Characterization of post-translational modifications of the linker histones H1 and H5 from chicken erythrocytes using mass spectrometry

Histone linker proteins H1 and H5 were purified from chicken erythrocyte cell nuclei under nondenaturing conditions. The purified linker histones were analyzed using in-solution enzymatic digestions followed by nanoflow reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We have identified all six major isoforms of the chicken histone H1 (H101, H102, H103, H110, H11R and H11L) and, in addition, the specialist avian isoform H5. In all the histone variants, both the acetylated and nonacetylated N (alpha)-terminal peptides were identified. Mass spectrometry analysis also enabled the identification of a wide range of post-translational modifications including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and deamidation. Furthermore, a number of amino acids were identified that were modified with both acetylation and methylation. These results highlight the extensive modifications that are present on the linker histone proteins, indicating that, similar to the core histones, post-translational modifications of the linker histones may play a role in chromatin remodelling and gene regulation.     

Chromatin compaction at the mononucleosome level

Using a previously described FRET technique, we measured the distance between the ends of DNA fragments on which nucleosomes were reconstituted from recombinant and native histones. This distance was analyzed in its dependence on the DNA fragment length, concentration of mono- and divalent counterions, presence of linker histone H1, and histone modifications. We found that the linker DNA arms do not cross under all conditions studied but diverge slightly as they leave the histone core surface. Histone H1 leads to a global approach of the linker DNA arms, confirming the notion of a "stem structure". Increasing salt concentration also leads to an approach of the linker DNAs. To study the effect of acetylation, we compared chemically acetylated recombinant histones with histones prepared from HeLa cells, characterizing the sites of acetylation by mass spectroscopy. Nucleosomes from chemically acetylated histones have few modifications in the core domain and form nucleosomes normally. Acetylating all histones or selectively only H3 causes an opening of the nucleosome structure, indicated by the larger distances between the linker DNA ends. Selective acetylation of H4 distances the linker ends for short fragments but causes them to approach each other for fragments longer than 180 bp.     

Modulation of chromatin function through linker histone H1 variants

In this review, the structural aspects of linker H1 histones are presented as a background for characterization of the factors influencing their function in animal and human chromatin. The action of H1 histone variants is largely determined by dynamic alterations of their intrinsically disordered tail domains, posttranslational modifications and allelic diversification. The interdependent effects of these factors can establish dynamic histone H1 states that may affect the organization and function of chromatin regions.     

Structure and functions of linker histones

Linker histones such as variants H1, H5, and other similar proteins play an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. However, interactions of linker histones with DNA and proteins, as well as specific functions of their different variants, are poorly studied. This is because they acquire tertiary structure only when interacting with a nucleosome, and because of limitations of currently available methods. However, deeper investigation of linker histones and their interactions with other proteins will address a number of important questions — from structure of compacted chromatin to regulation of early embryogenesis. In this review, structures of histone H1 variants and its interaction with chromatin DNA are considered. A possible functional significance of different H1 variants, a role of these proteins in maintaining interphase chromatin structure, and interactions of linker histones with other cellular proteins are also discussed.     

The vertebrate linker histones H10, H5, and H1M are descendants of invertebrate “orphon” histone H1 genes

We investigated the evolutionary history of the divergent vertebrate linker histones H1⁰, H5, and HIM. We observed that the sequence of the central conserved domain of these vertebrate proteins shares characteristic features with histone H1 proteins of plants and invertebrate animals which otherwise never appear in any vertebrate histone H1 protein. A quantitative analysis of 58 linker histone sequences also reveals that these proteins are more similar to invertebrate and plant histone H1 than to histone H1 of vertebrates. A phylogenetic tree deduced from an alignment of the central domain of all known linker histones places H1⁰, H5, and HIM in close vicinity to invertebrate sperm histone H1 proteins and to invertebrate histone H1 proteins encoded by polyadenylated mRNAs. We therefore conclude that the ancestors of the vertebrate linker histones H1⁰, H5, and HIM diverged from the main group of histone H1 proteins before the vertebrate type of histone H1 was established in evolution. We discuss this observation in the general context of linker histone evolution. Correspondence to: B. and E. Schulze     

Subnuclear distribution of the entire complement of linker histone variants in Arabidopsis thaliana

Linker histones (e.g. H1, H5, H1°) are thought to exert control on chromatin function by restricting nucleosomal dynamics. All higher eukaryotes possess a diverse family of linker histones, which may exhibit functional specialization. Arabidopsis thaliana apparently contains a minimal complement of linker histone structural variants and therefore is an ideal model for investigating functional differentiation among linker histones. Histones H1-1 and H1-2 are relatively similar proteins that are expressed in a wide variety of tissues and make up the majority of linker histone while H1-3 is a highly divergent minor variant protein that is induced by drought stress. We are interested in determining whether the in vivo distribution of each of these proteins also differs. To this end, we have produced subtype-specific antibodies and have localized each of the three proteins at the intranuclear and DNA sequence levels by indirect immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation, respectively. Antibodies against linker histones H1-1 and H1-2 decorate nuclei in patterns very similar to 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, but different than the staining pattern of total histones. In contrast, antibodies made against two regions of H1-3 bind to chromatin in a diffuse pattern distinct from the DAPI-staining pattern. We also describe a technique to determine the localization of plant linker histone variants along regions of chromatin, employing in vivo chemical DNA-protein cross-linking to preserve native associations followed by immunoprecipitation with subtype-specific antibodies. We use this technique to demonstrate that, in contrast to the major linker histones, H1-3 does not bind the repetitive sequences pAL1 and 5S rDNA. In addition, we show that linker histones are bound to the compacted nucleosomal arrays at the telomere but with reduced stoichiometry. Taken together, our results suggest that plants, as has been shown for animals, possess a variant linker histone that is differentially localized. Received: 15 April 1999 / Accepted: 1 Mai 1999     

Histone H2A ubiquitination does not preclude histone H1 binding, but it facilitates its association with the nucleosome

Histone H2A ubiquitination is a bulky posttranslational modification that occurs at the vicinity of the binding site for linker histones in the nucleosome. Therefore, we took several experimental approaches to investigate the role of ubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) in the binding of linker histones. Our results showed that uH2A was present in situ in histone H1-containing nucleosomes. Notably in vitro experiments using nucleosomes reconstituted onto 167-bp random sequence and 208-bp (5 S rRNA gene) DNA fragments showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not prevent binding of histone H1 but it rather enhanced the binding of this histone to the nucleosome. We also showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not affect the positioning of the histone octamer in the nucleosome in either the absence or the presence of linker histones.     

Histone carbonylation occurs in proliferating cells

Chromatin is a dynamic structure formed mainly by DNA and histones, and chemical modifications on these elements regulate its compaction. Histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) have a direct impact on chromatin conformation, controlling important cellular events such as cell proliferation and differentiation. Redox-related posttranslational modifications may have important effects on chromatin structure and function, offering a new intriguing area of research termed "redox epigenetics." Little is known about histone carbonylation, a PTM that may be related to modifications in the cellular redox environment. The aim of our study was to determine the carbonylation of the various histones during cell proliferation, a moment in cell life during which important redox changes take place. Here, we describe changes in histone carbonylation during cell proliferation in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. In addition, we have studied the variations of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and phospho-H2AX at the same time, because both modifications are related to DNA damage responses. High levels of carbonylation on specific histones (H1, H1(0), and H3.1 dimers) were found when cells were in an active phase of DNA synthesis. The modification decreased when nuclear proteasome activity was activated. However, these results did not correlate completely with poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and phospho-H2AX levels. Therefore, histone carbonylation may represent a specific event during cell proliferation. We describe a new methodology named oxy-2D-TAU Western blot that allowed us to separate and analyze the carbonylation patterns of the histone variants. In addition we offer a new role for histone carbonylation and its implication in redox epigenetics. Our results suggest that histone carbonylation is involved in histone detoxification during DNA synthesis.     

On your histone mark,SET, methylate!

Lysine methylation of histones and non-histone proteins has emerged in recent years as a posttranslational modification with wide-ranging cellular implications beyond epigenetic regulation. The molecular interactions between lysine methyltransferases and their substrates appear to be regulated by posttranslational modifications surrounding the lysine methyl acceptor. Two very interesting examples of this cross-talk between methyl-lysine sites are found in the SET (Su(var)3–9, Enhancer-of-zeste, Trithorax) domain-containing lysine methyltransferases SET7 and SETDB1, whereby the histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) modification prevents methylation by SETDB1 on H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and the histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 9 (H3K9^me3) modification prevents methylation by SET7 on H3K4. A similar cross-talk between posttranslational modifications regulates the functions of non-histone proteins such as the tumor suppressor p53 and the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1. Herein, in cis effects of acetylation, phosphorylation, as well as arginine and lysine methylation on lysine methylation events will be discussed.     

Differential in vivo binding dynamics of somatic and oocyte-specific linker histones in oocytes and during ES cell nuclear transfer

The embryonic genome is formed by fusion of a maternal and a paternal genome. To accommodate the resulting diploid genome in the fertilized oocyte dramatic global genome reorganizations must occur. The higher order structure of chromatin in vivo is critically dependent on architectural chromatin proteins, with the family of linker histone proteins among the most critical structural determinants. Although somatic cells contain numerous linker histone variants, only one, H1FOO, is present in mouse oocytes. Upon fertilization H1FOO rapidly populates the introduced paternal genome and replaces sperm-specific histone-like proteins. The same dynamic replacement occurs upon introduction of a nucleus during somatic cell nuclear transfer. To understand the molecular basis of this dynamic histone replacement process, we compared the localization and binding dynamics of somatic H1 and oocyte-specific H1FOO and identified the molecular determinants of binding to either oocyte or somatic chromatin in living cells. We find that although both histones associate readily with chromatin in nuclei of somatic cells, only H1FOO is capable of correct chromatin association in the germinal vesicle stage oocyte nuclei. This specificity is generated by the N-terminal and globular domains of H1FOO. Measurement of in vivo binding properties of the H1 variants suggest that H1FOO binds chromatin more tightly than somatic linker histones. We provide evidence that both the binding properties of linker histones as well as additional, active processes contribute to the replacement of somatic histones with H1FOO during nuclear transfer. These results provide the first mechanistic insights into the crucial step of linker histone replacement as it occurs during fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer.     

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions.

BACKGROUND: Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact. METHODS: A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.     

Nepsilon-formylation of lysine is a widespread post-translational modification of nuclear proteins occurring at residues involved in regulation of chromatin function

Post-translational modification of histones and other chromosomal proteins regulates chromatin conformation and gene activity. Methylation and acetylation of lysyl residues are among the most frequently described modifications in these proteins. Whereas these modifications have been studied in detail, very little is known about a recently discovered chemical modification, the N^ε-lysine formylation, in histones and other nuclear proteins. Here we mapped, for the first time, the sites of lysine formylation in histones and several other nuclear proteins. We found that core and linker histones are formylated at multiple lysyl residues located both in the tails and globular domains of histones. In core histones, formylation was found at lysyl residues known to be involved in organization of nucleosomal particles that are frequently acetylated and methylated. In linker histones and high mobility group proteins, multiple formylation sites were mapped to residues with important role in DNA binding. N^ε-lysine formylation in chromosomal proteins is relatively abundant, suggesting that it may interfere with epigenetic mechanisms governing chromatin function, which could lead to deregulation of the cell and disease.     

Mass spectrometric mapping of linker histone H1 variants reveals multiple acetylations, methylations, and phosphorylation as well as differences between cell culture and tissue

Posttranslational modifications of histones are involved in regulation of chromatin structure and gene activity. Whereas the modifications of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 have been extensively studied, our knowledge of H1 modifications remained mainly limited to its phosphorylation. Here we analyzed the composition of histone H1 variants and their modifications in two human cell lines and nine mouse tissues. Use of a hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometer facilitated assignment of modifications by high resolution and low ppm mass accuracy for both the precursor and product mass spectra. Across different tissues we identified a range of phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation sites. We also mapped sites of ubiquitination and report identification of formylated lysine residues. Interestingly many of the mapped modifications are located within the globular domain of the histones at sites that are thought to be involved in binding to nucleosomal DNA. Investigation of mouse tissue in addition to cell lines uncovered a number of interesting differences. For example, whereas methylation sites are frequent in tissues, this type of modification was much less abundant in cultured cells and escaped detection. Our study significantly extends the known spectrum of linker histone variability.