Mechanisms of synaptic vesicle recycling illuminated by fluorescent dyes

The recycling of synaptic vesicles in nerve terminals involves multiple steps, underlies all aspects of synaptic transmission, and is a key to understanding the basis of synaptic plasticity. The development of styryl dyes as fluorescent molecules that label recycling synaptic vesicles has revolutionized the way in which synaptic vesicle recycling can be investigated, by allowing an examination of processes in neurons that have long been inaccessible. In this review, we evaluate the major aspects of synaptic vesicle recycling that have been revealed and advanced by studies with styryl dyes, focussing upon synaptic vesicle fusion, retrieval, and trafficking. The greatest impact of styryl dyes has been to allow the routine visualization of endocytosis in central nerve terminals for the first time. This has revealed the kinetics of endocytosis, its underlying sequential steps, and its regulation by Ca2+. In studies of exocytosis, styryl dyes have helped distinguish between different modes of vesicle fusion, provided direct support for the quantal nature of exocytosis and endocytosis, and revealed how the probability of exocytosis varies enormously from one nerve terminal to another. Synaptic vesicle labelling with styryl dyes has helped our understanding of vesicle trafficking by allowing better understanding of different synaptic vesicle pools within the nerve terminal, vesicle intermixing, and vesicle clustering at release sites. Finally, the dyes are now being used in innovative ways to reveal further insights into synaptic plasticity.     

Synaptic vesicles: is kissing a matter of competence?

The "kiss-and-run" model of exocytosis and endocytosis predicts that synaptic vesicles can undergo fast and efficient recycling, after fusion with the plasmalemma, without intermixing of membranes. Evidence is mounting from several new experimental approaches that kiss-and-run occurs at synapses. Distinct vesicle pools, which initially were identified in morphological terms, are now being characterized in biochemical and functional terms. In addition, at least two functional recycling pathways, operating on different time scales (from milliseconds to tens of seconds), have been shown to coexist in the same synaptic system, and the two pathways appear to be differentially regulated. Taken together, these data suggest that kiss-and-run operates in parallel with the classical, coated-vesicle recycling. Here, we review recent evidence for kiss-and-run recycling and discuss whether it is a distinct process, dependent on the molecular organization of the fusing vesicle. We propose that vesicles undergo a process of "competence maturation". According to this view, the specific molecular make-up of the vesicles, their location and their interactions with nerve terminal proteins might determine not only the differential availability of the vesicles for fusion and neurotransmitter release but also the recycling path that they will follow.     

Do different endocytic pathways make different synaptic vesicles?

At a wide range of synapses, synaptic vesicles reside in distinct pools that respond to different stimuli. The recycling pool supplies the vesicles required for release in response to modest stimulation, whereas the reserve pool is mobilized only by strong stimulation. Multiple pathways have been proposed for the recycling of synaptic vesicles after exocytosis, but the relationship of these pathways to the different synaptic vesicle pools has remained unclear. Synaptic vesicle proteins have also been assumed to undergo recycling as a unit. However, emerging data indicate that differences in the association with distinct endocytic adaptors such as the heterotetrameric adaptor AP3 influence the trafficking of individual synaptic vesicle proteins, affecting the composition of synaptic vesicles and hence their functional characteristics. These observations might begin to account for differences in the properties of different vesicle pools.     

An isolated pool of vesicles recycles at rest and drives spontaneous neurotransmission

Spontaneous synaptic vesicle fusion is a common property of all synapses. To trace the origin of spontaneously fused vesicles in hippocampal synapses, we tagged vesicles with fluorescent styryl dyes, antibodies against synaptotagmin-1, or horseradish peroxidase. We could show that synaptic vesicles recycle at rest, and after spontaneous exo-endocytosis, they populate a reluctantly releasable pool of limited size. Interestingly, vesicles in this spontaneously labeled pool were more likely to re-fuse spontaneously compared to vesicles labeled with activity. We found that blocking vesicle refilling at rest selectively depleted neurotransmitter from spontaneously fusing vesicles without significantly altering evoked transmission. Furthermore, in the absence of the vesicle SNARE protein synaptobrevin (VAMP), activity-dependent and spontaneously recycling vesicles could mix, suggesting a role for synaptobrevin in the separation of the two pools. Taken together these results suggest that spontaneously recycling vesicles and activity-dependent recycling vesicles originate from distinct pools with limited cross-talk with each other.     

Vesicle cycle in the presynaptic nerve terminal

Presynaptic nerve terminals contain a great number ofsynaptic vesicles filled with neurotransmitter. The transmission of information in synapses is mediated by release of transmitter from vesicles: exocytosis, after their fusion with presynaptic membrane. At the functioning synapses, the continuous recycling of synaptic vesicles occurs (vesicle cycle), which provides multiple reuse of vesicular membrane material during synaptic activity. Vesicle cycle consists of large number of steps, including vesicle fusion--exocytosis, formation of new vesicles--endocytosis, vesicle sorting, filling of vesicles with transmitter, intraterminal vesicle transport driving the vesicles to different vesicle pools and preparing to next exocytic event. At this paper, I presented the latest literature and our data regarding the steps and mechanisms of vesicle cycle at synapses. Special attention was paid to neuromuscular synapse as the most thoroughly investigated and as my favorite preparation.     

SNARE protein recycling by αSNAP and βSNAP supports synaptic vesicle priming

Neurotransmitter release proceeds by Ca(2+)-triggered, SNARE-complex-dependent synaptic vesicle fusion. After fusion, the ATPase NSF and its cofactors α- and βSNAP disassemble SNARE complexes, thereby recycling individual SNAREs for subsequent fusion reactions. We examined the effects of genetic perturbation of α- and βSNAP expression on synaptic vesicle exocytosis, employing a new Ca(2+) uncaging protocol to study synaptic vesicle trafficking, priming, and fusion in small glutamatergic synapses of hippocampal neurons. By characterizing this protocol, we show that synchronous and asynchronous transmitter release involve different Ca(2+) sensors and are not caused by distinct releasable vesicle pools, and that tonic transmitter release is due to ongoing priming and fusion of new synaptic vesicles during high synaptic activity. Our analysis of α- and βSNAP deletion mutant neurons shows that the two NSF cofactors support synaptic vesicle priming by determining the availability of free SNARE components, particularly during phases of high synaptic activity.     

Synaptotagmin-7 controls the size of the reserve and resting pools of synaptic vesicles in hippocampal neurons

Continuous neurotransmitter release is subjected to synaptic vesicle availability, which in turn depends on vesicle recycling and the traffic of vesicles between pools. We studied the role of Synaptotagmin-7 (Syt-7) in synaptic vesicle accessibility for release in hippocampal neurons in culture. Synaptic boutons from Syt-7 knockout (KO) mice displayed normal basal secretion with no alteration in the RRP size or the probability of release. However, stronger stimuli revealed an increase in the size of the reserve and resting vesicle pools in Syt-7 KO boutons compared with WT. These data suggest that Syt-7 plays a significant role in the vesicle pool homeostasis and, consequently, in the availability of vesicles for synaptic transmission during strong stimulation, probably, by facilitating advancing synaptic vesicles to the readily releasable pool.     

Evidence for a primary endocytic vesicle involved in synaptic vesicle biogenesis

The regulated release of neurotransmitters at synapses is mediated by the fusion of neurotransmitter-filled synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane. Continuous synaptic activity relies on the constant recycling of synaptic vesicle proteins into newly formed synaptic vesicles. At least two different mechanisms are presumed to mediate synaptic vesicle biogenesis at the synapse as follows: direct retrieval of synaptic vesicle proteins and lipids from the plasma membrane, and indirect passage of synaptic vesicle proteins through an endosomal intermediate. We have identified a vesicle population with the characteristics of a primary endocytic vesicle responsible for the recycling of synaptic vesicle proteins through the indirect pathway. We find that synaptic vesicle proteins colocalize in this vesicle with a variety of proteins known to recycle from the plasma membrane through the endocytic pathway, including three different glucose transporters, GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4, and the transferrin receptor. These vesicles differ from "classical" synaptic vesicles in their size and their generic protein content, indicating that they do not discriminate between synaptic vesicle-specific proteins and other recycling proteins. We propose that these vesicles deliver synaptic vesicle proteins that have escaped internalization by the direct pathway to endosomes, where they are sorted from other recycling proteins and packaged into synaptic vesicles.     

Synaptic vesicle pools and dynamics

Synaptic vesicles release neurotransmitter at chemical synapses, thus initiating the flow of information in neural networks. To achieve this, vesicles undergo a dynamic cycle of fusion and retrieval to maintain the structural and functional integrity of the presynaptic terminals in which they reside. Moreover, compelling evidence indicates these vesicles differ in their availability for release and mobilization in response to stimuli, prompting classification into at least three different functional pools. Ongoing studies of the molecular and cellular bases for this heterogeneity attempt to link structure to physiology and clarify how regulation of vesicle pools influences synaptic strength and presynaptic plasticity. We discuss prevailing perspectives on vesicle pools, the role they play in shaping synaptic transmission, and the open questions that challenge current understanding.     

Protein-protein interactions and protein modules in the control of neurotransmitter release

Information transfer among neurons is operated by neurotransmitters stored in synaptic vesicles and released to the extracellular space by an efficient process of regulated exocytosis. Synaptic vesicles are organized into two distinct functional pools, a large reserve pool in which vesicles are restrained by the actin-based cytoskeleton, and a quantitatively smaller releasable pool in which vesicles approach the presynaptic membrane and eventually fuse with it on stimulation. Both synaptic vesicle trafficking and neurotransmitter release depend on a precise sequence of events that include release from the reserve pool, targeting to the active zone, docking, priming, fusion and endocytotic retrieval of synaptic vesicles. These steps are mediated by a series of specific interactions among cytoskeletal, synaptic vesicle, presynaptic membrane and cytosolic proteins that, by acting in concert, promote the spatial and temporal regulation of the exocytotic machinery. The majority of these interactions are mediated by specific protein modules and domains that are found in many proteins and are involved in numerous intracellular processes. In this paper, the possible physiological role of these multiple protein-protein interactions is analysed, with ensuing updating and clarification of the present molecular model of the process of neurotransmitter release.     

Molecular Underpinnings of Synaptic Vesicle Pool Heterogeneity

Neuronal communication relies on chemical synaptic transmission for information transfer and processing. Chemical neurotransmission is initiated by synaptic vesicle fusion with the presynaptic active zone resulting in release of neurotransmitters. Classical models have assumed that all synaptic vesicles within a synapse have the same potential to fuse under different functional contexts. In this model, functional differences among synaptic vesicle populations are ascribed to their spatial distribution in the synapse with respect to the active zone. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that synaptic vesicles are not a homogenous population of organelles, and they possess intrinsic molecular differences and differential interaction partners. Recent studies have reported a diverse array of synaptic molecules that selectively regulate synaptic vesicles' ability to fuse synchronously and asynchronously in response to action potentials or spontaneously irrespective of action potentials. Here we discuss these molecular mediators of vesicle pool heterogeneity that are found on the synaptic vesicle membrane, on the presynaptic plasma membrane, or within the cytosol and consider some of the functional consequences of this diversity. This emerging molecular framework presents novel avenues to probe synaptic function and uncover how synaptic vesicle pools impact neuronal signaling.      

v-SNARE composition distinguishes synaptic vesicle pools

Synaptic vesicles belong to two distinct pools, a recycling pool responsible for the evoked release of neurotransmitter and a resting pool unresponsive to stimulation. The uniform appearance of synaptic vesicles has suggested that differences in location or cytoskeletal association account for these differences in function. We now find that the v-SNARE tetanus toxin-insensitive vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP7) differs from other synaptic vesicle proteins in its distribution to the two pools, providing evidence that they differ in molecular composition. We also find that both resting and recycling pools undergo spontaneous release, and when activated by deletion of the longin domain, VAMP7 influences the properties of release. Further, the endocytosis that follows evoked and spontaneous release differs in mechanism, and specific sequences confer targeting to the different vesicle pools. The results suggest that different endocytic mechanisms generate synaptic vesicles with different proteins that can endow the vesicles with distinct properties.     

Size of vesicle pools, rates of mobilization, and recycling at neuromuscular synapses of a Drosophila mutant, shibire

Two vesicle pools, readily releasable (RRP) and reserve (RP) pools, are present at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Using a temperature-sensitive mutant, shibire(ts), we studied pool sizes and vesicle mobilization rates. In shibire(ts), due to lack of endocytosis at nonpermissive temperatures, synaptic currents continuously declined during tetanic stimulation until they ceased as the result of vesicle depletion. By then, approximately 84,000 quanta were released. Vesicles were mobilized from RP at a rate 1/7-1/10 of RRP. Cytochalasin D inhibited mobilization of vesicles from RP, allowing us to estimate the size of RRP as 14%-19% of all vesicles. Vesicle recycling supports synaptic transmission during prolonged tetanic stimulation and the maximum recycling rate was 1000 vesicles/s.     

Synaptophysin binds to physophilin, a putative synaptic plasma membrane protein

We have developed procedures for detecting synaptic vesicle-binding proteins by using glutaraldehyde-fixed or native vesicle fractions as absorbent matrices. Both adsorbents identify a prominent synaptic vesicle-binding protein of 36 kD in rat brain synaptosomes and mouse brain primary cultures. The binding of this protein to synaptic vesicles is competed by synaptophysin, a major integral membrane protein of synaptic vesicles, with half-maximal inhibition seen between 10(-8) and 10(-7) M synaptophysin. Because of its affinity for synaptophysin, we named the 36-kD synaptic vesicle-binding protein physophilin (psi nu sigma alpha, greek = bubble, vesicle; psi iota lambda os, greek = friend). Physophilin exhibits an isoelectric point of approximately 7.8, a Stokes radius of 6.6 nm, and an apparent sedimentation coefficient of 5.6 S, pointing to an oligomeric structure of this protein. It is present in synaptic plasma membranes prepared from synaptosomes but not in synaptic vesicles. In solubilization experiments, physophilin behaves as an integral membrane protein. Thus, a putative synaptic plasma membrane protein exhibits a specific interaction with one of the major membrane proteins of synaptic vesicles. This interaction may play a role in docking and/or fusion of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic plasma membrane.     

Monitoring synaptic vesicle recycling in frog motor nerve terminals with FM dyes

Ultrastructural observations made in the study of the frog neuromuscular junction (NMJ) almost three decades ago showed that synaptic vesicle cycling functions through a slow pathway, requiring the use of clathrin-coated vesicles and an endosomal compartment. Simultaneously, a conceptually simpler model emerged, postulating rapid retrieval of vesicle membrane through a mechanism similar to a reversal of vesicle fusion. With the advent of fluorescence imaging which allows the investigator to monitor recycling in living nerve-muscle preparations, new data appeared which reconcile at least in part the two models, indicating that both may be important at this synapse. Two different synaptic vesicle pools can be defined, a readily releasable pool (RRP), consisting of quanta that are immediately available for release, and a reserve pool (RP) that is exocytosed only after prolonged stimulation. Vesicles in the RRP recycle through a fast endocytic pathway, which does not rely on an endosomal compartment, while vesicles in the RP cycle more slowly through formation of infoldings and endosomes and their subsequent severance into vesicles. The two pools mix slowly, and their recycling may be regulated by different mechanisms.     

Munc13-1 acts as a priming factor for large dense-core vesicles in bovine chromaffin cells

In chromaffin cells the number of large dense-core vesicles (LDCVs) which can be released by brief, intense stimuli represents only a small fraction of the 'morphologically docked' vesicles at the plasma membrane. Recently, it was shown that Munc13-1 is essential for a post-docking step of synaptic vesicle fusion. To investigate the role of Munc13-1 in LDCV exocytosis, we overexpressed Munc13-1 in chromaffin cells and stimulated secretion by flash photolysis of caged calcium. Both components of the exocytotic burst, which represent the fusion of release-competent vesicles, were increased by a factor of three. The sustained component, which represents vesicle maturation and subsequent fusion, was increased by the same factor. The response to a second flash, however, was greatly reduced, indicating a depletion of release-competent vesicles. Since there was no apparent change in the number of docked vesicles, we conclude that Munc13-1 acts as a priming factor by accelerating the rate constant of vesicle transfer from a pool of docked, but unprimed vesicles to a pool of release-competent, primed vesicles.     

Measurements of the acidification kinetics of single SynaptopHluorin vesicles

Uptake of neurotransmitters into synaptic vesicles is driven by the proton gradient established across the vesicle membrane. The acidification of synaptic vesicles, therefore, is a crucial component of vesicle function. Here we present measurements of acidification rate constants from isolated, single synaptic vesicles. Vesicles were purified from mice expressing a fusion protein termed SynaptopHluorin created by the fusion of VAMP/synaptobrevin to the pH-sensitive super-ecliptic green fluorescent protein. We calibrated SynaptopHluorin fluorescence to determine the relationship between fluorescence intensity and internal vesicle pH, and used these values to measure the rate constant of vesicle acidification. We also measured the effects of ATP, glutamate, and chloride on acidification. We report acidification time constants of 500 ms to 1 s. The rate of acidification increased with increasing extravesicular concentrations of ATP and glutamate. These data provide an upper and a lower bound for vesicle acidification and indicate that vesicle readiness can be regulated by changes in energy and transmitter availability.     

Peculiarities of synaptic vesicle recycling in frog and mouse motor nerve terminals

Using electrophysiology and fluorescence microscopy with dye FM 1-43, a comparative study of peculiarities of neurotransmitter secretion, synaptic vesicle exo-endocytosis and recycling has been carried out in nerve terminals (NT) of the skin-sternal muscle of the frog Rana ridibunda and of the white mouse diaphragm muscle during a long-term high-frequency stimulation (20 imp/s). The obtained data have allowed identifying three synaptic vesicle pools and two recycling ways in the motor NT. In the frog NT, the long-term high-frequency stimulation induced consecutive expenditure of the pool ready to release, the mobilizational, and reserve vesicle pools. The exocytosis rate exceeded markedly the endocytosis rate; the slow synaptic vesicle recycling with replenishment of the reserve pool was predominant. In the mouse NT, only the vesicles of the ready to release and the mobilizational pools, which are replenished predominantly by fast recycling, were exocytosed. The exo- and endocytosis occurred practically in parallel, while vesicles of the reserve pool did not participate in the neurotransmitter secretion. It is suggested that evolution of the motor NT from the poikilothermal to homoiothermal animals went by the way of a decrease of the vesicle pool size, the more economic expenditure and the more effective reuse of synaptic vesicles owing to the high rates of endocytosis and recycling. These peculiarities can provide in NT of homoiothermal animals a long maintenance of neurotransmitter secretion at the steady and sufficiently high level to preserve reliability of synaptic transmission in the process of the high-frequency activity.     

Endocytosis at ribbon synapses

Unlike conventional synaptic terminals that release neurotransmitter episodically in response to action potentials, neurons of the visual, auditory and vestibular systems encode sensory information in graded signals that are transmitted at their synapses by modulating the rate of continuous release. The synaptic ribbon, a specialized structure found at the active zones of these neurons, is necessary to sustain the high rates of exocytosis required for continuous release. To maintain the fidelity of synaptic transmission, exocytosis must be balanced by high-capacity endocytosis, to retrieve excess membrane inserted during vesicle fusion. Capacitance measurements following vesicle release in ribbon-type neurons indicate two kinetically distinct phases of compensatory endocytosis, whose relative contributions vary with stimulus intensity. The two phases can be independently regulated and may reflect different underlying mechanisms operating on separate pools of recycling vesicles. Electron microscopy shows diversity among ribbon-type synapses in the relative importance of clathrin-mediated endocytosis versus bulk membrane retrieval as mechanisms of compensatory endocytosis. Ribbon synapses, like conventional synapses, make use of multiple endocytosis pathways to replenish synaptic vesicle pools, depending on the physiological needs of the particular cell type.     

Kiss-and-run, collapse and 'readily retrievable' vesicles

Two models of synaptic vesicle recycling have been intensely debated for decades: kiss‐and‐run, in which the vesicle opens and closes transiently, presumably through a small fusion pore, and full fusion, in which the vesicle collapses into the plasma membrane and is retrieved by clathrin‐coat‐dependent processes. Conceptually, it seems that kiss‐and‐run would be faster and would retrieve vesicles with greater fidelity. Is this the case? This review discusses recent evidence for both models. We conclude that both mechanisms allow for high fidelity of vesicle recycling. Also, the presence in the plasma membrane of a depot of previously fused vesicles that are already interacting with the endocytotic machinery (the ‘readily retrievable’ vesicles) allows full fusion to trigger quite fast endocytosis, further blurring the efficiency differences between the two models.