The use of menazon seed dressing to decrease spread of virus yellows in sugar-beet root crops

Menazon, an organophosphorus insecticide (only slightly toxic to mammals), applied to sugar-beet seed, decreased the proportion of seedlings infested with aphids during May and early June and the number of aphids per plant during June and early July to one-third of that in the control plots. It also checked the spread of virus yellows. Of eight field trials in 1965, 1966 and 1967 in which more than 10% of the plants in plots not treated with insecticide had yellows, menazon seed dressing increased sugar yield by about 8 cwt per acre. Spraying with demeton-methyl when ‘a spray warning’ was issued in the area gave a similar increase, and had no further effect on plots sown with menazon-treated seed. Menazon-dressed sugar-beet seed is recommended in regions where yellows is usually prevalent, or where there is reason to expect a large aphid infestation.     

The effects of sowing date and choice of insecticide on cereal aphids and barley yellow dwarf virus epidemiology in northern England

During the mid-1980s, Sitobion avenae became recognised as an important vector of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in the Vale of York. A field trial at the University of Leeds Farm, North Yorkshire, was carried out during the autumn/winter of 1984-85 to evaluate different control procedures against S. avenae-transmitted BYDV and to investigate its epidemiology. Winter barley was sown on three dates in September, and plots were sprayed with either deltamethrin, demeton-S-methyl or pirimicarb on one of three dates between mid-October and mid-November, making a factorial design. Rhopalosiphum padi, the main vector of BYDV in southern England, were rarely found during the experiment, but the numbers of S. avenae were much higher, reaching a peak of 21% of plants infested in the unsprayed plots of the first sowing date. Single applications of each insecticide reduced populations of S. avenae to zero. Some treatments, particularly in the early sown plots and those treated with pirimicarb, however, did allow some recolonisation, and thus led to increased virus incidence and decreased yields. Sprays applied before the end of the migration of S. avenae were more efficient at controlling BYDV if the insecticide was persistent, otherwise a spray after this period, in November, was more effective. Virus incidence, although reduced by sprays, was generally low in plots sown on 18 and 27 September. In contrast, about 11% of plants were infected in unsprayed plots sown on 6 September and a small yield benefit was obtained with insecticidal treatments. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of plants taken from the plots indicated that MAV- and PAV-like strains were present, and were most likely to have been transmitted by S. avenae.     

Experiments on the time of application of insecticide to decrease the spread of yellowing viruses of sugar beet, 1954-66

Sprays of demeton-methyl insecticide decreased the spread of yellowing viruses by aphids in sugar-beet crops in England. Between 1957 and 1960, when yellows was prevalent, the incidence, assessed as ‘infected-plant-weeks’, was decreased by 36–41 % by one spray, depending on when it was applied, and by 55 % by two sprays, giving average yield increases of 1½ and 2 ton/acre of roots respectively. Between 1962 and 1966, when yellows spread less, a spray at the time when growers were advised to spray by the British Sugar Corporation decreased yellows incidence by 37 %, whereas sprays 2 weeks earlier or later decreased it by 24 % and 25 % respectively. Between 1958 and 1966 an annual average of 160000 of the country's 440000 acres of sugar beet has been sprayed, often to control Aphis fabae as well as to check the spread of yellows. A spray gives a profitable yield increase when yellows incidence in unsprayed plots is 20 % at the end of August.     

SEED AND SOIL TREATMENT WITH SYSTEMIC INSECTICIDES TO PREVENT APHID COLONIZATION OF EMERGING BEET SEEDLINGS

Dimefox at 2 lb. or diethyl ethylthiomethyl dithiophosphate (Thimet) at 1 lb. applied at drilling in 100 gal. water along the drills, or seed treated at rates giving 6–8 oz. Thimet or 8–24 oz. diethyl ethylthioethyl dithiophosphate (Disyston) per acre†, made sugar beet seedlings toxic to aphids up to 30 days after sowing four root crops in April-May, and up to 30–40 days after sowing five steckling crops in autumn. Malathion, demeton, demeton methyl, bis (dimethylamino) azido phosphine oxide (N.C.7) and schradan were less effective. The infestation of green aphids was decreased by the treatments during what is often a critical period for virus infection in summer-sown stecklings and occasionally in spring-sown root crops. Germination was 73–100% of the control after soil treatments, 91–98% after Disyston seed treatments and 62–84% after Thimet seed treatments. The treatments slightly decreased Aphis fabae injury to steckling seedlings in 1955 and the number of plants with yellows in a steckling experiment in 1956.     

Some observations on the economic importance of sugar-beet downy mildew in England

Sugar-beet downy mildew is most prevalent in England in the sugar-beet and mangold seed-growing area of South Lincolnshire and West Norfolk. The most widespread and severe recent outbreaks were in 1957, and in 1965 when 6412 acres were reported with more than 10% infected plants. The fungus usually overwinters in sugar-beet and mangold seed crops, and in England other ways of overwintering are seldom important. Steckling beds are infected in the autumn, and the disease may increase rapidly in the seed crop in early spring. Summer-sown stecklings get more downy mildew than stecklings sown in spring under a cereal cover crop, and direct-drilled seed crops get more downy mildew than transplanted crops.     

Some effects of spraying with thiabendazole on the susceptibility of sugar beet to yellowing viruses and on their vector, Myzus persicae (Sulz.)

In a field experiment fewer sugar-beet plants became infected with aphid-transmitted yellowing viruses in plots that had been sprayed with solutions of thiabendazole lactate than in water-sprayed plots, after exposure to natural infestation with aphids. Subsequent glasshouse tests showed that foliar sprays of o·o1 % thiabendazole lactate in water significantly reduced the proportion of inoculated sugar-beet plants which became infected with beet yellows virus (BYV) or beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV) after inoculation with viruliferous Myzus persicae (Sulz.). This effect on virus transmission was not apparently due to a direct insecticidal action of thiabendazole, because adult aphids usually survived equally well on sprayed and unsprayed plants. Treatment of test plants with thiabendazole did not affect the transmission of beet mosaic virus to them by M. persicae. The fecundity of M. persicae was greatly reduced by transferring them to plants which had been sprayed with thiabendazole or by spraying them with thiabendazole before transfer to unsprayed plants. The fertility of adult Aphis fabae Scop, was also reduced by spraying with thiabendazole. The mechanisms whereby thiabendazole affected fecundity of aphids and transmission of viruses are not understood.     

The action of some systemic aphicides on the nymphs of Anthocoris nemorum (L.) and A. confusus Reut

The aphicides phorate, dimethoate and menazon were compared to elucidate the different pathways by which they can affect Anthocoris nymphs and their aphid prey.
When nymphs were caged in contact with deposits on bean leaves phorate and dimethoate had contact LC 50s of 20 and 3 μg/cm² respectively to Anthocoris nemorum and 46 and 6 μg/cm² to A. confusus. When the nymphs were confined on treated leaves on the opposite surface to the deposits, neither phorate nor dimethoate killed them. Menazon did not kill anthocorids at any dosage. All three aphicides killed over 50% of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Kalt.) on bean leaves at 1.6 μg/cm² whether the aphids were on the treated or untreated surface.
Experiments with ³⁵S-labelled phorate showed that anthocorids confined on phorate-treated bean plants, with or without insect food, accumulated the insecticide or its labelled derivatives. In field experiments in which A. nemorum were caged on plants treated with phorate, many were killed on young newly treated plants but not on older plants. A. confusus was relatively unaffected.
Anthocorids were reared from 2nd-instar nymphs to adults on aphids killed systemically with phorate, dimethoate or menazon without ill effects, despite evidence that ³⁵S-labelled phorate was ingested from the aphids and excreted in the faeces.
In the field, fewer large A. nemorum nymphs were found in August in plots of tick beans treated with phorate granules at 6 lb/acre (6.7 kg/ha) when sown, than in plots treated at 1.5 lb/acre (1.7 kg/ha) with phorate or menazon or untreated plots.     

Interactions of crop density of field beans, abundance of Aphis fabae Scop., virus incidence and aphid control by chemicals

The number of Aphis fabae Scop. per plant and per acre developing on field beans (Vicia faba L.) was inversely related to seeding rate (i.e. plant density) except sometimes at very low rates; with equal numbers of plants per acre, fewer aphids developed on plants in rows 11 in. than 22 in. apart. Plots sown in mid-March with more than about 150,000 plants per acre were more attractive than less dense stands to colonizing alate A. fabae, but established colonies multiplied most on the sparsest and least on the densest plots. The number of plants per acre infected by pea leaf-roll virus was inversely related to planting density. There were more virus-infected plants on II in. than on 22 in. spaced rows-in contrast to the numbers of A. fabae. A single spray with demeton-methyl, timed to control A. fabae, did not significantly decrease virus incidence. Grain yields of sprayed plots were little altered by increasing the seed rate above a critical minimum, except in one year when the densest crops lodged. Increased yields from spraying were closely related to the numbers of A. fabae on unsprayed plots. Dense planting (more than 400,000 plants per acre) prevented or greatly decreased losses caused by A. fabae in unsprayed plots except in one year when the aphids were exceptionally abundant.     

Further studies on cucumber mosaic virus infection of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius): seed-borne infection, aphid transmission, spread and effects on grain yield

Four field trials were done with narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius) in 1988 - 1989, to examine the effect of sowing seed with 5% and 0.5% cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection on subsequent virus spread, grain yield and percentage of infection in harvested seed. A proportion of the CM V-infected seed failed to produce established plants and thus, plots sown with 5% and 0.5% infected seed contained 1.5-2.9% and 0.2-0.3% of seed-infected plants respectively. The rate of virus spread by aphids was faster and resulted in more extensive infection at maturity in plots sown with 5% infected seed than with 0.5% infected seed. In three trials, sowing 5% infected seed resulted in yield losses of 34 - 53% and CMV infection in the seed harvested of 6 - 13%. The spread of CMV infection resulting from sowing 0.5% infected seed did not significantly decrease yield. However, late CMV spread in these plots caused > 1% seed infection. In the fourth trial, which was badly affected by drought, CMV spread only slowly, there was no significant effect of CMV on grain yield and the percentage of infected seed harvested was 3–5 times less than that in the seed sown. When CMV-infected seed was sown at different depths, target depths of 8 and 11 cm decreased the incidence of seed-infected plants by c. 15% and c. 50% respectively compared with sowing at 5 cm. However, in glasshouse tests, treatment with the pre-emergence herbicide simazine failed to selectively cull out seed-infected plants. The field trials were colonised by green peach (Myzus persicae), blue-green (Acyrthosiphon kondoi) and cowpea (Aphis craccivora) aphids. When the abilities of these aphid species and of the turnip aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) in transmitting CMV from lupins to lupins were examined in glasshouse tests, short acquisition access times favoured transmission. With 5–10 min acquisition access times, overall transmission efficiencies were 10.8%, 9.4%, 6.1% and 3.9% for the green peach, cowpea, blue-green and turnip aphids respectively.     

The competitive effects of volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare) on the growth of oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

The effects of competition from volunteer barley (Hordeum vulgare) on the growth and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were investigated in four experiments over three seasons. The growth of rape in the autumn was reduced by 50 - 91 % by competition from 400 barley plants m^-2. A lower barley density of 200 plants m^-2 had less effect but still reduced growth of rape by 65 - 81% in two of the experiments and 25 - 40% in the other two. During winter and spring the barley decreased in vigour and in the spring the rape started to recover, especially on the early drilled (23 - 30 August) plots. The rape sown in mid-September recovered less quickly. In Experiment 3, herbicides applied in November to control barley did not result in increased growth of rape in winter but led to greater recovery in spring. The barley died during the winter in Experiments 2 and 4, even in the absence of herbicides. Despite the marked effects of barley on the growth of rape in the autumn, yields on plots that had previously contained 200 barley plants m^-2 were reduced by a maximum of only 16% in three of the experiments. In Experiment 3, where the barley was most competitive, this density and 400 plants m^-2 lowered yields by 39% and 78%, respectively. Where a herbicide was used in November to control the barley these yield losses were reduced to 5%. In many rape crops the cost of herbicide treatment would be greater than the financial returns from the expected increase in yield resulting from the control of weeds. Possible reasons for the small loss in yield of rape from barley densities that had substantial effects on the growth of rape in the autumn are discussed.     

THE INFLUENCE OF DENSITY OF PLANT POPULATION ON THE INCIDENCE OF YELLOWS IN SUGAR-BEET CROPS

The incidence of yellows virus in sugar-beet crops was reduced by increasing the density of plant population. The variations in plant population were obtained by differences in row width and singling distance. The differences in susceptibility between large- and small-topped varieties, and between early and late sown crops, could not be attributed solely to differences in plant size. It is suggested that close planting would increase the yields of sugar beet and reduce the losses caused by yellows virus. Roguing infected plants during the early part of the growing season did not reduce the incidence of disease.     

The influence of primary infection date and establishment of vector populations on the spread of yellowing viruses in sugar beet

In three field experiments in 1985 and 1986, we studied the effect of the date of primary infection on the spread of beet yellows closterovirus (BYV) and beet mild yellowing luteovirus (BMW) from artificially inoculated sugar beet plants. Laboratory-reared vector aphids, Myzus persicae, were placed on these sources of virus. There was no substantial natural immigration of vectors or viruses. In two experiments, one with BMYV in 1985 and the other in BYV in 1986, populations of vector aphids remained low and there was little virus spread, i.e. c. 50 infected plants from one primarily infected source. The cause of this small amount of spread was the low number of vector aphids. In the third experiment, with BYV in 1986, large populations of M. persicae developed and there was substantial virus spread: c. 2000 infected plants in the plots which were inoculated before canopy closure. In later-inoculated plots in the same experiment, there was much less spread: c. 100 infected plants per virus source plant. Differences between fields in predator impact are implicated as the most probable factor causing differences in vector establishment and virus spread between these three experiments. Virus spread decreased with later inoculation in all three experiments. A mathematical model of virus spread incorporating results from our work has been used to calculate how the initial proportion of infected plants in a crop affects the final virus incidence. This model takes into account the effect of predation on the development of the aphid populations. The processes underlying the spread and its timing are discussed.     

Detection of the luteoviruses, beet mild yellowing virus and beet western yellows virus, in aphids caught in sugar-beet and oilseed rape crops, 1990–1993

The incidence of beet mild yellowing luteovirus (BMYV) and non-beet-infecting strains of beet western yellows luteovirus (BWYV) in individual winged aphids, caught in yellow water-traps, in sugar beet during the spring and early summer, and in oilseed rape plots in the autumn, was monitored using monoclonal antibodies in ELISA tests from 1990 to 1993. Between 0% and 8% of the Myzus persicae trapped in sugar beet each year carried BMYV, whereas 0% to 4% caught in oilseed rape in the autumn contained this virus. In 1990, 6.5% of Macrosiphum euphorbiae trapped in sugar beet contained BMYV, but in subsequent years less than 1% were carrying virus. Much higher proportions (26–67%) of the M. persicae tested from sugar beet contained BWYV, and similar proportions tested from oilseed rape (24–45%) also carried this virus in the autumn. In contrast only 3–19% of the M. euphorbiae caught in sugar beet contained BWYV, and none in oilseed rape. In 1991 and 1992 large numbers of Breuicoryne brassicae were caught in the plot of oilseed rape, of which over 50% contained BWYV; none were carrying BMYV. In transmission studies between 1990 and 1992, 1% and 27% of M. persicae transmitted BMYV and BWYV respectively to indicator plants; subsequent ELISA tests on the same aphids showed that 3% and 33% respectively contained the two viruses. One percent of M. euphorbiae transmitted BMYV, but none were found to contain BMYV using ELISA; 15% transmitted BWYV whilst only 5% were found to carry the virus. In 1992 and 1993 the incidence of BMYV-infection in the sugar-beet fields in which aphids had been trapped ranged from 1.2%, in a field which had received granular pesticide (aldicarb) at drilling plus three foliar aphicidal sprays, to 39.5% in a field which had received only one foliar spray. In 1992 in a sugar-beet crop which had received no aphicidal treatments, and where 2.8% of immigrant M. persicae and 2.5% of M. euphorbiae contained BMYV, 11.6% of plants developed BMYV infection. Lowest levels of infection were associated with the use of granular pesticides at drilling. In 1990, 80% of oilseed rape plants in a field plot were infested with a mean of seven wingless M. persicae per plant by mid-December; 37% of these plants were infected with BWYV. The studies show that M. persicae is the principal vector of BWYV, and large proportions of winged M. persicae carry the virus, in contrast to BMYV, which is consistent with the common occurrence of BWYV in brassica crops such as oilseed rape.     

The role of grasslands in the yearly life-cycle of Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Sweden.

The population density of the bird cherry-oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) was monitored in spring sown barley and in grasslands (leys and pastures) and a suction trap was used to monitor the flight periodicity of the aphids. Emigrants from the primary host (bird cherry) colonised both grass and cereals in spring and a migration from cereals to grasses took place in mid-summer. There was a negative correlation between the sizes of summer and autumn migration. There was a positive relationship between late summer growth in leys and the size of autumn migrations. It is concluded that the size of the autumn migration is mainly dependent on aphid population growth in grasslands during late summer and autumn.     

The nature and causes of annual fluctuations in numbers of Aphis fabae Scop. on field beans (Vicia faba)

Experiments for nine successive years showed that Aphis fabae Scop. populations on mid-March-sown field beans were either large with peak densities between late June and mid-July or very small with peak densities in early August. It is concluded that the largest populations develop when many plants have been colonized by primary migrants from Euonymus europaeus and temperature and radiation are above average during June and early July, as in the year 1957. Cold, dull weather slows multiplication and decreases the size of the peak population even when there is a large initial colonization, as in 1954. The peak population may also be less than predicted from the initial colonization when natural enemies are exceptionally abundant in early June, as in the year 1960. Yield losses of mid-March-sown crops in years of large A. fabae populations ranged from 53 % in 1954 (peak population of 1260 aphids per plant) to 100% in 1957 (6920 aphids per plant). Small summer populations with peak densities of about 0·2–85 aphids per plant developed on mid-March-sown plots in years when fewer than about 6% of the plants were colonized by primary migrants. Yield losses ranged from 6·3–13·6%. Three years' experiments indicated that crops sown in late April or May are relatively lightly infested in years when large populations develop on mid-March-sown crops. Conversely, they may be relatively heavily infested when the populations on these crops are small, as in 1955 when temperatures and sunshine during July and early August were above average. Small and large early summer populations tend to alternate in successive years. The alternation is upset by hot, sunny weather during July and August, and perhaps September and October, which compresses the population cycle Thus the large and small populations expected from this alternation in 1956 and 1960 developed instead during exceptionally fine weather in late summer 1955 and 1959, converting 1956 and 1960 to years of small and large populations respectively.     

Some effects, especially on yield, of artificially defoliating sugar beet

The effects of completely defoliating sugar beet at different dates from May to October were examined in four years. In each year there were plots given the usual nitrogen fertiliser application to the seedbed, and also in two of the years plots given no nitrogen. At harvest in mid-November, minimum root weights followed defoliation in July or August, but defoliation in August or later gave minimum sugar contents. When nitrogen was applied to the seedbed sugar yields were smallest after August defoliation; in the absence of nitrogen, July defoliation gave the lowest sugar yields, root yield being smaller but sugar content usually greater than with nitrogen. Up to 40% of the sugar yield was lost by July or August defoliation and late defoliation increased some of the impurities in the root juice. Yields, and recovery from defoliation, were greater with nitrogen than without. Partial defoliation in May had relatively little effect on yield. Defoliation affected the incidence of virus yellows differently in different years.     

Losses in productivity of subterranean clover swards caused by sowing cucumber mosaic virus-infected seed

Field trials were done in 1988 - 89 at two sites to examine the effects of sowing seed stocks in which a low proportion (1.6–7.0%) of the seed was carrying cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) infection (= infected seed) and the subsequent CM V spread that results, on the productivity of swards of subterranean clover cvs Esperance, Green Range and Karridale. Except in irrigated plots of cv. Green Range, a variable proportion of the CMV-infected seedlings always failed to establish, so sowing infected seed normally resulted in plots containing fewer or far fewer seed-infected plants than expected. The rate of virus spread by aphids was faster and resulted in more extensive infection at maturity when the plots contained more seed-infected source plants. In two irrigated trials at South Perth, in which healthy and infected seed of cvs Esperance and Green Range was sown, CMV spread was extensive. When the plots were left undefoliated, herbage dry wt yields were decreased by 12 – 30% and seed yields by 53 – 64% due to infection. When they were mown, the herbage dry wt losses recorded were 17 – 24%. In three trials at Mt Barker sown with healthy and infected seed, extensive spread of CMV occurred with cv. Green Range but not with cvs Esperance and Karridale. With cv. Green Range, losses of 25 – 28% in herbage dry wt were recorded inside CMV-affected patches in mown or grazed plots, while losses were up to 13% when herbage was sampled at random. Seed yield losses were 40–42% and 53% in infected mown and undefoliated cv. Green Range plots, respectively. In the mown or grazed plots of cvs Esperance and Karridale, herbage dry wt losses recorded were up to 7% while seed yield losses were 9 – 16% in mown and 9% in undefoliated plots. The mean wt/seed of seed harvested from mown plots of cvs Green Range and Karridale sown with infected seed was 8–12% less than that of seed from mown control plots. CMV was detected in seed harvested from undefoliated cv. Green Range plots and mown plots of cvs Green Range and Karridale sown with infected seed but levels of seed infection with the mown plots were 3–5 times less than in the seed sown. Field trials were done at two sites in 1987 – 90 to examine the persistence of CMV in subterranean clover swards. CMV infection was established in 1987 and the plots were grazed in subsequent years. At Badgingarra, infection gradually decreased with little CMV being recovered by 1990. At Mt Barker, recovery of CMV was relatively poor in 1988 and even poorer in 1989, but there was some resurgence of CMV infection in 1990.     

Inherited resistance of sugar beet to aphid colonization

Results of glasshouse experiments have confirmed that inbred lines of sugar beet differ in each of three types of resistance to Myzus persicae Sulz. and Aphis fabae Scop., namely: resistance to settling, resistance to multiplication, and tolerance. Resistance to multiplication was not invariably associated with resistance to settling, although plants of some lines showed both forms of resistance. Plants that were resistant to settling of alatae were not always resistant to apterae of the same species, and there was not a close relationship between resistance to M. persicae and to A. fabae. The mechanisms involved in resistance to aphids in sugar beet are not understood. Progenies of plants, selected for resistance to aphids from inbred lines, were often more resistant than progenies of unselected plants. Inheritance of each type of resistance is probably polygenic. The potential value of the different kinds of resistance, in reducing direct feeding damage and controlling the spread of virus yellows in the field, is discussed. The ultimate breeding objective is to produce commercial varieties in which appropriate kinds of resistance to aphids are combined with resistance to virus yellows. The use of such varieties would reduce the need to control aphids in the field by applications of chemicals.     

THE SPREAD OF BEET YELLOWS AND BEET MOSAIC VIRUSES IN THE SUGAR-BEET ROOT CROP I. FIELD OBSERVATIONS ON THE VIRUS DISEASES OF SUGAR BEET AND THEIR VECTORS MYZUS PERSICAE SULZ. AND APHIS FABAE KOCH

A survey of aphids and virus diseases of sugar-beet root crops in eastern England was made between 1940 and 1948. Prior to 1943 the observations were made on fertilizer experiments; from 1943 onwards they were made on commercial fields selected for position in relation to beet and mangold seed crops. The incidence of beet yellows increased with increasing numbers of Myzus persicae , but not of Aphis fabae. The relation with M. persicae was sufficiently close to suggest that it is the most important, possibly the only important, vector of beet yellows virus. Beet mosaic virus also increased with increasing numbers of M. persicae , but the relation was not close enough to exclude the possibility of other vectors.
Numbers of A. fabae on sugar beet were slightly, but consistently, depressed by the use of salt as a fertilizer. Other fertilizers had variable effects. Neither aphids nor virus are likely to be greatly affected by fertilizers.
Beet yellows is most prevalent in areas where seed crops are grown, but within these areas nearness to individual seed crops did not appear to increase its incidence. M. persicae were more numerous on sugar beet in seed-crop areas than elsewhere, and this alone might account for the prevalence of yellows. Beet mosaic virus is more closely associated with seed crops than is beet yellows. It is most prevalent near to seed crops within the seed-crop areas.