The effects of beta-arrestin1 deletion on acute cannabinoid activity,brain cannabinoid receptors and tolerance to cannabinoids in mice

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have indicated a role for beta-arrestin2 in the regulation of brain cannabinoid effects and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors, but whether beta-arrestin1 has a role has not been investigated. Objective: To determine the role of beta-arrestin1 in cannabinoid activity. Materials and methods: Beta-arrestin1 ?/? mice and their wild-type (+/+) counterparts were assayed for antinociceptive and temperature-decreasing effects of two ligands, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CP55940, after both single and repeated administration. In vitro assays examined the effects of deletion on CB₁ receptor density, agonist-binding and G-protein activation. Results: Deletion of beta-arrestin1 diminished the effects of CP55940 in both antinociception (latency to tail withdrawal) and temperature-depression assays in mice. However, deleting beta-arrestin1 had no effect on the actions of THC in either assay. Antagonist radioligand ([³H]SR141716A) saturation binding indicated no difference between beta-arrestin1 +/+ and ?/? mice in the density or affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain membranes. CP55940 agonist binding in brain membranes from beta-arrestin1 +/+ mice exhibited high- and intermediate-affinity sites, but beta-arrestin1 ?/? membranes exhibited an additional site with low affinity. CP55940 produced greater stimulation of [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to membranes from whole brain of beta-arrestin1 ?/? than +/+ mice. The rates of the development of tolerance to chronic THC or CP55940 administration did not appear to be affected by genotype. Discussion: Beta-arrestin1 appeared to mediate the actions of CP55940, but did not affect the activity of THC. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin1 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptor sensitivity in an agonist-selective manner, but may not be the primary mediator of tolerance to cannabinoid agonists.     

Cognitive Impairment Induced by Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol Occurs through Heteromers between Cannabinoid CB1 and Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptors

Activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors (CB₁R) by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produces a variety of negative effects with major consequences in cannabis users that constitute important drawbacks for the use of cannabinoids as therapeutic agents. For this reason, there is a tremendous medical interest in harnessing the beneficial effects of THC. Behavioral studies carried out in mice lacking 5-HT_2A receptors (5-HT_2AR) revealed a remarkable 5-HT_2AR-dependent dissociation in the beneficial antinociceptive effects of THC and its detrimental amnesic properties. We found that specific effects of THC such as memory deficits, anxiolytic-like effects, and social interaction are under the control of 5-HT_2AR, but its acute hypolocomotor, hypothermic, anxiogenic, and antinociceptive effects are not. In biochemical studies, we show that CB₁R and 5-HT_2AR form heteromers that are expressed and functionally active in specific brain regions involved in memory impairment. Remarkably, our functional data shows that costimulation of both receptors by agonists reduces cell signaling, antagonist binding to one receptor blocks signaling of the interacting receptor, and heteromer formation leads to a switch in G-protein coupling for 5-HT_2AR from Gq to Gi proteins. Synthetic peptides with the sequence of transmembrane helices 5 and 6 of CB₁R, fused to a cell-penetrating peptide, were able to disrupt receptor heteromerization in vivo, leading to a selective abrogation of memory impairments caused by exposure to THC. These data reveal a novel molecular mechanism for the functional interaction between CB₁R and 5-HT_2AR mediating cognitive impairment. CB₁R-5-HT_2AR heteromers are thus good targets to dissociate the cognitive deficits induced by THC from its beneficial antinociceptive properties.     

THC Prevents MDMA Neurotoxicity in Mice

The majority of MDMA (ecstasy) recreational users also consume cannabis. Despite the rewarding effects that both drugs have, they induce several opposite pharmacological responses. MDMA causes hyperthermia, oxidative stress and neuronal damage, especially at warm ambient temperature. However, THC, the main psychoactive compound of cannabis, produces hypothermic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Therefore, THC may have a neuroprotective effect against MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. Mice receiving a neurotoxic regimen of MDMA (20 mg/kg ×4) were pretreated with THC (3 mg/kg ×4) at room (21°C) and at warm (26°C) temperature, and body temperature, striatal glial activation and DA terminal loss were assessed. To find out the mechanisms by which THC may prevent MDMA hyperthermia and neurotoxicity, the same procedure was carried out in animals pretreated with the CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251 and the CB₂ receptor antagonist AM630, as well as in CB₁, CB₂ and CB₁/CB₂ deficient mice. THC prevented MDMA-induced-hyperthermia and glial activation in animals housed at both room and warm temperature. Surprisingly, MDMA-induced DA terminal loss was only observed in animals housed at warm but not at room temperature, and this neurotoxic effect was reversed by THC administration. However, THC did not prevent MDMA-induced hyperthermia, glial activation, and DA terminal loss in animals treated with the CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251, neither in CB₁ and CB₁/CB₂ knockout mice. On the other hand, THC prevented MDMA-induced hyperthermia and DA terminal loss, but only partially suppressed glial activation in animals treated with the CB₂ cannabinoid antagonist and in CB₂ knockout animals. Our results indicate that THC protects against MDMA neurotoxicity, and suggest that these neuroprotective actions are primarily mediated by the reduction of hyperthermia through the activation of CB₁ receptor, although CB₂ receptors may also contribute to attenuate neuroinflammation in this process.     

Fetal cannabinoid receptors and the “dis‐joint‐ed” brain

Microtubule turnover in the growing axons is required for directional axonal growth and synapse formation in the developing brain. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Tortoriello et al ( 2014 ) show that the microtubule‐binding protein SCG10/stathmin‐2 is a specific molecular target for a CB₁ receptor‐mediated effect of Δ⁹‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive ingredient of smoked marijuana, in the fetal brain. Considering the role of CB₁ in modulating the specification and long‐distance migration of neurons in the perinatal brain, this study reveals an interesting mechanism potentially accounting for connectivity deficits during cortical development following exposure to CB₁ agonists or THC during pregnancy.     

Miswiring the brain: Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol disrupts cortical development by inducing an SCG10/stathmin‐2 degradation pathway

Children exposed in utero to cannabis present permanent neurobehavioral and cognitive impairments. Psychoactive constituents from Cannabis spp., particularly Δ⁹‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), bind to cannabinoid receptors in the fetal brain. However, it is unknown whether THC can trigger a cannabinoid receptor‐driven molecular cascade to disrupt neuronal specification. Here, we show that repeated THC exposure disrupts endocannabinoid signaling, particularly the temporal dynamics of CB₁ cannabinoid receptor, to rewire the fetal cortical circuitry. By interrogating the THC‐sensitive neuronal proteome we identify Superior Cervical Ganglion 10 (SCG10)/stathmin‐2, a microtubule‐binding protein in axons, as a substrate of altered neuronal connectivity. We find SCG10 mRNA and protein reduced in the hippocampus of midgestational human cannabis‐exposed fetuses, defining SCG10 as the first cannabis‐driven molecular effector in the developing cerebrum. CB₁ cannabinoid receptor activation recruits c‐Jun N‐terminal kinases to phosphorylate SCG10, promoting its rapid degradation in situ in motile axons and microtubule stabilization. Thus, THC enables ectopic formation of filopodia and alters axon morphology. These data highlight the maintenance of cytoskeletal dynamics as a molecular target for cannabis, whose imbalance can limit the computational power of neuronal circuitries in affected offspring.     

The influence of beta-arrestin2 on cannabinoid CB1 receptor coupling to G-proteins and subcellular localization and relative levels of beta-arrestin1 and 2 in mouse brain

Abstract

Context: Beta-arrestins are known to couple to some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate receptor internalization, G-protein coupling and signal transduction, but have not been investigated for most receptors, and for very few receptors in vivo. Previous studies have shown that beta-arrestin2 deletion enhances the efficacy of specific cannabinoid agonists. Objective: The present study hypothesized that brain cannabinoid CB₁ receptors are regulated by beta-arrestin2. Methods: Beta-arrestin2+/+ and ?/? mice were used. Western blotting was used to determine the relative levels of each beta-arrestin subtype in mouse brain. Receptor binding was measured to determine whether deletion of beta-arrestin2 influences agonist binding to brain CB₁ receptors, or the subcellular localization of CB₁ in brain membranes subjected to differential centrifugation. A variety of cannabinoid agonists from different chemical classes were investigated for their ability to activate G-proteins in the presence and absence of beta-arrestin2 in cerebellum, hippocampus and cortex. Results: No differences were found in the density of beta-arrestin1 or cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in several brains of beta-arrestin2+/+ versus ?/? mice. Differences between genotypes were found in the proportion of high- and low-affinity agonist binding sites in brain areas that naturally express higher levels of beta-arrestin2. Cortex from beta-arrestin2?/? mice contained less CB₁ in the P1 fraction and more CB₁ in the P2 fraction compared to beta-arrestin2+/+. Of the agonists assayed for activity, only Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exhibited a difference between genotypes, in that it was less efficacious in beta-arrestin2?/? than +/+ mouse membranes. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin2 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain.     

Quantitative mapping of cocaine-induced ΔFosB expression in the striatum of male and female rats

ΔFosB plays a critical role in drug-induced long-term changes in the brain. In the current study, we evaluated locomotor activity in male and female rats treated with saline or cocaine for 2 weeks and quantitatively mapped ΔFosB expression in the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens of each animal by using an anti-FosB antibody that recognizes ΔFosB isoforms preferentially. Behavioral analysis showed that while there was little difference between males and females that sensitized to cocaine, nonsensitizing rats showed a large sex difference. Nonsensitizing males showed low behavioral activation in response to cocaine on the first day of treatment, and their activity remained low. In contrast, nonsensitizing females showed high activation on the first day of treatment and their activity remained high. Western blot and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that basal levels of ΔFosB were higher in the nucleus accumbens than the dorsal striatum, but that the effect of cocaine on ΔFosB was greater in the dorsal striatum. Immunostaining showed that the effect of cocaine in both the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens was primarily to increase the intensity of ΔFosB immunoreactivity in individual neurons, rather than to increase the number of cells that express ΔFosB. Detailed mapping of ΔFosB-labeled nuclei showed that basal ΔFosB levels were highest in the medial portion of the dorsal striatum and dorsomedial accumbens, particularly adjacent to the lateral ventricle, whereas the cocaine-induced increase in ΔFosB was most pronounced in the lateral dorsal striatum, where basal ΔFosB expression was lowest. Sex differences in ΔFosB expression were small and independent of cocaine treatment. We discuss implications of the sex difference in locomotor activation and regionally-specific ΔFosB induction by cocaine.     

The monoacylglycerol lipase inhibitor JZL184 suppresses inflammatory pain in the mouse carrageenan model

AimThe present study tested whether the selective monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) inhibitor JZL184 would reduce allodynia and paw edema in the carrageenan test.Main methodsThe anti-edematous and anti-allodynic effects of JZL184 were compared to those of PF-3845, an inhibitor of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), and diclofenac, a non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor. Cannabinoid receptor involvement in the anti-edematous and anti-allodynic effects of JZL184 was evaluated by administration of the respective CB₁ and CB₂ receptor antagonists rimonabant and SR144528 as well as with CB₁(?/?) and CB₂(?/?) mice. JZL184 (1.6, 4, 16, or 40 mg/kg) was administered for six days to assess tolerance.Key findingsJZL184 administered before or after carrageenan significantly attenuated carrageenan-induced paw edema and mechanical allodynia. Complementary genetic and pharmacological approaches revealed that the anti-allodynic effects of JZL184 required both CB₁ and CB₂ receptors, but only CB₂ receptors mediated its anti-edematous actions. Importantly, both the anti-edematous and anti-allodynic effects underwent tolerance following repeated injections of high dose JZL184 (16 or 40 mg/kg), but repeated administration of low dose JZL184 (4 mg/kg) retained efficacy.SignificanceThese results suggest that the MAGL inhibitor JZL184 reduces inflammatory nociception through the activation of both CB₁ and CB₂ receptors, with no evidence of tolerance following repeated administration of low doses.     

Mechanistic origin of partial agonism of tetrahydrocannabinol for cannabinoid receptors

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) is a therapeutically relevant drug target for controlling pain, obesity, and other central nervous system disorders. However, full agonists and antagonists of CB₁ have been reported to cause serious side effects in patients. Therefore, partial agonists have emerged as a viable alternative as they can mitigate overstimulation and side effects. One of the key bottlenecks in the design of partial agonists, however, is the lack of understanding of the molecular mechanism of partial agonism itself. In this study, we examine two mechanistic hypotheses for the origin of partial agonism in cannabinoid receptors and predict the mechanistic basis of partial agonism exhibited by Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) against CB₁. In particular, we inspect whether partial agonism emerges from the ability of THC to bind in both agonist and antagonist-binding poses or from its ability to only partially activate the receptor. We used extensive molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state modeling to capture the THC binding in both antagonist and agonist-binding poses in the CB₁ receptor. Furthermore, we predict that binding of THC in the agonist-binding pose leads to rotation of toggle switch residues and causes partial outward movement of intracellular transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). Our simulations also suggest that the alkyl side chain of THC plays a crucial role in determining partial agonism by stabilizing the ligand in the agonist and antagonist-like poses within the pocket. Taken together, this study provides important insights into the mechanistic origin of the partial agonism of THC.     

Receptor heteromerization expands the repertoire of cannabinoid signaling in rodent neurons

A fundamental question in G protein coupled receptor biology is how a single ligand acting at a specific receptor is able to induce a range of signaling that results in a variety of physiological responses. We focused on Type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB₁R) as a model GPCR involved in a variety of processes spanning from analgesia and euphoria to neuronal development, survival and differentiation. We examined receptor dimerization as a possible mechanism underlying expanded signaling responses by a single ligand and focused on interactions between CB₁R and delta opioid receptor (DOR). Using co-immunoprecipitation assays as well as analysis of changes in receptor subcellular localization upon co-expression, we show that CB₁R and DOR form receptor heteromers. We find that heteromerization affects receptor signaling since the potency of the CB₁R ligand to stimulate G-protein activity is increased in the absence of DOR, suggesting that the decrease in CB₁R activity in the presence of DOR could, at least in part, be due to heteromerization. We also find that the decrease in activity is associated with enhanced PLC-dependent recruitment of arrestin3 to the CB₁R-DOR complex, suggesting that interaction with DOR enhances arrestin-mediated CB₁R desensitization. Additionally, presence of DOR facilitates signaling via a new CB₁R-mediated anti-apoptotic pathway leading to enhanced neuronal survival. Taken together, these results support a role for CB₁R-DOR heteromerization in diversification of endocannabinoid signaling and highlight the importance of heteromer-directed signal trafficking in enhancing the repertoire of GPCR signaling.     

GABAergic and cortical and subcortical glutamatergic axon terminals contain CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus

Background

Type-1 cannabinoid receptors (CB₁R) are enriched in the hypothalamus, particularly in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH) that participates in homeostatic and behavioral functions including food intake. Although CB₁R activation modulates excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in the brain, CB₁R contribution to the molecular architecture of the excitatory and inhibitory synaptic terminals in the VMH is not known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the precise subcellular distribution of CB₁R in the VMH to better understand the modulation exerted by the endocannabinoid system on the complex brain circuitries converging into this nucleus.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Light and electron microscopy techniques were used to analyze CB₁R distribution in the VMH of CB₁R-WT, CB₁R-KO and conditional mutant mice bearing a selective deletion of CB₁R in cortical glutamatergic (Glu-CB₁R-KO) or GABAergic neurons (GABA-CB₁R-KO). At light microscopy, CB₁R immunolabeling was observed in the VMH of CB₁R-WT and Glu-CB₁R-KO animals, being remarkably reduced in GABA-CB₁R-KO mice. In the electron microscope, CB₁R appeared in membranes of both glutamatergic and GABAergic terminals/preterminals. There was no significant difference in the percentage of CB₁R immunopositive profiles and CB₁R density in terminals making asymmetric or symmetric synapses in CB₁R-WT mice. Furthermore, the proportion of CB₁R immunopositive terminals/preterminals in CB₁R-WT and Glu-CB₁R-KO mice was reduced in GABA-CB₁R-KO mutants. CB₁R density was similar in all animal conditions. Finally, the percentage of CB₁R labeled boutons making asymmetric synapses slightly decreased in Glu-CB₁R-KO mutants relative to CB₁R-WT mice, indicating that CB₁R was distributed in cortical and subcortical excitatory synaptic terminals.

Conclusions/Significance

Our anatomical results support the idea that the VMH is a relevant hub candidate in the endocannabinoid-mediated modulation of the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission of cortical and subcortical pathways regulating essential hypothalamic functions for the individual''s survival such as the feeding behavior.     

Modulation of Pilocarpine-Induced Seizures by Cannabinoid Receptor 1

Administration of the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine is commonly used to induce seizures in rodents for the study of epilepsy. Activation of muscarinic receptors has been previously shown to increase the production of endocannabinoids in the brain. Endocannabinoids act at the cannabinoid CB₁ receptors to reduce neurotransmitter release and the severity of seizures in several models of epilepsy. In this study, we determined the effect of CB₁ receptor activity on the induction in mice of seizures by pilocarpine. We found that decreased activation of the CB₁ receptor, either through genetic deletion of the receptor or treatment with a CB₁ antagonist, increased pilocarpine seizure severity without modifying seizure-induced cell proliferation and cell death. These results indicate that endocannabinoids act at the CB₁ receptor to modulate the severity of pilocarpine-induced seizures. Administration of a CB₁ agonist produced characteristic CB₁-dependent behavioral responses, but did not affect pilocarpine seizure severity. A possible explanation for the lack of effect of CB₁ agonist administration on pilocarpine seizures, despite the effects of CB₁ antagonist administration and CB₁ gene deletion, is that muscarinic receptor-stimulated endocannabinoid production is acting maximally at CB₁ receptors to modulate sensitivity to pilocarpine seizures.     

Synthesis of oxidative metabolites of CRA13 and their analogs: Identification of CRA13 active metabolites and analogs thereof with selective CB2R affinity

CRA13; a peripheral dual CB₁R/CB₂R agonist with clinically proven analgesic properties, infiltrates into CNS producing adverse effects due to central CB₁R agonism. Such adverse effects might be circumvented by less lipophilic compounds with attenuated CB₁R affinity. Metabolism produces less lipophilic metabolites that might be active metabolites. Some CRA13 oxidative metabolites and their analogues were synthesized as less lipophilic CRA13 analogues. Probing their CB₁R and CB₂R activity revealed the alcohol metabolite 8c as a more potent and more effective CB₂R ligand with attenuated CB₁R affinity relative to CRA13. Also, the alcohol analogue 8b and methyl ester 12a possessed enhanced CB₂R affinity and reduced CB₁R affinity. The CB₂R binding affinity of alcohol analogue 8b was similar to CRA13 while that of methyl ester 12a was more potent. In silico study provided insights into the possible molecular interactions that might explain the difference in the elicited biological activity of these compounds.     

Striatal CB1 and D2 receptors regulate expression of each other,CRIP1A and delta opioid systems

Although biochemical and physiological evidence suggests a strong interaction between striatal CB₁ cannabinoid (CB₁R) and D₂ dopamine (D₂R) receptors, the mechanisms are poorly understood. We targeted medium spiny neurons of the indirect pathway using shRNA to knockdown either CB₁R or D₂R. Chronic reduction in either receptor resulted in deficits in gene and protein expression for the alternative receptor and concomitantly increased expression of the cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a (CRIP1a), suggesting a novel role for CRIP1a in dopaminergic systems. Both CB₁R and D₂R knockdown reduced striatal dopaminergic‐stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding, and D₂R knockdown reduced pallidal WIN55212‐2‐stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding. Decreased D₂R and CB₁R activity was associated with decreased striatal phosphoERK. A decrease in mRNA for opioid peptide precursors pDYN and pENK accompanied knockdown of CB₁Rs or D₂Rs, and over‐expression of CRIP1a. Down‐regulation in opioid peptide mRNAs was followed in time by increased DOR1 but not MOR1 expression, leading to increased [D‐Pen2, D‐Pen5]‐enkephalin‐stimulated [³⁵S]GTPγS binding in the striatum. We conclude that mechanisms intrinsic to striatal medium spiny neurons or extrinsic via the indirect pathway adjust for changes in CB₁R or D₂R levels by modifying the expression and signaling capabilities of the alternative receptor as well as CRIP1a and the DELTA opioid system.     

Cannabinoid Receptor CB2 Modulates Axon Guidance

Navigation of retinal projections towards their targets is regulated by guidance molecules and growth cone transduction mechanisms. Here, we present in vitro and in vivo evidences that the cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB₂R) is expressed along the retino-thalamic pathway and exerts a modulatory action on axon guidance. These effects are specific to CB₂R since no changes were observed in mice where the gene coding for this receptor was altered (cnr2 ^−/−). The CB₂R induced morphological changes observed at the growth cone are PKA dependent and require the presence of the netrin-1 receptor, Deleted in Colorectal Cancer. Interfering with endogenous CB₂R signalling using pharmacological agents increased retinal axon length and induced aberrant projections. Additionally, cnr2 ^−/− mice showed abnormal eye-specific segregation of retinal projections in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) indicating CB₂R’s implication in retinothalamic development. Overall, this study demonstrates that the contribution of endocannabinoids to brain development is not solely mediated by CB₁R, but also involves CB₂R.     

Ocular Disposition of ∆<Superscript>8</Superscript>-Tetrahydrocannabinol from Various Topical Ophthalmic Formulations

The purposes of this project are to enhance the trans-membrane penetration of Δ⁸-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁸-THC) and to study the effect of various lipid based systems in delivering the compound, non-invasively, to anterior and posterior ocular chambers. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), fast gelling films were manufactured using high pressure homogenization and melt cast techniques, respectively. The formulations were characterized for drug content, entrapment efficiency, particle size and subsequently evaluated in vitro for trans-corneal permeation. In vivo, the drug disposition was tested via topical administration in albino rabbits. The eye globes were enucleated at the end of experiment and tissues were analyzed for drug content. All formulations showed favorable physicochemical characteristics in terms of particle size, entrapment efficiency, and drug content. In vitro, the formulations exhibited a transcorneal flux that depended on the formulation’s drug load. An increase in drug load from 0.1 to 0.75% resulted in 12- to16-folds increase in permeation. In vivo, the film was able to deliver THC to all the tissues with high accumulations in cornea and sclera. The SLNs showed a greater ability in delivering THC to all the tissues, at a significantly lower drug load, due to their colloidal size range, which in turn enhanced corneal epithelial membrane penetration. The topical formulations evaluated in the present study were able to successfully deliver Δ⁸-THC in therapeutically meaningful concentrations (EC₅₀ values for CB₁: 6 nM and CB₂: 0.4 nM) to all ocular tissues except the vitreous humor, with pronounced tissue penetration achieved using SLNs as a Δ⁸-THC delivery vehicle.