Women's Greater Ability to Perceive Happy Facial Emotion Automatically: Gender Differences in Affective Priming

There is evidence that women are better in recognizing their own and others' emotions. The female advantage in emotion recognition becomes even more apparent under conditions of rapid stimulus presentation. Affective priming paradigms have been developed to examine empirically whether facial emotion stimuli presented outside of conscious awareness color our impressions. It was observed that masked emotional facial expression has an affect congruent influence on subsequent judgments of neutral stimuli. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of gender on affective priming based on negative and positive facial expression. In our priming experiment sad, happy, neutral, or no facial expression was briefly presented (for 33 ms) and masked by neutral faces which had to be evaluated. 81 young healthy volunteers (53 women) participated in the study. Subjects had no subjective awareness of emotional primes. Women did not differ from men with regard to age, education, intelligence, trait anxiety, or depressivity. In the whole sample, happy but not sad facial expression elicited valence congruent affective priming. Between-group analyses revealed that women manifested greater affective priming due to happy faces than men. Women seem to have a greater ability to perceive and respond to positive facial emotion at an automatic processing level compared to men. High perceptual sensitivity to minimal social-affective signals may contribute to women's advantage in understanding other persons' emotional states.     

Involvement of Right STS in Audio-Visual Integration for Affective Speech Demonstrated Using MEG

Speech and emotion perception are dynamic processes in which it may be optimal to integrate synchronous signals emitted from different sources. Studies of audio-visual (AV) perception of neutrally expressed speech demonstrate supra-additive (i.e., where AV>[unimodal auditory+unimodal visual]) responses in left STS to crossmodal speech stimuli. However, emotions are often conveyed simultaneously with speech; through the voice in the form of speech prosody and through the face in the form of facial expression. Previous studies of AV nonverbal emotion integration showed a role for right (rather than left) STS. The current study therefore examined whether the integration of facial and prosodic signals of emotional speech is associated with supra-additive responses in left (cf. results for speech integration) or right (due to emotional content) STS. As emotional displays are sometimes difficult to interpret, we also examined whether supra-additive responses were affected by emotional incongruence (i.e., ambiguity). Using magnetoencephalography, we continuously recorded eighteen participants as they viewed and heard AV congruent emotional and AV incongruent emotional speech stimuli. Significant supra-additive responses were observed in right STS within the first 250 ms for emotionally incongruent and emotionally congruent AV speech stimuli, which further underscores the role of right STS in processing crossmodal emotive signals.     

Selection of Reference Genes for Normalizing Gene Expression During Seed Priming and Germination Using qPCR in Zea mays and Spinacia oleracea

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) has been widely used to investigate gene expression during seed germination, a process involving seed transition from dry/physiologically inactive to hydrated/active state. This transition may result in altered expression of many housekeeping genes (HKGs), conventionally used as internal controls, thereby posing a challenge about selection of HKGs in such scenarios. The objectives of this study included identifying valid reference genes for seed priming and germination studies, both of which involve the transition of seed hydration status, and assessing whether or not findings derived from the “seed model” used in this study would also be applicable to other plant species. Eight commonly used HKGs were evaluated in maize seeds during hydropriming and germination. Using Bestkeeper, geNorm, and NormFinder, we provided a rank of stability for these HKGs. Actdf, UBQ, βtub, 18S, Act, and GAPDH were adjudged as valid internal controls by geNorm and NormFinder. Under the second objective, we conducted a case study with spinach seeds collected during osmopriming and germination. Our results indicate that the conclusions derived from maize were applicable to spinach as well, in that 18S exhibited greater expression stability than GAPDH in osmoprimed and germinated seeds; this held true even under stress conditions. While both of these genes were rejected by BestKeeper, we found that 18S exhibited stable expression when “dry” and “hydrated” seeds were analyzed as separate data sets. Although this approach precludes the comparison between “hydrated” and “dry” seeds, it still provides effective comparison among samples of same hydration status.