Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.Membrane fusion is an essential step during the entry process of enveloped viruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), into target cells. The general pathway by which enveloped viruses fuse with target membranes through the action of fusion proteins is fairly well understood. Viral fusion proteins use the free energy liberated during their own protein conformational changes to draw the two membranes—viral and target—together. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate, in which the proximal leaflets of the two bilayers have merged but a viral pore has not yet formed and viral contents have not yet mixed with the cell cytoplasm (10, 38). Fusion proteins then drive the completion of fusion, which includes fusion pore formation, pore enlargement, and complete content mixing.HSV, an enveloped neurotropic virus, requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein B (gB), glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein H (gH), and glycoprotein L (gL)—to execute fusion (9, 57, 60). gB, gD, and gH are membrane bound; gL is a soluble protein which complexes with gH to form a heterodimer (gH/gL). HSV-1 gH is not trafficked to the cell or virion surface in the absence of gL (32, 52). The requirement of four entry glycoproteins sets HSV apart from other enveloped viruses, most of which induce fusion through the activity of a single fusion protein. Although the specific mode of HSV entry is cell type dependent—fusion with neurons and Vero cells occurs at the plasma membrane at neutral pH; fusion with HeLa and CHO cells involves pH-dependent endocytosis, and fusion with C10 cells involves pH-independent endocytosis (42, 45)—all routes of entry require gD, gB, and gH/gL. Furthermore, although some discrepancies between virus-cell and cell-cell fusion have been observed (8, 44, 55, 58), both generally require the actions of gD, gB, and gH/gL.Much work has gone toward the understanding of how the required HSV entry glycoproteins work together to accomplish fusion, and many questions remain. After viral attachment, mediated by glycoprotein C and/or gB (54), the first step in HSV fusion is thought to be gD binding a host cell receptor (either herpesvirus entry mediator [HVEM], nectin-1, nectin-2, or heparan sulfate modified by specific 3-O-sulfotransferases) (56). The gD-receptor interaction induces a conformational change in gD (39) that is thought to trigger gD-gB and/or gD-gH/gL interactions that are required for the progression of fusion (1-4, 13, 18, 23, 49).gB and gH/gL are considered the core fusion machinery of most herpesviruses. The HSV-1 gB structure revealed surprising structural homology to the postfusion structures of two known viral fusion proteins (31, 35, 51). This structural homology indicates that despite not being sufficient for HSV fusion, gB is likely a fusion protein. Although the gB cytoplasmic tail (CT) is not included in the solved structure, it acts as a regulator of fusion, as CT truncations can cause either hyperfusion or fusion-null phenotypes (5, 17). The gB CT has been proposed to bind stably to lipid membranes and negatively regulate membrane fusion (12). Another proposed regulator of gB function is gH/gL. Despite conflicting accounts of whether gD and a gD receptor are required for the interaction of gH/gL and gB (1, 3, 4), a recent study indicates that gH/gL and gB interact prior to fusion and that gB may interact with target membranes prior to an interaction with gH/gL (2). The gB-gH/gL interaction seems to be required for the progression of fusion.Compared to the other required HSV entry glycoproteins, the role of gH/gL during fusion remains enigmatic. Mutational studies have revealed several regions of the gH ectodomain, transmembrane domain (TM), and CT that are required for its function (19, 25, 26, 30, 33). gH/gL of another herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), have been shown to bind integrins during epithelial cell fusion, and soluble forms of HSV gH/gL have been shown to bind cells and inhibit viral entry in vitro (24, 46). However, the role of gH/gL binding to target cells in regard to the fusion process remains to be determined.There are some lines of evidence that suggest that gH/gL is a fusion protein. The gH/gL complexes of VZV and CMV have been reported to independently execute some level of cell-cell fusion (14, 37). HSV-1 gH/gL has been reported to independently mediate membrane fusion during nuclear egress (15). In silico analyses and studies of synthetic HSV gH peptides have proposed that gH has fusogenic properties (20, 21, 25-28). Finally, of most importance to the work we report here, gH/gL has been shown to be sufficient for induction of hemifusion in the presence of gD and a gD receptor, further promoting the premise that gH/gL is a fusion protein (59). However, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL revealed a tight complex of gH/gL in a “boot-like” structure, which bears no structural homology to any known fusion proteins (11). The HSV-2 gH/gL structure and research demonstrating that gH/gL and gB interactions are critical to fusion (2) have together prompted a new model of HSV fusion in which gH/gL is required to either negatively or positively regulate the activity of gB through direct binding.We wanted to investigate the ability of a previously reported gH CT mutant, 824L, to execute hemifusion. 824L gH contains a five-residue insertion at gH residue 824, just C-terminal of the TM domain. 824L is expressed on cell surfaces and incorporated into virions at levels indistinguishable from those of wild-type gH by either cell-based ELISA or immunoblotting, yet it is nonfunctional (33). We relied on a fusion assay capable of detecting hemifusion, developed by Subramanian et al. (59), which we modified to include an additional control for hemifusion or nonenlarging pore formation, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (GPI-HA). GPI-HA is a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, that is known to stall the fusion process before enlarging fusion pores are formed.We were surprised to find that in our hands, gD, a gD receptor, and gH/gL were insufficient for the induction of hemifusion or lipid mixing in both cell-based and virus-based fusion assays. We found that gD, gB, and gH/gL are all required to observe lipid mixing. Further, we found that gB, gD, gL, and 824L gH are insufficient for lipid mixing. Our findings support the emerging view, based on gH/gL structure, that the gH/gL complex does not function as a fusion protein and does not insert into target membranes to initiate the process of fusion through a hemifusion intermediate. Our findings also further demonstrate that mutations in the CT of gH can have a dramatic effect on the ability of gH/gL to function in fusion.     

Cross Talk among the Glycoproteins Involved in Herpes Simplex Virus Entry and Fusion: the Interaction between gB and gH/gL Does Not Necessarily Require gD

The gD, gB, and gH/gL glycoprotein quartet constitutes the basic apparatus for herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into the cell and fusion. gD serves as a receptor binding glycoprotein and trigger of fusion. The conserved gB and gH/gL execute fusion. Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of how the four glycoproteins engage in cross talk. While the independent interactions of gD with gB and gD with gH/gL have been documented, less is known of the interaction of gB with gH/gL. So far, this interaction has been detected only in the presence of gD by means of a split green fluorescent protein complementation assay. Here, we show that gB interacts with gH/gL in the absence of gD. The gB-gH/gL complex was best detected with a form of gB in which the endocytosis and phosphorylation motif have been deleted; this form of gB persists in the membranes of the exocytic pathway and is not endocytosed. The gB-gH/gL interaction was detected both in whole transfected cells by means of a split yellow fluorescent protein complementation assay and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. Results with a panel of chimeric forms of gB, in which portions of the glycoprotein bracketed by consecutive cysteines were replaced with the corresponding portions from human herpesvirus 8 gB, favor the view that gB carries multiple sites for interaction with gH/gL, and one of these sites is located in the pleckstrin-like domain 1 carrying the bipartite fusion loop.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into the cell requires a multipartite apparatus made of a quartet of viral glycoproteins, gD, gB, and the heterodimer gH/gL, and a multistep process that culminates in the fusion of the virion envelope with cell membranes (5, 6, 10, 25, 36, 41). gD serves as the receptor-binding glycoprotein, able to interact with alternative receptors, nectin1, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and, in some cells, modified heparan sulfate (9, 13, 30, 39). It can also be engineered to accept heterologous ligands able to interact with selected receptors present on tumor cells and thus represents a tool to redirect HSV tropism (21, 28, 29, 42). The heterodimer gH/gL and gB execute fusion and constitute the conserved fusion apparatus across the Herpesviridae family. gB structure in the postfusion conformation shows a trimer with a central coiled coil (19). gH shows elements typical of type 1 fusion glycoproteins, in particular, helices able to interact with membranes, and two heptad repeats potentially able to form a coiled coil (12, 15-18). The discovery that a soluble form of gD enables entry of gD-null virions revealed that gD serves the additional function of triggering fusion and led to the view that the major roles of gD are to sense that virus has reached a receptor-positive cell and to signal to gB and gH/gL that fusion is to be executed (8). Biochemical and structural analyses showed that the C-terminal region of the gD ectodomain, containing the profusion domain required for fusion but not for receptor binding, can undergo major conformational changes (11, 24). Specifically, it binds the gD core and masks or hinders the receptor binding sites, conferring upon the molecule a closed, auto-inhibited conformation (24). Alternatively, it may unfold, conferring upon gD an open conformation. It was proposed that the C terminus of gD unfolds from gD core at receptor binding and recruits gH/gL and gB to a quaternary complex. A key feature of the model was that complexes among the glycoprotein quartet were not preformed, but, rather, they would assemble at the onset of or at fusion execution.Central to understanding HSV entry/fusion has become the dissection of the interactions that occur among the members of the glycoprotein quartet and their significance to the process. A first evidence of a gD-gH/gL interaction was provided in coimmunoprecipitation studies (35). Interactions between gD and gH/gL and between gD and gB were subsequently detected by split green fluorescence protein (GFP) complementation assays, implying that gD can recruit gB and gH/gL independently of one another, a result that argues against a stepwise recruitment of the glycoproteins to gD. In agreement with the proposed model, the interaction between gH/gL and gB was detected in the presence of transfected or soluble gD (1, 2). However, further studies highlighted levels of complexity not foreseen in the initial model. Thus, pull-down analyses showed that the interaction sites in gD with gB and with gH/gL lie in part outside the C-terminal portion of the gD ectodomain, that resting virions contain small amounts of gD in complex with gB and with gH/gL prior to encountering cells, and that de novo gD-gB complexes were not detected at virus entry into the cell (14).A major objective of current studies was to analyze the interaction of gB with gH/gL. We documented the interaction by two independent assays, i.e., by a complementation assay of split yellow fluorescent protein Venus (herein indicated as YFP) (31) in whole cells and, biochemically, by a pull-down assay. The latter was applied recently in our laboratory and is based on the ability of One-Strep-tagged proteins (e.g., gH) to specifically absorb to Strep-Tactin resin and thus retain any protein in complex (14). To preliminarily search for gB regions critical for the interaction with gH/gL, we engineered chimeric forms of HSV-1 and human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) gB in which the cysteines were preserved. While none of the chimeras was completely defective in the interaction, the interactions in the chimeras carrying substitutions in the pleckstrin-like domain 1—the domain that carries the bipartite fusion loops—were hampered. Altogether, the results underscore the ability of gB to interact with gH/gL in the absence of gD and favor the view that sites in gB for interaction with gH/gL involve multiple contacts, one of which is located in the domain that carries the fusion loops.     

Cascade of Events Governing Cell-Cell Fusion Induced by Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoproteins gD,gH/gL,and gB

Herpesviruses minimally require the envelope proteins gB and gH/gL for virus entry and cell-cell fusion; herpes simplex virus (HSV) additionally requires the receptor-binding protein gD. Although gB is a class III fusion protein, gH/gL does not resemble any documented viral fusion protein at a structural level. Based on those data, we proposed that gH/gL does not function as a cofusogen with gB but instead regulates the fusogenic activity of gB. Here, we present data to support that hypothesis. First, receptor-positive B78H1-C10 cells expressing gH/gL fused with receptor-negative B78H1 cells expressing gB and gD (fusion in trans). Second, fusion occurred when gH/gL-expressing C10 cells preexposed to soluble gD were subsequently cocultured with gB-expressing B78 cells. In contrast, prior exposure of gB-expressing C10 cells to soluble gD did not promote subsequent fusion with gH/gL-expressing B78 cells. These data suggest that fusion involves activation of gH/gL by receptor-bound gD. Most importantly, soluble gH/gL triggered a low level of fusion of C10 cells expressing gD and gB; a much higher level was achieved when gB-expressing C10 cells were exposed to a combination of soluble gH/gL and gD. These data clearly show that gB acts as the HSV fusogen following activation by gD and gH/gL. We suggest the following steps leading to fusion: (i) conformational changes to gD upon receptor binding, (ii) alteration of gH/gL by receptor-activated gD, and (iii) upregulation of the fusogenic potential of gB following its interaction with activated gH/gL. The third step may be common to other herpesviruses.Herpesviruses enter cells by fusing their envelopes with host cell membranes either by direct fusion at the plasma membrane or by pH-dependent or -independent endocytosis, depending on the target cell (27, 29, 39). Although the entry pathways of other enveloped viruses are similarly diverse (8), all systems for which molecular details have been obtained rely on a single fusion protein (43); herpesviruses are unique in their use of gB and the gH/gL heterodimer as their core fusion machinery (17, 37). Some herpesviruses employ additional receptor-binding glycoproteins, e.g., herpex simplex virus (HSV) gD, and others require gH/gL-associated proteins, e.g., UL128-131 of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (34) or gp42 of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (42). This complexity has made it difficult to unravel the mechanism of herpesvirus entry.Ultrastructural and biochemical studies have shown that for HSV entry, binding of gD to one of its receptors, either HVEM or nectin-1 (36), activates the downstream events that drive gB- and gH/gL-dependent fusion (17). The structure of the gB ectodomain (18) bears striking structural homology to the postfusion form of the single fusion protein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (33). However, unlike the other class III viral fusion proteins, VSV G and baculovirus gp64 (5), gB requires gH/gL to function in virus-cell and cell-cell fusion (17). A number of investigations support the concept that gH/gL might also be fusogenic (13, 41). Some have suggested that a multiprotein complex comprised of gD, gH/gL, and gB might be assembled to cause fusion (14). Using bimolecular complementation (BiMC), we and others showed that interactions can occur between half enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-tagged gB (e.g., gBn) and tagged gD (e.g., gDc) or between tagged gD and tagged gH (1, 3). However, because these occur in the absence of one of the other essential components, e.g., a receptor, we could not assess their functional significance. Importantly, gH/gL and gB interact with each other only in response to receptor binding by gD (1-3, 12). We subsequently showed that this interaction precedes fusion and is required for it to occur (2). Thus, we were able to conclude that gH/gL must interact with gB, whether transiently or stably, in order for fusion to occur. Whether gD was indeed involved in a multiprotein complex was not clear, nor was the role of gH/gL in promoting fusion initiated by gD-receptor binding. The lack of structural data for gH/gL left its potential role as a fusogen unresolved.However, in 2010, the structure of gH/gL of HSV-2 was solved in collaboration with Chowdary et al. (12). Structurally, gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusogen, thereby forcing a reconsideration of its function in promoting virus-cell and cell-cell fusion. We hypothesized that gH/gL does not likely act as a cofusogen with gB but rather regulates fusion by gB (12).In this report, we argue that as a regulator of fusion, gH/gL might not have to be in the same membrane as gB in order to regulate its activity, i.e., gH/gL on one cell might promote fusion of gB expressed by another cell, as long as gD and a gD receptor are also present. In support of this, it was recently shown that gH/gL and gB of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can cause cell-cell fusion when expressed by distinct cells (in trans) (41). We present evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL can cause cell-cell fusion when they are expressed in trans, a process that requires both gD and a gD receptor. Although the efficiency of fusion in trans is low compared with that of fusion when gB and gH/gL are in cis (as they would be when in the virus), separation of these proteins onto two different cells enabled us to dissect the order in which each protein acts along the pathway to fusion. Moreover, we found that a combination of soluble gD (not membrane bound) and soluble gH/gL (also not membrane bound) could trigger fusion of receptor-bearing cells that had been transfected with the gene for gB. Our data show that gD, gH/gL, and gB act in a series of steps whereby gD is first activated by binding its cell receptor. Previous studies showed that receptor binding causes gD to undergo conformational changes (17). Based on the data in this paper, we propose that these changes then enable gD to activate gH/gL into a form that in turn binds to and activates the fusogenic activity of gB. Although we do not know whether any of these reactions result in the formation of a stable complex, our data suggest that gB is the sole HSV fusogen and that gD and gH/gL act to upregulate cell-cell fusion and most likely virus-cell fusion, leading to HSV entry.     

Fusion between Perinuclear Virions and the Outer Nuclear Membrane Requires the Fusogenic Activity of Herpes Simplex Virus gB

Herpesviruses cross nuclear membranes (NMs) in two steps, as follows: (i) capsids assemble and bud through the inner NM into the perinuclear space, producing enveloped virus particles, and (ii) the envelopes of these virus particles fuse with the outer NM. Two herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins, gB and gH (the latter, likely complexed as a heterodimer with gL), are necessary for the second step of this process. Mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate in the perinuclear space or in herniations (membrane vesicles derived from the inner NM). Both gB and gH/gL are also known to act directly in fusing the virion envelope with host cell membranes during HSV entry into cells, i.e., both glycoproteins appear to function directly in different aspects of the membrane fusion process. We hypothesized that HSV gB and gH/gL also act directly in the membrane fusion that occurs during virus egress from the nucleus. Previous studies of the role of gB and gH/gL in nuclear egress involved HSV gB and gH null mutants that could potentially also possess gross defects in the virion envelope. Here, we produced recombinant HSV-expressing mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in the hydrophobic “fusion loops.” These fusion loops are thought to play a direct role in membrane fusion by insertion into cellular membranes. HSV recombinants expressing gB with any one of four fusion loop mutations (W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D) were unable to enter cells. Moreover, two of the mutants, W174Y and Y179K, displayed reduced abilities to mediate HSV cell-to-cell spread, and W174R and A261D exhibited no spread. All mutant viruses exhibited defects in nuclear egress, enveloped virions accumulated in herniations and in the perinuclear space, and fewer enveloped virions were detected on cell surfaces. These results support the hypothesis that gB functions directly to mediate the fusion between perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM.Herpesvirus glycoproteins gB and gH/gL participate in two separate membrane fusion events that occur during different stages of virus replication. First, during virus entry into cells, gB and gH/gL promote fusion between the virion envelope and either the plasma membrane or endosomes (reviewed in references 6, 21, 27, and 39). Second, herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB and gH (likely complexed to form a heterodimer with gL), and likely homologues in other herpesviruses, promote nuclear egress (12). Herpesvirus capsids are produced in the nucleus and cross the nuclear envelope (NE) by envelopment at the inner nuclear membrane (NM), producing perinuclear virions that then fuse with the outer NM (reviewed in references 35 and 36). There is evidence that HSV gB and gH/gL function in a redundant fashion in fusion between enveloped, perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12), whereas both gB and gH/gL are essential for entry fusion (8, 13, 38). Much more is known about the mechanisms involved in entry fusion than those involved in egress fusion, and many important questions remain in terms of how these two membrane fusion processes relate to each other.Entry of HSV into cells involves interactions between the viral receptor-binding protein gD and the gD receptors (16, 28, 30, 37). When gD binds to its receptors, there are conformational changes in gD which apparently activate gB and gH/gL, so that these glycoproteins promote fusion involving the virion envelope and cellular membranes (21, 32). By using split green fluorescent protein fusion proteins, also denoted bimolecular complementation, two groups showed that gD binding to gD ligands triggers interactions between gB and gH/gL and that this is accompanied by cell-cell fusion (1, 2). There is also evidence that gB and gH/gL contribute to different stages of membrane fusion. When gH/gL is expressed with gD, there is hemifusion (mixing of the outer leaflets of membranes) of adjacent cells, and this partial fusion is apparently mediated by gH/gL (41). However, full fusion (mixing of both inner and outer leaflets) occurs only when gB is coexpressed with gD and gH/gL (41). Also supporting a role for gH in membrane fusion, peptides based on heptad repeats in gH can disrupt model membranes (14, 15, 17). HSV gB is a class III fusion protein, structurally similar to vesicular stomatitis virus G protein, with a three-stranded coil-coil barrel in the central region of the molecule reminiscent of class I fusion proteins, e.g., influenza virus hemagglutinin (22). Therefore, herpesvirus gB and gH/gL differ substantially from the fusion proteins expressed by all other well-studied viruses because both gB and gH/gL participate directly in membrane fusion, apparently functioning in different aspects of entry fusion.HSV gB and other viral class III fusion proteins differ from class I fusion proteins that have N-terminal, hydrophobic fusion peptides because class III fusion proteins possess internal bipartite “fusion loops” composed of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues (3, 22). In the solved structure of the HSV gB ectodomain, which might represent a postfusion form of the protein, the fusion loops are located near the base of the molecule, adjacent to the virion envelope (22). Mutant forms of gB with single amino acid substitutions in these fusion loops displayed diminished cell-cell fusion activity when transfected into cells with gD and gH/gL (20). Cell-cell fusion approximates the fusion that occurs during entry, defining the minimal fusion machinery, although there are differences between entry and cell-cell fusion (10). Moreover, full-length gB molecules with fusion loop mutations failed to complement gB null HSV (19). Recently, it was demonstrated that the HSV gB extracellular domain can interact with liposomes in vitro and that this binding depends upon gB''s fusion loops (19).Herpesvirus capsids are assembled in the nucleus and acquire an envelope by budding through the inner NM. For a short time, enveloped virus particles are found in the space between the inner and outer NMs (perinuclear space), but then the envelopes of these particles fuse with the outer NM, releasing capsids into the cytoplasm (reviewed in references 35 and 36). Cytoplasmic capsids acquire a second envelope by budding into the trans-Golgi network, and this secondary envelopment involves redundant or additive functions of gE/gI and gD, i.e., either of these glycoproteins will suffice (11). The second step of the nuclear egress pathway involving membrane fusion between the envelope of perinuclear particles and the outer NM requires HSV glycoproteins gB and gH/gL (12). HSV double mutants lacking both gB and gH accumulate enveloped virus particles in the perinuclear space and in herniations, i.e., membrane vesicles that bulge into the nucleoplasm and derive from the inner NM (12). These observations, coupled with the evidence that gB and gH/gL are fusion proteins, suggested that gB and gH/gL promote the fusion between virus particles and the outer NM. However, there is one important difference between nuclear egress fusion and entry fusion. Virus mutants lacking either gB or gH are unable to enter cells, but such mutants have fewer defects in nuclear egress than double mutants lacking both gB and gH (12). Thus, as with secondary envelopment that involves gD and gE/gI, glycoproteins gB and gH/gL act in a redundant or additive fashion to mediate the fusion between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM. It is also important to note that there appear to be other mechanisms by which HSV particles can exit the perinuclear space. For example, although a substantial number of gB gH null double mutants accumulated in herniations (increased by ∼10-fold), some virions were seen on cell surfaces, although their numbers were reduced by ∼2.5- to 5-fold compared with those of wild-type HSV (12, 46).HSV entry fusion is triggered by gD binding to one of its ligands. However, it is not clear what triggers fusion of the envelope of perinuclear particles with the outer NM. gD, gB, gH, gM, gK, and other viral membrane proteins are all present in NMs and in perinuclear virus particles (4, 12, 25, 40, 42, 44). It seems unlikely that there are substantial quantities of known gD receptors in NMs, although this has not been carefully examined and there may well be unidentified gD receptors present in NMs. However, if fusion at NMs is not activated by gD binding to gD receptors, there must be other mechanisms to trigger this fusion. There is evidence that HSV gK negatively regulates fusion at the NE because (i) overexpression of gK causes enveloped virus particles to accumulate in the perinuclear space (25) and (ii) gK is primarily localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and NM and is not substantially found in extracellular virions (26, 34). Another potential regulatory mechanism for fusion at the outer NM involves phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of gB by the HSV kinase US3 (46). An HSV recombinant lacking gH and expressing a mutant gB with a substitution, T887A, affecting an amino acid in the gB cytoplasmic domain displayed reduced US3-dependent phosphorylation and accumulated enveloped virus particles in herniations (46). This mutation in gB did not alter HSV entry into cells (31, 46). Together, these results suggest that HSV fusion with the outer NM differs from entry fusion in some, but likely not all, important mechanistic details.Given that both gB and gH/gL are well established as fusion proteins for virus entry, we hypothesized that these glycoproteins directly mediate the membrane fusion that occurs between the envelope of perinuclear virus particles and the outer NM (12, 46). However, there are other possibilities. For example, it is conceivable that loss of both gB and gH alters the structure of the envelope of perinuclear HSV virions so that other HSV glycoproteins (that directly promote fusion) are affected. To address this issue and extend our understanding of how gB functions in nuclear egress fusion, we constructed HSV recombinants that express mutant forms of gB with substitutions in the fusion loops. These viruses also lacked gH, making nuclear egress totally dependent on a functional form of gB. By propagating these recombinants using gH-expressing cells, we could produce virus particles including gH and the mutant gB molecules. These HSV recombinants expressing gH as well as gB fusion loops, W174R, W174Y, Y179K, and A261D, were all unable to enter cells. However, two recombinants, expressing W174Y and Y179K, exhibited some cell-to-cell spread while the other two, expressing W174R and A261D, did not spread beyond single infected cells. All four recombinants infected into cells lacking gH exhibited defects in nuclear egress. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that gB acts directly to mediate the fusion of the virion envelope with the outer NM during HSV egress.     

Bimolecular Complementation Defines Functional Regions of Herpes Simplex Virus gB That Are Involved with gH/gL as a Necessary Step Leading to Cell Fusion

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into cells requires four membrane glycoproteins: gD is the receptor binding protein, and gB and gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery. Crystal structures of gD and its receptors have provided a basis for understanding the initial triggering steps, but how the core fusion proteins function remains unknown. The gB crystal structure shows that it is a class III fusion protein, yet unlike other class members, gB itself does not cause fusion. Bimolecular complementation (BiMC) studies have shown that gD-receptor binding triggers an interaction between gB and gH/gL and concurrently triggers fusion. Left unanswered was whether BiMC led to fusion or was a by-product of it. We used gB monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to block different aspects of these events. Non-virus-neutralizing MAbs to gB failed to block BiMC or fusion. In contrast, gB MAbs that neutralize virus blocked fusion. These MAbs map to three functional regions (FR) of gB. MAbs to FR1, which contains the fusion loops, and FR2 blocked both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, MAbs to FR3, a region involved in receptor binding, blocked fusion but not BiMC. Thus, FR3 MAbs separate the BiMC interaction from fusion, suggesting that BiMC occurs prior to fusion. When substituted for wild-type (wt) gB, fusion loop mutants blocked fusion and BiMC, suggesting that loop insertion precedes BiMC. Thus, we postulate that each of the gB FRs are involved in different aspects of the path leading to fusion. Upon triggering by gD, gB fusion loops are inserted into target lipid membranes. gB then interacts with gH/gL, and this interaction is eventually followed by fusion.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells requires four viral glycoproteins, gB, gD, gH, and gL, plus one of several cell receptors, either herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, or 3-OST (45). Crystal structures and other studies have documented that receptor binding triggers conformational changes to gD that trigger the downstream events leading to fusion (10, 11, 18, 26, 28, 52). Moreover, when HSV receptor-bearing cells are transfected with expression plasmids for glycoproteins gB, gD, gH, and gL, the cells fuse to form multinucleated giant cells or syncytia (39, 48). However, the precise series of events that take place after receptor binding have not yet been fully elucidated. What we do know is that both gB and a heterodimer of gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery that is conserved and required for the fusion step of entry of all herpesviruses (18, 26, 30, 46, 49).Thus far, we know the crystal structure of one form of the gB ectodomain of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) (19). This protein has the characteristics of a fusion protein and is a charter member of the class III group of viral fusion proteins (4). Others in this class include Epstein-Barr virus gB, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G, and baculovirus gp64 (5, 22, 41). Like VSV G and gp64, gB has two putative fusion loops at the base of each protomer of the crystallized trimer. Single-amino-acid mutations in many of the hydrophobic residues of the putative fusion loops of gB ablate its ability to function in cell-cell fusion assays (16, 17). Moreover, these mutants are unable to complement the entry of a gB-null virus (16). Finally, the ectodomains of these mutants, unlike wild-type protein, failed to coassociate with liposomes, indicating that the putative fusion loops do insert into membranes (16, 17). Recently, it was shown that several of these mutants are also defective for fusion events involved in virus egress (51). Together, these studies provide compelling evidence that HSV gB functions as a fusion protein and that the fusion loops are critical for this function. However, unlike VSV G and baculovirus gp64, gB does not function on its own in entry but, rather, requires the participation of gH/gL. In the absence of crystallographic data for gH/gL, it is not yet clear what role it plays in herpesvirus fusion. In a previous study, we used bimolecular complementation (BiMC) to examine protein-protein interactions that occur among the viral glycoproteins during fusion (1). A similar study was carried out by Avitabile et al. (2). The BiMC assay is based on the observation that N- and C-terminal fragments of green fluorescent protein (GFP) (and derivatives such as enhanced yellow fluorescent protein [EYFP]) do not spontaneously reconstitute a functional fluorophore (20, 29, 40). However, the codons for each half can be appended to the genes for two interacting proteins (23, 24). When these are cotransfected, an interaction between the two proteins of interest brings the two halves of the fluorophore in close enough contact to restore fluorescence.When HSV receptor-bearing cells, such as B78H1 cells that are engineered to express nectin-1, are transfected with plasmids that express gB, gD, gH, and gL, they undergo cell-cell fusion (13, 15, 27, 31, 48). When gD is omitted, no fusion occurs. We found that fusion of these transfected cells could be triggered by addition of a soluble form of gD (the gD ectodomain). We then used this approach to examine interactions between gB and gH/gL during cell fusion (1). Therefore, we tagged gB with the C-terminal half of EYFP and gH with the N-terminal half. When plasmids bearing these forms were cotransfected into C10 cells along with a plasmid for untagged gL, no fusion occurred, but importantly, no BiMC occurred. However, when we added gD306, cells began to fuse within 10 min, and all of the syncytia that formed exhibited bright EYFP fluorescence indicative of BiMC. We concluded that gD triggers both fusion and a physical interaction between gB and gH/gL. However, these experiments did not separate these two events, so we were unable to determine if the interaction preceded fusion or merely was a by-product of it.The purpose of this study was to determine if the gB-gH/gL interaction is essential for fusion and if it occurs prior to fusion. We focused on gB because its structure is known and we have a panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to gB. Our approach was to determine which of these MAbs, if any, could block fusion and also block the interaction with gH/gL. We also examined the effect of mutations to the fusion loops of gB on its interaction with gH/gL. We previously mapped these MAbs to four functional regions (FR) of gB, three of which were resolved in the crystal structure (6, 19). Of these, FR1 contains the fusion loops, FR2 is in the center of the gB structure with no known function, and FR3 is at in the crown of the protein and may be involved in binding to cells (7). Our rationale was that if the interaction between gB and gH/gL is important for fusion, then it should not be blocked by nonneutralizing anti-gB MAbs. At the same time, we thought that some neutralizing MAbs might not only block fusion but also block BiMC. We found that neutralizing MAbs to FR1 and FR2 inhibited both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, we found that neutralizing MAbs that map to FR3 blocked fusion but failed to block the interaction between gB and gH/gL, thereby dissociating the two events. Finally, we found that gB mutants with changes in the fusion loops that were fusion negative were also unable to bind to gH/gL. The latter results suggest that insertion of gB into the target membrane precedes its interaction with gH/gL.     

Insertion Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein H Reduce Cell Surface Expression,Slow the Rate of Cell Fusion,or Abrogate Functions in Cell Fusion and Viral Entry

Of the four required herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry glycoproteins, the precise role of gH-gL in fusion remains the most elusive. The heterodimer gH-gL has been proposed to mediate hemifusion after the interaction of another required glycoprotein, gD, with a receptor. To identify functional domains of HSV-1 gH, we generated 22 randomized linker-insertion mutants. Analyses of 22 gH mutants revealed that gH is relatively tolerant of insertion mutations, as 15 of 22 mutants permitted normal processing and transport of gH-gL to the cell surface. gH mutants that were not expressed well at the cell surface did not function in fusion or viral entry. The screening of gH mutants for function revealed the following: (i) for wild-type gH and some gH mutants, fusion with nectin-1-expressing target cells occurred more rapidly than with herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM)-expressing target cells; (ii) some gH mutants reduced the rate of cell fusion without abrogating fusion completely, indicating that gH may play a role in governing the kinetics of fusion and may be responsible for a rate-limiting first stage in HSV-1 fusion; and (iii) only one gH mutant, located within the short cytoplasmic tail, completely abrogated function, indicating that the gH cytoplasmic tail is crucial for cell fusion and viral infectivity.Herpes simplex virus (HSV), an enveloped neurotropic virus, infects target cells via membrane fusion, a process executed by viral fusion proteins capable of inserting into target membranes. Unlike many enveloped viruses that induce fusion through the activity of a single viral fusion protein, HSV requires four glycoproteins, glycoprotein B (gB), glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein H (gH), and glycoprotein L (gL), to execute fusion (6, 40, 42). The focus of this study, gH, is expressed as a heterodimer with gL (gH-gL). HSV gH and gL rely on one another for proper folding, posttranslational processing, and transport to the cell and virion surface (5, 23, 35).A sequential model of entry is the prevailing working hypothesis of HSV entry (1-3, 28, 32, 41). Viral attachment is mediated by the binding of glycoprotein C (gC) or gB to cell surface glycosaminoglycans such as heparan sulfate (38). The subsequent fusion between the virion envelope and host cell membrane is thought to result from a series of concerted events. First, gD binds to one of its host cell receptors. These receptors include herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family; nectin-1 and nectin-2, cell adhesion molecules of the Ig superfamily; and heparan sulfate modified by specific 3-O-sulfotransferases (39).It was previously proposed that gD binding a receptor induces a conformational change that allows for interactions between gD, gB, and/or gH-gL (1, 2, 8, 10, 16, 25, 32). It is thought that while gD functions primarily in receptor binding, gB and gH-gL function as the core fusion machinery of HSV.Based on its crystal structure, gB has structural features typical of viral fusion proteins in general and is structurally similar to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) glycoprotein G, the fusion protein of VSV (22, 34). In addition to its resemblance to other viral fusogens, gB also binds its own receptor, paired immunoglobulin-like receptor (PILRalpha) (36, 37). Importantly, HSV gB does not successfully execute fusion in the absence of gD or gH-gL (41). Compared to the other required HSV entry glycoproteins, relatively little is known about the specific roles of gH-gL during fusion. The structure of gH-gL is unknown, although in silico analyses and studies of synthetic gH peptides suggested that gH also has fusogenic properties (12, 13, 17-20).gD, a gD receptor, and gH-gL have been shown to be sufficient for inducing hemifusion, the mixing of the proximal leaflets of the viral and host cell bilayers (41). Several lines of research suggest that the subsequent step in fusion is an interaction between gH-gL and gB, with the latter glycoprotein being required for a committed and expanding fusion pore (1-3, 16, 28, 41). However, it is still unclear whether the gB and gH-gL interaction requires that gD first bind a receptor (1, 3), indicating that another viable model of HSV entry may be nonsequential gD-gB-gH-gL complex formation.Several domains important for fusion within HSV gH have been discerned. The only function associated with the N-terminal domain of HSV gH, to date, is gL binding. Residues 377 to 397 within a predicted alpha-helix in the gH ectodomain are required for cell-cell fusion and complementation of a gH-null virus (18). The mutation of a predicted heptad repeat region spanning residues 443 to 471 abrogated cell-cell fusion (17). Insertion mutations within what has been termed the pretransmembrane region of gH have also been shown to abrogate fusion and viral entry (11). The glycine residue at position 812 within the predicted gH transmembrane domain was shown previously to be important for fusion (21). Finally, although the deletion of the final six residues of gH (residues 832 to 838), which are within its short cytoplasmic tail, has no effect on fusion, further deletions were shown to decrease polykaryocyte formation by a syncytial HSV strain (4, 43).We used a transposon-based comprehensive random linker-insertion mutagenesis strategy to generate a library of mutants spanning the entire length of HSV-1 gH, an 838-amino-acid type I membrane protein. A panel of 22 insertion mutants was generated, 15 of which were expressed at near-normal levels on the cell surface. Interestingly, some insertions reduced the rate of cell fusion rather than abrogating cell fusion activity altogether, suggesting that gH may have a role in governing the kinetics of fusion and may be responsible for a rate-limiting first stage in HSV-1 fusion. Additionally, one insertion mutation that completely abrogated cell fusion and viral infectivity is located within the gH cytoplasmic tail, indicating that the short C-terminal tail of gH is critical for cell fusion and entry mediated by HSV-1.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 UL20 Protein and the Amino Terminus of Glycoprotein K (gK) Physically Interact with gB

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein K (gK) and the UL20 protein (UL20p) are strictly required for virus-induced cell fusion, and mutations within either the gK or UL20 gene cause extensive cell fusion (syncytium formation). We have shown that gK forms a functional protein complex with UL20p, which is required for all gK and UL20p-associated functions in the HSV-1 life cycle. Recently, we showed that the amino-terminal 82 amino acids (aa) of gK (gKa) were required for the expression of the syncytial phenotype of the mutant virus gBΔ28 lacking the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB (V. N. Chouljenko, A. V. Iyer, S. Chowdhury, D. V. Chouljenko, and K. G. Kousoulas, J. Virol. 83:12301-12313, 2009). This work suggested that the amino terminus of gK may directly or indirectly interact with gB and/or other viral glycoproteins. Two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that UL20p interacted with gB in infected cells. Furthermore, the gKa peptide was coimmunoprecipitated with gB but not gD. Three recombinant baculoviruses were constructed, expressing the amino-terminal 82 aa of gKa together with either the extracellular portion of gB (30 to 748 aa), gD (1 to 340 aa), or gH (1 to 792 aa), respectively. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that gKa physically interacted with the extracellular portions of gB and gH but not gD. Three additional recombinant baculoviruses expressing gKa and truncated gBs encompassing aa 30 to 154, 30 to 364, and 30 to 500 were constructed. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that gKa physically interacted with all three truncated gBs. Computer-assisted prediction of possible gKa binding sites on gB suggested that gKa may interact predominantly with gB domain I (E. E. Heldwein, H. Lou, F. C. Bender, G. H. Cohen, R. J. Eisenberg, and S. C. Harrison, Science 313:217-220, 2006). These results imply that the gK/UL20p protein complex modulates the fusogenic properties of gB and gH via direct physical interactions.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) can enter into cells via the fusion of its viral envelope with cellular membranes. Also, the virus can spread from infected to uninfected cells by causing virus-induced cell fusion, allowing virions to enter into uninfected cells without being exposed to extracellular spaces. These membrane fusion phenomena are known to be mediated by viral glycoproteins and other viral proteins (reviewed in reference 36). Although wild-type viruses cause a limited amount of virus-induced cell fusion, certain mutations cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial, or syn, mutations). These syncytial mutations are located predominantly within the UL20 gene (5, 27, 28); the UL24 gene (25, 38); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein gB (7, 15, 18, 32); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (6, 11, 24, 34, 35, 37).The presence of syncytial mutations within different viral genes, as well as other accumulating evidence, suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action and interactions of the viral glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL as well as gK and the membrane protein UL20p. Specifically, recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2, 21). However, gB and gH/gL can also interact with each other even in the absence of gD (3). In this membrane fusion model, the binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including nectin-1, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), and other receptors (8, 19, 30, 39-42), is thought to trigger sequential conformational changes in gH/gL and gB causing the fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry as well as fusion among cellular membranes (22, 23). The transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (31, 43), suggesting that these four viral glycoproteins are necessary and sufficient for membrane fusion. However, this transient fusion system does not accurately depict virus-induced cell fusion. Specifically, viral glycoprotein K (gK) and the UL20 membrane protein (UL20p) have been shown to be strictly required for virus-induced cell fusion (10, 27, 29). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (6, 11, 24, 34, 35, 37) or UL20 (5, 27, 28) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than the wild-type virus into susceptible cells (17). In contrast, the transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while the coexpression of wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL was reported previously to inhibit cell fusion in certain cell lines (4). To date, there is no direct evidence that either gK or UL20p interacts with gB, gD, gH, or gL.The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of HSV-1 gB has been determined and was predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB (23). Single-amino-acid changes within the carboxyl terminus of gB located intracellularly as well as the deletion of the terminal 28 amino acids (aa) of gB cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion, presumably because they alter the extracellular conformation of gB (15, 31, 43). We have previously shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20p functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are absolutely necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport, cell surface expression, and functions in the HSV-1 life cycle (13, 16). In contrast to gB, syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (12), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p shown to be located intracellularly (27).Recently, we showed that the a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 amino acids of gK (gKa) can complement in trans for gB-mediated cell fusion caused by the deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB, suggesting that the gKa peptide interacted with gB or other viral glycoproteins involved in virus-induced cell fusion (10). In this work, we demonstrate that UL20p and the amino terminus of gKa physically interact with gB in infected cells, while the gKa peptide is also capable of binding to the extracellular portion of gH, suggesting that gK/UL20p modulates virus-induced cell fusion via direct interactions with gB and gH.     

Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein B Associates with Target Membranes via Its Fusion Loops

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins gB, gD, and gH/gL are necessary and sufficient for virus entry into cells. Structural features of gB are similar to those of vesicular stomatitis virus G and baculovirus gp64, and together they define the new class III group of fusion proteins. Previously, we used mutagenesis to show that three hydrophobic residues (W174, Y179, and A261) within the putative gB fusion loops are integral to gB function. Here we expanded our analysis, using site-directed mutagenesis of each residue in both gB fusion loops. Mutation of most of the nonpolar or hydrophobic amino acids (W174, F175, G176, Y179, and A261) had severe effects on gB function in cell-cell fusion and null virus complementation assays. Of the six charged amino acids, mutation of H263 or R264 also negatively affected gB function. To further analyze the mutants, we cloned the ectodomains of the W174R, Y179S, H263A, and R264A mutants into a baculovirus expression system and compared them with the wild-type (WT) form, gB730t. As shown previously, gB730t blocks virus entry into cells, suggesting that gB730t competes with virion gB for a cell receptor. All four mutant proteins retained this function, implying that fusion loop activity is separate from gB-receptor binding. However, unlike WT gB730t, the mutant proteins displayed reduced binding to cells and were either impaired or unable to bind naked, cholesterol-enriched liposomes, suggesting that it may be gB-lipid binding that is disrupted by the mutations. Furthermore, monoclonal antibodies with epitopes proximal to the fusion loops abrogated gB-liposome binding. Taken together, our data suggest that gB associates with lipid membranes via a fusion domain of key hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues and that this domain associates with lipid membranes during fusion.Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into cells requires four viral envelope glycoproteins (gB, gD, and the heterodimer gH/gL) as well as a cell surface gD receptor (reviewed in references 31, 42, 43, and 49). When gD binds its receptor, it undergoes conformational changes that are essential to activate the fusion machinery, gB and gH/gL. In addition to being essential for virus entry, both gH/gL and gB play important roles in primary fusion events that occur during egress of the capsid from the nuclei of infected cells (22). gB and gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery of all members of the Herpesviridae.The mechanisms by which gB and gH/gL function individually and in concert during fusion are topics of intense investigations. Peptides based on predicted heptad repeats in gH block virus entry and have the ability to bind and disrupt model membranes (24, 26, 27). In addition, gH/gL can achieve hemifusion of adjacent cells in the absence of other herpesvirus proteins (50). These studies imply that gH/gL has fusogenic properties. Previously, we showed that both virion gB and soluble wild-type (WT) gB (gB730t), but not gD or gH/gL, bind to cells and associate with lipid rafts (10). Like gH/gL, several synthetic gB peptides induced the fusion of large unilamellar vesicles and inhibited herpesvirus infection (23, 24). Thus, it appears that both gB and gH/gL may be fusion proteins, a theory strengthened by data showing that either gB or gH/gL is sufficient for membrane fusion during nuclear egress (22). Additionally, gB730t blocks virus entry into cells deficient in heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), suggesting that it competes with virion gB for an obligate cell surface receptor (9). A recent study suggested that paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor alpha (PILRα) may serve this role for at least some cell types (47).The crystal structure of gB is now known for both HSV type 1 (HSV-1) (32) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (6). Interestingly, gB is structurally related to two other viral fusion proteins, the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G protein (45) and the baculovirus gp64 protein (34). VSV G, gB, and most recently, baculovirus gp64 were placed into a newly formed group of fusion proteins, the class III proteins. Class III fusion proteins have similar individual domain structures and contain a central three-stranded coiled coil reminiscent of the class I proteins. Whereas class I proteins have an N-terminal fusion peptide, class III proteins have internal bipartite fusion loops within domain I (shown in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A for gB) which are similar to the single fusion loop of class II fusion proteins. However, the class II fusion loop is composed entirely of hydrophobic amino acids, whereas the fusion loops of gB have both hydrophobic and charged residues (32, 34, 45). Unlike G or gp64, which are the sole fusion proteins for their respective viruses, gB requires gH/gL to function in fusion and entry.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.HSV gB hydrophobic ridge is surrounded by charged residues on the surface of the molecule. A ribbon diagram of the HSV protomer (A) and molecular surface representation of the trimer (B) are shown. In each, one protomer is colored by secondary structure succession, using blue (domain I), green (domain II), yellow (domain III), orange (domain IV), and red (domain V). The box in panel A shows the primary amino acid sequences of the fusion loops. The box in panel B shows the base of the gB trimer, rotated 90°. For the boxes in both panels A and B, highlighted hydrophobic residues are colored in blue and charged residues are shown in red. All structural figures were generated, in part, using PyMOL Molecular Graphics System software.In our previous study, we used site-directed mutagenesis to show that three hydrophobic amino acids within the gB loops (W174, Y179, and A261) are essential for gB function (29). Similar studies of VSV G, gp64, and EBV gB support the notion that hydrophobic amino acids of both fusion loops are critical for fusion (34, 44, 51) and together constitute a fusion domain. Recently, bimolecular complementation was used to show that gB and gH/gL interact with each other concomitantly with fusion and that this interaction is triggered by binding of gD to its cellular receptor (3, 4). Thus, gB may function cooperatively with gH/gL, yet each may have some fusogenic potential on its own.The goal of the experiments reported here was twofold. First, we wanted to complete our mutagenic analysis of all of the residues in the two putative fusion loops of HSV gB. Our data show that the two fusion loops constitute a structural “subdomain” wherein key hydrophobic amino acids form a ridge that is supported on both sides by charged residues. We hypothesize that two charged residues on one side of the ridge enhance the ability of the hydrophobic residues to interact with target membranes and to function in fusion.Our second goal was to assess the effects of mutations in the fusion loops on the function of gB in cell binding, blocking of entry, and insertion into lipid membranes. Therefore, we constructed recombinant baculoviruses, with each carrying the gene for a truncated version (residues 31 to 730) of one of four mutant forms of gB (W174R, Y179S, H263A, and R264A). We found that the mutant proteins were able to efficiently block virus entry, suggesting that the fusion loops do not participate in protein-receptor binding. However, all four mutant proteins were impaired in cell binding compared to WT gB730t. Whereas WT gB730t associated with liposomes in a flotation assay, soluble truncated forms of HSV gD and gH/gL did not, consistent with our previous finding that gB730t associates with lipid rafts on cell surfaces (8). In contrast to WT gB730t, the gB mutant proteins were either impaired or unable to bind liposomes. Our data suggest that gB has an intrinsic ability to associate with a target membrane via its fusion domain.     

A Single-Amino-Acid Substitution in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Envelope Glycoprotein B at a Site Required for Binding to the Paired Immunoglobulin-Like Type 2 Receptor α (PILRα) Abrogates PILRα-Dependent Viral Entry and Reduces Pathogenesis

Paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α (PILRα) is a herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) entry receptor that associates with O-glycans on HSV-1 envelope glycoprotein B (gB). Two threonine residues (Thr-53 and Thr-480) in gB, which are required for the addition of the principal gB O-glycans, are essential for binding to soluble PILRα. However, the role of the two threonines in PILRα-dependent viral entry remains to be elucidated. Therefore, we constructed a recombinant HSV-1 carrying an alanine replacement of gB Thr-53 alone (gB-T53A) or of both gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 (gB-T53/480A) and demonstrated that these mutations abrogated viral entry in CHO cells expressing PILRα. In contrast, the mutations had no effect on viral entry in CHO cells expressing known host cell receptors for HSV-1 gD, viral entry in HL60 cells expressing myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) (another HSV-1 gB receptor), viral attachment to heparan sulfate, and viral replication in PILRα-negative cells. These results support the hypothesis that gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 as well as gB O-glycosylation, probably at these sites, are critical for PILRα-dependent viral entry. Interestingly, following corneal inoculation in mice, the gB-T53A and gB-T53/480A mutations significantly reduced viral replication in the cornea, the development of herpes stroma keratitis, and neuroinvasiveness. The abilities of HSV-1 to enter cells in a PILRα-dependent manner and to acquire specific carbohydrates on gB are therefore linked to an increase in viral replication and virulence in the experimental murine model.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) entry into host cells depends on interactions between cell surface receptors and HSV-1 virion envelope glycoproteins (39). Five of the 12 HSV-1 envelope glycoproteins that have been identified thus far (i.e., glycoprotein B [gB], gC, gD, gH, and gL) have roles in viral entry (39). Both gB and gC mediate virion attachment by interacting with cell surface glycosaminoglycan, primarily heparan sulfate (16, 17). Although not essential for entry, this step provides stable interactions between the virion and the cell that favor the next steps (39). These steps include gD binding to one of its identified receptors, i.e., herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, and specific sites on heparan sulfate 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (3-O-S-HS) generated by certain 3-O-sulfotransferases (3-O-STs) (14, 28, 38, 51). Subsequent fusion between the virion envelope and host cell membrane, which requires the cooperative function of gB, heterodimer gH/gL, gD, and a gD receptor, then produces nucleocapsid penetration into the cell (31, 46).In addition to the interaction of gD with a gD receptor, gB binding to a cellular receptor other than heparan sulfate has been suggested to mediate viral entry, based on the observation that a soluble form of gB binds to heparan sulfate-deficient cells and blocks HSV-1 infection of some cell lines (3). Consistent with this observation, we have reported that paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor α (PILRα) associates with gB and functions as an HSV-1 entry receptor (36). Viral entry via PILRα appears to be conserved among alphaherpesviruses, but there is a PILRα preference based on the observation that PILRα is able to mediate the entry of pseudorabies virus, a porcine alphaherpesvirus, but not of HSV-2 (1). Importantly, HSV-1 infection of human primary monocytes expressing both HVEM and PILRα was blocked by either an anti-PILRα or anti-HVEM antibody, suggesting that cellular receptors for both gD and gB are required for HSV-1 infection (36). However, CHO-K1 cells, which are resistant to HSV-1 infection, can become susceptible to HSV-1 entry and HSV-1-induced cell fusion after the overexpression of either a gD receptor, such as nectin-1, or PILRα (14, 36). It was thought that CHO-K1 cells express endogenously low levels of gB and gD receptors that allow the single overexpression of either a gB or gD receptor to support detectable levels of HSV-1 entry and HSV-1-induced cell fusion (36). More recently, myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), which has homology to PILRα, was also reported to serve as the gB receptor for HSV-1 and varicella-zoster virus (40). However, the importance of PILRα- or MAG-dependent viral entry in HSV-1 infection and pathogenesis in vivo remains to be elucidated.PILRα is one of the paired receptor families, in which one receptor has inhibitory functions and the other mediates activation functions, and is expressed mainly in immune system cells (13, 29). In addition, PILRα was previously reported to be expressed in certain types of cells in neural tissues (36). We previously identified one of the PILRα ligands as CD99 (37). Interestingly, PILRα recognition of CD99 is dependent on the addition of sialylated O-linked sugar chains at particular CD99 threonines (50). Similarly, we recently demonstrated that a specific sialylated O-glycan(s) on gB is critical for PILRα binding, based on observations that neuraminidase, which removes sialic acid, and benzyl-α-GalNAc treatment, which blocks O-glycan synthesis, inhibited gB binding to a soluble PILRα (49). More importantly, one (Thr-53) or both (Thr-53 and Thr-480) putative O-glycosylation sites identified by bioinformatics analysis are required for the binding of gB to soluble PILRα, and the replacement of both Thr-53 and Thr-480 with alanine significantly inhibited the addition of O-glycans to gB (49). These observations suggest that Thr-53 and Thr-480 in gB are O-glycosylated, and these sites, and probably the addition of specific carbohydrates to them, are required for the interaction of gB with PILRα. However, it remains uncertain whether gB Thr-53 and Thr-480, and probably the gB O-glycosylation of these sites, are required for PILRα-dependent viral entry in natural infections.In the present study, we have shown that the alanine replacement of gB Thr-53 (gB-T53A) alone or of both gB Thr-53 and Thr-480 (gB-T53/480A) significantly inhibited cell-cell fusion in CHO cells expressing PILRα, gB, gD, gH, and gL, whereas the mutations had no effect on cell-cell fusion in CHO cells expressing nectin-1, gB, gD, gH, and gL. Furthermore, we constructed recombinant HSV-1 carrying the gB-T53A and gB-T53/480A mutations and found that these mutations abrogated PILRα-dependent viral entry but had no effect on viral entry via known receptors for HSV-1 gD and MAG, viral attachment to heparan sulfate, and viral replication in PILRα-negative cells. We also tested these recombinant viruses in mice and present data showing that the mutations in gB significantly reduced viral replication, the development of herpes stromal keratitis (HSK), and neuroinvasiveness.     

A Human Cytomegalovirus gO-Null Mutant Fails To Incorporate gH/gL into the Virion Envelope and Is Unable To Enter Fibroblasts and Epithelial and Endothelial Cells

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) depends upon a five-protein complex, gH/gL/UL128-131, to enter epithelial and endothelial cells. A separate HCMV gH/gL-containing complex, gH/gL/gO, has been described. Our prevailing model is that gH/gL/UL128-131 is required for entry into biologically important epithelial and endothelial cells and that gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts. Genes encoding UL128-131 are rapidly mutated during laboratory propagation of HCMV on fibroblasts, apparently related to selective pressure for the fibroblast entry pathway. Arguing against this model in the accompanying paper by B. J. Ryckman et al. (J. Virol., 84:2597-2609, 2010), we describe evidence that clinical HCMV strain TR expresses a gO molecule that acts to promote endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export of gH/gL and that gO is not stably incorporated into the virus envelope. This was different from results involving fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which incorporates gO into the virion envelope. Here, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant, TRΔgO, that replicated to low titers, spread poorly among fibroblasts, but produced normal quantities of extracellular virus particles. TRΔgO particles released from fibroblasts failed to infect fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells, but the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG) could partially overcome defects in infection. Therefore, TRΔgO is defective for entry into all three cell types. Defects in entry were explained by observations showing that TRΔgO incorporated about 5% of the quantities of gH/gL in extracellular virus particles compared with that in wild-type virions. Although TRΔgO particles could not enter cells, cell-to-cell spread involving epithelial and endothelial cells was increased relative to TR, apparently resulting from increased quantities of gH/gL/UL128-131 in virions. Together, our data suggest that TR gO acts as a chaperone to promote ER export and the incorporation of gH/gL complexes into the HCMV envelope. Moreover, these data suggest that it is gH/gL, and not gH/gL/gO, that is present in virions and is required for infection of fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. Our observations that both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial/endothelial cells differ from models for other beta- and gammaherpesviruses that use one of two different gH/gL complexes to enter different cells.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infects a broad spectrum of cell types in vivo, including epithelial and endothelial cells, fibroblasts, monocyte-macrophages, dendritic cells, hepatocytes, neurons, glial cells, and leukocytes (6, 28, 36). Infection of this diverse spectrum of cell types contributes to the multiplicity of CMV-associated disease. HCMV infection of hepatocytes and epithelial cells in the gut and lungs following transplant immunosuppression is directly associated with CMV disease (3, 44). HCMV can be transported in the blood by monocyte-macrophages, and virus produced in these cells can infect endothelial cells, leading to virus spread into solid tissues such as the brain, liver, and lungs, etc. (16). Despite the broad spectrum of cells infected in vivo, propagation of HCMV in the laboratory is largely limited to normal human fibroblasts because other cells produce little virus. HCMV rapidly adapts to laboratory propagation in fibroblasts, losing the capacity to infect other cell types, i.e., epithelial and endothelial cells and monocyte-macrophages (9, 16, 18, 43). This adaptation to fibroblasts involves mutations in the unique long b′ (ULb′) region of the HCMV genome, which includes 22 genes (9). Targeted mutation of three of the ULb′ genes, UL128, UL130, and UL131, abolished HCMV infection of endothelial cells, transmission to leukocytes, and infection of dendritic cells (17, 18). Restoration of UL128-131 genes in HCMV laboratory strain AD169 (which cannot infect epithelial and endothelial cells) produced viruses capable of infecting these cells (18, 48). There is also evidence that the UL128-131 proteins are deleterious to HCMV replication in fibroblasts, resulting in rapid loss or mutation of one or more of the UL128-131 genes during passage in fibroblasts (2).A major step forward in understanding how the UL128-131 genes promote HCMV infection of epithelial and endothelial cells involved observations that the UL128-131 proteins assemble onto the extracellular domain of the membrane-anchored HCMV glycoprotein heterodimer gH/gL (1, 49). Antibodies to UL128, UL130, and UL131 each neutralized HCMV for infection of endothelial or epithelial cells (1, 49). All herpesviruses express gH/gL homologues and, where this has been tested, all depend upon gH/gL for replication and, more specifically, for entry into cells (14, 15, 31, 38). Indeed, we showed that the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex mediated entry into epithelial and endothelial cells (40). All five members of the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex were required for proper assembly and export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and for function (39, 41). In addition, the expression of gH/gL/UL128-131, but not gH/gL or gB, in epithelial cells interfered with HCMV entry into these cells (39). This interference suggested that there are saturable gH/gL/UL128-131 receptors present on epithelial cells, molecules that HCMV uses for entry. There was no interference in fibroblasts expressing gH/gL/UL128-131, although some interference was observed with gH/gL (39). As noted above, gH/gL/UL128-131 plays no obvious role in entry into fibroblasts and, in fact, appears to be deleterious in this respect (2, 18, 40).HCMV also expresses a second gH/gL complex, as follows: gH/gL/gO (20, 21, 22, 30, 48). Fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169 expresses a gO protein that is a 110- to 125-kDa glycoprotein (21). Pulse-chase studies suggest that gH/gL assembles first in the ER before binding and forming disulfide links with gO (21, 22). The 220-kDa immature gH/gL/gO complex is transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and increases in size to ∼280 to 300 kDa before incorporation into the virion envelope (21). gH/gL/gO complexes are apparently distinct from gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes because gO-specific antibodies do not detect complexes containing either UL128 or UL130 and UL128-specific antibodies do not precipitate gO (49). Towne and AD169 gO-null mutant laboratory strains can produce small plaques on fibroblasts, leading to the conclusion that gO is not essential. However, the AD169 and Towne mutants produced ∼1,000-fold less infectious virus than wild-type HCMV (14, 19), which might also be interpreted to mean that gO is very important or even essential for replication. Thus, the prevailing model has been that wild-type HCMV particles contain the following two gH/gL complexes: gH/gL/gO, which promotes infection of fibroblasts, and gH/gL/UL128-131, which promotes entry into epithelial and endothelial cells. Supporting this model, there are two different entry mechanisms, as follows: HCMV enters fibroblasts by fusion at the plasma membrane at neutral pH (12), whereas entry into epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis and a low pH-dependent fusion with endosomes (40). This model of HCMV entry parallels models for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) entry that use gH/gL to enter epithelial cells and gH/gL/gp42 to enter B cells (24). Similarly, HHV-6 uses gH/gL/gO and gH/gL/gQ, which bind to different receptors (33).Many of the studies of gH/gL/gO have involved the fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which fails to express UL131 and assemble gH/gL/UL128-131 or AD169 recombinants in which UL131 expression was restored (20, 21, 22, 48, 49). It seemed possible that the adaptation of AD169 to long-term passage in fibroblasts might also involve alterations in gO. HCMV gO is unusually variable (15 to 25% amino acid differences) among different HCMV strains compared with other viral genes (13, 34, 35, 37, 46). In recent studies, Jiang et al. (26) described a gO-null mutant derived from the HCMV strain TB40/E, a strain that can infect endothelial cells following extensive passage on these cells. The TB40/E gO-null mutant spread poorly on fibroblasts compared with wild-type TB40/E, and there was little infectious virus detected in fibroblast culture supernatants. However, the few TB40/E gO-null mutant particles produced by fibroblasts that could initiate infection of endothelial cells were able to spread to form normal-sized plaques on endothelial cells. These results further supported the model for which gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts but not for epithelial/endothelial cells. Those authors also concluded that gO is important for the assembly of enveloped particles in fibroblasts, based on observations of few infectious virus particles in supernatants and cytoplasmic accumulation of unenveloped capsids (26).Our studies of gH/gL/UL128-131 have involved the clinical HCMV strain TR (39, 40, 41, 47). HCMV TR was originally an ocular isolate from an AIDS patient (45) and was passaged only a few times on fibroblasts before being genetically frozen in the form of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (34, 40). HCMV TR infects epithelial and endothelial cells (40) and monocyte-macrophages (D. Streblow and J. Nelson, unpublished results) well. In the accompanying paper (42), we characterized the biochemistry and intracellular trafficking of TR gO. TR gO expressed either in TR-infected cells or by using adenovirus vectors (expressed without other HCMV proteins) was largely retained in the ER. Coexpression of gO with gH/gL promoted transport of gH/gL beyond the ER. Importantly, TR gO was not found in extracellular virions. In contrast, AD169 gO was present in extracellular virus particles, as described previously (20, 21). We concluded that TR gO is a chaperone that promotes ER export of the gH/gL complex, but gO dissociates prior to incorporation into the virus envelope. Moreover, these differences highlight major differences between gO molecules expressed by fibroblast-adapted strain AD169 and low-passage TR.To extend these results and characterize how TR gO functions, whether in virus entry or virus assembly/egress, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant. TRΔgO exhibited major defects in entering fibroblasts, as evidenced by increased virus infection following treatment with the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG). Unexpectedly, the mutant also failed to enter epithelial and endothelial cells, and again, PEG partially restored entry. Relatively normal numbers of TRΔgO particles were produced and released into cell culture supernatants, although even with PEG treatment, most of these virus particles remained defective in initiating immediate-early HCMV protein synthesis. Western blot analyses of TRΔgO extracellular particles demonstrated very low levels of gH/gL incorporated into virions, which likely explains the reduced entry of TRΔgO. However, the small amounts of gH/gL complexes that were present in TRΔgO virions were associated with increased quantities of UL130, and these TRΔgO particles spread better than wild-type HCMV on epithelial cell monolayers. Together with the results shown in the accompanying paper (42), we concluded that HCMV TR gO functions as a chaperone to promote ER export of gH/gL to HCMV assembly compartments and the incorporation of gH/gL into the virion envelope. The highly reduced quantities of gH/gL in virions are apparently responsible for the inability of HCMV to enter fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. These results suggest a modified version of our model, in which gH/gL, not gH/gL/gO, mediates entry into fibroblasts and both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.     

Insertional Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 gL Identify Functional Domains for Association with gH and for Membrane Fusion

Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion. This glycoprotein oligomerizes with gH to form a membrane-bound heterodimer but can be secreted when expressed without gH. Twelve unique gL linker-insertion mutants were generated to identify regions critical for gH binding and gH/gL processing and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. All gL mutants were detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting incomplete cleavage of the signal peptide or the presence of a cell surface receptor for secreted gL. Coexpression with gH enhanced the levels of cell surface gL detected by antibodies for all gL mutants except those that were defective in their interactions with gH. Two insertions into a conserved region of gL abrogated the binding of gL to gH and prevented gH expression on the cell surface. Three other insertions reduced the cell surface expression of gH and/or altered the properties of gH/gL heterodimers. Altered or absent interaction of gL with gH was correlated with reduced or absent cell fusion activity and impaired complementation of virion infectivity. These results identify a conserved domain of gL that is critical for its binding to gH and two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the conserved domain, that are critical for the gH/gL complex to perform its role in membrane fusion.Glycoprotein L (gL) is one of the four glycoproteins required for the entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells and for virus-induced cell fusion (26, 33). The others are gB, gD, and gH (30). The functional unit containing gL is a heterodimer formed with gH (gH/gL) (15). Because mature gL has no membrane-spanning domain, other than a cleavable signal peptide, it is secreted unless it is coexpressed with gH, a type 1 glycoprotein that anchors gL to the cell membrane (2). Also, gH is not properly processed or transported out of the endoplasmic reticulum unless it is coexpressed with gL (15).Most, if not all, herpesviruses express orthologs of gB, gH, and gL, which are believed to form the core membrane-fusing machinery necessary for viral entry and cell fusion. For some herpesviruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus, the gH/gL oligomer may contain additional viral subunits that can influence binding of the complex to cell receptors and determine cell tropism (14, 34, 35). For HSV, however, only gD and gB have been shown to have receptor-binding activities that are required for entry (27, 31). Although HSV gH has an RGD motif and the gH/gL heterodimer can bind to certain integrins, this binding seems not to be necessary for viral entry (3, 22).The initial interaction of HSV with cells can be the reversible attachment of virus to cell surface heparan sulfate, mediated by viral glycoprotein gB and/or gC (29). Then, gD can bind to one of its receptors, including herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family; nectin-1 or nectin-2, cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily; or specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by 3-O-sulfotransferases (31). In addition to binding to heparan sulfate, gB can also bind to other cell surface receptors, including paired immunoglobulin-like receptor alpha (PILRα) (27). Binding of both gD and gB to one of their respective receptors appears to be required for triggering the membrane-fusing activity of gB and/or gH/gL, which leads to viral entry.A recent X-ray structure of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB suggests that it is a class III viral fusogen similar in domain organization, but not primary sequence, to the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus (13). It has been proposed that HSV-1 gH has features characteristic of class I viral fusogens, such as putative heptad repeats and fusion peptides (6, 9-11). Also, peptides matching the sequence of gH can interact with lipids and/or induce the fusion of lipid vesicles (4, 5, 8). Hemifusion between cells and between virus and cell can be induced by gH/gL and gD in the absence of gB (32). Many questions remain about the respective roles of gH/gL and gB in inducing membrane fusion.The four conserved cysteines in gL were found to be essential for gL-gH association and function (1). Mutational analyses of gL by C-terminal deletions showed that the first 147 amino acids of gL are sufficient for association with gH but that the first 161 amino acids are necessary for cotransport of gH and gL to the cell surface (17, 23) and for gL activity in cell fusion and viral entry (17). Lastly, certain anti-gL monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) can inhibit cell fusion but not viral entry, despite demonstrable binding of the MAbs to virus, suggesting that gL may play a different role in each process (21). These MAbs were mapped to the C-terminal region of gL (21, 23). The diagram at the bottom of Fig. ​Fig.11 shows the locations of the gL features mentioned above and of the signal peptide.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of insertional mutations on HSV-1 gL and gH cell surface expression. CHO cells were transfected with plasmids expressing gH and WT gL or a gL mutant. Cell surface expression of gL and gH was quantified by CELISA using polyclonal R88 antiserum (filled circles) and MAb 52S (open triangles), respectively. A linear representation of the gL polypeptide is shown below the graph, with coded bars identifying features of gL. The bars represent the signal peptide (uncolored hatched), the N-terminal 161-amino-acid fragment necessary for the formation of functional gH/gL complexes (dark gray), highly conserved residues within this fragment (cross-hatched dark- gray bar), and epitopes recognized by a panel of anti-gL MAbs (light-gray and uncolored vertically striped bars). The values presented for cell surface expression of each mutant gL and of cotransfected WT gH are means from three independent experiments expressed as percentages of WT gL (or of gH cotransfected with WT gL) values, after subtraction of background values obtained in the absence of gL expression and as a function of the position of the insertion. Standard deviations are presented in Fig. ​Fig.22 and ​and33 for similar experiments.The interactions between gL and gH required for proper intracellular transport, processing, and cell surface expression make it difficult to investigate the functional role of one of these glycoproteins in cell fusion and viral entry independently of the other. We generated a panel of gL linker-insertion mutants to identify regions critical for gH binding and transport and regions essential for cell fusion and viral entry. One aim was to determine whether these roles of gL could be dissociated or were linked. Characterization of 12 unique gL linker-insertion mutants showed that (i) a conserved domain of gL is critical for the physical interaction of gL with gH and for the normal processing of gH, (ii) two noncontiguous regions of gL, one of which contains the highly conserved domain, are critical for the normal conformation and function of gH/gL heterodimers, and (iii) wild-type (WT) and mutant gLs can be detected on the cell surface in the absence of gH, suggesting the possibility of an independent role for uncomplexed gL. These results support and extend previous studies suggesting that gL has a larger role in membrane fusion than serving as a chaperone for gH and that specific mutations in gL can influence the function of the gH/gL heterodimer.     

Functional Analysis of Glycoprotein L (gL) from Rhesus Lymphocryptovirus in Epstein-Barr Virus-Mediated Cell Fusion Indicates a Direct Role of gL in gB-Induced Membrane Fusion

Glycoprotein L (gL), which complexes with gH, is a conserved herpesvirus protein that is essential for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) entry into host cells. The gH/gL complex has a conserved role in entry among herpesviruses, yet the mechanism is not clear. To gain a better understanding of the role of gL in EBV-mediated fusion, chimeric proteins were made using rhesus lymphocryptovirus (Rh-LCV) gL (Rh gL), which shares a high sequence homology with EBV gL but does not complement EBV gL in mediating fusion with B cells. A reduction in fusion activity was observed with chimeric gL proteins that contained the amino terminus of Rh gL, although they retained their ability to process and transport gH/gL to the cell surface. Amino acids not conserved within this region in EBV gL when compared to Rh gL were further analyzed, with the results mapping residues 54 and 94 as being functionally important for EBV-mediated fusion. All chimeras and mutants displayed levels of cell surface expression similar to that of wild-type gL and interacted with gH and gp42. Our data also suggest that the role of gL involves the activation or recruitment of gB with the gH/gL complex, as we found that reduced fusion of Rh gL, EBV/Rh-LCV chimeras, and gL point mutants could be restored by replacing EBV gB with Rh gB. These observations demonstrate a distinction between the role of gL in the processing and trafficking of gH to the cell surface and a posttrafficking role in cell-cell fusion.Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a member of the lymphocryptovirus (LCV) subgroup of gammaherpesviruses and primarily infects epithelial and B lymphocytes, where it establishes productive and latent infections, respectively (8, 40). EBV is extremely prevalent in humans, with more than 90% of the population being infected. Following primary infection, EBV persists in a latent state in memory B lymphocytes, where it can remain indefinitely (3, 43). The expansion and proliferation of these cells can lead to the development of a number of EBV-related malignancies, including tumors of lymphoid tissues, such as Hodgkin''s lymphoma, Burkitt''s lymphoma, and some T-cell lymphomas, as well as tumors associated with epithelial tissues, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric carcinoma (5, 32, 36, 48). EBV is also associated with lymphoproliferative disorders in immunocompromised patients, such as oral hairy leukoplakia and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (12, 15, 43, 45).Herpesvirus entry is a multistep process that includes the initial binding of the virus to the cell surface, interaction with a cellular entry receptor, membrane-virion fusion, and internalization of the virion (40). The enveloped membrane of EBV contains numerous glycoproteins that are necessary for mediating attachment and the subsequent fusion between viral and cell membranes, although the required glycoproteins differ for epithelial and B-cell infection (13, 22). Infection of B cells is initiated upon the binding of EBV glycoprotein gp350/220 to the CD21/CR2 cellular receptor expressed on target cells (9, 27, 41). Following the initial binding, viral glycoprotein gp42 binds to human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA class II) and triggers fusion, which is mediated by the concerted actions of glycoproteins gB, gH, and gL (21, 41). Glycoproteins gH and gL form a heteromeric complex that is conserved among the herpesvirus family despite a low degree of sequence homology in gH and gL across herpesviruses (33, 40). The gH/gL complex has an essential role in entry of herpesviruses, yet the exact role of each protein is not well understood. The role of gH is thought to be in cell fusion, while gL mediates processing and transport of gH to the cell surface (34, 35, 47, 51). Since gL is generally essential for the proper processing and transport of gH in all herpesviruses, it has been difficult to examine the role of gL separate from gH.While little is known about the role of gL in EBV-mediated fusion, data from studies of other herpesviruses have suggested a more direct role of gL in fusion. Antibodies specific for the C terminus of herpes simplex virus (HSV) gL, mapped to residues 168 to 224, were found to inhibit fusion with some strains of HSV type 1 (HSV-1), suggesting a role of this region in fusion (28). Deletion analysis of HSV-1 gL determined that the first 161 amino acids of gL are sufficient for binding gH, and further deletion identified the region between amino acids 155 and 161 of HSV-1 gL as critical for gH transport and cell fusion (19, 20, 33). Together, the results of these studies suggest that the inhibition of fusion observed with gL antibodies (Abs) is not due to an inhibition of gH/gL complex formation. Another study found that mutations to the amino-terminal region of HSV-2 gH permitted transport of the glycoprotein to the cell surface independent of gL but that gL was still required for fusion, suggesting a role of gL in fusion after the complex has trafficked to the plasma membrane (6). Most recently, the results of an investigation of the functional homology of the primate rhesus LCV (Rh-LCV) gL (Rh gL) suggest that gL may have a functional role in EBV fusion with B cells. Rh gL shares a high degree of sequence similarity with EBV (81.6%), and yet, the glycoprotein was unable to mediate fusion with human B cells when expressed with either EBV gH or Rh gH, even though the gH/gL complex was detected on the cell surface and Rh gL could associate with gH and gp42 (31). The LCV that infects rhesus primates is biologically similar to EBV in that it shares a similar genome organization, repertoire of lytic and latent genes, and pathogenesis (7, 25, 37, 46).To gain a better understanding of the role of gL in EBV-mediated fusion with B cells, we constructed chimeric gL proteins that included portions of Rh gL inserted into the sequence of EBV gL. We identified the amino terminus of EBV gL as being functionally necessary in mediating fusion with B cells, and this role is distinguishable from the role of gL in the processing and transport of gH to the cell surface. Single and double point mutations were constructed in both EBV and Rh gL, and our results indicated that residues 54 and 94 are functionally critical in mediating fusion with B cells. Interestingly, our studies also identified a species-specific reliance between gL and gB, suggesting a possible association between these two glycoproteins that is necessary in mediating fusion. Thus, our studies demonstrated that EBV gL has a more substantial role in mediating fusion with B cells that is distinct from its role in the processing and trafficking of gH.     

Differential Effects on Cell Fusion Activity of Mutations in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein B (gB) Dependent on Whether a gD Receptor or a gB Receptor Is Overexpressed

Glycoprotein B (gB) of herpes simplex virus (HSV) is one of four glycoproteins essential for viral entry and cell fusion. Recently, paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) was identified as a receptor for HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB. Both PILRα and a gD receptor were shown to participate in HSV-1 entry into certain cell types. The purpose of this study was to determine whether insertional mutations in gB had differential effects on its function with PILRα and the gD receptor, nectin-1. Previously described gB mutants and additional newly characterized mutants were used in this study. We found that insertional mutations near the N terminus and C terminus of gB and especially in the central region of the ectodomain reduced cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed much more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed. Most of the insertions reduced the binding of gB to PILRα, for at least some forms of gB, but this reduction did not necessarily correlate with the selective reduction in cell fusion activity with PILRα. These results suggest that the regions targeted by the relevant mutations are critical for functional activity with PILRα. They also suggest that, although both the binding of gB to a gB receptor and the binding of gD to a gD receptor may be required for HSV-induced cell fusion, the two receptor-binding activities may have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.Manifestations of disease caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) include recurrent mucocutaneous lesions in the mouth or on the face or genitalia and, more rarely, meningitis or encephalitis. The infection of host cells occurs by the fusion of the virion envelope with a cell membrane to deliver the nucleocapsid containing the viral genome into the host cell. This entry process and virus-induced cell fusion require glycoprotein B (gB), along with gD, gH, and gL. The membrane-fusing activity of HSV depends in part on the binding of gD to one of its receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, nectin-2, or 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (18). HVEM is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family and is expressed by cells of the immune system, as well as many other cell types, such as epithelial, stromal, and endothelial cells (23). Nectin-1 and nectin-2 are cell adhesion molecules belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily and are widely expressed by a variety of cell types, including epithelial cells and neurons (20). Specific sites in heparan sulfate generated by particular 3-O-sulfotransferases can serve as gD-binding entry receptors (17). This binding of gD to a receptor is associated with conformational changes in gD that are thought to enable gD to interact with gB and/or the heterodimer gH-gL to trigger fusogenic activity (8, 12). Both gB and gH have properties of fusogenic viral proteins (1, 7). Although evidence has been presented that gD and gH-gL are sufficient for hemifusion and that gB, in addition, is required for fusion pore formation (19), the specific roles each plays in HSV-induced membrane fusion have not been fully defined.gB was recently discovered to bind to paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILRα) in an interaction that can mediate viral entry and cell fusion, provided that gD also binds to one of its receptors (14). For cells such as CD14⁺ monocytes, antibodies specific for either HVEM or PILRα were shown to block HSV entry. Also, entry requires the presence of both gD and gB in the virion. Although the overexpression of either a gD receptor or a gB receptor can enhance the susceptibility of cells to HSV entry and HSV-induced cell fusion, there are very few, if any, cell types that do not express at least low levels of endogenous receptors. Thus, the possibility exists that these endogenous receptors are cooperating with the introduced receptors to render the cells susceptible to HSV-induced membrane fusion.PILRα belongs to the paired-receptor families, which consist of activating and inhibitory receptors (4, 11, 19). They are conserved among mammals (24). The inhibitory form PILRα has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif in its cytoplasmic domain and transduces inhibitory signals (4). On the other hand, the activating form PILRβ associates with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-bearing DAP12 adaptor molecule and delivers activating signals (16). Both PILRα and PILRβ are expressed on cells of the immune system, especially monocytes, dendritic cells, and NK cells (4, 11, 19), and also in neurons (14). CD99 has been identified as a natural ligand for both PILRα and PILRβ (16). The binding of either PILRα or PILRβ to CD99 depends on the presence of sialyated O-linked glycans on CD99 (22).In addition to binding to PILRα, gB can bind to heparin and heparan sulfate and may contribute, along with gC, to the binding of HSV to cell surface heparan sulfate (17). Also, gB and gC can bind to DC-SIGN, which serves as a binding receptor for the infection of dendritic cells (2). An X-ray structure of the HSV-1 gB ectodomain reveals a homotrimeric conformation with structural homology to vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G glycoprotein, the single glycoprotein responsible for the entry of VSV. Both HSV-1 gB and VSV G glycoprotein have features of class 1 and class 2 viral fusion proteins and have been designated class 3 fusion proteins (7, 14, 15). The heparan sulfate-binding determinant of gB has been localized to a lysine-rich domain in the N terminus and shown to be dispensable for viral entry (9). It lies within a region that is probably disordered and was not included in the defined coordinates of the X-ray structure. The binding of DC-SIGN to gB probably depends on high-mannose N-glycans of gB (6).In a previous study (10), 81 insertion mutants of HSV-1 gB were characterized to assess the effects of the insertions on protein processing and function in cell fusion with gD receptors, in relation to structural domains of gB identified in an X-ray structure (7). Only 27 mutants were found to be processed into mature glycosylated forms and transported to the cell surface. Only 11 of these retained fusion activity toward target cells expressing nectin-1 or HVEM. For the present study, we used 25 previously described gB insertion mutants shown to be expressed on cell surfaces and also identified an additional 10 such mutants.The present study was designed to determine whether the effects of insertions in gB on cell fusion activity would be dependent on whether a gD receptor (nectin-1) or a gB receptor (PILRα) was overexpressed in target cells that also expressed unidentified weak endogenous receptors. In addition, we assessed the abilities of the gB mutants to bind to PILRα. Our results showed that some insertions inhibited cell fusion activity when PILRα was overexpressed significantly more than when nectin-1 was overexpressed, but without necessarily preventing the binding of PILRα to gB, at least to some stable oligomeric forms of gB. The results indicate that, although both a gB receptor and a gD receptor may be required for cell fusion activity, the two receptor-binding activities have unequal weights in triggering fusogenic activity, depending on the ratios of gB and gD receptors or other factors.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Mapping the N-Terminal Residues of Epstein-Barr Virus gp42 That Bind gH/gL by Using Fluorescence Polarization and Cell-Based Fusion Assays

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) requires at a minimum membrane-associated glycoproteins gB, gH, and gL for entry into host cells. B-cell entry additionally requires gp42, which binds to gH/gL and triggers viral entry into B cells. The presence of soluble gp42 inhibits membrane fusion with epithelial cells by forming a stable heterotrimer of gH/gL/gp42. The interaction of gp42 with gH/gL has been previously mapped to residues 36 to 81 at the N-terminal region of gp42. In this study, we further mapped this region to identify essential features for binding to gH/gL by use of synthetic peptides. Data from fluorescence polarization, cell-cell fusion, and viral infection assays demonstrated that 33 residues corresponding to 44 to 61 and 67 to 81 of gp42 were indispensable for maintaining low-nanomolar-concentration gH/gL binding affinity and inhibiting B-cell fusion and epithelial cell fusion as well as viral infection. Overall, specific, large hydrophobic side chain residues of gp42 appeared to provide critical interactions, determining the binding strength. Mutations of these residues also diminished the inhibition of B-cell and epithelial cell fusions as well as EBV infection. A linker region (residues 62 to 66) between two gH/gL binding regions served as an important spacer, but individual amino acids were not critical for gH/gL binding. Probing the binding site of gH/gL and gp42 with gp42 peptides is critical for a better understanding of the interaction of gH/gL with gp42 as well as for the design of novel entry inhibitors of EBV and related human herpesviruses.Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a large DNA virus belonging to the family of gammaherpesviruses. The virus is transmitted through saliva, and it can infect epithelial cells, as well as B cells, which provide the host latency reservoir (1, 22). Reactivation of the virus can occur intermittently, allowing virus infection of new hosts (1). Viral reactivation from latency is quickly controlled by the immune system. Primary infection with EBV can lead to the development of infectious mononucleosis. In addition, EBV infection is associated with a variety of human cancers, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin''s lymphoma, and Burkitt''s lymphoma (4, 8, 9, 27, 30). EBV is an enveloped virus which contains a number of membrane glycoproteins required for membrane fusion and viral entry into the host cell. EBV-mediated entry into epithelial cells requires the three viral glycoproteins gB, gH, and gL, which are conserved among herpesviruses, and entry into B cells additionally requires the viral glycoprotein gp42 (7, 16, 17). EBV lacking gp42 can attach to B cells but cannot enter them (29). However, EBV lacking gp42 can still efficiently infect epithelial cells. In fact, gp42 acts as an inhibitor of epithelial cell infection, and recent studies suggest that the level of gp42 in the virion regulates whether EBV preferentially infects epithelial cells or B cells (2). EBV gp42 has been shown to play an essential role in membrane fusion with B cells (7, 16, 17). It binds to human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA class II) proteins expressed on B cells to trigger virus-cell membrane fusion (6, 7, 10, 16, 25).Interestingly, EBV gp42 occurs in two forms in infected cells, a full-length membrane-bound form and a soluble form generated by proteolytic cleavage that is secreted from infected cells due to loss of the N-terminal transmembrane domain (21). Both the full-length form and the secreted gp42 form bind to gH/gL and HLA class II, and the functional significance of gp42 cleavage is not completely clear. In a virus-free cell-cell fusion assay, enhanced secretion of gp42 promotes fusion with B lymphocytes. Cleavage and secretion of gp42 are necessary for membrane fusion with B lymphocytes (24). However, membrane fusion with epithelial cells is inhibited by the presence of gp42 for both virus infection and cell-cell fusion (14, 29). This is likely due to the formation of a heterotrimeric gH/gL/gp42 complex that is unable to mediate membrane fusion with epithelial cells, possibly due to steric hindrance of gH/gL receptor binding (3, 11).The interaction of gH/gL and gp42 plays a key role in membrane fusion, but it has not yet been fully understood. The crystal structures of a gH/gL/gp42 complex and gH/gL alone have not been available. Although the crystal structures of gp42 alone and gp42/HLA class II complex have been solved (15, 19), the N-terminal region of gp42 (bound to gH/gL) is not visible in the structures, most likely due to its flexibility. Previous studies have shown that the N-terminal region of gp42 contains multiple functional regions, including a cleavage site that results in the secretion of gp42, a potential homodimerization region, and two segments (15 residues each) required for gH/gL binding (Fig. ​(Fig.11 A) (13, 14). Extensive gp42 N-terminal deletion analysis demonstrated that residues 37 to 56 and 72 to 96 include functional regions of the N terminus of gp42 required to trigger fusion and suggested that some of the residues within residues 67 to 71 are also important. Additional experiments showed that amino acids within segments from residues 47 to 61 and 67 to 81 are critical for binding gH/gL (13). Those two segments are spaced by five residues, which appear to act as a linker. Previous studies also showed that a 46-mer peptide spanning residues 36 to 81, mimicking the full-length gp42, binds to gH/gL and inhibits the formation of gH/gL/gp42 complex, thus blocking membrane fusion with epithelial cells and fusion with B cells (13, 14).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic representation of EBV gp42. (A) Representation of wild-type gp42 showing the relative locations of known functional domains. The transmembrane domain is predicted to span residues 9 to 22 and is shown as a gray box. The site of gp42 cleavage is between residues 40 and 42 and is indicated by a black bar. The two gH/gL binding regions, spanning residues 47 to 61 and 67 to 87, are indicted with hatched boxes, flanking the five-residue linker. The C-terminal C-type lectin domain, including the hydrophobic pocket and HLA class II-binding region, is indicated by cross-hatched boxes. The putative dimerization region is indicated by a dotted box. (B) Amino acid sequence of gp42 peptide spanning residues 36 to 81 of the gp42 protein.In order to obtain a better understanding of the interaction of gp42 with gH/gL, and the role of this interaction in membrane fusion, we probed the gH/gL binding site by using 27 synthetic peptide analogs spanning residues 36 to 81 of gp42. Peptides were tested for binding affinity to soluble gH/gL by using a fluorescence polarization (FP) assay, probed for inhibition of B-cell and epithelial cell fusion in cell-based assays, and finally investigated for their ability to block epithelial cell infection. The data from the FP assay agreed very well with cell-cell fusion data and infection data, providing correlative data for peptide binding affinity and inhibition of cell-cell fusion and infection in an apparent competitive manner. We have defined the minimal length requirements for high-affinity binding to gH/gL and obtained a more detailed map of the key amino acids of the gp42 N terminus that are necessary for optimal gH/gL binding and inhibition of epithelial cell and B-cell membrane fusion.     

Human Cytomegalovirus TR Strain Glycoprotein O Acts as a Chaperone Promoting gH/gL Incorporation into Virions but Is Not Present in Virions

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) produces the following two gH/gL complexes: gH/gL/gO and gH/gL/UL128-131. Entry into epithelial and endothelial cells requires gH/gL/UL128-131, and we have provided evidence that gH/gL/UL128-131 binds saturable epithelial cell receptors to mediate entry. HCMV does not require gH/gL/UL128-131 to enter fibroblasts, and laboratory adaptation to fibroblasts results in mutations in the UL128-131 genes, abolishing infection of epithelial and endothelial cells. HCMV gO-null mutants produce very small plaques on fibroblasts yet can spread on endothelial cells. Thus, one prevailing model suggests that gH/gL/gO mediates infection of fibroblasts, while gH/gL/UL128-131 mediates entry into epithelial/endothelial cells. Most biochemical studies of gO have involved the HCMV lab strain AD169, which does not assemble gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes. We examined gO produced by the low-passage clinical HCMV strain TR. Surprisingly, TR gO was not detected in purified extracellular virus particles. In TR-infected cells, gO remained sensitive to endoglycosidase H, suggesting that the protein was not exported from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, TR gO interacted with gH/gL in the ER and promoted export of gH/gL from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. Pulse-chase experiments showed that a fraction of gO remained bound to gH/gL for relatively long periods, but gO eventually dissociated or was degraded and was not found in extracellular virions or secreted from cells. The accompanying report by P. T. Wille et al. (J. Virol., 84:2585-2596, 2010) showed that a TR gO-null mutant failed to incorporate gH/gL into virions and that the mutant was unable to enter fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. We concluded that gO acts as a molecular chaperone, increasing gH/gL ER export and incorporation into virions. It appears that gO competes with UL128-131 for binding onto gH/gL but is released from gH/gL, so that gH/gL (lacking UL128-131) is incorporated into virions. Thus, our revised model suggests that both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infects many different cell types in vivo, including epithelial and endothelial cells, fibroblasts, monocyte-macrophages, smooth muscle cells, dendritic cells, hepatocytes, neurons, glial cells, and leukocytes (reviewed in references 5, 30, 38, and 45). In the laboratory, HCMV is normally propagated in primary human fibroblasts because most other cell types yield low titers of virus. Commonly studied laboratory strains, such as AD169, were propagated extensively in fibroblasts, and this was accompanied by deletions or mutations in a cluster of 22 genes known as ULb′ (6). These mutations were correlated with the inability to infect other cell types, including endothelial and epithelial cells and monocyte-macrophages. Targeted mutagenesis of three of the ULb′ genes, UL128, UL130, and UL131, abolished infection of endothelial cells, transmission to leukocytes, and infection of dendritic cells (13, 15). Restoration of the UL128-131 genes in laboratory strains of HCMV strains restored the capacity to infect endothelial and epithelial cells and other cells (15, 52).The UL128, UL130, and UL131 proteins assemble onto the extracellular domain of HCMV gH/gL (1, 42, 53). For all herpesviruses, gH/gL complexes mediate entry into cells (12, 33, 39), suggesting that gH/gL/UL128-131 might participate in the entry mechanism. Indeed, we demonstrated that gH/gL/UL128-131 mediates entry into epithelial and endothelial cells by using the fusogenic agent polyethylene glycol to force entry of HCMV UL128-131 mutants into these cell types (41). This was consistent with reports that UL128-, UL130-, and UL131-specific antibodies blocked the capacity of HCMV to infect epithelial and endothelial cells but not fibroblasts (1, 53). Furthermore, expression of gH/gL/UL128-131, but not gH/gL or gB, in epithelial cells interfered with HCMV infection, consistent with saturable gH/gL/UL128-131 receptors (40). Expression of all five proteins was necessary so that the gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes were exported from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and could function (40-42, 53). Together, these data suggested that gH/gL/UL128-131 mediates entry into epithelial/endothelial cells but is not required for entry into fibroblasts. By extension, it was reasonable to propose that other forms of gH/gL might facilitate the entry into fibroblasts.The laboratory HCMV strain AD169 is known to express a second gH/gL complex containing glycoprotein O (gO) (21-23, 53). In cells infected with a recombinant AD169 in which the UL131 mutation was repaired, gH/gL/gO complexes were separate from gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes, i.e., gO was not detected following immunoprecipitation (IP) with UL128- and UL130-specifc antibodies, and gO-specific antibodies did not precipitate UL128 and UL130 (53). AD169 and Towne gO⁻ mutants produce small plaques on fibroblast monolayers and low titers of virus, supporting an important, although not essential, role for gH/gL/gO in virus replication in fibroblasts (11, 19). AD169 does not infect endothelial and epithelial cells, so AD169 gO⁻ mutants were not tested on these cells. Jiang et al. described a gO-null mutant derived from an endotheliotropic HCMV strain, TB40/E (27). The TB40/E gO-null mutant spread normally on endothelial cells, suggesting that gO or gH/gL/gO is less important for infection and spread in these cells. Given that the role of gH/gL in entry is highly conserved among the herpesviruses, it seemed likely that gH/gL/gO might be involved in entry into fibroblasts. Consistent with this notion, Paterson et al. showed that anti-gO antibodies decreased fusion from without caused by infection of cells with HCMV AD169 (37). These observations supported our working model in which gH/gL/UL128-131 mediates entry into epithelial and endothelial cells, while gH/gL/gO mediates entry into fibroblasts. There is also the possibility that gH/gL (lacking gO and UL128-131) might be incorporated into the virion envelope, although there is presently no direct evidence for this. Any gH/gL detected biochemically might result from dissociation of gO or UL128-131 during sample preparation and analysis. gH/gL expressed without other HCMV proteins was retained in the ER (42), arguing against incorporation into the virion.Other herpesviruses, e.g., Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), and HHV-7, use different forms of gH/gL to enter different cell types via different pathways (25, 34, 43). Similarly, HCMV entry into fibroblasts occurs by fusion at the plasma membrane at a neutral pH and does not require gH/gL/UL128-131 (7), whereas entry into epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis and low pH-dependent fusion and requires gH/gL/UL128-131 (41).All of the biochemical analyses of gO in terms of binding to gH/gL and intracellular transport have involved fibroblast-adapted strain AD169 (21-23, 31, 53). These studies indicated that gO is a 110- to 125-kDa glycoprotein encoded by the UL74 gene (22). Glycosidase digestion experiments demonstrated that the gO polypeptide chain is ∼62 to 65 kDa (21-23, 53). Pulse-chase studies showed that gH/gL assembles in the ER as a disulfide-linked heterodimer (28) that subsequently binds to, and establishes disulfides with, gO (22, 23). The 220-kDa immature gH/gL/gO trimer is initially sensitive to endoglycosidase H (endo H), which removes immature N-linked oligosaccharides from glycoproteins present in the ER (22, 23). Transport of gH/gL/gO to the Golgi apparatus is associated with processing of N-linked oligosaccharides to mature forms that resist endo H. Also associated with transport to the Golgi apparatus is the addition of O-linked oligosaccharides and phosphorylation, increasing the molecular weight of gO (after reduction) to 125 to 130 kDa and that of the gH/gL/gO complex to 240 to 260 kDa (22, 23, 29). It is the mature glycoprotein complex, previously known as gCIII, that is trafficked to HCMV assembly compartments for incorporation into the virion envelope (22, 23, 29).In addressing the function of gO, it is important to recognize that AD169 has adapted to replication in fibroblasts, losing expression of UL131 and failing to assemble gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes (6) (15). There seems to be strong pressure to mutate UL128-131, because clinical strain Merlin acquired a UL128 mutation within 5 passages on fibroblasts (2). It is also reasonable to suggest that fibroblast adaptation includes changes in gO. The gO genes (UL74) of several laboratory and clinical strains and clinical isolates are highly variable (up to 25% of amino acids) (10, 35, 37, 47). However, it is important to note that AD169-derived UL131-repair virus can infect epithelial and endothelial cells (52). Thus, if AD169 gO is important for infection of these cells, then gO must be functionally normal in this regard. These differences in laboratory versus clinical HCMV prompted us to characterize the gO molecule expressed by the HCMV strain TR. HCMV TR is a clinical isolate that was stabilized in the form of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) after very limited passage in fibroblasts (35, 41). HCMV TR expresses gH/gL/UL128-131 (42) and infects epithelial and endothelial cells (41) and monocyte-macrophages well (D. Streblow and J. Nelson, unpublished results).Here, we report our biochemical and cell trafficking analyses of the TR gO protein. We were surprised to find that TR gO was not present in extracellular virus particles. In contrast, gO was detected in extracellular AD169 particles, consistent with previous findings (22). TR gO expressed either in HCMV-infected cells or by using nonreplicating Ad vectors (expressed without other HCMV proteins) was largely retained in the ER. Coexpression of TR gO with gH/gL promoted transport of gH/gL beyond the ER, and gO was slowly lost from gH/gL complexes but not secreted from cells and not observed in extracellular virus particles. Thus, TR gO acts as a chaperone. Consistent with this, in the accompanying paper by Wille et al. (54), a TR gO-null mutant was described that secreted extracellular particles containing markedly reduced quantities of gH and gL. The gO⁻ mutant failed to enter fibroblasts and also epithelial and endothelial cells. Together, these results suggest that it is gH/gL, not gH/gL/gO, which is incorporated into HCMV TR virions. It appears that gH/gL is required for entry into fibroblasts, and both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.     

Low pH-Induced Conformational Change in Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein B

Herpesviruses can enter host cells using pH-dependent endocytosis pathways in a cell-specific manner. Envelope glycoprotein B (gB) is conserved among all herpesviruses and is a critical component of the complex that mediates membrane fusion and entry. Here we demonstrate that mildly acidic pH triggers specific conformational changes in herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB. The antigenic structure of gB was specifically altered by exposure to low pH both in vitro and during entry into host cells. The oligomeric conformation of gB was altered at a similar pH range. Exposure to acid pH appeared to convert virion gB into a lower-order oligomer. The detected conformational changes were reversible, similar to those in other class III fusion proteins. Exposure of purified, recombinant gB to mildly acidic pH resulted in similar changes in conformation and caused gB to become more hydrophobic, suggesting that low pH directly affects gB. We propose that intracellular low pH induces alterations in gB conformation that, together with additional triggers such as receptor binding, are essential for virion-cell fusion during herpesviral entry by endocytosis.Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is an important human pathogen, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. HSV enters host cells by fusion of the viral envelope with either an endosomal membrane (38) or the plasma membrane (63). The entry pathway taken is thought to be determined by both virus (17, 45) and host cell (4, 17, 35, 39, 45) factors. Based on experiments with lysosomotropic agents, which elevate the normally low pH of endosomes, acidic pH has been implicated in the endocytic entry of HSV into several cell types, including human epithelial cells (37). Low pH has also recently been implicated in cell infection by several other human and veterinary herpesviruses (1, 21, 26, 47). The mechanistic role of endosomal pH in herpesvirus entry into cells is not known.Herpesviruses are a paradigm for membrane fusion mediated by a complex of several glycoproteins. We have proposed that HSV likely encodes machinery to mediate both pH-dependent and pH-independent membrane fusion reactions. Envelope glycoproteins glycoprotein B (gB) and gD and the heterodimer gH-gL are required for both pH-independent and pH-dependent entry pathways (11, 22, 30, 39, 46). Interaction of gD with one of its cognate receptors is an essential trigger for membrane fusion and entry (13, 52), regardless of the cellular pathway. However, engagement of a gD receptor is not sufficient for fusion, and at least one additional unknown trigger involving gB or gH-gL is likely necessary. gB is conserved among all herpesviruses, and in all cases studied to date, it plays roles in viral entry, including receptor binding and membrane fusion. The crystal structure of an ectodomain fragment of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB is an elongated, rod-like structure containing hydrophobic internal fusion loops (28). This structure bears striking architectural homology to the low pH, postfusion form of G glycoprotein from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) (43). Both the gB and G structures have features of class I and class II fusion proteins and are thus designated class III proteins (57).During entry of the majority of virus families, low pH acts directly on glycoproteins to induce membrane fusion (60). In some cases, the low pH trigger is not sufficient, or it plays an indirect role. For example, host cell proteases, such as cathepsins D and L, require intravesicular low pH to cleave Ebola virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) glycoproteins to trigger fusion (14, 51).We investigated the role of low pH in the molecular mechanism of herpesviral entry. The results suggest that mildly acidic pH, similar to that found within endosomes, triggers a conformational change in gB. We propose that, together with other cellular cues such as receptor interaction, intracellular low pH can play a direct activating role in HSV membrane fusion and entry.     

The UL31 and UL34 Gene Products of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Are Required for Optimal Localization of Viral Glycoproteins D and M to the Inner Nuclear Membranes of Infected Cells

U_L31 and U_L34 of herpes simplex virus type 1 form a complex necessary for nucleocapsid budding at the inner nuclear membrane (INM). Previous examination by immunogold electron microscopy and electron tomography showed that pU_L31, pU_L34, and glycoproteins D and M are recruited to perinuclear virions and densely staining regions of the INM where nucleocapsids bud into the perinuclear space. We now show by quantitative immunogold electron microscopy coupled with analysis of variance that gD-specific immunoreactivity is significantly reduced at both the INM and outer nuclear membrane (ONM) of cells infected with a U_L34 null virus. While the amount of gM associated with the nuclear membrane (NM) was only slightly (P = 0.027) reduced in cells infected with the U_L34 null virus, enrichment of gM in the INM at the expense of that in the ONM was greatly dependent on U_L34 (P < 0.0001). pU_L34 also interacted directly or indirectly with immature forms of gD (species expected to reside in the endoplasmic reticulum or nuclear membrane) in lysates of infected cells and with the cytosolic tail of gD fused to glutathione S-transferase in rabbit reticulocyte lysates, suggesting a role for the pU_L34/gD interaction in recruiting gD to the NM. The effects of U_L34 on gD and gM localization were not a consequence of decreased total expression of gD and gM, as determined by flow cytometry. Separately, pU_L31 was dispensable for targeting gD and gM to the two leaflets of the NM but was required for (i) the proper INM-versus-ONM ratio of gD and gM in infected cells and (ii) the presence of electron-dense regions in the INM, representing nucleocapsid budding sites. We conclude that in addition to their roles in nucleocapsid envelopment and lamina alteration, U_L31 and U_L34 play separate but related roles in recruiting appropriate components to nucleocapsid budding sites at the INM.Herpesvirus virions comprise a nucleocapsid containing genomic viral DNA, a proteinaceous tegument layer surrounding the nucleocapsid, and a virion envelope surrounding the tegument. The envelope of extracellular herpes simplex virus (HSV) virions contains glycoproteins gB, gC, gD, gE, gI, gG, gH, gK, gL, and gM (23, 51).As viewed by electron microscopy, nascent virions form as the nucleocapsid buds through densely staining regions of the nuclear membrane (NM) (21, 41). Electron tomograms of HSV perinuclear virions compared to those of extracellular virions infer that the former contain glycoproteins of considerably less glycosylation and a relatively sparse tegument layer compared to their counterparts in mature extracellular virions (6). The lower levels of glycosylation in HSV perinuclear virions are consistent with the fact that the lumen of the perinuclear space is continuous with that of the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, the polysaccharide moieties of virion glycoproteins become fully processed as virions access Golgi enzymes during their egress to the extracellular space. Although the full proteome of the nascent perinuclear virion is unknown, immunogold studies have shown that they contain at least pU_L31, pU_L34, pUS3, gB, gC, gD, gH, gM, and the VP16 and pU_L11 tegument proteins in addition to the proteins that comprise the viral capsid (4, 5, 15, 25, 37, 40, 47, 50, 55).The U_L31 and U_L34 gene products of HSV-1 (pU_L31 and pU_L34, respectively) form a complex that localizes at the inner and outer NMs (INM and ONM, respectively) of infected cells (40). Both proteins are essential for nucleocapsid envelopment at the INM and become incorporated into nascent virions when nucleocapsids bud through the INM into the perinuclear space (39, 40, 42). The proteins and their essential role in nucleocapsid envelopment are conserved in all herpesvirus subfamilies (14, 20, 32, 45). pU_L31 of HSV-1 is a mostly hydrophobic phosphoprotein that is held in close approximation to the nucleoplasmic face of the INM by interaction with pU_L34, an integral membrane protein of type II orientation (33, 40, 46, 56). The first 248 amino acids of pU_L34 are predicted to reside in the nucleoplasm or cytoplasm, depending on whether the protein localizes in the INM or ONM, respectively. This is followed by an approximately 22-amino acid transmembrane domain with up to 5 amino acids residing in the perinuclear space or lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum.In the most prominent model of herpesvirion egress, the envelope of the perinuclear virion fuses with the ONM, releasing the deenveloped nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm, where it subsequently buds into cytoplasmic membranous organelles such as the Golgi or trans-Golgi network (34, 49). This model is supported by the observation that pU_L31 and pU_L34 are located in the perinuclear virion but not extracellular virions (18, 40). Thus, these proteins are lost from the virion upon fusion of the virion envelope with the ONM. Also supporting this egress model is the observation that deletion of both gB and gH causes virions to accumulate aberrantly in the perinuclear space (15). The involvement of gH and gB is potentially satisfying because these proteins comprise essential components of the machinery that mediates fusion of the virion envelope with the plasma or endosomal membranes during the initiation of infection (9, 12, 16, 44, 52). Moreover, expression of a combination of gB, gD, gH, and gL is sufficient to mediate fusion of cell membranes, whereas coexpression with gM or gK inhibits this fusion (3, 8, 11). Although the mechanism of fusion is unclear, gD is known to bind viral receptors on cell surfaces, and the structure of gB indicates features reminiscent of other viral fusion proteins (24, 35, 48). gD has been shown to interact with gB and gH at least transiently, suggesting that these interactions may be important for the fusion reaction (1, 2). Thus, fusion between the nascent and mature virion envelopes with target membranes may share mechanistic similarities.On the other hand, it is likely that the two fusion events are mechanistically distinct because (i) single deletion of either gH or gB precludes viral entry and cell/cell fusion but does not cause nascent virions to accumulate in the perinuclear space (9, 16, 31, 43) and (ii) the activity of a viral kinase encoded by U_S3 is dispensable for entry but believed to promote fusion of the perinuclear virion and ONM (28, 40). Moreover, the lack of glycoproteins from the pseudorabies virus perinuclear virion suggests that fusion is mediated by an entirely different mechanism in this system (26).The current study focuses on how glycoproteins are incorporated into the nascent virion. We show that optimal recruitment of gD to both leaflets of the NM and gM to the INM requires pU_L34 and pU_L31. We also show that immature gD interacts with pU_L34, suggesting a mechanism by which pU_L34 might recruit gD to the NM.