Human Herpesvirus 7 U21 Downregulates Classical and Nonclassical Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Molecules from the Cell Surface

Herpesviruses have evolved numerous strategies to evade detection by the immune system. Notably, most of the herpesviruses interfere with viral antigen presentation to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) by removing class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules from the infected cell surface. Clearly, since the herpesviruses have evolved an extensive array of mechanisms to remove class I MHC molecules from the cell surface, this strategy serves them well. However, class I MHC molecules often serve as inhibitory ligands for NK cells, so viral downregulation of all class I MHC molecules should leave the infected cell open to NK cell attack. Some viruses solve this problem by selectively downregulating certain class I MHC products, leaving other class I products at the cell surface to serve as inhibitory NK cell ligands. Here, we show that human herpesvirus 7 (HHV-7) U21 binds to and downregulates all of the human class I MHC gene products, as well as the murine class I molecule H-2K^b. HHV-7-infected cells must therefore possess other means of escaping NK cell detection.Human herpesvirus-7 (HHV-7) is a betaherpesvirus that infects over 90% of the population by the age of 3 (for a review, see reference 58). Like all other herpesviruses, HHV-7 establishes a latent or persistent infection, lasting for the lifetime of its host. Primary infection is usually accompanied by febrile illness, but long-term infection with the virus is asymptomatic (3, 53). HHV-7 is T-lymphotrophic, but it has also been found in salivary epithelial cells (30, 62).As viruses that remain latent or persistent throughout the life of their hosts, the herpesviruses must interact continually with the host immune system. In so doing, all herpesviruses have evolved mechanisms to interfere with viral antigen presentation by class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules as a means to escape detection by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Some herpesvirus gene products interfere with proteolysis of antigens or peptide transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (1, 20, 56, 61). Others retain or destroy class I molecules (2, 26, 59, 64), enhance the internalization of class I molecules, or divert class I molecules to lysosomes for degradation (11, 23, 25, 44). Judging from the number and molecular diversity of these strategies, the removal of MHC class I-peptide complexes from the cell surface must be evolutionarily advantageous to these viruses as a means of escaping immune detection. We have described one such immunoevasin, U21, from HHV-7. HHV-7 U21 binds to class I MHC molecules in the ER and diverts them to a lysosomal compartment, where they are degraded, effectively removing them from the cell surface (23). The mechanism of U21-mediated diversion of class I molecules to lysosomes is not known, but the relocalization of class I MHC molecules is specific—U21 does not cause the rerouting of either the transferrin receptor or CD4 to lysosomes (22, 23).Since the herpesviruses have evolved such an extensive array of mechanisms to remove class I MHC molecules from the cell surface of infected cells, this strategy must serve them well. However, when natural killer (NK) cells detect an absence of class I MHC molecules on the surface of a cell (i.e., “missing self”), they become activated to kill that cell. NK cells detect the absence of class I MHC molecules through interaction of NK cell receptors with NK cell receptor ligands present on the surface of the target cell (for a review, see references 6 and 7). When an NK cell surveys a potential target, it integrates the number and strength of the activating and inhibitory signals it receives; after weighing the balance, it either remains indifferent to the target or becomes activated to kill it.Class I MHC molecules are ligands for inhibitory NK cell receptors. Thus, when a virus removes class I MHC molecules from the cell surface to escape detection by CTLs, it simultaneously renders the cell vulnerable to NK cell attack. Not surprisingly, viruses have evolved counterstrategies to protect their host cells from NK cell-mediated attack. The class I MHC locus contains three classical class I gene products, HLA-A, -B, and -C, as well as other “nonclassical” products, including HLA-E and HLA-G. As a strategy to avoid both CTL and NK cell attack, some viral immunoevasins selectively downregulate HLA-A and HLA-B locus products, while leaving HLA-C, -E, and other inhibitory class I-like molecules at the plasma membrane (10, 16, 35). It has therefore been speculated that HLA-A and -B may be more effective at antigen presentation to CTLs than HLA-C (15, 40). The nonclassical class I molecule HLA-E, on the other hand, functions primarily to inhibit NK cell activation and does not present foreign antigen to CTLs (33). As such, its expression at the cell surface is even promoted by at least one immunoevasin, UL40 from human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) (54, 57).We do not know how HHV-7 responds to the selective pressures exerted by NK cells. We have shown previously that U21 can associate with and downregulate HLA-A and -B, but we do not yet know the full extent of its promiscuity (23). For this reason, we now examine the ability of U21 to bind to and downregulate the various classical and nonclassical class I MHC gene products. We find that, unlike many other viral immunoevasins, HHV-7 U21 can associate with and downregulate HLA-C, -E, and -G and even murine class I MHC molecules. In an infection, this would shift the balance of inhibitory NK cell ligands on the cell surface to favor NK cell attack, suggesting that HHV-7 might compensate for such an imbalance through other means of NK cell evasion.U21 is 55-kDa type I membrane protein with a short (50-amino-acid [aa]) cytoplasmic tail. We have shown that its transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic tail are not involved in its association with the lumenal domain of the class I molecule (22). In addition to gaining information about U21''s potential influence on CTL and NK cell detection of HHV-7-infected cells, we also hoped that a survey of its ability to associate with various class I MHC gene products might help to illuminate regions of the class I molecule important for association with U21.     

The DR1 and DR6 First Exons of Human Herpesvirus 6A Are Not Required for Virus Replication in Culture and Are Deleted in Virus Stocks That Replicate Well in T-Cell Lines

Human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) and HHV-6B are lymphotropic viruses which replicate in cultured activated cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMCs) and in T-cell lines. Viral genomes are composed of 143-kb unique (U) sequences flanked by ∼8- to 10-kb left and right direct repeats, DR_L and DR_R. We have recently cloned HHV-6A (U1102) into bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) vectors, employing DNA replicative intermediates. Surprisingly, HHV-6A BACs and their parental DNAs were found to contain short ∼2.7-kb DRs. To test whether DR shortening occurred during passaging in CBMCs or in the SupT1 T-cell line, we compared packaged DNAs from various passages. Restriction enzymes, PCR, and sequencing analyses have shown the following. (i) Early (1992) viral preparations from CBMCs contained ∼8-kb DRs. (ii) Viruses currently propagated in SupT1 cells contained ∼2.7-kb DRs. (iii) The deletion spans positions 60 to 5545 in DR_L, including genes encoded by DR1 through the first exon of DR6. The pac-2-pac-1 packaging signals, the DR7 open reading frame (ORF), and the DR6 second exon were not deleted. (iv) The DR_R sequence was similarly shortened by 5.4 kb. (v) The DR1 through DR6 first exon sequences were deleted from the entire HHV-6A BACs, revealing that they were not translocated into other genome locations. (vi) When virus initially cultured in CBMCs was passaged in SupT1 cells no DR shortening occurred. (vii) Viral stocks possessing short DRs replicated efficiently, revealing the plasticity of herpesvirus genomes. We conclude that the DR deletion occurred once, producing virus with advantageous growth “conquering” the population. The DR1 gene and the first DR6 exon are not required for propagation in culture.Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a member of the Betaherpesvirus subfamily, as recently reviewed (46). The virus can enter hematopoietic cells, including T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs), as well as nonhematopoietic cells, as reviewed in references 8, 17, and 46. In culture, the virus replicates in activated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMCs), and in T-cell lines (1, 17, 46). HHV-6 isolates fall into two distinct classes designated as HHV-6A and HHV-6B variants. The two variants can be distinguished by their restriction enzyme patterns, antigenicity, DNA sequences, and disease association (1, 36, 46). HHV-6B is the causative agent of roseola infantum, a prevalent children''s disease characterized by high fever and skin rash (47). In rare cases, the virus exhibits neurotropism and has been found in children experiencing convulsions up to lethal encephalitis (1, 21, 46, 48).HHV-6B reactivation from latency was found to occur in patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment in bone marrow and other transplantations. This was associated with febrile illness, delayed transplant engraftment, and neurological involvement, up to lethal encephalitis (5, 13, 34, 46). HHV-6A has thus far no clear disease association, although several studies have suggested central nervous system (CNS) tropism, including aggravation of symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (6, 14, 33, 41).HHV-6A and HHV-6B share general genomic architecture. The unit-length DNA molecules are approximately 160 kb, composed of a 143-kb unique (U) segment flanked by left and right direct repeats (DR_L and DR_R, respectively) (19, 24, 27, 46). The DRs are of sizes 8 to 10 kb in different viral isolates (2, 19, 24, 46). In both the HHV-6A and HHV-6B genomes, the herpesvirus conserved cleavage/packaging signals pac-1 and pac-2 (9, 15, 17) are located at the left and the right termini of the DRs (17, 19, 46). The PubMed sequence for the U1102 strain (accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"NC_001664","term_id":"1344462938","term_text":"NC_001664"}}NC_001664) starts with the pac-1 signal at positions 1 to 56, followed by multiple copies of perfect and imperfect telomere-like sequences, up to position 418. It was suggested that the telomeric repeats may have originated from host cell chromosomal telomeres (43). Additionally, the DR encodes several open reading frames (ORFs), four of which are dealt with in our paper: (i) the spliced DR1 at positions 501 to 759 and 843 to 2653; (ii) DR5 at positions 3738 to 4164; (iii) the spliced DR6 at positions 4725 to 5028 and 5837 to 6720; and (iv) an ORF of DR7, at positions 5629 to 6720, partially overlapping the DR6 gene (20). Hollsberg and coworkers (37) have recently found that the homologous gene in HHV-6B encodes a nuclear protein that forms a complex with viral DNA processivity factor p41. Gompels and coworkers have also shown that DR1 and DR6 are partly homologous to the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) US22 gene family. Both have a CXC motif: DR1 with homology to the HCMV US26 gene and DR6 with homology to the HCMV US22 gene (20). The map continues with reiterated perfect hexanucleotide telomeric sequences (GGGTAA)_n at positions 7655 to 8008 (19, 43). The number of telomeric repeats was found to vary in different viral strains (2, 43). The DR terminates with the pac-2 signal.We have recently cloned the intact HHV-6A genome into bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), by direct cloning of unit-length DNA produced from circular or head-to-tail replication intermediates into modified BAC vectors containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker and ampicillin-puromycin (Amp-Puro) selection cassette (3). Surprisingly, the HHV-6A BAC clones as well as the parental HHV-6A (U1102) propagated in our laboratory in SupT1 cells were found to contain DRs of ∼2.7 kb instead of the expected ∼8- to 10-kb DRs, as in the early publications (19, 24, 27, 46) and in the PubMed sequence. This has raised the following questions. When did the deleted DRs arise? What was the detailed structure of deleted DRs?HHV-6 was discovered by Gallo and colleagues in 1986 (35), and viral isolates were obtained in multiple laboratories from AIDS patients, patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, and patients with roseola infantum (12, 26, 42, 45, 47). The isolates were propagated initially in activated PBLs and CBMCs and then in continuous T-cell lines, including HSB-2, J-JHAN, SupT1, Molt-3, and MT-4 (11, 45). The U1102 strain isolated by Downing and colleagues (12) was contributed to our laboratory by Robert Honess and was propagated first in activated PBLs and CBMCs (11, 18, 36, 45) and then in J-JHAN and SupT1 T cells (4, 30). To answer the question with regard to the origin of the short DRs and their structure, we have compared earlier viral HHV-6A passages with the currently propagated virus and the HHV-6A BAC clones. We describe here the detailed structure of the DR_L and DR_R of the “new” virus, containing the short ∼2.7-kb DR. We show that the deletion contained the left multiple repeats of telomere-like sequences and the ORFs from DR1 up to the DR6 first exon. Review of viral passaging since 1992 indicated that the deletion occurred spontaneously. The deleted viruses were stably and efficiently propagated in SupT1 T cells, indicating that the DR1 and DR6 first exons are not essential for virus in vitro replication.     

Open Reading Frame 33 of a Gammaherpesvirus Encodes a Tegument Protein Essential for Virion Morphogenesis and Egress

Tegument is a unique structure of herpesvirus, which surrounds the capsid and interacts with the envelope. Morphogenesis of gammaherpesvirus is poorly understood due to lack of efficient lytic replication for Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8, which are etiologically associated with several types of human malignancies. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) is genetically related to the human gammaherpesviruses and presents an excellent model for studying de novo lytic replication of gammaherpesviruses. MHV-68 open reading frame 33 (ORF33) is conserved among Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaherpesvirinae subfamilies. However, the specific role of ORF33 in gammaherpesvirus replication has not yet been characterized. We describe here that ORF33 is a true late gene and encodes a tegument protein. By constructing an ORF33-null MHV-68 mutant, we demonstrated that ORF33 is not required for viral DNA replication, early and late gene expression, viral DNA packaging or capsid assembly but is required for virion morphogenesis and egress. Although the ORF33-null virus was deficient in release of infectious virions, partially tegumented capsids produced by the ORF33-null mutant accumulated in the cytoplasm, containing conserved capsid proteins, ORF52 tegument protein, but virtually no ORF45 tegument protein and the 65-kDa glycoprotein B. Finally, we found that the defect of ORF33-null MHV-68 could be rescued by providing ORF33 in trans or in an ORF33-null revertant virus. Taken together, our results indicate that ORF33 is a tegument protein required for viral lytic replication and functions in virion morphogenesis and egress.Gammaherpesviruses are associated with tumorigenesis. Like other herpesviruses, they are characterized as having two distinct stages in their life cycle: lytic replication and latency (15, 16, 18, 21, 54). Latency provides the viruses with advantages to escape host immune surveillance and to establish lifelong persistent infection and contributes to transformation and development of malignancies. However, it is through lytic replication that viruses propagate and transmit among hosts to maintain viral reservoirs. Both viral latency and lytic replication play important roles in tumorigenesis. The gammaherpesvirus subfamily includes Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpesvirus 8 and murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68), among others. EBV is associated with Burkitt''s lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin''s disease, and lymphoproliferative diseases in immunodeficient patients (28). KSHV is etiologically linked with Kaposi''s sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman''s disease (11-13, 22, 52). Neither in vivo nor in vitro studies of EBV and KSHV are convenient due to their propensity to establish latency in cell culture and their limited host ranges.MHV-68 is genetically related to these two human gammaherpesviruses, especially to KSHV, based on the alignment of their genomic sequences and other biological properties (55). As a natural pathogen of wild rodents, MHV-68 also infects laboratory mice (6, 40, 46) and replicates to a high titer in a variety of fibroblast and epithelial cell lines. These advantages make MHV-68 an excellent model for studying the lytic replication of gammaherpesviruses in vitro and certain aspects of virus-host interactions in vivo. In addition, the MHV-68 genome has been cloned as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) that can propagate in Escherichia coli (1, 2, 36, 51), making it convenient to study the function of each open reading frame (ORF) by genetic methods. Exploring the functions of MHV-68 ORFs will likely shed light on the functions of their homologues in human gammaherpesviruses.Gammaherpesviral particles have a characteristic multilayered architecture. An infectious virion contains a double-stranded DNA genome, an icosahedral capsid shell, a thick, proteinaceous tegument compartment, and a lipid bilayer envelope spiked with glycoproteins (14, 30, 47, 49). As a unique structure of herpesviruses, the tegument plays important roles in multiple aspects of the viral life cycle, including virion assembly and egress (38, 48, 53), translocation of nucleocapsids into the nucleus, transactivation of viral immediate-early genes, and modulation of host cell gene expression, innate immunity, and signal transduction (9, 10, 23, 60). Some components of MHV-68 tegument have been identified by a mass spectrometric study (8), and the functions of some tegument proteins have been revealed, such as ORF45, ORF52, and ORF75c (7, 24, 29).MHV-68 ORF33 is conserved among Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaherpesvirinae subfamilies. Its homologues include human herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL16, human herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) UL16, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL94, EBV BGLF2, KSHV ORF33, and rhesus monkey rhadinovirus (RRV) ORF33. HSV-1 UL16 has been identified as a tegument protein and may function in viral DNA packaging, virion assembly, budding, and egress (5, 32, 35, 41, 44). HCMV UL94 is a virion associated protein and might function in virion assembly and budding (31, 57). EBV BGLF2, KSHV ORF33, and RRV ORF33 are also virion-associated proteins, but their functions are not clear (26, 43, 59). The mass spectrometric study of MHV-68 did not identify ORF33 as a virion component (8), although ORF33 is found to be essential for viral lytic replication by transposon mutagenesis of the MHV-68 genome cloned as a BAC (51). However, insertion of the 1.2-kbp Mu transposon in that study may influence the expression of ORFs approximate to ORF33. Consequently, the role ORF33 plays in viral replication needs to be confirmed, preferably through site-directed mutagenesis. Whether ORF33 is a tegument protein and the exact viral replication stage in which it functions also need to be investigated.We determined that MHV-68 ORF33 encodes a tegument protein and is expressed with true late kinetics. To explore the function of ORF33 in viral lytic phase, we used site-directed mutagenesis and generated an ORF33-null mutant, taking advantage of the MHV-68 BAC system. We showed that the ORF33-null mutant is capable of viral DNA replication, early and late gene expression, capsid assembly, and DNA packaging, but incapable of virion release. The defect of ORF33-null mutant can be rescued in trans by an ORF33 expression plasmid.     

Identification of the Nuclear Export and Adjacent Nuclear Localization Signals for ORF45 of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus

Open reading frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus 8 (KSHV) is an immediate-early phosphorylated tegument protein and has been shown to play important roles at both early and late stages of viral infection. Homologues of ORF45 exist only in gammaherpesviruses, and their homology is limited. These homologues differ in their protein lengths and subcellular localizations. We and others have reported that KSHV ORF45 is localized predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas its homologue in murine herpesvirus 68 is localized exclusively in the nucleus. We observed that ORF45s of rhesus rhadinovirus and herpesvirus saimiri are found exclusively in the nucleus. As a first step toward understanding the mechanism underlying the distinct intracellular distribution of KSHV ORF45, we identified the signals that control its subcellular localization. We found that KSHV ORF45 accumulated rapidly in the nucleus in the presence of leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1 (exportin 1)-dependent nuclear export, suggesting that it could shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Mutational analysis revealed that KSHV ORF45 contains a CRM1-dependent, leucine-rich-like nuclear export signal and an adjacent nuclear localization signal. Replacement of the key residues with alanines in these motifs of ORF45 disrupts its shuttling between the cytoplasm and nucleus. The resulting ORF45 mutants have restricted subcellular localizations, being found exclusively either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus. Recombinant viruses were reconstituted by introduction of these mutations into KSHV bacterial artificial chromosome BAC36. The resultant viruses have distinct phenotypes. A mutant virus in which ORF45 is restricted to the cytoplasm behaves as an ORF45-null mutant and produces 5- to 10-fold fewer progeny viruses than the wild type. In contrast, mutants in which the ORF45 protein is mostly restricted to the nucleus produce numbers of progeny viruses similar to those produced by the wild type. These data suggest that the subcellular localization signals of ORF45 have important functional roles in KSHV lytic replication.Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is a DNA tumor virus and the causative agent of several human cancers, including Kaposi''s sarcoma (KS), primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman''s disease (3, 6). Like all herpesviruses, KSHV has two alternative life cycles, a latent and a lytic cycle. During latency, only a few viral genes are expressed, and no progeny viruses are produced. Under appropriate conditions, latent viral genomes are activated, initiate lytic replication, and express a full panel of viral genes, in a process that leads to viral assembly, release of progeny virus particles, and de novo infection of naïve cells (3, 6). KSHV establishes latent infection in the majority of infected cells in cases of KS, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman''s disease, but lytic replications occur in a small fraction. The recurrent and periodic lytic cycles of KSHV are believed to play critical roles in viral pathogenesis (6, 7).Open reading frame 45 (ORF45) is a KSHV-encoded gene product that plays a critical role in the viral lytic cycle. It is an immediate-early protein and is also present in viral particles as tegument protein (26, 27, 30). Disruption of ORF45 has no significant effect on overall viral lytic gene expression or DNA replication in BAC36-reconstituted 293T cells induced with both tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA) and sodium butyrate together, but the ORF45-null mutant produces 5- to 10-fold fewer progeny viruses than the wild type and the mutant virus has dramatically reduced infectivity, suggesting that ORF45 plays important roles at both early and late stages of viral infection (29). In addition to its roles as a tegument component, which are possibly involved in viral ingress and egress processes, KSHV ORF45 interacts with cellular proteins and modulates the cellular environment. At least two such functions have been described. First, KSHV ORF45 inhibits activation of interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF-7) and therefore antagonizes the host innate antiviral response (28). Second, KSHV ORF45 interacts with p90 ribosomal kinase 1 and 2 (RSK1/RSK2) and modulates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/RSK signaling pathway, which is known to play essential roles in KSHV reactivation and lytic replication (12). All of these data suggest that KSHV ORF45 is a multifunctional protein.ORF45 is unique to the gammaherpesviruses; it has no homologue in the alpha- or betaherpesviruses. ORF45 homologues have been identified as virion protein components in other gammaherpesviruses, such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), rhesus rhadinovirus (RRV), and murine herpesvirus 68 (MHV-68), suggesting that certain tegument functions of ORF45 are conserved (2, 11, 18). ORF45 homologues differ in protein length. KSHV ORF45 is the longest, at 407 amino acids (aa); RRV, EBV, MHV-68, and herpesvirus saimiri (HVS) have proteins of 353, 217, 206, and 257 aa, respectively. The limited homologies lie mostly at the amino- and carboxyl-terminal ends. The middle portion of KSHV ORF45 diverges from those of its homologues. The homologues differ in subcellular localization. We and others have reported previously that KSHV ORF45 is found predominantly in the cytoplasm (1, 21, 28, 30), whereas ORF45 of MHV-68 is found exclusively in the nucleus (9). Recently, we found KSHV ORF45 also present in the nuclei of BCBL-1 cells in what resembled viral replication compartments, suggesting that ORF45 could shuttle into the nucleus (12).Nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of proteins across the nuclear membrane occurs through nuclear pore complexes. Small molecules of up to approximately 9 nm in diameter, corresponding to a globular protein of approximately 40 to 60 kDa, can in principle enter or leave the nucleus by diffusion through nuclear pores (15, 17, 24). Large molecules are transported with the aid of a related family of transport factors, importins and exportins, which recognize nuclear localization sequence (NLS)-containing or nuclear export sequence (NES)-containing proteins (15, 17, 23). CRM1 (exportin 1) has been identified as a common export receptor that recognizes human immunodeficiency virus Rev-like leucine-rich NES sequences and is responsible for the export of such NES-containing proteins (4, 5, 19, 22). CRM1-dependent nuclear export is specifically inhibited by a pharmacological compound, leptomycin B (LMB), that interacts with CRM1 and thus blocks such NES-mediated protein export (4).To understand the mechanism underlying the distinct intracellular distribution of KSHV ORF45, we attempted to locate the signals that control its subcellular localization. In the research reported here, we identified a leucine-rich NES and an adjacent basic NLS in KSHV ORF45. We demonstrated that the regulated intracellular trafficking of ORF45, especially its translocation into the nucleus, is important for KSHV lytic replication.     

Retrograde Axon Transport of Herpes Simplex Virus and Pseudorabies Virus: a Live-Cell Comparative Analysis

Upon entry, neuroinvasive herpesviruses traffic from axon terminals to the nuclei of neurons resident in peripheral ganglia, where the viral DNA is deposited. A detailed analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) transport dynamics in axons following entry is currently lacking. Here, time lapse fluorescence microscopy was used to compare the postentry viral transport of two neurotropic herpesviruses: HSV-1 and pseudorabies virus (PRV). HSV-1 capsid transport dynamics were indistinguishable from those of PRV and did not differ in neurons of human, mouse, or avian origin. Simultaneous tracking of capsids and tegument proteins demonstrated that the composition of actively transporting HSV-1 is remarkably similar to that of PRV. This quantitative assessment of HSV-1 axon transport following entry demonstrates that HSV-1 and PRV share a conserved mechanism for postentry retrograde transport in axons and provides the foundation for further studies of the retrograde transport process.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and the veterinary herpesvirus pathogen pseudorabies virus (PRV) establish latent infections within the peripheral nervous systems (PNS) of their hosts. Neurotropic herpesviruses gain access to the PNS at nerve endings present in infected skin or mucosal tissue. Upon entry at the nerve terminal, viral particles are transported in axons toward the neuronal cell body to ultimately deposit the viral genome into the nucleus. This process is referred to as retrograde transport and is critical for the establishment of latency. Following reactivation, progeny viral particles travel anterogradely from the ganglia toward the nerve terminals, resulting in reinfection of the dermis or other innervated tissues. Reactivated infection can manifest in various forms, including asymptomatic virus shedding or mild focal lesions (herpes labialis), or less frequently in more-severe disease (herpes keratitis, encephalitis, and in the case of varicella-zoster virus, shingles).All herpesviruses consist of an icosahedral capsid that contains the viral genome surrounded by a layer of proteins known as the tegument, which is contained within a membrane envelope (33). HSV-1 and PRV capsids disassociate from the viral envelope (2, 13, 14, 22, 23, 25, 28, 30, 40) and several tegument proteins (13, 16, 21, 25) upon fusion-mediated entry into cells. However, following entry into epithelial cell lines, the VP1/2 and UL37 tegument proteins are detected in association with cytosolic capsids of PRV by immunogold electron microscopy (16) and colocalize with HSV-1 capsids at the nuclear membrane by immunofluorescence microscopy (8). In primary sensory neurons, VP1/2 and UL37 are observed to be cotransported with PRV capsids during retrograde transport by time lapse fluorescence microscopy (21), and the kinetics of axon transport have been assessed (39).Although HSV-1 and PRV share similarities in their neurotropism in vivo (reviewed in reference 12), studies of axon transport have indicated possible mechanistic differences relevant to the underlying cell biology of neural transmission (reviewed in reference 10). As a result, a live-cell analysis comparing PRV and HSV-1 is needed to determine if axon transport mechanisms are conserved between the two neuroinvasive herpesvirus genera: Simplexvirus (HSV-1) and Varicellovirus (PRV). In this study, the retrograde transport process that delivers capsids to the nuclei of sensory neurons was compared for HSV-1 (strains KOS and F) and PRV (strain Becker).     

Eukaryotic Viruses in Wastewater Samples from the United States

Human fecal matter contains a large number of viruses, and current bacterial indicators used for monitoring water quality do not correlate with the presence of pathogenic viruses. Adenoviruses and enteroviruses have often been used to identify fecal pollution in the environment; however, other viruses shed in fecal matter may more accurately detect fecal pollution. The purpose of this study was to develop a baseline understanding of the types of viruses found in raw sewage. PCR was used to detect adenoviruses, enteroviruses, hepatitis B viruses, herpesviruses, morbilliviruses, noroviruses, papillomaviruses, picobirnaviruses, reoviruses, and rotaviruses in raw sewage collected throughout the United States. Adenoviruses and picobirnaviruses were detected in 100% of raw sewage samples and 25% and 33% of final effluent samples, respectively. Enteroviruses and noroviruses were detected in 75% and 58% of raw sewage samples, respectively, and both viral groups were found in 8% of final effluent samples. This study showed that adenoviruses, enteroviruses, noroviruses, and picobirnaviruses are widespread in raw sewage. Since adenoviruses and picobirnaviruses were detected in 100% of raw sewage samples, they are potential markers of fecal contamination. Additionally, this research uncovered previously unknown sequence diversity in human picobirnaviruses. This baseline understanding of viruses in raw sewage will enable educated decisions to be made regarding the use of different viruses in water quality assessments.Millions of viruses and bacteria are excreted in human fecal matter (5, 17, 82), and current methods of sewage treatment do not always effectively remove these organisms (74, 76-78). The majority of treated wastewater, as well as untreated sewage, drains into the marine environment (1) and has the potential to threaten environmental (e.g., nutrients and chemicals) (45) and public (e.g., pathogen exposure via swimming and seafood consumption) (1, 24, 28, 29, 33, 44, 57, 63) health. Currently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandates the use of bacterial indicators such as fecal coliforms and enterococci to assess water quality (75). Although monitoring of these bacteria is simple and inexpensive, it has been shown that fecal-associated bacteria are not ideal indicators of fecal pollution.Since fecal-associated bacteria are able to live in sediments in the absence of fecal pollution (18, 32, 55), their resuspension into the water column can result in false-positive results and mask correlations between their concentrations and the extent of recent fecal pollution. Another unfavorable characteristic of current bacterial indicators is their inability to predict or correlate with the presence of pathogenic viruses (25, 40, 41, 64, 80). Human-pathogenic viruses associated with feces are generally more robust than enteric bacteria and are not as easily eliminated by current methods of wastewater treatment (43, 80). For example, adenoviruses are more resilient to tertiary wastewater treatment and UV disinfection than are bacterial indicators of fecal pollution (74). Since bacterial indicators cannot accurately depict the risks to human health from fecal pollution, several studies have proposed the use of a viral indicator of wastewater contamination (35, 41, 61).While it is impractical to monitor the presence of all viral pathogens related to wastewater pollution, the development of an accurate viral indicator of sewage contamination is needed for enhanced water quality monitoring. Enteric viruses (including viruses belonging to the families Adenoviridae, Caliciviridae, Picornaviridae, and Reoviridae) are transmitted via the fecal-oral route and are known to be abundant in raw sewage. These viruses have been used to identify fecal pollution in coastal environments throughout the world (27, 35, 39, 40, 48, 50, 56, 57, 63, 64, 67-69, 71, 80). To determine which viruses are effective indicators of fecal pollution, it is first necessary to establish a broad, baseline understanding of the many diverse groups of eukaryotic viruses in raw sewage. Several studies have identified adenoviruses, noroviruses, reoviruses, rotaviruses, and other enteroviruses (e.g., polioviruses, coxsackie viruses, and echoviruses) in raw sewage in Australia, Europe, and South Africa (30, 47, 58, 76-78). However, no broad baseline data on the presence of eukaryotic viruses in raw sewage in the United States currently exist.This study determined the presence of 10 viral groups (adenoviruses, enteroviruses, hepatitis B viruses, herpesviruses, morbilliviruses, noroviruses, papillomaviruses, picobirnaviruses, reoviruses, and rotaviruses) in raw sewage samples collected throughout the United States. All viral groups that were detected in raw sewage were then examined further to determine if they were also present in final treated wastewater effluent. These 10 viral groups were chosen because of their potential to be transmitted via the fecal-oral route, suggesting that they might be found in raw sewage. Many of these viruses (excluding adenoviruses, enteroviruses, noroviruses, reoviruses, and rotaviruses) have not been studied in sewage despite their likely presence. Picobirnaviruses have been detected in individual fecal samples (12, 70, 79, 82); however, their presence has never been analyzed in collective waste, nor have they been proposed to be potential markers of fecal pollution. This study identified potential viral indicators of fecal pollution and will have important applications to water quality monitoring programs throughout the country.     

The Single-Stranded DNA Genome of Novel Archaeal Virus Halorubrum Pleomorphic Virus 1 Is Enclosed in the Envelope Decorated with Glycoprotein Spikes

Only a few archaeal viruses have been subjected to detailed structural analyses. Major obstacles have been the extreme conditions such as high salinity or temperature needed for the propagation of these viruses. In addition, unusual morphotypes of many archaeal viruses have made it difficult to obtain further information on virion architectures. We used controlled virion dissociation to reveal the structural organization of Halorubrum pleomorphic virus 1 (HRPV-1) infecting an extremely halophilic archaeal host. The single-stranded DNA genome is enclosed in a pleomorphic membrane vesicle without detected nucleoproteins. VP4, the larger major structural protein of HRPV-1, forms glycosylated spikes on the virion surface and VP3, the smaller major structural protein, resides on the inner surface of the membrane vesicle. Together, these proteins organize the structure of the membrane vesicle. Quantitative lipid comparison of HRPV-1 and its host Halorubrum sp. revealed that HRPV-1 acquires lipids nonselectively from the host cell membrane, which is typical of pleomorphic enveloped viruses.In recent years there has been growing interest in viruses infecting hosts in the domain Archaea (43). Archaeal viruses were discovered 35 years ago (52), and today about 50 such viruses are known (43). They represent highly diverse virion morphotypes in contrast to the vast majority (96%) of head-tail virions among the over 5,000 described bacterial viruses (1). Although archaea are widespread in both moderate and extreme environments (13), viruses have been isolated only for halophiles and anaerobic methanogenes of the kingdom Euryarchaeota and hyperthermophiles of the kingdom Crenarchaeota (43).In addition to soil and marine environments, high viral abundance has also been detected in hypersaline habitats such as salterns (i.e., a multipond system where seawater is evaporated for the production of salt) (19, 37, 50). Archaea are dominant organisms at extreme salinities (36), and about 20 haloarchaeal viruses have been isolated to date (43). The majority of these are head-tail viruses, whereas electron microscopic (EM) studies of highly saline environments indicate that the two other described morphotypes, spindle-shaped and round particles, are the most abundant ones (19, 37, 43). Thus far, the morphological diversity of the isolated haloarchaeal viruses is restricted compared to viruses infecting hyperthermophilic archaea, which are classified into seven viral families (43).All of the previously described archaeal viruses have a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome (44). However, a newly characterized haloarchaeal virus, Halorubrum pleomorphic virus 1 (HRPV-1), has a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome (39). HRPV-1 and its host Halorubrum sp. were isolated from an Italian (Trapani, Sicily) solar saltern. Most of the studied haloarchaeal viruses lyse their host cells, but persistent infections are also typical (40, 44). HRPV-1 is a nonlytic virus that persists in the host cells. In liquid propagation, nonsynchronous infection cycles of HRPV-1 lead to continuous virus production until the growth of the host ceases, resulting in high virus titers in the growth medium (39).The pleomorphic virion of HRPV-1 represents a novel archaeal virus morphotype constituted of lipids and two major structural proteins VP3 (11 kDa) and VP4 (65 kDa). The genome of HRPV-1 is a circular ssDNA molecule (7,048 nucleotides [nt]) containing nine putative open reading frames (ORFs). Three of them are confirmed to encode structural proteins VP3, VP4, and VP8, which is a putative ATPase (39). The ORFs of the HRPV-1 genome show significant similarity, at the amino acid level, to the minimal replicon of plasmid pHK2 of Haloferax sp. (20, 39). Furthermore, an ∼4-kb region, encoding VP4- and VP8-like proteins, is found in the genomes of two haloarchaea, Haloarcula marismortui and Natronomonas pharaonis, and in the linear dsDNA genome (16 kb) of spindle-shaped haloarchaeal virus His2 (39). The possible relationship between ssDNA virus HRPV-1 and dsDNA virus His2 challenges the classification of viruses, which is based on the genome type among other criteria (15, 39).HRPV-1 is proposed to represent a new lineage of pleomorphic enveloped viruses (39). A putative representative of this lineage among bacterial viruses might be L172 of Acholeplasma laidlawii (14). The enveloped virion of L172 is pleomorphic, and the virus has a circular ssDNA genome (14 kb). In addition, the structural protein pattern of L172 with two major structural proteins, of 15 and 53 kDa, resembles that of HRPV-1.The structural approach has made it possible to reveal relationships between viruses where no sequence similarity can be detected. It has been realized that several icosahedral viruses infecting hosts in different domains of life share common virion architectures and folds of their major capsid proteins. These findings have consequences for the concept of the origin of viruses. A viral lineage hypothesis predicts that viruses within the same lineage may have a common ancestor that existed before the separation of the cellular domains of life (3, 5, 8, 26). Currently, limited information is available on the detailed structures of viruses infecting archaea. For example, the virion structures of nontailed icosahedral Sulfolobus turreted icosahedral virus (STIV) and SH1 have been determined (21, 23, 46). However, most archaeal viruses represent unusual, sometimes nonregular, morphotypes (43), which makes it difficult to apply structural methods that are based on averaging techniques.A biochemical approach, i.e., controlled virion dissociation, gives information on the localization and interaction of virion components. In the present study, controlled dissociation was used to address the virion architecture of HRPV-1. A comparative lipid analysis of HRPV-1 and its host was also carried out. Our results show that the unique virion type is composed of a flexible membrane decorated with the glycosylated spikes of VP4 and internal membrane protein VP3. The circular ssDNA genome resides inside the viral membrane vesicle without detected association to any nucleoproteins.