Evidence for Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana

Chloroplasts are the sites of photosynthesis in plants, and they contain their own multicopy, requisite genome. Chloroplasts are also major sites for production of reactive oxygen species, which can damage essential components of the chloroplast, including the chloroplast genome. Compared with mitochondria in animals, relatively little is known about the potential to repair oxidative DNA damage in chloroplasts. Here we provide evidence of DNA glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity involved in base excision repair of oxidized pyrimidines in chloroplast protein extracts of Arabidopsis thaliana. Three base excision repair components (two endonuclease III homologs and an apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease) that might account for this activity were identified by bioinformatics. Transient expression of protein-green fluorescent protein fusions showed that all three are targeted to the chloroplast and co-localized with chloroplast DNA in nucleoids. The glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity of one of the endonuclease III homologs, AtNTH2, which had not previously been characterized, was confirmed in vitro. T-DNA insertions in each of these genes were identified, and the physiological and biochemical phenotypes of the single, double, and triple mutants were analyzed. This mutant analysis revealed the presence of a third glycosylase activity and potentially another pathway for repair of oxidative DNA damage in chloroplasts.Reactive oxygen species (ROS)² are inevitable by-products of metabolism in all aerobic organisms (1). Plants and algae are especially prone to photo-oxidative stress because of ROS generated during oxygenic photosynthesis. Several types of ROS are generated at various sites in the photosynthetic electron transport chain in chloroplasts, and their production is enhanced by such factors as excess or varying light intensities and extremes of temperature, drought, nutrient deficiencies, and herbicides (2). These ROS can damage many chloroplast constituents, including lipids, proteins, pigments, and the multicopy genome.Plants have evolved numerous mechanisms to deal with photo-oxidative stress, including dissipation of excess light energy, synthesis of antioxidant molecules and scavenging enzymes, and targeted repair (2). DNA repair of oxidized bases, such as thymine glycol (TG) or 8-oxoguanine, can be hypothesized as an important element of chloroplast photoprotection. Although there is considerable overlap in both the types of DNA lesions caused by different insults and the targeting of different DNA repair mechanisms, base excision repair (BER) is considered to be the main repair pathway for oxidative DNA damage, at least in the nucleus and mitochondrion (3, 4).BER repairs single damaged bases (because of oxidation, deamination, alkylation, etc.) in DNA by removing them, breaking the phosphodiester backbone, excising the sugar residue at the abasic site, and filling the gap (reviewed in Refs. 5, 6). BER begins with a DNA glycosylase or glycosylase-lyase. There are many types of glycosylases in any given organism and across taxa, and they are distinguishable by their substrate specificity, whether they are monofunctional (glycosylase activity only) or bifunctional (glycosylase plus apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase activities; see below), by the phylogenetic family in which they reside, and/or by conserved structural characteristics (reviewed in Refs. 6–8). The glycosylases involved in BER of oxidative DNA damage can be roughly divided into those that target either oxidized purines or oxidized pyrimidines (4, 9). For example, TG is a common type of oxidized pyrimidine, which is removed primarily by endonuclease III (Nth), endonuclease VIII (Nei), or their homologs (10). TG is only poorly mutagenic, but it strongly blocks polymerases, inducing cell cycle arrest and potentially cell death if it is not removed.After an appropriate glycosylase cleaves the N-glycosyl bond attaching a damaged base to deoxyribose, leaving an abasic site, the sugar-phosphate backbone is nicked. Bifunctional glycosylases also have an AP lyase activity that cleaves on the 3′ side of the AP site. However, the site still requires the function of a separate AP endonuclease that cuts on the 5′ side of the AP site to remove the 3′-deoxyribose residue at the nick site (11) before repair can continue. In the case of a monofunctional glycosylase, an AP endonuclease nicks the strand on the 5′ side of the AP site. Escherichia coli has two unrelated AP endonucleases, exonuclease III (Xth) and endonuclease IV (Nfo). In humans Ape1/Ref-1 is an Xth homolog, and in yeast Apn1p is an Nfo homolog (5, 12). Following generation of the AP site and nicking of the backbone, the gap is filled by a polymerase in either a short or long patch and then sealed by a ligase.BER of oxidative DNA lesions such TG has been studied intensively in E. coli, yeast, and mammals, whereas comparatively little is known about BER in plants. For example, only two genes involved in BER of oxidized pyrimidines have been characterized previously in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (13, 14), and their localization within the plant cell is unknown. An Nth homolog in Arabidopsis, AtNTH1 (At2g31450), has the expected bifunctional glycosylase-lyase activity in vitro (14). The ARP gene (At2g41460) in Arabidopsis encodes an enzyme with AP endonuclease activity (13).Here we present the results of experiments conducted to address whether there is BER of oxidized pyrimidines in the Arabidopsis chloroplast. Chloroplast protein extracts were assayed for glycosylase-lyase/endonuclease activity. The chloroplast localization of ARP, AtNTH1, and AtNTH2, a second Arabidopsis homolog of Nth, was tested experimentally, and the predicted activity of AtNTH2 was confirmed in vitro. In addition, an analysis of T-DNA insertion mutants affecting each of these three BER genes was performed.     

Identification of a Deubiquitinating Enzyme as a Novel AGS3-Interacting Protein

Activator of G protein Signaling 3 (AGS3) is a receptor-independent G protein activator that has been implicated in multiple biological events such as brain development, neuroplasticity and addiction, cardiac function, Golgi structure/function, macroautophagy and metabolism. However, how AGS3 is regulated is little known. We demonstrate here that AGS3 interacts with a ubiquitin specific protease USP9x, and this interaction is at least partially mediated through the C-terminal G protein regulatory domain of AGS3. Knockdown of USP9x causes a moderate reduction in the level of AGS3. In contrast, overexpression of either USP9x or its deubiquitinating domain UCH increases the amount of AGS3, whereas expression of the mutant UCH domain that lacks deubiquitinating activity does not have the same effect. As previously observed in AGS3 knockdown cells, the localization of several marker proteins of the late Golgi compartments is disturbed in cells depleted of USP9x. Taken together, our study suggests that USP9x can modulate the level of a subpopulation of AGS3, and this modulation plays a role in regulating the structure of the late Golgi compartments. Finally, we have found that levels of AGS3 and USP9x are co-regulated in the prefrontal cortex of rats withdrawn from repeated cocaine treatment. In conjunction with the above data, this observation indicates a potential role of USP9X in the regulation of the AGS3 level during cocaine-induced neuroplasticity.     

Effective Inhibitors of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Based on Monoterpenoids as Potential Agents for Antitumor Therapy

Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry - Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (Tdp1) is one of the important DNA repair enzymes responsible for the repair of DNA damage caused by anticancer drugs, such...     

DNA损伤监测及修复相关酶与细胞衰老

衰老是细胞的重要生命现象之一,衰老假说之一认为细胞中残留DNA损伤的积累可加速细胞的衰老.因此,细胞内DNA损伤监测及修复系统的正常运行与细胞衰老调控密切相关,DNA损伤监测及修复相关酶如PARP、DNA-PK、ATM、p53等在细胞衰老中的调控作用日益受到广泛关注.研究这些蛋白质分子间的相互作用及其在细胞衰老过程中的调控功能,有利于揭示DNA损伤应激、损伤修复调控与细胞衰老之间的内在联系,为抗衰老研究及从衰老角度治疗肿瘤提供新的思路.     

Repair of DNA Damage Induced by the Cytidine Analog Zebularine Requires ATR and ATM in Arabidopsis

DNA damage repair is an essential cellular mechanism that maintains genome stability. Here, we show that the nonmethylable cytidine analog zebularine induces a DNA damage response in Arabidopsis thaliana, independent of changes in DNA methylation. In contrast to genotoxic agents that induce damage in a cell cycle stage-independent manner, zebularine induces damage specifically during strand synthesis in DNA replication. The signaling of this damage is mediated by additive activity of ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED AND RAD3-RELATED and ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED kinases, which cause postreplicative cell cycle arrest and increased endoreplication. The repair requires a functional STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES5 (SMC5)-SMC6 complex and is accomplished predominantly by synthesis-dependent strand-annealing homologous recombination. Here, we provide insight into the response mechanism for coping with the genotoxic effects of zebularine and identify several components of the zebularine-induced DNA damage repair pathway.     

线粒体DNA修复系统相关酶的研究进展

线粒体DNA（mtDNA）编码线粒体电子传递系统的亚单位以及构建翻译机器所需的各种rRAN和tRNA。mtDNA编码的每一个亚单位都是线粒体完成正常的氧化磷酸化过程所必需的,因此,线粒体DNA的完整性对于生物体的生存十分重要。长期以来,人们一直认为线粒体中不存在DNA的修复。近年来在线粒体提取物中却检测到了一定数量的修复因子,提示线粒体中存在DNA的修复。主要对线粒体修复系统中相关酶的研究进展进行综述。Abstract: Mitochondrial DNA（mtDNA） encodes subunits of the mitochondrial electron transport system and the rRNAs and tRNAs required for constructing the mitochondrial tranlational machinery.Each subunit encoded by mtDNA is essential for normal oxidative phosphorylation.Thus,integrity of the mtDNA is crucial for the survival of organisms.It has long been held that there is no DNA repair in mitochondria.But in recent years,a number of repair factors have been found in mitochondrial extracts,suggesting the presence of DNA repair in mitochondria.This review summarized recent progress of enzyme in mitochondrial DNA repair processes.     

DNA Damage and Repair in Eukaryotic Cells

DAMAGE IN DNA AFTER IRRADIATION CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO FIVE KINDS: base damage, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, DNA-DNA cross-linking, and DNA-protein cross-linking. Of these, repair of base damage is the best understood. In eukaryotes, at least three repair systems are known that can deal with base damage: photoreactivation, excision repair, and post-replication repair. Photoreactivation is specific for UV-induced damage and occurs widely throughout the biosphere, although it seems to be absent from placental mammals. Excision repair is present in prokaryotes and in animals but does not seem to be present in plants. Post-replication repair is poorly understood. Recent reports indicate that growing points in mammalian DNA simply skip past UV-induced lesions, leaving gaps in newly made DNA that are subsequently filled in by de novo synthesis. Evidence that this concept is oversimplified or incorrect is presented.-Single-strand breaks are induced by ionizing radiation but most cells can rapidly repair most or all of them, even after supralethal doses. The chemistry of the fragments formed when breaks are induced by ionizing radiation is complex and poorly understood. Therefore, the intermediate steps in the repair of single-strand breaks are unknown. Double-strand breaks and the two kinds of cross-linking have been studied very little and almost nothing is known about their mechanisms for repair.-The role of mammalian DNA repair in mutations is not known. Although there is evidence that defective repair can lead to cancer and/or premature aging in humans, the relationship between the molecular defects and the diseased state remains obscure.     

Identification of SMARCAL1 as a Component of the DNA Damage Response

SMARCAL1 (also known as HARP) is a SWI/SNF family protein with an ATPase activity stimulated by DNA containing both single-stranded and double-stranded regions. Mutations in SMARCAL1 are associated with the disease Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia, a multisystem autosomal recessive disorder characterized by T cell immunodeficiency, growth inhibition, and renal dysfunction. The cellular function of SMARCAL1, however, is unknown. Here, using Xenopus egg extracts and mass spectrometry, we identify SMARCAL1 as a protein recruited to double-stranded DNA breaks. SMARCAL1 binds to double-stranded breaks and stalled replication forks in both egg extract and human cells, specifically colocalizing with the single-stranded DNA binding factor RPA. In addition, SMARCAL1 interacts physically with RPA independently of DNA. SMARCAL1 is phosphorylated in a caffeine-sensitive manner in response to double-stranded breaks and stalled replication forks. It has been suggested that stalled forks can be stabilized by a mechanism involving caffeine-sensitive kinases, or they collapse and subsequently recruit Rad51 to promote homologous recombination repair. We show that depletion of SMARCAL1 from U2OS cells leads to increased frequency of RAD51 foci upon generation of stalled replication forks, indicating that fork breakdown is more prevalent in the absence of SMARCAL1. We propose that SMARCAL1 is a novel DNA damage-binding protein involved in replication fork stabilization.     

Nucleosome Dynamics as Modular Systems that Integrate DNA Damage and Repair

By some estimates, a eukaryotic cell must repair up to 10,000 DNA lesions per cell cycle to counteract endogenous sources of DNA damage. Exposure to environmental toxins, UV sources, or other radiations only increases this enormous number. Failure to repair such lesions can lead to a deleterious mutation rate, genomic instability, or cell death. The timely and efficient repair of eukaryotic DNA damage is further complicated by the realization that DNA lesions must be detected and repaired in the context of chromatin with its complex organization within the nucleus. Numerous studies have shown that chromatin packaging can inhibit nearly all repair pathways, and recent work has defined specific mechanisms that facilitate DNA repair within the chromatin context. In this review, we provide a broad overview of chromatin regulatory mechanisms, mainly at the nucleosomal level, and then focus on recent work that elucidates the role of chromatin structure in regulating the timely and efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).Although we tend to worry the most about environmental sources of DNA damage (e.g., chemical agents, UV radiation, ionizing radiation), it seems likely that much of the DNA repair machinery has evolved to contend with DNA lesions generated by the by-products of cellular metabolism—reactive oxygen species, endogenous alkylating agents, and DNA single- and double-strand breaks resulting from collapsed DNA replication forks or from oxidative destruction of deoxyribose residues (Lindahl and Wood 1999; Lindahl 2000). To combat the diversity of DNA lesions, cells have evolved a complex DNA damage response (DDR) that can engage many different DNA repair pathways, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), DNA mismatch repair (MMR), single-strand annealing (SSA), nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and homologous recombination (HR). In eukaryotic cells, each of these repair pathways function in the context of a nucleoprotein structure, chromatin, which can potentially occlude DNA lesions from the repair machinery, and thus can influence the efficiency of repair. Early studies that focused on the response to UV damage, led to the access/repair/restore (ARR) model for repair of DNA lesions in chromatin (Green and Almouzni 2002). A central theme of this model is that chromatin inhibits the repair process, and thus it must be disrupted before or during the repair process, and then chromatin structures must be faithfully restored at the conclusion. What has become clear in the past few years, however, is that chromatin organization also serves a positive role in the DDR, to “prime” DNA repair events, functioning as a regulatory/integration platform that ensures that DNA repair is coordinated with other cellular events (Fig. 1). Here we focus on the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), centering on the various mechanisms that facilitate this essential repair event within a chromatin context with a particular emphasis on the nucleosomal level. We envision that the concepts and themes discussed here will also be pertinent to other repair pathways, as discussed in several recent reviews (Adam and Polo 2012; Czaja et al. 2012; Lans et al. 2012; Odell et al. 2013).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Access/prime/repair/restore model for the role of chromatin in the DDR. Chromatin remodeling and histone modification enzymes regulate both the accessibility of the lesion to repair factors as well as providing a platform for signaling repair events to other cellular processes. See text for details.     

Sirtuin家族与DNA损伤修复

DNA损伤的发生与积累是造成细胞功能紊乱的根本原因,也是引起衰老与肿瘤等疾病发生的关键事件。为维持机体自身遗传物质的完整性与稳定性,生物体内拥有多种针对不同类型DNA损伤的修复方式。Sirtuin蛋白是一组NAD+依赖的、高度保守的组蛋白去乙酰化酶,可通过去乙酰化作用调节众多底物蛋白质的表达、活性与稳定性。 近来的研究显示,DNA损伤修复途径的多个关键蛋白质是Sirtuin的下游底物。Sirtuin蛋白通过调节同源重组修复、非同源末端修复、核苷酸切除修复等途径中的核心蛋白质参与修复包括双链断裂（double stranded breakes, DSBs）在内的多种DNA损伤类型,从而在维持基因组稳定性、寿命以及细胞能量代谢调节等一系列生物学作用中发挥至关重要的作用。本综述将介绍近年来Sirtuin与DNA损伤修复的研究进展。     

Increased Oxidative Damage and Reduced DNA Repair Enzyme XPD Involvement in High Glucose-Mediated Enhancement of Levobupivacaine-Induced Neurotoxicity

Neurochemical Research - Levobupivacaine is one of the major clinical local anesthetics, but it can cause neuron toxic damage. Hyperglycemia can cause neuronal DNA oxidative damage and inhibit...     

Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Malfunction of enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species leads to oxidative attack on biomolecules including DNA and consequently activates various DNA repair pathways. The nature of DNA damage and the cell cycle stage at which DNA damage occurs determine the appropriate repair pathway to rectify the damage. Oxidized DNA bases are primarily repaired by base excision repair and nucleotide incision repair. Nucleotide excision repair acts on lesions that distort DNA helix, mismatch repair on mispaired bases, and homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining on double stranded breaks. Post-replication repair that overcomes replication blocks caused by DNA damage also plays a crucial role in protecting the cell from the deleterious effects of oxidative DNA damage. Mitochondrial DNA is also prone to oxidative damage and is efficiently repaired by the cellular DNA repair machinery. In this review, we discuss the DNA repair pathways in relation to the nature of oxidative DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

DNA损伤修复过程表观遗传学改变

多种化学、物理及生物因素可诱发细胞DNA损伤,损伤后DNA损伤位点被相关损伤感受器识别,激活相应的修复通路进行DNA修复。越来越多的证据表明DNA甲基化状态、蛋白翻译后修饰、染色质重塑、miRNA等修饰方式参与了DNA的损伤修复。文章通过不同损伤修复通路中这些修饰的特点,阐述表观遗传学改变在DNA损伤修复发展过程中的作用机制。     

DNA Damage Signalling and Repair in Dictyostelium discoideum

Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for the maintenance of genome integrity. DNA DSBs can be repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Whilst HR requires sequences homologous to thedamaged DNA template in order to facilitate repair, NHEJ occurs through recognition of DNA DSBs by a variety of proteins that process and rejoin DNA termini by direct ligation. Here we review two recent reports that NHEJ is conserved in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideum. Certain components of the mammalian NHEJ pathway that are absent in genetically tractable organisms such as yeast are present in Dictyostelium and we discuss potential directions for future research, in addition to considering this organism as a genetic model system for the study of NHEJ in vivo.