Streptozotocin-induced diabetes selectively enhances antinociception mediated by δ1-but not δ2-opioid receptors

We assessed the effect of diabetes on antinociception produced by intracerebroventricular injection of δ-opioid receptor agonists [D-Pen^2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and [D-Ala²]deltorphin II. The antinociceptive effect of DPDPE (10 nmol), administered i.c.v., was significantly greater in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. DPDPE was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX), a selective δ₁-opioid receptor antagonist, but not with naltriben (NTB), a selective δ₂- opioid receptor antagonist. There were no significant differences in the anticiceptive effect of [D-Ala²]deltorphin II (3 nmol, i.c.v.) in diabetic and non-diabetic mice. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. [D-Ala²]deltorphin II was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with NTB, but not with BNTX. In conclusion, mice with diabetes are selectively hyper-responsive to supraspinal δ₁-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception, but are normally responsive to activation of δ₂-opiod receptors.     

In vivo characterization of the effects of ghrelin on the modulation of acute pain at the supraspinal level in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated peptide produced in the stomach, increases food intake and growth hormone secretion, inhibits pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin and its receptor (GHS-R1a) mRNA were found in the area related to the regions for controlling pain transmission, such as the hypothalamus, the midbrain, the spinal cord, etc. Ghrelin has been shown to have antinociceptive activity and also anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ghrelin for the first time in the acute pain modulation at the supraspinal level, using the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test in mice. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ghrelin (mouse, 0.1–3 nmol) produced a dose- and time-related antinociceptive effect in the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test, respectively. Antinociceptive effect elicited by ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol) was significantly antagonized by opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (i.c.v., 10 nmol co-injection or i.p., 10 mg/kg, 10 min prior to ghrelin) in both tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test. At these doses, naloxone significantly antagonized the antinociceptive effect induced by morphine (i.c.v., 3 nmol). Ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol)-induced antinociception was significantly antagonized by co-injection with 10 nmol [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6, the selective antagonist of GHS-R1a identified more recently, while [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6 (10 nmol) alone induced neither hyperalgesia nor antinociception. Overall this data indicate that ghrelin could produce antinociception through an interaction with GHS-R1a and with the central opioid system. Thus ghrelin may be a promising peptide for developing new analgesic drugs.     

Attenuation of systemic morphine-induced analgesia by central administration of ghrelin and related peptides in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated 28-amino peptide secreted in the gastric endocrine cells, has been demonstrated to stimulate the release of growth hormone, increase food intake, and inhibit pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin mainly combines with its receptor (GHS-R1α) to play the role in physiological and pathological functions. It has been reported that ghrelin plays important roles in the control of pain through interaction with the opioid system in inflammatory pain and acute pain. However, very few studies show the effect of supraspinal ghrelin system on antinociception induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. In the present study, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of ghrelin (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 nmol/L) produced inhibition of systemic morphine (6 mg/kg, i.p.) analgesia in the tail withdrawal test. Similarly, i.c.v. injection GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 which are the agonists of GHS-R1α, also decreased analgesia effect induced by morphine injected intraperitoneally in mice. Furthermore, these anti-opioid activities of ghrelin and related peptides were not blocked by pretreatment with the GHS-R1α selective antagonist [d-Lys³]-GHRP-6 (100 nmol/L, i.c.v.). These results demonstrated that central ghrelin and related peptides could inhibit the analgesia effect induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. The anti-opioid effects of ghrelin and related peptides do not interact with GHS-R1a. These findings may pave the way for a new strategy on investigating the interaction between ghrelin system and opioids on pain modulation.     

Pharmacological characterization of the ghrelin receptor mediating its inhibitory action on inflammatory pain in rats

Recent research suggests a role for ghrelin in the modulation of inflammatory disorders. However, the type of ghrelin receptor (GHS-R) involved in both the anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperalgesic actions of ghrelin remains to be characterized. In this study, we examined whether the inhibitory effect of ghrelin in the development of hyperalgesia and edema induced by intraplantar carrageenan administration depends on an interaction with GHS-R1a. Both central (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of the selective GHS-R1a agonist EP1572 had no effect on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia measured by Randall–Selitto test and paw edema. Furthermore, pre-treatment with the selective GHS-R1a antagonist, d-lys³-GHRP-6 (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) failed to prevent the anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects exerted by central ghrelin administration (1 nmol/rat), thus indicating that the type 1a GHS-R is not involved in these peptide activities. Accordingly, both central (1 and 2 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 and 80 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of desacyl-ghrelin (DAG), which did not bind GHS-R1a, induced a significant reduction of the hyperalgesic and edematous activities of carrageenan. In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that DAG shares with ghrelin an inhibitory role in the development of hyperalgesia, as well as the paw edema induced by carrageenan and that a ghrelin receptor different from type 1a is involved in the anti-inflammatory activities of the peptide.     

Use of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to determine δ-opioid receptor involvement in [d-Ala2]deltorphin II-induced locomotor hyperactivity

Intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.)-administered [d-Ala²]deltorphin II (20 μg) produced a marked locomotor hyperactivity in male ICR mice. The locomotor hyperactivity induced in response to i.c.v. [d-Ala²]deltorphin II (20 μg) was suppressed by pretreatment with naltriben (NTB, 10 μg) but not 7-benzylidene naltrexone (BNTX, 1 μg) and d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Try-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH₂ (CTOP, 100 ng). The influence of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to δ-opioid receptor mRNA (δ-AS oligo) or a mismatch oligodeoxynucleotide (MM oligo) on the locomotor hyperactivity induced by [d-Ala²]deltorphin II was determined. Groups of mice pretreated i.c.v. with δ-AS oligo (1 μg), MM oligo (1 μg) or saline (4 μl) once a day for 3 days, were injected i.c.v. [d-Ala²]deltorphin II (10 or 20 μg) and the locomotor response to [d-Ala²]deltorphin II was measured. The locomotor hyperactivity of i.c.v. [d-Ala²]deltorphin II (10 or 20 μg) were significantly suppressed by i.c.v. pretreatment with δ-AS oligo but not MM oligo. The present results indicate that pretreatment with δ-AS oligo suppresses mouse locomotor hyperactivity produced by stimulation of δ₂-opioid receptors in the brain.     

Antinociceptive effects of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II, a highly selective delta agonist in vivo

The present study has characterized the antinociceptive actions of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in the mouse tail-flick test. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced dose- and time-related antinociception, with maximal effects at +10 min and significant antinociception which lasted for 40-60 min. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II was 13-fold more potent than i.c.v. [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), a second highly selective delta agonist, and approximately equipotent with i.c.v. morphine in producing antinociception. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE, but not those of morphine, were antagonized by the selective delta antagonist, ICI 174,864. In contrast, pretreatment with the non-equilibrium mu antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine blocked morphine antinociception, but failed to antagonize [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE antinociception. These data indicate that [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced its antinociceptive effects at a supraspinal delta receptor. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II appears to be the most appropriate delta opioid agonist currently available for studies in vivo and support the involvement of delta receptors in supraspinal antinociception.     

D-Lys-GHRP-6 antagonizes the effect of unacylated but not of acylated ghrelin on the growth of HECa10 murine endothelial cells

Recent studies demonstrate that ghrelin can be an endogenous regulator of angiogenesis. We studied direct effects of human acylated (hAG) and unacylated (hUAG) ghrelin, as well as of rat acylated ghrelin (rAG) on the growth of HECa10 murine endothelial cells. Ghrelin was applied separately or together with D-Lys³-GHRP-6, which is commonly used as an antagonist of ghrelin receptor type 1a – GHS-R1a. The growth of HECa10 cells was assessed with Mosmann and in selected study conditions also with BrdU and TUNEL methods. Both hAG and hUAG (10⁻⁵ M to 10⁻¹² M) inhibited the growth of HECa10 cells in 24 h and 72 h cultures. Similarly, rAG decreased the growth of the cells after 24 h (10⁻⁷ M and 10⁻¹¹ M), and after 72 h (10⁻⁷ M, 10⁻⁸ M and 10⁻¹¹ M). Unexpectedly, D-Lys³-GHRP-6 itself also inhibited the growth of these cells at 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁶ M in 24 h, 48 h (dose–response effect) and 72 h cultures. D-Lys³-GHRP-6 did not modify the inhibitory effect of rAG. However, D-Lys³-GHRP-6 at the concentration of 10⁻⁴ M diminished, abolished or even reversed the inhibitory effect of hUAG in 72 h culture and this was dependent on ghrelin concentrations. These data indicate that both AG and UAG have antiangiogenic properties at least at the level of endothelial growth, through decreased metabolic activity of the cells or stimulation of apoptosis. D-Lys³-GHRP-6 (inhibitor of GHS-R1a) seems not to be an appropriate antagonist in this experimental condition. Similar effects of these substances on HECa10 cells suggest that they are not mediated by GHS-R1a.     

Selective inhibition of [D-ALA2, GLU4]deltrophin antinociception by supraspinal,but not spinal,administration of an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to an opioid delta receptor

Evidence in vivo has suggested the existence of subtypes of the δ opioid receptor (DOR), which have been termed δ₁ and δ₂. These proposed DOR subtypes are thought to be activated by [D-Pen², D- Pen⁵]enkephalin (DPDPE, δ₁) and [D-Ala², Glu⁴]deltorphin (δ₂). Recent work in which an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (oligo) to a cloned DOR was administered by the intrathecal (i.th.) route has demonstrated a reduction in the antinociceptive actions of both i.th. DPDPE and [D-Ala², Glu⁴]deltorphin, but not of [D-Ala², NMPhe⁴, Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO, μ agonist) in mice. The present investigation has extended these observations by administering the same DOR antisense oligo sequence by the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route and evaluating the antinociceptive actions of i.c.v. agonist selective for δ, μ and κ receptors. I.th. treatment with DOR antisense oligo, but not mismatch oligo, significantly inhibited the antinociceptive actions of both i.th. DPDPE and [D-Ala², Glu⁴deltorphin but not of i.th. DAMGO or U69, 593 (κ agonist), confirming previous data. In contrast, i.c.v. DOR antisense oligo, but not mismatch oligo, seletively inhibited the anitinociceptive response to i.c.v. [D-Ala², Glu⁴]deltorphin without altering the antinociceptive actions of i.c.v. DPDPE, DAMGO or U69,593. The data suggest that the cloned DOR corresponds to that pharmacologically classified as δ₂ and further, suggest that this δ receptor subtype may play a major role in eliciting spinal δ-mediated antinociception.     

Calcium signals activated by ghrelin and D-Lys-GHRP-6 ghrelin antagonist in developing dorsal root ganglion glial cells

Ghrelin is a hormone regulating energy homeostasis via interaction with its receptor, GHSR-1a. Ghrelin activities in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cells are unknown. Herein we show that ghrelin induces a change of cytosolic calcium concentration in both glia and neurons of embryonic chick DRG. Both RT-PCR and binding studies performed with fluorescent ghrelin in the presence of either unlabeled ghrelin or GHSR-1a antagonist D-Lys³-GHRP-6, indicate that DRG cells express GHSR-1a. In glial cells the response is characterized by a rapid transient rise in [Ca²⁺]_i followed by a long lasting rise. The calcium elevation is dependent on calcium release from thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular stores and on activation of two distinct Ca²⁺ entry pathways, a receptor activated calcium entry and a store operated calcium entry. Surprisingly, D-Lys³-GHRP-6 exerts several activities in the absence of exogenous ghrelin: (i) it activates calcium release from thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular stores and calcium entry via voltage-operated channels in non-neuronal cells; (ii) it inhibits calcium oscillations in non-neuronal cells exhibiting spontaneous Ca²⁺ activity and iii) it promotes apoptosis of DRG cells, both neurons and glia. In summary, we provide the first evidence for ghrelin activity in DRG, and we also demonstrate that the widely used D-Lys³-GHRP-6 ghrelin antagonist features ghrelin independent activities.     

Supraspinal antinociceptive effect of apelin-13 in a mouse visceral pain model

Apelin, as the endogenous ligand of the APJ receptor, is a novel identified neuropeptide whose biological functions are not fully understood. APJ receptor mRNA was found in several brain regions related to descending control system of pain, such as amygdala, hypothalamus and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). The present study was designed to determine whether supraspinal apelin-13 may produce antinociceptive effect observed in the acetic acid-induced writhing test, a model of visceral pain. Apelin-13 not only significantly produced preemptive antinociception at the dose of 0.3, 0.5, 1 and 3μg/mouse when injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) before acetic acid, but also significantly induced antinociception at a dose of 0.5, 1 and 3μg/mouse when injected i.c.v. after acetic acid. And i.c.v. apelin-13 did not influence 30-min locomotor activity counts in mice. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of apelin-13 (1 and 3μg/mouse) significantly decreased the number of writhes, however, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of apelin-13 (10-100μg/mouse) had no effect on the number of writhes in the writhing test. The specific APJ receptor antagonist apelin-13(F13A), no-specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine hydrochloride (β-FNA) could significantly antagonize the antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. apelin-13, suggesting APJ receptor and μ-opioid receptor are involved in this process. Central low dose of apelin-13 (0.3μg/mouse, i.c.v.) could significantly potentiate the analgesic potencies of modest and even relatively ineffective doses of morphine administrated at supraspinal level. This enhanced antinociceptive effect was reversed by naloxone, suggesting that the potentiated analgesic response is mediated by opioid-responsive neurons.     

Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites

Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms of fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at both supraspinal and spinal sites. In the mouse tail-flick test, the antinociceptive effects induced by both fentanyl and morphine were blocked by either the mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the mu1/mu2-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) after s.c., i.c.v. or i.t. injection. In contrast, both fentanyl and morphine given i.c.v. or i.t. failed to produce antinociception in mu1-deficient CXBK mice. These findings indicate that like morphine, the antinociception induced by fentanyl may be mediated predominantly through mu1-opioid receptors at both supraspinal and spinal sites in mice. We also determined the ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception in mice. The ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl-induced antinociception were 73.7, 18.5 and 1.2-fold lower than that of morphine, respectively. The present data clearly suggest the usefulness of peripheral treatment with fentanyl for the control of pain.     

Antinociceptive effects of two deltorphins analogs in the tail-immersion test in rats

The antinociceptive effects of analogs of deltorphins: cyclo(Nδ,Nδ-carbonyl-d-Orn2, Orn4)deltorphin (DEL-6) and deltorphin II N-(ureidoethyl)amide (DK-4) after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration were investigated in the tail-immersion test in rats. Morphine, the most commonly used μ-opioid receptors (MOR) agonist, was employed as a reference compound. The contribution of the MOR, δ-(DOR) and κ-opioid receptors (KOR) in antinociceptive effects of the deltorphins analogs was studies using selective antagonists of these receptors. The results indicated that DK-4 (5, 10 and 20 nmol) and DEL-6 (5, 10 and 20 nmol) were the most effective in alleviating thermal pain at the dose of 20 nmol. The antinociceptive potency of DEL-6 at the dose of 20 nmol was approximately equal but DK-4 at the dose of 20 nmol was less effective than morphine at the dose of 13 nmol. DOR antagonist – naltrindole (NTI, 5 nmol) very strongly and, to the lower extent MOR antagonist – β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA, 5 nmol), inhibited antinociceptive effect of DK-4 (20 nmol). In turn, β-FNA was more potent than NTI in inhibition of the antinociceptive effects of DEL-6. Co-administration of DEL-6 and morphine at doses of 5 nmol, which do not produce measurable antinociception, generated additive antinociceptive effect. Chronic intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of morphine (9 days) displayed a marked analgesic tolerance to the challenge dose of morphine and a slight cross-tolerance to challenge doses of DEL-6 and DK-4, given i.c.v. These findings indicate that the new deltorphin analogs recruit DOR and MOR to attenuate the nociceptive response to acute thermal stimuli.     

Spinal δ2 but not δ1 opioid receptors are involved in intracereboventricular β-endorphin-induced antinociception in the mouse

The antinociception induced by β-endorphin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) has been previously demonstrated to be mediated by the release of Met-enkephalin and subsequent stimulation of δ receptors in the spinal cord for antinociception. The present study was designed to determine what type of opioid receptor, δ1 or δ2, in the spinal cord is involved in i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception. Antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test in male ICR mice. NTB (0.2–20 nmol) and NTI0 (0.22–2.2 nmol),selective δ2 receptor antagonists, given intrathecally (i.t.) dose-dependently attenuated i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. On the other hand, BNTX (0.02–2.2 nmol), a selective δ1 receptor antagonist, given i.t., did not block i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception. The tail-flick inhibition induced by DAMGO, a μ receptor agonist, or U50,488H, a к receptor agonist, was not blocked by i.t. BNTX, NTB or NTI. It is concluded that δ2 but not δ1 receptors in the spinal cord are involved in i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception.     

Effects of morphine-3-glucuronide on the antinociceptive activity of peptide and nonpeptide opioid receptor agonists in mice

The effects of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), a metabolite of morphine, were determined on the antinociceptive actions, as measured by the tail flick test, of morphine, a μ-opioid receptor agonist, of U-50,488H, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, of [ -Pen², -Pen⁵]enkephalin (DPDPE), a δ₁-opioid receptor agonist, and of [ -Ala²,Glu⁴]deltorphin II (deltorphin II), a δ₂-opioid receptor agonist in mice. Morphine administered ICV (2.5 μg/mouse) or SC (10 mg/kg), U-50,488H (25 mg/kg, IP), DPDPE (15 μg/mouse; ICV), and deltorphin II (15 μg/mouse, ICV) produced antinociception in mice. Intraperitoneal or ICV injections of M3G did not produce any effect on the tail flick latency nor did it affect the antinociception-induced by morphine, U-50,488H, DPDPE, or deltorphin II. Previously M3G has been shown to antagonize the antinociceptive effects of morphine in the rat. It is concluded that in the mouse, M3G neither produces hyperalgesia nor modifies the actions of μ-, κ-, δ₁-, or δ₂-opioid receptor agonists.     

Involvement of spinal release of α-neo-endorphin on the antinociceptive effect of TAPA

The antinociceptive effect of i.t.-administered Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-β-Ala (TAPA), an N-terminal tetrapeptide analog of dermorphin, was characterized in ddY mice. In the mouse tail-flick test, TAPA administered i.t. produced a potent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, as well as by the μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine and the μ₁-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine. TAPA-induced antinociception was also significantly suppressed by co-administration of the μ₁-opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-d-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH₂ (d-Pro²-endomorphin-2) but not by co-administration of the μ₂-opioid receptor antagonists Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH₂ (d-Pro²-endomorphin-1) and Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH₂ (d-Pro²-Tyr-W-MIF-1). In CXBK mice whose μ₁-opioid receptors were naturally reduced, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was markedly suppressed compared to the parental strain C57BL/6ByJ mice. Moreover, the antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with antiserum against the endogenous κ-opioid peptide α-neo-endorphin but not antisera against other endogenous opioid peptides. In prodynorphin-deficient mice, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was significantly reduced compared to wild-type mice. These results suggest that the spinal antinociception induced by TAPA is mediated in part through the release of α-neo-endorphin in the spinal cord via activation of spinal μ₁-opioid receptors.     

Food restriction,ghrelin, its antagonist and obestatin control expression of ghrelin and its receptor in chicken hypothalamus and ovary

The purpose of the present study was to identify the role of age, nutritional state and some metabolic hormones in control of avian hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/ghrelin receptor system. We examined the effect of food restriction, administration of ghrelin 1–18, ghrelin antagonistic analogue (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, obestatin and combinations of them on the expression of ghrelin and ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in hypothalamus and ovary of old (23 months of age) and young (7 months of age) chickens. Expression of mRNAs for ghrelin and GHS-R1a in both hypothalamus and largest ovarian follicle was measured by RT-PCR. It was observed that food restriction could promote the expression of ghrelin and GHS-R1a in hypothalamus and ovary of the old chickens, but in the young chickens it reduced expression of ghrelin and did not affect expression of GHS-R1a in the ovary. Administration of ghrelin 1–18 did not affect hypothalamic or ovarian ghrelin mRNA, but significantly increased the expression of GHS-R1a in hypothalamus, but not in ovary. (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, significantly stimulated accumulation of ghrelin, but not GHS-R1a mRNA in hypothalamus or ghrelin or GHS-R1a in the ovary. Ghrelin 1–18 and (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, when given together, were able either to prevent or to induce effect of these hormones. Obestatin administration increased expression of ghrelin gene in the hypothalamus, but not expression of hypothalamic GHS-R1a, ovarian ghrelin and GHS-R1a. Furthermore, obestatin was able to modify effect of both ghrelin and fasting on hypothalamic and ovarian mRNA for ghrelin GHS-R1a. Our results (1) confirm the existence of ghrelin and its functional receptors GHS-R1a in the chicken hypothalamus and ovary (2) confirm the age-dependent control of ovarian ghrelin by feeding, (3) demonstrate, that nutritional status can influence the expression of both ghrelin and GHS-R1a in hypothalamus and in the ovary (3) demonstrates for the first time, that ghrelin can promote generation of its functional receptor in the hypothalamus, but not in the ovary, (4) show that ghrelin1–18 and (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6 could not only be antagonists in the action on chicken hypothalamus and ovaries, but also independent regulators and even agonists, and (5) provide first evidence for action of obestatin on hypothalamic ghrelin and on the response of hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/GHS-R1a system to food restriction. These data indicate the involvement of both hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/GHS-R1 systems in mediating the effects of nutritional status, ghrelin and obestatin on reproductive processes.     

Buprenorphine exerts its antinocicepttve activity via μ1-opioid receptors

The mechanism of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine was assessed by administering selective μ-, μ₁-, δ- and κ-opioid receptor antagonists in mice. Intraperitoneal administration of buprenorphine, at doses of 0.3 to 3 mg/kg, produced dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick test. The antinociceptive activity of buprenorphine did not result from the activation of κ- or δ-opioid receptors, since treatment with either nor-binaltorphimine, a selective κ-opioid receptor antagonist, or naltrindole, a selective δ-opioid receptor antagonist, was completely ineffective in blocking buprenorphine-induced antinociception. However, the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine was significantly antagonized by β-funaltrexamine, a selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist. Moreover, selective μ₁-opioid receptor antagonists, naloxonazine and naltrexonazine, also significantly antagonized the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine. Co-administration of κ- and δ-opioid receptor antagonists with the μ-opioid receptor antagonists had no significant effect on the antagonistic profiles of the μ-opioid receptor antagonists on the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine. These results suggest that buprenorphine acts selectively at μ₁-opioid receptors to induce antinociceptive effects in mice.     

Possible involvement of dynorphin A release via mu1-opioid receptor on supraspinal antinociception of endomorphin-2

It has been demonstrated that the antinociception induced by i.t. or i.c.v. administration of endomorphins is mediated through mu-opioid receptors. Moreover, though endomorphins do not have appreciable affinity for kappa-opioid receptors, pretreatment with the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine markedly blocks the antinociception induced by i.c.v.- or i.t.-injected endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1. These evidences propose the hypothesis that endomorphin-2 may initially stimulate the mu-opioid receptors, which subsequently induces the release of dynorphins acting on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. The present study was performed to determine whether the release of dynorphins by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2 is mediated through mu-opioid receptors for producing antinociception. Intracerebroventricular pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A, but not dynorphin B or alpha-neo-endorphin, and s.c. pretreatment with kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine dose-dependently attenuated the antinociception induced by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1 and DAMGO. The attenuation of endomorphin-2-induced antinociception by pretreatment with antiserum against dynorphin A or nor-binaltorphimine was dose-dependently eliminated by additional s.c. pretreatment with a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine or a selective mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine at ultra low doses, which are inactive against mu-opioid receptor agonists in antinociception, suggesting that endomorphin-2 stimulates distinct subclass of mu(1)-opioid receptor that induces the release of dynorphin A acting on kappa-opioid receptors in the brain. It concludes that the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered endomorphin-2 is in part mediated through the release of endogenous kappa-opioid peptide dynorphin A, which is caused by the stimulation of distinct subclass of mu(1)-opioid receptor.     

Contribution of spinal mu(1)-opioid receptors and dynorphin B to the antinociception induced by Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar

The antinociceptive effect of Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar (TAPS) at the spinal level was characterized with the mouse tail-flick test. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of TAPS produced a dose-dependent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPS was completely blocked by i.t. pretreatment with the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine, the mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, but not with the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole. Moreover, TAPS-induced antinociception was dose-dependently attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin B, but not against dynorphin A, alpha-neo-endorphin, [Met(5)]enkephalin, or [Leu(5)]enkephalin. In mice lacking prodynorphin, TAPS-induced antinociception was significantly reduced compared to that in wild-type mice. These results suggest that TAPS mainly stimulates mu(1)-opioid receptors, which subsequently induce the release of dynorphin B, which then acts on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception.     

Synergistic analgesic effects between neuronostatin and morphine at the supraspinal level

Neuronostatin, a 13-amino acid peptide, is encoded in the somatostatin pro-hormone. I.c.v. administration of neuronostatin produces a significant antinociceptive effect in the mouse tail-flick test, which is mediated by endogenous opioid receptor. However, the direct functional interaction between morphine and neuronostatin has not been characterized. In the present study, effect of neuronostatin on morphine analgesia was investigated in the tail-flick test. Our findings showed that i.c.v. administration of neuronostatin (0.3 nmol/mouse i.c.v.) significantly enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine (2.5, 5 or 10 μg/kg) at the supraspinal level. Results of antagonism experiments suggested that the synergistic analgesia induced by morphine and neuronostatin was mediated by μ- and к-opioid receptors not δ-opioid receptor. In conclusion, there may be a cascade amplification phenomenon when morphine and neuronostatin were co-administered in acute pain model. The above results provide evidence for the potential use of neuronostatin in combination with morphine to control pain and addiction.