Leaf Senescence Signaling: The Ca2+-Conducting Arabidopsis Cyclic Nucleotide Gated Channel2 Acts through Nitric Oxide to Repress Senescence Programming

Ca²⁺ and nitric oxide (NO) are essential components involved in plant senescence signaling cascades. In other signaling pathways, NO generation can be dependent on cytosolic Ca²⁺. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutant dnd1 lacks a plasma membrane-localized cation channel (CNGC2). We recently demonstrated that this channel affects plant response to pathogens through a signaling cascade involving Ca²⁺ modulation of NO generation; the pathogen response phenotype of dnd1 can be complemented by application of a NO donor. At present, the interrelationship between Ca²⁺ and NO generation in plant cells during leaf senescence remains unclear. Here, we use dnd1 plants to present genetic evidence consistent with the hypothesis that Ca²⁺ uptake and NO production play pivotal roles in plant leaf senescence. Leaf Ca²⁺ accumulation is reduced in dnd1 leaves compared to the wild type. Early senescence-associated phenotypes (such as loss of chlorophyll, expression level of senescence-associated genes, H₂O₂ generation, lipid peroxidation, tissue necrosis, and increased salicylic acid levels) were more prominent in dnd1 leaves compared to the wild type. Application of a Ca²⁺ channel blocker hastened senescence of detached wild-type leaves maintained in the dark, increasing the rate of chlorophyll loss, expression of a senescence-associated gene, and lipid peroxidation. Pharmacological manipulation of Ca²⁺ signaling provides evidence consistent with genetic studies of the relationship between Ca²⁺ signaling and senescence with the dnd1 mutant. Basal levels of NO in dnd1 leaf tissue were lower than that in leaves of wild-type plants. Application of a NO donor effectively rescues many dnd1 senescence-related phenotypes. Our work demonstrates that the CNGC2 channel is involved in Ca²⁺ uptake during plant development beyond its role in pathogen defense response signaling. Work presented here suggests that this function of CNGC2 may impact downstream basal NO production in addition to its role (also linked to NO signaling) in pathogen defense responses and that this NO generation acts as a negative regulator during plant leaf senescence signaling.Senescence can be considered as the final stage of a plant’s development. During this process, nutrients will be reallocated from older to younger parts of the plant, such as developing leaves and seeds. Leaf senescence has been characterized as a type of programmed cell death (PCD; Gan and Amasino, 1997; Quirino et al., 2000; Lim et al., 2003). During senescence, organelles such as chloroplasts will break down first. Biochemical changes will also occur in the peroxisome during this process. When the chloroplast disassembles, it is easily observed as a loss of chlorophyll. Mitochondria, the source of energy for cells, will be the last cell organelles to undergo changes during the senescence process (Quirino et al., 2000). At the same time, other catabolic events (e.g. protein and lipid breakdown, etc.) are occurring (Quirino et al., 2000). Hormones may also contribute to this process (Gepstein, 2004). From this information we can infer that leaf senescence is regulated by many signals.Darkness treatment can induce senescence in detached leaves (Poovaiah and Leopold, 1973; Chou and Kao, 1992; Weaver and Amasino, 2001; Chrost et al., 2004; Guo and Crawford, 2005; Ülker et al., 2007). Ca²⁺ can delay the senescence of detached leaves (Poovaiah and Leopold, 1973) and leaf senescence induced by methyl jasmonate (Chou and Kao, 1992); the molecular events that mediate this effect of Ca²⁺ are not well characterized at present.Nitric oxide (NO) is a critical signaling molecule involved in many plant physiological processes. Recently, published evidence supports NO acting as a negative regulator during leaf senescence (Guo and Crawford, 2005; Mishina et al., 2007). Abolishing NO generation in either loss-of-function mutants (Guo and Crawford, 2005) or transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants expressing NO degrading dioxygenase (NOD; Mishina et al., 2007) leads to an early senescence phenotype in these plants compared to the wild type. Corpas et al. (2004) showed that endogenous NO is mainly accumulated in vascular tissues of pea (Pisum sativum) leaves. This accumulation is significantly reduced in senescing leaves (Corpas et al., 2004). Corpas et al. (2004) also provided evidence that NO synthase (NOS)-like activity (i.e. generation of NO from l-Arg) is greatly reduced in senescing leaves. Plant NOS activity is regulated by Ca²⁺/calmodulin (CaM; Delledonne et al., 1998; Corpas et al., 2004, 2009; del Río et al., 2004; Valderrama et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2008). These studies suggest a link between Ca²⁺ and NO that could be operating during senescence.In animal cells, all three NOS isoforms require Ca²⁺/CaM as a cofactor (Nathan and Xie, 1994; Stuehr, 1999; Alderton et al., 2001). Notably, animal NOS contains a CaM binding domain (Stuehr, 1999). It is unclear whether Ca²⁺/CaM can directly modulate plant NOS or if Ca²⁺/CaM impacts plant leaf development/senescence through (either direct or indirect) effects on NO generation. However, recent studies from our lab suggest that Ca²⁺/CaM acts as an activator of NOS activity in plant innate immune response signaling (Ali et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2008).Although Arabidopsis NO ASSOCIATED PROTEIN1 (AtNOA1; formerly named AtNOS1) was thought to encode a NOS enzyme, no NOS-encoding gene has yet been identified in plants (Guo et al., 2003; Crawford et al., 2006; Zemojtel et al., 2006). However, the AtNOA1 loss-of-function mutant does display reduced levels of NO generation, and several groups have used the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) to reverse some low-NO related phenotypes in Atnoa1 plants (Guo et al., 2003; Bright et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2007). Importantly, plant endogenous NO deficiency (Guo and Crawford, 2005; Mishina et al., 2007) or abscisic acid/methyl jasmonate (Hung and Kao, 2003, 2004) induced early senescence can be successfully rescued by application of exogenous NO. Addition of NO donor can delay GA-elicited PCD in barley (Hordeum vulgare) aleurone layers as well (Beligni et al., 2002).It has been suggested that salicylic acid (SA), a critical pathogen defense metabolite, can be increased in natural (Morris et al., 2000; Mishina et al., 2007) and transgenic NOD-induced senescent Arabidopsis leaves (Mishina et al., 2007). Pathogenesis related gene1 (PR1) expression is up-regulated in transgenic Arabidopsis expressing NOD (Mishina et al., 2007) and in leaves of an early senescence mutant (Ülker et al., 2007).Plant cyclic nucleotide gated channels (CNGCs) have been proposed as candidates to conduct extracellular Ca²⁺ into the cytosol (Sunkar et al., 2000; Talke et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh and Berkowitz, 2004; Ali et al., 2007; Demidchik and Maathuis, 2007; Frietsch et al., 2007; Kaplan et al., 2007; Ma and Berkowitz, 2007; Urquhart et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2009a, 2009b). Arabidopsis “defense, no death” (dnd1) mutant plants have a null mutation in the gene encoding the plasma membrane-localized Ca²⁺-conducting CNGC2 channel. This mutant also displays no hypersensitive response to infection by some pathogens (Clough et al., 2000; Ali et al., 2007). In addition to involvement in pathogen-mediated Ca²⁺ signaling, CNGC2 has been suggested to participate in the process of leaf development/senescence (Köhler et al., 2001). dnd1 mutant plants have high levels of SA and expression of PR1 (Yu et al., 1998), and spontaneous necrotic lesions appear conditionally in dnd1 leaves (Clough et al., 2000; Jirage et al., 2001). Endogenous H₂O₂ levels in dnd1 mutants are increased from wild-type levels (Mateo et al., 2006). Reactive oxygen species molecules, such as H₂O₂, are critical to the PCD/senescence processes of plants (Navabpour et al., 2003; Overmyer et al., 2003; Hung and Kao, 2004; Guo and Crawford, 2005; Zimmermann et al., 2006). Here, we use the dnd1 mutant to evaluate the relationship between leaf Ca²⁺ uptake during plant growth and leaf senescence. Our results identify NO, as affected by leaf Ca²⁺ level, to be an important negative regulator of leaf senescence initiation. Ca²⁺-mediated NO production during leaf development could control senescence-associated gene (SAG) expression and the production of molecules (such as SA and H₂O₂) that act as signals during the initiation of leaf senescence programs.     

Enhanced Abscisic Acid-Mediated Responses in nia1nia2noa1-2 Triple Mutant Impaired in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-Dependent Nitric Oxide Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis

Nitric oxide (NO) regulates a wide range of plant processes from development to environmental adaptation. Despite its reported regulatory functions, it remains unclear how NO is synthesized in plants. We have generated a triple nia1nia2noa1-2 mutant that is impaired in nitrate reductase (NIA/NR)- and Nitric Oxide-Associated1 (AtNOA1)-mediated NO biosynthetic pathways. NO content in roots of nia1nia2 and noa1-2 plants was lower than in wild-type plants and below the detection limit in nia1nia2noa1-2 plants. NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-mediated biosynthesis of NO were thus active and responsible for most of the NO production in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The nia1nia2noa1-2 plants displayed reduced size, fertility, and seed germination potential but increased dormancy and resistance to water deficit. The increasing deficiency in NO of nia1nia2, noa1-2, and nia1nia2noa1-2 plants correlated with increased seed dormancy, hypersensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA) in seed germination and establishment, as well as dehydration resistance. In nia1nia2noa1-2 plants, enhanced drought tolerance was due to a very efficient stomata closure and inhibition of opening by ABA, thus uncoupling NO from ABA-triggered responses in NO-deficient guard cells. The NO-deficient mutants in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-mediated pathways in combination with the triple mutant will be useful tools to functionally characterize the role of NO and the contribution of both biosynthetic pathways in regulating plant development and defense.Nitric oxide (NO) is a small ubiquitous molecule derived from nitrogen-containing precursors that is one of the earliest and most widespread signaling molecules in living organisms from metazoans to mammals (Torreilles, 2001). The regulatory functions of NO have been extensively studied in mammals, where it is synthesized from Arg through the activity of NO synthases (Knowles and Moncada, 1994). By contrast, the biosynthesis and function of this molecule in plants are largely unknown. During the last 10 years, NO biosynthesis in plants has been one of the most controversial topics in plant biology (Durner and Klessig, 1999; Wendehenne et al., 2001; del Río et al., 2004; Zeier et al., 2004; Lamotte et al., 2005; Meyer et al., 2005; Modolo et al., 2005; Crawford, 2006; Crawford et al., 2006; Zemojtel et al., 2006a). Despite the controversy about its biosynthesis, it is now clear that NO regulates many physiological processes of plants, including seed germination, cell death, defense responses against pathogens, stomata function, senescence, and flowering (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Pedroso et al., 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Lamattina et al., 2003; He et al., 2004; Romero-Puertas et al., 2004; Wendehenne et al., 2004; Delledonne, 2005; Guo and Crawford, 2005; Simpson, 2005; Grün et al., 2006; Melotto et al., 2006; Planchet et al., 2006; Ali et al., 2007; Mishina et al., 2007).The molecular mechanisms underlying the control of seed dormancy and germination are still poorly characterized. Genetic data support a central role of abscisic acid (ABA) in regulating seed dormancy, whereas gibberellins promote germination (Finkelstein et al., 2008; Holdsworth et al., 2008). In addition, NO has been lately characterized as a new component in the signaling pathway leading to dormancy breakage. NO-releasing compounds reduce dormancy in a NO-dependent manner in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), some warm-season grasses, and certain barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars (Bethke et al., 2004; Sarath et al., 2006). More recently, the aleurone layer cells have been characterized as responsive to NO, gibberellins, and ABA, thus becoming a primary determinant of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis (Bethke et al., 2007).Two main enzyme-based pathways have been proposed to be functional for NO biosynthesis in plants. One is based on the activity of nitrate reductases (Meyer et al., 2005; Modolo et al., 2005), and another one, yet undefined, is based on the direct or indirect function of the Nitric Oxide-Associated1/Resistant to Inhibition by Fosfidomycin1 (AtNOA1/RIF1) protein. It has been also reported that NO synthesis from nitrite occurs in mitochondria associated with mitochondrial electron transport (Planchet et al., 2005) and also that this pathway is mainly functioning in roots under anoxia (Gupta et al., 2005). Moreover, the balance between mitochondrial nitrite reduction and superoxide-dependent NO degradation seems to be derived from factors controlling NO levels in Arabidopsis (Wulff et al., 2009). It has been recently reported that the synthesis of NO in floral organs requires nitrate reductase activity (Seligman et al., 2008) and also that homologues of AtNOA1 participate in NO biosynthesis in diatoms (Vardi et al., 2008), mammals (Zemojtel et al., 2006b; Parihar et al., 2008a, 2008b), and Nicotiana benthamiana (Kato et al., 2008). Recently, the identification of the rif1 mutant, carrying a null mutation in the AtNOA1 locus (At3g47450), allowed uncovering of a function for AtNOA1/RIF1 in the expression of plastome-encoded proteins (Flores-Pérez et al., 2008). Moreover, another recent report claims that AtNOA1 is not a NO synthase but a cGTPase (Moreau et al., 2008), likely playing a role in ribosome assembly and subsequent mRNA translation to proteins in the chloroplasts.To date, it is not clear if both pathways coexist in plants and, if so, the corresponding contributions of each pathway to NO biosynthesis. In this work, we have addressed the functions of both pathways in Arabidopsis by generating a triple mutant in both nitrate reductases and AtNOA1 that is severely impaired in NO production. Further characterization of NO-deficient plants allowed us to identify a functional cross talk between NO and ABA in controlling seed germination and dormancy as well as plant resistance to water deficit.     

Decreased Mitochondrial Activities of Malate Dehydrogenase and Fumarase in Tomato Lead to Altered Root Growth and Architecture via Diverse Mechanisms

Transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants in which either mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase or fumarase was antisense inhibited have previously been characterized to exhibit altered photosynthetic metabolism. Here, we demonstrate that these manipulations also resulted in differences in root growth, with both transgenics being characterized by a dramatic reduction of root dry matter deposition and respiratory activity but opposite changes with respect to root area. A range of physiological, molecular, and biochemical experiments were carried out in order to determine whether changes in root morphology were due to altered metabolism within the root itself, alterations in the nature of the transformants'' root exudation, consequences of alteration in the efficiency of photoassimilate delivery to the root, or a combination of these factors. Grafting experiments in which the transformants were reciprocally grafted to wild-type controls suggested that root length and area were determined by the aerial part of the plant but that biomass was not. Despite the transgenic roots displaying alteration in the expression of phytohormone-associated genes, evaluation of the levels of the hormones themselves revealed that, with the exception of gibberellins, they were largely unaltered. When taken together, these combined experiments suggest that root biomass and growth are retarded by root-specific alterations in metabolism and gibberellin contents. These data are discussed in the context of current models of root growth and biomass partitioning.The structure of the plant tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle has been established for decades (Beevers, 1961), and in vitro studies have established regulatory properties of many of its component enzymes (Budde and Randall, 1990; Millar and Leaver, 2000; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2005). That said, relatively little is known, as yet, regarding how this important pathway is regulated in vivo (Fernie et al., 2004a; Sweetlove et al., 2007). Indeed, even fundamental questions concerning the degree to which this pathway operates in illuminated leaves (Tcherkez et al., 2005; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007a) and the influence it has on organic acid levels in fruits (Burger et al., 2003) remain contentious. Furthermore, in contrast to many other pathways of primary metabolism, the TCA cycle has been subjected to relatively few molecular physiological studies. To date, the functions of pyruvate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, aconitase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, succinyl-CoA ligase, fumarase, and malate dehydrogenase have been studied via this approach (Landschütze et al., 1995; Carrari et al., 2003; Yui et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a; Lemaitre et al., 2007; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007); however, several of these studies were relatively cursory. Despite this fact, they generally corroborate one another, with at least two studies providing clear evidence for an important role of the TCA cycle in flower development (Landschütze et al., 1995; Yui et al., 2003) or in the coordination of photosynthetic and respiratory metabolisms of the illuminated leaf (Carrari et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a).In our own studies on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), we have observed that modulation of fumarase and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activities leads to contrasting shoot phenotypes, with the former displaying stunted growth while the later exhibited an enhanced photosynthetic performance (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a). We were able to demonstrate that the stunted-growth phenotype observed in aerial parts of the fumarase plants was a consequence of altered stomatal function (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007a), whereas the increased photosynthetic performance of the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase seems likely to be mediated by the alterations in ascorbate metabolism exhibited by these plants (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005; Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2006). In keeping with the altered rates of photosynthesis in these antisense plants, the fruit yield of fumarase and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase plants was decreased and increased, respectively. However, the root biomass of both transgenics was significantly reduced (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a). These observations were somewhat surprising given that it is estimated that 30% to 60% of net photosynthate is transported to root organs (Merckx et al., 1986; Nguyen et al., 1999; Singer et al., 2003). When taken together, these results suggest that the root phenotype must result from either an impairment of translocation or a root-specific effect. Neither of these explanations is without precedence, with inhibition of the expression of Suc transporters (Riesmeier et al., 1993; Gottwald et al., 2000) resulting in dramatically impaired root growth while organic acid exudation itself has been implicated in a wide range of root organ functions, including nutrient acquisition (de la Fuente et al., 1997; Imas et al., 1997; Neumann and Römheld, 1999; López-Bucio et al., 2000; Anoop et al., 2003; Delhaize et al., 2004), metal sequestration (Gillooly et al., 1983; de la Fuente et al., 1997; Cramer and Titus, 2001), and microbial proliferation in the rhizosphere (Lugtenberg et al., 1999; Weisskopf et al., 2005). In addition to the putative mechanisms listed above, the TCA cycle could be anticipated to play a vital role in meeting the high energy demands of nitrogen fixation and polymer biosynthesis associated with rapidly growing heterotrophic organs (Pradet and Raymond, 1983; Dieuaide-Noubhani et al., 1997; Stasolla et al., 2003; Deuschle et al., 2006). In keeping with this theory, alteration of the energy status of roots and other heterotrophic tissue has been documented to positively correlate with elevated biomass production (Anekonda, 2001; Regierer et al., 2002; Carrari et al., 2003; Lovas et al., 2003; Geigenberger et al., 2005). Here, we performed a detailed physiological, molecular, and biochemical evaluation of whole plant and root metabolism of the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase and fumarate antisense tomato lines. In this manner, we broadly assessed biochemical changes in the root, including the levels of several major phytohormones, as well as dissected which characteristics were influenced by aerial parts of the plant. The results obtained are discussed both with respect to the regulation of the TCA cycle per se and within the context of the determination of root morphology and growth.     

Extracellular DNA Is Required for Root Tip Resistance to Fungal Infection

Plant defense involves a complex array of biochemical interactions, many of which occur in the extracellular environment. The apical 1- to 2-mm root tip housing apical and root cap meristems is resistant to infection by most pathogens, so growth and gravity sensing often proceed normally even when other sites on the root are invaded. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown but appears to involve a mucilaginous matrix or “slime” composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and detached living cells called “border cells.” Here, we report that extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a component of root cap slime and that exDNA degradation during inoculation by a fungal pathogen results in loss of root tip resistance to infection. Most root tips (>95%) escape infection even when immersed in inoculum from the root-rotting pathogen Nectria haematococca. By contrast, 100% of inoculated root tips treated with DNase I developed necrosis. Treatment with BAL31, an exonuclease that digests DNA more slowly than DNase I, also resulted in increased root tip infection, but the onset of infection was delayed. Control root tips or fungal spores treated with nuclease alone exhibited normal morphology and growth. Pea (Pisum sativum) root tips incubated with [³²P]dCTP during a 1-h period when no cell death occurs yielded root cap slime containing ³²P-labeled exDNA. Our results suggest that exDNA is a previously unrecognized component of plant defense, an observation that is in accordance with the recent discovery that exDNA from white blood cells plays a key role in the vertebrate immune response against microbial pathogens.Root diseases caused by soil-borne plant pathogens are a perennial source of crop loss worldwide (Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986). These diseases are of increasing concern, as pesticides like methyl bromide are removed from the market due to environmental concerns (Gilreath et al., 2005). One possible alternative means of crop protection is to exploit natural mechanisms of root disease resistance (Nelson, 1990; Goswami and Punja, 2008; Shittu et al., 2009). Direct observation of root systems under diverse conditions has revealed that root tips, in general, are resistant to infection even when lesions are initiated elsewhere on the same plant root (Foster et al., 1983; Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986; Smith et al., 1992; Gunawardena et al., 2005; Wen et al., 2007). This form of disease resistance is important for crop production because root growth and its directional movement in response to gravity, water, and other signals can proceed normally as long as the root tip is not invaded. The 1- to 2-mm apical region of roots houses the root meristems required for root growth and cap development, and when infection does occur, root development ceases irreversibly within a few hours even in the absence of severe necrosis (Gunawardena and Hawes, 2002). Mechanisms underlying root tip resistance to infection are unclear, but the phenomenon appears to involve root cap “slime,” a mucilaginous matrix produced by the root cap (Morré et al., 1967; Rougier et al., 1979; Foster, 1982; Chaboud, 1983; Guinel and McCully, 1986; Moody et al., 1988; Knee et al., 2001; Barlow, 2003; Iijima et al., 2008). Within the root cap slime of cereals, legumes, and most other crop species are specialized populations of living cells called root “border cells” (Supplemental Fig. S1; Hawes et al., 2000). Border cell numbers increase in response to pathogens and toxins such as aluminum, and the cell populations maintain a high rate of metabolic activity even after detachment from the root cap periphery (Brigham et al., 1995; Miyasaka and Hawes, 2000).As border cells detach from roots of cereals and legumes, a complex of more than 100 proteins, termed the root cap secretome, is synthesized and exported from living cells into the matrix ensheathing the root tip (Brigham et al., 1995). The profile of secreted proteins changes in response to challenge with soil-borne bacteria (De-la-Peña et al., 2008). In pea (Pisum sativum), root tip resistance to infection is abolished in response to proteolytic degradation of the root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). In addition to an array of antimicrobial enzymes and other proteins known to be components of the extracellular matrix and apoplast of higher plants, the DNA-binding protein histone H4 unexpectedly was found to be present among the secreted proteins (Wen et al., 2007). One explanation for the presence of histone is global leakage of material from disrupted nuclei in dead cells, but no cell death occurs during delivery of the secretome (Brigham et al., 1995; Wen et al., 2007). An alternative explanation for the presence of a secreted DNA-binding protein is that extracellular DNA (exDNA) also is present in root cap slime.exDNA has long been known to be a component of slimy biological matrices ranging from purulent localized human infections to bacterial capsules, biofilms, and snail exudate (Sherry and Goeller, 1950; Leuchtenberger and Schrader, 1952; Braun and Whallon, 1954; Smithies and Gibbons, 1955; Catlin, 1956; Fahy et al., 1993; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006; Spoering and Gilmore, 2006; Qin et al., 2007; Izano et al., 2008). Specialized white blood cells in humans and other species including fish recently have been shown to deploy a complex neutrophil extracellular “trap” (NET), composed of DNA and a collection of enzymes, in response to infection (Brinkmann et al., 2004; Brinkmann and Zychlinsky, 2007; Palić et al., 2007; Wartha et al., 2007; Yousefi et al., 2008). NETs appear to kill bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens by localizing them within a matrix of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (Urban et al., 2006; Wartha et al., 2007; Guimaraes-Costa et al., 2009). Several extracellular peptides and proteins implicated in neutrophil function, including histone, also are present within the pea root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). exDNA linked with extracellular histone is a structural component of NETs, and treatment with DNase destroys NET integrity and function (Wartha et al., 2007). Moreover, human pathogens including group A Streptococcus and Streptococcus pneumoniae release extracellular DNase (Sherry and Goeller, 1950). When these activities are eliminated by mutagenesis of the encoding genes, bacteria lose their normal ability to escape the NET and multiply at the site of infection (Sumby et al., 2005; Buchanan et al., 2006). Here, we report that, in addition to histone and other secretome proteins, exDNA also is a component of root cap slime. When this exDNA is digested enzymatically, root tip resistance to infection is abolished.     

Hunting for Plant Nitric Oxide Synthase Provides New Evidence of a Central Role for Plastids in Nitric Oxide Metabolism

Nitric oxide (NO) has emerged as a central signaling molecule in plants and animals. However, the long search for a plant NO synthase (NOS) enzyme has only encountered false leads. The first works describing a pathogen-induced NOS-like plant protein were soon retracted. New hope came from the identification of NOS1, an Arabidopsis thaliana protein with an atypical NOS activity that was found to be targeted to mitochondria in roots. Although concerns about the NO-producing activity of this protein were raised (causing the renaming of the protein to NO-associated 1), compelling data on its biological role were missing until recently. Strong evidence is now available that this protein functions as a GTPase that is actually targeted to plastids, where it might be required for ribosome function. These and other results support the argument that the defective NO production in loss-of-function mutants is an indirect effect of interfering with normal plastid functions and that plastids play an important role in regulating NO levels in plant cells.A major revolution in biology took place by the early 1990s after the discovery that nitric oxide (NO), a free radical, was not a toxic by-product of oxidative metabolism but had a fundamental role as a signaling molecule regulating normal physiological processes in animal cells (Culotta and Koshland, 1992). A role of this volatile molecule in plant defense responses was subsequently reported, and it is now well established that NO is also a key player in the regulation of different plant developmental processes, including germination, root growth, vascular differentiation, stomatal closure, and flowering (Lamattina et al., 2003; Wendehenne et al., 2004; Crawford and Guo, 2005). Animal cells synthesize NO primarily by the activity of NO synthase (NOS) enzymes. There are several NOS isoforms, but all of them catalyze the same basic reaction: a NADPH-dependent oxidation of l-Arg to NO and l-citrulline. By contrast, the synthesis of NO in plant cells remains a matter of debate. The first reported mechanism to make NO in plants was the reduction of nitrite to NO catalyzed (with low efficiency) by nitrate reductase (NR), a cytosolic enzyme that normally reduces nitrate to nitrite (Yamasaki et al., 1999). But the contribution of NR to NO synthesis is still controversial.The analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana nia1 nia2 double mutant, which shows substantially reduced NR activity levels, has shown that such activity is required for NO synthesis during flowering (Seligman et al., 2008), auxin-induced lateral root development (Kolbert et al., 2008), and abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Bright et al., 2006) but not during infection (Zhang et al., 2003), salicylic acid treatment (Zottini et al., 2007), or mechanical stress (Garces et al., 2001). Furthermore, foliar extracts of the mutant show the same capacity to produce NO as wild-type plants when nitrite is exogenously supplied (Modolo et al., 2005). These results indicate that additional mechanisms to reduce nitrite into NO exist in plant cells and that the decreased capability for NO synthesis of mutant plants with defective NR activity might result from their reduced nitrite levels (Modolo et al., 2005). Other enzymatic sources for nitrite-dependent NO synthesis exist in the plasma membrane (Stohr et al., 2001) and mitochondria (Planchet et al., 2005), whereas nonenzymatic production of NO from nitrite has been shown to occur in acidic and reducing environments, such as the apoplasm (Bethke et al., 2004) and plastids (Cooney et al., 1994). The highly reduced levels of l-Arg in the nia1 nia2 mutant (Modolo et al., 2006) might also compromise its ability to produce NO. This amino acid is a substrate for the production of polyamines, compounds that have been proposed to participate in NO synthesis (Tun et al., 2006). Additionally, plants have been found to synthesize NO by an Arg-dependent NOS activity similar to that present in animal cells, as detailed in the next section.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.