Studies on histone organization in the nucleosome using formaldehyde as a reversible cross-linking agent

A new procedure is described which allows selective reversal of formaldehyde cross-linking in both histone-histone and histone-DNA of nuclei isolated from calf thymus. All ten possible dimers of the four non-H1 histones, H3, H2B, H2A and H4, are observed, the major dimers being H3-H3, H3-H2A, H2B-H2A, H2a-H2A and two separate dimers of H2B-H4. Although oligomers of the non-H1 histones are formed by prolonged treatment with this reagent, 50% of the histones continue to remain resistant to cross-linking with each other. For those histones which cross-linking with each other. For those histones which cross-link, the site of cross-linking within the molecules is located in the "core" (trysin-resistant) regionand therfore indicates proximities for these molecules within the nucleosome. The core region also cross-links to DNA, indicating intimate interactions between this region in all the non-H1 histones with DNA.     

Histone synthesis and deposition in the G1 and S phases of hepatoma tissue culture cells

Hepatoma tissue culture cells were synchronized in G1 and in S phase in order to examine the level of synthesis of different histone types and to determine the rate, timing, and location of their deposition onto DNA. We observe a basal level of synthesis in G1 (5% of that seen in S phase) for H2A.1, H2A.2, H3.2, H2B, and H4. The minor histone variants X and Z are synthesized at 30% of the rate observed in S cells. The rate of synthesis of the ubiquinated histones uH2A.1,2 is not as depressed in G1 cells as seen for H2A.1 and H2A.2. Histones synthesized in G1 are not deposited on the DNA of these cells at equivalent rates. Thus, histones H3.2 and H4 are not deposited significantly until S phase begins, at which time deposition occurs selectively on newly synthesized DNA. The deposition of H2A.1, H2A.2, H2B, X, and Z proceeds in G1; however, it occurs to a 2-4-fold lower extent than seen for the deposition of H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17. The deposition of all histones synthesized in S phase occurs rapidly, but there are variations in the sites of deposition. Thus, newly synthesized H3.1, H3.2, and H4 deposit primarily on newly replicated DNA whereas H2A.1, H2A.2, uH2A.1, 2, and H2B deposit only partially on new DNA (30%) and mostly on old. H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17 are deposited in an apparently fully random manner over the chromatin. To interpret these observations, we propose a model which includes a measure of histone exchange on the chromatin fiber. The model emphasizes the dynamics of histone-histone and histone-DNA interactions in regions of active genes and at replication forks.     

Chromatin replication.

Just as the faithful replication of DNA is an essential process for the cell, chromatin structures of active and inactive genes have to be copied accurately. Under certain circumstances, however, the activity pattern has to be changed in specific ways. Although analysis of specific aspects of these complex processes, by means of model systems, has led to their further elucidation, the mechanisms of chromatin replication in vivo are still controversial and far from being understood completely. Progress has been achieved in understanding: 1. The initiation of chromatin replication, indicating that a nucleosome-free origin is necessary for the initiation of replication; 2. The segregation of the parental nucleosomes, where convincing data support the model of random distribution of the parental nucleosomes to the daughter strands; and 3. The assembly of histones on the newly synthesized strands, where growing evidence is emerging for a two-step mechanism of nucleosome assembly, starting with the deposition of H3/H4 tetramers onto the DNA, followed by H2A/H2B dimers.     

Disruption of the nucleosomes at the replication fork.

The fate of parental nucleosomes during chromatin replication was studied in vitro using in vitro assembled chromatin containing the whole SV40 genome as well as salt-treated and native SV40 minichromosomes. In vitro assembled minichromosomes were able to replicate efficiently in vitro, when the DNA was preincubated with T-antigen, a cytosolic S100 extract and three deoxynucleoside triphosphates prior to chromatin assembly, indicating that the origin has to be free of nucleosomes for replication initiation. The chromatin structure of the newly synthesized daughter strands in replicating molecules was analysed by psoralen cross-linking of the DNA and by micrococcal nuclease digestion. A 5- and 10-fold excess of protein-free competitor DNA present during minichromosome replication traps the segregating histones. In opposition to published data this suggests that the parental histones remain only loosely or not attached to the DNA in the region of the replication fork. Replication in the putative absence of free histones shows that a subnucleosomal particle is randomly assembled on the daughter strands. The data are compatible with the formation of a H3/H4 tetramer complex under these conditions, supporting the notion that under physiological conditions nucleosome core assembly on the newly synthesized daughter strands occurs by the binding of H2A/H2B dimers to a H3/H4 tetramer complex.     

Structural insight into how the human helicase subunit MCM2 may act as a histone chaperone together with ASF1 at the replication fork

MCM2 is a subunit of the replicative helicase machinery shown to interact with histones H3 and H4 during the replication process through its N-terminal domain. During replication, this interaction has been proposed to assist disassembly and assembly of nucleosomes on DNA. However, how this interaction participates in crosstalk with histone chaperones at the replication fork remains to be elucidated. Here, we solved the crystal structure of the ternary complex between the histone-binding domain of Mcm2 and the histones H3-H4 at 2.9 Å resolution. Histones H3 and H4 assemble as a tetramer in the crystal structure, but MCM2 interacts only with a single molecule of H3-H4. The latter interaction exploits binding surfaces that contact either DNA or H2B when H3-H4 dimers are incorporated in the nucleosome core particle. Upon binding of the ternary complex with the histone chaperone ASF1, the histone tetramer dissociates and both MCM2 and ASF1 interact simultaneously with the histones forming a 1:1:1:1 heteromeric complex. Thermodynamic analysis of the quaternary complex together with structural modeling support that ASF1 and MCM2 could form a chaperoning module for histones H3 and H4 protecting them from promiscuous interactions. This suggests an additional function for MCM2 outside its helicase function as a proper histone chaperone connected to the replication pathway.     

The organization of histones and DNA in chromatin: Evidence for an arginine-rich histone kernel

We have examined the role played by various histones in the organization of the DNA of the nucleosome, using staphylococcal nuclease as a probe of DNA conformation. When this enzyme attacks chromatin, a series of fragments evenly spaced at 10 base pair intervals is generated, reflecting the histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome structure. To determine what contribution the various histones make to DNA organization, we have studied the staphylococcal nuclease digestion patterns of complexes of DNA with purified histones.Virtually all possible combinations of homogeneous histones were reconstituted onto DNA. Exhaustive digestion of a complex containing the four histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 yields a DNA fragment pattern very similar to that of whole chromatin. The only other combinations of histones capable of inducing chromatin-like DNA organization are H2A/H2B/H4 and those mixtures containing both H3 and H4. From an examination of the kinetics of digestion of H3/H4 reconstitutes, we conclude that although the other histones have a role in DNA organization within the nucleosome, the arginine-rich histone pair, H3/H4, can organize DNA segments the length of the nucleosome core in the absence of all other histones.     

Role of individual histone tyrosines in the formation of the nucleosome complex.

We have determined the accessibility of histone tyrosine residues to react with p-nitrobenzenesulfonyl fluoride (NBSF) in intact nuclei, salt-dissociated nucleosomes, isolated histone complexes, and individual core histones. Of the 15 core histone tyrosine residues, 13 are inaccessible in native nucleosomes; only Tyr121 near the C-terminus of H2B is fully accessible, and Tyr54 of H3 is partially accessible under near-physiological conditions. When H1 and the basic N-terminal tails of the core histones are dissociated from the DNA by treating nuclei with 0.4 and 0.8 M NaCl, the two tyrosines which are adjacent to the basic regions of H2B and H3 become accessible as well. This indicates that these tyrosine residues may be involved in histone-DNA interactions, either directly or indirectly. When the H2A-H2B dimers are dissociated from the chromatin by raising the NaCl concentration to 1.2 M, three to four tyrosines located in the structured regions of H2B and H4 are exposed, suggesting that these tyrosine residues may be located at the dimer-tetramer interface. Dissociating all the histones from the DNA at an even higher ionic strength as a mixture of dimers, tetramers, and octamers does not change the pattern of Tyr exposure, but reduces the reactivity of the tyrosines at the dimer-tetramer interface as would be expected from the reassociation of H2A-H2B dimers and H3-H4 tetramers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nonrandom assembly of chromatin during hydroxyurea inhibition of DNA synthesis

Incubation of MSB-1 chicken lymphoblastoid cells with hydroxyurea leads to a rapid 25-fold decrease in the incorporation of [3H]thymidine into DNA and a 5-fold decrease [3H]lysine into the nucleosome core histones. I have investigated whether the distortion in the normal proportion of histone-DNA synthesis results in alterations in the nucleosome assembly process and find that neither the stoichiometry of new histone synthesis nor the deposition is appreciably changed during hydroxyurea incubation. Protein cross-linking and micrococcal nuclease digestion show that the histones synthesized during hydroxyurea treatment form octamer structures and are assembled into typical nucleosome particles. Minor nucleosome subpopulations are found which exhibit altered sensitivity to nuclease digestion and which are depleted in new histones H3 and H4. When MSB-1 cells incubated in hydroxyurea are pulsed briefly with density-labeled amino acids and [3H]lysine, the radiolabeled core histone octamers formed are as dense as individual monomer histones. These results suggest that the newly synthesized histone octamers are uniformly dense and do not contain mixtures of new and old histones. Thus, histones synthesized during hydroxyurea incubation are deposited nonrandomly and do not exchange with preexisting histones.     

DNase I site mapping and micrococcal nuclease digestion of pachytene chromatin reveal novel structural features

A comparison of the DNase I digestion products of the 32P-5'-end-labeled pachytene nucleosome core particles (containing histones H2A, TH2A, X2, H2B, TH2B, H3, and H4) and liver nucleosome core particles (containing somatic histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) revealed that the cleavage sites that are 30, 40, and 110 nucleotides away from the 5'-end are significantly more accessible in the pachytene core particles than in the liver core particles. These cleavage sites correspond to the region wherein H2B interacts with the nucleosome core DNA. These results, therefore, suggest that the histone-DNA interaction at these sites in the pachytene core particles is weaker, possibly because of the presence of the histone variant TH2B interacting at similar topological positions in the nucleosome core as that of its somatic counterpart H2B. Such a loosened structure may also be maintained even in the native pachytene chromatin since micrococcal nuclease digestion of pachytene nuclei resulted in a higher ratio of subnucleosomes (SN4 + SN7) to mononucleosomes than that observed in liver chromatin.     

In and out: histone variant exchange in chromatin

Alterations in nucleosome structure affect the accessibility of the DNA and can generate specialized domains of chromatin in the genome. Such changes can be introduced by posttranslational modifications of histones, by chromatin remodeling, or by the incorporation of variants of H2A and H3 into nucleosomes. In contrast to the canonical histones, which are deposited behind the replication fork during S phase, histone variants are incorporated in a process that is independent of DNA replication. Recent studies have shown that distinct multiprotein complexes are responsible for the targeted deposition of histone variants at active genes, centromeres and silent loci. The incorporation of histone variants most probably has epigenetic consequences and contributes to architectural changes in chromosomes.     

The intrinsically disordered distal face of nucleoplasmin recognizes distinct oligomerization states of histones

The role of Nucleoplasmin (NP) as a H2A-H2B histone chaperone has been extensively characterized. To understand its putative interaction with other histone ligands, we have characterized its ability to bind H3-H4 and histone octamers. We find that the chaperone forms distinct complexes with histones, which differ in the number of molecules that build the assembly and in their spatial distribution. When complexed with H3-H4 tetramers or histone octamers, two NP pentamers form an ellipsoidal particle with the histones located at the center of the assembly, in stark contrast with the NP/H2A-H2B complex that contains up to five histone dimers bound to one chaperone pentamer. This particular assembly relies on the ability of H3-H4 to form tetramers either in solution or as part of the octamer, and it is not observed when a variant of H3 (H3C110E), unable to form stable tetramers, is used instead of the wild-type protein. Our data also suggest that the distal face of the chaperone is involved in the interaction with distinct types of histones, as supported by electron microscopy analysis of the different NP/histone complexes. The use of the same structural region to accommodate all type of histones could favor histone exchange and nucleosome dynamics.     

Conservative segregation of tetrameric units of H3 and H4 histones during nucleosome replication

We have specifically investigated the behavior of H3 and H4 histones during the replication cycle of MH-134SC cells. Mononucleosomes obtained from cells density-labeled with IdU or dense amino acids in the presence of appropriate radiolabeled precursors were applied to sucrose gradients containing 0.3 M NaCl and 4 M urea for rate zonal centrifugation. This allowed the resolution of dense and normal subnucleosome particles composed of DNA and two molecules each of H3 and H4 without any measurable interparticle histone exchange. On labeling with dense amino acids and radiolabeled lysine, a distinct peak of radiolabeled dense particles was obtained. In contrast, pre-radiolabeled H3 and H4 remained in the normal subnucleosome peak region even after one generation time of culturing with dense amino acids. These data indicate the formation of (H3-H4)2 tetramers composed entirely of new H3 and H4 molecules as well as the conservation of pre-existing tetramers. Density labeling for 1 h with IdU in the presence of radiolabeled lysine yielded a distinct peak of radiolabeled dense particles, indicating the deposition of new tetramers on newly replicated DNA. Similar rate zonal analysis of subnucleosome particles obtained from cells prelabeled for 1 h with radiolabeled lysine followed by various IdU-labeling schedules in nonisotopic media yielded data suggesting that tetramers once deposited do not move about randomly during the replication cycle. A possible mode of nucleosome replication is discussed in the light of the present data.     

Replication-coupled chromatin assembly of newly synthesized histones: distinct functions for the histone tail domains

The maintenance of the genome during replication requires the assembly of nucleosomes with newly synthesized histones. Achieving the deposition of newly synthesized histones in chromatin implies their transport from the cytoplasm to the nucleus at the replication sites. Several lines of evidence have revealed critical functions of the histone tail domains in these conserved cellular processes. In this review, we discuss the role of the amino termini of the nucleosome building blocks, H2A/H2B and H3/H4, in different model systems. The experimental data showed that H2A/H2B tails and H3/H4 tails display distinct functions in nuclear import and chromatin assembly. Furthermore, we describe recent studies exploiting the unique properties of the slime mold, Physarum polycephalum , that have advanced understanding of the function of the highly conserved replication-dependent diacetylation of H4.