Differential distribution of somatostatin sst2 receptor splice variants in rat gastric mucosa

The tetradecapeptide somatostatin (SRIF) has an inhibitory action on acid secretion in the stomach. It has been suggested that somatostatin may act directly on parietal cells as well as indirectly via histamine-producing cells. A family of high affinity membrane-bound receptors, which are termed sst1-sst5 receptors, mediates the physiological effects of somatostatin. On the basis of functional studies it has been suggested that somatostatin may mediate its actions in the stomach by activation of a somatostatin sst2 receptor type. Two splice variants of the rat sst2 receptor exist, sst2(a) and sst2(b), which differ in length and composition of their intracellular carboxy termini. To date, little information is available on the distribution of the somatostatin sst2(b) receptor in any peripheral tissue. Here we show for the first time the localisation of this receptor isoform in the rat oxyntic mucosa, where the receptor protein was found to be present in parietal cells. This is in contrast to sst2(a) receptor, which was localised to enterochromaffin-like cells and nerve fibres. The differential localisation of the receptor isoforms to two key cell types, parietal cells and enterochromaffin-like cells, may explain how somatostatin inhibits acid secretion by more than one mechanism.     

A transplantable phosphorylation probe for direct assessment of G protein-coupled receptor activation

The newly developed multireceptor somatostatin analogs pasireotide (SOM230), octreotide and somatoprim (DG3173) have primarily been characterized according to their binding profiles. However, their ability to activate individual somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst) has not been directly assessed so far. Here, we transplanted the carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation motif of the sst(2) receptor to other somatostatin receptors and assessed receptor activation using a set of three phosphosite-specific antibodies. Our comparative analysis revealed unexpected efficacy profiles for pasireotide, octreotide and somatoprim. Pasireotide was able to activate sst(3) and sst(5) receptors but was only a partial agonist at the sst(2) receptor. Octreotide exhibited potent agonistic properties at the sst(2) receptor but produced very little sst(5) receptor activation. Like octreotide, somatoprim was a full agonist at the sst(2) receptor. Unlike octreotide, somatoprim was also a potent agonist at the sst(5) receptor. Together, we propose the application of a phosphorylation probe for direct assessment of G protein-coupled receptor activation and demonstrate its utility in the pharmacological characterization of novel somatostatin analogs.     

Somatostatin receptors

In 1972, Brazeau et al. isolated somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF), a cyclic polypeptide with two biologically active isoforms (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28). This event prompted the successful quest for SRIF receptors. Then, nearly a quarter of a century later, it was announced that a neuropeptide, to be named cortistatin (CST), had been cloned, bearing strong resemblance to SRIF. Evidence of special CST receptors never emerged, however. CST rather competed with both SRIF isoforms for specific receptor binding. And binding to the known subtypes with affinities in the nanomolar range, it has therefore been acknowledged to be a third endogenous ligand at SRIF receptors. This review goes through mechanisms of signal transduction, pharmacology, and anatomical distribution of SRIF receptors. Structurally, SRIF receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled (GPC) receptors, sharing the characteristic seven-transmembrane-segment (STMS) topography. Years of intensive research have resulted in cloning of five receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)), one of which is represented by two splice variants (sst(2A) and sst(2B)). The individual subtypes, functionally coupled to the effectors of signal transduction, are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian organism, with corresponding differences in physiological impact. It is evident that receptor function, from a physiological point of view, cannot simply be reduced to the accumulated operations of individual receptors. Far from being isolated functional units, receptors co-operate. The total receptor apparatus of individual cell types is composed of different-ligand receptors (e.g. SRIF and non-SRIF receptors) and co-expressed receptor subtypes (e.g. sst(2) and sst(5) receptors) in characteristic proportions. In other words, levels of individual receptor subtypes are highly cell-specific and vary with the co-expression of different-ligand receptors. However, the question is how to quantify the relative contributions of individual receptor subtypes to the integration of transduced signals, ultimately the result of collective receptor activity. The generation of knock-out (KO) mice, intended as a means to define the contributions made by individual receptor subtypes, necessarily marks but an approximation. Furthermore, we must now take into account the stunning complexity of receptor co-operation indicated by the observation of receptor homo- and heterodimerisation, let alone oligomerisation. Theoretically, this phenomenon adds a novel series of functional megareceptors/super-receptors, with varied pharmacological profiles, to the catalogue of monomeric receptor subtypes isolated and cloned in the past. SRIF analogues include both peptides and non-peptides, receptor agonists and antagonists. Relatively long half lives, as compared to those of the endogenous ligands, have been paramount from the outset. Motivated by theoretical puzzles or the shortcomings of present-day diagnostics and therapy, investigators have also aimed to produce subtype-selective analogues. Several have become available.     

Diversity and complexity of the mu opioid receptor gene: alternative pre-mRNA splicing and promoters

Mu opioid receptors play an important role in mediating the actions of a class of opioids including morphine and heroin. Binding and pharmacological studies have proposed several mu opioid receptor subtypes: mu(1), mu(2), and morphine-6beta-glucuronide (M6G). The cloning of a mu opioid receptor, MOR-1, has provided an invaluable tool to explore pharmacological and physiological functions of mu opioid receptors at the molecular level. However, only one mu opioid receptor (Oprm) gene has been isolated. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing has been proposed as a molecular explanation for the existence of pharmacologically identified subtypes. In recent years, we have extensively investigated alternative splicing of the Oprm gene, particularly of the mouse Oprm gene. So far we have identified 25 splice variants from the mouse Oprm gene, which are controlled by two diverse promoters, eight splice variants from the rat Oprm gene, and 11 splice variants from the human Oprm gene. Diversity and complexity of the Oprm gene was further demonstrated by functional differences in agonist-induced G protein activation, adenylyl cyclase activity, and receptor internalization among carboxyl terminal variants. This review summarizes these recent results and provides a new perspective on understanding and exploring complex opioid actions in animals and humans.     

Hybrid receptors formed by insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) have low insulin and high IGF-1 affinity irrespective of the IR splice variant

Insulin receptor (IR) and insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) are both from the same subgroup of receptor tyrosine kinases that exist as covalently bound receptor dimers at the cell surface. For both IR and IGF-IR, the most described forms are homodimer receptors. However, hybrid receptors consisting of one-half IR and one-half IGF-IR are also present at the cell surface. Two splice variants of IR are expressed that enable formation of two isoforms of the IGF-IR/IR hybrid receptor. In this study, these two splice variants of hybrid receptors were studied with respect to binding affinities of insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II). Unlike previously published data, in which semipurified receptors have been studied, we found that the two hybrid receptor splice variants had similar binding characteristics with respect to insulin, IGF-I, and IGF-II binding. We studied both semipurified and purified hybrid receptors. In all cases we found that IGF-I had at least 50-fold higher affinity than insulin, irrespective of the splice variant. The binding characteristics of insulin and IGF-I to both splice variants of the hybrid receptors were similar to classical homodimer IGF-IR.     

Two newly identified exons in human GRM1 express a novel splice variant of metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor

To date, five human metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 1 receptor splice variants (1a, 1b, 1d, 1f, and 1g) have been described, all of which involve alternative C-terminal splicing. mGlu1a receptor contains a long C-terminal domain (341 amino acids), which has been shown to scaffold with several proteins and contribute to the structure of the post-synaptic density. However, several shorter mGlu1 receptor splice variants lack the sequence required for these interactions, and no major functional differences between these short splice variants have been described. By using RT-PCR we have shown that two human melanoma cell lines express both mGlu1a and mGlu1b receptors. In addition, using 3′RACE, we identified three previously unknown mGlu1 receptor mRNAs. Two differ in the length of their 3′ untranslated region (UTR), and encode the same predicted protein as mGlu1g receptor—the shortest of all mGlu1 receptor splice variants. The third mRNA, named mGlu1h, encodes a predicted C-terminal splice variant of 10 additional amino acids. mGlu1h mRNA was observed in two different melanoma cell lines and is overexpressed, compared with melanoma precursor cells, melanocytes. Most importantly, this new splice variant, mGlu1h receptor, is encoded by two previously unidentified exons located within the human GRM1 gene. Additionally, these new exons are found exclusively within the GRM1 genes of higher primates and are highly conserved. Therefore, we hypothesize that mGlu1h receptors play a distinct role in primate glutamatergic signaling.     

Differential beta-arrestin trafficking and endosomal sorting of somatostatin receptor subtypes

The physiological responses of somatostatin are mediated by five different G protein-coupled receptors. Although agonist-induced endocytosis of the various somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)) has been studied in detail, little is known about their postendocytic trafficking. Here we show that somatostatin receptors profoundly differ in patterns of beta-arrestin mobilization and endosomal sorting. The beta-arrestin-dependent trafficking of the sst(2A) somatostatin receptor resembled that of a class B receptor in that upon receptor activation, beta-arrestin and the receptor formed stable complexes and internalized together into the same endocytic vesicles. This pattern was dependent on GRK2 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2)-mediated phosphorylation of a cluster of phosphate acceptor sites within the cytoplasmic tail of the sst(2A) receptor. Unlike other class B receptors, however, the sst(2A) receptor was rapidly resensitized and recycled to the plasma membrane. The beta-arrestin mobilization of the sst(3) and the sst(5) somatostatin receptors resembled that of a class A receptor in that upon receptor activation, beta-arrestin and the receptor formed relatively unstable complexes that dissociated at or near the plasma membrane. Consequently, beta-arrestin was excluded from sst(3)-containing vesicles. Unlike other class A receptors, a large proportion of sst(3) receptors was subject to ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal degradation and did not rapidly recycle to the plasma membrane. The sst(4) somatostatin receptor is unique in that it did not exhibit agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. Together, these findings may provide important clues about the regulation of receptor responsiveness during long-term administration of somatostatin analogs.     

Distribution and characterisation of somatostatin receptor mRNA and binding sites in the brain and periphery.

The distribution and nature of (somatostatin) SRIF receptors and receptor mRNAs was studied in the brain and periphery of various laboratory animals using in situ hybridisation, autoradiography and radioligand binding. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of SRIF receptors msst1, msst2, msst3, msst4 and msst5 was studied in the adult mouse brain by in situ hybridisation histochemistry using specific oligonucleotide probes and compared to that of adult rats. As observed in rat brain, sst3 receptor mRNA is prominently expressed across the mouse brain, although equivalent binding has not yet been identified in situ. Sst1 and sst2 receptor mRNA expression, was prominent and again comparable to that observed in rat brain, whereas sst4 and especially sst5 receptor mRNA show comparatively low levels, although the former appears to be widely distributed while the latter could only be identified in a few nuclei. Altogether, the data are compatible with current knowledge, i.e. sst1 and sst2 receptor mRNA is prominent (both receptors have been functionally identified in the brain and for sst2 in the periphery), sst3 mRNA is highly expressed but in the absence of any functional correlate remains elusive. The expression of sst4 mRNA is comparatively low (especially when compared to what is seen in the lung, where high densities of sst4 receptors are present) and it remains to be seen whether sst5 receptor mRNA, which is confined to a few nuclei, will play a role in the brain, keeping in mind that high levels are found in the pituitary. Radioligand binding studies were performed in CCL39 cells expressing the five human recombinant receptors and compared to binding in membranes of rat cerebral cortex with [125I]Tyr11-SRIF14 which in the presence of 120 mM labels primarily sst1 receptor as suggested by the better correlation hsst1 and similar rank order of potency. The profile of [125I]Tyr3-octreotide labelled sites in rat cortex correlates better with recombinant sst2 than sst3 or sst5 binding profiles. Finally, [125I]LTT-SRIF28-labelled sites in rat lung express a sst4 receptor profile in agreement with previous findings. SRIF receptor autoradiography was performed in the brain and peripheral tissue of rat and/or guinea-pig using a number of ligands known to label recombinant SRIF receptors: [125I]LTT-SRIF28, [125I]CGP 23996, [125I]Tyr10-CST, or [125I]Tyr3-octreotide. Although, [125I]Tyr10-CST has been shown to label all five recombinant SRIF receptors, it is apparent that this radioligand is not useful for autoradiographic studies. By contrast, the other three ligands show good signal to noise ratios in rat or guinea-pig brain, rat lung, rat pancreas, or guinea-pig ileum. In most tissues, [125I]Tyr3-octreotide represents a prominent part of the binding (when compared to [125I]LTT-SRIF28 and [125I]CGP 23996), suggesting that sst2 receptors are strongly expressed in most tissues; it is only in rat lung that [125I]LTT-SRIF28 and [125I]CGP 23996 show marked binding, whereas [125I]Tyr3-octreotide does apparently label no sites, in agreement with the sole presence of sst4 receptors in this tissue.     

The third cytoplasmic loop of a yeast G-protein-coupled receptor controls pathway activation, ligand discrimination, and receptor internalization.

To identify functional domains of G-protein-coupled receptors that control pathway activation, ligand discrimination, and receptor regulation, we have used as a model the alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. From a collection of random mutations introduced in the region coding for the third cytoplasmic loop of Ste2p, six ste2sst alleles were identified by genetic screening methods that increased alpha-factor sensitivity 2.5- to 15-fold. The phenotypic effects of ste2sst and sst2 mutations were not additive, consistent with models in which the third cytoplasmic loop of the alpha-factor receptor and the regulatory protein Sst2p control related aspects of pheromone response and/or desensitization. Four ste2sst mutations did not dramatically alter cell surface expression or agonist binding affinity of the receptor; however, they did permit detectable responses to an alpha-factor antagonist. One ste2sst allele increased receptor binding affinity for alpha-factor and elicited stronger responses to antagonist. Results of competition binding experiments indicated that wild-type and representative mutant receptors bound antagonist with similar affinities. The antagonist-responsive phenotypes caused by ste2sst alleles were therefore due to defects in the ability of receptors to discriminate between agonist and antagonist peptides. One ste2sst mutation caused rapid, ligand-independent internalization of the receptor. These results demonstrate that the third cytoplasmic loop of the alpha-factor receptor is a multifunctional regulatory domain that controls pathway activation and/or desensitization and influences the processes of receptor activation, ligand discrimination, and internalization.     

GABAB receptor complex as a potential target for tumor therapy

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the vertebrate central nervous system. Metabotropic GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consisting of GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits. The intracellular C-terminal domains of GABA(B) receptors are involved in heterodimerization, oligomerization, and association with other proteins, which results in a large receptor complex. Multiple splice variants of the GABA(B1) subunit have been identified in which GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b) are the most abundant isoforms in the nervous system. Isoforms GABA(B1c) through GABA(B1n) are minor isoforms and are detectable only at mRNA levels. Some of the minor isoforms have been detected in peripheral tissues and encode putative soluble proteins with C-terminal truncations. Interestingly, increased expression of GABA(B) receptors has been detected in several human cancer cells and tissues. Moreover, GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen inhibited tumor growth in rat models. GABA(B) receptor activation not only induces suppressing the proliferation and migration of various human tumor cells but also results in inactivation of CREB (cAMP-responsive element binding protein) and ERK in tumor cells. Their structural complexity makes it possible to disrupt the functions of GABA(B) receptors in various ways, raising GABA(B) receptor diversity as a potential therapeutic target in some human cancers.     

Specific interaction between the hop1 intracellular loop 3 domain of the human PAC(1) receptor and ARF

The PAC(1), VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptors are members of the secretin (Group II) family of G protein-coupled receptors. All members of this family activate adenylate cyclase and several have also been shown to activate phospholipase C. We have recently reported that the rat VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors activate phospholipase D and that distinct pathways are utilised by two intracellular loop 3 splice variants of PAC(1), one of which is ARF-dependent. Phospholipase D activation by the hop1, but not the null (short), form of the PAC(1) receptor is sensitive to brefeldin A, an inhibitor of GTP exchange at ARF. We have expressed the null and hop1 intracellular loop 3 domains of the human PAC(1) receptor in bacteria as GST-fusion proteins and used them as peptide affinity matrices to determine whether a functional interaction exists between these domains and ARF. Using this GST pull-down assay, we have shown binding of the small G protein ARF6 to the hop1 but not the null domain of this receptor.     

Homo- and heterodimerization of somatostatin receptor subtypes. Inactivation of sst(3) receptor function by heterodimerization with sst(2A)

Several recent studies suggest that G protein-coupled receptors can assemble as heterodimers or hetero-oligomers with enhanced functional activity. However, inactivation of a fully functional receptor by heterodimerization has not been documented. Here we show that the somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes sst(2A) and sst(3) exist as homodimers at the plasma membrane when expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Moreover, in coimmunoprecipitation studies using differentially epitope-tagged receptors, we provide direct evidence for heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3). The sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer exhibited high affinity binding to somatostatin-14 and the sst(2)-selective ligand L-779,976 but not to the sst(3)-selective ligand L-796,778. Like the sst(2A) homodimer, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer stimulated guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases after exposure to the sst(2)-selective ligand L-779,976. However, unlike the sst(3) homodimer, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer did not promote GTPgammaS binding, adenylyl cyclase inhibition, or extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in the presence of the sst(3)-selective ligand L-796,778. Interestingly, during prolonged somatostatin-14 exposure, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer desensitized at a slower rate than the sst(2A) and sst(3) homodimers. Both sst(2A) and sst(3) homodimers underwent agonist-induced endocytosis in the presence of somatostatin-14. In contrast, the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer separated at the plasma membrane, and only sst(2A) but not sst(3) underwent agonist-induced endocytosis after exposure to somatostatin-14. Together, heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3) results in a new receptor with a pharmacological and functional profile resembling that of the sst(2A) receptor, however with a greater resistance to agonist-induced desensitization. Thus, inactivation of sst(3) receptor function by heterodimerization with sst(2A) or possibly other G protein-coupled receptors may explain some of the difficulties in detecting sst(3)-specific binding and signaling in mammalian tissues.     

Proteomic analysis reveals novel binding partners of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1

Regulated trafficking of neurotransmitter receptors is critical to normal neurodevelopment and neuronal signaling. Group I mGluRs (mGluR1/5 and their splice variants) are G protein-coupled receptors enriched at excitatory synapses, where they serve to modulate glutamatergic transmission. The mGluR1 splice variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b are broadly expressed in the central nervous system and differ in their signaling and trafficking properties. Several proteins have been identified that selectively interact with mGluR1a and participate in receptor trafficking but no proteins interacting with mGluR1b have thus far been reported. We have used a proteomic strategy to isolate and identify proteins that co-purify with mGluR1b in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, an established model system for trafficking studies. Here, we report the identification of 10 novel candidate mGluR1b-interacting proteins. Several of the identified proteins are structural components of the cell cytoskeleton, while others serve as cytoskeleton-associated adaptors and motors or endoplasmic reticulum-associated chaperones. Findings from this work will help unravel the complex cellular mechanisms underlying mGluR trafficking under physiological and pathological conditions.     

Heterodimerization of somatostatin and opioid receptors cross-modulates phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization

Heterodimerization has been shown to modulate the ligand binding, signaling, and trafficking properties of G protein-coupled receptors. However, to what extent heterodimerization may alter agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of these receptors has not been documented. We have recently shown that heterodimerization of sst(2A) and sst(3) somatostatin receptors results in inactivation of sst(3) receptor function (Pfeiffer, M., Koch, T., Schr?der, H., Klutzny, M., Kirscht, S., Kreienkamp, H. J., H?llt, V., and Schulz, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14027-14036). Here we examine dimerization of the sst(2A) somatostatin receptor and the mu-opioid receptor, members of closely related G protein-coupled receptor families. In coimmunoprecipitation studies using differentially epitope-tagged receptors, we provide direct evidence for heterodimerization of sst(2A) and MOR1 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Unlike heteromeric assembly of sst(2A) and sst(3), sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimerization did not substantially alter the ligand binding or coupling properties of these receptors. However, exposure of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer to the sst(2A)-selective ligand L-779,976 induced phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of sst(2A) as well as MOR1. Similarly, exposure of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer to the mu-selective ligand [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin induced phosphorylation and desensitization of both MOR1 and sst(2A) but not internalization of sst(2A). Cross-phosphorylation and cross-desensitization of the sst(2A)-MOR1 heterodimer were selective; they were neither observed with the sst(2A)-sst(3) heterodimer nor with the endogenously expressed lysophosphatidic acid receptor. Heterodimerization may thus represent a novel regulatory mechanism that could either restrict or enhance phosphorylation and desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors.     

Somatostatin receptor gene expression in neuroblastoma

Somatostatin receptor expression is a favorable prognostic factor in human neuroblastoma. Somatostatin receptors have been demonstrated in vitro by pharmacologic analysis of tumor tissue and in vivo by diagnostic radioreceptor scintigraphy. However, which receptor subtypes (sst(1), sst(2), sst(3), sst(4), and sst(5)) are expressed in these tumors has not yet been delineated. We used RT-PCR to analyze expression of the five somatostatin receptor genes in 32 neuroblastoma tumor specimens. All 32 tumor specimens expressed mRNA for c-abl and sst(1); sst(2) mRNA was detected in 27/32 samples and somatostatin mRNA was detected in 30/32 tumor specimens. The remaining receptor subtypes, sst(3), sst(4), and sst(5) were variably expressed. Receptor protein for sst(1) and sst(2) was visualized in tumor neuroblasts as well as in endothelial cells of tumor vessels using immunostaining with specific anti-receptor antibodies. The effect of high expression of somatostatin receptors on cell proliferation was examined in SKNSH neuroblastoma cells transfected with sst(1) and sst(2). SS(14) binding to wild-type SKNSH cells was undetectable; but the native peptide bound with high affinity to the SKNSH/sst(1) and SKNSH/sst(2) neuroblastoma cell lines. Pharmacologic analysis of binding with two long-acting analogues, CH275 and octreotide, confirmed selective expression of sst(1) and sst(2) in stably transfected SKNSH cells. Formation of neuroblastoma xenograft tumors in nude mice was significantly delayed for both SKNSH/sst(1) (P<0.001) and SKNSH/sst(2) (P<0.05) cells compared to wild-type SKNSH. We conclude that: (1) Somatostatin receptors, sst(1) and sst(2), are expressed in the majority of neuroblastomas at diagnosis; and (2) upregulation of functional sst(1) or sst(2) in neuroblastoma cell lines suppresses tumorigenicity in a xenograft model. These observations suggest that somatostatin receptors may be a useful therapeutic target in neuroblastoma.     

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide stimulates thymidine incorporation in endothelial cells: role of endothelin-1

We have previously characterized the receptor for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR) in vascular endothelial cells (EC). Different EC types were found to contain distinct GIPR splice variants. To determine whether activation of the GIPR splice variants resulted in different cellular responses, we examined GIP effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), which contain two GIPR splice variants, and compared them with a spontaneously transformed human umbilical vein EC line, ECV 304, which contains four GIPR splice variants. GIP dose-dependently stimulated HUVEC and ECV 304 proliferation as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. GIP increased endothelin-1 (ET-1) secretion from HUVEC but not from ECV 304. Use of the endothelin B receptor blocker BQ-788 resulted in an inhibition of [3H]thymidine incorporation in HUVEC but not in ECV 304. These findings suggest that, although GIP increases [3H]thymidine incorporation in both HUVEC and ECV 304, this proliferative response is mediated by ET-1 only in HUVEC. These differences in cellular response to GIP may be related to differences in activation of GIPR splice variants.     

Somatostatin down-regulates the expression and release of endozepines from cultured rat astrocytes via distinct receptor subtypes

Endozepines, a family of regulatory peptides related to diazepam-binding inhibitor (DBI), are synthesized and released by astroglial cells. Because rat astrocytes express various subtypes of somatostatin receptors (sst), we have investigated the effect of somatostatin on DBI mRNA level and endozepine secretion in rat astrocytes in secondary culture. Somatostatin reduced in a concentration-dependent manner the level of DBI mRNA in cultured astrocytes. This inhibitory effect was mimicked by the selective sst4 receptor agonist L803-087 but not by the selective sst1, sst2 and sst3 receptor agonists L779-591, L779-976 and L797-778, respectively. Somatostatin was unable to further reduce DBI mRNA level in the presence of the MEK inhibitor U0126. Somatostatin and the sst1, sst2 and sst4 receptor agonists induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of endozepine release. Somatostatin and the sst1, sst2 and sst4 receptor agonists also inhibited cAMP formation dose-dependently. In addition, somatostatin reduced forskolin-induced endozepine release. H89 mimicked the inhibitory effect of somatostatin on endozepine secretion. In contrast the PLC inhibitor U73122, the PKC activator PMA and the PKC inhibitor calphostin C had no effect on somatostatin-induced inhibition of endozepine release. The present data demonstrate that somatostatin reduces DBI mRNA level mainly through activation of sst4 receptors negatively coupled to the MAPK pathway, and inhibits endozepine release through activation of sst1, sst2 and sst4 receptors negatively coupled to the adenylyl cyclase/PKA pathway.     

GABABR异二聚体和GBl-GBl同二聚体中的GBl亚基的作用

GABA水属于c族G蛋白偶联受体,是中枢神经细胞重要的抑制性神经递质受体。在体内GABAa_R由GBl和GB2两个基因编码,1998年以来研究者证实GABABR是由GBl和GB2形成的异二聚体,但近年来的研究表明,GBl也可以单独形成GBl-GBl同二聚体并在体内行使功能。本文系统介绍了GBl亚基的分类,在GB2存在或不存在时的表达,以及在GABAaR异二聚体和GBl．GBl同二聚体激活过程中所扮演的角色和生理功能;同时也展望了这些研究成果对于基础研究和药学研究的意义。关键词：GABA,~R：GBl：GB2：GBl．GBl同二聚体：激活机制