Intact aminoacyl-tRNA is required to trigger GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) on the ribosome is induced by codon recognition. The mechanism by which a signal is transmitted from the site of codon-anticodon interaction in the decoding center of the 30S ribosomal subunit to the site of EF-Tu binding on the 50S subunit is not known. Here we examine the role of the tRNA in this process. We have used two RNA fragments, one which contains the anticodon and D hairpin domains (ACD oligomer) derived from tRNA(Phe) and the second which comprises the acceptor stem and T hairpin domains derived from tRNA(Ala) (AST oligomer) that aminoacylates with alanine and forms a ternary complex with EF-Tu. GTP. While the ACD oligomer and the ternary complex containing the Ala-AST oligomer interact with the 30S and 50S A site, respectively, no rapid GTP hydrolysis was observed when both were bound simultaneously. The presence of paromomycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic that binds to the decoding site and stabilizes codon-anticodon interaction in unfavorable coding situations, did not increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis. These results suggest that codon recognition as such is not sufficient for GTPase activation and that an intact tRNA molecule is required for transmitting the signal created by codon recognition to EF-Tu.     

Deacylated tRNA is released from the E site upon A site occupation but before GTP is hydrolyzed by EF-Tu

The presence or absence of deacylated tRNA at the E site sharply influences the activation energy required for binding of a ternary complex to the ribosomal A site indicating the different conformations that the E-tRNA imparts on the ribosome. Here we address two questions: (i) whether or not peptidyltransferase—the essential catalytic activity of the large ribosomal subunit—also depends on the occupancy state of the E site and (ii) at what stage the E-tRNA is released during an elongation cycle. Kinetics of the puromycin reaction on various functional states of the ribosome indicate that the A-site substrate of the peptidyltransferase center, puromycin, requires the same activation energy for peptide-bond formation under all conditions tested. We further demonstrate that deacylated tRNA is released from the E site by binding a ternary complex aminoacyl-tRNA•EF-Tu•GDPNP to the A site. This observation indicates that the E-tRNA is released after the decoding step but before both GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu and accommodation of the A-tRNA. Collectively these results reveal that the reciprocal linkage between the E and A sites affects the decoding center on the 30S subunit, but does not influence the rate of peptide-bond formation at the active center of the 50S subunit.     

Ribosome interactions of aminoacyl-tRNA and elongation factor Tu in the codon-recognition complex

The mRNA codon in the ribosomal A-site is recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Here we report the 13 A resolution three-dimensional reconstruction determined by cryo-electron microscopy of the kirromycin-stalled codon-recognition complex. The structure of the ternary complex is distorted by binding of the tRNA anticodon arm in the decoding center. The aa-tRNA interacts with 16S rRNA, helix 69 of 23S rRNA and proteins S12 and L11, while the sarcin-ricin loop of 23S rRNA contacts domain 1 of EF-Tu near the nucleotide-binding pocket. These results provide a detailed snapshot view of an important functional state of the ribosome and suggest mechanisms of decoding and GTPase activation.     

GTPase activation of elongation factor EF‐Tu by the ribosome during decoding

We have used single‐particle reconstruction in cryo‐electron microscopy to determine a structure of the Thermus thermophilus ribosome in which the ternary complex of elongation factor Tu (EF‐Tu), tRNA and guanine nucleotide has been trapped on the ribosome using the antibiotic kirromycin. This represents the state in the decoding process just after codon recognition by tRNA and the resulting GTP hydrolysis by EF‐Tu, but before the release of EF‐Tu from the ribosome. Progress in sample purification and image processing made it possible to reach a resolution of 6.4 Å. Secondary structure elements in tRNA, EF‐Tu and the ribosome, and even GDP and kirromycin, could all be visualized directly. The structure reveals a complex conformational rearrangement of the tRNA in the A/T state and the interactions with the functionally important switch regions of EF‐Tu crucial to GTP hydrolysis. Thus, the structure provides insights into the molecular mechanism of signalling codon recognition from the decoding centre of the 30S subunit to the GTPase centre of EF‐Tu.     

Cleavage of the sarcin–ricin loop of 23S rRNA differentially affects EF-G and EF-Tu binding

Ribotoxins are potent inhibitors of protein biosynthesis and inactivate ribosomes from a variety of organisms. The ribotoxin α-sarcin cleaves the large 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) at the universally conserved sarcin–ricin loop (SRL) leading to complete inactivation of the ribosome and cellular death. The SRL interacts with translation factors that hydrolyze GTP, and it is important for their binding to the ribosome, but its precise role is not yet understood. We studied the effect of α-sarcin on defined steps of translation by the bacterial ribosome. α-Sarcin-treated ribosomes showed no defects in mRNA and tRNA binding, peptide-bond formation and sparsomycin-dependent translocation. Cleavage of SRL slightly affected binding of elongation factor Tu ternary complex (EF-Tu•GTP•tRNA) to the ribosome. In contrast, the activity of elongation factor G (EF-G) was strongly impaired in α-sarcin-treated ribosomes. Importantly, cleavage of SRL inhibited EF-G binding, and consequently GTP hydrolysis and mRNA–tRNA translocation. These results suggest that the SRL is more critical in EF-G than ternary complex binding to the ribosome implicating different requirements in this region of the ribosome during protein elongation.     

The ribosome‐bound initiation factor 2 recruits initiator tRNA to the 30S initiation complex

Bacterial translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) is a GTPase that promotes the binding of the initiator fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S ribosomal subunit. It is often assumed that IF2 delivers fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the ribosome in a ternary complex, IF2·GTP·fMet‐tRNA^fMet. By using rapid kinetic techniques, we show here that binding of IF2·GTP to the 30S ribosomal subunit precedes and is independent of fMet‐tRNA^fMet binding. The ternary complex formed in solution by IF2·GTP and fMet‐tRNA is unstable and dissociates before IF2·GTP and, subsequently, fMet‐tRNA^fMet bind to the 30S subunit. Ribosome‐bound IF2 might accelerate the recruitment of fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S initiation complex by providing anchoring interactions or inducing a favourable ribosome conformation. The mechanism of action of IF2 seems to be different from that of tRNA carriers such as EF‐Tu, SelB and eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), instead resembling that of eIF5B, the eukaryotic subunit association factor.     

Streptomycin interferes with conformational coupling between codon recognition and GTPase activation on the ribosome

Aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) are selected by the ribosome through a kinetically controlled induced fit mechanism. Cognate codon recognition induces a conformational change in the decoding center and a domain closure of the 30S subunit. We studied how these global structural rearrangements are related to tRNA discrimination by using streptomycin to restrict the conformational flexibility of the 30S subunit. The antibiotic stabilized aa-tRNA on the ribosome both with a cognate and with a near-cognate codon in the A site. Streptomycin altered the rates of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) on cognate and near-cognate codons, resulting in almost identical rates of GTP hydrolysis and virtually complete loss of selectivity. These results indicate that movements within the 30S subunit at the streptomycin-binding site are essential for the coupling between base pair recognition and GTP hydrolysis, thus modulating the fidelity of aa-tRNA selection.     

Elongation factors on the ribosome

The ribosome is a complex macromolecular assembly capable of translating mRNA sequence into amino acid sequence. The adaptor molecule of translation is tRNA, but the delivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs--the primary substrate of the ribosome--relies on the formation of a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Likewise, elongation factor G (EF-G) is required to reset the elongation cycle through the translocation of tRNAs. Recent structures and biochemical data on ribosomes in complex with the ternary complex or EF-G have shed light on the mode of action of the elongation factors, and how this interplays with the state of tRNAs and the ribosome. A model emerges of the specific routes of conformational changes mediated by tRNA and the ribosome that trigger the GTPase activity of the elongation factors on the ribosome.     

Possible evolution of factors involved in protein biosynthesis.

The elongation factors of protein biosynthesis are well preserved through out evolution. They catalyze the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis, where on the ribosome amino acids are added one at a time to a growing peptide according to the genetic information transcribed into mRNA. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) provides the binding of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome and protects the aminoester bond against hydrolysis until a correct match between the codon on mRNA and the anticodon on tRNA can be achieved. Elongation factor G (EF-G) supports the translocation of tRNAs and of mRNA on the ribosome so that a new codon can be exposed for decoding. Both these factors are GTP binding proteins, and as such exist in an active form with GTP and an inactive form with GDP bound to the nucleotide binding domain. Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) will catalyze the exchange of nucleotide on EF-Tu. This review describes structural work on EF-Tu performed in our laboratory over the last eight years. The structural results provide a rather complete picture of the major structural forms of EF-Tu, including the so called ternary complex of aa-tRNA:EF-Tu:GTP. The structural comparison of this ternary complex with the structure of EF-G:GDP displays an unexpected macromolecular mimicry, where three domains of EF-G mimick the shape of the tRNA in the ternary complex. This observation has initiated much speculation on the evolution of all factors involved in protein synthesis, as well as on the details of the ribosomal function in one part of elongation.     

Elongation factor Tu ternary complex binds to small ribosomal subunits in a functionally active state

A complex between elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, phenylalanyl-tRNA (Phe-tRNA), oligo(uridylic acid) [oligo(U)], and the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli has been formed and isolated. Binding of the EF-Tu complex appears to be at the functionally active 30S site, by all biochemical criteria that were examined. The complex can be isolated with 0.25-0.5 copy of EF-Tu bound per ribosome. The binding is dependent upon the presence of both the aminoacyl-tRNA and the cognate messenger RNA. Addition of 50S subunits to the preformed 30S-EF-Tu-GTP-Phe-tRNA-oligo(U) complex ("30S-EF-Tu complex") causes a rapid hydrolysis of GTP. This hydrolysis is coordinated with the formation of 70S ribosomes and the release of EF-Tu. Both the release of EF-Tu and the hydrolysis of GTP are stoichiometric with the amount of added 50S subunits. 70S ribosomes, in contrast to 50S subunits, neither release EF-Tu nor rapidly hydrolyze GTP when added to the 30S-EF-Tu complexes. The inability of 70S ribosomes to react with the 30S-EF-Tu complex argues that the 30S-EF-Tu complex does not dissociate prior to reaction with the 50S subunit. The requirements of the 30S reaction for Phe-tRNA and oligo(U) and the consequences of the addition of 50S subunits resemble the reaction of EF-Tu with 70S ribosomes, although EF-Tu binding to isolated 30S subunits does not occur during the elongation microcycle. This suggests that the EF-Tu ternary complex binds to isolated 30S subunits at the same 30S site that is occupied during ternary complex interaction with the 70S ribosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Multiple stages in codon-anticodon recognition: double-trigger mechanisms and geometric constraints

Thirty years of kinetic studies on tRNA selection in the elongation cycle are reviewed, and confronted with results derived from various sources, including structural studies on the ribosome, genetic observations on ribosome and EF-Tu accuracy mutants, and codon-specific elongation rates. A coherent framework is proposed, which gives meaning to many puzzling effects. Ribosomal accuracy would be governed by a "double-trigger" principle, according to which the ribosome uses energy in the forward direction to create new configurations for tRNA selection, and energy in the backward direction to regain its initial configuration, in particular after a premature dissociation event. The conformation energy would come in part, in Hopfield's mode, from GTP cleavage on the ternary complex (TC). The reset energy would be provided in part, in the author's mode, from GTP cleavage on a binary EF-Tu.GTP complex (BC). There would be several paths for amino acid incorporation. The path of highest accuracy would involve TC binding followed by BC binding, followed either by GTP hydrolysis on the TC, or by TC dissociation and GTP hydrolysis on the BC. Codon-anticodon recognition would occur in at least three kinetically and geometrically distinct stages. In a first stage, there would be a very rapid sorting of the TCs with unstrained anticodons contacting a loosely held mRNA. This stage ends with the anchoring of the codon-anticodon complex by a cluster of three nucleotides of 16S RNA. The second stage would be the most discriminative one. It would operate on the 5 ms time scale and terminate with GTP cleavage on the TC. The third stage would provide a last, crude selection involving "naked" aa-tRNA, partially held back by steric hindrance. Streptomycin and most EF-Tu mutants as well as high accuracy ribosomal mutants would produce specific alterations at stage 2, which are mapped on the stage 2 kinetic mechanism. The ram ribosomal ambiguity mutants, and anticodon position 37 modifications could be markers of stages 1 and 3 selection. Dissociation events at stage 2 or stage 3, when they are not immediately followed by reset events create a leaky state favorable to shortcut incorporation events. These events are equivalent to an "error-prone codon-anticodon mismatch repair". From the recent evidence on ribosome structure, it is conjectured that the L7/L12 flexible stalk of the large ribosome subunit acts as a proofreading gate, and that the alternation of its GTPase activation center between "TCase" competence and "BCase" competence is a main factor in the control of accuracy.     

Recognition and selection of tRNA in translation

Aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) is delivered to the ribosome in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. The stepwise movement of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu into the ribosomal A site entails a number of intermediates. The ribosome recognizes aa-tRNA through shape discrimination of the codon-anticodon duplex and regulates the rates of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu and aa-tRNA accommodation in the A site by an induced fit mechanism. Recent results of kinetic measurements, ribosome crystallography, single molecule FRET measurements, and cryo-electron microscopy suggest the mechanism of tRNA recognition and selection.     

Binding of reticulocyte elongation factor 1 to ribosomes and nucleic acids.

The present study has examined the requirements for the binding of rabbit reticulocyte elongation factor 1 (EF-1) to ribosomes under different assay conditions. When a centrifugation procedure was used to separate the ribosome EF-1 complex, the binding of EF-1 to ribosomes required GTP and Phe-tRNA, but not poly(U). The results suggested that undr these conditions a ternary complex, EF-1 . GTP . aminoacyl-tRNA, is necessary for the formation of a ribosome . EF-1 complex. However, when gel filtration was used to isolate the ribosome . EF-1 complex, only template and tRNA were required. These studie emphasize the fact that the procedure used to isolate the ribosome . EF-1 complex determines the requirements for stable complex formation. EF-1 can also interact with nucleic acids such as 28 S and 18 S rRNA, messenger RNA and DNA. In contrast to the binding to ribosomes, EF-1 binding to nucleic acids requires only Mg2+.     

Precise alignment of peptidyl tRNA by the decoding center is essential for EF-G-dependent translocation

Translocation is an essential step in the elongation cycle of the protein synthesis that allows for the continual incorporation of new amino acids to the growing polypeptide. Movement of mRNA and tRNAs within the ribosome is catalyzed by EF-G binding and GTP hydrolysis. The 30S subunit decoding center is crucial for the selection of the cognate tRNA. However, it is not clear whether the decoding center participates in translocation. We disrupted the interactions in the decoding center by mutating the universally conserved 16S rRNA bases G530, A1492, and A1493, and the effects of these mutations on translocation were studied. Our results show that point mutation of any of these 16S rRNA bases inhibits EF-G-dependent translocation. Furthermore, the mutant ribosomes showed increased puromycin reactivity in the pretranslocation complexes, indicating that the dynamic equilibrium of the peptidyl tRNA between the classical and hybrid-state configurations is influenced by contacts in the decoding center.     

Incorporation of aminoacyl-tRNA into the ribosome as seen by cryo-electron microscopy

Aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) are delivered to the ribosome as part of the ternary complex of aa-tRNA, elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) study, at a resolution of approximately 9 A, showing that during the incorporation of the aa-tRNA into the 70S ribosome of Escherichia coli, the flexibility of aa-tRNA allows the initial codon recognition and its accommodation into the ribosomal A site. In addition, a conformational change observed in the GTPase-associated center (GAC) of the ribosomal 50S subunit may provide the mechanism by which the ribosome promotes a relative movement of the aa-tRNA with respect to EF-Tu. This relative rearrangement seems to facilitate codon recognition by the incoming aa-tRNA, and to provide the codon-anticodon recognition-dependent signal for the GTPase activity of EF-Tu. From these new findings we propose a mechanism that can explain the sequence of events during the decoding of mRNA on the ribosome.     

Yeast initiator tRNA identity elements cooperate to influence multiple steps of translation initiation

All three kingdoms of life employ two methionine tRNAs, one for translation initiation and the other for insertion of methionines at internal positions within growing polypeptide chains. We have used a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system to explore the interactions of the initiator tRNA with the translation initiation machinery. Our data indicate that in addition to its previously characterized role in binding of the initiator tRNA to eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), the initiator-specific A1:U72 base pair at the top of the acceptor stem is important for the binding of the eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit. We have also shown that the initiator-specific G:C base pairs in the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA are required for the strong thermodynamic coupling between binding of the ternary complex and mRNA to the ribosome. This coupling reflects interactions that occur within the complex upon recognition of the start codon, suggesting that these initiator-specific G:C pairs influence this step. The effect of these anticodon stem identity elements is influenced by bases in the T loop of the tRNA, suggesting that conformational coupling between the D-loop-T-loop substructure and the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA may occur during AUG codon selection in the ribosomal P-site, similar to the conformational coupling that occurs in A-site tRNAs engaged in mRNA decoding during the elongation phase of protein synthesis.     

Purification and some properties of a protein binding and deacylating initiator transfer ribonucleic acid

1. A protein factor promoting the binding of initiator tRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit was purified to homogeneity (more than 2500-fold) from rat liver cytosol. It has a mol.wt. of 265000 and is composed of four subunits of identical molecular weight. 2. This factor directs the binding of methionyl-tRNA(fMet) and to a lesser extent also of N-acetylphenylalanyl-tRNA, but not of methionyl-tRNA(Met) or phenylalanyl-tRNA, to the smaller ribosomal subunit at high concentrations of GTP (8-10mm) with an optimum at pH4.0. As evidenced by sucrose-density-gradient centrifugation, initiator tRNA becomes bound to the 40S subunit or to 80S ribosomes. 3. A deacylase activity specific for methionyl-tRNA(fMet) is associated with the pure factor. The factor significantly stimulates the translation of natural message in systems containing polyribosomes and both purified peptide-elongation factors. 4. The factor binds initiator tRNA or GTP to form unstable binary complexes and forms a ternary complex with methionyl-tRNA(fMet) and GTP. This complex is relatively stable. 5. In the absence of any cofactors the factor forms a stable complex with 40S and 80S ribosomes. This preformed ribosomal complex binds efficiently initiator tRNA at pH7.5 and low concentrations of GTP (1-2mm). The ternary complex of the factor with methionyl-tRNA(fMet) and GTP may be liberated from this ribosomal complex. 6. A protein factor capable of promoting the binding and simultaneously the deacylation of initiator tRNA may apparently have a regulatory function in physiological gene translation by removing an excess of methionyl-tRNA(fMet) not required for translation.     

Initiation factor-independent translation mediated by the hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site

The hepatitis C viral mRNA initiates translation using an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) located in the 5' noncoding region of the viral genome. At physiological magnesium ion concentrations, the HCV IRES forms a binary complex with the 40S ribosomal subunit, recruits initiation factor eIF3 and the ternary eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNA(i)Met complex, and joins 60S subunits to assemble translation-competent 80S ribosomes. Here we show that in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, the HCV IRES can initiate translation by an alternative mechanism that does not require known initiation factors. Specifically, the HCV IRES was shown to initiate translation in a reconstituted system consisting only of purified 40S and 60S subunits, elongation factors, and aminoacylated tRNAs at high magnesium concentration. Analyses of assembled complexes supported a mechanism by which preformed 80S ribosomes can assemble directly on the HCV IRES at high cation concentrations. This mechanism is reminiscent of that employed by the divergent IRES elements in the Dicistroviridae, exemplified by the cricket paralysis virus, which mediates initiation of protein synthesis without initiator tRNA.     

Progression of the ribosome recycling factor through the ribosome dissociates the two ribosomal subunits

After the termination step of translation, the posttermination complex (PoTC), composed of the ribosome, mRNA, and a deacylated tRNA, is processed by the concerted action of the ribosome-recycling factor (RRF), elongation factor G (EF-G), and GTP to prepare the ribosome for a fresh round of protein synthesis. However, the sequential steps of dissociation of the ribosomal subunits, and release of mRNA and deacylated tRNA from the PoTC, are unclear. Using three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy, in conjunction with undecagold-labeled RRF, we show that RRF is capable of spontaneously moving from its initial binding site on the 70S Escherichia coli ribosome to a site exclusively on the large 50S ribosomal subunit. This movement leads to disruption of crucial intersubunit bridges and thereby to the dissociation of the two ribosomal subunits, the central event in ribosome recycling. Results of this study allow us to propose a model of ribosome recycling.     

Protein Synthesis in E. coli: Dependence of Codon-Specific Elongation on tRNA Concentration and Codon Usage

To synthesize a protein, a ribosome moves along a messenger RNA (mRNA), reads it codon by codon, and takes up the corresponding ternary complexes which consist of aminoacylated transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs), elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), and GTP. During this process of translation elongation, the ribosome proceeds with a codon-specific rate. Here, we present a general theoretical framework to calculate codon-specific elongation rates and error frequencies based on tRNA concentrations and codon usages. Our theory takes three important aspects of in-vivo translation elongation into account. First, non-cognate, near-cognate and cognate ternary complexes compete for the binding sites on the ribosomes. Second, the corresponding binding rates are determined by the concentrations of free ternary complexes, which must be distinguished from the total tRNA concentrations as measured in vivo. Third, for each tRNA species, the difference between total tRNA and ternary complex concentration depends on the codon usages of the corresponding cognate and near-cognate codons. Furthermore, we apply our theory to two alternative pathways for tRNA release from the ribosomal E site and show how the mechanism of tRNA release influences the concentrations of free ternary complexes and thus the codon-specific elongation rates. Using a recently introduced method to determine kinetic rates of in-vivo translation from in-vitro data, we compute elongation rates for all codons in Escherichia coli. We show that for some tRNA species only a few tRNA molecules are part of ternary complexes and, thus, available for the translating ribosomes. In addition, we find that codon-specific elongation rates strongly depend on the overall codon usage in the cell, which could be altered experimentally by overexpression of individual genes.