Co-Evolution of Somatic Variation in Primary and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer May Expand Biopsy Indications in the Molecular Era

IntroductionMetastasis is thought to be a clonal event whereby a single cell initiates the development of a new tumor at a distant site. However the degree to which primary and metastatic tumors differ on a molecular level remains unclear. To further evaluate these concepts, we used next generation sequencing (NGS) to assess the molecular composition of paired primary and metastatic colorectal cancer tissue specimens.Methods468 colorectal tumor samples from a large personalized medicine initiative were assessed by targeted gene sequencing of 1,321 individual genes. Eighteen patients produced genomic profiles for 17 paired primary:metastatic (and 2 metastatic:metastatic) specimens.ResultsAn average of 33.3 mutations/tumor were concordant (shared) between matched samples, including common well-known genes (APC, KRAS, TP53). An average of 2.3 mutations/tumor were discordant (unshared) among paired sites. KRAS mutational status was always concordant. The overall concordance rate for mutations was 93.5%; however, nearly all (18/19 (94.7%)) paired tumors showed at least one mutational discordance. Mutations were seen in: TTN, the largest gene (5 discordant pairs), ADAMTS20, APC, MACF1, RASA1, TP53, and WNT2 (2 discordant pairs), SMAD2, SMAD3, SMAD4, FBXW7, and 66 others (1 discordant pair).ConclusionsWhereas primary and metastatic tumors displayed little variance overall, co-evolution produced incremental mutations in both. These results suggest that while biopsy of the primary tumor alone is likely sufficient in the chemotherapy-naïve patient, additional biopsies of primary or metastatic disease may be necessary to precisely tailor therapy following chemotherapy resistance or insensitivity in order to adequately account for tumor evolution.     

Prognostic value of circulating KRAS2 gene mutations in colorectal cancer with distant metastases

While tissue KRAS2 mutations have been extensively investigated, the role of circulating mutant KRAS2 gene in patients with colorectal carcinoma remains obscure. The aim of the present study was to explore the prognostic significance of circulating KRAS2 gene mutational status in subjects undergoing primary treatment for colorectal cancer. Codon 12 KRAS2 mutations were examined in DNA samples extracted from the serum of 86 patients with colorectal cancer and were compared with the KRAS2 status of their primary tumors. Tissue and serum KRAS2 status was compared with other clinicopathological variables (including CEA and CA 19-9 levels) and with cancer-related survival. KRAS2 mutations were found in tissue samples of 28 patients (33%); serum KRAS2 mutations were detected in 10 of them (36%). Serum KRAS2 status was significantly associated with Dukes' stage D (p=0.001) and with preoperative CA 19-9 levels (p=0.01). At multivariate analysis, cancer-related survival was associated with Dukes' stage (p<0.0001), CEA level (p=0.02), and mutant circulating KRAS2 (p=0.01). All 7 stage D patients with serum KRAS2 mutations died of the disease within 24 months of primary treatment; cancer-related survival was significantly better in 9 stage D patients without serum KRAS2 mutations, with 5 patients (56%) alive after 24 months and 1 patient (13%) alive after 44 months. Residual disease after surgery was evident in all 7 stage D patients with mutant circulating KRAS2, and in 5 out of 9 stage D patients without serum mutations. Serum KRAS2 status may impact substantially on the management of stage D colorectal carcinoma, since it appears to cor-relate with prognosis in this patient subgroup.     

Intra-tumoral heterogeneity of KRAS and BRAF mutation status in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) and cost-effectiveness of multiple sample testing

KRAS mutation status is established as a predictive biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFr therapies. Mutations are normally assessed using DNA extracted from one formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor block. We assessed heterogeneity of KRAS and BRAF mutation status intra-tumorally (multiple blocks from the same primary tumor). We also investigated the utility and efficiency of genotyping a 'DNA cocktail' prepared from multiple blocks. We studied 68 consenting patients in two randomized clinical trials. DNA was extracted, from ≥2 primary tumor FFPE blocks per patient. DNA was genotyped by pyrosequencing for KRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 and BRAF codon 600. In patients with heterogeneous mutation status, DNA cocktails were prepared and genotyped. Among 69 primary tumors in 68 patients, 7 (10.1%) showed intratumoral heterogeneity; 5 (7.2%) at KRAS codons 12, 13 and 2 (2.9%) at BRAF codon 600. In patients displaying heterogeneity, the relevant KRAS or BRAF mutation was also identified in 'DNA cocktail' samples when including DNA from mutant and wild-type blocks. Heterogeneity is uncommon but not insignificant. Testing DNA from a single block will wrongly assign wild-type status to 10% patients. Testing more than one block, or preferably preparation of a 'DNA cocktail' from two or more tumor blocks, improves mutation detection at minimal extra cost.     

Role of Kras Status in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab: A TTD Group Cooperative Study

Background

In the MACRO study, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were randomised to first-line treatment with 6 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) plus bevacizumab followed by either single-agent bevacizumab or XELOX plus bevacizumab until disease progression. An additional retrospective analysis was performed to define the prognostic value of tumour KRAS status on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates.

Methodology/Principal Findings

KRAS data (tumour KRAS status and type of mutation) were collected by questionnaire from participating centres that performed KRAS analyses. These data were then cross-referenced with efficacy data for relevant patients in the MACRO study database. KRAS status was analysed in 394 of the 480 patients (82.1%) in the MACRO study. Wild-type (WT) KRAS tumours were found in 219 patients (56%) and mutant (MT) KRAS in 175 patients (44%). Median PFS was 10.9 months for patients with WT KRAS and 9.4 months for patients with MT KRAS tumours (p = 0.0038; HR: 1.40; 95% CI:1.12–1.77). The difference in OS was also significant: 26.7 months versus 18.0 months for WT versus MT KRAS, respectively (p = 0.0002; HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.23–1.96). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that KRAS was an independent variable for both PFS and OS. Responses were observed in 126 patients (57.5%) with WT KRAS tumours and 76 patients (43.4%) with MT KRAS tumours (p = 0.0054; OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.18–2.64).

Conclusions/Significance

This analysis of the MACRO study suggests a prognostic role for tumour KRAS status in patients with mCRC treated with XELOX plus bevacizumab. For both PFS and OS, KRAS status was an independent factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.     

Prospective analysis of KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 treatment regimens

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has proven to be efficient in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We made a prospective study of the efficacy and toxicities of cetuximab-combination first-line (FOLFOX4) versus second/third-line (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy in 98 KRAS wild-type patients who had metastatic colorectal cancer. Wild-type KRAS had been identified by direct sequencing. Associations between clinical response/progression-free survival/overall survival/toxicities and cetuximab-combination chemotherapy timing were evaluated. The overall response rate was significantly higher for first-line treatment than for second/third-line treatment (relative risk = 1.707, 95% confidence interval = 1.121-2.598). Both progression-free survival and overall survival indicated significantly longer survival of first-line treatment than second/third-line treatment patients. This study is a validation of a molecular analysis of KRAS wild-type status for the prediction of response to cetuximab-combination chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients; its predictive role was less prominent in the second/third-line than in the first-line treatment patients.     

Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy Might Provide Longer Progression-Free Survival in KRAS Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The identification of better regimens in currently available chemotherapeutic agents is crucial for treating patients with KRAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Records of mCRC patients who received first-line oxaliplatin- based or irinotecan-based regimens were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic features and treatment outcome of patients with first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in association with KRAS mutation status were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Between 2007 and 2010, a total of 118 mCRC patients were enrolled. Among them, 67 were males and 51 were females. In patients who received first-line oxaliplatin-based regimens, the PFS was significantly longer in KRAS mutant patients (N = 32) than that in KRAS wild-type patients (N = 51). The median PFS was 8.5 months in KRAS mutant versus 5.8 months in KRAS wild-type patients (P = .008). In contrast, in patients who received first-line irinotecan-based regimens, the PFS was shorter in KRAS mutant patients (N = 15) than that in KRAS wild-type patients (N = 20). Median PFS was 3.9 months in KRAS mutant versus 6.0 months in KRAS wild-type patients (P = .23). Median OS between KRAS mutant and wild-type patients was not significantly different in both oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based regimens. In multivariate analyses, KRAS mutation remains an independent predictive factor for longer PFS in first-line oxaliplatin-based regimens. In conclusion, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in KRAS mutant mCRC might result in longer PFS than in KRAS wild-type mCRC.     

KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting

KRAS testing is relevant for the choice of the most appropriate first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Strategies for preventing unequal access to the test should be implemented, but their relevance in the practice is related to economic sustainability. The study adopted the Delphi technique to reach a consensus on several topics. Issues related to execution of KRAS testing were identified by an expert’s board and proposed to 108 Italian oncologists and pathologists through two subsequent questionnaires. The emerging proposal was evaluated by decision analyses models employed by technology assessment agencies in order to assess cost-effectiveness. Alternative therapeutic strategies included most commonly used chemotherapy regimens alone or in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab. The survey indicated that time interval for obtaining KRAS test should not exceed 15 days, 10 days being an optimal interval. To assure the access to proper treatment, a useful strategy should be to anticipate the test after radical resection in patients at high risk of relapse. Early KRAS testing in high risk CRC patients generates incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 6,000 and 13,000 Euro per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In extensive sensitivity analyses ICER’s were always below 15,000 Euro per QALY gained, far within the threshold of 60,000 Euro/QALY gained accepted by regulatory institutions in Italy. In metastatic CRC a time interval higher than 15 days for result of KRAS testing limits access to therapeutic choices. Anticipating KRAS testing before the onset of metastatic disease in patients at high risk does not affect the sustainability and cost-effectiveness profile of cetuximab in first-line mCRC. Early KRAS testing may prevent this inequality in high-risk patients, whether they develop metastases, and is a cost-effective strategy. Based on these results, present joined recommendations of Italian societies of Oncology and Pathology should be updated including early KRAS testing.     

Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer

Colon cancer is the second most prevalent lethal cancer. The main cause for high mortality rate is that the prognosis for progressed metastatic colon cancer is most unfavorable. Recent data suggest that disease outcome can be further improved by the addition of targeted biological agents to the first- or second-line treatment. As a result of molecularly targeted anti-EGFR therapies (cetuximab and panitumumab) complementing chemotherapy, liver metastases can reduce in size and become operable in certain patients, which can contribute to the complete recovery of the patient. The main problem, however, is the fact that a positive response only occurs in one third of the patients, even in the case of chemotherapy combined protocol, and the side effects are considerable. For the application of individually tailored treatments, it is an urgent need to develop a system of biomarkers that can predict the effect of treatment and provide information about the optimal selection of both chemotherapy and biological treatment. It should be clarified what the most important requirements of a good and reliable biomarker are. As currently there is no precise predictive molecular diagnostics at our disposal, oncologists have to make one of two choices: they treat a large number of patients with anti-EGFR agents which has negative effects on the quality of life and also reduces the patient's chances of getting appropriate treatment or, if the oncologists refuse to take risks, they omit the use of anti-EGFR treatment in which case those patients for whom this would have been the appropriate treatment are also denied the chance of short-term survival or recovery. Clinical data (response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS)) of 130 colorectal cancer patients have been retrospectively analyzed. Patients have received different chemotherapy protocols in combination with anti-VEGF antibody or with anti-EGFR antibody therapies. EGFR expression was evaluated with immunohistochemistry, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated by direct sequencing and high resolution melting analysis in the archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The study found similar efficacy of first-line therapeutic protocols. Protocols combining chemotherapy with biological therapies achieved better overall survival but this difference was not significant (OS: 35.9 versus 36.7 months). The frequency of KRAS mutations was 44% (n=100). None of the KRAS mutant tumors responded to the anti-EGFR monotherapy. TTP in the case of cetuximab monotherapy was twice longer (208 months) than in the KRAS mutant tumors (104 months). One BRAF mutant tumor was also identified (4%) This tumor was also resistant to cetuximab monotherapy. The KRAS and BRAF mutations excluded each other. Except one case, the KRAS status was identical in both the primary tumor and the metastasis. In contrast, PIK3CA mutations were heterogeneous in different tumor samples. In 5 out of 6 cases the mutation status of PIK3CA was different in the primary tumor and the metastasis. New biological therapies provide an additional clinical benefit only for a subset of patients. We need biomarkers to identify these patients. KRAS and most probably BRAF testing can double the efficacy of the anti-EGFR therapies, but we need additional molecular diagnostic tests. PIK3CA is an important candidate but we might need to take biopsy directly from the metastasis or we have to evaluate the circulating tumor cells to judge the molecular status of distant metastasis.     

Mutational Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells from Colorectal Cancer Patients and Correlation with Primary Tumor Tissue

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) provide a non-invasive accessible source of tumor material from patients with cancer. The cellular heterogeneity within CTC populations is of great clinical importance regarding the increasing number of adjuvant treatment options for patients with metastatic carcinomas, in order to eliminate residual disease. Moreover, the molecular profiling of these rare cells might lead to insight on disease progression and therapeutic strategies than simple CTCs counting. In the present study we investigated the feasibility to detect KRAS, BRAF, CD133 and Plastin3 (PLS3) mutations in an enriched CTCs cell suspension from patients with colorectal cancer, with the hypothesis that these genes` mutations are of great importance regarding the generation of CTCs subpopulations. Subsequently, we compared CTCs mutational status with that of the corresponding primary tumor, in order to access the possibility of tumor cells characterization without biopsy. CTCs were detected and isolated from blood drawn from 52 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using a quantum-dot-labelled magnetic immunoassay method. Mutations were detected by PCR-RFLP or allele-specific PCR and confirmed by direct sequencing. In 52 patients, discordance between primary tumor and CTCs was 5.77% for KRAS, 3.85% for BRAF, 11.54% for CD133 rs3130, 7.69% for CD133 rs2286455 and 11.54% for PLS3 rs6643869 mutations. Our results support that DNA mutational analysis of CTCs may enable non-invasive, specific biomarker diagnostics and expand the scope of personalized medicine for cancer patients.     

Colorectal Cancer Patients with Low Abundance of KRAS Mutation May Benefit from EGFR Antibody Therapy

Epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody was approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients carrying KRAS wild type DNA. However, recent studies showed that patients with KRAS G13D mutation may benefit from EGFR antibody therapy. In this study we tried to explore whether the abundance of KRAS mutation could affect the efficacy of EGFR antibody therapy. We firstly established a PNA-PCR method which could calculate the percentage of KRAS mutation in total DNA and proved its ability on 47 colorectal cancer samples bearing KRAS mutations. Then we analyzed the correlation between the abundance of KRAS mutations and efficacy of EGFR antibody therapy in another 35 metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We proved that PNA-PCR assay could calculate the abundance of KRAS mutation and the percentage of mutant DNA in tumor cells varied a lot (10.8%∼98.3%) on the 47 colorectal cancer patients. The efficacy of EGFR antibody correlated with the abundance of KRAS mutations: in the KRAS mutation less than 30% group, the disease control rate was 44.4% (4/9); the disease control rate of 30∼80% group was 5.6% (1/18) and the >80% group was 12.5% (1/8) (P = 0.038). In summary, our study showed that PNA-PCR method could easily detect the percentage of KRAS mutation in tumor cells and colorectal cancer patients with low abundance of KRAS mutation might benefit from EGFR antibody therapy.     

Identification of O-Linked Glycoproteins Binding to the Lectin Helix pomatia Agglutinin as Markers of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

Protein glycosylation is an important post-translational modification shown to be altered in all tumour types studied to date. Mucin glycoproteins have been established as important carriers of O-linked glycans but other glycoproteins exhibiting altered glycosylation repertoires have yet to be identified but offer potential as biomarkers for metastatic cancer.

Methodology

In this study a glycoproteomic approach was used to identify glycoproteins exhibiting alterations in glycosylation in colorectal cancer and to evaluate the changes in O-linked glycosylation in the context of the p53 and KRAS (codon 12/13) mutation status. Affinity purification with the carbohydrate binding protein from Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA) was coupled to 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis with mass spectrometry to enable the identification of low abundance O-linked glycoproteins from human colorectal cancer specimens.

Results

Aberrant O-linked glycosylation was observed to be an early event that occurred irrespective of the p53 and KRAS status and correlating with metastatic colorectal cancer. Affinity purification using the lectin HPA followed by proteomic analysis revealed annexin 4, annexin 5 and CLCA1 to be increased in the metastatic colorectal cancer specimens. The results were validated using a further independent set of specimens and this showed a significant association between the staining score for annexin 4 and HPA and the time to metastasis; independently (annexin A4: Chi square 11.45, P = 0.0007; HPA: Chi square 9.065, P = 0.0026) and in combination (annexin 4 and HPA combined: Chi square 13.47; P = 0.0002).

Conclusion

Glycoproteins showing changes in O-linked glycosylation in metastatic colorectal cancer have been identified. The glycosylation changes were independent of p53 and KRAS status. These proteins offer potential for further exploration as biomarkers and potential targets for metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Transmission of synovial sarcoma from a single multi-organ donor to three transplant recipients: case report

Quick and reliable testing of EGFR and KRAS is needed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to ensure optimal decision-making for targeted therapy. The Idylla™ platform was designed for Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue sections but recently several studies were published that evaluated its potential for cytological specimens. This study aimed to validate the Idylla™ platform for the detection of EGFR/KRAS mutations in cytological NSCLC samples prepared as cytoblocks using AGAR and paraffin embedding. The KRAS Idylla™ test were performed on 11 specimens with a known KRAS mutation. The EGFR Idylla™ test was performed on 18 specimens with a known primary EGFR mutation and 7 specimens with a primary EGFR-EGFR T790M resistance mutation combination. Concordant KRAS and primary EGFR mutations were detected for both KRAS and primary EGFR mutations. Samples with a total CQ value of < 26 could be considered negative. Samples with a total CQ value of > 26 could not be assessed (probability of false-negative). In specimens with a primary EGFR-EGFR T790M resistance mutation combination, 5/7 cases were not concordant. Our results confirm the conclusion of recent reports that the Idylla™EGFR assay is not suitable in a resistance to EGFR TKI setting, also not in our cytological NSCLC samples prepared as cytoblocks using AGAR and paraffin embedding. KRAS and primary EGFR mutations were detected using the Idylla™ assays in virtually all cytological NSCLC samples. This analysis was rapid and time-saving compared to other mutation detection assays and may be useful if the amount of material is insufficient to perform a full set of molecular tests.     

Cigarette smoking and KRAS oncogene mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study

Since a KRAS oncogene mutation is an early event in colorectal cancer development and cigarette smoking is thought to have an effect on early stages of colorectal tumorigenesis, smoking, especially long-term smoking, may be associated with the risk for colorectal cancer with KRAS oncogene mutations. In the Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (n=120,852 men and women), using a case-cohort design, adjusted incidence rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed for colorectal tumors with wild-type and with mutated KRAS gene, and with specific G:C-->T:A or G:C-->A:T point mutations in KRAS, according to cigarette smoking status, frequency, duration, pack years, age at first exposure, years since cessation, inhalation and filter usage. After 7.3 years and excluding the first 2.3 years, 648 cases and 4083 sub-cohort members were included in the analyses. Ex-smokers, but not current smokers, were at increased risk for colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS gene tumors when compared with never smokers, albeit not statistically significant (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96-1.66). This was not observed for KRAS mutated tumors when comparing ex-smokers with never smokers (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.79-1.66). The highest category of smoking frequency (>20 cigarettes/day) and inhalation of smoke were associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS gene tumors, though not statistically significant, when compared with never smoking (frequency: RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.90-1.71 and inhalation: RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.67). These associations were strongest in men (ex-smokers: RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.00-3.20; frequency: RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.03-3.52; inhalation: RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.94-3.04). No associations were observed between any of the smoking characteristics and the risk for colorectal cancer with mutated KRAS gene tumors, nor where there any clear associations with tumors with specific G:C-->A:T transitions or G:C-->T:A transversions. These results suggest that, in contrast to the hypothesis, smoking does not increase the risk for colorectal tumors with a mutated KRAS gene. Some smoking characteristics, i.e. being an ex-smoker, frequency and inhalation, may be associated with risk for colorectal cancer characterized by the wild-type KRAS gene, especially in men.     

Tumor Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase Signaling and Development of Metastatic Disease in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Background

Recognizing EGFR as key orchestrator of the metastatic process in colorectal cancer, but also the substantial heterogeneity of responses to anti-EGFR therapy, we examined the pattern of composite tumor kinase activities governed by EGFR-mediated signaling that might be implicated in development of metastatic disease.

Patients and Methods

Point mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA and ERBB2 amplification were determined in primary tumors from 63 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer scheduled for radical treatment. Using peptide arrays with tyrosine kinase substrates, ex vivo phosphopeptide profiles were generated from the same baseline tumor samples and correlated to metastasis-free survival.

Results

Unsupervised clustering analysis of the resulting phosphorylation of 102 array substrates defined two tumor classes, both consisting of cases with and without KRAS/BRAF mutations. The smaller cluster group of patients, with tumors generating high ex vivo phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-related substrates, had a particularly aggressive disease course, with almost a half of patients developing metastatic disease within one year of follow-up.

Conclusion

High phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-mediated signaling activity of the primary tumor, rather than KRAS/BRAF mutation status, was identified as a hallmark of poor metastasis-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing radical treatment of the pelvic cavity.     

Effect of KRAS mutation status on the efficiency of Avastin therapy of colorectal cancer

Anti-angiogenic therapy became a standard care of advanced colorectal cancer. Since the most frequent genetic alteration of colorectal cancer is KRAS mutation we have analyzed its effect on the efficacy of Avastin treatment. Since 2008 we have determined the KRAS status of 575 patients with colorectal carcinoma using a sensitive screening method and sequencing. In our database the frequency of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer is 37% (codon 12: 31% followed by codon 13: 6%). We have examined the effect of KRAS status on the efficacy of Avastin treatment in 35 patients. Progression-free survival of KRAS mutant patients was highly similar to that of wild-type patients using log-rank test (9.2+/-5.5 months versus 8.7+/-5.7 months, respectively). Our data support those observations that KRAS status of colorectal cancer does not interfere with the efficacy of Avastin treatment.     

高频度微卫星不稳定性大肠癌"修饰型"微卫星变化与MLH1及KRAS基因突变密切相关

本研究通过方法学的改良和观察方式的创新试图阐明这种现象的原因.微卫星非传统的检测方法仅能实现微卫星定性检测,我所在的研究组开发了自动片段分析双荧光标识技术,提高了微卫星检测的感度和重复性,并实现了微卫星片段变化长度的定量.小于6碱基的微卫星变化被定义为修饰型微卫星不稳定,大于8碱基的变化被定义为跳跃型微卫星不稳定,它们的电泳谱截然不同.前者表现为在非肿瘤来源微卫星位点基础上的增加或减少,后者表现为距离非肿瘤微卫星片段远隔部位的新波形的出现.通过研究我们发现,在DNA错配修复缺陷细胞系及基因敲除大鼠自发肿瘤样本,仅有修饰型微卫星不稳定性检出;在人类DNA错配修复缺陷细胞系连续80次传代也没有检出跳跃型变化.跳跃型变化不能通过简单重复序列不稳定基础上的增加或减少的累加而获得.在76例散发大肠癌,我们检测了微卫星不稳定性,KRAS基因突变,并对高频度微卫星不稳定性病例的两个主要DNA错配修复基因MSH2和MLHl进行了全长测序.我们发现,在大肠癌,按频度的传统分类与按波形变化的分类有高度的一致性,高频度微卫星不稳定性病例均检测到跳跃型表现,低频度微卫星不稳定性都表现为修饰型变化.在12例高频度微卫星不稳定病例,有三例检出了跳跃型和修饰型同时存在微卫星不稳定的特殊表型,这3例均检出KRAS的突变,更有趣的是该3例病例也同时检出了DNA错配修复基因MLH1的变异.而在其他9例高频度微卫星不稳定病例,KRAS突变及MLH1、MSH2交变未检出.通过对突变谱的分析我们还发现,修饰型微卫星不稳定与KTAS基因12号密码子的转换型突变高度相关,而微卫星稳定的病例检出的KRAS基因12号密码子突变多为颠换型突变.修饰型微卫星不稳定表型检出的高频度转换突变可由DNA错配修复缺陷的分子背景解释.通过本研究,我们认为以波形为基础的微卫星不稳定新分型可能是解决目前微卫星研究领域矛盾的一个选项.一直公认为高频度微卫星不稳定性是"真正"的DNA错配修复缺陷表型,我们的研究提示实际上高频度微卫星的可能是多元的.修饰型微卫星不稳定与DNA错配修复缺陷直接关联,而跳跃型微卫星不稳定的原因尚未阐明.在高频度为微型不稳定中,携带修饰型变化的病例可以通过DNA错配修复系统缺陷来解释其病因.     

High BRAF Mutation Frequency and Marked Survival Differences in Subgroups According to KRAS/BRAF Mutation Status and Tumor Tissue Availability in a Prospective Population-Based Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Cohort

RAS and BRAF mutations impact treatment and prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC), but the knowledge is based on trial patients usually not representative for the general cancer population. Patient characteristics, treatment and efficacy according to KRAS, BRAF and MSI status were analyzed in a prospectively collected unselected population-based cohort of 798 non-resectable mCRC patients. The cohort contained many patients with poor performance status (39% PS 2-4) and elderly (37% age>75), groups usually not included in clinical trials. Patients without available tissue micro array (TMA) (42%) had worse prognostic factors and inferior survival (all patients; 7m vs 11m, chemotherapy-treated;12m vs 17m). The 92 patients (21%) with BRAF mutation had a poor prognosis regardless of microsatellite instability, but receipt of 1-2^nd chemotherapy was similar to wildtype BRAF patients. Median survival in this cohort varied from 1 month in BRAF mutated patients not given chemotherapy to 26 months in wildtype KRAS/BRAF patients <75 years in good PS. TMA availability, BRAF mutation and KRAS mutation were all independent prognostic factors for survival. The observed 21% BRAF mutation incidence is higher than the previously and repeatedly reported incidence of 5-12% in mCRC. Screening for BRAF mutations before selection of treatment is relevant for many patients, especially outside clinical trials. A BRAF mutation only partly explained the very poor prognosis of many mCRC patients. Survival in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer patients is extremely variable and subgroups have an extremely short survival compared to trial patients. Patients without available TMA had worse prognostic factors and shorter survival, which questions the total generalizability of present TMA studies and implies that we lack information on the biologically worst mCRC cases. Lack of available tissue is an important underexposed issue which introduces sample bias, and this should be recognized more clearly when conclusions are made from translational mCRC studies.     

KRAS mutations testing in colorectal carcinoma patients in Italy: from guidelines to external quality assessment

Background

Monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) that do not carry KRAS mutations. Therefore, KRAS testing has become mandatory to chose the most appropriate therapy for these patients.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In order to guarantee the possibility for mCRC patients to receive an high quality KRAS testing in every Italian region, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society of Pathology and Cytopathology -Italian division of the International Academy of Pathology (SIAPEC-IAP) started a program to improve KRAS testing. AIOM and SIAPEC identified a large panel of Italian medical oncologists, pathologists and molecular biologists that outlined guidelines for KRAS testing in mCRC patients. These guidelines include specific information on the target patient population, the biological material for molecular analysis, the extraction of DNA, and the methods for the mutational analysis that are summarized in this paper. Following the publication of the guidelines, the scientific societies started an external quality assessment scheme for KRAS testing. Five CRC specimens with known KRAS mutation status were sent to the 59 centers that participated to the program. The samples were validated by three referral laboratories. The participating laboratories were allowed to use their own preferred method for DNA extraction and mutational analysis and were asked to report the results within 4 weeks. The limit to pass the quality assessment was set at 100% of true responses. In the first round, only two centers did not pass (3%). The two centers were offered to participate to a second round and both centers failed again to pass.

Conclusions

The results of this first Italian quality assessment for KRAS testing suggest that KRAS mutational analysis is performed with good quality in the majority of Italian centers.     

Exclusive KRAS mutation in microsatellite-unstable human colorectal carcinomas with sequence alterations in the DNA mismatch repair gene, MLH1

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is regarded as reflecting defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR). MMR defects lead to an increase in point mutations, as well as repeat instability, on the genome. However, despite the highly unstable microsatellites, base substitutions in representative oncogenes or tumor suppressors are extremely infrequent in MSI-positive tumors. Recently, the heterogeneity in MSI-positive colorectal tumors is pointed out, and the 'hereditary' and 'sporadic settings' are proposed. Particularly in the former, base substitution mutations in KRAS are regarded as relatively frequent. We sequenced the KRAS gene in a panel of 76 human colorectal carcinomas in which the MSI status has been determined. KRAS mutations were detected in 22 tumors (28.9%). Intriguingly, all of the KRAS-mutant MSI-H (high) tumors harbored sequence alterations in an essential MMR gene, MLH1, which implies that KRAS mutation more frequently and almost exclusively occurs in MMR gene-mutant MSI-H tumors. Furthermore, in contrast with the prevailing viewpoint, some of these tumors are derived from sporadic colorectal cancer patients. The tight connection between MMR gene mutation and KRAS mutation may suggest previously unrecognized complexities in the relationship between MSI and the mutator phenotype derived from defective MMR.