Arabidopsis LIM proteins PLIM2a and PLIM2b regulate actin configuration during pollen tube growth

The pollen tube grows rapidly, exclusively at its tip, to deliver its sperm for fertilization. The polarized tip growth of pollen tubes is dependent on the highly dynamic actin cytoskeleton. Plant LIM proteins (named after initials of containing proteins Lin11, Isl-1, and Mec-3) have been shown to regulate actin bundling in different cells, however, their roles in pollen tube growth have remained obscure. Here, we report the function of Arabidopsis LIM proteins PLIM2a and PLIM2b in pollen tube growth. The PLIM2a mutation resulted in short and swollen Arabidopsis pollen tube with defective actin bundles. The expression of the construct green fluorescent protein (GFP)-PLIM2b led to fluorescence of the actin bundles in germinating pollen and also the long actin bundles along the growing pollen tubes in Arabidopsis, but not of the short and sparse actin bundles that characterize the tip regions of the pollen tubes. There is a partially redundant function between PLIM2a and PLIM2b in the shank actin bundle organization during Arabidopsis pollen tube growth, as PLIM2b could rescue for the defective shank actin bundles in PLIM2a mutation pollen tubes. This report suggests critical roles of PLIM2a/PLIM2b in actin configuration during Arabidopsis pollen germination and tube growth.     

Actin bundler PLIM2s are involved in the regulation of pollen development and tube growth in Arabidopsis

Microspores develop inside the anther, where they are surrounded by nourishing tapetal cells. However, many cellular processes occurring during microspore development in the locule are poorly characterized. The actin cytoskeleton is known to play a crucial role in various aspects of the plant developmental process. During pollen tube tip growth, actin cytoskeleton serves as an efficient molecular transportation track, although how it functions in pollen development is unknown. The plant actin bundler PLIM2s have been shown to regulate actin bundling in different cells. Here, we investigate the biological function of three Arabidopsis pollen-specific LIM proteins, PLIM2a, PLIM2b, and PLIM2c (collectively, PLIM2s), in pollen development and tube growth. Variable degrees of suppressed expression of the PLIM2s by RNA interference resulted in aberrant phenotypes. Complete suppression of the PLIM2s totally disrupted pollen development, producing abortive pollen grains and rendering the transgenic plants sterile. Partial suppression of the PLIM2s arrested pollen tube growth to a lesser extent, resulting in short and swollen pollen tubes. Finally, the PLIM2c promoter initiated expression in pollen during stamen filament elongation, and the PLIM2c protein was located on particle structures in the developing pollen grains in Arabidopsis. These suggest that the actin bundler, PLIM2s, are an important factor for Arabidopsis pollen development and tube growth.     

Tobacco WLIM1 is a novel F-actin binding protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling

We used confocal microscopy and in vitro analyses to show that Nicotiana tabacum WLIM1, a LIM domain protein related to animal Cys-rich proteins, is a novel actin binding protein in plants. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged WLIM1 protein accumulated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of tobacco BY2 cells. It associated predominantly with actin cytoskeleton, as demonstrated by colabeling and treatment with actin-depolymerizing latrunculin B. High-speed cosedimentation assays revealed the ability of WLIM1 to bind directly to actin filaments with high affinity. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence loss in photobleaching showed a highly dynamic in vivo interaction of WLIM1-GFP with actin filaments. Expression of WLIM1-GFP in BY2 cells significantly delayed depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton induced by latrunculin B treatment. WLIM1 also stabilized actin filaments in vitro. Importantly, expression of WLIM1-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves induces significant changes in actin cytoskeleton organization, specifically, fewer and thicker actin bundles than in control cells, suggesting that WLIM1 functions as an actin bundling protein. This hypothesis was confirmed by low-speed cosedimentation assays and direct observation of F-actin bundles that formed in vitro in the presence of WLIM1. Taken together, these data identify WLIM1 as a novel actin binding protein that increases actin cytoskeleton stability by promoting bundling of actin filaments.     

Rice LIM protein OsPLIM2a is involved in rice seed and tiller development

Yield of major monocotyledonous crops including wheat, rice, barley, and sorghum is greatly influenced by tillering. However, deciphering the underlying mechanisms of the tillering has long been hindered because many changeable factors are involved in the process. Plant two LIM-domain-containing proteins bind to and stabilize actin filaments that are major constituents in the formation of higher-order actin cytoskeleton. Here, we report that rice LIM-domain protein, OsPLIM2a, is involved in rice tillering likely through actin cytoskeleton organization. OsPLIM2 genes (OsPLIM2a, OsPLIM2b, and OsPLIM2c) expressed in reproductive organs including anthers, but not in other tissues. Analysis of both OsPLIM2a and OsPLIM2c promoter fused to GUS reporter revealed that both promoters directed strong and specific GUS expression in pollens. Transient expression of OsPLIM2a-GFP and OsPLIM2c-GFP in tobacco leaves showed that OsPLIM2a and OsPLIM2c could bind to actin filaments, which is consistent with other plant LIM proteins with actin-binding property. To examine further physiological roles of rice OsPLIM2a and OsPLIM2c, transgenic rice plants with 35S:OsPLIM2a or 35S:OsPLIM2c were examined for any phenotypic changes. Transgenic plants overexpressing OsPLIM2a produced bigger seeds than wild type, whereas they exhibited reduction in tiller numbers. These results suggest that OsPLIM2a may participate positively in seed development but negatively in tiller differentiation. Protein interaction assays using OsPLIM2c proteins revealed that OsPLIM2c interacted with at least three proteins including rice Fimbrin, of which homologs in Arabidopsis play crucial roles in pollen tube growth, implying that rice OsPLIM2c and Fimbrin may exert roles together in pollen tube growth.     

Actin bundling via LIM domains

The LIM domain is defined as a protein-protein interaction module involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes including gene expression and cytoskeleton organization. We have recently shown that the tobacco WLIM1, a two LIM domain-containing protein, is able to bind to, stabilize and bundle actin filaments, suggesting that it participates to the regulation of actin cytoskeleton structure and dynamics. In the December issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry we report a domain analysis that specifically ascribes the actin-related activities of WLIM1 to its two LIM domains. Results suggest that LIM domains function synergistically in the full-length protein to achieve optimal activities. Here we briefly summarize relevant data regarding the actin-related properties/functions of two LIM domain-containing proteins in plants and animals. In addition, we provide further evidence of cooperative effects between LIM domains by transiently expressing a chimeric multicopy WLIM1 protein in BY2 cells.Key words: Actin-binding proteins, actin-bundling, cysteine-rich proteins, cytoskeleton, LIM domainThe LIM domain is a ≈55 amino acid peptide domain that was first identified in 1990 as a common cystein-rich sequence found in the three homeodomain proteins LIN-11, Isl1 and MEC-3. It has since been found in a wide variety of eukaryotic proteins of diverse functions. Animals possess several families of LIM proteins, with members containing 1–5 LIM domains occasionally linked to other catalytic or protein-binding domains such as homeodomain, kinase and SH3 domains. In contrast, plants only possess two distinct sets of LIM proteins. One is plant-specific and has not been functionally characterized yet. The other one comprises proteins that exhibit the same overall structure as the animal cystein rich proteins (CRPs), i.e., two very similar LIM domains separated by a ≈50 amino acid-long interLIM domain and a relatively short and variable C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A). The mouse CRP2 protein was the first CRP reported to interact directly with actin filaments (AF) and to stabilize the latter.¹ Identical observations were subsequently described for the chicken CRP1 and tobacco WLIM1 proteins.^2,3 In addition, these two proteins were shown to arrange AF into cables both in vitro and in vivo and thus join the list of actin bundlers.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain maps for wild-type WLIM1 (A) and GFP-fused chimeric 3xWLIM1 (B). A. WLIM1 basically comprises a short N-terminal domain (Nt), two LIM domains (LIM1 and LIM2), an interLIM spacer (IL) and a C-terminal domain (Ct). B. 3xWLIM1 consists of three tandem WLIM1 copies. This chimeric protein has been fused in C-terminus to GFP and transiently expressed in tobacco BY2 cells.To identify the peptide domains of WLIM1 responsible for its actin-related properties/activities, we generated domain-deleted and single domain variants and submitted them to a series of in vivo and in vitro assays.⁴ Localization experiments established that both LIM domains are required to efficiently target the actin cytoskeleton in tobacco BY2 cells. High-speed (200,000 g) cosedimentation data confirmed that the actin-binding activity of WLIM1 relies on its LIM domains. Indeed, the deletion of either the first or the second LIM domain respectively resulted in a 5-fold and 10-fold decrease of the protein affinity for AF. Importantly, each single LIM domain was found able to interact with AF in an autonomous manner, although with a reduced affinity compared to the wild-type WLIM1. Low-speed (12,500 g) cosedimentation data and electron microscopy observations revealed that the actin bundling activity of WLIM1 is also triggered by its LIM domains. Surprisingly each single LIM domain was able to bundle AF in an autonomous manner, suggesting that WLIM1 has two discrete actin-bundling sites. However, the bundles induced by the variants containing only one LIM domain, i.e., LIM domain-deleted mutants and single LIM domains, differed from those induced by the full-length WLIM1. They appeared more wavy and loosely packed and formed only at relatively high protein:actin ratios. Together these data suggest that LIM domains are autonomous actin-binding and -bundling modules that function in synergy in wild-type WLIM1 to achieve optimal activities.To further assess the mechanism of cooperation between the LIM domains of plant CRP-related proteins, we generated a chimeric protein composed of three WLIM1 copies in tandem (3 × WLIM1, Fig. 1B), and transiently expressed it as a GFP-fusion in tobacco BY2 cells. We anticipated that such a six LIM domain-containing protein displays an even higher actin-bundling activity. (Fig. 2A) shows the typical actin cytoskeleton pattern in an expanding BY2 cell as visualized using the actin marker GFP-fABD2.⁵ As previously reported by Sheahan et al.,⁵ GFP-fABD2 decorated dense, transversely oriented, cortical networks as well as transvacuolar strands connecting the subcortical-perinuclear region to the cortex. Ectopic expression of WLIM1-GFP (BY2 cells normally do not express the WLIM1 gene) induced moderate but perceptible modifications of the actin cytoskeleton structure (Fig. 2B). Most AF are arranged in bundles thicker than those observed in GFP-fABD2 expressing cells and fine AF arrays are less frequently observed. As expected, this phenotype was significantly enhanced in cells transformed with the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein (Fig. 2C). Indeed, cells were almost devoided of fine AF arrays and exhibited very thick actin cables (Fig. 2C) that, at times (≈30 %), form atypical long looped structures (Fig. 2D). The appearance of such structures may result from the increase of cable stability and thickness induced by the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein, as these parameters are likely to determine, at least partially, the maximal length of actin bundles. Together the present observations support earlier data showing that LIM domains work in concert in LIM proteins to regulate actin bundling in plant cells. Strikingly, vertebrate and plant CRPs invariably contain two LIM domains. The lack, in these organisms, of CRP-related proteins combining more than two LIM domains may be explained by the fact that very thick cables, such as those induced by the artificial 3xWLIM1, may be too stable structures incompatible with the necessary high degree of actin cytoskeleton plasticity. As an exception, a muscle CRP-related protein with five LIM domains (Mlp84B) has been identified in Drosophila.⁶ However, rather than decorating actin filaments in an homogenous manner, this protein has been found to concentrate in a specialized region of the Z-discs where it stabilizes, in concert with D-titin, muscle sarcomeres.⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Typical actin cytoskeleton patterns in tobacco BY2 cells that have been transiently transformed, using a particle gun, with GFP-fABD2 (A), WLIM1-GFP (B), and 3xWLIM1-GFP (C and D). For each construct, more than 60 cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. In the case of 3xWLIM1-GFP, two prevalent patterns have been observed (C and D). Bars = 20 µm.The relatively well conserved spacer length (≈50 amino acids) that separates the two LIM domains in vertebrate CRPs and related plant LIM proteins remains an intriguing feature the importance of which in actin cable organization remains to be established. Using electron microscopy we are currently evaluating the effects of the modification of the interLIM domain length on the structural properties of actin cables.     

The LIM domains of WLIM1 define a new class of actin bundling modules

Actin filament bundling, i.e. the formation of actin cables, is an important process that relies on proteins able to directly bind and cross-link subunits of adjacent actin filaments. Animal cysteine-rich proteins and their plant counterparts are two LIM domain-containing proteins that were recently suggested to define a new family of actin cytoskeleton regulators involved in actin filament bundling. We here identified the LIM domains as responsible for F-actin binding and bundling activities of the tobacco WLIM1. The deletion of one of the two LIM domains reduced significantly, but did not entirely abolish, the ability of WLIM1 to bind actin filaments. Individual LIM domains were found to interact directly with actin filaments, although with a reduced affinity compared with the native protein. Variants lacking the C-terminal or the inter-LIM domain were only weakly affected in their F-actin stabilizing and bundling activities and trigger the formation of thick cables containing tightly packed actin filaments as does the native protein. In contrast, the deletion of one of the two LIM domains negatively impacted both activities and resulted in the formation of thinner and wavier cables. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the LIM domains of WLIM1 are new autonomous actin binding and bundling modules that cooperate to confer WLIM1 high actin binding and bundling activities.     

Cotton LIM domain‐containing protein GhPLIM1 is specifically expressed in anthers and participates in modulating F‐actin

As one form of actin binding protein (ABP), LIM domain protein can trigger the formation of actin bundles during plant growth and development. In this study, a cDNA (designated GhPLIM1) encoding a LIM domain protein with 216 amino acid residues was identified from a cotton flower cDNA library. Quantitative RT‐PCR indicated that GhPLIM1 is specifically expressed in cotton anthers, and its expression levels are regulated during anther development of cotton. GhPLIM1:eGFP transformed cotton cells display a distributed network of eGFP fluorescence, suggesting that GhPLIM1 protein is mainly localised to the cell cytoskeleton. In vitro high‐speed co‐sedimentation and low co‐sedimentation assays indicate that GhPLIM1 protein not only directly binds actin filaments but also bundles F‐actin. Further biochemical experiments verified that GhPLIM1 protein can protect F‐actin against depolymerisation by Lat B. Thus, our data demonstrate that GhPLIM1 functions as an actin binding protein (ABP) in modulating actin filaments in vitro, suggesting that GhPLIM1 may be involved in regulating the actin cytoskeleton required for pollen development in cotton.     

Overexpression of the Tomato Pollen Receptor Kinase LePRK1 Rewires Pollen Tube Growth to a Blebbing Mode

The tubular growth of a pollen tube cell is crucial for the sexual reproduction of flowering plants. LePRK1 is a pollen-specific and plasma membrane–localized receptor-like kinase from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). LePRK1 interacts with another receptor, LePRK2, and with KINASE PARTNER PROTEIN (KPP), a Rop guanine nucleotide exchange factor. Here, we show that pollen tubes overexpressing LePRK1 or a truncated LePRK1 lacking its extracellular domain (LePRK1ΔECD) have enlarged tips but also extend their leading edges by producing “blebs.” Coexpression of LePRK1 and tomato PLIM2a, an actin bundling protein that interacts with KPP in a Ca²⁺-responsive manner, suppressed these LePRK1 overexpression phenotypes, whereas pollen tubes coexpressing KPP, LePRK1, and PLIM2a resumed the blebbing growth mode. We conclude that overexpression of LePRK1 or LePRK1ΔECD rewires pollen tube growth to a blebbing mode, through KPP- and PLIM2a-mediated bundling of actin filaments from tip plasma membranes. Arabidopsis thaliana pollen tubes expressing LePRK1ΔECD also grew by blebbing. Our results exposed a hidden capability of the pollen tube cell: upon overexpression of a single membrane-localized molecule, LePRK1 or LePRK1ΔECD, it can switch to an alternative mechanism for extension of the leading edge that is analogous to the blebbing growth mode reported for Dictyostelium and for Drosophila melanogaster stem cells.     

Why Are Two Different Cross-linkers Necessary for Actin Bundle Formation In Vivo and What Does Each Cross-link Contribute?

In developing Drosophila bristles two species of cross-linker, the forked proteins and fascin, connect adjacent actin filaments into bundles. Bundles form in three phases: (a) tiny bundles appear; (b) these bundles aggregate into larger bundles; and (c) the filaments become maximally cross-linked by fascin. In mutants that completely lack forked, aggregation of the bundles does not occur so that the mature bundles consist of <50 filaments versus ∼700 for wild type. If the forked concentration is genetically reduced to half the wild type, aggregation of the tiny bundles occurs but the filaments are poorly ordered albeit with small patches of fascin cross-linked filaments. In mutants containing an excess of forked, all the bundles tend to aggregate and the filaments are maximally crossbridged by fascin. Alternatively, if fascin is absent, phases 1 and 2 occur normally but the resultant bundles are twisted and the filaments within them are poorly ordered. By extracting fully elongated bristles with potassium iodide which removes fascin but leaves forked, the bundles change from being straight to twisted and the filaments within them become poorly ordered. From these observations we conclude that (a) forked is used early in development to aggregate the tiny bundles into larger bundles; and (b) forked facilitates fascin entry into the bundles to maximally cross-link the actin filaments into straight, compact, rigid bundles. Thus, forked aligns the filaments and then directs fascin binding so that inappropriate cross-linking does not occur.     

Contribution of the LIM Domain and Nebulin-Repeats to the Interaction of Lasp-2 with Actin Filaments and Focal Adhesions

Lasp-2 binds to actin filaments and concentrates in the actin bundles of filopodia and lamellipodia in neural cells and focal adhesions in fibroblastic cells. Lasp-2 has three structural regions: a LIM domain, a nebulin-repeat region, and an SH3 domain; however, the region(s) responsible for its interactions with actin filaments and focal adhesions are still unclear. In this study, we revealed that the N-terminal fragment from the LIM domain to the first nebulin-repeat module (LIM-n1) retained actin-binding activity and showed a similar subcellular localization to full-length lasp-2 in neural cells. The LIM domain fragment did not interact with actin filaments or localize to actin filament bundles. In contrast, LIM-n1 showed a clear subcellular localization to filopodial actin bundles. Although truncation of the LIM domain caused the loss of F-actin binding activity and the accumulation of filopodial actin bundles, these truncated fragments localized to focal adhesions. These results suggest that lasp-2 interactions with actin filaments are mediated through the cooperation of the LIM domain and the first nebulin-repeat module in vitro and in vivo. Actin filament binding activity may be a major contributor to the subcellular localization of lasp-2 to filopodia but is not crucial for lasp-2 recruitment to focal adhesions.     

hhLIM与actin相互作用依赖其C端LIM结构域

hhLIM是LIM蛋白家族成员之一,该蛋白质含有两个LIM结构域,在基因表达调节、细胞骨架组构及细胞肥大过程中发挥重要作用.构建hhLIM不同LIM结构域的突变体,探讨其两个LIM结构域在与actin相互结合中的作用及其可能机制.GST-pull down和hhLIM及其突变体与actin细胞定位关系的免疫荧光分析结果表明,C端的LIM结构域2是hhLIM与actin结合所必需的,该结构域中的两个Cys置换为Ser后可使hhLIM结合actin的功能完全丧失,N端的LIM结构域1突变使hhLIM结合actin的能力下降.F-actin交联实验结果显示,hhLIM通过LIM结构域2与actin直接结合并起到交联F-actin的作用.结果表明,LIM结构域2在hhLIM与actin相互作用及调节actin细胞骨架组构中起决定性作用.     

Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH₂-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.     

Arabidopsis CROLIN1, a Novel Plant Actin-binding Protein,Functions in Cross-linking and Stabilizing Actin Filaments

Higher order actin filament structures are necessary for cytoplasmic streaming, organelle movement, and other physiological processes. However, the mechanism by which the higher order cytoskeleton is formed in plants remains unknown. In this study, we identified a novel actin-cross-linking protein family (named CROLIN) that is well conserved only in the plant kingdom. There are six isovariants of CROLIN in the Arabidopsis genome, with CROLIN1 specifically expressed in pollen. In vitro biochemical analyses showed that CROLIN1 is a novel actin-cross-linking protein with binding and stabilizing activities. Remarkably, CROLIN1 can cross-link actin bundles into actin networks. CROLIN1 loss of function induces pollen germination and pollen tube growth hypersensitive to latrunculin B. All of these results demonstrate that CROLIN1 may play an important role in stabilizing and remodeling actin filaments by binding to and cross-linking actin filaments.     

Proteins implicated in mediating self-incompatibility-induced alterations to the actin cytoskeleton of Papaver pollen

Background and Aims

Sexual reproduction in angiosperms involves a network of signalling and interactions between pollen and pistil. To promote out-breeding, an additional layer of interactions, involving self-incompatibility (SI), is used to prevent self-fertilization. SI is generally controlled by the S-locus, and comprises allelic pollen and pistil S-determinants. This provides the basis of recognition, and consequent rejection, of incompatible pollen. In Papaver rhoeas, SI involves interaction of pistil PrsS and pollen PrpS, triggering a Ca²⁺-dependent signalling network. This results in rapid and distinctive alterations to both the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton being triggered in ‘self’ pollen. Some of these alterations are implicated in mediating programmed cell death, involving activation of several caspase-like proteases.

Scope

Here we review and discuss our current understanding of the cytoskeletal alterations induced in incompatible pollen during SI and their relationship with programmed cell death. We focus on data relating to the formation of F-actin punctate foci, which have, to date, not been well characterized. The identification of two actin-binding proteins that interact with these structures are reviewed. Using an approach that enriched for F-actin from SI-induced pollen tubes using affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry, further proteins were identified as putative interactors with the F-actin foci in an SI situation.

Key Results

Previously two important actin-binding proteins, CAP and ADF, had been identified whose localization altered with SI, both showing co-localization with the F-actin punctate foci based on immunolocalization studies. Further analysis has identified differences between proteins associated with F-actin from SI-induced pollen samples and those associated with F-actin in untreated pollen. This provides candidate proteins implicated in either the formation or stabilization of the punctate actin structures formed during SI.

Conclusions

This review brings together for the first time, our current understanding of proteins and events involved in SI-induced signalling to the actin cytoskeleton in incompatible Papaver pollen.     

Confocal Microscopy Observations on Actin Cytoskeleton in the Pollen and Pollen Protoplast of Narcissus

Actin cytoskeleton was localized in the pollen and pollen protoplast of Narcissus cyclamineus using fluorescence labelled phalloidin andconfocal microscopy. In the hydrated pollen (before germination) actin filamem bundles were arranged in a parallel array and at right angles to the long axis of the pollen grain in the cortex. But at the germination pore region(or fur row) the actin filament bundles formed a reticulate network. In the centre of the grain there was also an actin filament network which was more open and had less bundles associated with it than the network underneath the furrow. When the pollen grain started to produce pollen tube, most(if not all) of the actin filament bundles in the pollen grain rearranged into a parallel array pointing towards the tube. The bundles in the array later elongated and extended into the pollen tube. In the pollen protoplast a very tightly-packed actin bundle network was present. Numerous branches and jonts of actin filament bundles could be seen in the network. If the protoplasts were fixed before staining, the bundles aggregated and the branches and joints became less obvious indicating that fixation had affected the nature and arrangement of the actin filament bundles. If the pollen protoplasts were bursted (using the osmotic shock technique) or extracted (using Triton X-100), fragments of actin filament bundles could still be found associated with the membrane ghost indicating that some of the actin filament bundles in the cortex were tightly attached to the membrane. Using a double staining technique, actin filaments and microtubules were co-localized in the pollen protoplast. The co-alignment of some of the actin filament bundles with the microtubule bundles suggested that the actin cytoskeleton and the microtubule cytoskeleton were not distributed at random but in a well organized and orchestrated manner [possibly under the control of a yet undiscovered structure(s). The actin filament cytoskeleton in the generative cells failed to stain either in pollen or pollen tube, but they became stained in the pollen protoplast. The actin cytoskeleton in the generative cell appeared as a loosely organized network made up of short and long actin filament bundles.