Interaction of p190RhoGAP with C-terminal Domain of p120-catenin Modulates Endothelial Cytoskeleton and Permeability

p120-catenin is a multidomain intracellular protein, which mediates a number of cellular functions, including stabilization of cell-cell transmembrane cadherin complexes as well as regulation of actin dynamics associated with barrier function, lamellipodia formation, and cell migration via modulation of the activities of small GTPAses. One mechanism involves p120 catenin interaction with Rho GTPase activating protein (p190RhoGAP), leading to p190RhoGAP recruitment to cell periphery and local inhibition of Rho activity. In this study, we have identified a stretch of 23 amino acids within the C-terminal domain of p120 catenin as the minimal sequence responsible for the recruitment of p190RhoGAP (herein referred to as CRAD; catenin-RhoGAP association domain). Expression of the p120-catenin truncated mutant lacking the CRAD in endothelial cells attenuated effects of barrier protective oxidized phospholipid, OxPAPC. This effect was accompanied by inhibition of membrane translocation of p190RhoGAP, increased Rho signaling, as well as suppressed activation of Rac1 and its cytoskeletal effectors PAK1 (p21-activated kinase 1) and cortactin. Expression of p120 catenin-truncated mutant lacking CRAD also delayed the recovery process after thrombin-induced endothelial barrier disruption. Concomitantly, RhoA activation and downstream signaling were sustained for a longer period of time, whereas Rac signaling was inhibited. These data demonstrate a critical role for p120-catenin (amino acids 820–843) domain in the p120-catenin·p190RhoGAP signaling complex assembly, membrane targeting, and stimulation of p190RhoGAP activity toward inhibition of the Rho pathway and reciprocal up-regulation of Rac signaling critical for endothelial barrier regulation.     

Phosphorylation of the Cool-1/β-Pix Protein Serves as a Regulatory Signal for the Migration and Invasive Activity of Src-transformed Cells

Previously we showed that Cool-1 (Cloned out of library-1)/β-Pix (Pak-interactive exchange factor) is phosphorylated at a specific tyrosine residue (Tyr-442) in a Src-dependent manner and serves as a dual function guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF)/signaling-effector for Cdc42 that is essential for transformation by Src. Here, we show that knocking-down Cool-1 or overexpressing a Cool-1 mutant that contains substitutions within its Dbl homology domain and is defective for GEF activity, inhibits Src-promoted cell migration. Similarly, the expression of a Cool-1 mutant containing a tyrosine to phenylalanine substitution at position 442, making it incapable of being phosphorylated in response to serum, epidermal growth factor (EGF), or Src, also causes a significant inhibition of the migration and invasive activity of cells expressing oncogenic Src. We further demonstrate that the phosphorylation of Cool-1 at Tyr-442 weakens its ability to bind to one of its primary interaction-partners, Cat-1 (Cool-associated tyrosine phosphosubstrate-1)/Git-1 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interactor-1), thus making Cat more accessible for binding to paxillin. This enables cells to alternate between states where they contain large numbers of focal complexes (i.e. conditions favoring Cool-1-Cat interactions) versus reduced numbers of focal complexes (conditions favoring Cat-paxillin interactions). Overall, these findings show that the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle of Cool-1 at Tyr-442 can serve as a key regulatory signal for focal complex assembly-disassembly, and consequently, for the migration and invasive activity of Src-transformed cells.     

Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor αPIX Leads to Activation of the Rac 1 GTPase/Glycogen Phosphorylase Pathway in Interleukin (IL)-2-stimulated T Cells

Recently, we have reported that the active form of Rac 1 GTPase binds to the glycogen phosphorylase muscle isoform (PYGM) and modulates its enzymatic activity leading to T cell proliferation. In the lymphoid system, Rac 1 and in general other small GTPases of the Rho family participate in the signaling cascades that are activated after engagement of the T cell antigen receptor. However, little is known about the IL-2-dependent Rac 1 activator molecules. For the first time, a signaling pathway leading to the activation of Rac 1/PYGM in response to IL-2-stimulated T cell proliferation is described. More specifically, αPIX, a known guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPases of the Rho family, preferentially Rac 1, mediates PYGM activation in Kit 225 T cells stimulated with IL-2. Using directed mutagenesis, phosphorylation of αPIX Rho-GEF serines 225 and 488 is required for activation of the Rac 1/PYGM pathway. IL-2-stimulated serine phosphorylation was corroborated in Kit 225 T cells cultures. A parallel pharmacological and genetic approach identified PKCθ as the serine/threonine kinase responsible for αPIX serine phosphorylation. The phosphorylated state of αPIX was required to activate first Rac 1 and subsequently PYGM. These results demonstrate that the IL-2 receptor activation, among other early events, leads to activation of PKCθ. To activate Rac 1 and consequently PYGM, PKCθ phosphorylates αPIX in T cells. The biological significance of this PKCθ/αPIX/Rac 1 GTPase/PYGM signaling pathway seems to be the control of different cellular responses such as migration and proliferation.     

Attenuation of T Cell Receptor Signaling by Serine Phosphorylation-mediated Lysine 30 Ubiquitination of SLP-76 Protein

SLP-76 (SH2 domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kDa) is an adaptor protein that is essential for T cell development and T cell receptor (TCR) signaling activation. Previous studies have identified an important negative feedback regulation of SLP-76 by HPK1 (hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1; MAP4K1)-induced Ser-376 phosphorylation. Ser-376 phosphorylation of SLP-76 mediates 14-3-3 binding, resulting in the attenuation of SLP-76 activation and downstream signaling; however, the underlying mechanism of this action remains unknown. Here, we report that phosphorylated SLP-76 is ubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation during TCR signaling. SLP-76 ubiquitination is mediated by Ser-376 phosphorylation. Furthermore, Lys-30 is identified as a ubiquitination site of SLP-76. Loss of Lys-30 ubiquitination of SLP-76 results in enhanced anti-CD3 antibody-induced ERK and JNK activation. These results reveal a novel regulation mechanism of SLP-76 by ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of activated SLP-76, which is mediated by Ser-376 phosphorylation, leading to down-regulation of TCR signaling.     

Arf GTPase-activating proteins and their potential role in cell migration and invasion

Cell migration is central to normal physiology in embryogenesis, the inflammatory response and wound healing. In addition, the acquisition of a motile and invasive phenotype is an important step in the development of tumors and metastasis. Arf GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are nonredundant regulators of specialized membrane surfaces implicated in cell migration. Part of Arf GAP function is mediated by regulating the ADP ribosylation factor (Arf) family GTP-binding proteins. However, Arf GAPs can also function independently of their GAP enzymatic activity, in some cases working as Arf effectors. In this commentary, we discuss examples of Arf GAPs that function either as regulators of Arfs or independently of the GTPase activity to regulate membrane structures that mediate cell adhesion and movement.Key words: Arf GAP, Arf, effector, ADP-ribosylation factor, GTPase-activating protein, focal adhesions, podosomes, invadopodia, cell migrationCell migration involves adhesive structures in which the cell membrane is integrated with the actin cytoskeleton.¹ Cells acquire a spatial asymmetry to enable them to turn intracellular generated forces into a net cell body translocation. With the asymmetry, there is a clear distinction between the cell front and rear. Active membrane processes, including lamellipodia and filopodia, take place primarily around the cell front. Extension of both filopodia and lamellipodia is coupled with local actin polymerization, which generates protrusive force. In some cells, focal complexes form at the leading edge of lamellipodia and filopodia. Focal complexes are specialized surfaces of the plasma membrane that mediate attachment to the substratum, providing traction and allowing the cell edge to protrude. Focal complexes mature with cell migration to form another specialized surface in the plasma membrane, focal adhesions (FAs). FAs localize to the termini of stress fiber bundles and serve in longer-term anchorage at the rear of the cell.² A contractile force is generated at the rear of the cell by the myosin motors to move the cell forward and cell-substratum (extracellular matrix) attachments are released to retract the cell rear. In some cells, podosomes are adhesive structures that mediate cell migration and sometimes invasion.The structures involved in cell migration that are affected by Arf GAPs are FAs, podosomes and invadopodia. FAs contain multiple proteins, including integrins, which are transmembrane proteins.³ The extracellular part of integrins binds to the extracellular matrix. The cytoplasmic domains of integrins associate with multiple signaling proteins as well as proteins that are part of the actin cytoskeleton, thereby coordinating signaling events involved in cell migration and linking the extracellular matrix to the cytoskeleton. Cytoplasmic proteins critical to the function of FAs and that are often used as markers of FAs include vinculin, paxillin and focal adhesion kinase. At least five distinct Arf GAPs have been found to associate with FAs, including GIT1, GIT2, ASAP1, ASAP3 and ARAP2.⁴Podosomes and invadopodia are related structures induced by action of Src (reviewed in ref. ⁵). They contain some proteins in common with FAs, but do have some differences that likely reflect different function and/or regulation. For example, podosomes contain ASAP1 but not ASAP3.⁶ Podosomes and invadopodia have not been examined for the presence of other Arf GAPs. Like FAs, podosomes and invadopodia mediate adhesion to extracellular surfaces. In addition, they are points of degradation of the extracellular matrix and may transfer tension along the extracellular matrix to enable the cell to move. Consistent with the function in motility, podosomes and invadopodia are dynamic structures, turning over in minutes. Podosomes are found in normal physiology of cells including smooth muscle cells, osteoclasts and macrophages and in Src-transformed fibroblasts. Invadopodia are observed in transformed cells, such as cells derived from breast cancers.Two families of GTP-binding proteins within the Ras superfamily, Rho and Arf, are involved in both actin and membrane remodeling. RhoA regulates stress fibers (bundles of actin filaments that traverse the cell and are linked to the extracellular matrix through FAs) and the assembly of FAs.⁷ Rac1 regulates membrane ruffling and lamellipodia formation.⁸ Cdc42 regulates filopodia formation.⁹ Activation of Cdc42 has been shown to lead to the sequential activation of Rac1 and then RhoA in growth factor stimulated fibroblasts.Arf proteins regulate membrane traffic and the actin cytoskeleton.¹⁰ There are six mammalian Arf proteins, divided into three classes based on their amino-acid sequence. Arf12 and 3 are class I, Arf4 and Arf5 are class II and Arf6 is the single member of the class III group. Arf1 and Arf6 have been the most extensively studied. Most work has focused on Arf1 function in the Golgi apparatus and endocytic compartments although Arf1 has been found to affect paxillin recruitment to FAs and trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptor from the plasma membrane. Arf6 affects the endocytic pathway and the peripheral actin cytoskeleton.The function of Rho and Arf family proteins depends on a cycle of binding and hydrolyzing GTP. However, Rho and Arf family proteins have slow intrinsic nucleotide exchange. Rho family proteins have slow intrinsic GTPase activity and Arf family proteins have no detectable intrinsic GTPase activity. The cycle of GTP binding and hydrolysis is driven by accessory proteins called guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs). Rho family proteins are also regulated by guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors, which prevent spontaneous activation in the cytoplasm.Arf GAPs are enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Arf proteins, thereby converting Arf•GTP to Arf•GDP. Thirty-one genes in human encode proteins with Arf GAP domains (Fig. 1). The Arf GAP family is divided into ten subgroups based on domain structure and phylogenetic analysis.¹¹ Six subgroups contain the Arf GAP domain at the N-terminus of the protein. Four groups contain a tandem of a PH, Arf GAP and Ankyrin repeat domains. The Arf GAP nomenclature is mostly based on the protein domain structure. For instance, the ASAP first identified, ASAP1, contains Arf GAP, SH3, Ank repeat and PH domains; ARAPs contain Arf GAP, Rho GAP, Ank repeat and PH domains; ACAPs contain Arf GAP, coiled-coil (later identified as BAR domain), Ank repeat and PH domains; and AGAPs contain Arf GAP, GTP-binding protein-like, Ank repeat and PH domains.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain structure of the Arf GAP family. The schematic representation of the ten groups of proteins containing the Arf GAP domain is not drawn to scale. Abbreviations used are: ALPS, ArfGAP1 lipid-packing sensor domain; Ank, Ankyrin repeats; Arf GAP, Arf GTPase activating domain; BAR, Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs domain; CALM, CALM binding domain; CB, clathrin box; CC, coiled-coiled domain; FG repeats, multiple copies of the XXFG motif; GLD, GTP-binding protein-like domain; PBS, paxillin binding site; PH, pleckstrin homology domain; Pro (PxxP)₃, cluster of three proline-rich (PxxP) motifs; Pro (D/ELPPKP)₈, eigth tandem Prolin-rich (D/ELPPKP) motifs; RA, Ras association motif; Rho GAP, Rho GTPase activating domain; SAM, sterile α-motif; SH3, Src homology 3 domain; SHD, Spa homology domain. *ASAP2 and ASAP3 lack the Pro (D/ELPPKP)₈ motifs. ASAP3 has no SH3 domain. ^&AGAP2 has a splice variant with three N-terminal PxxP motifs, called PIKE-L. @ARAP2 has an inactive Rho GAP domain.The subcellular localization and function of a number of Arf GAPs have been identified. Arf GAP1, Arf GAP2 and Arf GAP3 are found in the Golgi apparatus where they control membrane traffic by regulating Arf1•GTP levels.^12,13 Arf GAP1 has also been proposed to directly contribute to the formation of transport intermediates.¹⁴ SMAPs and AGAP1 and AGAP2 are associated with endosomes and regulate endocytic trafficking.^14,15 ASAPs, ARAPs and Gits are associated with FAs. ASAPs, ARAPs and ACAPs are found in actin-rich membrane ruffles. ASAP1 is also found in invadopodia and podosomes.⁴ We propose that common to all Arf GAPs is that they laterally organize membranes, which maintain surfaces of specialized functions such as FAs and podosomes/invadopodia. Some Arf GAPs function primarily as Arf effectors with the turnover rate of the specialized membrane surface being determined by the catalytic rate of the GAP. Other Arf GAPs function as Arf regulators that integrate several signals.ASAP1 is an example of an Arf GAP that may function as an Arf effector to regulate podosomes and invadopodia. ASAP1 is encoded by a gene on the short arm of chromosome 8. The gene is amplified in aggressive forms of uveal melanoma and cell migration rates correlate with ASAP1 expression levels in uveal melanoma¹⁶ and other cell types. ASAP1 function depends on cycling among four cellular locations, cytosol, FAs, lamellipodia and podosomes/invadopodia. ASAP1 is necessary for the formation of podosomes/invadopodia.^17,18The structural features of ASAP1 that are required to support podosome formation have been examined.^17,18 ASAP1 contains, from the N-terminus, BAR, PH, Arf GAP, Ank repeat, proline rich and SH3 domains (Fig. 2A).¹⁹ There are two major isoforms, ASAP1a and ASAP1b that differ in the proline rich domain. ASAP1a contains three SH3 binding motifs within the proline rich region including an atypical SH3 binding motif with 6 consecutive prolines. The atypical SH3 binding motif is absent in ASAP1b (Fig. 2A). ASAP1 also has a highly conserved tyrosine between the Ank repeat and proline rich domains that is a site of phosphorylation by the oncogene Src.¹⁸Open in a separate windowFigure 2ASAP1 function in podosome and invadopodia formation. (A) Domain structure of ASAP1 splice variants. ASAP1a contains three proline-rich motifs, P1, P2 and P3. P1 and P3 contain a typical (PxxP) motif. P2 contains six prolines. ASAP1b contains only P1 and P3. (B) Model of ASAP1 functioning as an Arf effector to regulate podosome and invadopodia formation. ASAP1 integrates signals from Src, PIP₂ and Arf•GTP. For abbreviations of the domain structure of ASAP1 see Figure 1. Other abbreviations: PIP₂, phosphoinositides 4,5-biphosphate; Arf1, ADP-ribosylation factor 1.The BAR domain is a bundle of 3 α-helices that homodimerizes to form a boomerang-shaped structure.^20,21 BAR domains sense or induce membrane curvature.²⁰ ASAP1 has been found to induce curvature dependent on its BAR domain.²² BAR domains are also protein binding sites.²¹ The BAR domain of ASAP1 binds to FIP3, a Rab11 and Arf6 binding proteins.²³ Arf6-dependent targeting of ASAP1 is likely mediated by FIP3.²³ Deletion of or introduction of point mutations into the BAR domain render ASAP1 inactive in supporting podosome formation. The relative role of membrane tubulation and protein binding in mediating the effect of the BAR domain on podosome formation has not been explored.The SH3 domain of ASAP1 binds to focal adhesion kinase²⁴ and pyk2.²⁵ Either deletion of or introduction of point mutations into the SH3 domain abrogates the ability of ASAP1 to support podosome formation.¹⁸ The molecular basis for the function of the SH3 domain in podosome formation is not known. The proline rich domain binds to Src¹⁹ and CrkL.²⁶ Whether it also binds to cortactin has not been resolved. Reports also conflict regarding the importance of the proline rich domain for podosomes/invadopodia formation.^17,18Three signals impinge on ASAP1 to drive podosome formation (Fig. 2B). A conserved tyrosine between the Ank and proline rich motifs is phosphorylated by Src.^18,25 Mutation of the tyrosine to phenylalanine results in a protein that functions as a dominant negative blocking podosome formation. ASAP1 with the tyrosine changed to glutamate can support podosome formation, but the mutant ASAP1 is not sufficient to drive podosome formation.¹⁸ Based on these results, phosphorylation of the conserved tyrosine is necessary but not sufficient to support podosome formation. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP₂) binds to the PH domain, which stimulates GAP activity in vitro.²⁷ ASAP1 with mutations in the PH domain that abrogate binding, does not support podosome formation (Jian, Bharti and Randazzo PA, unpublished observations). Point mutations in the PH domain affect both the K_m and the k_cat for GAP activity. The effect of mutating the PH domain on the ability of ASAP1 to support podosome formation may be consequent to changes in binding Arf1•GTP; it is not likely the result of loss of GAP activity. ASAP1 with a point mutation in the GAP domain that prevents GAP activity but not Arf1•GTP binding is able to support podosome formation whereas a point mutant of ASAP1 that cannot bind Arf1•GTP does not (Jian, Bharti and Randazzo PA, unpublished observations).¹⁸ These data support the idea that ASAP1 integrates three signals, (1) PIP₂, (2) Src and (3) Arf1•GTP. In response to the signals, ASAP1 functions as a scaffold and directly alters the lipid bilayer to create a domain within the plasma membrane that becomes a podosome. In this model, ASAP1 is functioning as an Arf effector and the GAP activity may regulate the turnover of podosomes.ASAP3, another ASAP-type protein, is found in FAs.⁶ Reducing ASAP3 expression also reduces cell migration and invasion of Arf GAPs in cell migration mammary carcinoma cells through matrigel. Although ASAP3 does not affect the ability to form FAs, it does affect stress fiber formation and may affect focal adhesion maturation (Ha, Chen and Randazzo PA, unpublished observations).⁶ The molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of ASAP3 on the cytoskeleton are being examined including the possibility that, like ASAP1, ASAP3 integrates several signals and functions as an Arf effector.ARAPs are examples of Arf GAP family proteins that function as Arf regulators. In common with ASAPs, they integrate a number of signaling pathways and affect the actin cytoskeleton. Three genes encode ARAPs in humans.¹¹ Each of the ARAPs is comprised of a SAM, five PH, Arf GAP, Rho GAP, Ank repeat and Ras association domains. Two of the five PH domains have the consensus sequence for binding to the signaling lipid phosphoinositide 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP₃); however, when examined for ARAP1, PIP₃ was not involved in membrane targeting (Campa F, Balla and Randazzo PA, unpublished observations).Examination of the role of ARAP2 in FA formation has provided information about the function of the GAP activity in the cellular function of an Arf GAP. ARAP2 selectively uses Arf6 as a substrate and, different from ARAP1 and ARAP3, has an inactive Rho GAP domain. The Rho GAP domain, however, retains the ability to selectively bind to RhoA•GTP. Also different from ARAP1 and ARAP3, ARAP2 associates with FAs. Cells with reduced expression of ARAP2, consequent to siRNA treatment, have fewer FAs and stress fibers and more focal complexes than control cells. The formation of FAs and stress fibers can be restored by expressing recombinant wild type ARAP2. A mutant of ARAP2 that lacks Arf GAP activity, while retaining the ability to bind to Arf6•GTP, cannot restore FA and stress fiber formation. Similarly, expression of a mutant of ARAP2 that is not able to bind RhoA•GTP cannot reverse the effect of reducing expression of endogenous ARAP2.²⁸ These results support the idea that ARAP2 functions as an Arf GAP that is an effector of RhoA.The model of ARAP2 functioning as a RhoA effector can explain the effects of ARAP2 on FAs (Fig. 3). Arf6•GTP is involved in the formation of Rac1•GTP.²⁹ Rac1•GTP drives lamellipodia and focal complex formation. The conversion of focal complexes to FAs is accompanied by an increase in RhoA•GTP and a decrease in Rac1•GTP. ARAP2 could function to mediate the reciprocal changes in RhoA and Rac1. RhoA•GTP formation leads to the activation of ARAP2. As a consequence of Arf6 GAP activity, Arf6•GTP is converted to Arf6•GDP. With reduced Arf6•GTP, Rac1•GTP concentration also decreases.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Model of ARAP2 as an Arf regulator that controls focal adhesion formation. In this model, ARAP2 functions as a RhoA effector. The inactive Rho GAP domain of ARAP2 binds to RhoA•GTP, which contributes to activation of Arf6 GAP activity. ARAP2 hydrolyzes its substrate Arf6•GTP into Arf6•GDP. Subsequent to Arf6•GTP hydrolysis, Rac1•GTP concentration decreases. For abbreviations of the domain structure of ARAP2 see Figure 1.The Arf GAP activity of other ARAPs may also be critical for cellular functions of the protein. Furthermore, the Rho GAP activity is slow for ARAP1 and ARAP3. It is possible that ARAP1 and ARAP3 can function as Rho effectors with an active Rho GAP domain analogously to ASAP1 functioning as an Arf effector. Further definition of the cellular function of ARAP1 and ARAP3 will provide opportunities to test this idea.We have provided two examples of Arf GAPs that affect cell adhesion and migration. In one case, the Arf GAP appears to function as an Arf effector. In the other case, the Arf GAP functions as a regulator of Arf. The difference in function was discerned using Arf GAP mutants. If functioning as an Arf effector, an Arf GAP mutant that can bind Arf•GTP but not induce hydrolysis can reverse the effect of reduced endogenous Arf GAP, whereas a mutant that cannot bind Arf•GTP cannot replace endogenous Arf GAP. When working as an Arf regulator, a mutant that can bind Arf•GTP but not induce GTP hydrolysis cannot replace endogenous Arf GAP. Whether functioning as an effector or regulator, the rate of GAP activity determines the turnover rate of a specialized membrane surface maintained by Arf.The Arf GAPs have specific sites of action within cells. Some contribute to malignancy, such as ASAP1, ASAP3, AGAP2 and SMAP1.³⁰ The molecular basis of cellular function of each Arf GAPs is distinct. Here, we describe one Arf GAP that functions as an Arf effector and another that functions as an Arf regulator. Each class of Arf GAP has distinct sets of protein binding partners. Furthermore, catalytic mechanism differs among the GAPs. Because of these differences, Arf GAPs may be useful therapeutic targets for cancer therapy.     

Src Kinase Determines the Dynamic Exchange of the Docking Protein NEDD9 (Neural Precursor Cell Expressed Developmentally Down-regulated Gene 9) at Focal Adhesions

Dynamic exchange of molecules between the cytoplasm and integrin-based focal adhesions provides a rapid response system for modulating cell adhesion. Increased residency time of molecules that regulate adhesion turnover contributes to adhesion stability, ultimately determining migration speed across two-dimensional surfaces. In the present study we test the role of Src kinase in regulating dynamic exchange of the focal adhesion protein NEDD9/HEF1/Cas-L. Using either chemical inhibition or fibroblasts genetically null for Src together with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we find that Src significantly reduces NEDD9 exchange at focal adhesions. Analysis of NEDD9 mutant constructs with the two major Src-interacting domains disabled revealed the greatest effects were due to the NEDD9 SH2 binding domain. This correlated with a significant change in two-dimensional migratory speed. Given the emerging role of NEDD9 as a regulator of focal adhesion stability, the time of NEDD9 association at the focal adhesions is key in modulating rates of migration and invasion. Our study suggests that Src kinase activity determines NEDD9 exchange at focal adhesions and may similarly modulate other focal adhesion-targeted Src substrates to regulate cell migration.     

The Recognition Unit of FIBCD1 Organizes into a Noncovalently Linked Tetrameric Structure and Uses a Hydrophobic Funnel (S1) for Acetyl Group Recognition

We have recently identified FIBCD1 (Fibrinogen C domain containing 1) as a type II transmembrane endocytic receptor located primarily in the intestinal brush border. The ectodomain of FIBCD1 comprises a coiled coil, a polycationic region, and a C-terminal FReD (fibrinogen-related domain) that assembles into disulfide-linked homotetramers. The FIBCD1-FReD binds Ca²⁺ dependently to acetylated structures like chitin, N-acetylated carbohydrates, and amino acids. FReDs are present in diverse innate immune pattern recognition proteins including the ficolins and horseshoe crab TL5A. Here, we use chemical cross-linking, combined with analytical ultracentrifugation and electron microscopy of the negatively stained recombinant FIBCD1-FReD to show that it assembles into noncovalent tetramers in the absence of the coiled coil. We use surface plasmon resonance, carbohydrate binding, and pulldown assays combined with site-directed mutagenesis to define the binding site involved in the interaction of FIBCD1 with acetylated structures. We show that mutations of central residues (A432V and H415G) in the hydrophobic funnel (S1) abolish the binding of FIBCD1 to acetylated bovine serum albumin and chitin. The double mutations (D393N/D395A) at the putative calcium-binding site reduce the ability of FIBCD1 to bind ligands. We conclude that the FReDs of FIBCD1 forms noncovalent tetramers and that the acetyl-binding site of FReDs of FIBCD1 is homologous to that of tachylectin 5A and M-ficolin but not to the FReD of L-ficolin. We suggest that the spatial organization of the FIBCD1-FReDs determine the molecular pattern recognition specificity and subsequent biological functions.     

Chemically Modified DNA Aptamers Bind Interleukin-6 with High Affinity and Inhibit Signaling by Blocking Its Interaction with Interleukin-6 Receptor

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates immune and inflammatory responses, and its overproduction is a hallmark of inflammatory diseases. Inhibition of IL-6 signaling with the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab has provided some clinical benefit to patients; however, direct cytokine inhibition may be a more effective option. We used the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) process to discover slow off-rate modified aptamers (SOMAmers) with hydrophobic base modifications that inhibit IL-6 signaling in vitro. Two classes of IL-6 SOMAmers were isolated from modified DNA libraries containing 40 random positions and either 5-(N-benzylcarboxamide)-2′-deoxyuridine (Bn-dU) or 5-[N-(1-naphthylmethyl)carboxamide]-2′-deoxyuridine (Nap-dU) replacing dT. These modifications facilitate the high affinity binding interaction with IL-6 and provide resistance against degradation by serum endonucleases. Post-SELEX optimization of one Bn-dU and one Nap-dU SOMAmer led to improvements in IL-6 binding (10-fold) and inhibition activity (greater than 20-fold), resulting in lead SOMAmers with sub-nanomolar affinity (K_d = 0.2 nm) and potency (IC₅₀ = 0.2 nm). Although similar in inhibition properties, the two SOMAmers have unique sequences and different ortholog specificities. Furthermore, these SOMAmers were stable in human serum in vitro for more than 48 h. Both SOMAmers prevented IL-6 signaling by blocking the interaction of IL-6 with its receptor and inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells in vitro as effectively as tocilizumab. This new class of IL-6 inhibitor may be an effective therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from inflammatory diseases.     

The Linker for Activation of B Cells (LAB)/Non-T Cell Activation Linker (NTAL) Regulates Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells (TREM)-2 Signaling and Macrophage Inflammatory Responses Independently of the Linker for Activation of T Cells

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM-2) is rapidly emerging as a key regulator of the innate immune response via its regulation of macrophage inflammatory responses. Here we demonstrate that proximal TREM-2 signaling parallels other DAP12-based receptor systems in its use of Syk and Src-family kinases. However, we find that the linker for activation of T cells (LAT) is severely reduced as monocytes differentiate into macrophages and that TREM-2 exclusively uses the linker for activation of B cells (LAB encoded by the gene Lat2^−/−) to mediate downstream signaling. LAB is required for TREM-2-mediated activation of Erk1/2 and dampens proximal TREM-2 signals through a novel LAT-independent mechanism resulting in macrophages with proinflammatory properties. Thus, Lat2^−/− macrophages have increased TREM-2-induced proximal phosphorylation, and lipopolysaccharide stimulation of these cells leads to increased interleukin-10 (IL-10) and decreased IL-12p40 production relative to wild type cells. Together these data identify LAB as a critical, LAT-independent regulator of TREM-2 signaling and macrophage development capable of controlling subsequent inflammatory responses.     

Involvement of SARA in Axon and Dendrite Growth

SARA (Smad Anchor for Receptor Activation) plays a crucial role in Rab5-mediated endocytosis in cell lines localizing to early endosomes where it regulates morphology and function. Here, we analyzed the role of SARA during neuronal development and tested whether it functions as a regulator of endocytic trafficking of selected axonal and membrane proteins. Suppression of SARA perturbs the appearance of juxtanuclear endocytic recycling compartments and the neurons show long axons with large growth cones. Furthermore, surface distribution of the cell adhesion molecule L1 in axons and the fusion of vesicles containing transferring receptor (TfR) in dendrites were increased in neurons where SARA was silenced. Conversely, SARA overexpression generated large early endosomes and reduced neurite outgrowth. Taken together, our findings suggest a significant contribution of SARA to key aspects of neuronal development, including neurite formation.     

Lack of CD47 Impairs Bone Cell Differentiation and Results in an Osteopenic Phenotype in Vivo due to Impaired Signal Regulatory Protein α (SIRPα) Signaling

Here, we investigated whether the cell surface glycoprotein CD47 was required for normal formation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and to maintain normal bone formation activity in vitro and in vivo. In parathyroid hormone or 1α,25(OH)₂-vitamin D3 (D3)-stimulated bone marrow cultures (BMC) from CD47^−/− mice, we found a strongly reduced formation of multinuclear tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)⁺ osteoclasts, associated with reduced expression of osteoclastogenic genes (nfatc1, Oscar, Trap/Acp, ctr, catK, and dc-stamp). The production of M-CSF and RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand) was reduced in CD47^−/− BMC, as compared with CD47^+/+ BMC. The stromal cell phenotype in CD47^−/− BMC involved a blunted expression of the osteoblast-associated genes osterix, Alp/Akp1, and α-1-collagen, and reduced mineral deposition, as compared with that in CD47^+/+ BMC. CD47 is a ligand for SIRPα (signal regulatory protein α), which showed strongly reduced tyrosine phosphorylation in CD47^−/− bone marrow stromal cells. In addition, stromal cells lacking the signaling SIRPα cytoplasmic domain also had a defect in osteogenic differentiation, and both CD47^−/− and non-signaling SIRPα mutant stromal cells showed a markedly reduced ability to support osteoclastogenesis in wild-type bone marrow macrophages, demonstrating that CD47-induced SIRPα signaling is critical for stromal cell support of osteoclast formation. In vivo, femoral bones of 18- or 28-week-old CD47^−/− mice showed significantly reduced osteoclast and osteoblast numbers and exhibited an osteopenic bone phenotype. In conclusion, lack of CD47 strongly impairs SIRPα-dependent osteoblast differentiation, deteriorate bone formation, and cause reduced formation of osteoclasts.     

Ankyrin Repeat Domain Protein 2 and Inhibitor of DNA Binding 3 Cooperatively Inhibit Myoblast Differentiation by Physical Interaction

Ankyrin repeat domain protein 2 (ANKRD2) translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm upon myogenic induction. Overexpression of ANKRD2 inhibits C2C12 myoblast differentiation. However, the mechanism by which ANKRD2 inhibits myoblast differentiation is unknown. We demonstrate that the primary myoblasts of mdm (muscular dystrophy with myositis) mice (pMB^mdm) overexpress ANKRD2 and ID3 (inhibitor of DNA binding 3) proteins and are unable to differentiate into myotubes upon myogenic induction. Although suppression of either ANKRD2 or ID3 induces myoblast differentiation in mdm mice, overexpression of ANKRD2 and inhibition of ID3 or vice versa is insufficient to inhibit myoblast differentiation in WT mice. We identified that ANKRD2 and ID3 cooperatively inhibit myoblast differentiation by physical interaction. Interestingly, although MyoD activates the Ankrd2 promoter in the skeletal muscles of wild-type mice, SREBP-1 (sterol regulatory element binding protein-1) activates the same promoter in the skeletal muscles of mdm mice, suggesting the differential regulation of Ankrd2. Overall, we uncovered a novel pathway in which SREBP-1/ANKRD2/ID3 activation inhibits myoblast differentiation, and we propose that this pathway acts as a critical determinant of the skeletal muscle developmental program.     

MicroRNA-433 Inhibits Liver Cancer Cell Migration by Repressing the Protein Expression and Function of cAMP Response Element-binding Protein

We show for the first time that potent microRNA-433 (miR-433) inhibition of expression of the cAMP response element-binding protein CREB1 represses hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell migration. We identified a miR-433 seed match region in human and mouse CREB1 3′-UTRs. Overexpression of miR-433 markedly decreased human CREB1 3′-UTR reporter activity, and the inhibitory effect of miR-433 was alleviated upon mutation of its binding site. Ectopic expression of miR-433 reduced CREB1 protein levels in a variety of human and mouse cancer cells, including HeLa, Hepa1, Huh7, and HepG2. Human CREB1 protein levels in highly invasive MHCC97H cells were diminished by expression of miR-433 but were induced by miR-433 antagomir (anti-miR-433). The expression of mouse CREB1 protein negatively correlated with miR-433 levels in nuclear receptor Shp^−/− liver tissues and liver tumors compared with wild-type mice. miR-433 exhibited a significant repression of MHCC97H cell migration, which was reversed by anti-miR-433. Overexpressing miR-433 inhibited focus formation dramatically, demonstrating that miR-433 may exert a tumor suppressor function. Knockdown of CREB1 by siRNAs impeded MHCC97H cell migration and invasion and antagonized the effect of anti-miR-433. Interestingly, CREB1 siRNA decreased MHCC97H cell proliferation, which was not influenced by anti-miR-433. Overexpressing CREB1 decreased the inhibitory activity of miR-433. The CpG islands surrounding miR-433 were hypermethylated, and the DNA methylation agent 5′-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, but not the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A, drastically stimulated the expression of miR-433 and miR-127 in HCC cells. The latter is clustered with miR-433. The results reveal a critical role of miR-433 in mediating HCC cell migration via CREB1.     

Amer2 Protein Interacts with EB1 Protein and Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) and Controls Microtubule Stability and Cell Migration

EB1 is key factor in the organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton by binding to the plus-ends of microtubules and serving as a platform for a number of interacting proteins (termed +TIPs) that control microtubule dynamics. Together with its direct binding partner adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), EB1 can stabilize microtubules. Here, we show that Amer2 (APC membrane recruitment 2), a previously identified membrane-associated APC-binding protein, is a direct interaction partner of EB1 and acts as regulator of microtubule stability together with EB1. Amer2 binds to EB1 via specific (S/T)xIP motifs and recruits it to the plasma membrane. Coexpression of Amer2 and EB1 generates stabilized microtubules at the plasma membrane, whereas knockdown of Amer2 leads to destabilization of microtubules. Knockdown of Amer2, APC, or EB1 reduces cell migration, and morpholino-mediated down-regulation of Xenopus Amer2 blocks convergent extension cell movements, suggesting that the Amer2-EB1-APC complex regulates cell migration by altering microtubule stability.     

Role for Heat Shock Protein 90α in the Proliferation and Migration of HaCaT Cells and in the Deep Second-Degree Burn Wound Healing in Mice

Inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling are essential steps for wound healing. The hypoxic wound microenvironment promotes cell migration through a hypoxia—heat shock protein 90 alpha (Hsp90α)—low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP-1) autocrine loop. To elucidate the role of this autocrine loop on burn wound healing, we investigated the expression profile of Hsp90α at the edge of burn wounds and found a transient increase in both mRNA and protein levels. Experiments performed with a human keratinocyte cell line—HaCaT also confirmed above results. 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17demethoxygeldanamycin hydrochloride (17-DMAG), an Hsp90α inhibitor, was used to further evaluate the function of Hsp90α in wound healing. Consistently, topical application of Hsp90α in the early stage of deep second-degree burn wounds led to reduced inflammation and increased tissue granulation, with a concomitant reduction in the size of the wound at each time point tested (p<0.05). Consequently, epidermal cells at the wound margin progressed more rapidly causing an expedited healing process. In conclusion, these results provided a rationale for the therapeutic effect of Hsp90α on the burn wound management.