共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Sarai A Gromiha MM An J Prabakaran P Selvaraj S Kono H Oobatake M Uedaira H 《Biopolymers》2001,61(2):121-126
Thermodynamic data regarding proteins and their interactions are important for understanding the mechanisms of protein folding, protein stability, and molecular recognition. Although there are several structural databases available for proteins and their complexes with other molecules, databases for experimental thermodynamic data on protein stability and interactions are rather scarce. Thus, we have developed two electronically accessible thermodynamic databases. ProTherm, Thermodynamic Database for Proteins and Mutants, contains numerical data of several thermodynamic parameters of protein stability, experimental methods and conditions, along with structural, functional, and literature information. ProNIT, Thermodynamic Database for Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions, contains thermodynamic data for protein-nucleic acid binding, experimental conditions, structural information of proteins, nucleic acids and the complex, and literature information. These data have been incorporated into 3DinSight, an integrated database for structure, function, and properties of biomolecules. A WWW interface allows users to search for data based on various conditions, with different display and sorting options, and to visualize molecular structures and their interactions. These thermodynamic databases, together with structural databases, help researchers gain insight into the relationship among structure, function, and thermodynamics of proteins and their interactions, and will become useful resources for studying proteins in the postgenomic era. 相似文献
2.
MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions play critical roles in biological processes, and many biologists try to find or to predict crucial information concerning these interactions. Before verifying interactions in biological laboratory work, validating them from previous research is necessary. Although many efforts have been made to create databases that store verified information in a structured form, much interaction information still remains as unstructured text. As the amount of new publications has increased rapidly, a large amount of research has sought to extract interactions from the text automatically. However, there remain various difficulties associated with the process of applying automatically generated results into manually annotated databases. For interactions that are not found in manually stored databases, researchers attempt to search for abstracts or full papers. RESULTS: As a result of a search for two proteins, PubMed frequently returns hundreds of abstracts. In this paper, a method is introduced that validates protein-protein interactions from PubMed abstracts. A query is generated from two given proteins automatically and abstracts are then collected from PubMed. Following this, target proteins and their synonyms are recognized and their interaction information is extracted from the collection. It was found that 67.37% of the interactions from DIP-PPI corpus were found from the PubMed abstracts and 87.37% of interactions were found from the given full texts. AVAILABILITY: Contact authors. 相似文献
3.
蛋白质相互作用数据库及其应用 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
对蛋白质相互作用及其网络的了解不仅有助于深入理解生命活动的本质和疾病发生的机制,而且可以为药物研发提供靶点.目前,通过高通量筛选、计算方法预测和文献挖掘等方法,获得了大批量的蛋白质相互作用数据,并由此构建了很多内容丰富并日益更新的蛋白质相互作用数据库.本文首先简要阐述了大规模蛋白质相互作用数据产生的3种方法,然后重点介绍了几个人类相关的蛋白质相互作用公共数据库,包括HPRD、BIND、 IntAct、MINT、 DIP 和MIPS,并概述了蛋白质相互作用数据库的整合情况以及这些数据库在蛋白质相互作用网络构建上的应用. 相似文献
4.
iPfam: visualization of protein-protein interactions in PDB at domain and amino acid resolutions 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
SUMMARY: There are many resources that contain information about binary interactions between proteins. However, protein interactions are defined by only a subset of residues in any protein. We have implemented a web resource that allows the investigation of protein interactions in the Protein Data Bank structures at the level of Pfam domains and amino acid residues. This detailed knowledge relies on the fact that there are a large number of multidomain proteins and protein complexes being deposited in the structure databases. The resource called iPfam is hosted within the Pfam UK website. Most resources focus on the interactions between proteins; iPfam includes these as well as interactions between domains in a single protein. AVAILABILITY: iPfam is available on the Web for browsing at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/iPfam/; the source-data for iPfam is freely available in relational tables via the ftp site ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/databases/Pfam/database_files/. 相似文献
5.
6.
Background
In recent years, mammalian protein-protein interaction network databases have been developed. The interactions in these databases are either extracted manually from low-throughput experimental biomedical research literature, extracted automatically from literature using techniques such as natural language processing (NLP), generated experimentally using high-throughput methods such as yeast-2-hybrid screens, or interactions are predicted using an assortment of computational approaches. Genes or proteins identified as significantly changing in proteomic experiments, or identified as susceptibility disease genes in genomic studies, can be placed in the context of protein interaction networks in order to assign these genes and proteins to pathways and protein complexes. 相似文献7.
Kristjansdottir K Wolfgeher D Lucius N Angulo DS Kron SJ 《Journal of proteome research》2008,7(7):2812-2824
A significant consequence of protein phosphorylation is to alter protein-protein interactions, leading to dynamic regulation of the components of protein complexes that direct many core biological processes. Recent proteomic studies have populated databases with extensive compilations of cellular phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites and a similarly deep coverage of the subunit compositions and interactions in multiprotein complexes. However, considerably less data are available on the dynamics of phosphorylation, composition of multiprotein complexes or that define their interdependence. We describe a method to identify candidate phosphoprotein complexes by combining phosphoprotein affinity chromatography, separation by size, denaturing gel electrophoresis, protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry, and informatics analysis. Toward developing phosphoproteome profiling, we have isolated native phosphoproteins using a phosphoprotein affinity matrix, Pro-Q Diamond resin (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen). This resin quantitatively retains phosphoproteins and associated proteins from cell extracts. Pro-Q Diamond purification of a yeast whole cell extract followed by 1-D PAGE separation, proteolysis and ESI LC-MS/MS, a method we term PA-GeLC-MS/MS, yielded 108 proteins, a majority of which were known phosphoproteins. To identify proteins that were purified as parts of phosphoprotein complexes, the Pro-Q eluate was separated into two fractions by size, <100 kDa and >100 kDa, before analysis by PAGE and ESI LC-MS/MS and the component proteins queried against databases to identify protein-protein interactions. The <100 kDa fraction was enriched in phosphoproteins indicating the presence of monomeric phosphoproteins. The >100 kDa fraction contained 171 proteins of 20-80 kDa, nearly all of which participate in known protein-protein interactions. Of these 171, few are known phosphoproteins, consistent with their purification by participation in protein complexes. By comparing the results of our phosphoprotein profiling with the informational databases on phosphoproteomics, protein-protein interactions and protein complexes, we have developed an approach to examining the correlation between protein interactions and protein phosphorylation. 相似文献
8.
Background
Cellular processes require the interaction of many proteins across several cellular compartments. Determining the collective network of such interactions is an important aspect of understanding the role and regulation of individual proteins. The Gene Ontology (GO) is used by model organism databases and other bioinformatics resources to provide functional annotation of proteins. The annotation process provides a mechanism to document the binding of one protein with another. We have constructed protein interaction networks for mouse proteins utilizing the information encoded in the GO annotations. The work reported here presents a methodology for integrating and visualizing information on protein-protein interactions. 相似文献9.
Goll J Rajagopala SV Shiau SC Wu H Lamb BT Uetz P 《Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)》2008,24(15):1743-1744
SUMMARY: The microbial protein interaction database (MPIDB) aims to collect and provide all known physical microbial interactions. Currently, 22,530 experimentally determined interactions among proteins of 191 bacterial species/strains can be browsed and downloaded. These microbial interactions have been manually curated from the literature or imported from other databases (IntAct, DIP, BIND, MINT) and are linked to 24,060 experimental evidences (PubMed ID, PSI-MI methods). In contrast to these databases, interactions in MPIDB are further supported by 8150 additional evidences based on interaction conservation, co-purification and 3D domain contacts (iPfam, 3did). AVAILABILITY: http://www.jcvi.org/mpidb/ 相似文献
10.
Farr CD Gafken PR Norbeck AD Doneanu CE Stapels MD Barofsky DF Minami M Saugstad JA 《Journal of neurochemistry》2004,91(2):438-450
We used a proteomic approach to identify novel proteins that may regulate metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) responses by direct or indirect protein interactions. This approach does not rely on the heterologous expression of proteins and offers the advantage of identifying protein interactions in a native environment. The mGluR5 protein was immunoprecipitated from rat brain lysates; co-immunoprecipitating proteins were analyzed by mass spectrometry and identified peptides were matched to protein databases to determine the correlating parent proteins. This proteomic approach revealed the interaction of mGluR5 with known regulatory proteins, as well as novel proteins that reflect previously unidentified molecular constituents of the mGluR5-signaling complex. Immunoblot analysis confirmed the interaction of high confidence proteins, such as phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 1, microtubule-associated protein 2a and dynamin 1, as mGluR5-interacting proteins. These studies show that a proteomic approach can be used to identify candidate interacting proteins. This approach may be particularly useful for neurobiology applications where distinct protein interactions within a signaling complex can dramatically alter the outcome of the response to neurotransmitter release, or the disruption of normal protein interactions can lead to severe neurological and psychiatric disorders. 相似文献
11.
FlyNets and GIF-DB, two internet databases for molecular interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Nucleic acids research》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
E Mohr F Horn F Janody C Sanchez V Pillet B Bellon L Rder B Jacq 《Nucleic acids research》1998,26(1):89-93
GIF-DB and FlyNets are two WWW databases describing molecular (protein-DNA, protein-RNA and protein-protein) interactions occuring in the fly Drosophila melanogaster (http://gifts.univ-mrs.fr/GIFTS_home_page.html ). GIF-DB is a specialised database which focuses on molecular interactions involved in the process of embryonic pattern formation, whereas FlyNets is a new and more general database, the long-term goal of which is to report on any published molecular interaction occuring in the fly. The information content of both databases is distributed in specific lines arranged into an EMBL- (or GenBank-) like format. These databases achieve a high level of integration with other databases such as FlyBase, EMBL, GenBank and SWISS-PROT through numerous hyperlinks. In addition, we also describe SOS-DGDB, a new collection of annotated Drosophila gene sequences, in which binding sites for regulatory proteins are directly visible on the DNA primary sequence and hyperlinked both to GIF-DB and TRANSFAC database entries. 相似文献
12.
The interactions between proteins allow the cell's life. A number of experimental, genome-wide, high-throughput studies have been devoted to the determination of protein-protein interactions and the consequent interaction networks. Here, the bioinformatics methods dealing with protein-protein interactions and interaction network are overviewed. 1. Interaction databases developed to collect and annotate this immense amount of data; 2. Automated data mining techniques developed to extract information about interactions from the published literature; 3. Computational methods to assess the experimental results developed as a consequence of the finding that the results of high-throughput methods are rather inaccurate; 4. Exploitation of the information provided by protein interaction networks in order to predict functional features of the proteins; and 5. Prediction of protein-protein interactions. 相似文献
13.
Co-conservation (phylogenetic profiles) is a well-established method for predicting functional relationships between proteins. Several publicly available databases use this method and additional clustering strategies to develop networks of protein interactions (cluster co-conservation (CCC)). CCC has previously been limited to interactions within a single target species. We have extended CCC to develop protein interaction networks based on co-conservation between protein pairs across multiple species, cross-species cluster co-conservation. 相似文献
14.
Molecular understanding of disease processes can be accelerated if all interactions between the host and pathogen are known. The unavailability of experimental methods for large-scale detection of interactions across host and pathogen organisms hinders this process. Here we apply a simple method to predict protein-protein interactions across a host and pathogen organisms. We use homology detection approaches against the protein-protein interaction databases, DIP and iPfam in order to predict interacting proteins in a host-pathogen pair. In the present work, we first applied this approach to the test cases involving the pairs phage T4 -Escherichia coli and phage lambda -E. coli and show that previously known interactions could be recognized using our approach. We further apply this approach to predict interactions between human and three pathogens E. coli, Salmonella enterica typhimurium and Yersinia pestis. We identified several novel interactions involving proteins of host or pathogen that could be thought of as highly relevant to the disease process. Serendipitously, many interactions involve hypothetical proteins of yet unknown function. Hypothetical proteins are predicted from computational analysis of genome sequences with no laboratory analysis on their functions yet available. The predicted interactions involving such proteins could provide hints to their functions. 相似文献
15.
We describe domain pair exclusion analysis (DPEA), a method for inferring domain interactions from databases of interacting proteins. DPEA features a log odds score, Eij, reflecting confidence that domains i and j interact. We analyzed 177,233 potential domain interactions underlying 26,032 protein interactions. In total, 3,005 high-confidence domain interactions were inferred, and were evaluated using known domain interactions in the Protein Data Bank. DPEA may prove useful in guiding experiment-based discovery of previously unrecognized domain interactions. 相似文献
16.
17.
蛋白质相互作用既是蛋白质执行功能的主要方式,也是细胞功能调控网络的结构基础。蛋白质间异常的相互作用及其连锁网络的紊乱是引起许多病理改变的原因。作为功能基因组和蛋白质组研究的重要内容,规模化蛋白质相互作用研究已成为近年国际上研究的热点之一。文章综述了当前规模化蛋白质相互作用研究中的常用技术和常用蛋白质相互作用数据库,研究者可根据研究需要和技术特点利用这些资源。 相似文献
18.
A large number of methods have been developed over the years to study protein-protein interactions. Many of these techniques are now available to the nonspecialist researcher thanks to new affordable instruments and/or resource centres. A typical protein-protein interaction study usually starts with an initial screen for novel binding partners. We start this review by describing three techniques that can be used for this purpose: (i) affinity-tagged proteins (ii) the two-hybrid system and (iii) some quantitative proteomic techniques that can be used in combination with, e.g., affinity chromatography and coimmunoprecipitation for screening of protein-protein interactions. We then describe some public protein-protein interaction databases that can be searched to identify previously reported interactions for a given bait protein. Four strategies for validation of protein-protein interactions are presented: confocal microscopy for intracellular colocalization of proteins, coimmunoprecipitation, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and spectroscopic studies. Throughout the review we focus particularly on the advantages and limitations of each method. 相似文献
19.
Fiona Browne Haiying Wang Huiru Zheng Francisco Azuaje 《Source code for biology and medicine》2009,4(1):1-7
Background
Information about protein interaction networks is fundamental to understanding protein function and cellular processes. Interaction patterns among proteins can suggest new drug targets and aid in the design of new therapeutic interventions. Efforts have been made to map interactions on a proteomic-wide scale using both experimental and computational techniques. Reference datasets that contain known interacting proteins (positive cases) and non-interacting proteins (negative cases) are essential to support computational prediction and validation of protein-protein interactions. Information on known interacting and non interacting proteins are usually stored within databases. Extraction of these data can be both complex and time consuming. Although, the automatic construction of reference datasets for classification is a useful resource for researchers no public resource currently exists to perform this task. 相似文献20.
Many methods developed for estimating the reliability of protein–protein interactions are based on the topology of protein–protein interaction networks. This paper describes a new reliability measure for protein–protein interactions, which does not rely on the topology of protein interaction networks, but expresses biological information on functional roles, sub-cellular localisations and protein classes as a scoring schema. The new measure is useful for filtering many spurious interactions, as well as for estimating the reliability of protein interaction data. In particular, the reliability measure can be used to search protein–protein interactions with the desired reliability in databases. The reliability-based search engine is available at http://yeast.hpid.org. We believe this is the first search engine for interacting proteins, which is made available to public. The search engine and the reliability measure of protein interactions should provide useful information for determining proteins to focus on. 相似文献