Control of the expression and compartmentalization of (sigma)G activity during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis by regulators of (sigma)F and (sigma)E

During formation of spores by Bacillus subtilis the RNA polymerase factor sigma(G) ordinarily becomes active during spore formation exclusively in the prespore upon completion of engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Formation and activation of sigma(G) ordinarily requires prior activity of sigma(F) in the prespore and sigma(E) in the mother cell. Here we report that in spoIIA mutants lacking both sigma(F) and the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB and in which sigma(E) is not active, sigma(G) nevertheless becomes active. Further, its activity is largely confined to the mother cell. Thus, there is a switch in the location of sigma(G) activity from prespore to mother cell. Factors contributing to the mother cell location are inferred to be read-through of spoIIIG, the structural gene for sigma(G), from the upstream spoIIG locus and the absence of SpoIIAB, which can act in the mother cell as an anti-sigma factor to sigma(G). When the spoIIIG locus was moved away from spoIIG to the distal amyE locus, sigma(G) became active earlier in sporulation in spoIIA deletion mutants, and the sporulation septum was not formed, suggesting that premature sigma(G) activation can block septum formation. We report a previously unrecognized control in which SpoIIGA can prevent the appearance of sigma(G) activity, and pro-sigma(E) (but not sigma(E)) can counteract this effect of SpoIIGA. We find that in strains lacking sigma(F) and SpoIIAB and engineered to produce active sigma(E) in the mother cell without the need for SpoIIGA, sigma(G) also becomes active in the mother cell.     

The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis

Endospore formation by Bacillus subtilis involves three differentiating cell types, the predivisional cell, the mother cell, and the forespore. Here we report the program of gene expression in the forespore, which is governed by the RNA polymerase sigma factors sigma(F) and sigma(G) and the DNA-binding proteins RsfA and SpoVT. The sigma(F) factor turns on about 48 genes, including the gene for RsfA, which represses a gene in the sigma(F) regulon, and the gene for sigma(G). The sigma(G) factor newly activates 81 genes, including the gene for SpoVT, which turns on (in nine cases) or stimulates (in 11 cases) the expression of 20 genes that had been turned on by sigma(G) and represses the expression of 27 others. The forespore line of gene expression consists of many genes that contribute to morphogenesis and to the resistance and germination properties of the spore but few that have metabolic functions. Comparative genomics reveals a core of genes in the sigma(F) and sigma(G) regulons that are widely conserved among endospore-forming species but are absent from closely related, but non-spore-forming Listeria spp. Two such partially conserved genes (ykoU and ykoV), which are members of the sigma(G) regulon, are shown to confer dry-heat resistance to dormant spores. The ykoV gene product, a homolog of the non-homologous end-joining protein Ku, is shown to associate with the nucleoid during germination. Extending earlier work on gene expression in the predivisional cell and the mother cell, we present an integrated overview of the entire program of sporulation gene expression.     

Differential gene expression in genetically identical sister cells: the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Early in sporulation, the cell divides asymmetrically to give two sister compartments, a smaller prespore and a larger mother cell. Differential gene expression in these compartments depends on the regulation of the first sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma(F), which is activated only in the prespore. Regulation relies on the interactions of four proteins -sigma(F), its antisigma SpoIIAB (which also has protein kinase activity), the anti-antisigma SpoIIAA and the protein phosphatase SpoIIE. Before asymmetric division, and in the mother cell after division, sigma(F) is held in an inactive complex with SpoIIAB and ATP; SpoIIAA is in its phosphorylated form. To disrupt the complex so as to liberate sigma(F) in the prespore, dephosphorylated SpoIIAA is needed, and this is made available by SpoIIE. Thereafter, SpoIIAB and SpoIIE are active simultaneously in the prespore, cycling SpoIIAA through phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms. This cycle detains SpoIIAB in a state in which it cannot inhibit sigma(F). Results from biophysical techniques, mathematical simulations and enzyme kinetics have now helped to elucidate the dynamics of the protein-protein interactions involved. An understanding of these dynamics largely accounts for the regulation of sigma(F). We show that the system is tuned to be highly efficient in its use of components and extremely economical in conserving ATP.     

A secreted factor and cyclic AMP jointly regulate cell-type-specific gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum.

We are studying cell differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum by examining the regulation of genes that are preferentially expressed in different cell types. A system has been established in which prestalk- and prespore-cell-specific genes are expressed in single cells in response to culture conditions. We confirm our previous results showing that cyclic AMP induces prestalk genes and now show that it is also required for prespore gene induction. The expression of both classes of genes is additionally dependent on the presence of a factor(s) secreted by developing cells which we call conditioned medium factor(s). An assay for conditioned medium factor(s) shows that it is detectable within 2.5 h after the onset of development. Conditioned medium factor(s) also promotes the expression of genes induced early in development, but has no detectable effect on the expression of actin genes and a gene expressed maximally in vegetative cells. In the presence of conditioned medium factor(s), exogenous cyclic AMP at the onset of starvation fails to induce the prespore and prestalk genes. The addition of cyclic AMP between 2 and 12 h of starvation results in rapid prestalk gene expression, whereas prespore genes are induced at an invarient time (approximately 18 h after the onset of starvation). These data suggest that cyclic AMP and conditioned medium factor(s) are sufficient for prestalk gene induction, whereas an additional parameter(s) is involved in the control of prespore gene induction. In contrast to several previous studies, we show that multicellularity is not essential for the expression of either prespore or prestalk genes. These data indicate that prespore and prestalk genes have cell-type-specific as well as shared regulatory factors.