abolished by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. The mutation produced constitutive receptor activity evidenced as increased basal [Ca(2+)](i) and increased potency and efficacy of agonists to elicit Ca(2+) responses. The imidazoline derivative RX821002 functioned as an inverse agonist only through the alpha(2B)-D109A, reducing [Ca(2+)](i). The results thus indicate that this mutation causes constitutive receptor-G(i)-protein precoupling, and that the D(3.49) aspartate residue of the DRY motif is involved in controlling coupled and uncoupled conformations of alpha(2B)-AR.     

Identification of an efficacy switch region in the ghrelin receptor responsible for interchange between agonism and inverse agonism

The carboxyamidated wFwLL peptide was used as a core ligand to probe the structural basis for agonism versus inverse agonism in the constitutively active ghrelin receptor. In the ligand, an efficacy switch could be built at the N terminus, as exemplified by AwFwLL, which functioned as a high potency agonist, whereas KwFwLL was an equally high potency inverse agonist. The wFw-containing peptides, agonists as well as inverse agonists, were affected by receptor mutations covering the whole main ligand-binding pocket with key interaction sites being an aromatic cluster in transmembrane (TM)-VI and -VII and residues on the opposing face of TM-III. Gain-of-function in respect of either increased agonist or inverse agonist potency or swap between high potency versions of these properties was obtained by substitutions at a number of positions covering a broad area of the binding pocket on TM-III, -IV, and -V. However, in particular, space-generating substitutions at position III:04 shifted the efficacy of the ligands from inverse agonism toward agonism, whereas similar substitutions at position III: 08, one helical turn below, shifted the efficacy from agonism toward inverse agonism. It is suggested that the relative position of the ligand in the binding pocket between this "efficacy shift region" on TM-III and the opposing aromatic cluster on TM-VI and TM-VII leads either to agonism, i.e. in a superficial binding mode, or it leads to inverse agonism, i.e. in a more profound binding mode. This relationship between different binding modes and opposite efficacy is in accordance with the Global Toggle Switch model for 7TM receptor activation.     

Allosteric modulator ORG27569 induces CB1 cannabinoid receptor high affinity agonist binding state, receptor internalization, and Gi protein-independent ERK1/2 kinase activation

The cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), a member of the class A G protein-coupled receptor family, is expressed in brain tissue where agonist stimulation primarily activates the pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibitory G protein (G(i)). Ligands such as CP55940 ((1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3- hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol) and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol are orthosteric agonists for the receptor, bind the conventional binding pocket, and trigger G(i)-mediated effects including inhibition of adenylate cyclase. ORG27569 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)ethyl]amide) has been identified as an allosteric modulator that displays positive cooperativity for CP55940 binding to CB1 yet acts as an antagonist of G protein coupling. To examine this apparent conundrum, we used the wild-type CB1 and two mutants, T210A and T210I (D'Antona, A. M., Ahn, K. H., and Kendall, D. A. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 5606-5617), which collectively cover a spectrum of receptor states from inactive to partially active to more fully constitutively active. Using these receptors, we demonstrated that ORG27569 induces a CB1 receptor state that is characterized by enhanced agonist affinity and decreased inverse agonist affinity consistent with an active conformation. Also consistent with this conformation, the impact of ORG27569 binding was most dramatic on the inactive T210A receptor and less pronounced on the already active T210I receptor. Although ORG27569 antagonized CP55940-induced guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding, which is indicative of G protein coupling inhibition in a concentration-dependent manner, the ORG27569-induced conformational change of the CB1 receptor led to cellular internalization and downstream activation of ERK signaling, providing the first case of allosteric ligand-biased signaling via CB1. ORG27569-induced ERK phosphorylation persisted even after pertussis toxin treatment to abrogate G(i) and occurs in HEK293 and neuronal cells.     

Synthesis and functional activity of (2-aryl-1-piperazinyl)-N-(3-methylphenyl)acetamides: selective dopamine D4 receptor agonists

Diaryl piperazine acetamides were identified as potent and selective dopamine D(4) receptor agonists. Our strategy is based on an amide bond reversal of an acid sensitive, dopamine D(4) receptor partial agonist, PD 168077. This reversal provided compounds with excellent potency and improved stability. Systematic evaluation of the substitution on the aryl piperazine portion revealed a significant effect on functional activity. The synthesis and biological activity of these new dopamine D(4) agonists is discussed.     

Plasticity of the ligand binding pocket in the bitter taste receptor T2R7

Bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are a group of 25 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in humans. The cognate agonists and the mechanism of ligand binding to the majority of the T2Rs remain unknown. Here we report the first structure-function analysis of T2R7 and study the ability of this receptor to bind to different agonists by site-directed mutagenesis. Screening of ligands for T2R7 in calcium based assays lead to the identification of novel compounds that activate this receptor. Quinine, diphenidol, dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine showed substantial activation of T2R7. Interestingly, these bitter compounds showed different pharmacological characteristics. To investigate the structural features in T2R7 that might contribute to the observed differences in agonist specificities, molecular model guided ligand docking and site-directed mutagenesis was pursued. Amino acids D65, D86, W89, N167, T169, W170, S181, T255 and E271 in the ligand-binding pocket were replaced and the mutants characterized pharmacologically. Our results suggest D86, S181 and W170 present on the extracellular side of transmembrane 3 (TM3), TM5 and in extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) are essential for agonist binding in T2R7. Mutations of these amino acids lead to loss-of-function. We also identified gain-of-function residues that are agonist specific. These results suggest that agonists bind at an extracellular site rather than deep within the TM core involving residues present in both ECL2 and TM helices in T2R7. Similar to majority of the Class A GPCRs, ECL2 in T2R7 plays a significant role in agonist binding and activation.     

5-HT(2A) and D(2) receptor blockade increases cortical DA release via 5-HT(1A) receptor activation: a possible mechanism of atypical antipsychotic-induced cortical dopamine release

Atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), all of which are relatively more potent as serotonin (5-HT)(2A) than dopamine D(2) antagonists, may improve negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia, in part, via increasing cortical dopamine release. 5-HT(1A) agonism has been also suggested to contribute to the ability to increase cortical dopamine release. The present study tested the hypothesis that clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and perhaps other atypical APDs, increase dopamine release in rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) via 5-HT(1A) receptor activation, as a result of the blockade of 5-HT(2A) and D(2) receptors. M100907 (0.1 mg/kg), a 5-HT(2A) antagonist, significantly increased the ability of both S:(-)-sulpiride (10 mg/kg), a D(2) antagonist devoid of 5-HT(1A) affinity, and R:(+)-8-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg/kg), a 5-HT(1A) agonist, to increase mPFC dopamine release. These effects of M100907 were abolished by WAY100635 (0.05 mg/kg), a 5-HT(1A) antagonist, which by itself has no effect on mPFC dopamine release. WAY100635 (0.2 mg/kg) also reversed the ability of clozapine (20 mg/kg), olanzapine (1 mg/kg), risperidone (1 mg/kg), and the R:(+)-8-OH-DPAT (0.2 mg/kg) to increase mPFC dopamine release. Clozapine is a direct acting 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, whereas olanzapine and risperidone are not. These results suggest that the atypical APDs via 5-HT(2A) and D(2) receptor blockade, regardless of intrinsic 5-HT(1A) affinity, may promote the ability of 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation to increase mPFC DA release, and provide additional evidence that coadministration of 5-HT(2A) antagonists and typical APDs, which are D(2) antagonists, may facilitate 5-HT(1A) agonist activity.     

Evidence that calmodulin binding to the dopamine D2 receptor enhances receptor signaling

The Ca2+ sensor calmodulin (CaM) regulates numerous proteins involved in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. CaM binds directly to some GPCRs, including the dopamine D2 receptor. We confirmed that the third intracellular loop of the D2 receptor is a direct contact point for CaM binding using coimmunoprecipitation and a polyHis pull-down assay, and we determined that the D2-like receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT increased the colocalization of the D2 receptor and endogenous CaM in both 293 cells and in primary neostriatal cultures. The N-terminal three or four residues of D2-IC3 were required for the binding of CaM; mutation of three of these residues in the full-length receptor (I210C/K211C/I212C) decreased the coprecipitation of the D2 receptor and CaM and also significantly decreased D2 receptor signaling, without altering the coupling of the receptor to G proteins. Taken together, these findings suggest that binding of CaM to the dopamine D2 receptor enhances D2 receptor signaling.     

Agonist-specific transactivation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway mediated by the dopamine D2 receptor

Bromocriptine, acting through the dopamine D2 receptor, provides robust protection against apoptosis induced by oxidative stress in PC12-D2R and immortalized nigral dopamine cells. We now report the characterization of the D2 receptor signaling pathways mediating the cytoprotection. Bromocriptine caused protein kinase B (Akt) activation in PC12-D2R cells and the inhibition of either phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), or c-Src eliminated the Akt activation and the cytoprotective effects of bromocriptine against oxidative stress. Co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that the D2 receptor forms a complex with the EGFR and c-Src that was augmented by bromocriptine, suggesting a cross-talk between these proteins in mediating the activation of Akt. EGFR repression by inhibitor or by RNA interference eliminated the activation of Akt by bromocriptine. D2 receptor stimulation by bromocriptine induced c-Src tyrosine 418 phosphorylation and EGFR phosphorylation specifically at tyrosine 845, a known substrate of Src kinase. Furthermore, Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor or dominant negative Src interfered with Akt translocation and phosphorylation. Thus, the predominant signaling cascade mediating cytoprotection by the D2 receptor involves c-Src/EGFR transactivation by D2 receptor, activating PI 3-kinase and Akt. We also found that the agonist pramipexole failed to stimulate activation of Akt in PC12-D2R cells, providing an explanation for our previous observations that, despite efficiently activating G-protein signaling, this agonist had little cytoprotective activity in this experimental system. These results support the hypothesis that specific dopamine agonists stabilize distinct conformations of the D2 receptor that differ in their coupling to G-proteins and to a cytoprotective c-Src/EGFR-mediated PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway.     

Functional role of a conserved motif in TM6 of the rat mu opioid receptor: constitutively active and inactive receptors result from substitutions of Thr6.34(279) with Lys and Asp.

Mutations within the "X1BBX2X3B" motif or its variants in the junction of the third intracellular (i3) loop and the sixth transmembrane domain (TM6) have been shown to lead to constitutive activation of several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this study, T6.34(279) at the X3 locus of the rat mu opioid receptor was mutated to Lys and Asp, and the mutants were examined for binding and signaling properties. The T6.34(279)K mutant was poorly expressed, and pretreatment with naloxone greatly enhanced its expression. This construct exhibited properties identified previously with constitutive activation: (1) compared with the wild type, it produced much higher agonist-independent [35S]GTPgammaS binding, which was abolished by pertussis toxin treatment; (2) it displayed an enhanced affinity for the agonist DAMGO similar to that of the high-affinity state of the wild type, which was not altered by GTPgammaS, while having unchanged affinity for the antagonist diprenorphine. The T6.34(279)K mutant displayed a higher intracellular receptor pool than the wild type. Naloxone inhibited the basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding of the T6.34(279)K mutant, demonstrating inverse agonist activity at this mutant receptor. In contrast, the T6.34(279)D substitution did not increase basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding, greatly reduced agonist-promoted [35S]GTPgammaS binding, and markedly decreased affinity for DAMGO. Thus, the T6.34(279)D mutant adopts conformations corresponding to inactive states of the receptor. The results were interpreted in the structural context of a model for the mu opioid receptor that incorporates the information from the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The interaction of T6.34(279) with R3.50(165) in the mu opioid receptor is considered to stabilize the inactive conformations. The T6.34(279)K substitution would then disrupt this interaction and support agonist-free activation, while T6.34(279)D mutation should strengthen this interaction which keeps the receptor in inactive states. T6.34(279) may, in addition, interact with the neighboring R6.35(280) to help constrain the receptor in inactive states, and T6.34(279)K and T6.34(279)D mutations would affect this interaction by disrupting or strengthening it, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the results presented here represent the first structurally rationalized demonstration that mutations of this locus can lead to dramatically different properties of a GPCR.