Mutations That Increase DNA Binding by the Processivity Factor of Herpes Simplex Virus Affect Virus Production and DNA Replication Fidelity

The interactions of the herpes simplex virus processivity factor UL42 with the catalytic subunit of the viral polymerase (Pol) and DNA are critical for viral DNA replication. Previous studies, including one showing that substitution of glutamine residue 282 with arginine (Q282R) results in an increase of DNA binding in vitro, have indicated that the positively charged back surface of UL42 interacts with DNA. To investigate the biological consequences of increased DNA binding by UL42 mutations, we constructed two additional UL42 mutants, including one with a double substitution of alanine for aspartic acid residues (D270A/D271A) and a triple mutant with the D270A/D271A and Q282R substitutions. These UL42 mutants exhibited increased and prolonged DNA binding without an effect on binding to a peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol. Plasmids expressing any of the three UL42 mutants with an increased positive charge on the back surface of UL42 were qualitatively competent for complementation of growth and DNA replication of a UL42 null mutant on Vero cells. We then engineered viruses expressing these mutant proteins. The UL42 mutants were more resistant to detergent extraction than wild-type UL42, suggesting that they are more tightly associated with DNA in infected cells. All three UL42 mutants formed smaller plaques on Vero cells and replicated to reduced yields compared with results for a control virus expressing wild-type UL42. Moreover, mutants with double and triple mutations, which contain D270A/D271A mutations, exhibited increased mutation frequencies, and mutants containing the Q282R mutation exhibited elevated ratios of virion DNA copies per PFU. These results suggest that herpes simplex virus has evolved so that UL42 neither binds DNA too tightly nor too weakly to optimize virus production and replication fidelity.Processivity factors of DNA polymerases promote long-chain DNA synthesis by preventing dissociation of the DNA polymerase from the primer/template. Processivity factors also can influence DNA replication fidelity, as indicated by numerous in vivo and in vitro studies (1-3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 18, 28, 36). A major class of processivity factors known as “sliding clamps” includes proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) of eukaryotic cells (23) and gp45 of T4 bacteriophage (27). Sliding clamps are homodimers or homotrimers that encircle DNA and interact with the catalytic subunits (Pols) of their cognate DNA polymerases to promote processive DNA synthesis.A second class of processivity factors includes those encoded by herpesviruses and is exemplified by herpes simplex virus (HSV) UL42. UL42 forms a heterodimer with the HSV Pol. Both subunits are essential for production of infectious virus and for viral DNA replication (20, 26). UL42 can stimulate long-chain DNA synthesis by Pol, and template challenge experiments established that this stimulation is due to increased processivity (15). In addition to its interaction with Pol, which is mediated by the C terminus of Pol, UL42 also binds DNA directly with high affinity (14, 15, 30, 37). This mode of DNA binding differs from that of sliding clamps, which do not form high-affinity direct interactions with DNA (13) but must be loaded onto DNA with the aid of ATP-dependent clamp loaders for their normal functioning (16). Nevertheless, the structure of UL42 is very similar to a monomer of the sliding clamp PCNA (39). Like other processivity factors, UL42 also plays a role in maintaining DNA replication fidelity both in vivo and in vitro (5, 18).The “back face” (opposite face to the side that binds Pol) of a UL42 molecule contains several positively charged residues. By titrating the effects of cations on UL42 DNA binding, it was determined that charge-charge interactions are involved in the interaction (22). Substitutions of alanine for any of four arginine residues on the back face of UL42 resulted in substantial reductions in DNA binding without affecting the binding to peptide corresponding to the C terminus of Pol in vitro (31), while substitutions of lysine for arginine had little or no effect on DNA binding affinity (22). A UL42 mutant (Q282R) containing a substitution of arginine for a negatively charged glutamine residue on the back face of UL42 exhibited a fourfold increase in DNA binding without altering the interaction with the Pol C-terminal peptide in vitro (22). Therefore, the positively charged surface of UL42 is important for the interaction between UL42 and DNA. A question raised by these studies is whether UL42 could bind DNA so tightly as to affect HSV replication.Mutant viruses engineered to encode individual arginine-to-alanine substitution mutations in UL42 exhibit several phenotypes, including a delayed onset of viral DNA replication, reduced virus yields, and reduced fidelity of DNA replication (18). Recombinant viruses expressing UL42 with multiple substitutions of alanine for arginine residues exhibit even greater effects on viral DNA replication and virus yields (19). Thus, reducing DNA binding by UL42 deleteriously affects viral growth and DNA replication fidelity. However, these studies did not address whether increasing DNA binding by UL42 would have any effects on viral DNA replication, replication fidelity, or virus production.In this study we engineered two new UL42 mutant proteins (with the D270A/D271A or Q282R/D270A/D271A mutations) that contain less negative charge on the back face and examined the effects of these substitutions on DNA and Pol peptide binding. In addition, recombinant viruses were constructed to examine the effect of these multiple substitutions and the single Q282R substitution on virus production, DNA replication, and the fidelity of DNA replication.     

The Crystal Structure of PF-8, the DNA Polymerase Accessory Subunit from Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus

Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus is an emerging pathogen whose mechanism of replication is poorly understood. PF-8, the presumed processivity factor of Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus DNA polymerase, acts in combination with the catalytic subunit, Pol-8, to synthesize viral DNA. We have solved the crystal structure of residues 1 to 304 of PF-8 at a resolution of 2.8 Å. This structure reveals that each monomer of PF-8 shares a fold common to processivity factors. Like human cytomegalovirus UL44, PF-8 forms a head-to-head dimer in the form of a C clamp, with its concave face containing a number of basic residues that are predicted to be important for DNA binding. However, there are several differences with related proteins, especially in loops that extend from each monomer into the center of the C clamp and in the loops that connect the two subdomains of each protein, which may be important for determining PF-8''s mode of binding to DNA and to Pol-8. Using the crystal structures of PF-8, the herpes simplex virus catalytic subunit, and RB69 bacteriophage DNA polymerase in complex with DNA and initial experiments testing the effects of inhibition of PF-8-stimulated DNA synthesis by peptides derived from Pol-8, we suggest a model for how PF-8 might form a ternary complex with Pol-8 and DNA. The structure and the model suggest interesting similarities and differences in how PF-8 functions relative to structurally similar proteins.Most if not all organisms with DNA genomes have mechanisms to ensure processive DNA synthesis. In bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, DNA polymerase subunits include a catalytic subunit and a processivity factor, often referred to as a “sliding clamp.” In these organisms, a clamp loader protein is required to assemble the processivity factor onto the DNA (27, 37). The bacterial sliding (beta) clamp is made up of homodimers of a subunit that comprises three structurally similar subdomains (26), whereas archaeal and eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is composed of homotrimers that comprise two structurally similar subdomains (27, 37). For both of these clamps, the monomers assemble head-to-tail to form a closed homodimeric or homotrimeric ring, respectively, around the DNA. In these organisms, a clamp loader protein is required to efficiently load the clamp onto DNA, using an ATP-dependent process. Once loaded on DNA, the processivity factor is capable of binding directly to the DNA polymerase, conferring extended strand synthesis without falling off of the template (50).Herpesviruses encode their own DNA polymerases. However, unlike bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, herpesviruses do not encode clamp loaders to assemble their processivity factors onto the DNA. Yet, the accessory subunits of the herpesvirus DNA polymerases still associate with DNA with nanomolar affinity to enable long-chain DNA synthesis (9, 16, 23, 25, 29, 35, 44, 46, 53, 56). Human herpesviruses are divided into three classes, namely, the alpha-, beta-, and gammaherpesviruses, based on homologies found in their genomic organization as well as in protein sequences and function (45). Crystal structures have been determined for the processivity factor UL42 from the alphaherpesvirus herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and for UL44 from the betaherpesvirus human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) (2, 3, 58). Despite having little if any sequence homology with processivity factors outside of their herpesvirus subfamily, these structures all share the “processivity fold” originally seen in the structure of the bacterial beta clamp (26). Interestingly, some of these processivity factors have a different quaternary structure. PCNA forms a head-to-tail trimeric ring (18, 27), HSV-1 UL42 is a monomer (10, 14, 16, 46, 58) equivalent to one-third of the PCNA complex, and HCMV UL44 is a head-to-head dimer in the form of a C-shaped clamp (2, 3, 9).Both HSV-1 UL42 and HCMV UL44 have a basic face that has been shown to be important for interacting with DNA (25, 35). In the case of dimeric HCMV UL44, the basic surface of each monomer faces inward, toward the center of the C clamp, and includes a basic loop, called the “gap loop,” that is thought to wrap around DNA (24). Recently the crystal structure of the bacterial beta clamp was determined in complex with DNA (15). In that structure, DNA was found to be located in the central pore of the clamp. Amino acid residues that interacted with DNA were in positions structurally homologous to those found on the positively charged faces of UL42 and UL44.UL42 and UL44 each also has a surface, facing away from the DNA binding face, that is important for interacting with the catalytic subunit of the viral DNA polymerase. Indeed, both of these proteins have been crystallized in complex with C-terminal peptides from their respective catalytic subunits, HSV-1 UL30 and HCMV UL54 (2, 58). Together with biochemical and mutational analyses, these crystal structures indicated that, although the details of the interaction are different, the catalytic subunit of the polymerase binds to a region including and in close proximity to a long loop that connects the N- and C-terminal subdomains, called the interdomain connector loop (32-34). The corresponding region of PCNA is also important for polymerase attachment and mediates the interactions of PCNA with many other cellular proteins (40). Both UL54 and UL30 were shown to attach to their respective subunits, UL44 and UL42, by way of their extreme C termini. The C-terminal residues responsible for this interaction correspond to amino acids that are not detectably conserved, either by sequence or by structure, among herpesvirus catalytic subunits. The HSV-1 UL30-UL42 interaction involves a groove to one side of the UL42 connector loop, with hydrophilic interactions being critical (58). The HCMV UL54-UL44 interaction involves a crevice near the UL44 connector loop, and hydrophobic interactions are crucial (2, 32, 33). Moreover, the HCMV UL44 crevice is on the opposite side of the connector loop with respect to the HSV-1 UL42 groove.Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), a gammaherpesvirus, encodes a viral DNA polymerase catalytic subunit, Pol-8, and an accessory subunit, PF-8 (4, 7, 8, 29, 48, 57). PF-8 can bind to Pol-8 directly and specifically (8, 29) and is required for long-chain DNA synthesis in vitro (29). Similarly to UL44, PF-8 forms dimers in solution and when bound to DNA (9). Although it is likely that UL44 and PF-8 are the processivity factors for HCMV and KSHV, respectively, rigorous experiments demonstrating this have not been performed. However, for the sake of brevity and clarity, we will refer to these proteins as processivity factors.Here we present the crystal structure of PF-8 and show that PF-8 forms a head-to-head homodimer akin to UL44 but lacking the long gap loops which are thought to wrap around DNA. This suggests that PF-8 binds DNA differently than does UL44 or UL42. Because Pol-8 appears to lack a long, flexible C-terminal tail with a length comparable to those of other herpesvirus Pols, we expect the mode of binding of the catalytic subunit to be different as well. Based on structural data, information from homologs, and initial biochemical results, we were able to identify possible sites for interactions with DNA and Pol-8 and to propose a model for the simultaneous interaction of all three components of the complex. Further, the availability of crystal structures for all three herpesvirus classes provides new insights into comparative structure, function, and evolution.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

The C-Terminal Domain of Cernunnos/XLF Is Dispensable for DNA Repair In Vivo

The core nonhomologous end-joining DNA repair pathway is composed of seven factors: Ku70, Ku80, DNA-PKcs, Artemis, XRCC4 (X4), DNA ligase IV (L4), and Cernunnos/XLF (Cernunnos). Although Cernunnos and X4 are structurally related and participate in the same complex together with L4, they have distinct functions during DNA repair. L4 relies on X4 but not on Cernunnos for its stability, and L4 is required for optimal interaction of Cernunnos with X4. We demonstrate here, using in vitro-generated Cernunnos mutants and a series of functional assays in vivo, that the C-terminal region of Cernunnos is dispensable for its activity during DNA repair.Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) represents the main pathway for solving DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in mammals. The core of the NHEJ pathway is composed of seven proteins: Ku70, Ku80, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), Artemis, XRCC4 (X4), DNA ligase IV (L4), and Cernunnos/XLF (Cernunnos) (reviewed in reference 18). Briefly, the Ku70-Ku80 heterodimer bound to broken DNA recruits the serine/threonine kinase DNA-PKcs. DNA-PK phosphorylates downstream effectors such as the nuclease Artemis. The X4-L4 complex carries out the final joining of synapsed DNA ends in association with Cernunnos (2, 6). Cernunnos was identified through cDNA functional complementation of a fibroblast cell line obtained from a human patient with immune deficiency and microcephaly (5). The same factor, called XLF, was identified through a yeast two-hybrid screen with X4 as a bait (2).Cernunnos is structurally related to X4 and consists of a globular head domain followed by a coiled-coil region and an unstructured C-terminal domain (2, 6, 12). One major difference between the structures of X4 and Cernunnos appears in the coiled-coil region. While this region is linear in X4, a hinge in the middle of the coiled-coil of Cernunnos folds back the end of the domain toward the head (3, 14).Cernunnos interacts with the X4-L4 complex in vivo and in vitro (2, 6). Cernunnos and X4 both appear to interact directly with L4, but the Cernunnos-L4 interaction seems to be very weak (7). In addition, purified Cernunnos associates with DNA in a sequence-independent manner (20) but in a DNA length-dependent manner, like X4 (15). Although the X4-L4 complex can ligate DNA in vitro (10), Cernunnos further improves this activity (11, 15, 16, 20). Cernunnos seems important, in particular, for the ligation of mismatched or noncohesive DNA ends, but not for that of compatible DNA ends, in vitro (10, 20).Cernunnos is therefore a “core” NHEJ component, but limited information is available about its precise function during DNA repair in vivo. We show here that although X4 and Cernunnos share sequence and structural homologies, their functions are distinct. We also demonstrate that Cernunnos requires L4 for its association with X4. Lastly, the Cernunnos C terminus is dispensable for DNA repair following ionizing radiation (IR) and V(D)J recombination.     

Strategy for Extracting DNA from Clay Soil and Detecting a Specific Target Sequence via Selective Enrichment and Real-Time (Quantitative) PCR Amplification

We present a simple strategy for isolating and accurately enumerating target DNA from high-clay-content soils: desorption with buffers, an optional magnetic capture hybridization step, and quantitation via real-time PCR. With the developed technique, μg quantities of DNA were extracted from mg samples of pure kaolinite and a field clay soil.Isolating and characterizing DNA sequences for use in molecular methods are integral to evaluating microbial community diversity in soil (6, 21, 22, 24, 37). Any isolation protocol should maximize nucleic acid isolation while minimizing copurification of enzymatic inhibitors. Although several methods that focus on extraction of total community DNA from environmental soil and water samples have been published (7, 21, 26, 34), the lack of a standard nucleic acid isolation protocol (32) reflects the difficulty in accomplishing these goals, most likely due to the complex nature of the soil environment.DNA extraction is especially difficult for soils containing clay (3, 5), given the tight binding of DNA strands to clay soil particles (7, 10, 20). Additionally, extracellular DNA binds to and is copurified with soil humic substances (10), which inhibit the activity of enzymes such as restriction endonucleases and DNA polymerase (6, 13, 23). Although clay-bound DNA can be PCR amplified in the absence of inhibitors (1), it is often the case that inhibitors are present in the soil environment, among them bilirubin, bile salts, urobilinogens, and polysaccharides (40). Of these inhibitors, humic substances have been found to be the most recalcitrant (36).A promising technique for isolating specific target sequences from soil particles and enzymatic inhibitors is the magnetic capture hybridization-PCR technique (MCH-PCR) presented by Jacobsen (19) and used to obtain high detection sensitivities (11, 38).We have found no evidence in the published literature of the use of MCH-PCR on soils that have high clay contents and here present a three-step strategy for isolating specific DNA sequences from the most difficult soil environment—clay that contains humic substances—and enumerating a specific target sequence from the crude extract.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Processivity,Synergism, and Substrate Specificity of Thermobifida fusca Cel6B

A relationship between processivity and synergism has not been reported for cellulases, although both characteristics are very important for hydrolysis of insoluble substrates. Mutation of two residues located in the active site tunnel of Thermobifida fusca exocellulase Cel6B increased processivity on filter paper. Surprisingly, mixtures of the Cel6B mutant enzymes and T. fusca endocellulase Cel5A did not show increased synergism or processivity, and the mutant enzyme which had the highest processivity gave the poorest synergism. This study suggests that improving exocellulase processivity might be not an effective strategy for producing improved cellulase mixtures for biomass conversion. The inverse relationship between the activities of many of the mutant enzymes with bacterial microcrystalline cellulose and their activities with carboxymethyl cellulose indicated that there are differences in the mechanisms of hydrolysis for these substrates, supporting the possibility of engineering Cel6B to target selected substrates.Cellulose is a linear homopolymer of β-1,4-linked anhydrous glucosyl residues with a degree of polymerization (DP) of up to 15,000 (5). Adjacent glucose residues in cellulose are oriented at an angle of 180° to each other, making cellobiose the basic unit of cellulose structure (5). The β-1,4-glycosidic bonds of cellulose are enzymatically hydrolyzed by three classes of cellulases. Endocellulases (EC 3.2.1.4) cleave cellulose chains internally, generating products of variable length with new chain ends, while exocellulases, also called cellobiohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.91), act from one end of a cellulose chain and processively cleave off cellobiose as the main product. The third class is the processive endocellulases, which can be produced by bacteria (2, 20).Processivity and synergism are important properties of cellulases, particularly for hydrolysis of crystalline substrates. Processivity indicates how far a cellulase molecule proceeds and hydrolyzes a substrate chain before there is dissociation. Processivity can be measured indirectly by determining the ratio of soluble products to insoluble products in filter paper assays (14, 19, 39). Although this approach might not discriminate exocellulases from highly processive endocellulases (12), it is very helpful for comparing mutants of the same enzyme (19). The processivity of some glycoside hydrolases also can be determined from the ratio of dimers to monomers in the hydrolysate (13).Four types of synergism have been demonstrated in cellulase systems: synergism between endocellulases and exocellulases, synergism between reducing- and nonreducing-end-directed exocellulases, synergism between processive endocellulases and endo- or exocellulases, and synergism between β-glucosidases and other cellulases (3). Synergism is dependent on a number of factors, including the physicochemical properties of the substrate and the ratio of the individual enzymes (10).Great effort has been focused on improving enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulases in biomass (24). However, studying biomass is difficult due to its complexity; instead, nearly pure cellulose, amorphous cellulose, or carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) are commonly used as substrates (22).Random mutagenesis approaches and rational protein design have been used to study cellulose hydrolysis (18), to improve the activity of catalytic domains and carbohydrate-binding modules (19), and to thermostabilize cellulases (9). Increased knowledge of cellulase structures and improvements in modeling software (1) have facilitated rational protein design. The structures of five glycoside hydrolase family 6 cellulases from four microorganisms, Trichoderma reesei (23), Thermobifida fusca (26), Humicola insolens (6, 29), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (30), have been determined. Structural analysis showed that the active sites of the exocellulases are enclosed by two long loops forming a tunnel, while the endocellulases have an open active site groove. Movement of one of these loops is important for enzymatic activity (6, 35, 37).In nature, as well as for industrial applications, mixtures of cellulase are required; therefore, a better strategy for designing individual enzymes to improve the activity of mixtures is critical. In this study, we used Cel6B, a nonreducing-end-directed, inverting exocellulase from Thermobifida fusca, a thermophilic soil bacterium, as a model cellulase to investigate the impact of improved exocellulases in mixtures with endocellulases since T. fusca Cel6B is important for achieving the maximum activity of synergistic mixtures (35). Cel6B activity is similar to that of the fungal T. reesei exocellulase Cel6A, but Cel6B has higher thermostability and a much broader pH optimum (36). Six noncatalytic residues in the active site tunnel of T. fusca exocellulase Cel6B were mutated to obtain insight into the role of these residues in processivity and substrate specificity. Two mutant enzymes that showed higher activity with filter paper and processivity were investigated further for production of oligosaccharides and synergism to analyze the relationship between processivity and synergism.     

Widely Conserved Recombination Patterns among Single-Stranded DNA Viruses

The combinatorial nature of genetic recombination can potentially provide organisms with immediate access to many more positions in sequence space than can be reached by mutation alone. Recombination features particularly prominently in the evolution of a diverse range of viruses. Despite rapid progress having been made in the characterization of discrete recombination events for many species, little is currently known about either gross patterns of recombination across related virus families or the underlying processes that determine genome-wide recombination breakpoint distributions observable in nature. It has been hypothesized that the networks of coevolved molecular interactions that define the epistatic architectures of virus genomes might be damaged by recombination and therefore that selection strongly influences observable recombination patterns. For recombinants to thrive in nature, it is probably important that the portions of their genomes that they have inherited from different parents work well together. Here we describe a comparative analysis of recombination breakpoint distributions within the genomes of diverse single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) virus families. We show that whereas nonrandom breakpoint distributions in ssDNA virus genomes are partially attributable to mechanistic aspects of the recombination process, there is also a significant tendency for recombination breakpoints to fall either outside or on the peripheries of genes. In particular, we found significantly fewer recombination breakpoints within structural protein genes than within other gene types. Collectively, these results imply that natural selection acting against viruses expressing recombinant proteins is a major determinant of nonrandom recombination breakpoint distributions observable in most ssDNA virus families.Genetic recombination is a ubiquitous biological process that is both central to DNA repair pathways (10, 57) and an important evolutionary mechanism. By generating novel combinations of preexisting nucleotide polymorphisms, recombination can potentially accelerate evolution by increasing the population-wide genetic diversity upon which adaptive selection relies. Recombination can paradoxically also prevent the progressive accumulation of harmful mutations within individual genomes (18, 35, 53). Whereas its ability to defend high-fitness genomes from mutational decay possibly underlies the evolutionary value of sexuality in higher organisms, in many microbial species where pseudosexual genetic exchange is permissible among even highly divergent genomes, recombination can enable access to evolutionary innovations that would otherwise be inaccessible by mutation alone.Such interspecies recombination is fairly common in many virus families (8, 17, 27, 44, 82). It is becoming clear, however, that as with mutation events, most recombination events between distantly related genomes are maladaptive (5, 13, 38, 50, 63, 80). As genetic distances between parental genomes increase, so too does the probability of fitness defects in their recombinant offspring (16, 51). The viability of recombinants is apparently largely dependent on how severely recombination disrupts coevolved intragenome interaction networks (16, 32, 51). These networks include interacting nucleotide sequences that form secondary structures, sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions, interprotein interactions, and amino acid-amino acid interactions within protein three-dimensional folds.One virus family where such interaction networks appear to have a large impact on patterns of natural interspecies recombination are the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) geminiviruses. As with other ssDNA viruses, recombination is very common among the species of this family (62, 84). Partially conserved recombination hot and cold spots have been detected in different genera (39, 81) and are apparently caused by both differential mechanistic predispositions of genome regions to recombination and natural selection disfavoring the survival of recombinants with disrupted intragenome interaction networks (38, 51).Genome organization and rolling circle replication (RCR)—the mechanism by which geminiviruses and many other ssDNA viruses replicate (9, 67, 79; see reference 24 for a review)—seem to have a large influence on basal recombination rates in different parts of geminivirus genomes (20, 33, 39, 61, 81). To initiate RCR, virion-strand ssDNA molecules are converted by host-mediated pathways into double-stranded “replicative-form” (RF) DNAs (34, 67). Initiated by a virus-encoded replication-associated protein (Rep) at a well-defined virion-strand replication origin (v-ori), new virion strands are synthesized on the complementary strand of RF DNAs (28, 73, 74) by host DNA polymerases. Virion-strand replication is concomitant with the displacement of old virion strands, which, once complete, yields covalently closed ssDNA molecules which are either encapsidated or converted into additional RF DNAs. Genome-wide basal recombination rates in ssDNA viruses are probably strongly influenced by the specific characteristics of host DNA polymerases that enable RCR. Interruption of RCR has been implicated directly in geminivirus recombination (40) and is most likely responsible for increased basal recombination rates both within genes transcribed in the opposite direction from that of virion-strand replication (40, 71) and at the v-ori (1, 9, 20, 69, 74).Whereas most ssDNA virus families replicate via either a rolling circle mechanism (the Nanoviridae, Microviridae, and Geminiviridae) (3, 23, 24, 31, 59, 67, 74) or a related rolling hairpin mechanism (the Parvoviridae) (25, 76), among the Circoviridae only the Circovirus genus is known to use RCR (45). Although the Gyrovirus genus (the other member of the Circoviridae) and the anelloviruses (a currently unclassified ssDNA virus group) might also use RCR, it is currently unknown whether they do or not (78). Additionally, some members of the Begomovirus genus of the Geminiviridae either have a second genome component, called DNA-B, or are associated with satellite ssDNA molecules called DNA-1 and DNA-Beta, all of which also replicate by RCR (1, 47, 68).Recombination is known to occur in the parvoviruses (19, 43, 70), microviruses (66), anelloviruses (40, 46), circoviruses (11, 26, 60), nanoviruses (30), geminivirus DNA-B components, and geminivirus satellite molecules (2, 62). Given that most, if not all, of these ssDNA replicons are evolutionarily related to and share many biological features with the geminiviruses (22, 31, 36), it is of interest to determine whether conserved recombination patterns observed in the geminiviruses (61, 81) are evident in these other groups. To date, no comparative analyses have ever been performed with different ssDNA virus families to identify, for example, possible influences of genome organization on recombination breakpoint distributions found in these viruses.Here we compare recombination frequencies and recombination breakpoint distributions in most currently described ssDNA viruses and satellite molecules and identify a number of sequence exchange patterns that are broadly conserved across this entire group.     

Antiangiogenic Arming of an Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Enhances Antitumor Efficacy in Renal Cell Cancer Models

Oncolytic vaccinia viruses have shown compelling results in preclinical cancer models and promising preliminary safety and antitumor activity in early clinical trials. However, to facilitate systemic application it would be useful to improve tumor targeting and antitumor efficacy further. Here we report the generation of vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig, a targeted and armed oncolytic vaccinia virus. Tumor targeting was achieved by deletion of genes for thymidine kinase and vaccinia virus growth factor, which are necessary for replication in normal but not in cancer cells. Given the high vascularization typical of kidney cancers, we armed the virus with the soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 protein for an antiangiogenic effect. Systemic application of high doses of vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig resulted in cytokine induction in an immunocompromised mouse model. Upon histopathological analysis, splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis was seen in all virus-injected mice and was more pronounced in the vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig group. Analysis of the innate immune response after intravenous virus injection revealed high transient and dose-dependent cytokine elevations. When medium and low doses were used for intratumoral or intravenous injection, vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig exhibited a stronger antitumor effect than the unarmed control. Furthermore, expression of VEGFR-1-Ig was confirmed, and a concurrent antiangiogenic effect was seen. In an immunocompetent model, systemic vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig exhibited superior antitumor efficacy compared to the unarmed control virus. In conclusion, the targeted and armed vvdd-VEGFR-1-Ig has promising anticancer activity in renal cell cancer models. Extramedullary hematopoiesis may be a sensitive indicator of vaccinia virus effects in mice.In 2002 renal cell cancer accounted for more than 200,000 cases and 100,000 deaths worldwide (33). Unfortunately, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy yield low response rates (9, 17) in this cancer type. Thus, prognosis for patients is poor, especially when the disease is metastatic, as median survival is only 8 months (19). Although recently approved drugs, such as sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, and bevacizumab, have provided additional tools for treatment of renal cell cancer (7), they are usually not curative, and thus new treatment approaches are needed.Oncolytic vaccinia viruses are promising agents for cancer treatment and have shown compelling results in preclinical tumor models (40, 42, 45). Moreover, good safety and preliminary evidence of antitumor efficacy were seen in phase 1 clinical trials (22, 26, 32). Vaccinia virus has a strong oncolytic effect due to its fast replication cycle (45) and a high innate tropism to cancer tissue (34). Tumor targeting can be further improved by deleting vaccinia virus genes that are necessary for replication in normal cells but not in cancer cells. For example, deletions of either thymidine kinase (TK) or vaccinia virus growth factor (VGF) or both have been shown to reduce pathogenicity compared to wild-type virus (3, 5, 27). To enhance antitumor potency, oncolytic vaccinia viruses can be armed with therapeutic transgenes, such as immunostimulatory factors (26) or suicide genes (14, 16, 35). With regard to kidney cancer, an arming approach with antiangiogenenic molecules seems logical, considering the high vascularization characteristic of renal tumors (20).Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major player in tumor angiogenesis and is highly expressed in renal cell cancers (29). VEGF binds to the fms-like-tyrosine kinase receptor (flt-1 or VEGFR-1) and kinase domain region receptor (KDR or VEGFR-2) with high affinity (13). The soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-Ig fusion protein (VEGFR-1-Ig) used in this study is derived from the membrane-bound VEGFR-1 and binds human and murine VEGF without inducing vascular endothelial cell mitogenesis (31). Blocking VEGF with this or closely related molecules has been shown to inhibit tumor growth in several cancer models (18, 21, 25, 39).Although tumor cell selective replication can be enhanced by deletion of TK and/or VGF to reduce pathogenicity (3, 5, 27), high doses of attenuated vaccinia virus may increase serum cytokine concentrations which parallel the onset of toxic events, as seen with other viral vectors (2, 38). The potential “early” toxicity associated with oncolytic vaccinia viruses has not been completely elucidated heretofore (36, 46).Given the high vascularization of renal cell cancers and the pressing need to generate new antitumor agents with increased safety and efficacy, we hypothesized that an oncolytic vaccinia virus targeted by TK and VGF deletions and armed with VEGFR-1-Ig would exhibit enhanced antitumor efficacy due to its antiangiogenic properties in renal cell cancer models compared to a nonarmed control virus, allowing reduction of the treatment dose.     

High Abundance of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea in Coastal Waters,Determined Using a Modified DNA Extraction Method

Molecular characterizations of environmental microbial populations based on recovery and analysis of DNA generally assume efficient or unbiased extraction of DNA from different sample matrices and microbial groups. Appropriate controls to verify this basic assumption are rarely included. Here three different DNA extractions, performed with two commercial kits (FastDNA and UltraClean) and a standard phenol-chloroform method, and two alternative filtration methods (Sterivex and 25-mm-diameter polycarbonate filters) were evaluated, using the addition of Nitrosopumilus maritimus cells to track the recovery of DNA from marine Archaea. After the comparison, a simplified phenol-chloroform extraction method was developed and shown to be significantly superior, in terms of both the recovery and the purity of DNA, to other protocols now generally applied to environmental studies. The simplified and optimized method was used to quantify ammonia-oxidizing Archaea at different depth intervals in a fjord (Hood Canal) by quantitative PCR. The numbers of Archaea increased with depth, often constituting as much as 20% of the total bacterial community.Efficient DNA extraction from environmental samples is fundamental to many culture-independent characterizations (10). Thus, there was an early and concerted effort to establish appropriate methods of DNA extraction from different types of environmental samples (14, 19, 25, 30, 34, 43, 47). DNA extraction efficiency is particularly important for quantitative PCR (qPCR), because poor DNA extraction efficiency results in the underestimation of gene copy numbers in the samples examined (6, 42).Most methodological developments addressed DNA extraction from soil and sediment samples, with fewer comparative studies of the efficiency of collection and extraction from water samples (4, 13, 40). In part, a methodological focus on soils reflected the simplicity of filtration to collect aquatic populations and the generally good recovery of DNA from the Gram-negative bacteria making up a significant fraction of aquatic communities. However, small Archaea are now known to constitute a substantial fraction of the prokaryotic populations in marine and terrestrial systems (2, 7, 9, 20, 26, 31, 33, 45). Since the archaeal cell wall and membrane structures are distinct from those of bacteria, there is no assurance that commonly used extraction methods are adequate. With increasing reliance on commercially available bead-beating-type DNA extraction kits, these methods are now often used for different water samples (1, 5-7, 14, 19, 36). Although most protocols incorporate mechanical disruption to ensure more-uniform extraction than is possible by using methods that rely entirely on enzymatic digestion and/or chemical disruption (4, 13, 40), the suitability of these protocols for the concerted analysis of archaeal and bacterial populations has not been fully evaluated.In the studies reported here, the recently isolated marine archaeon Nitrosopumilus maritimus strain SCM1 (22) was therefore used as a reference standard for evaluation of the commonly employed DNA extraction methods by using qPCR. This archaeon was then used as a reference for the development of a simple, rapid, and efficient method of extracting DNA from both archaeal and bacterial cells. The modified protocol was subsequently employed to characterize the vertical distribution of ammonia-oxidizing Archaea in a fjord (Hood Canal) in Puget Sound (Washington State), revealing a high fractional representation of Archaea relative to Bacteria not observed previously in coastal waters.