Effective Inhibitors of Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Based on Monoterpenoids as Potential Agents for Antitumor Therapy

Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry - Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (Tdp1) is one of the important DNA repair enzymes responsible for the repair of DNA damage caused by anticancer drugs, such...     

Identification of a Deubiquitinating Enzyme as a Novel AGS3-Interacting Protein

Activator of G protein Signaling 3 (AGS3) is a receptor-independent G protein activator that has been implicated in multiple biological events such as brain development, neuroplasticity and addiction, cardiac function, Golgi structure/function, macroautophagy and metabolism. However, how AGS3 is regulated is little known. We demonstrate here that AGS3 interacts with a ubiquitin specific protease USP9x, and this interaction is at least partially mediated through the C-terminal G protein regulatory domain of AGS3. Knockdown of USP9x causes a moderate reduction in the level of AGS3. In contrast, overexpression of either USP9x or its deubiquitinating domain UCH increases the amount of AGS3, whereas expression of the mutant UCH domain that lacks deubiquitinating activity does not have the same effect. As previously observed in AGS3 knockdown cells, the localization of several marker proteins of the late Golgi compartments is disturbed in cells depleted of USP9x. Taken together, our study suggests that USP9x can modulate the level of a subpopulation of AGS3, and this modulation plays a role in regulating the structure of the late Golgi compartments. Finally, we have found that levels of AGS3 and USP9x are co-regulated in the prefrontal cortex of rats withdrawn from repeated cocaine treatment. In conjunction with the above data, this observation indicates a potential role of USP9X in the regulation of the AGS3 level during cocaine-induced neuroplasticity.     

Identification of SMARCAL1 as a Component of the DNA Damage Response

SMARCAL1 (also known as HARP) is a SWI/SNF family protein with an ATPase activity stimulated by DNA containing both single-stranded and double-stranded regions. Mutations in SMARCAL1 are associated with the disease Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia, a multisystem autosomal recessive disorder characterized by T cell immunodeficiency, growth inhibition, and renal dysfunction. The cellular function of SMARCAL1, however, is unknown. Here, using Xenopus egg extracts and mass spectrometry, we identify SMARCAL1 as a protein recruited to double-stranded DNA breaks. SMARCAL1 binds to double-stranded breaks and stalled replication forks in both egg extract and human cells, specifically colocalizing with the single-stranded DNA binding factor RPA. In addition, SMARCAL1 interacts physically with RPA independently of DNA. SMARCAL1 is phosphorylated in a caffeine-sensitive manner in response to double-stranded breaks and stalled replication forks. It has been suggested that stalled forks can be stabilized by a mechanism involving caffeine-sensitive kinases, or they collapse and subsequently recruit Rad51 to promote homologous recombination repair. We show that depletion of SMARCAL1 from U2OS cells leads to increased frequency of RAD51 foci upon generation of stalled replication forks, indicating that fork breakdown is more prevalent in the absence of SMARCAL1. We propose that SMARCAL1 is a novel DNA damage-binding protein involved in replication fork stabilization.     

Repair of DNA Damage Induced by the Cytidine Analog Zebularine Requires ATR and ATM in Arabidopsis

DNA damage repair is an essential cellular mechanism that maintains genome stability. Here, we show that the nonmethylable cytidine analog zebularine induces a DNA damage response in Arabidopsis thaliana, independent of changes in DNA methylation. In contrast to genotoxic agents that induce damage in a cell cycle stage-independent manner, zebularine induces damage specifically during strand synthesis in DNA replication. The signaling of this damage is mediated by additive activity of ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED AND RAD3-RELATED and ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED kinases, which cause postreplicative cell cycle arrest and increased endoreplication. The repair requires a functional STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES5 (SMC5)-SMC6 complex and is accomplished predominantly by synthesis-dependent strand-annealing homologous recombination. Here, we provide insight into the response mechanism for coping with the genotoxic effects of zebularine and identify several components of the zebularine-induced DNA damage repair pathway.     

Nucleosome Dynamics as Modular Systems that Integrate DNA Damage and Repair

By some estimates, a eukaryotic cell must repair up to 10,000 DNA lesions per cell cycle to counteract endogenous sources of DNA damage. Exposure to environmental toxins, UV sources, or other radiations only increases this enormous number. Failure to repair such lesions can lead to a deleterious mutation rate, genomic instability, or cell death. The timely and efficient repair of eukaryotic DNA damage is further complicated by the realization that DNA lesions must be detected and repaired in the context of chromatin with its complex organization within the nucleus. Numerous studies have shown that chromatin packaging can inhibit nearly all repair pathways, and recent work has defined specific mechanisms that facilitate DNA repair within the chromatin context. In this review, we provide a broad overview of chromatin regulatory mechanisms, mainly at the nucleosomal level, and then focus on recent work that elucidates the role of chromatin structure in regulating the timely and efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).Although we tend to worry the most about environmental sources of DNA damage (e.g., chemical agents, UV radiation, ionizing radiation), it seems likely that much of the DNA repair machinery has evolved to contend with DNA lesions generated by the by-products of cellular metabolism—reactive oxygen species, endogenous alkylating agents, and DNA single- and double-strand breaks resulting from collapsed DNA replication forks or from oxidative destruction of deoxyribose residues (Lindahl and Wood 1999; Lindahl 2000). To combat the diversity of DNA lesions, cells have evolved a complex DNA damage response (DDR) that can engage many different DNA repair pathways, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), DNA mismatch repair (MMR), single-strand annealing (SSA), nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and homologous recombination (HR). In eukaryotic cells, each of these repair pathways function in the context of a nucleoprotein structure, chromatin, which can potentially occlude DNA lesions from the repair machinery, and thus can influence the efficiency of repair. Early studies that focused on the response to UV damage, led to the access/repair/restore (ARR) model for repair of DNA lesions in chromatin (Green and Almouzni 2002). A central theme of this model is that chromatin inhibits the repair process, and thus it must be disrupted before or during the repair process, and then chromatin structures must be faithfully restored at the conclusion. What has become clear in the past few years, however, is that chromatin organization also serves a positive role in the DDR, to “prime” DNA repair events, functioning as a regulatory/integration platform that ensures that DNA repair is coordinated with other cellular events (Fig. 1). Here we focus on the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), centering on the various mechanisms that facilitate this essential repair event within a chromatin context with a particular emphasis on the nucleosomal level. We envision that the concepts and themes discussed here will also be pertinent to other repair pathways, as discussed in several recent reviews (Adam and Polo 2012; Czaja et al. 2012; Lans et al. 2012; Odell et al. 2013).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Access/prime/repair/restore model for the role of chromatin in the DDR. Chromatin remodeling and histone modification enzymes regulate both the accessibility of the lesion to repair factors as well as providing a platform for signaling repair events to other cellular processes. See text for details.     

Increased Oxidative Damage and Reduced DNA Repair Enzyme XPD Involvement in High Glucose-Mediated Enhancement of Levobupivacaine-Induced Neurotoxicity

Neurochemical Research - Levobupivacaine is one of the major clinical local anesthetics, but it can cause neuron toxic damage. Hyperglycemia can cause neuronal DNA oxidative damage and inhibit...     

DNA损伤修复过程表观遗传学改变

多种化学、物理及生物因素可诱发细胞DNA损伤,损伤后DNA损伤位点被相关损伤感受器识别,激活相应的修复通路进行DNA修复。越来越多的证据表明DNA甲基化状态、蛋白翻译后修饰、染色质重塑、miRNA等修饰方式参与了DNA的损伤修复。文章通过不同损伤修复通路中这些修饰的特点,阐述表观遗传学改变在DNA损伤修复发展过程中的作用机制。     

DNA Damage Signalling and Repair in Dictyostelium discoideum

Repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for the maintenance of genome integrity. DNA DSBs can be repaired by either homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Whilst HR requires sequences homologous to thedamaged DNA template in order to facilitate repair, NHEJ occurs through recognition of DNA DSBs by a variety of proteins that process and rejoin DNA termini by direct ligation. Here we review two recent reports that NHEJ is conserved in the social amoebaDictyostelium discoideum. Certain components of the mammalian NHEJ pathway that are absent in genetically tractable organisms such as yeast are present in Dictyostelium and we discuss potential directions for future research, in addition to considering this organism as a genetic model system for the study of NHEJ in vivo.     

DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability

Genomic DNA is under constant attack from both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damaging agents. Without proper care, the ensuing DNA damages would lead to alteration of genomic structure thus affecting the faithful transmission of genetic information. During the process of evolution, organisms have acquired a series of mechanisms responding to and repairing DNA damage, thus assuring the maintenance of genome stability and faithful transmission of genetic information. DNA damage checkpoint is one such important mechanism by which, in the face of DNA damage, a cell can respond to amplified damage signals, either by actively halting the cell cycle until it ensures that critical processes such as DNA replication or mitosis are complete or by initiating apoptosis as a last resort. Over the last decade, complex hierarchical interactions between the key components like ATM/ATR in the checkpoint pathway and various other mediators, effectors including DNA damage repair proteins have begun to emerge. In the meantime, an intimate relationship between mechanisms of damage checkpoint pathway, DNA damage repair, and genome stability was also uncovered. Reviewed hereinare the recent findings on both the mechanisms of activation of checkpoint pathways and their coordination with DNA damage repair machinery as well as their effect on genomic integrity.     

DNA Damage Tolerance and a Web of Connections with DNA Repair at Yale

This short article summarizes some of the research carried out recently by my laboratory colleagues on the function of DNA polymerase zeta (polζ) in mammalian cells. Some personal background is also described, relevant to research associations with Yale University and its continuing influence. Polζ is involved in the bypass of many DNA lesions by translesion DNA synthesis and is responsible for the majority of DNA damage-induced point mutagenesis in mammalian cells (including human cells), as well as in yeast. We also found that the absence of this enzyme leads to gross chromosomal instability in mammalian cells and increased spontaneous tumorigenesis in mice. Recently, we discovered a further unexpectedly critical role for polζ: it plays an essential role in allowing continued rapid proliferation of cells and tissues. These observations and others indicate that polζ engages frequently during DNA replication to bypass and tolerate DNA lesions or unusual DNA structures that are barriers for the normal DNA replication machinery.     

DNA损伤检验点与损伤修复及基因组稳定性

生物有机体基因组DNA经常会受到内源或外源因素的影响而导致结构发生变化,产生损伤;在长期进化过程中,有机体也相应形成了一系列应对与修复损伤DNA,并维持染色体基因组正常结构功能的机制。其中DNA损伤检验点（DNA damage checkpoint）就是在感应DNA损伤的基础上,对损伤感应信号进行转导,或引起细胞周期的暂停,从而使细胞有足够的时间对损伤DNA进行修复,或最终导致细胞发生凋亡。DNA损伤检验点信号转导途径是一个高度保守的信号感应过程,整个途径大致可以分为损伤感应、信号传递及信号效应3个组成部分。其中3-磷脂酰肌醇激酶家族类成员ATM（ataxia-telangiectasia mutated）和ATR（ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related）活性的增加构成整个途径活化的第一步。它们通过激活下游的效应激酶,Chk2／Chk1,通过协同作用许多其他调控细胞周期、DNA复制、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡等过程的蛋白质因子来实现细胞对DNA损伤的高度协调反应。近十几年,随着此领域研究的不断深入,人们逐步揭示了DNA损伤检验点途径发生过程中,各种核心组分通过与不同调节因子、效应因子及DNA损伤修复蛋白间的复杂相互作用,以实现监测感应异常DNA结构并实施相应反应的机制;其中,检验点衔接因子（mediators）及染色质结构,尤其是核小体组蛋白的共价修饰在调控ATM／ATR活性,促进ATM／ATR与底物间的相互作用以及介导DNA损伤位点周围染色质区域上多蛋白复合物在时间与空间上的动态形成发挥着重要的作用。同时,人们也开始发现DNA损伤检验点途径与DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性以及肿瘤发生等过程之间某些内在的联系。该反应途径在通过协调细胞针对DNA损伤做出各种反应的基础上,直接或间接地参与或调控DNA损伤修复过程,并与DNA损伤修复途径协同作用最终保证染色体基凶组结构的完整性,而检验点途径的改变,则会引起基因组不稳定的发生,包括从突变频率的提高到大范围的染色体重排,以及染色体数量的畸变。如：突变发生在肿瘤形成早期,会大大增加肿瘤发生的几率。文章将对DNA损伤检验点途径机制及其对DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性影响的最新进展进行综述。     

Identification and Characterization of a Novel Phosphodiesterase from the Metagenome of an Indian Coalbed

Phosphoesterases are involved in the degradation of organophosphorus compounds. Although phosphomonoesterases and phosphotriesterases have been studied in detail, studies on phosphodiesterases are rather limited. In our search to find novel phosphodiesterases using metagenomic approach, we cloned a gene encoding a putative phosphodiesterase (PdeM) from the metagenome of the formation water collected from an Indian coal bed. Bioinformatic analysis showed that PdeM sequence possessed the characteristic signature motifs of the class III phosphodiesterases and phylogenetic study of PdeM enabled us to identify three distinct subclasses (A, B, and C) within class III phosphodiesterases, PdeM clustering in new subclass IIIB. Bioinformatic, biochemical and biophysical characterization of PdeM further revealed some of the characteristic features of the phosphodiesterases belonging to newly described subclass IIIB. PdeM is a monomer of 29.3 kDa, which exhibits optimum activity at 25°C and pH 8.5, but low affinity for bis(pNPP) as well as pNPPP. The recombinant PdeM possessed phosphodiesterase, phosphonate-ester hydrolase and nuclease activity. It lacked phosphomonoesterase, phosphotriesterase, and RNAse activities. Overexpression of PdeM in E.coli neither affected catabolite respression nor did the recombinant protein hydrolyzed cAMP in vitro, indicating its inability to hydrolyze cAMP. Although Mn²⁺ was required for the activity of PdeM, but addition of metals (Mn²⁺ or Fe³⁺) did not induce oligomerization. Further increase in concentration of Mn²⁺ upto 3 mM, increased α-helical content as well as the phosphodiesterase activity. Structural comparison of PdeM with its homologs showed that it lacked critical residues required for dimerization, cAMP hydrolysis, and for the high affinity binding of bis(pNPP). PdeM, thus, is a novel representative of new subclass of class III phosphodiesterases.     

Sirtuins家族在DNA损伤修复中的作用

Sirtuins家族蛋白是一类依赖NAD的去乙酰化酶,属于第Ш类去乙酰化酶(HDACs),哺乳动物Sirtuins家族成员共有7个(SIRT1-7),其主要具有去乙酰化酶的活性,可以使多种蛋白发生去乙酰化,进而参与DNA的损伤修复、基因的转录调控、细胞凋亡、代谢及衰老等诸多生物进程。本文主要对Sirtuins家族在DNA损伤修复中的作用及其相关机制进行阐述。     

DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation

Genome integrity is challenged by DNA damage from both endogenous and environmental sources. This damage must be repaired to allow both RNA and DNA polymerases to accurately read and duplicate the information in the genome. Multiple repair enzymes scan the DNA for problems, remove the offending damage, and restore the DNA duplex. These repair mechanisms are regulated by DNA damage response kinases including DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR that are activated at DNA lesions. These kinases improve the efficiency of DNA repair by phosphorylating repair proteins to modify their activities, by initiating a complex series of changes in the local chromatin structure near the damage site, and by altering the overall cellular environment to make it more conducive to repair. In this review, we focus on these three levels of regulation to illustrate how the DNA damage kinases promote efficient repair to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease.The DNA in each of our cells accumulates thousands of lesions every day. This damaged DNA must be removed for the DNA code to be read properly. Fortunately, cells contain multiple DNA repair mechanisms including: base excision repair (BER) that removes damaged bases, mismatch repair (MMR) that recognizes base incorporation errors and base damage, nucleotide excision repair (NER) that removes bulky DNA adducts, and cross-link repair (ICL) that removes interstrand cross-links. In addition, breaks in the DNA backbone are repaired via double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways including homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Some of these mechanisms can operate independently to repair simple lesions. However, the repair of more complex lesions involving multiple DNA processing steps is regulated by the DNA damage response (DDR). For the most difficult to repair lesions, the DDR can be essential for successful repair.The DDR consists of multiple pathways, but for the purposes of this review we will focus on the DDR kinase signaling cascades controlled by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK). These kinases include DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), and ATM and Rad3-related (ATR). DNA-PKcs and ATM are primarily involved in DSB repair, whereas ATR responds to a wide range of DNA lesions, especially those associated with DNA replication (Cimprich and Cortez 2008). ATR’s versatility makes it essential for the viability of replicating cells in mice and humans (Brown and Baltimore 2000; de Klein et al. 2000; Cortez et al. 2001). In the case of ATM, inherited biallelic mutations cause ataxia-telangiectasia—a disorder characterized by neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, and cancer (Shiloh 2003; Lavin 2008). ATM mutations are also frequently found in several types of tumors (Negrini et al. 2010).The DDR kinases share several common regulatory mechanisms of activation (Lovejoy and Cortez 2009). All three DDR kinases sense damage through protein–protein interactions that serve to recruit the kinases to damage sites. Once localized, posttranslational modifications and other protein–protein interactions fully activate the kinases to initate a cascade of phosphorylation events. The best-studied substrate of DNA-PKcs is actually DNA-PKcs itself, and autophosphorylation is an important step in direct religation of the DSB via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (Weterings and Chen 2007; Dobbs et al. 2010). ATM and ATR have both unique and shared substrates that participate in DNA repair, checkpoint signaling, and determining cell fate decisions such as apoptosis and sensescence.     

DNA-PK Target Identification Reveals Novel Links between DNA Repair Signaling and Cytoskeletal Regulation

The DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) may function as a key signaling kinase in various cellular pathways other than DNA repair. Using a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis approach and stable DNA double-strand break-mimicking molecules (Dbait32Hc) to activate DNA-PK in the nucleus and cytoplasm, we identified 26 proteins that were highly phosphorylated following DNA-PK activation. Most of these proteins are involved in protein stability and degradation, cell signaling and the cytoskeleton. We investigated the relationship between DNA-PK and the cytoskeleton and found that the intermediate filament (IF) vimentin was a target of DNA-PK in vitro and in cells. Vimentin was phosphorylated at Ser459, by DNA-PK, in cells transfected with Dbait32Hc. We produced specific antibodies and showed that Ser459-P-vimentin was mostly located at cell protrusions. In migratory cells, the vimentin phosphorylation induced by Dbait32Hc was associated with a lower cellular adhesion and migration capacity. Thus, this approach led to the identification of downstream cytoplasmic targets of DNA-PK and revealed a connection between DNA damage signaling and the cytoskeleton.