Groucho oligomerization is required for repression in vivo

Drosophila Groucho (Gro) is a member of a family of metazoan corepressors with widespread roles in development. Previous studies indicated that a conserved domain in Gro, termed the Q domain, was required for repression in cultured cells and mediated homotetramerization. Evidence presented here suggests that the Q domain contains two coiled-coil motifs required for oligomerization and repression in vivo. Mutagenesis of the putative hydrophobic faces of these motifs, but not of the hydrophilic faces, prevents the formation of both tetramers and higher order oligomers. Mutagenesis of the hydrophobic faces of both coiled-coil motifs in the context of a Gal4-Gro fusion protein prevents repression of a Gal4-responsive reporter in S2 cells, while mutagenesis of a single motif weakens repression. The finding that the repression directed by the single mutants depends on endogenous wild-type Gro further supports the idea that oligomerization plays a role in repression. Overexpression in the fly of forms of Gro able to oligomerize, but not of a form of Gro unable to oligomerize, results in developmental defects and ectopic repression of Gro target genes in the wing disk. Although the function of several corepressors is suspected to involve oligomerization, these studies represent one of the first direct links between corepressor oligomerization and repression in vivo.     

The Arabidopsis FILAMENTOUS FLOWER gene is required for flower formation.

A screen for mutations affecting flower formation was carried out and several filamentous flower (fil) alleles were identified. In fil mutants, floral primordia occasionally give rise to pedicels lacking flowers at their ends. This defect is dramatically enhanced in fil rev double mutants, in which every floral primordium produces a flowerless pedicel. These data suggest that the FIL and REV genes are required for an early step of flower formation, possibly for the establishment of a flower-forming domain within the floral primordium. The FIL gene is also required for establishment of floral meristem identity and for flower development. During flower development, the FIL gene is required for floral organ formation in terms of the correct numbers and positions; correct spatial activity of the AGAMOUS, APETALA3, PISTILLATA and SUPERMAN genes; and floral organ development.     

Anticancer effect of retinoic acid via AP-1 activity repression is mediated by retinoic acid receptor alpha and beta in gastric cancer cells

To uncover the mechanisms relating to the anticancer effect of retinoic acids in gastric cancer cells, the mediation of activator protein-1 (AP-1) activity repression by retinoic acid receptors (RARs) was investigated. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) inhibited AP-1 activity in BGC-823 cells (RARalpha(+), RARbeta(+)), but not in MKN-45 cells (RARalpha(lo), RARbeta(-)). Transient transfection of RARbeta expression vector into MKN-45 cells significantly resulted in direct repression of AP-1 activity in a receptor concentration-dependent manner, and this could be strengthened by ATRA. Stable transfection of RARbeta into MKN-45 cells directly inhibited cell growth and colony formation, and ATRA also enhanced these effects. Transient transfection of RARalpha into MKN-45 cells however, displayed receptor concentration-dependent AP-1 activity inhibition only in the presence of ATRA. Stable transfection of RARalpha into MKN-45 cells resulted in ATRA-dependent inhibition of cell growth and colony formation. For AP-1 binding activity induced by TPA, the repressive effect of ATRA was only observed in BGC-823 and RARalpha and RARbeta stably transfected MKN-45 cells, but not in intact MKN-45 cells. This indicates the necessity for sufficient cellular RARalpha and/or RARbeta in order for AP-1 activity repression to occur. Deletion of DNA binding domain (DBD) of RARbeta, but not ligand binding domain (LBD), eliminated the anti-AP-1 function of RARbeta. It is therefore concluded that both RARalpha and RARbeta are mediators in the anticancer function of ATRA via AP-1 activity inhibition, and that RARbeta, not RARalpha, can inhibit AP-1 activity to a certain extent directly by itself. Thus DBD, not LBD, is critical for anti-AP-1 activity.     

Ectopic hypermethylation of flower-specific genes in Arabidopsis

BACKGROUND: Arabidopsis mutations causing genome-wide hypomethylation are viable but display a number of specific developmental abnormalities, including some that resemble known floral homeotic mutations. We previously showed that one of the developmental abnormalities present in an antisense-METHYLTRANSFERASEI (METI) transgenic line resulted from ectopic hypermethylation of the SUPERMAN gene. RESULTS: Here, we investigate the extent to which hypermethylation of SUPERMAN occurs in several hypomethylation mutants, and describe methylation effects at a second gene, AGAMOUS. SUPERMAN gene hypermethylation occurred at a high frequency in several mutants that cause overall decreases in genomic DNA methylation. The hypermethylation pattern was largely similar in the different mutant backgrounds. Genetic analysis suggests that hypermethylation most likely arose either during meiosis or somatically in small sectors of the plant. A second floral development gene, AGAMOUS, also became hypermethylated and silenced in an Arabidopsis antisense-METI line. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ectopic hypermethylation of specific genes in mutant backgrounds that show overall decreases in methylation may be a widespread phenomenon that could explain many of the developmental defects seen in Arabidopsis methylation mutants. This resembles a phenomenon seen in cancer cells, which can simultaneously show genome-wide hypomethylation and hypermethylation of specific genes. Comparison of the methylated sequences in SUPERMAN and AGAMOUS suggests that hypermethylation could involve DNA secondary structures formed by pyrimidine-rich sequences.     

Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directly associated with hexose phosphorylation by hexokinases PI and PII

Genetic and biochemical analyses showed that hexokinase PII is mainly responsible for glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, indicating a regulatory domain mediating glucose repression. Hexokinase PI/PII hybrids were constructed to identify the supposed regulatory domain and the repression behavior was observed in the respective transformants. The hybrid constructs allowed the identification of a domain (amino acid residues 102-246) associated with the fructose/glucose phosphorylation ratio. This ratio is characteristic of each isoenzyme, therefore this domain probably corresponds to the catalytic domain of hexokinases PI and PII. Glucose repression was associated with the C-terminal part of hexokinase PII, but only these constructs had high catalytic activity whereas opposite constructs were less active. Reduction of hexokinase PII activity by promoter deletion was inversely followed by a decrease in the glucose repression of invertase and maltase. These results did not support the hypothesis that a specific regulatory domain of hexokinase PII exists which is independent of the hexokinase PII catalytic domain. Gene disruptions of hexokinases further decreased repression when hexokinase PI was removed in addition to hexokinase PII. This proved that hexokinase PI also has some function in glucose repression. Stable hexokinase PI overproducers were nearly as effective for glucose repression as hexokinase PII. This showed that hexokinase PI is also capable of mediating glucose repression. All these results demonstrated that catalytically active hexokinases are indispensable for glucose repression. To rule out any further glycolytic reactions necessary for glucose repression, phosphoglucoisomerase activity was gradually reduced. Cells with residual phosphoglucoisomerase activities of less than 10% showed reduced growth on glucose. Even 1% residual activity was sufficient for normal glucose repression, which proved that additional glycolytic reactions are not necessary for glucose repression. To verify the role of hexokinases in glucose repression, the third glucose-phosphorylating enzyme, glucokinase, was stably overexpressed in a hexokinase PI/PII double-null mutant. No strong effect on glucose repression was observed, even in strains with 2.6 U/mg glucose-phosphorylating activity, which is threefold increased compared to wild-type cells. This result indicated that glucose repression is only associated with the activity of hexokinases PI and PII and not with that of glucokinase.     

植物转录抑制子的结构特征及其作用机理

转录因子依转录调控能力可分为激活子和抑制子。植物转录抑制蛋白的分类依据很多,从作用方式上可分为主动抑制子和被动抑制子两大类：根据与DNA结合的方式则可分为锌指类、MYB类、AP2／EREBP类、bHLH类和bZlP类等。植物主动抑制子通过其含有的抑制域对转录直接起抑制作用。抑制域又可分很多类,但多数为含有类似EAR基序的保守性基序,其上具有几个保守性亮氨酸残基。植物转录抑制子主要通过对激活子或基本转录复合物产生作用及改变染色体结构3种方式来抑制目标基因的转录。有关植物转录抑制子的研究虽很欠缺,但以拟南芥SUPERMAN等抑制子的EAR基序为代表的研究表明,抑制域是阐明植物转录抑制子功能和下游基因表达调控机理的核心对象,而融合抑制子沉默技术（CRES-T）也为人为调控基因沉默带来了新的技术手段。     

The unconserved groucho central region is essential for viability and modulates target gene specificity

Groucho (Gro) is a Drosophila corepressor required by numerous DNA-binding repressors, many of which are distributed in gradients and provide positional information during development. Gro contains well-conserved domains at its N- and C-termini, and a poorly conserved central region that includes the GP, CcN, and SP domains. All lethal point mutations in gro map to the conserved regions, leading to speculation that the unconserved central domains are dispensable. However, our sequence analysis suggests that the central domains are disordered leading us to suspect that the lack of lethal mutations in this region reflects a lack of order rather than an absence of essential functions. In support of this conclusion, genomic rescue experiments with Gro deletion variants demonstrate that the GP and CcN domains are required for viability. Misexpression assays using these same deletion variants show that the SP domain prevents unrestrained and promiscuous repression by Gro, while the GP and CcN domains are indispensable for repression. Deletion of the GP domain leads to loss of nuclear import, while deletion of the CcN domain leads to complete loss of repression. Changes in Gro activity levels reset the threshold concentrations at which graded repressors silence target gene expression. We conclude that co-regulators such as Gro are not simply permissive components of the repression machinery, but cooperate with graded DNA-binding factors in setting borders of gene expression. We suspect that disorder in the Gro central domains may provide the flexibility that allows this region to mediate multiple interactions required for repression.