Comparative effects of intraduodenal fat and glucose on the gut-incretin axis in healthy males

BackgroundThe interaction of nutrients with the small intestine stimulates the secretion of numerous enteroendocrine hormones that regulate postprandial metabolism. However, differences in gastrointestinal hormonal responses between the macronutrients are incompletely understood. In the present study, we compared blood glucose and plasma hormone concentrations in response to standardised intraduodenal (ID) fat and glucose infusions in healthy humans.MethodsIn a parallel study design, 16 healthy males who received an intraduodenal fat infusion were compared with 12 healthy males who received intraduodenal glucose, both at a rate of 2 kcal/min over 120 min. Venous blood was sampled at frequent intervals for measurements of blood glucose, and plasma total and active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), insulin and glucagon.ResultsPlasma concentrations of the incretin hormones (both total and active GLP-1 and GIP) and glucagon were higher, and plasma insulin and blood glucose concentrations lower, during intraduodenal fat, when compared with intraduodenal glucose, infusion (treatment by time interaction: P < 0.001 for each).ConclusionsCompared with glucose, intraduodenal fat elicits substantially greater GLP-1, GIP and glucagon secretion, with minimal effects on blood glucose or plasma insulin in healthy humans. These observations are consistent with the concept that fat is a more potent stimulus of the ‘gut-incretin’ axis than carbohydrate.     

Overview of incretin hormones.

Incretins are hormones released by nutrients from the GI tract. They amplify glucose-induced insulin release. By raising circulating incretin levels, oral glucose provokes a higher insulin response than that resulting from intravenous glucose. The two most important incretin hormones are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). In patients with type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is decreased, mainly due to loss of the GIP-regulated second phase of insulin secretion, and because of a decreased secretion of GLP-1. In addition to its insulinotropic effect, GLP-1 inhibits glucagon release, prolongs gastric emptying, and leads to decreases in body-weight, all of which explain the marked antidiabetogenic effect of this incretin hormone.     

The biology of incretin hormones

Gut peptides, exemplified by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are secreted in a nutrient-dependent manner and stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Both GIP and GLP-1 also promote β cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, leading to expansion of β cell mass. GLP-1, but not GIP, controls glycemia via additional actions on glucose sensors, inhibition of gastric emptying, food intake and glucagon secretion. Furthermore, GLP-1, unlike GIP, potently stimulates insulin secretion and reduces blood glucose in human subjects with type 2 diabetes. This article summarizes current concepts of incretin action and highlights the potential therapeutic utility of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

Cellular glucose availability and glucagon-like peptide-1

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) are produced in enteroendocrine L-cells and K-cells, respectively. They are known as incretins because they potentiate postprandial insulin secretion. Although unresponsiveness of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients to GIP has now been reconsidered, GLP-1 mimetics and inhibitors of the GLP-1 degradation enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 have now been launched as drugs against T2D. The major roles of GLP-1 in T2D are reduction of appetite, gastric motility, glucagon secretion, enhancement of insulin secretion and β-cell survival. For insulin secretion and peripheral insulin function, GLP-1 and its mimetics sensitise β-cells to glucose; accelerate blood glucose withdrawal, in-cell glucose utilisation and glycogen synthesis in insulin-sensitive tissues; and assist in the function and survival of neurons mainly using glucose as an energy source. Taken together, GLP-1 acts to potentiate glucose availability of various cells or tissues to assist with their essential functions and/or survival. Herein, we review the signalling pathways and clinical relevance of GLP-1 in enhancing cellular glucose availability. On the basis of our recent research results, we also describe a mechanism that regulates GLP-1 for glucokinase activity. Because diabetic tissues including β-cells resist glucose, GLP-1 may be useful for treating T2D.     

Acute and long-term effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on glucose metabolism in subjects with Type 2 diabetes and normal glucose tolerance

Our aim was to study the potential mechanisms responsible for the improvement in glucose control in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) within days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Thirteen obese subjects with T2D and twelve matched subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were examined during a liquid meal before (Pre), 1 wk, 3 mo, and 1 yr after RYGB. Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent-insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon concentrations were measured. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-GS), and disposition index (D(β-GS): β-GS × 1/HOMA-IR) were calculated. Within the first week after RYGB, fasting glucose [T2D Pre: 8.8 ± 2.3, 1 wk: 7.0 ± 1.2 (P < 0.001)], and insulin concentrations decreased significantly in both groups. At 129 min, glucose concentrations decreased in T2D [Pre: 11.4 ± 3, 1 wk: 8.2 ± 2 (P = 0.003)] but not in NGT. HOMA-IR decreased by 50% in both groups. β-GS increased in T2D [Pre: 1.03 ± 0.49, 1 wk: 1.70 ± 1.2, (P = 0.012)] but did not change in NGT. The increase in DI(β-GS) was 3-fold in T2D and 1.5-fold in NGT. After RYGB, glucagon secretion was increased in response to the meal. GIP secretion was unchanged, while GLP-1 secretion increased more than 10-fold in both groups. The changes induced by RYGB were sustained or further enhanced 3 mo and 1 yr after surgery. Improvement in glycemic control in T2D after RYGB occurs within days after surgery and is associated with increased insulin sensitivity and improved β-cell function, the latter of which may be explained by dramatic increases in GLP-1 secretion.     

Neural regulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in pigs

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 is secreted rapidly from the intestine postprandially. We therefore investigated its possible neural regulation. With the use of isolated perfused porcine ileum, GLP-1 secretion was measured in response to electrical stimulation of the mixed, perivascular nerve supply and infusions of neuroactive agents alone and in combination with different blocking agents. Electrical nerve stimulation inhibited GLP-1 secretion, an effect abolished by phentolamine. Norepinephrine inhibited secretion, and phentolamine abolished this effect. GLP-1 secretion was stimulated by isoproterenol (abolished by propranolol). Acetylcholine stimulated GLP-1 secretion, and atropine blocked this effect. Dimethylphenylpiperazine stimulated GLP-1 secretion. In chloralose-anesthetized pigs, however, electrical stimulation of the vagal trunks at the level of the diaphragm had no effect on GLP-1 or GLP-2 and weak effects on glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and somatostatin secretion, although this elicited a marked atropine-resistant release of the neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal polypeptide to the portal circulation. Thus GLP-1 secretion is inhibited by the sympathetic nerves to the gut and may be stimulated by intrinsic cholinergic nerves, whereas the extrinsic vagal supply has no effect.     

Transformation of postingestive glucose responses after deletion of sweet taste receptor subunits or gastric bypass surgery

The glucose-dependent secretion of the insulinotropic hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a critical step in the regulation of glucose homeostasis. Two molecular mechanisms have separately been suggested as the primary mediator of intestinal glucose-stimulated GLP-1 secretion (GSGS): one is a metabotropic mechanism requiring the sweet taste receptor type 2 (T1R2) + type 3 (T1R3) while the second is a metabolic mechanism requiring ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels. By quantifying sugar-stimulated hormone secretion in receptor knockout mice and in rats receiving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), we found that both of these mechanisms contribute to GSGS; however, the mechanisms exhibit different selectivity, regulation, and localization. T1R3(-/-) mice showed impaired glucose and insulin homeostasis during an oral glucose challenge as well as slowed insulin granule exocytosis from isolated pancreatic islets. Glucose, fructose, and sucralose evoked GLP-1 secretion from T1R3(+/+), but not T1R3(-/-), ileum explants; this secretion was not mimicked by the K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide. T1R2(-/-) mice showed normal glycemic control and partial small intestine GSGS, suggesting that T1R3 can mediate GSGS without T1R2. Robust GSGS that was K(ATP) channel-dependent and glucose-specific emerged in the large intestine of T1R3(-/-) mice and RYGB rats in association with elevated fecal carbohydrate throughout the distal gut. Our results demonstrate that the small and large intestines utilize distinct mechanisms for GSGS and suggest novel large intestine targets that could mimic the improved glycemic control seen after RYGB.     

Add-on therapy with anagliptin in Japanese patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus treated with metformin and miglitol can maintain higher concentrations of biologically active GLP-1/total GIP and a lower concentration of leptin

Metformin, α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) reduce hyperglycemia without excessive insulin secretion, and enhance postprandial plasma concentration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We assessed add-on therapeutic effects of DPP-4I anagliptin in Japanese T2DM patients treated with metformin, an α-GI miglitol, or both drugs on postprandial responses of GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and on plasma concentration of the appetite-suppressing hormone leptin. Forty-two Japanese T2DM patients with inadequately controlled disease (HbA1c: 6.5%–8.0%) treated with metformin (n = 14), miglitol (n = 14) or a combination of the two drugs (n = 14) received additional treatment with anagliptin (100 mg, p.o., b.i.d.) for 52 weeks. We assessed glycemic control, postprandial responses of GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and on plasma concentration of leptin in those patients. Add-on therapy with anagliptin for 52 weeks improved glycemic control and increased the area under the curve of biologically active GLP-1 concentration without altering obesity indicators. Total GIP concentration at 52 weeks was reduced by add-on therapy in groups treated with miglitol compared with those treated with metformin. Add-on therapy reduced leptin concentrations. Add-on therapy with anagliptin in Japanese T2DM patients treated with metformin and miglitol for 52 weeks improved glycemic control and enhanced postprandial concentrations of active GLP-1/total GIP, and reduce the leptin concentration.     

Comparison of the subchronic antidiabetic effects of DPP IV-resistant GIP and GLP-1 analogues in obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are the two key incretin hormones released from the gastrointestinal tract that regulate blood glucose homeostasis through potent insulin secretion. The rapid degradation of GIP and GLP-1 by the ubiquitous enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) renders both peptides noninsulinotropic. However, DPP IV stable agonists, such as N-AcGIP and (Val8)GLP-1, have now been developed. The present study has examined and compared the metabolic effects of subchronic administration of daily i.p. injections of N-AcGIP, (Val8) GLP-1 and a combination of both peptides (all at 25 nmol/kg bw) in obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice. Initial in vitro experiments confirmed the potent insulinotropic properties of N-AcGIP and (Val8)GLP-1 in the clonal pancreatic BRIN BD11 cell line. Subchronic administration of N-AcGIP, (Val8)GLP-1 or combined peptide administration had no significant effects on the body weight, food intake and plasma insulin concentrations. However, all treatment groups had significantly (p < 0.05) decreased plasma glucose levels and improved glucose tolerance by day 14. The effectiveness of the peptide groups was similar, and glucose concentrations were substantially reduced following injection of insulin to assess insulin sensitivity compared to control. These results provide evidence for an improvement of glucose homeostasis following treatment with enzyme-resistant GIP and GLP-1 analogues.     

Role of incretin hormones in the regulation of insulin secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic humans

The available evidence suggests that about two-thirds of the insulin response to an oral glucose load is due to the potentiating effect of gut-derived incretin hormones. The strongest candidates for the incretin effect are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). In patients with type 2 diabetes, however, the incretin effect is lost or greatly impaired. It is hypothesized that this loss explains an important part of the impaired insulin secretion in patients. Further analysis of the incretin effects in patients has revealed that the secretion of GIP is near normal, whereas the secretion of GLP-1 is decreased. On the other hand, the insulintropic effect of GLP-1 is preserved, whereas the effect of GIP is greatly reduced, mainly because of a complete loss of the normal GIP-induced potentiation of second-phase insulin secretion. These two features, therefore, explain the incretin defect of type 2 diabetes. Strong support for the hypothesis that the defect plays an important role in the insulin deficiency of patients is provided by the finding that administration of excess GLP-1 to patients may completely restore the glucose-induced insulin secretion as well as the beta-cells' sensitivity to glucose. Because of this, analogs of GLP-1 or GLP-1 receptor activations are currently being developed for diabetes treatment, so far with very promising results.     

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on insulin secretion

The insulinotropic actions of two forms of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) containing 31 and 37 amino acid residues on perfused rat pancreas were compared with that of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), hitherto the most potent intestinal insulinotropic polypeptide known. The smaller form, C-terminally amidated GLP-1-(7-36), strongly enhanced insulin secretion stimulated by 11.1 mM D-glucose at a concentration as low as 0.1 nM. Comparable effects of GIP and GLP-1-(1-37) on insulin secretion were observed at concentrations of 1.0 nM and 10.0 nM, respectively. At the doses tested, neither GLP-1s nor GIP had any effect on insulin secretion induced by 3.3 mM D-glucose. At a concentration of 1.0 nM, GLP-1-(7-36 amide) also enhanced insulin secretion induced by 5 mM L-arginine whereas at concentrations of up to 10.0 nM, GLP-1-(1-37) did not. The results show that the smaller form of GLP-1 is more strongly insulinotropic than GIP. These findings suggest that the smaller GLP-1 may have a physiologically more important role as a modulator of insulin release.     

Impact of incretin hormones on beta-cell function in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance

The mechanisms by which the enteroinsular axis influences beta-cell function have not been investigated in detail. We performed oral and isoglycemic intravenous (IV) glucose administration in subjects with normal (NGT; n = 11) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 10), using C-peptide deconvolution to calculate insulin secretion rates and mathematical modeling to quantitate beta-cell function. The incretin effect was taken to be the ratio of oral to IV responses. In NGT, incretin-mediated insulin release [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)/IV ratio = 1.59 +/- 0.18, P = 0.004] amounted to 18 +/- 2 nmol/m(2) (32 +/- 4% of oral response), and its time course matched that of total insulin secretion. The beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.52 +/- 0.26, P = 0.02), rate sensitivity (response to glucose rate of change, OGTT/IV ratio = 2.22 +/- 0.37, P = 0.06), and glucose-independent potentiation were markedly higher with oral than IV glucose. In IGT, beta-cell glucose sensitivity (75 +/- 14 vs. 156 +/- 28 pmol.min(-1).m(-2).mM(-1) of NGT, P = 0.01) and potentiation were impaired on the OGTT. The incretin effect was not significantly different from NGT in terms of plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses, total insulin secretion, and enhancement of beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.73 +/- 0.24, P = NS vs. NGT). However, the time courses of incretin-mediated insulin secretion and potentiation were altered, with a predominance of glucose-induced vs. incretin-mediated stimulation. We conclude that, under physiological circumstances, incretin-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion results from an enhancement of all dynamic aspects of beta-cell function, particularly beta-cell glucose sensitivity. In IGT, beta-cell function is inherently impaired, whereas the incretin effect is only partially affected.     

Regional specificity of the gut-incretin response to small intestinal glucose infusion in healthy older subjects

The importance of the region, as opposed to the length, of small intestine exposed to glucose in determining the secretion of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) remains unclear. We sought to compare the glycemic, insulinemic and incretin responses to glucose administered to the proximal (12–60 cm beyond the pylorus), or more distal ( > 70 cm beyond the pylorus) small intestine, or both. 10 healthy subjects (9M,1F; aged 70.3 ± 1.4 years) underwent infusion of glucose via a catheter into the proximal (glucose proximally; GP), or distal (glucose distally; GD) small intestine, or both (GPD), on three separate days in a randomised fashion. Blood glucose, serum insulin and plasma GLP-1, GIP and CCK responses were assessed. The iAUC for blood glucose was greater in response to GPD than GP (P < 0.05), with no difference between GD and GP. GP was associated with minimal GLP-1 response (P = 0.05), but substantial increases in GIP, CCK and insulin (P < 0.001 for all). GPD and GD both stimulated GLP-1, GIP, CCK and insulin (P < 0.001 for all). Compared to GP, GPD induced greater GLP-1, GIP and CCK responses (P < 0.05 for all). Compared with GPD, GD was associated with greater GLP-1 (P < 0.05), but reduced GIP and CCK (P < 0.05 for both), responses. We conclude that exposure of glucose to the distal small intestine appears necessary for substantial GLP-1 secretion, while exposure of both the proximal and distal small intestine result in substantial secretion of GIP.     

Intracerebroventricular infusion of neuropeptide Y increases glucose dependent-insulinotropic peptide secretion in the fasting conscious dog

The rapid increase of incretins glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1), within 5-15 min, after food ingestion, suggests that a neural mechanism might be involved in the regulation of their secretion. The aim of this study is to determine whether intracerebroventricular (i.c.v) administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY), a widely distributed neurotransmmiter, can mediate this neural regulation of GIP secretion after food consumption. Six healthy mongrel dogs were utilized for this study. A prototype epicranial apparatus was placed surgically, allowing easy and exact localization of the third ventricle for infusions or sampling. Simultaneous blood sampling was obtained from cannulation of a hind limb vein. Plasma insulin, and GIP concentrations were measured after i.c.v infusion of 5, 10 and 25 microg of NPY dissolved in 0.5 ml of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (a CSF). The secretion of GIP and insulin were increased after the injection of NPY in a different pattern. Our data indicate that NPY might be involved in a possible neural control mechanism of GIP secretion after food consumption.     

Incretin hormones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Part I: influence of insulinotropic gut-derived hormones (incretins) on glucose metabolism

Insulinotropic gut-derived hormones (incretins) play a significant role in the regulation of glucose homeostasis in healthy subjects and are responsible for 50-70% of insulin response to a meal. The main mediators of the incretin effect are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). However, in patients with type 2 diabetes the effect of incretins action is to a large extent impaired, which seems to explain disturbed secretional activity of beta cells in pancreatic islets. Detailed analysis of incretin defect proved that GIP secretion remains within physiological limits, whereas GLP-1 secretion is significantly decreased. Nevertheless, GLP-1 insulinotropic effect is preserved and GIP effect is significantly impaired. In consequence, substitutional GLP-1 administration aiming at the reduction of its deficiency, seems to be logical therapeutic management, because despite a physiologically retained quantity response from GIP, resistance to this peptide is frequently found. Therefore, particularly promising are the results of clinical studies with the use of GLP-1 analogues , GLP-1 receptors activation, as well as the inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP IV), the enzyme responsible for incretin proteolysis, which restores the proper function of the intestinal-pancreatic axis in subjects with type 2 diabetes and creates new possibilities of a glycaemia reducing therapy and improvement in quality of life in this group of patients.     

Two incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP: comparison of their actions in insulin secretion and β cell preservation

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the two primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestine upon ingestion of glucose or nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells. GIP and GLP-1 exert their effects by binding to their specific receptors, the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R), which belong to the G-protein coupled receptor family. Receptor binding activates and increases the level of intracellular cAMP in pancreatic β cells, thereby stimulating insulin secretion glucose-dependently. In addition to their insulinotropic effects, GIP and GLP-1 have been shown to preserve pancreatic β cell mass by inhibiting apoptosis of β cells and enhancing their proliferation. Due to such characteristics, incretin hormones have been gaining mush attention as attractive targets for treatment of type 2 diabetes, and indeed incretin-based therapeutics have been rapidly disseminated worldwide. However, despites of plethora of rigorous studies, molecular mechanisms underlying how GIPR and GLP-1R activation leads to enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion are still largely unknown. Here, we summarize the similarities and differences of these two incretin hormones in secretion and metabolism, their insulinotropic actions and their effects on pancreatic β cell preservation. We then try to discuss potential of GLP-1 and GIP in treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

A Novel Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Hybrid Peptide with Triple-acting Agonist Activity at Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide,GLP-1, and Glucagon Receptors and Therapeutic Potential in High Fat-fed Mice

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon bind to related members of the same receptor superfamily and exert important effects on glucose homeostasis, insulin secretion, and energy regulation. The present study assessed the biological actions and therapeutic utility of novel GIP/glucagon/GLP-1 hybrid peptides. Nine novel peptides were synthesized and exhibited complete DPP-IV resistance and enhanced in vitro insulin secretion. The most promising peptide, [dA²]GLP-1/GcG, stimulated cAMP production in GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptor-transfected cells. Acute administration of [dA²]GLP-1/GcG in combination with glucose significantly lowered plasma glucose and increased plasma insulin in normal and obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice. Furthermore, [dA²]GLP-1/GcG elicited a protracted glucose-lowering and insulinotropic effect in high fat-fed mice. Twice daily administration of [dA²]GLP-1/GcG for 21 days decreased body weight and nonfasting plasma glucose and increased circulating plasma insulin concentrations in high fat-fed mice. Furthermore, [dA²]GLP-1/GcG significantly improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity by day 21. Interestingly, locomotor activity was increased in [dA²]GLP-1/GcG mice, without appreciable changes in aspects of metabolic rate. Studies in knock-out mice confirmed the biological action of [dA²]GLP-1/GcG via multiple targets including GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptors. The data suggest significant promise for novel triple-acting hybrid peptides as therapeutic options for obesity and diabetes.     

Incretin hormones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Part II. Incretins - new possibilities for pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes

In the pathogenesis of diabetes type 2, increasing insulin resistance is accompanied by dysfunction of pancreatic islet b cells. It is hypothesized that at the basis of this pathology lies an incretin defect of insulinotropic gut-derived hormones, relying on decreased secretion of GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1), with preserved insulinotropic effect, whereas GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) secretion remains within physiological limits, but its action is mostly impaired due to total loss of possibility for stimulation of the second phase insulin secretion. Possibilities for pharmacological correction of incretin defect create an opportunity of causative treatment of diabetes and provide basis for development of research on a new group of drugs which promote hypoglycemia. In the presence of these findings there are many ongoing clinical studies with the use of GLP-1 analogues or GLP-1 receptors activators (GLP-1 agonists), as well as the inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV), the enzyme responsible for incretin proteolysis, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Multidirectional, glucoregulative mechanism of action of these drugs, aiming at the pathogenesis of the disease, restores the proper function of the intestinal-pancreatic axis in subjects with type 2 diabetes and ensures good metabolic control and improvement in quality of life in this group of patients.     

Role of the foregut in the early improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

Bypass of the foregut following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery results in altered nutrient absorption, which is proposed to underlie the improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. We conducted a prospective crossover study in which a mixed meal was delivered orally before RYGB (gastric) and both orally (jejunal) and by gastrostomy tube (gastric) postoperatively (1 and 6 wk) in nine subjects. Glucose, insulin, and incretin responses were measured, and whole-body insulin sensitivity was estimated with the insulin sensitivity index composite. RYGB resulted in an improved glucose, insulin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) area under the curve (AUC) in the first 6 wk postoperatively (all P ≤ 0.018); there was no effect of delivery route (all P ≥ 0.632) or route × time interaction (all P ≥ 0.084). The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) AUC was unchanged after RYGB (P = 0.819); however, GIP levels peaked earlier after RYGB with jejunal delivery. The ratio of insulin AUC to GLP-1 and GIP AUC decreased after surgery (P =.001 and 0.061, respectively) without an effect of delivery route over time (both P ≥ 0.646). Insulin sensitivity improved post-RYGB (P = 0.001) with no difference between the gastric and jejunal delivery of the mixed meal over time (P = 0.819). These data suggest that exclusion of nutrients from the foregut with RYGB does not improve glucose tolerance or insulin sensitivity. However, changes in the foregut response post-RYGB due to lack of nutrient exposure cannot be excluded. Our findings suggest that foregut bypass may alter the incretin response by enhanced nutrient delivery to the hindgut.